Bitcoin Forum

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/11/3/1415045711160/41b32297-895e-469d-9d82-9ade0e1c65e8-460x276.jpeg

GCHQ chief accuses US tech giants of becoming terrorists' "networks of choice"

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/nov/03/privacy-gchq-spying-robert-hannigan (http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/nov/03/privacy-gchq-spying-robert-hannigan)

<< New director of UK eavesdropping agency accuses US tech firms of becoming "networks of choice" for terrorists. >>

Now here's a guy who is a master at FUD.

lol the new chief sounds like a complete idiot. GCHQ is a relic from the cold war that should have been shut down years ago, all this 'terrorism' scaremongering isn't going to fool anybody.

I think it scares a lot of people. If people were smart enough to see through it, they would demand institutions like GCHQ and NSA be dismantled.

The majority can bleat in protest all it wants, wolves don't care.

GHCQ should transparently explain to the public what they claim is the statement that way, lest GHCQ as NSA wiretapping them everywhere, take action they think is right without any clarification on the action, they become arrogant, people become afraid
government may have used a particular entity to protect its people from terrorism, but of course all have to have rules and limits of authority, if an agency does not have a limit, it could be the state will soon be ousted, beware ...  ::)

Terrorism is not something from the cold war (there were very few terrorist attacks during the cold war), it is very much something from the 21st century.

I think the best way to avoid terrorist attacks is to allow for law enforcement agencies to better communicate with eachother and to allow for better policies to protect places that would likely be of interest to terrorists.

On 9/11 the terrorists did not breach any level of airport security as they used items that were legal to bring onto airplanes to hijack the airplanes