|
Title: delete Post by: BitcoinEXpress on July 23, 2012, 06:27:40 AM delete
Title: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on July 23, 2012, 06:29:38 PM I LAWLed after I read the following:
"If I was a programmer, I'd be glad to code, knowing that only the fact that Microcash is released will drive the price ten times higher. Maybe some of us who told earlier that he has a job and no time, will do it for 40 000 CS, for example? And remember, that BTC is near 9 dollars now. Let's imagine, that MC, when released, is worth 0.007 BTC again, and btc = 8 dollars 40 000 x 0.007 = 280 btc 280 x 8 = 2240 dollars You only need to be a SC/MC enthusiast. And Microcash is very promising, have great design, features. What if it will rise to 0.07 very soon? Namecoin once was. Does anybody want 22 400 dollars, just risk and wait a little? And this is not usual pyramid scam what I'm saying now, this is very possible. I didn't say 0,7 or 'dollar', 0.07 is very likely to be soon after release." Title: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on July 23, 2012, 06:30:55 PM Wow they had more than 5 post in a single day over there! Seems reality is setting in. RS has abandoned the project. http://forums.microcash.org/index.php/topic/593-microcash-announcement/page__view__findpost__p__6615 ~BCX~ BCX I wouldn't be surprised if the Soiledcoin folk and RS himself are mining litecoins. It's pretty good profit when compared to mining bitcoin ...at the moment. "Microcash will be released on May 10th"...........LOL Title: Re: delete Post by: Vod on July 23, 2012, 06:42:20 PM RS has abandoned the project. I couldn't find that on the link you provided... Title: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on July 23, 2012, 07:05:47 PM RS has abandoned the project. I couldn't find that on the link you provided... His silence I believe speaks volumes... Title: Re: delete Post by: Vod on July 23, 2012, 10:33:41 PM RS has abandoned the project. I couldn't find that on the link you provided... Here it is http://forums.microcash.org/index.php/topic/593-microcash-announcement/page__view__findpost__p__6618 That doesn't state anything about RS abandoning the project, or members admitting the project is dead. You love those sensational thread titles eh? :) All I see is a comment from an idiot Quote I guess we all have to wait a little longer and stand strong while being tested. Does he think RS is some sort of god that is testing him? ughTitle: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on July 23, 2012, 10:35:50 PM RS has abandoned the project. I couldn't find that on the link you provided... Here it is http://forums.microcash.org/index.php/topic/593-microcash-announcement/page__view__findpost__p__6618 That doesn't state anything about RS abandoning the project, or members admitting the project is dead. You love those sensational thread titles eh? :) All I see is a comment from an idiot Quote I guess we all have to wait a little longer and stand strong while being tested. Does he think RS is some sort of god that is testing him? ughYes. Title: Re: delete Post by: k9quaint on July 23, 2012, 11:08:09 PM RS has abandoned the project. I couldn't find that on the link you provided... Here it is http://forums.microcash.org/index.php/topic/593-microcash-announcement/page__view__findpost__p__6618 That doesn't state anything about RS abandoning the project, or members admitting the project is dead. You love those sensational thread titles eh? :) All I see is a comment from an idiot Quote I guess we all have to wait a little longer and stand strong while being tested. Does he think RS is some sort of god that is testing him? ughOne only needs to find SoiledCoin lonely by the side of the road to posit that it has been abandoned. You do not need a statement from Realsolid declaring that he has stopped work. He may have gone stealth mode, but this is unlikely given that he was an attention hound for months on both forums. A more precise statement would be: "It appears that RealSolid has abandoned SoiledCoin. Members caught admitting SoiledCoin is dead in the water." Title: Re: delete Post by: Bitcoin Oz on July 23, 2012, 11:13:44 PM "[#2000] You are not allowed to visit this community. " :)
Title: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on July 24, 2012, 12:40:24 AM The allowed me to post over on Solidcoin Forum, Realsolid must be dead. http://forums.microcash.org/index.php/topic/593-microcash-announcement/page__view__findpost__p__6624 Quote @Coinhinter, RealSolid and/or Notyep (if you're still existing as three distinct voices in your head) What's the current update on MicroCash? I'm almost ready to beta test my new Solidcoin Exchange called BCEXchange. Not because I like of any of you or think Solidcoin or Microcash for that matter has any future, but to simply enjoy the fact the only place you have to trade Solidcoin into real money will be through me. In addition I've mined a shitload of Solidcoin over the past months as well scooped a huge amount in off exchange buys. I plan on running it fair and not ripping anyone off but I do plan on unloading a lot of Solidcoin via my own exchange as well giving you guys a place to trade. How's that for straight up honesty? So hopefully you haven't started back on your meds and silenced those demons we all love over at Bitcointalk so love. :D :D :D ~BCX~ +1 Nice... Title: Re: delete Post by: jwzguy on July 24, 2012, 01:02:00 AM Didn't BTC-e drop SC because no one was trading it? So if there's 0 demand why bother starting another exchange?
Title: Re: delete Post by: Bitcoin Oz on July 24, 2012, 01:07:50 AM Didn't BTC-e drop SC because no one was trading it? So if there's 0 demand why bother starting another exchange? Does trolling count ? Title: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on July 24, 2012, 01:36:55 AM Didn't BTC-e drop SC because no one was trading it? So if there's 0 demand why bother starting another exchange? Lulz is just as important in terms of demand as profit. ;D Title: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on July 24, 2012, 04:04:58 AM Didn't BTC-e drop SC because no one was trading it? So if there's 0 demand why bother starting another exchange? Because if enough people buy SC I'll 51% LTC after DDoS finishes off the pools. ~BCX~ Wow this is the first time I disagree with you BCX. Why not just 51% LTC now? Title: Re: delete Post by: SuperTramp on July 24, 2012, 04:36:05 AM Didn't BTC-e drop SC because no one was trading it? So if there's 0 demand why bother starting another exchange? Because if enough people buy SC I'll 51% LTC after DDoS finishes off the pools. ~BCX~ Why attack/51% ltc? Title: Re: delete Post by: SuperTramp on July 24, 2012, 04:54:29 AM " I was cool with that till a couple of the LTC people for no reason decided to jump all over me in BTC-E the other day and told me to take my best shot. How's pool mining been?" Personally dont do much mining these days and have very very little to do with LTC. Just put a 5830 running reaper on ltc today for a few hours, just curious to see what it would do in terms of production/btc/profit. I have it mining at Coinotron and seems to be fine, but honestly have never mined ltc enough to tell whether it is good or not. Looks like about/around 2.2LTC/1hr with a 5830, not sure its worth it really. I was just curious as to what made you decide to attack/51% the chain. Title: Re: delete Post by: HauntingShade on July 24, 2012, 05:41:04 AM Not right now, I'm DDoS strength testing Bitcoin.Me. Hey NoAgenda, check you server logs 04:10:00 GMT for bandwidth, that was only 300 bots... I could make it 2000 if you like and run it for a couple of weeks instead of 10 minutes if you like? ~BCX~ Mister Toughguy. Well done. You're only actually pissing people off right now, nothing more. :-\ Please leave Pooler alone, or is this something personal? :o Title: Re: delete Post by: SuperDuperJenkins on July 24, 2012, 06:28:41 AM Title: Re: delete Post by: SuperDuperJenkins on July 24, 2012, 06:39:35 AM Mundo asked why you haven't reported BTC-e.com for fraud?
Title: Re: delete Post by: SuperDuperJenkins on July 24, 2012, 06:40:27 AM Mundo want police to fuck BTC-e.com Russians up! ;)
Title: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on July 24, 2012, 06:55:04 AM Didn't BTC-e drop SC because no one was trading it? So if there's 0 demand why bother starting another exchange? Because if enough people buy SC I'll 51% LTC after DDoS finishes off the pools. ~BCX~ Why attack/51% ltc? Well quite a few have pointed I have successfully 51% attacked TBX, exterminated FBX, hit Geistgeld twice, and terrorized Namecoin before it merged, 51% attacked IXC and IOC more times than I count and successfully DS attacked Bitparking.....and never once bothered LTC. I was cool with that till a couple of the LTC people for no reason decided to jump all over me in BTC-E the other day and told me to take my best shot. How's pool mining been? ~BCX~ I still think if you're cool with me and Coblee you wouldn't attack LTC. I dont think many of us would have a problem if it were a planned attack to test LTC but not to break it or to kill confidence in it. |
