Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: Peter Todd on July 21, 2012, 06:00:46 PM



Title: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Peter Todd on July 21, 2012, 06:00:46 PM
Lets suppose the speculation is true, and the Pirate has in fact been selling large amounts of coin. Ostensibly this is to stop bubbles, but another possibility is he's gradually converting a large amount of his bitcoin holdings into fiat. One he's done that he then has the incentive to crash the bitcoin market as his Bitcoin Savings and Trust obligations are denominated in Bitcoins. For instance, suppose he's a FinCEN insider and known's that repressive anti-bitcoin measures are about to be introduced. After the crash he simply has to buy back the coins at much-reduced rates, and he gets to keep the fiat left over as his profits.

tl;dr - The Pirate has a big incentive to destroy Bitcoin itself.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Spekulatius on July 21, 2012, 06:13:31 PM
besides the FinCen insider tohubohu, wha's the period of time pirate has to notice his lenders before he can seize the BS&T operation to stay in legal boundaries?


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: ElectricMucus on July 21, 2012, 06:17:34 PM
destroying btc != crashing the market

all it would do is making gpu mining unprofitable again.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: ArticMine on July 21, 2012, 07:05:52 PM
The market price is, over the long term and once the short term effect of speculation is factored out, equal to the success or failure of Bitcoin. This is a direct result of the intrinsic design of Bitcoin.

As for pirate he is in a position where he can easily have a multi million USD short position on Bitcoin and consequently is in an ideal position to profit very well from a complete collapse of Bitcoin. No need for "insider" information from FinCen or anywhere else. The flip side is that a sudden very sharp increase in the market price of Bitcoin could also hurt him substantially. As for the market activity and comments that are attributed to him, this is to me indicative of a bear under a lot of pressure and possibly hurting in a bull market.

The one thing to keep in mind here is that a wounded bear is the most dangerous kind of bear.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Spekulatius on July 21, 2012, 07:13:20 PM
he already fights for survival:

- lowering the dividends about 30%
- participating for the first time in market manipulation (on the 17th of July, according to his statement on IRC)
- increased forum activity, spreading (mis)information, trying to foster trust in his endeavour
...


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: boonies4u on July 21, 2012, 07:23:00 PM
I don't think it is a matter of if he is not profiting from this endeavor, at this point. It seems to be that the concern is whether or not that this will have a lasting affect on the bitcoin economy.

I find it kind of ironic that people are going to complain about the price being held down, while people still complain about early adopter benefits.

Pirate is essentially giving everyone (including investors, clients, and potential bitcoin buyers) a chance to buy cheap coins.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: ElectricMucus on July 21, 2012, 07:27:57 PM
hahaha

NO


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: ArticMine on July 21, 2012, 08:08:46 PM
I don't think it is a matter of if he is not profiting from this endeavor, at this point. It seems to be that the concern is whether or not that this will have a lasting affect on the bitcoin economy.

I find it kind of ironic that people are going to complain about the price being held down, while people still complain about early adopter benefits.

Pirate is essentially giving everyone (including investors, clients, and potential bitcoin buyers) a chance to buy cheap coins.

Here, I think it wasn't clear enough.  ;)

This has indeed been the case for the last 7 months; however over the long term this is completely unsustainable. Something will have to give. The worst thing a pirate detractor can do is dismiss him as a ponzi or a money launderer, because this essentially limits the threat to his lenders and no one else.

The reason I am sounding a warning here is because I actually trust he is telling the truth.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Frankie on July 21, 2012, 08:18:07 PM
Lets suppose the speculation is true, and the Pirate has in fact been selling large amounts of coin. Ostensibly this is to stop bubbles, but another possibility is he's gradually converting a large amount of his bitcoin holdings into fiat. One he's done that he then has the incentive to crash the bitcoin market as his Bitcoin Savings and Trust obligations are denominated in Bitcoins. For instance, suppose he's a FinCEN insider and known's that repressive anti-bitcoin measures are about to be introduced. After the crash he simply has to buy back the coins at much-reduced rates, and he gets to keep the fiat left over as his profits.

tl;dr - The Pirate has a big incentive to destroy Bitcoin itself.


Why would he have that incentive?

It seems that he does have an incentive to liquidate before getting the hell out of Dodge, because popping the confidence of his army of believers will probably drive the price down short term. But the incentive to cash out =! incentive to "destroy Bitcoin itself."


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: ArticMine on July 21, 2012, 08:31:39 PM
Lets suppose the speculation is true, and the Pirate has in fact been selling large amounts of coin. Ostensibly this is to stop bubbles, but another possibility is he's gradually converting a large amount of his bitcoin holdings into fiat. One he's done that he then has the incentive to crash the bitcoin market as his Bitcoin Savings and Trust obligations are denominated in Bitcoins. For instance, suppose he's a FinCEN insider and known's that repressive anti-bitcoin measures are about to be introduced. After the crash he simply has to buy back the coins at much-reduced rates, and he gets to keep the fiat left over as his profits.

tl;dr - The Pirate has a big incentive to destroy Bitcoin itself.


Why would he have that incentive?

It seems that he does have an incentive to liquidate before getting the hell out of Dodge, because popping the confidence of his army of believers will probably drive the price down short term. But the incentive to cash out =! incentive to "destroy Bitcoin itself."

Because he is short the market. Suppose you had 2.5 million USD and a debt denominated in Zimbabwean dollars at an interest rate of 7% a week that initially was valued at 2.5 million USD. Would you close out the position. No. You let the position ride and then pick up 500 trillion Zimbabwean dollars for say 50 USD on Ebay and use it to pay the principle and interest on your Zimbabwean dollar debt. The profit is the difference between what you sold your Zimbabwean dollars short initially 2.5 million USD and what you paid to buy back your position 50 USD.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: FreeMoney on July 21, 2012, 08:32:18 PM
Lets suppose the speculation is true, and the Pirate has in fact been selling large amounts of coin. Ostensibly this is to stop bubbles, but another possibility is he's gradually converting a large amount of his bitcoin holdings into fiat. One he's done that he then has the incentive to crash the bitcoin market as his Bitcoin Savings and Trust obligations are denominated in Bitcoins. For instance, suppose he's a FinCEN insider and known's that repressive anti-bitcoin measures are about to be introduced. After the crash he simply has to buy back the coins at much-reduced rates, and he gets to keep the fiat left over as his profits.

tl;dr - The Pirate has a big incentive to destroy Bitcoin itself.


Why would he have that incentive?

It seems that he does have an incentive to liquidate before getting the hell out of Dodge, because popping the confidence of his army of believers will probably drive the price down short term. But the incentive to cash out =! incentive to "destroy Bitcoin itself."

There is obviously some incentive to hurt bitcoin when you owe hundreds of thousands of them. Any real hurt certainly will lower the value of what you owe. But if he had some inside info or ability why wait to freaking long? I don't think he has any intention like that whether he is legit or not.



Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: FreeMoney on July 21, 2012, 08:49:15 PM
You can edit the post if you want. And even delete the separate post.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: boonies4u on July 21, 2012, 08:56:28 PM
I don't think it is a matter of if he is not profiting from this endeavor, at this point. It seems to be that the concern is whether or not that this will have a lasting affect on the bitcoin economy.

I find it kind of ironic that people are going to complain about the price being held down, while people still complain about early adopter benefits.

Pirate is essentially giving everyone (including investors, clients, and potential bitcoin buyers) a chance to buy cheap coins.

Here, I think it wasn't clear enough.  ;)

This has indeed been the case for the last 7 months; however over the long term this is completely unsustainable. Something will have to give. The worst thing a pirate detractor can do is dismiss him as a ponzi or a money launderer, because this essentially limits the threat to his lenders and no one else.

The reason I am sounding a warning here is because I actually trust he is telling the truth.

If Pirate is using his mass of coins to hold the market down, that might be hurting the sellers and miners now, but if anything it's a reason to not sell now anyways. A good chance to pick up coins, invest them, or hold them.

If you don't want Pirate to manipulate the market, don't loan him the bitcoins.

I suppose the thing to keep in mine is that Pirate could decide to stop at anytime and either run with the coins or force any/every account to withdraw.

If there are these powerful clients of Pirate's that are willing to buy bitcoins at these elevated, but stable prices, it speaks out that bitcoin really is worth more than it is currently selling at.

Hope this isn't hurting the miners too bad.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: ArticMine on July 21, 2012, 09:34:12 PM

If Pirate is using his mass of coins to hold the market down, that might be hurting the sellers and miners now, but if anything it's a reason to not sell now anyways. A good chance to pick up coins, invest them, or hold them.

Absolutely. If one does this then one gets to keep some of the "pirate plunder" as a bonus.

If you don't want Pirate to manipulate the market, don't loan him the bitcoins.

True, but Pirate also did make a very valid point. Reckless over leveraged bulls can and will get burnt here. A buy and hold strategy on the other hand will deter this kind of market manipulation and provide some "pirate plunder" to keep as a bonus.

I suppose the thing to keep in mine is that Pirate could decide to stop at anytime and either run with the coins or force any/every account to withdraw.

This is a huge difference here. If he forces withdrawals because the returns simply are no longer there in a bull market, then of course that is a very positive outcome. Lowering the interest rates was also a very positive first step. One other hand in the case of a Pirate default the Bitcoin community will get a taste of what a "too big to fail" bank failure is like without Ben Bernanke to print more money in order to bail said bank out.

If there are these powerful clients of Pirate's that are willing to buy bitcoins at these elevated, but stable prices, it speaks out that bitcoin really is worth more than it is currently selling at.

Hope this isn't hurting the miners too bad.

It depends on what the the miners do. if they mine and hold and don't sell even to pay for power or equipment costs then they will not loose in the long run. If they mine and sell then they are getting hurt.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Boussac on July 21, 2012, 10:20:49 PM
As for the market activity and comments that are attributed to him, this is to me indicative of a bear under a lot of pressure and possibly hurting in a bull market.

The one thing to keep in mind here is that a wounded bear is the most dangerous kind of bear.

http://www.e-ducat.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/ours.gif


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: ydenys on July 21, 2012, 11:03:06 PM
If I hear about pirate’s scam once again, I’ll puke.

There is plenty of wrong kind of people attracted to Bitcoin for a quick profit – nothing wrong with them being relieved of their money by scammers. That what they are in for, anyway – they come with a 500g tube of Vaseline each. They’ll say they were ‘desperate’ afterwards and most would insist they had actually enjoyed it or ‘came out on top’. Regardless,

Why does it matter to most of us if some loud plonker is disposing of his stolen money and bumholing a bunch of greedy idiots? There had been countless like him before and will be more, and there are plenty of idiots where they came from -  i do not want to think that Bitcoin is about those.

‘Legend’… 'Destroy Bitcoin'... ???


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Frankie on July 21, 2012, 11:31:02 PM
[Why would he have that incentive?

It seems that he does have an incentive to liquidate before getting the hell out of Dodge, because popping the confidence of his army of believers will probably drive the price down short term. But the incentive to cash out =! incentive to "destroy Bitcoin itself."

Because he is short the market. Suppose you had 2.5 million USD and a debt denominated in Zimbabwean dollars at an interest rate of 7% a week that initially was valued at 2.5 million USD. Would you close out the position. No. You let the position ride and then pick up 500 trillion Zimbabwean dollars for say 50 USD on Ebay and use it to pay the principle and interest on your Zimbabwean dollar debt. The profit is the difference between what you sold your Zimbabwean dollars short initially 2.5 million USD and what you paid to buy back your position 50 USD.


Er...  Let's say that this person was anonymous and could not be reached by any court.  Would his stronger incentive be to (1) hold down the value of the Zimbabwean dollar futility until he becomes insolvent, or (2) walk away with the money, in whatever currency he prefers?

This is not a hard question.  You appear to be making the fundamental mistake of believing it's not a scam.

Please think for a second about how senseless this is.  In your view, you think he needs to get more income from whatever his "investment" is, turn it into bitcoins, and pay the "investors."  So yes, in that situation he would want the exchange rate to be low.  But if he had a stack of coins to turn into dollars, doesn't that mean that he didn't actually put them into his "investment" until now?  I mean, you're supposedly loaning him money for some great investment deal--doesn't that mean he needs to actually invest the bitcoins?  If he's got thousands of coins sitting around to manipulate the prices AND more income from his investment, why does he need to pay you guys anything?  He would be self-financing at that point.

The only conclusion is that the investment is mythological.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: PatrickHarnett on July 21, 2012, 11:34:39 PM
Long after BS&T is gone, Bitcoin will still be here, irrespective of price movements.

If you are sure the economy is tied to one person, even if they have a corner or squeeze (or any other market power you like), then you are missing the point.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Technomage on July 21, 2012, 11:36:51 PM
Pirate, pirate, pirate, pirate... omg. Who cares? Every sucker who invests in his trust should expect losing every penny at any moment. Investors are basically gambling against time, will they have time to accumulate enough from the interest before it all breaks down?

Pirate is insignificant PERIOD. I hope he sells bitcoins, that means cheaper bitcoins for everyone else. He has much less power than people think though. The market has other large players besides him and if the market decides we go up, his rumoured "dumps" will mean jack shit.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: ElectricMucus on July 21, 2012, 11:53:01 PM
Pirate, pirate, pirate, pirate... omg. Who cares? Every sucker who invests in his trust should expect losing every penny at any moment. Investors are basically gambling against time, will they have time to accumulate enough from the interest before it all breaks down?

Pirate is insignificant PERIOD. I hope he sells bitcoins, that means cheaper bitcoins for everyone else. He has much less power than people think though. The market has other large players besides him and if the market decides we go up, his rumoured "dumps" will mean jack shit.
+1

that should be added to every pirate thread right at after the OP.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Peter Todd on July 22, 2012, 12:53:09 AM

Because he is short the market. Suppose you had 2.5 million USD and a debt denominated in Zimbabwean dollars at an interest rate of 7% a week that initially was valued at 2.5 million USD. Would you close out the position. No. You let the position ride and then pick up 500 trillion Zimbabwean dollars for say 50 USD on Ebay and use it to pay the principle and interest on your Zimbabwean dollar debt. The profit is the difference between what you sold your Zimbabwean dollars short initially 2.5 million USD and what you paid to buy back your position 50 USD.


Er...  Let's say that this person was anonymous and could not be reached by any court.  Would his stronger incentive be to (1) hold down the value of the Zimbabwean dollar futility until he becomes insolvent, or (2) walk away with the money, in whatever currency he prefers?

This is not a hard question.  You appear to be making the fundamental mistake of believing it's not a scam.

Please think for a second about how senseless this is.  In your view, you think he needs to get more income from whatever his "investment" is, turn it into bitcoins, and pay the "investors."  So yes, in that situation he would want the exchange rate to be low.  But if he had a stack of coins to turn into dollars, doesn't that mean that he didn't actually put them into his "investment" until now?  I mean, you're supposedly loaning him money for some great investment deal--doesn't that mean he needs to actually invest the bitcoins?  If he's got thousands of coins sitting around to manipulate the prices AND more income from his investment, why does he need to pay you guys anything?  He would be self-financing at that point.

The only conclusion is that the investment is mythological.

Lets say this anonymous person, realizes that me might not be as anonymous as he thinks he is... In that scenario, why not hedge your bets by paying back the people who bought into your scam, using a clever method that still lets you walk away with a pile of valuable fiat.

Anyway, even if he is anonymous now, he's taking a risk of getting de-anonyimized as he tries to cash out. Estimates are there are something like a quarter of a million BTC involved in the scam; dumping all that isn't going to be easy.

Of course, note how first half of this process, converting the BTC to fiat, could also be the first step of just taking the money and running, assuming he's confident that he can get away with withdrawing the fiat from the exchanges without any legal trouble.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: ArticMine on July 22, 2012, 01:57:51 AM
Is pirateat40 really anonymous?

In GNU/Linux just open a terminal and type
Code:
whois pirateat40.com

I wonder


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Shadow383 on July 22, 2012, 02:28:18 AM
Lets suppose the speculation is true, and the Pirate has in fact been selling large amounts of coin. Ostensibly this is to stop bubbles, but another possibility is he's gradually converting a large amount of his bitcoin holdings into fiat. One he's done that he then has the incentive to crash the bitcoin market as his Bitcoin Savings and Trust obligations are denominated in Bitcoins. For instance, suppose he's a FinCEN insider and known's that repressive anti-bitcoin measures are about to be introduced. After the crash he simply has to buy back the coins at much-reduced rates, and he gets to keep the fiat left over as his profits.

tl;dr - The Pirate has a big incentive to destroy Bitcoin itself.

Or...

The date at which he's promised to appear in vegas is fast-approaching and he's busy cashing out the remainder of his winnings before he disappears  ;)

To be honest, when I see "Suspected bitcoin ponzi op selling large amounts of bitcoin"
My first thought is not "oh, this must be a terribly clever way to make money semi-legitimately by manipulating the market, how clever!"

I think "I wonder if there's some way for me to short the bollocks off that fund?"


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: elux on July 22, 2012, 02:35:45 AM

To be honest, when I see "Suspected bitcoin ponzi op selling large amounts of bitcoin"
My first thought is not "oh, this must be a terribly clever way to make money semi-legitimately by manipulating the market, how clever!"

I think "I wonder if there's some way for me to short the bollocks off that fund?"

Bets of Bitcoin: Bitcoin Savings and Trust will default before the end of 2012 (http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=433)


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Tomatocage on July 22, 2012, 02:53:38 AM
tl;dr - There's a limit to peoples pursuit of wealth.
Fixed that for you.  And it's still total bullshit.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: notme on July 22, 2012, 04:51:41 AM
Pirate, pirate, pirate, pirate... omg. Who cares? Every sucker who invests in his trust should expect losing every penny at any moment. Investors are basically gambling against time, will they have time to accumulate enough from the interest before it all breaks down?

Pirate is insignificant PERIOD. I hope he sells bitcoins, that means cheaper bitcoins for everyone else. He has much less power than people think though. The market has other large players besides him and if the market decides we go up, his rumoured "dumps" will mean jack shit.

Who cares indeed?  So why the inflammatory language?

Can we move on now?


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Transisto on July 22, 2012, 04:54:59 AM
Lets suppose the speculation is ....
tl;dr - The Pirate has a big incentive to destroy Bitcoin itself.

Please move this to speculation !

Destroy btc ? If pirate is making money one way or the other playing with bitcoin, Why would he kill it all ?
He's already invested into GPUMAX afaik, wouldn't he be sell it before ? ... Well whatever, I don't even know why people responded to this OP.
 ... a few more ignore on my list.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Spekulatius on July 22, 2012, 09:11:18 PM
I think one important aspect has been missed in this thread:

Will he leave with BTC or USD in his pockets??

Option A:

He's running a legitimate business. In this case, when he decides to quit, the first thing he has to do (in order to stay within legal boundaries) is to make sure to have enough BTC funds to pay back his lenders. He may have to buy on the market large amounts to fill potential voids. He then has to announce the end of operations of BS&T (does anybody know what notice period he has to adhere to?). Once all debts are paid off, he can either keep all his remaining BTC, USD or convert one into the other and walk away. We may see a substancial purchase of BTC in advance to his notice, which would be an indicator of his true blue intentions.

Option B:

He's running a ponzi or legitimate business but decides to scam everybody. In that case he will not give prior notice, try to vanish as quickly as possible, preferably before the whole swindle surfaces so he can pocket all the funds without paying anything back. The question now arises: Will he leave with BTC or with USD in his pockets?

1. If he is indeed running a ponzi scheme, the mayor part of his funds will be held in BTC through the influx of BTC from his lenders. To leave the country (because his identity is know) with only a huge amount of bitcoin in his wallet, that still has to go through some bank account to convert into USD is a rather flawed option (lets put any of the BTC for USD in mail services aside, because none of those would have sufficent USD cash reserves to pay out 250k BTC in mail envelopes). He would probably try to convert a significant amount of his BTC denominated funds to USD and withdraw that prior to his exit. The current MtGox withdrawal limits (https://support.mtgox.com/home) are limited to a maximum of 500k USD/month for trusted customers. He would have to give it at least 2 month time to prepare his exit to withdraw 1M USD and maybe some extra from other exchanges to have a reasonable pocket money for his livelong vacation on tropical island. We could in that regard see some 1M USD worth in BTC be sold on the major exchanges (and withdrawn).

2. If he is instead selling large amounts of BTC to an anonymous investor that uses pirate as surrogate, he could decide to pocket the USD from his big brother and default on his BTC debts, duping all his lenders as he walks away with about 2M USD in his pocket. That way the community would have no prior warning and no chance to trace pirate after he vanishes, except for international warrants (likely?). The BTC lent, will be still there, but through various laundering services probably well cleaned off their tracks.

So in conclusion; depending on the scheme he is running, one can only hope, that he is a good pirate at heart, because in both cases he could just sail away with all the money and leave nothing behind. But honestly, what pirate has ever been known for his kindheartedness?


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: boonies4u on July 23, 2012, 12:05:14 AM
If he is having actual profits, from either trading, or running a business... legal or otherwise. I think that the people with relatively deeper pockets are his clients, and not lenders.

If he was going to scam anyone, it would be them. But, it sounds like they aren't holding an account with them.

If his business is illegal, that means that if he is caught, the lenders could get in trouble, as well as the possibility of the funds being tied up.

If Pirate is infact running a shady operation, I would advise him to get a dead man's switch of some sort that would force withdraw all accounts to whatever % possible.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Frankie on July 23, 2012, 02:06:56 AM
When BTCST ends, he should just propose his new business project to his lenders and I'm pretty sure a good majority of them will still invest in Pirate project. Those who don't will be free to withdraw, and that's it. Pirate will be able to raise thousand of Bitcoins for a new venture without any efforts compared to the rest of us.

Old business model:

1. ...?
2. Profit!

New business model:

1. ...? (but different!)
2. Profit!


But you are right about what a great deal he has. I mean what young savvy entrepreneur--who has supposedly generated hundreds of thousands in profits for himself--could ever pass up the opportunity a raising funds for the low, low rate of, um, 3000% interest?

Stop drinking the Kool-aid, Brunic. I think it might not be good for your health.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: boonies4u on July 23, 2012, 03:02:47 AM
When BTCST ends, he should just propose his new business project to his lenders and I'm pretty sure a good majority of them will still invest in Pirate project. Those who don't will be free to withdraw, and that's it. Pirate will be able to raise thousand of Bitcoins for a new venture without any efforts compared to the rest of us.

Old business model:

1. ...?
2. Profit!

New business model:

1. ...? (but different!)
2. Profit!


But you are right about what a great deal he has. I mean what young savvy entrepreneur--who has supposedly generated hundreds of thousands in profits for himself--could ever pass up the opportunity a raising funds for the low, low rate of, um, 3000% interest?

Stop drinking the Kool-aid, Brunic. I think it might not be good for your health.

If it's a scam, he's going to run for the hills, if it's not a scam, I doubt he is going anywhere, unless it involves legal repercussion.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Peter Todd on July 23, 2012, 05:49:16 AM
Lets suppose the speculation is ....
tl;dr - The Pirate has a big incentive to destroy Bitcoin itself.

Please move this to speculation !

Destroy btc ? If pirate is making money one way or the other playing with bitcoin, Why would he kill it all ?
He's already invested into GPUMAX afaik, wouldn't he be sell it before ? ... Well whatever, I don't even know why people responded to this OP.
 ... a few more ignore on my list.

Who's to say GPUMAX is proving to be profitable? They're obviously trying to limit growth with the huge waitlist. The very concept of it - a quick way to buy hashing power with bitcoins - provides an end-run around the security model of bitcoin; useful for double-spend attacks for instance. The concessions by making it only possible to redirect GPUMAX hashing power to major pools are probably grudgingly provided, and would serve to severely limit the value of the service. For all we know GPUMAX is being subsidized right now so that the capability is in reserve.

Anyway, fundamentally the pirate is accumulating *bitcoins* one way or another by playing with bitcoin. He needs a way to lock-in those profits without legal risks to himself, either by staying totally anonymous, "getting away with it" legally speaking, or by someone actually developing those profits. My scenario provides an possible way to actually generate those profits, unique to a small market like bitcoin that actually does have the potential to be destroyed. If he manages to pull it off, it'd get rid of a lot of legal risk if someone manages to somehow unmask him.

When you get down to it, the Pirate is probably the guy with the biggest bitcoin-denominated debt, by far. A debt that could well be a good chunk of the bitcoin economy - observe the ludicrous recent forum post titled "Bitcoin Killer App: High Yield Investments". If a good chunk of the bitcoin economy may be these naive investors plowing money into scams, and when that bubble bursts the outcome will be ugly enough as it is.

Unfortunately with their bitcoin-denominated debts the people running these scams have an incentive to make sure that outcome is as ugly as possible.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Frankie on July 23, 2012, 02:10:10 PM
Oh, I see what you're saying.  He would have an incentive to sell enough coins to drive the value to almost zero by collapsing confidence in bitcoin permanently, such that he could walk away with the cash while still paying people back their worthless bitcoins.

That's an interesting idea, but it seems like a longshot to actually succeed.  You'd have to drive bitcoins really close to $0 for it to work, and they would have to stay at that value even as he buys several more times of bitcoins back to cover the loans.

This scheme is much more difficult to pull off than simply taking the money and running. I think you underestimate the probability of him getting away with it.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: molecular on July 23, 2012, 02:17:01 PM
Lets suppose the speculation is true, and the Pirate has in fact been selling large amounts of coin. Ostensibly this is to stop bubbles, but another possibility is he's gradually converting a large amount of his bitcoin holdings into fiat. One he's done that he then has the incentive to crash the bitcoin market as his Bitcoin Savings and Trust obligations are denominated in Bitcoins. For instance, suppose he's a FinCEN insider and known's that repressive anti-bitcoin measures are about to be introduced. After the crash he simply has to buy back the coins at much-reduced rates, and he gets to keep the fiat left over as his profits.

tl;dr - The Pirate has a big incentive to destroy Bitcoin itself.

He's selling borrowed BTC (while paying interest) on the market with the goal of buying them back lower. That's called 'shorting bitcoin', no?


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: crazy_rabbit on July 23, 2012, 02:59:08 PM
color me queasy.

 :(


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: elux on July 23, 2012, 03:15:12 PM
Oh, I see what you're saying.  He would have an incentive to sell enough coins to drive the value to almost zero by collapsing confidence in bitcoin permanently, such that he could walk away with the cash while still paying people back their worthless bitcoins.

That's an interesting idea, but it seems like a longshot to actually succeed.  You'd have to drive bitcoins really close to $0 for it to work, and they would have to stay at that value even as he buys several more times of bitcoins back to cover the loans.

This scheme is much more difficult to pull off than simply taking the money and running. I think you underestimate the probability of him getting away with it.

Something like this is certainly possible, if you're rich enough in BTC,
compared to the "real" depth of the orderbook down to your target price.

You don't need to drive the price to zero, or make it stay there for the scheme to work.


Extremely simplified hypothetical scenario with completely fictional numbers:

Assume that for some strange reason find yourself in possession of 500K BTC, 0 USD.
Assume that it takes 500K BTC to - however briefly - drive the price to 1 USD.

Step 1: You sell 500K BTC from 10 USD down to 1 USD/BTC.
Let's assume you manage to get an average price 5 USD/BTC, this nets you 2.5M USD,

Step 2: Immediately place a bid for 2.5M BTC at 1 USD/BTC.
Price rebounds from 1USD/BTC. You now possess 2.5 Million BTC, 0 USD.

Step 3: (Optional) Pay off Bitcoin denominated debt, if any.


And... you're done! Buy an island and retire. 8)



Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Peter Todd on July 23, 2012, 03:59:26 PM
Oh, I see what you're saying.  He would have an incentive to sell enough coins to drive the value to almost zero by collapsing confidence in bitcoin permanently, such that he could walk away with the cash while still paying people back their worthless bitcoins.

That's an interesting idea, but it seems like a longshot to actually succeed.  You'd have to drive bitcoins really close to $0 for it to work, and they would have to stay at that value even as he buys several more times of bitcoins back to cover the loans.

This scheme is much more difficult to pull off than simply taking the money and running. I think you underestimate the probability of him getting away with it.

Exactly. Also don't forget that from the bitcoin communities point of view even if he doesn't succeed, the fact that he has the incentive to try is dangerous in of itself. He might think the plan is much more probable to succeed than we do. For instance going back to my hypothetical FinCEN insider example, it'd create dangerous incentives for such an insider to push hard to strict bitcoin regulation regardless of merit, and such an insider is likely to have a lot of faith in the power of market regulation.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: MrTeal on July 23, 2012, 03:59:57 PM
What happens in step 2 if the market doesn't fill your bid for 2.5M BTC @ USD$1, and bids at $5 start flooding the market? Finding people to sell you a huge number of BTC @ $1 might be difficult.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Peter Todd on July 23, 2012, 04:05:46 PM
What happens in step 2 if the market doesn't fill your bid for 2.5M BTC @ USD$1, and bids at $5 start flooding the market? Finding people to sell you a huge number of BTC @ $1 might be difficult.

I suspect that simple order dumping isn't enough. The most likely way for this plan to work would be if bitcoin was made illegal in a large market, like the states, with heavy enforcement threatened. (ideally with some high profile "we know you have bitcoins and will throw you in jail if you don't get rid of them" busts) The trick would be for the authorities to say that bitcoin is currently legal, (or at least will be tolerated) and will be made illegal sometime in the near future, thus encouraging large numbers of people to dump their bitcoins on the market. This would provide the Pirate the supply required to actually buy back all the coins he owes. It'd also look good from a PR point of view, allowing all those innocent investors a chance to get out of it without legal repercussions.

It'd work best if bitcoin is made illegal somewhere other than Japan, so that mtgox would continue to function during the sell-off.

Of course, even just making sure that in the future it will be very difficult to do anything with bitcoins is probably enough of a shock to make prices drop by a lot as it is. Saying you'll shutdown the major exchanges by a certain date would go a long way to achieving that kind of shock. It'd look like the moon cake receipt market as the holiday approaches.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: elux on July 23, 2012, 04:10:26 PM
What happens in step 2 if the market doesn't fill your bid for 2.5M BTC @ USD$1, and bids at $5 start flooding the market? Finding people to sell you a huge number of BTC @ $1 might be difficult.

Well, you fail.

You need to finish selling the open orders of BTC down to your target price,
before the market react and successfully transfer the millions of dollars required to stop the fall into the exchange(s).

Surprise and confusion would be an advantage.

If taken by surprise, much of the market will obviously, reasonably join in and sell what they can while the price is "still above 8$, still above $7, still above $6, still above 5$".

This gives an advantage to the instigator of the crash, as he will (plausibly) get a higher average price for his sold coins, than if he were to do it alone.

Also: You can still succeed, even if the sudden drops stops at 2.0$ or whatever... As long as you sell most at the top and less at the end.




Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Spekulatius on July 23, 2012, 04:44:29 PM
What happens in step 2 if the market doesn't fill your bid for 2.5M BTC @ USD$1, and bids at $5 start flooding the market? Finding people to sell you a huge number of BTC @ $1 might be difficult.

Well, you fail.

You need to finish selling the open orders of BTC down to your target price,
before the market react and successfully transfer the millions of dollars required to stop the fall into the exchange(s).

You can dump as much as you want in an instant, sell 500k BTC right now: MtGox freezes the orderbook, processes all trades till your sell is fully processed and then reopens order receival. Thats to say, no need to wait for anyone. Also, the depth you see in the orderbook is only the active funds, that want to be traded. There are much more sitting in the accounts already, waiting to be placed.

Quote
Surprise and confusion would be an advantage.

If taken by surprise, much of the market will obviously, reasonably join in and sell what they can while the price is "still above 8$, still above $7, still above $6, still above 5$".

This gives an advantage to the instigator of the crash, as he will (plausibly) get a higher average price for his sold coins, than if he were to do it alone.

Sry, thats wrong. The opposite would happen.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: Spekulatius on July 23, 2012, 05:07:33 PM
I think one important aspect has been missed in this thread:

Will he leave with BTC or USD in his pockets??

Option A:

He's running a legitimate business. In this case, when he decides to quit, the first thing he has to do (in order to stay within legal boundaries) is to make sure to have enough BTC funds to pay back his lenders. He may have to buy on the market large amounts to fill potential voids. He then has to announce the end of operations of BS&T (does anybody know what notice period he has to adhere to?). Once all debts are paid off, he can either keep all his remaining BTC, USD or convert one into the other and walk away. We may see a substancial purchase of BTC in advance to his notice, which would be an indicator of his true blue intentions.

Option B:

He's running a ponzi or legitimate business but decides to scam everybody. In that case he will not give prior notice, try to vanish as quickly as possible, preferably before the whole swindle surfaces so he can pocket all the funds without paying anything back. The question now arises: Will he leave with BTC or with USD in his pockets?

1. If he is indeed running a ponzi scheme, the mayor part of his funds will be held in BTC through the influx of BTC from his lenders. To leave the country (because his identity is know) with only a huge amount of bitcoin in his wallet, that still has to go through some bank account to convert into USD is a rather flawed option (lets put any of the BTC for USD in mail services aside, because none of those would have sufficent USD cash reserves to pay out 250k BTC in mail envelopes). He would probably try to convert a significant amount of his BTC denominated funds to USD and withdraw that prior to his exit. The current MtGox withdrawal limits (https://support.mtgox.com/home) are limited to a maximum of 500k USD/month for trusted customers. He would have to give it at least 2 month time to prepare his exit to withdraw 1M USD and maybe some extra from other exchanges to have a reasonable pocket money for his livelong vacation on tropical island. We could in that regard see some 1M USD worth in BTC be sold on the major exchanges (and withdrawn).

2. If he is instead selling large amounts of BTC to an anonymous investor that uses pirate as surrogate, he could decide to pocket the USD from his big brother and default on his BTC debts, duping all his lenders as he walks away with about 2M USD in his pocket. That way the community would have no prior warning and no chance to trace pirate after he vanishes, except for international warrants (likely?). The BTC lent, will be still there, but through various laundering services probably well cleaned off their tracks.

So in conclusion; depending on the scheme he is running, one can only hope, that he is a good pirate at heart, because in both cases he could just sail away with all the money and leave nothing behind. But honestly, what pirate has ever been known for his kindheartedness?

I reason that, given he is exiting through Option B, will sell rather slowly his vast amounts of BTC over the major exchanges. Maybe take 1 or 2 month, before he finally pulls the plug. This way his returns are much (4-6 times) higher as if he would just frantically crash the market by selling all his BTC at once and drawing all possible attention to him that way. I dont know how his mind works, but I pressume he is a rather clever fella and prefers a good result over a big BANG (but then again. he's a pirate after all, right?).

With Option A he would have to announce his closure within notice period, so we would at least see that indicator coming. A market crash thereafter makes no sense (except for the delightful panic to watch)



Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: gadsdengraphics on August 03, 2012, 03:23:01 PM
I think one important aspect has been missed in this thread:

Will he leave with BTC or USD in his pockets??

Option A:

He's running a legitimate business. In this case, when he decides to quit, the first thing he has to do (in order to stay within legal boundaries) is to make sure to have enough BTC funds to pay back his lenders. He may have to buy on the market large amounts to fill potential voids. He then has to announce the end of operations of BS&T (does anybody know what notice period he has to adhere to?). Once all debts are paid off, he can either keep all his remaining BTC, USD or convert one into the other and walk away. We may see a substancial purchase of BTC in advance to his notice, which would be an indicator of his true blue intentions.

Option B:

He's running a ponzi or legitimate business but decides to scam everybody. In that case he will not give prior notice, try to vanish as quickly as possible, preferably before the whole swindle surfaces so he can pocket all the funds without paying anything back. The question now arises: Will he leave with BTC or with USD in his pockets?

1. If he is indeed running a ponzi scheme, the mayor part of his funds will be held in BTC through the influx of BTC from his lenders. To leave the country (because his identity is know) with only a huge amount of bitcoin in his wallet, that still has to go through some bank account to convert into USD is a rather flawed option (lets put any of the BTC for USD in mail services aside, because none of those would have sufficent USD cash reserves to pay out 250k BTC in mail envelopes). He would probably try to convert a significant amount of his BTC denominated funds to USD and withdraw that prior to his exit. The current MtGox withdrawal limits (https://support.mtgox.com/home) are limited to a maximum of 500k USD/month for trusted customers. He would have to give it at least 2 month time to prepare his exit to withdraw 1M USD and maybe some extra from other exchanges to have a reasonable pocket money for his livelong vacation on tropical island. We could in that regard see some 1M USD worth in BTC be sold on the major exchanges (and withdrawn).

2. If he is instead selling large amounts of BTC to an anonymous investor that uses pirate as surrogate, he could decide to pocket the USD from his big brother and default on his BTC debts, duping all his lenders as he walks away with about 2M USD in his pocket. That way the community would have no prior warning and no chance to trace pirate after he vanishes, except for international warrants (likely?). The BTC lent, will be still there, but through various laundering services probably well cleaned off their tracks.

So in conclusion; depending on the scheme he is running, one can only hope, that he is a good pirate at heart, because in both cases he could just sail away with all the money and leave nothing behind. But honestly, what pirate has ever been known for his kindheartedness?

I reason that, given he is exiting through Option B, will sell rather slowly his vast amounts of BTC over the major exchanges. Maybe take 1 or 2 month, before he finally pulls the plug. This way his returns are much (4-6 times) higher as if he would just frantically crash the market by selling all his BTC at once and drawing all possible attention to him that way. I dont know how his mind works, but I pressume he is a rather clever fella and prefers a good result over a big BANG (but then again. he's a pirate after all, right?).

With Option A he would have to announce his closure within notice period, so we would at least see that indicator coming. A market crash thereafter makes no sense (except for the delightful panic to watch)


You seem to be assuming that the trades to liquidate BTC to USD would be on MtGox or another market. Why couldn't it be in #bitcoin-otc?

If I were wanting to cash out 250k BTC, I'd reach out to some of the high rollers in there. Arrange a meet in person, and walk away with FRNs or gold bullion.

Surely there are people out there that would be perfectly willing to accept "tainted" BTC at a discounted rate.

If I were Pirate, and I was running a Ponzi scheme (which I'm not saying is the case), I'd have my exit plan already in place. Build up the operating market until an agreed-upon point, then cash out through a contracted deal and walk away.

Why would he care if he gets $7.50 or even $4.00 for each BTC? They aren't his in the first place, and it would be wise to trade potential unrealized gains for a secure exit strategy.


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: byronbb on August 03, 2012, 04:17:25 PM
<tinfoilhat>Pirate has a bitcoin exploit that will devalue the coins to zero, never to return.</tinfoilhat>


Title: Re: A Bitcoin Savings and Trust exit plan, incentivizing the destruction of Bitcoin
Post by: BitBuster on August 03, 2012, 06:39:35 PM
This is all bullshit. Yes he can crash the value and take it out of the system. But that won't stop people using bitcoin or its value increasing again. Remember the Mt.Gox hack?


BB.