|
Title: - Post by: wmd12311 on June 23, 2012, 10:45:39 AM -
Title: Re: On the efficacy of requiring meaningless content to combat meaningless content Post by: SaintFlow on June 23, 2012, 10:49:40 AM if you disclose the person you want to pm I can bring it to his attention for you.
Title: - Post by: wmd12311 on June 23, 2012, 10:51:49 AM -
Title: - Post by: wmd12311 on June 23, 2012, 10:58:14 AM -
Title: Re: On the efficacy of requiring meaningless content to combat meaningless content Post by: Raoul Duke on June 23, 2012, 11:28:42 AM Related: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=15911.msg984016#msg984016
Title: Re: On the efficacy of requiring meaningless content to combat meaningless content Post by: kokjo on June 23, 2012, 11:31:05 AM another hour, another newbie crying.
Title: - Post by: wmd12311 on June 23, 2012, 12:00:09 PM -
Title: Re: On the efficacy of requiring meaningless content to combat meaningless content Post by: kokjo on June 23, 2012, 12:36:20 PM Get off my thread! And hey I'm not crying, I'm whining :P GET OFF OUR FORUM! :PTitle: Re: On the efficacy of requiring meaningless content to combat meaningless content Post by: SaintFlow on June 23, 2012, 01:46:54 PM How do I make "Total time logged in" increment? It appears leaving the forum open in a tab is insufficient requires lurking. It also assures that you might give yourself a chance to read some of the standard material so you will not cause questions that have been asked before. Unfortunate if you did all your lurking in the past without being registered |