Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Electrum => Topic started by: ThomasV on February 03, 2015, 03:58:13 PM



Title: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on February 03, 2015, 03:58:13 PM
Packages are available here: https://electrum.org/beta/
The first beta was released on Sunday. There was no thread in this forum because the forum was down.

Windows and OSX binaries will be available soon.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0b2 beta version
Post by: Tachikoma on February 03, 2015, 06:16:51 PM
Windows and OSX Binaries should be uploaded.

Please note that no portable windows builds are available for the beta and that debugging is enabled on windows by default, this to help diagnose potential problems.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0b2 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on February 03, 2015, 10:11:22 PM
Windows and OSX Binaries should be uploaded.
thanks for that!


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: bitcats on February 04, 2015, 04:35:16 PM
Thanks for the new release :)

I might have found a bug: Created invoices can't be exported or copied to the clipboard (QR). * Win 7/64

http://up.picr.de/20891266zl.jpg


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on February 04, 2015, 04:43:41 PM
I might have found a bug: Created invoices can't be exported or copied to the clipboard (QR). * Win 7/64
thanks for mentioning that. indeed that's missing.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: bitcats on February 04, 2015, 05:00:09 PM
Does the "importprivkey" command still work?


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: redsn0w on February 04, 2015, 05:03:02 PM
I might have found a bug: Created invoices can't be exported or copied to the clipboard (QR). * Win 7/64
thanks for mentioning that. indeed that's missing.

Is there any bug bounty or not ? I only would like to know, thanks for the attention.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: abety876 on February 04, 2015, 08:00:22 PM
anyone else having an issue with all their plugins being greyed out?


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on February 04, 2015, 08:11:34 PM
Does the "importprivkey" command still work?

you need to create a special wallet, that will contain only imported keys.
see https://electrum.orain.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_import_addresses_from_other_Bitcoin_clients.3F


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on February 04, 2015, 08:16:37 PM
anyone else having an issue with all their plugins being greyed out?

Some plugins are be greyed out because they are not available for your current wallet; you need to create a new wallet for them.
For example, Trezor or two factor authentication require special wallets.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: alexrossi on February 05, 2015, 10:04:10 AM
What command now i need to use to increase the gap limit?


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on February 05, 2015, 10:22:12 AM
What command now i need to use to increase the gap limit?

There is no proper command, because I don't want to encourage users doing that.
But you can do this in the python console:

Code:
wallet.change_gap_limit(n)



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: arorts on February 07, 2015, 04:37:03 AM
Hi,

My wallet is stuck in "Synchronizing". Any idea?? I already restarted it and tried to use different servers.

Is there any specific port number I should connect to? Currently it says "50001" eventhough is in auto-connect.

Thanks



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: Muhammed Zakir on February 07, 2015, 07:18:16 AM
Hi,

My wallet is stuck in "Synchronizing". Any idea?? I already restarted it and tried to use different servers.

Is there any specific port number I should connect to? Currently it says "50001" eventhough is in auto-connect.

Thanks

Please don't make two similar posts. :) Try to connect to a server manually. There was no such problem for me.

   -MZ


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: fireduck on February 07, 2015, 07:30:52 PM
I've just done some testing and my alternative server (Jelectrum) seems to work with 2.0b2 without issue.

There are some new (and old) methods that my server doesn't support, but 2.0b2 doesn't seem to call them:

blockchain.address.listunspent
blockchain.address.get_balance
blockchain.address.get_proof
blockchain.address.get_mempool
blockchain.utxo.get_address

https://github.com/fireduck64/jelectrum



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 12, 2015, 01:58:54 AM
I'm running Electrum Beta 2.0b2 under Windows 7 Home Edition. When I start the program I get a popup that says "Runtime Error! R6034 An Application has made an attempt to load the C runtime library incorrectly. ..." It still runs but I get that error. Just FYI. Can anything be done about it?



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 12, 2015, 03:16:35 AM
What exactly is the Encrypt/Decrypt message function and how is it supposed to work? I've played with it but I can't seem to get it to do anything.



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: alexrossi on February 12, 2015, 10:55:49 AM
What exactly is the Encrypt/Decrypt message function and how is it supposed to work? I've played with it but I can't seem to get it to do anything.



You can encrypt a message with the private key of an address in your wallet


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 12, 2015, 11:39:12 AM
What exactly is the Encrypt/Decrypt message function and how is it supposed to work? I've played with it but I can't seem to get it to do anything.



You can encrypt a message with the private key of an address in your wallet

Thanks for the answer but what is the purpose of doing so?



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: Muhammed Zakir on February 12, 2015, 11:44:30 AM
What exactly is the Encrypt/Decrypt message function and how is it supposed to work? I've played with it but I can't seem to get it to do anything.



You can encrypt a message with the private key of an address in your wallet

Thanks for the answer but what is the purpose of doing so?


It works like PGP. I hope you're familiar with it. If someone want to send you a message and he thinks others will somehow see it, he can encrypt it with your public key. So only you can decrypt the message and see it as you have the private key of the address. Two additional features to signing and verifying messages. I hope you understand!

   -MZ


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 12, 2015, 06:49:38 PM
What exactly is the Encrypt/Decrypt message function and how is it supposed to work? I've played with it but I can't seem to get it to do anything.



You can encrypt a message with the private key of an address in your wallet

Thanks for the answer but what is the purpose of doing so?


It works like PGP. I hope you're familiar with it. If someone want to send you a message and he thinks others will somehow see it, he can encrypt it with your public key. So only you can decrypt the message and see it as you have the private key of the address. Two additional features to signing and verifying messages. I hope you understand!

   -MZ

Got it! Thanks! I've been using PGP since it's inception so I'm well familiar with it. Hence my interest in this feature.



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: oda.krell on February 17, 2015, 02:26:35 PM
Can I have a brief advice on what I should expect if I start using the beta?
 
As in: can I use it for my "main" wallet, or would that be a security risk I rather shouldn't take?


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: MadGamer on February 17, 2015, 02:28:31 PM
Is there is any changelog page ? I would like to see what are the Upcoming changes , would be nice to see more features on this wallet


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 18, 2015, 12:21:59 PM
Is there any news on the status of the beta? It's looking good here except the proxy part isn't working. Is this the best place to report bugs/errors or is there a better place to report errors?

UPDATE!! I see a new beta was posted yesterday! I'm getting ready to look at it now.





Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 18, 2015, 12:37:43 PM
I tried installing the new beta and I get the following error(s):

C:\Users\xxxxxxxxx\Desktop\Electrum-2.0b3>python setup.py sdist
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 5, in <module>
    from setuptools import setup
ImportError: No module named setuptools



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: Muhammed Zakir on February 18, 2015, 12:58:33 PM
I tried installing the new beta and I get the following error(s):

C:\Users\xxxxxxxxx\Desktop\Electrum-2.0b3>python setup.py sdist
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 5, in <module>
    from setuptools import setup
ImportError: No module named setuptools

You haven't installed setuptools. Use ez_setup.py(recommended) : http://svn.python.org/projects/sandbox/branches/setuptools-0.6/#egg=setuptools-dev06 , alternatively, you can try windows installers : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools/0.6c11#downloads.

   -MZ


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 18, 2015, 01:08:55 PM
I tried installing the new beta and I get the following error(s):

C:\Users\xxxxxxxxx\Desktop\Electrum-2.0b3>python setup.py sdist
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 5, in <module>
    from setuptools import setup
ImportError: No module named setuptools

You haven't installed setuptools. Use ez_setup.py(recommended) : http://svn.python.org/projects/sandbox/branches/setuptools-0.6/#egg=setuptools-dev06 , alternatively, you can try windows installers : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools/0.6c11#downloads.

   -MZ

Thanks! I'll give it a shot. This is my first time to try Electrum without a Windows installer :)



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 18, 2015, 01:51:21 PM
Awesome! Just when I was going to go back and re-download the new .zip file, I see there is a new Windows executable! Yay!! Now all we need is a changelog so we can see what was done! (hint hint)



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: Mitchell on February 18, 2015, 01:57:38 PM
you need to create a special wallet, that will contain only imported keys.
see https://electrum.orain.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_import_addresses_from_other_Bitcoin_clients.3F
Could you guys explain the reasoning behind this and is their anyway around it? I have some imported addresses that are important to me, so I'm going to stick with 1.9.8 for now, I guess.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: Muhammed Zakir on February 18, 2015, 01:59:13 PM
Awesome! Just when I was going to go back and re-download the new .zip file, I see there is a new Windows executable! Yay!! Now all we need is a changelog so we can see what was done! (hint hint)

That's good news! Were you successful in installing setup tools and Electrum?

Tip: If you find line like ImportError: No module named setuptools. Copy the last word and search in Google, i.e., setuptools python.

   -MZ


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 18, 2015, 04:14:08 PM
Here are some notes from my preliminary tests on the new beta.

There is still an error on start up with the C Runtime Library loading correctly:

http://www.jpunix.net/Electrum/Electrum_Error.jpg

Additionally when I try to set up a proxy so that Electrum runs through TOR using "localhost" and port 9050 I get the following recursive error. Please note that TOR is working perfectly with all other applications.

http://www.jpunix.net/Electrum/Proxy_Error.jpg

I'm running Windows 7 Premium Home Edition.



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: MadGamer on February 18, 2015, 06:19:48 PM
Could anyone please answer my question that I posted above
Thank you . any answer is appreciated a lot

Quote
Is there is any changelog page ? I would like to see what are the Upcoming changes , would be nice to see more features on this wallet


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on February 18, 2015, 07:02:07 PM
Could anyone please answer my question that I posted above
Thank you . any answer is appreciated a lot

Quote
Is there is any changelog page ? I would like to see what are the Upcoming changes , would be nice to see more features on this wallet

see https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: Tachikoma on February 20, 2015, 09:12:07 AM
Here are some notes from my preliminary tests on the new beta.

There is still an error on start up with the C Runtime Library loading correctly:

http://www.jpunix.net/Electrum/Electrum_Error.jpg


Any other output? Does the terminal window open at all? Kinda hard to debug this error without more output.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on February 20, 2015, 11:32:18 AM


Any other output? Does the terminal window open at all? Kinda hard to debug this error without more output.

Yes. The terminal window opens up fine. Everything runs. I just get this error on startup. Sorry I wasn't more clear.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: rgenito on February 20, 2015, 06:12:52 PM
Will 2.0 support BIP39 ?

And does anyone here know the deterministic path for electrum? Before looking at the code, I'm just gunna guess it's m/0'/0/0 or something similar ;D


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: tl121 on February 20, 2015, 06:52:39 PM
Here are some notes from my preliminary tests on the new beta.

There is still an error on start up with the C Runtime Library loading correctly:

http://www.jpunix.net/Electrum/Electrum_Error.jpg


Any other output? Does the terminal window open at all? Kinda hard to debug this error without more output.

If this error window pops up, clicking in the error window will dismiss it and electrum will run OK. This can happen with Windows 7 or 8.1. If msvcr90.dll is in the electrum directory (or on the user's path) certain versions will cause an error when running the beta. I could find no rime or reason for which versions worked and which ones gave the warning.  I have more than two dozen versions of this .dll on my system and some work and some do not. It does not seem to correlate to the program version number, file size or file modification date.



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on February 23, 2015, 09:10:53 AM
Thanks to all beta testers! Electrum 2.0 will be released this week. Expect us.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: Tafelpoot on February 23, 2015, 02:18:47 PM
Congrats Thomas, looking forward!
It hurt a bit to see bip39 got kicked, however I fully agree it is the best way to go.
I got some other projects occupying me atm, but I'll be back soon (2 weeks ;) ) to help with kivy!


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: jackbox on February 23, 2015, 05:18:10 PM
Thanks to all beta testers! Electrum 2.0 will be released this week. Expect us.

Will it support Trezor? Beta 2.0b3 seems to have Trezor hardware wallet support removed.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: rgenito on February 24, 2015, 03:37:24 AM
wait... bip39 got kicked from electrum? does this mean we cannot use 12 word phrases? =[


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: nezroy on February 24, 2015, 05:02:47 PM
you need to create a special wallet, that will contain only imported keys.
see https://electrum.orain.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_import_addresses_from_other_Bitcoin_clients.3F
Could you guys explain the reasoning behind this? I'm going to stick with 1.9.8 for now, because I have some imported addresses that are important to me.

I haven't looked at the code but at a quick guess I'd assume this is related to the change to HD wallets/BIP32. From the answer to the item you linked, "you cannot import addresses in a wallet that has a seed. You need to create a special wallet, that does not have a seed" -- the seed creates deterministic addresses in an HD/BIP32 wallet. So to handle the import of one-off addresses they have taken the route that you need a separate, non-HD wallet to hold them.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ticoti on February 24, 2015, 06:46:18 PM
Thanks to all beta testers! Electrum 2.0 will be released this week. Expect us.
nice! it has been a long waiting, I want it for my hardware wallet


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: Abdussamad on March 01, 2015, 03:06:43 AM
On debian 7 I get the following errors:

- When restoring a wallet using the command line the restore is successful but I get an assert error.

Quote
Exception in thread Thread-2 (most likely raised during interpreter shutdown):
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 552, in __bootstrap_inner
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/electrum/verifier.py", line 115, in run
<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'Empty'

- I've installed the python-zbar package. Clicking tools > load transaction > from qr code leads to an error the first time I do it:

Quote
"ERROR: zbar processor in _zbar_video_open():
    system error: opening video device '/dev/video0': No such file or directory (2)"

Second time it causes a segmentation fault and electrum crashes.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on March 01, 2015, 07:58:36 PM
While we're waiting for the Electrum 2.0 official release I was wondering... Will Electrum 2.0 have a "portable" version or mode? When I travel I like to have my wallet on a USB drive.



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on March 01, 2015, 09:30:02 PM
2.0 has been tagged!
see https://twitter.com/ElectrumWallet/status/572020854567149568


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: japerry on March 01, 2015, 11:22:26 PM
2.0 has been tagged!
see https://twitter.com/ElectrumWallet/status/572020854567149568

Pardon my confusion. I don't use Twitter. What's "tagged"?



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: btchris on March 02, 2015, 12:35:31 AM
2.0 has been tagged!
see https://twitter.com/ElectrumWallet/status/572020854567149568
Pardon my confusion. I don't use Twitter. What's "tagged"?

It's more a github term (https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/releases/tag/2.0) than a twitter term, it just means the source code has been finalized and the installers are just around the corner.


Congrats!!



Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: wosch76 on March 02, 2015, 01:33:17 PM
Thanks to all beta testers! Electrum 2.0 will be released this week. Expect us.
nice! it has been a long waiting, I want it for my hardware wallet
me too. I'm so excited  :)


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: ThomasV on March 02, 2015, 01:49:00 PM
The Electrum website has been updated for version 2.0: https://electrum.org
Windows and OSX executables will be added soon.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: tl121 on March 14, 2015, 10:13:58 PM
The Electrum website has been updated for version 2.0: https://electrum.org
Windows and OSX executables will be added soon.

I had a problem with Animazing's signature of electrum-2.0.2-setup.exe.  I did not have a problem with Animazing's signature of electrum-2.0.2.exe so I don't believe this relates to my PGP software.


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: Tachikoma on March 15, 2015, 10:02:36 AM
The Electrum website has been updated for version 2.0: https://electrum.org
Windows and OSX executables will be added soon.

I had a problem with Animazing's signature of electrum-2.0.2-setup.exe.  I did not have a problem with Animazing's signature of electrum-2.0.2.exe so I don't believe this relates to my PGP software.


Sorry about that, I've remade the binaries at one point to fix a problem with Trezor support. Could you try downloading the signature again now and seeing if it fits?


Title: Re: Electrum 2.0 beta version
Post by: tl121 on March 15, 2015, 07:12:54 PM
The Electrum website has been updated for version 2.0: https://electrum.org
Windows and OSX executables will be added soon.

I had a problem with Animazing's signature of electrum-2.0.2-setup.exe.  I did not have a problem with Animazing's signature of electrum-2.0.2.exe so I don't believe this relates to my PGP software.


Sorry about that, I've remade the binaries at one point to fix a problem with Trezor support. Could you try downloading the signature again now and seeing if it fits?

The new version fixed the signature problem. Thanks.