|
Title: On the nature of PROOF, and valuation of "proof-of-" coins Post by: HunterMinerCrafter on September 16, 2014, 09:10:14 PM Quote From this proposition it will follow, when arithmetical addition has been defined, that 1+1=2. —Principia Mathematica, Volume I, page 360.Quote A mathematical theory is not to be considered complete until you have made it so clear that you can explain it to the first man whom you meet on the street. —David HilbertQuote Perfection is when there is no longer anything more to take away. —Antoine de Saint-ExuperyQuote Set theory can be viewed as a form of exact theology. —Rudy RuckerQuote We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two, because one and one are two. We are finding that we must learn a great deal more about 'and.' —Sir Arthur EddingtonQuotes from homepage of Metamath Proof Explorer. If it isn't axiomatic you probably shouldn't buy into it, because it likely isn't true, plain and simple. Be careful out there. Title: Re: On the nature of PROOF, and valuation of "proof-of-" coins Post by: Jacqul on September 17, 2014, 10:54:32 PM All in first post is axiomatic truth.
In simplicity lies the beauty of perfection. Simplicity even with imperfection is beautiful. Wabi-sabi I suppose. :) |