Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Armory => Topic started by: solitude on December 18, 2014, 10:26:50 PM



Title: Is an Armory update on the horizon?
Post by: solitude on December 18, 2014, 10:26:50 PM
I hate redundant updates that fix little to nothing, and I can't seem to find anything wrong with Armory, but is there an update planned?

Hasn't 0.92.3 been out for awhile?


Title: Re: Is an Armory update on the horizon?
Post by: goatpig on December 19, 2014, 08:28:52 PM
Should have a testing release out in early January for 0.93


Title: Re: Is an Armory update on the horizon?
Post by: teste on December 19, 2014, 11:15:31 PM
And what will be the new features of 0.93 release?


Title: Re: Is an Armory update on the horizon?
Post by: bitpop on December 22, 2014, 11:27:32 AM
Possibly real hd but I really don't want to update my wallets


Title: Re: Is an Armory update on the horizon?
Post by: goatpig on December 22, 2014, 01:57:23 PM
And what will be the new features of 0.93 release?

Overhauled the backend. Now comes with new DB engine, lots of scalability (can now load monster wallets/addresses), and a ton of bug fixes (probably a few new ones too =P).
This in turn allows for Supernode, and a lot of progress for Litenode (but no Litenode in this version)

Possibly real hd but I really don't want to update my wallets

BIP32 wallets won't hit this release, that will be for the next one, which should follow close behind however.



Title: Re: Is an Armory update on the horizon?
Post by: doug_armory on December 24, 2014, 05:08:25 PM
And what will be the new features of 0.93 release?

Overhauled the backend. Now comes with new DB engine, lots of scalability (can now load monster wallets/addresses), and a ton of bug fixes (probably a few new ones too =P).
This in turn allows for Supernode, and a lot of progress for Litenode (but no Litenode in this version)

I believe deterministic signing will also be in the next release. The dev branch got that code three months ago. I also added a couple of features to the OSX build that were missing for technical reasons.