|
Title: Filtering taint vs. shunning green Post by: cbeast on June 28, 2012, 02:18:46 AM Since it appears that taint is detectable can I then presume that transactions from tainted addresses can be then ignored? If so, then if green addresses are forced upon a population, can they also be considered taint and ignored. Would it then follow that any tainted or forced addresses could then be forced into a forked block chain by those that oppose those practices?
Title: Re: Filtering taint vs. shunning green Post by: BasementMiner! on June 28, 2012, 05:09:27 AM Can I have your donation address?
*sends tainted satoshi* Title: Re: Filtering taint vs. shunning green Post by: cbeast on June 28, 2012, 10:45:49 AM Can I have your donation address? I could alway isolate that from my wallet and not use it. That doesn't answer my questions.*sends tainted satoshi* Title: Re: Filtering taint vs. shunning green Post by: amencon on June 28, 2012, 04:10:04 PM Sorry I only skimmed through your 3 sentence post but I'm going to go with ... no.
|