Bitcoin Forum

A word of advice, chaps. The next time you head off for a night out on the tiles, don’t forget to take everything you might need with you.


Wallet, phone and, if you hope to get lucky later on, maybe a packet of condoms and, of course, a legal consent form, an alcohol breath test kit, two independent witnesses, preferably female, and a lawyer to verify that the lady in question has indeed consented to sex and also that she was in a condition to give that consent knowingly and soberly.

Thanks to the newly announced overhaul of how the Crown Prosecution Service should treat rape cases, this is what a typical Friday night out will soon involve for any man who doesn’t fancy facing rape charges the morning after the night before. According to Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions, the concept of “No means No” just doesn’t hack it anymore.

It turns out that Yes sometimes means No too, particularly when a woman is judged to be too inebriated to be capable of making a conscious decision. If she’s three sheets to the wind, then the new rule is that she is not capable of consenting to get between the sheets.

Even if she has said Yes and has even undressed herself or initiated the sexual advances. Even if she at no point suggested she had changed her mind or asked the man to stop. Even if she blatantly enjoyed herself at the time.


http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/01/29/the-new-rape-rules-which-will-infantilise-women-and-criminalise-innocent-men/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Singularity is upon us... (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urS8GmwmeWQ)

Reminded of the old Catholic church monarchy virginity tests, where a bunch of pervs would watch the "first time".

Well... I guess that pendulum has totally swung to that other side, according to that article  8)

good thing i'm celibate

Can the witnesses be hired off the street?

Please tell me this isn't actually going to happen, weren't we all worrying about this kind of bullshit actually becoming reality awhile back? That we'd need to travel around with a fucking lawyer just to ask a girl out?

You can still enjoy 'women' in the Philippines without a lawyer or asking a girl out... 8)

https://i.imgur.com/tl763TL.jpg

Even your wife can accuse you of rape.

*starts searching up flights to asia*

I love how you put women in quotations.  ;D

http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/small/0808/ladyboys-demotivational-poster-1217934875.jpg

 :)

It's the system desperately trying to balance itself out. To western/developed countries it definitely feels unfair but with the world tending to 'oneness' you gotta look at the system as a whole. Statistically rape cases are overwhelmingly in favor of men. In places like India, gang-raping women is a daily business and most of the time the men get away with it. In the rare cases where the woman wins, she still loses because her life within society is pretty much over anyway.

So if this is the case, and you have all that information, how come all those feminists can't read the same data and help their sisters out in india and in all those countries women are killed and stoned to death on a whim?

Let me give you some examples:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777707.0


Oneness to the image of whom?

Rape is rape.  Being married doesn't mean the end of rape charges for the wife or the husband.  But wife against husband rapes... well  call me old fashioned or maybe even the science seems sketchy

Are people expected to have consensual contracts, perhaps even live-in lawyers and witnesses to protect them from their own spouse too?  ???

My wife and I made a deal with each other, that neither one of us will EVER deny the other sex, even if we're not really in the mood. (Excluding any painful, weird or kinky stuff.) It's not penned on paper though, so I suppose she can renege any time she wants. Call ME old fashioned, but I consider a marriage certificate (or its equivalent) an eternal consent form. (At least until death or divorce do you part.)

Being married doesn't take away a person's right to say no to sex.

Sometimes I wish I could be 10, 15, maybe 20 years younger, but then I see this type of stuff and am glad I got to live through better times.
Have fun tonight kids...   :D

Perfectly sums it up.  The English have been reduced to children.  That's the last stop before pre-life--or perhaps more aptly called death (http://www.scottmanning.com/content/communist-body-count/).  But hey, at least then, you'll finally be perfect equals and the egalitarian dream will be realized.

The octopus is very smart animal. Yet they are not dominating the world because each new generation has to relearn everything from scratch as the mother dies a few hours after baby octopus are born.

Sometime I ask myself if we are not making the same relearn experience every whatever centuries...

I do not condone rape and respect everyone's right to say no, but don't be surprised when your relationship turns sour and you find your spouse goes elsewhere to get it or your marriage ends in divorce. Seriously, it only takes a few minutes and will do wonders for your relationship.

As a fair warning you're probably not gonna like what I'm about to say  :D
 
First off, a 'cause' that needs defending is never worth fighting for. A truly legitimate 'cause' exists in and of itself without any perceived external support. The only analogy that can adequately paint a picture of this statement is this: The seamless integration of life with it's environment in a virgin (human-free) ecosystem.
The reason feminists are not rushing over to help their 'sisters' is simple, they're fighting a cause borne of artificiality which means they need to draw the line somewhere. And this line will invariably be at a safe distance from their physical selves (here I mean physical as an all-encompassing self). 

Now my answer to your second question is gonna stretch the limits of credibility even further.
I'll start off with the grounds for oneness. This is pure logic and shouldn't be hard to grasp. Humans have been treading the path of knowledge for a while now. The nature of knowledge is to systematically swallow and incorporate into itself everything it encounters. Since the earth is only finite, it was always going to be a matter of time before awareness seeped into every nook and cranny. We are now in the age of unification with the 'world' working to strengthen the bind on its parts and concretizing it's 'self'. Cars, planes, ships (etc) for the physical aspect and books, phones and internet (etc) for mental. One world.

It would've been easier if you hadn't included that last bit 'to the image of whom'  :D The answer is 'the world'. Emergence of sentience.

If I understand you correctly:


A) Earth/Gaia is better off without humans. Even though Gaia, as far as science tells us in 2015, is responsible for the creation of humans through a slow process of millions of years of evolution... The seamless integration of life with it's environment in a virgin (human-free) ecosystem.


B) The third wave feminists draw a line that is strangely compatible with other third wave feminists that are able to use the same tools to define their all-encompassing cosmos: twitter feeds and facebook 'friends'. If you cannot have the $$$ for the latest smart phone, a high speed internet connection, or if english is not your first language, then you are out of this beautiful all-encompassing third wave feminist universe, A.K.A. the Coca Cola, Pepsi, Apple, Google, 500 channels cable subscription on your latest Samsung LED 4K UHD TV, grass juice every morning, only cooking in FAIR TRADE coconut oil, groupon, Pilates exercises before jumping to the subway, listening to spotify while reading what oprah told the third wave feminist to read on their kindle... ... universe.


C) Oneness is defined by: Cars, planes, ships (etc) for the physical aspect and books, phones and internet (etc) for mental. One world.. If you are a woman and you carry your produce on your head for 20 miles, bare foot, to meet potential buyers to the village's market, everyday, you are not part of Oneness. The flies bothering your little donkey carrying 100s of pounds of your hard labor are not part of Oneness either. Actually you WILL be part of Oneness, voluntary or not, as Oneness is whatever the 'superior culture' is when it destroys and swallow you whole, you and your traditions, your little donkey, flies included. BUT the swallowing will be for the good of your tribe. Oneness will tell you to stop killing those cute seals you used to feed yourself on because it is barbaric and uncooked... Oneness will tell you how many you can kill per month, then will send you food stamps for that brand new mini market shaped as a container it has sent you... Oneness will tell you no one from your village is free to roam in 'your' forest anymore, the way your ancestors did for thousands of years, as it is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site...


No fair warning for all those indigenous people around the globe, they probably not gonna like what your definition of Oneness is about to do to them, as Oneness is a pretty small club of narrow minded selfish bunch of Caramel Brulée Frappuccino® Blended Coffee drinking humans with a Wifi connection...

8)

You say that as your defense in court, and I'll vote to convict on a charge of rape, no question. That's an indefensible attitude.

Settle down, I'm not a rapist. Naturally I respect everyone's right to say no, even though I don't quite understand it. If you're not happy with your spouse you need to get that shit sorted out and if you can't then just seperate. I get that this is an unpopular opinion and that I'm an easy target for a SJW, but if you are in a happy and healthy relationship, explain to me the reason for denying your partner sex. If indeed you are just too tired or not in the mood it still won't kill you to sacrifice a few minutes to keep your partner happy.

Instead of just saying no means no, which I've already admitted that I respect, perhaps you can better explain your reasoning behind why you would refuse sex to your partner, while still maintaining a healthy relationship with them.

Your stance is commendable and noble  :)

However you underestimate the implications of my comment.

Knowledge, therefore the current world, thrives exclusively on 'differences'. If everything is the same, then there is nothing to learn and the illusion of power fades.
Money (is power | includes all forms of barter be it physical or emotional) is the primary means for spreading knowledge. Humans can be from any walks of life and belong to any schools of thought but the underlying structure that supports the (human) way of life is the same for all: knowledge. If knowledge thrives on differences then it's not hard to imagine that the greater the differences the more knowledge there exists. And if knowledge is synonymous with power, then the greater the differences the more power there exists.
In the context of the current world, money only works because of the difference between the rich and poor. The bigger the gap between those 2 extremities the more knowledge the 'world' gains, the faster science progresses.
Outwardly it would appear that rich people are privileged and have it easy but this is only the age-old illusion of 'the grass is always greener on the other side'. Rich people long for freedom and poor people long for money. Truth is nobody has a say in any of this, not really anyway. For as long as you play the game of knowledge, you will be bound by its terms whether you be a fat cat or a lowly peasant.

We obviously belong to the rich people class as we both know what a bitcoin is, what a frappuccino is, what buying fair trade coconut oil means. For very poor people, having $10000 or $100000 or $1000000 or $1000000000 of asset is the same for them, when they look at us.

We love our definition of Oneness. "Oneness to the image of whom?" I asked. The answer was simple: our image.


Rich people long for not losing the power they have, poor people long for happiness they've yet to have...

 8)