|
Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: aq on September 16, 2011, 02:07:27 PM LOL it's an open source project - there are no 'leaders' as you describe them. You must be new here. Never heard of the cult-of-solidcoin?No one can force anyone to do anything. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: Lolcust on September 16, 2011, 02:59:54 PM LOL it's an open source project - there are no 'leaders' as you describe them. You must be new here. Never heard of the cult-of-solidcoin?No one can force anyone to do anything. Judging from the fact that at least one pool and who knows how many soloers have disagreed with Queen Bit of Solidcoin and refused to shut down, it's neither really a cult nor particularly solid. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 05:19:13 PM Correct me if I'm wrong, but Solidcoin 2.0 will be only minable by built-in miner (not a biggie since it is a CPU-chain, but still kinda sorta interesting property in terms of isolating it)
Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 05:45:54 PM Correct me if I'm wrong, but Solidcoin 2.0 will be only minable by built-in miner (not a biggie since it is a CPU-chain, but still kinda sorta interesting property in terms of isolating it) Initially that would be true, but I don't see how other miners can't be built that can successfully mine it separate from the client using similar algorithms and the common api's Well, that's too early to tell, since all details are being shrouded in (IMHO pointless) mystery, but I know of no less than one way that makes "third party mining software" very very toilsome to implement Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: grod on October 09, 2011, 05:30:38 PM Correct me if I'm wrong, but Solidcoin 2.0 will be only minable by built-in miner (not a biggie since it is a CPU-chain, but still kinda sorta interesting property in terms of isolating it) Initially that would be true, but I don't see how other miners can't be built that can successfully mine it separate from the client using similar algorithms and the common api's Well, that's too early to tell, since all details are being shrouded in (IMHO pointless) mystery, but I know of no less than one way that makes "third party mining software" very very toilsome to implement If only there were such things as decompilers that could take a bunch of assembly and emit something which could be computer translated to a different language. Even if it's a sub-optimal translation any algorithm suitable for GPU would still be a massive win over running on a CPU. If it's scrypt or scrypt-like, yeah, he's probably good. Still, it's a bunch of work and not worth doing unless SC2.0 adoption is widespread with a large amount of money on the line. Even now, tenebrix, the most widely adopted CPU currency only has $10,000 worth of BTC available for the taking. We'll see what happens when there are 4 CPU-friendly currencies vying for that niche. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: DavinciJ15 on October 28, 2011, 11:11:32 AM BitcoinEXpress has 100.000+ of BTC. Everybody should consider this when reading BCX's comments about alt-chains ;D The amount of any form of currency I hold doesn't alter the facts that Solidcoin has central control, a 10% tax, closed source and controlled by one person. A prime example is the block reward from 32 coins to 5 coins on a whim by the developer. The purpose of this was to artificially inflate the value of his pre-mined 12 million coins and the 10% of all coins which goes to his personal wallet called a CPF. I am simply putting the information out for new people to see, in keeping with topic of the original post by Lead Bitcoin Developer Gavin Andresen I also agree RESEARCH and be especially careful with ANY Alt Chain. Anyone trying to sell you on any chain should be a huge red flag. You did not need to answer his post anyone with intelligence would understand that your holdings in Bitcoin is irrelevant to the facts regarding SolidCoin 2.0. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: NASDAQEnema on January 09, 2012, 05:47:35 PM Solidcoin 2.0 is a Scam and Here is Why Soildcoin 2.0I am writing this for the crypto-currency newbie who may be looking for information on Solidcoin 2.0. If you are searching Google and researching information on Solidcoin 2.0 and found this I commend you on taking that all important first move. I also urge you to research this forum for Solidcoin 2.0 and decide if this is something any sane person would delve into once they know the facts. Issues to research 13,000,000 Solidcoins Pre-Mined Solidcoin 2.0 has over 13,000,000 pre-mined coins controlled by the lead Solidcoin 2.0 developer Coinhunter. Those pre-mined coins are distributed to 12 "Trusted Nodes" and according to Coinhunter cannot be spent on the open market. Yes Coinhunter's word is all we have. In reality at anytime of his choosing he could simply transfer a bulk of coins to his wallet and trade. Here is a scenario that will scare any exchange of any real volume away. Let's say Solidcoin 2.0 gains parity with the USD or about 0.2 BTC at this posting combined with an exchange that cultivated a market depth of $500,000 to $1 Million USD. This is actually not a very far stretch of possibilities if SC 2.0 would take off. In this scenario Coinhunter could simply deposit any number of coins and make millions for himself very rapidly. It would cause a huge financial loss for the exchange, as well as crash the market and de-value every Solidcoin (yours) left in existence. But why would he care, he just banked several million USD. Coinhunter has gone to extreme measures to cover his real identity, no one knows who he is or where he really resides. A ruined reputation is meaningless in this situation. It has puzzled quite a few people as to why Coinhunter would design this built in handicap to adoption, GREED is the only apparent answer. It truly serves no other purpose than for personal enrichment. Solidcoin 2.0 has been rejected by all the credible exchanges including this one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48226.0)for that very reason. 13 million pre-mine is a huge risk and a bogus payout liability that is unacceptable. Bait & Switch Maneuver In the days and weeks prior to the Solidcoin launch Coinhunter had disclosed there were 1 Million Pre-Mined coins for something he called a "Coin Protection Fee" earmarked for Solidcoin marketing, support and maintenance. This caused a lot of grumbling in the Solidcoin community when it was learned that Coinhunter would be the fund manager and only after much debate he decided he would after launch remit control to a committee of some sort. It was also learned that 10% of all blocks mined by anyone would in fact be taxed and transferred to the CPF. The Bait and Switch occurred when several hours after launch Coinhunter revealed it was 12 Million premined in addition to nearly 1.128 Million SC1 coins being incorporated into the block chain. This was not something done on the fly post launch and had to be designed into the system days and/or weeks before launch. It was never mentioned pre-release or during the beta test phase just prior to launch. This is a classic Bait and switch. It doesn't bode well for a guy insisting people simply need to trust him. Closed Source All crypto-currencies except for Solidcoin 2.0 are Open Source. Solidcoin 2.0 is a closed source product and Coinhunter refuses to release the code for independent audit by neutral third parties. An audit by an independent third party could easily certifiy Solidcoin as being Malware free, Virus free, Backdoor free and whole host of other "nasty trcks" free. Coinhunter has a demonstrated interest in Botnets and Central Control. Instead of releasing his code he says people need to simply trust him. Without the source code being released, any code certification and validation of Solidcoin 2.0 is impossible. Solidcoin 2.0 could have anything hidden in the program. Central Control All crypto-currencies except for Solidcoin use Peer <--> Peer architecture or P2P. This type of operation is very decentralized and is very hard to nearly impossible to control. Think Bit-torrent, Piratebay,.... unstoppable, irreversible, anonymous. Solidcoin uses Peer <--> Trusted Node <--> Peer architecture. This type of architecture lends itself to a high degree of control. Think Paypal, Dwolla and those types. Payments can be easily intercepted, tracked and reversed as well as stolen. This is Paypal on steroids without all the good. It should be noted that the Solidcoin Dev have denied this but refuse to release the code. There have been reported instances where this interception of transactions have occurred. Releasing the code would 100% either prove this false or prove it true. There is no legitimate reason to withhold the source. Conclusion I'm glad you are looking into Crypto-Currencies. You are taking part in the bleeding edge development of the digital payment future. As always before you invest any amount of time or money in anything worthwhile, do some thorough research. This forum BitcoinTalk.org is an excellent repository for all things Crypto-Currency. SOLIDCOIN IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN CRYPTO-CURRENCY! SOLIDCOIN IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN CRYPTO-CURRENCY! SOLIDCOIN IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN CRYPTO-CURRENCY! SOLIDCOIN IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN CRYPTO-CURRENCY! Bai bai CoinHunter. Name is fitting. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: DavinciJ15 on January 10, 2012, 12:12:19 AM SOLIDCOIN IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN CRYPTO-CURRENCY! Bai bai CoinHunter. Name is fitting. I like your handle. NasCrackEnema. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: film2240 on February 20, 2012, 01:00:34 AM Solidcoin 2.0 is a Scam and Here is Why Soildcoin 2.0I am writing this for the crypto-currency newbie who may be looking for information on Solidcoin 2.0. If you are searching Google and researching information on Solidcoin 2.0 and found this I commend you on taking that all important first move. I also urge you to research this forum for Solidcoin 2.0 and decide if this is something any sane person would delve into once they know the facts. Issues to research 13,000,000 Solidcoins Pre-Mined Solidcoin 2.0 has over 13,000,000 pre-mined coins controlled by the lead Solidcoin 2.0 developer Coinhunter. Those pre-mined coins are distributed to 12 "Trusted Nodes" and according to Coinhunter cannot be spent on the open market. Yes Coinhunter's word is all we have. In reality at anytime of his choosing he could simply transfer a bulk of coins to his wallet and trade. Here is a scenario that will scare any exchange of any real volume away. Let's say Solidcoin 2.0 gains parity with the USD or about 0.2 BTC at this posting combined with an exchange that cultivated a market depth of $500,000 to $1 Million USD. This is actually not a very far stretch of possibilities if SC 2.0 would take off. In this scenario Coinhunter could simply deposit any number of coins and make millions for himself very rapidly. It would cause a huge financial loss for the exchange, as well as crash the market and de-value every Solidcoin (yours) left in existence. But why would he care, he just banked several million USD. Coinhunter has gone to extreme measures to cover his real identity, no one knows who he is or where he really resides. A ruined reputation is meaningless in this situation. It has puzzled quite a few people as to why Coinhunter would design this built in handicap to adoption, GREED is the only apparent answer. It truly serves no other purpose than for personal enrichment. Solidcoin 2.0 has been rejected by all the credible exchanges including this one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48226.0)for that very reason. 13 million pre-mine is a huge risk and a bogus payout liability that is unacceptable. Bait & Switch Maneuver In the days and weeks prior to the Solidcoin launch Coinhunter had disclosed there were 1 Million Pre-Mined coins for something he called a "Coin Protection Fee" earmarked for Solidcoin marketing, support and maintenance. This caused a lot of grumbling in the Solidcoin community when it was learned that Coinhunter would be the fund manager and only after much debate he decided he would after launch remit control to a committee of some sort. It was also learned that 10% of all blocks mined by anyone would in fact be taxed and transferred to the CPF. The Bait and Switch occurred when several hours after launch Coinhunter revealed it was 12 Million premined in addition to nearly 1.128 Million SC1 coins being incorporated into the block chain. This was not something done on the fly post launch and had to be designed into the system days and/or weeks before launch. It was never mentioned pre-release or during the beta test phase just prior to launch. This is a classic Bait and switch. It doesn't bode well for a guy insisting people simply need to trust him. Closed Source All crypto-currencies except for Solidcoin 2.0 are Open Source. Solidcoin 2.0 is a closed source product and Coinhunter refuses to release the code for independent audit by neutral third parties. An audit by an independent third party could easily certifiy Solidcoin as being Malware free, Virus free, Backdoor free and whole host of other "nasty trcks" free. Coinhunter has a demonstrated interest in Botnets and Central Control. Instead of releasing his code he says people need to simply trust him. Without the source code being released, any code certification and validation of Solidcoin 2.0 is impossible. Solidcoin 2.0 could have anything hidden in the program. Central Control All crypto-currencies except for Solidcoin use Peer <--> Peer architecture or P2P. This type of operation is very decentralized and is very hard to nearly impossible to control. Think Bit-torrent, Piratebay,.... unstoppable, irreversible, anonymous. Solidcoin uses Peer <--> Trusted Node <--> Peer architecture. This type of architecture lends itself to a high degree of control. Think Paypal, Dwolla and those types. Payments can be easily intercepted, tracked and reversed as well as stolen. This is Paypal on steroids without all the good. It should be noted that the Solidcoin Dev have denied this but refuse to release the code. There have been reported instances where this interception of transactions have occurred. Releasing the code would 100% either prove this false or prove it true. There is no legitimate reason to withhold the source. Conclusion I'm glad you are looking into Crypto-Currencies. You are taking part in the bleeding edge development of the digital payment future. As always before you invest any amount of time or money in anything worthwhile, do some thorough research. This forum BitcoinTalk.org is an excellent repository for all things Crypto-Currency. I think it's time that this code is opened up for scrutiny as thats the only thing putting me off full adoption of SC.lack of transparancy.Having faith I feel is a dangerous thing (especially when the code isn't easily viewable for scrutiny or so it seems.I don't want another issue with CH/RS asking me to explain my comments I made about SC ,like last time so I try to remain neutral in this.I know,lol.) Also for his ID,when I did a query on his IRC on solidcointalk.org,it revealed that his real name is 'linus travolds' (so it claims),then a web address that reveals its origins from germany (could just be a proxy,who knows).That was a few days ago so it could have changed.Try a WHIOS or Query on RS's name in his IRC channel and you'll see. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: malevolent on February 21, 2012, 07:56:12 PM Also for his ID,when I did a query on his IRC on solidcointalk.org,it revealed that his real name is 'linus travolds' (so it claims),then a web address that reveals its origins from germany (could just be a proxy,who knows).That was a few days ago so it could have changed.Try a WHIOS or Query on RS's name in his IRC channel and you'll see. Sounds like Linus Torvalds... Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: film2240 on May 17, 2012, 10:13:55 AM Thanks for helping to expose more problematic aspects of microcash BitcoinEXpress.I did wonder what was up with the part where a portion of money gets taken away from every user wallet (a tax maybe).Of course it has to do with that CPF (Coin protection fund) because why else would a 'tax' be required.In bitcoin this is just the transaction fee that goes to the miners processing payments from other people.In SC/Microcash the 'tax' goes to 1 person who owns the CPF.
It's important that people know about this 'tax', especially if you are the type of person who thinks that Microcash is some great new currency.It's not.It's just a revision of SolidCoin. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: notyep on May 19, 2012, 07:07:28 PM Thanks for helping to expose more problematic aspects of microcash BitcoinEXpress.I did wonder what was up with the part where a portion of money gets taken away from every user wallet (a tax maybe).Of course it has to do with that CPF (Coin protection fund) because why else would a 'tax' be required.In bitcoin this is just the transaction fee that goes to the miners processing payments from other people.In SC/Microcash the 'tax' goes to 1 person who owns the CPF. It's important that people know about this 'tax', especially if you are the type of person who thinks that Microcash is some great new currency.It's not.It's just a revision of SolidCoin. Microcash has had 8 months of constant development that includes numerous advancements (many that bitcoin has worked to incorporate but hasn't yet accomplished for whatever reason). Regardless, the production release is literally around the corner and the entire world will soon see what dedicated focus and exceptional programming skill by a strong community of supporters and investors can accomplish. What is intriguing is that the code is so radically new, I cannot emphasize enough that it shouldn't be compared to bitcoin in any form or fashion. In fact once released, review of the source will show how it has been cleansed of bitcoin code. It is inevitable that bitcoin and alt.chains based on the original bitcoin design will evolve significantly due to the new capabilities that are available now. This must and will happen. "Get Ready...." Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: malevolent on May 19, 2012, 07:36:56 PM Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: notyep on May 19, 2012, 10:48:56 PM People from all walks of life not to mention those who trade for SC on the exchanges. In spite of the negative comments posted against SC/MC, the exchanges demonstrate the interest and confidence the world has in the work being done to make it a success. Take the owners of BTC-e.com for instance. Would the owner of a VERY profitable service offer SC if it were not viable? Regardless of how much people try to discourage others from getting involved with SC/MC due to fear from competition, the momentum will continue and the exchanges and investors will continue to support it due to the backing it has. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: kano on May 20, 2012, 01:27:51 AM McDonald's make a lot of money every year ...
Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: malevolent on May 20, 2012, 01:15:51 PM People from all walks of life not to mention those who trade for SC on the exchanges. In spite of the negative comments posted against SC/MC, the exchanges demonstrate the interest and confidence the world has in the work being done to make it a success. Take the owners of BTC-e.com for instance. Would the owner of a VERY profitable service offer SC if it were not viable? Regardless of how much people try to discourage others from getting involved with SC/MC due to fear from competition, the momentum will continue and the exchanges and investors will continue to support it due to the backing it has. Who are the ''investors'', again? Exchanges? Who is using this currency for buying/selling of products/services? For now I only see a few individuals speculating and looking for idiots. Protip Try elsewhere! BTW. https://btc-e.com/news/67 Quote In view of the minimal volume of currencies pairs RUC/USD and the SC/USD from April 15 trades with them will be closed. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: notyep on May 20, 2012, 01:45:52 PM People from all walks of life not to mention those who trade for SC on the exchanges. In spite of the negative comments posted against SC/MC, the exchanges demonstrate the interest and confidence the world has in the work being done to make it a success. Take the owners of BTC-e.com for instance. Would the owner of a VERY profitable service offer SC if it were not viable? Regardless of how much people try to discourage others from getting involved with SC/MC due to fear from competition, the momentum will continue and the exchanges and investors will continue to support it due to the backing it has. Who are the ''investors'', again? Exchanges? Who is using this currency for buying/selling of products/services? For now I only see a few individuals speculating and looking for idiots. Protip Try elsewhere! BTW. https://btc-e.com/news/67 Quote In view of the minimal volume of currencies pairs RUC/USD and the SC/USD from April 15 trades with them will be closed. Answer this, if SC/MC were not a viable currency, why on earth would it exist on BTC-e.com being traded for "BTC" at this very moment?? The answer is this, they see the potential and thus it will remain there. Unfortunately, you're not wise enough to understand the amount of work and money that has been devoted to the project. I guess this means there are a lot of IDIOTs in the world? Isn't it ironic that often those who are considered IDIOTs and go against the grain are the very ones that change the world for the better? "Even in the deepest, darkest cave with a candlestick shining bright, there are those who will never see the light...." v/r Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: kano on May 20, 2012, 02:20:46 PM I0coins are being traded on vircurex with a higher volume (even considering the price difference) than SC
I0coins 55x the volume, but SC is only 40x the price So does that mean you can apply your argument to I0coins also? Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: notyep on May 20, 2012, 08:12:22 PM I0coins are being traded on vircurex with a higher volume (even considering the price difference) than SC I0coins 55x the volume, but SC is only 40x the price So does that mean you can apply your argument to I0coins also? I can apply my argument to ANY current cyrpto-currency based on the original BTC design. Take for instance the following graph: http://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size (http://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size) It is the above characteristic why the current design has hit a brick wall. We live in a mobile world now, there is absolutely no way possible for BTC or any other similar currency design with a block-chain this large to be used as a medium for commerce efficiently let alone in the world of mobility (are you kidding me, a 1.3GB blockhain????) The power that all the mobile phones, CPUs, GPUs would use to deal with such a download on the earth would be put to better use boiling the oceans. This is one of the many problems the MC design solves. As I've said before, don't compare it to anything BTC related, it is pointless. Title: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: kano on May 20, 2012, 09:04:47 PM I0coins are being traded on vircurex with a higher volume (even considering the price difference) than SC I0coins 55x the volume, but SC is only 40x the price So does that mean you can apply your argument to I0coins also? I can apply my argument to ANY current cyrpto-currency based on the original BTC design. Take for instance the following graph: http://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size (http://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size) It is the above characteristic why the current design has hit a brick wall. We live in a mobile world now, there is absolutely no way possible for BTC or any other similar currency design with a block-chain this large to be used as a medium for commerce efficiently let alone in the world of mobility (are you kidding me, a 1.3GB blockhain????) The power that all the mobile phones, CPUs, GPUs would use to deal with such a download on the earth would be put to better use boiling the oceans. This is one of the many problems the MC design solves. As I've said before, don't compare it to anything BTC related, it is pointless. LOL Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: notyep on May 21, 2012, 01:27:13 AM I0coins are being traded on vircurex with a higher volume (even considering the price difference) than SC I0coins 55x the volume, but SC is only 40x the price So does that mean you can apply your argument to I0coins also? I can apply my argument to ANY current cyrpto-currency based on the original BTC design. Take for instance the following graph: http://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size (http://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size) It is the above characteristic why the current design has hit a brick wall. We live in a mobile world now, there is absolutely no way possible for BTC or any other similar currency design with a block-chain this large to be used as a medium for commerce efficiently let alone in the world of mobility (are you kidding me, a 1.3GB blockhain????) The power that all the mobile phones, CPUs, GPUs would use to deal with such a download on the earth would be put to better use boiling the oceans. This is one of the many problems the MC design solves. As I've said before, don't compare it to anything BTC related, it is pointless. LOL Right, the "workaround" remote-control apps that have the "REAL" wallet on a host provider infrastructure wherein the security of your funds rests with the security of the host provider (how many of these horror films have we seen up to this point??? These disasters never seem to end do they??). Let's face it, BTC wasn't designed for mobility and MC addresses that directly. Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: Etlase2 on May 21, 2012, 01:45:02 AM Right, the "workaround" remote-control apps that have the "REAL" wallet on a host provider infrastructure wherein the security of your funds rests with the security of the host provider (how many of these horror films have we seen up to this point??? These disasters never seem to end do they??). Let's face it, BTC wasn't designed for mobility and MC addresses that directly*. * - details forthcoming (never lol) Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: Syke on May 21, 2012, 03:37:20 AM Right, the "workaround" remote-control apps that have the "REAL" wallet on a host provider infrastructure wherein the security of your funds rests with the security of the host provider (how many of these horror films have we seen up to this point??? These disasters never seem to end do they??). Let's face it, BTC wasn't designed for mobility and MC addresses that directly. notyep, the more you open your mouth the more you look like a fool. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.wallet&hl=en Android Bitcoin Wallet, doesn't use a host provider, and doesn't store a 1.3 GB blockchain. Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: notyep on May 21, 2012, 11:02:13 AM Right, the "workaround" remote-control apps that have the "REAL" wallet on a host provider infrastructure wherein the security of your funds rests with the security of the host provider (how many of these horror films have we seen up to this point??? These disasters never seem to end do they??). Let's face it, BTC wasn't designed for mobility and MC addresses that directly. notyep, the more you open your mouth the more you look like a fool. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.wallet&hl=en Android Bitcoin Wallet, doesn't use a host provider, and doesn't store a 1.3 GB blockchain. Are you kidding me??? This very app that you're promoting has a reputation for not being reliable!! I wonder why??? It is due to the massive size of the network block chain. If you hadn't noticed, the following remark comes the very front page of the URL you posted above: Bakes on April 18, 2012 (HTC G2 with version 2.01) Unreliable Sent a coin from it weeks ago, still has not arrived. Do not transfer large amounts to your wallet, as you may never get them out again Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: Syke on May 22, 2012, 03:03:46 AM Are you kidding me??? This very app that you're promoting has a reputation for not being reliable!! I wonder why??? It is due to the massive size of the network block chain. No, it comes from people not understanding that the blockchain needs to be up-to-date. That's simply a matter of educating the users. And don't try to change the subject. You claimed mobile clients for Bitcoin require a 1.3 GB blockchain download. They don't. Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: LoupGaroux on May 22, 2012, 03:26:08 AM Why do we even bother responding to yet another RS/CH/DoucheBag sock-puppet? Great, they have renamed their pile of steaming crap once again. This time in addition to stealing the code, they stole the name too. Guess that is sure going to attract the "investors" to their pretend little circle jerk world where the same group of five fuckwits keeps pretending they are manipulating the market, and that they somehow matter.
Guess what? Nobody gives a damn. It's a bad joke. Run by an incredibly stupid individual who insists that going back to the same well and back-raping the same group of ten people is going to make him a celebrity, and he will be able to move out of his mom's basement. None of this foolishness is real, there is no demand for yet another abortion of a crypto-joke coin. In the movies someone would have stuck a big ole stake through its pathetic little heart by now, instead we get to be entertained by the next personality leaking out from under RS/CH/Douchebag's meds. Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: notyep on May 22, 2012, 10:58:35 AM Why do we even bother responding to yet another RS/CH/DoucheBag sock-puppet? Great, they have renamed their pile of steaming crap once again. This time in addition to stealing the code, they stole the name too. Guess that is sure going to attract the "investors" to their pretend little circle jerk world where the same group of five fuckwits keeps pretending they are manipulating the market, and that they somehow matter. Guess what? Nobody gives a damn. It's a bad joke. Run by an incredibly stupid individual who insists that going back to the same well and back-raping the same group of ten people is going to make him a celebrity, and he will be able to move out of his mom's basement. None of this foolishness is real, there is no demand for yet another abortion of a crypto-joke coin. In the movies someone would have stuck a big ole stake through its pathetic little heart by now, instead we get to be entertained by the next personality leaking out from under RS/CH/Douchebag's meds. Another classic example "LoupGaroux", of an individual who has absolutely NO MERIT or accomplishments of his own, but wastes his time spreading garbage regarding the work of others. Tell me "LoupGaroux", name just one thing that you have contributed in the name of BTC even. I can assure you, MC$ is going to succeed without you (LoupGalooser). ;) Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: Etlase2 on May 22, 2012, 11:47:06 AM Why do we even bother responding to yet another RS/CH/DoucheBag sock-puppet? Great, they have renamed their pile of steaming crap once again. This time in addition to stealing the code, they stole the name too. Guess that is sure going to attract the "investors" to their pretend little circle jerk world where the same group of five fuckwits keeps pretending they are manipulating the market, and that they somehow matter. Guess what? Nobody gives a damn. It's a bad joke. Run by an incredibly stupid individual who insists that going back to the same well and back-raping the same group of ten people is going to make him a celebrity, and he will be able to move out of his mom's basement. None of this foolishness is real, there is no demand for yet another abortion of a crypto-joke coin. In the movies someone would have stuck a big ole stake through its pathetic little heart by now, instead we get to be entertained by the next personality leaking out from under RS/CH/Douchebag's meds. Why not, bear with me for a second, just not post what you posted instead, giving notyep more ammo to reply to? These threads would fall off quicker if you actually did what you ask. Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: LoupGaroux on May 22, 2012, 12:01:42 PM Well, well, well, looks like Gilligan got marching orders from the Captain to stand up for his latest abomination in spite of all logic, truth or reality! Congrats, sock-puppet, welcome to the world. Let's break your last down, shall we?
The word you were looking for was "wastes", using "waists in this context makes no sense whatsoever, much like releasing any kind of new MicroShortBusCoinCash. I don't need to call attention to my accomplishments or to debate personal merit, those who gain from knowing what I do and where I do it, know. Since you don't know means you don't matter. I don't have any need to debate personal accomplishments with a false identity created for the sole purpose of slavishly promoting a bad idea, in an inappropriate forum for doing so. You could assure me that the moon is actually made of green cheese too, that would be equally nonsensical as "assuring" me about MicroShortBusCoinCash's success, and equally worthless. What I can assure you, is that your precious little vanity project will HAPPEN (if you ever get around to releasing your beta, just like all the other glorious failures of ShortBusCoin) without my participation. And just a personal suggestion, if I might? When trying to make an ad hominem attack out of a badly mangled spelling of a trite homonym, at least try to stay with the original language. It adds cred to your shot, and allows people with an IQ in double digits or better to appreciate your wit. Your way just makes you look like a naughty little monkey throwing feces around your mom's basement. Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: notyep on May 22, 2012, 04:50:32 PM Edit made (you're one amazing piece of work... All of that rambling in the name of bashing the work of others. So sad...)
Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: k9quaint on May 22, 2012, 05:28:45 PM Edit made (you're one amazing piece of work... All of that rambling in the name of bashing the work of others. So sad...) Maybe you should stop hiding behind aliases and take credit for your abortion. Then people might take you seriously. Until then, we can all enjoy Loup's treatment of you. Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: LoupGaroux on May 22, 2012, 11:38:25 PM Edit made (you're one amazing piece of work... All of that rambling in the name of bashing the work of others. So sad...) See with a little effort, you actually made a claim that makes sense... indeed, I am one amazing piece of work. Nicely done. If it was work, I wouldn't need to bash it, it's theft of the work of others and claiming it is yours. That, is in and of itself worthy of abuse. Being shilled so mindlessly in an utterly inappropriate venue makes it sport. You would be better off going into some place that might actually listen to the silliness about this farcical coin and consider adopting it. I would suggest perhaps the Deaf Club. Except it closed. Darn the luck. Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: Starlightbreaker on May 23, 2012, 12:56:18 AM Why do we even bother responding to yet another RS/CH/DoucheBag sock-puppet? Great, they have renamed their pile of steaming crap once again. This time in addition to stealing the code, they stole the name too. Guess that is sure going to attract the "investors" to their pretend little circle jerk world where the same group of five fuckwits keeps pretending they are manipulating the market, and that they somehow matter. Guess what? Nobody gives a damn. It's a bad joke. Run by an incredibly stupid individual who insists that going back to the same well and back-raping the same group of ten people is going to make him a celebrity, and he will be able to move out of his mom's basement. None of this foolishness is real, there is no demand for yet another abortion of a crypto-joke coin. In the movies someone would have stuck a big ole stake through its pathetic little heart by now, instead we get to be entertained by the next personality leaking out from under RS/CH/Douchebag's meds. Another classic example "LoupGaroux", of an individual who has absolutely NO MERIT or accomplishments of his own, but wastes his time spreading garbage regarding the work of others. Tell me "LoupGaroux", name just one thing that you have contributed in the name of BTC even. I can assure you, MC$ is going to succeed without you (LoupGalooser). ;) is that you? lol, that sounds very you. ....wait, we already figured it anyways. nevermiiiind. Title: Re: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) Post by: Cosbycoin on May 23, 2012, 01:10:53 AM Why do we even bother responding to yet another RS/CH/DoucheBag sock-puppet? Great, they have renamed their pile of steaming crap once again. This time in addition to stealing the code, they stole the name too. Guess that is sure going to attract the "investors" to their pretend little circle jerk world where the same group of five fuckwits keeps pretending they are manipulating the market, and that they somehow matter. Guess what? Nobody gives a damn. It's a bad joke. Run by an incredibly stupid individual who insists that going back to the same well and back-raping the same group of ten people is going to make him a celebrity, and he will be able to move out of his mom's basement. None of this foolishness is real, there is no demand for yet another abortion of a crypto-joke coin. In the movies someone would have stuck a big ole stake through its pathetic little heart by now, instead we get to be entertained by the next personality leaking out from under RS/CH/Douchebag's meds. Another classic example "LoupGaroux", of an individual who has absolutely NO MERIT or accomplishments of his own, but wastes his time spreading garbage regarding the work of others. Tell me "LoupGaroux", name just one thing that you have contributed in the name of BTC even. I can assure you, MC$ is going to succeed without you (LoupGalooser). ;) is that you? lol, that sounds very you. ....wait, we already figured it anyways. nevermiiiind. It's him |