|
Title: shouldn't there be a "reputation" system along with "trust" system? Post by: --Encrypted-- on October 18, 2014, 10:59:19 PM I saw some untrusted member's profile (and some trusted members) and they have some bad feedback complaining about their attitude.
I mean, all they do was getting on somebody's nerves, right? that doesn't mean that they are a scammer or have potential to be one. :P Title: Re: shouldn't there be a "reputation" system along with "trust" system? Post by: Vod on October 19, 2014, 02:11:19 AM I saw some untrusted member's profile (and some trusted members) and they have some bad feedback complaining about their attitude. I mean, all they do was getting on somebody's nerves, right? that doesn't mean that they are a scammer or have potential to be one. :P Negative trust doesn't mean you are a scammer either. It's how one person feels about the other. Do I trust them? Reputation would easily be bought. Useless as post count. Title: Re: shouldn't there be a "reputation" system along with "trust" system? Post by: --Encrypted-- on October 19, 2014, 02:15:22 AM Reputation would easily be bought. Useless as post count. oh yeah, I forgot about the power of bribery.. :( Title: Re: shouldn't there be a "reputation" system along with "trust" system? Post by: hilariousandco on October 19, 2014, 07:47:20 AM There's an entire sub where you can talk about a users reputation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0
Though that of course can also be abused by trolls or people who don't like you, and creating a self-moderated thread there would be counter-productive. |