Bitcoin Forum

Other => Meta => Topic started by: VodPonzis Lawyer on February 12, 2015, 02:52:57 AM



Title: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: VodPonzis Lawyer on February 12, 2015, 02:52:57 AM
http://s4.postimg.org/oamcxq3a5/reallawyer.png


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: BadBear on February 12, 2015, 02:56:49 AM
lol


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: criptix on February 12, 2015, 02:57:01 AM
8/10  :D


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Superhitech on February 12, 2015, 02:59:54 AM
LOL! These guys are scammers, but funny.  :D Thanks for the laugh.

If anyone wants to see the original VodPonzi thread for more laughs, check this thread out. cache:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=935519.0


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: VodPonzis Lawyer on February 12, 2015, 03:15:46 AM
LOL! These guys are scammers, but funny.  :D Thanks for the laugh.

If anyone wants to see the original VodPonzi thread for more laughs, check this thread out. cache:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=935519.0

The original vodponzi thread has been archived here for future reference:

https://archive.today/55m3Y


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 12, 2015, 03:22:02 AM
I wanted to be a victim in this legitimate illegal ponzi scheme >:( Or at least a sockpuppet *kicks at nothing*


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Quickseller on February 12, 2015, 03:26:36 AM
How much did it cost you to make that vanity address?

I am glad to see that people are still trolling Vod, over a month after he left - this must mean that he did a good job at stopping scammer


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: CanaryInTheMine on February 12, 2015, 03:30:00 AM
Do I get a referral fee for suggesting you take action on WoodCollector's behalf?
Scammers....


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 12, 2015, 03:32:42 AM
Do I get a referral fee for suggesting you take action on WoodCollector's behalf?
Scammers....

https://i.imgflip.com/hj6oq.jpg (https://imgflip.com/i/hj6oq)via Imgflip Meme Maker (https://imgflip.com/memegenerator)


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Xian01 on February 12, 2015, 03:34:10 AM
How much did it cost you to make that vanity address?
Vanity addresses that short are fairly easy to generate on your own.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: comExtern on February 12, 2015, 03:42:09 AM
lolz. can I join and get reimburZed?  ;D


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: igl00 on February 12, 2015, 03:47:50 AM
very nice, looks just like twitter.com/equalpumps scammers idea


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: JorgeStolfi on February 12, 2015, 03:50:23 AM
Isn't a contract void before the law, if it specifies illegal activities? 


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: thriftshopping on February 12, 2015, 03:51:01 AM
There is not even a Tom Williams that practices law in CA, nor is your address actually associated with any law practice! What kind of scam are you trying to pull?


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: VodPonzis Lawyer on February 12, 2015, 03:53:12 AM
There is not even a Tom Williams that practices law in CA, nor is your address actually associated with any law practice! What kind of scam are you trying to pull?

We are a deepweb lawfirm. If you sha1sum that address and base32 encode the first half of the digest, it will take you to our Tor hidden service. This is the underground way of posting onion urls.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: JorgeStolfi on February 12, 2015, 03:54:14 AM
There is not even a Tom Williams that practices law in CA, nor is your address actually associated with any law practice! What kind of scam are you trying to pull?

And of course it is not the lawyer who COMMANDS with a plain letter, it is the Judge, through a court order.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: thriftshopping on February 12, 2015, 03:58:34 AM
There is not even a Tom Williams that practices law in CA, nor is your address actually associated with any law practice! What kind of scam are you trying to pull?

We are a deepweb lawfirm.
LOL. I think publicly stating your 'address' defeats the purpose of practicing law in the "deep web". I would like to see proof that you are licensed to do business in the state of CA, or any state for that matter.


If you sha256sum that address and base58 encode it, it will take you to our Tor hidden service.
I would actually not be 100% surprised if this actually lead back to something.

There is not even a Tom Williams that practices law in CA, nor is your address actually associated with any law practice! What kind of scam are you trying to pull?

And of course it is not the lawyer who COMMANDS with a plain letter, it is the Judge, through a court order.
There is also a case number but no venue. These kinds of things generally require service, but I don't think posting in meta would qualify.....the list goes on but this guy should continue trolling


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: JorgeStolfi on February 12, 2015, 04:00:24 AM
There is not even a Tom Williams that practices law in CA, nor is your address actually associated with any law practice! What kind of scam are you trying to pull?

They spelled their name wrong on the letterhead.  It happens.  Try "Robin Williams" (formerly "Mork & Mindy Attorneys LLP")


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: VodPonzis Lawyer on February 12, 2015, 04:13:07 AM
Does anyone else think that the average level of intelligence of posters on bitcointalk has gone into the shitter?


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: thriftshopping on February 12, 2015, 04:15:09 AM
Does anyone else think that the average level of intelligence of posters on bitcointalk has gone into the shitter?
I think the median level of intelligence has been horrible for a long time now. The average however is still quite very high IMO.

I wonder how many times prior to this you have attempted to troll Vod

edit: maybe you are Vod, just having a little bit of fun on the time you aren't spending studying ;)


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Somekindabitcoin on February 12, 2015, 04:15:33 AM
Does anyone else think that the average level of intelligence of posters on bitcointalk has gone into the shitter?

Your posts have went to -9001


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: bitparadise on February 12, 2015, 04:17:32 AM
Who is Nick Szabo? He is this the real satoshi?


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: thriftshopping on February 12, 2015, 04:19:27 AM
Who is Nick Szabo? He is this the real satoshi?
He is rumored to be satoshi, but is probably not

edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Szabo


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Quickseller on February 12, 2015, 04:43:33 AM
Personal text from the OP: [admin note:] confirmed real lawyer


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: VodPonzis Lawyer on February 12, 2015, 04:56:35 AM
Personal text from the OP: [admin note:] confirmed real lawyer

I apologize. That was a typo, it has been rectified.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Somekindabitcoin on February 12, 2015, 05:01:08 AM
Who makes a Martin Lawrence Investments LLC?

Gotta be someone who really hates Vod.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: VodPonzis Lawyer on February 12, 2015, 05:02:35 AM
Who makes a Martin Lawrence Investments LLC?

Gotta be someone who really hates Vod.

Or someone who really loves Vod. Vod is love, Vod is life. Vod is everything.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Somekindabitcoin on February 12, 2015, 05:03:59 AM
Pretty obvious Vod never made a ponzi though. He's already rich in Bitcoin anyways.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: redsn0w on February 12, 2015, 05:47:51 AM
This is a new level of Ponzi schemes, awesome! The idea of a payments to a vanity address is fantastic http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/nonciclopedia/images/1/13/Asd.gif/revision/latest?cb=20071018154810.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: thriftshopping on February 12, 2015, 05:49:55 AM
This is a new level of Ponzi schemes, awesome! The idea of a payments to a vanity address is fantastic http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/nonciclopedia/images/1/13/Asd.gif/revision/latest?cb=20071018154810.
For some reason I doubt you have read the thread. The OP is asking theymos to pay a crazy sum because the OP's account was banned.

The OP previously started a ponzi called Vod Ponzi that was dealing in bitcointalk accounts


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: redsn0w on February 12, 2015, 06:01:48 AM
This is a new level of Ponzi schemes, awesome! The idea of a payments to a vanity address is fantastic http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/nonciclopedia/images/1/13/Asd.gif/revision/latest?cb=20071018154810.
For some reason I doubt you have read the thread. The OP is asking theymos to pay a crazy sum because the OP's account was banned.

The OP previously started a ponzi called Vod Ponzi that was dealing in bitcointalk accounts

No no I know the story , my (it) was only a sarcasm.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: smoothie on February 12, 2015, 06:59:51 PM
this is too funny.

Bitcointalk has free entertainment and in large quantities.  :D :D :D


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: tss on February 13, 2015, 01:23:22 AM
classic.  got a good laugh on this one.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Blazed on February 13, 2015, 04:27:10 AM
https://blockchain.info/tx/f68fe9871fcde5b1ac7c695ad8c1dcb4744468fbcd80b8f978bbc58fbccbba94

Well played...thanks for the lol.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Quickseller on February 13, 2015, 04:31:01 AM
https://blockchain.info/tx/f68fe9871fcde5b1ac7c695ad8c1dcb4744468fbcd80b8f978bbc58fbccbba94

Well played...thanks for the lol.
lol. That made my day seeing that.

It would have been hilarious if you had used inputs totaling ~27.5 BTC


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Muhammed Zakir on February 13, 2015, 07:02:11 AM
OMG! Did he just found out who's Satoshi? :o You really deserve more than 27.482971BTC. :D

   -MZ


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Lauda on February 13, 2015, 01:07:42 PM
Sue me too please. I want to be famous.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: HeroC on February 16, 2015, 04:18:21 PM
Wow, this is awful. Nothing but plain stupidity.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Gleb Gamow on February 17, 2015, 08:57:20 AM
Does anyone else think that the average level of intelligence of posters on bitcointalk has gone into the shitter?

You're not goin' to believe this, but I'm literally currently takin' a shit while pennin' this reply. When I'm done, I should be a few IQ points lighter. Rish me ruck!

BTW, I figured that the OP was up to something upon first reading "Tom Williams". But, if I was mistaken, a Google-fuuin' I'd've (how the fuck is that pronounced?) gone.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: peligro on February 17, 2015, 09:32:50 AM
One of the better attempts on scamming here. At least some effort was put in, much better than signing up and asking for loan with some sad story.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: NeuroticFish on February 17, 2015, 09:39:12 AM
It was fun to read.
It's so blatantly fake that's .. oh, so, so, funny!


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Havelivi on February 17, 2015, 12:29:35 PM
funniest thread of the week, that make me ROFL ;D ;D


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Mist on February 17, 2015, 02:46:10 PM
This is hilarious, please post more, you are great!


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: amiryaqot on February 17, 2015, 05:07:56 PM
that is awesome, when you are going to post more funny stuff like this ;D


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: ajareselde on February 27, 2015, 12:40:08 AM
VodPonzi website is now live: http://vodponzi.co.nr

there is a place for that, and its not here in meta, rather in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=207.0
didnt you see the new section  ::)

cheers


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: galdur on February 27, 2015, 12:49:51 AM
There is not even a Tom Williams that practices law in CA, nor is your address actually associated with any law practice! What kind of scam are you trying to pull?

200,000 lawyers in CA and not one named Thomas Williams ? That I find hard to believe.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: ajareselde on February 27, 2015, 02:17:18 AM
There is not even a Tom Williams that practices law in CA, nor is your address actually associated with any law practice! What kind of scam are you trying to pull?

200,000 lawyers in CA and not one named Thomas Williams ? That I find hard to believe.

lol its obviously a troll, or you think a registered lawyer would name himself as vodponzis lawyer, and launch a ponzi schemed  site ?
if he had a signature and stamp on that troll post, he might get into pretty nice trouble depending where he lives.

example "Man Charged with Impersonating an Attorney in Fraudulent Scheme "
http://www.fbi.gov/sanfrancisco/press-releases/2010/sf040210.htm

cheers


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: VodPonzis Lawyer on February 27, 2015, 08:17:17 AM
"Man Charged with Impersonating an Attorney in Fraudulent Scheme "
http://www.fbi.gov/sanfrancisco/press-releases/2010/sf040210.htm

Don't worry, the forum rules say that ponzi's are allowed, all is ok and stuff.


Title: Re: Martin Lawrence Investments LLC vs bitcointalk.org., Case No.B7158590126-2
Post by: Posseptiche on February 27, 2015, 11:15:37 AM
Man these guys are funny! make more funny posts. What is the background music on the website?