Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Service Discussion => Topic started by: genjix on July 26, 2012, 02:09:06 PM



Title: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: genjix on July 26, 2012, 02:09:06 PM
We don't have all the information, and I'd avoid leaping to conclusions until you know more. Personally I'm staying out of this as I'm not qualified to make judgements and adequate people are already involved.

Here's an extract from an article (http://bitcoinmedia.com/the-future-cannot-exist-without-the-past/) I wrote:

Quote
In 1992, Stella Liebeck bought coffee at McDonalds. She spilled the hot drink on herself and later claiming injury against McDonalds because the coffee was too hot, initiated a lawsuit for $1 million. She is the poster child for frivolous litigation in the US.

What I failed to mention is that the coffee was served at over 90 degrees celsius and having suffered 3rd degree burns over 16% of her body, she spent 8 days in hospital for skin grafting and required 2 years of medical treatment. When she asked McDonalds to pay $20k to cover the remaining medical expenses which her insurance wouldn’t cover, they rebuked her with an offer of $800. During the case she offered to settle out of court with them for $20k and later $300k which they refused both times. During the case it was found there were 700 other similar court cases where McDonalds had settled out of court.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: davout on July 26, 2012, 02:10:04 PM
So ?


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: DarkEmi on July 26, 2012, 02:32:05 PM
Arent you qualified to contact authorities, police, attorney, on the behalf of bitcoinica ?


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: repentance on July 26, 2012, 02:53:34 PM
We don't have all the information, and I'd avoid leaping to conclusions until you know more. Personally I'm staying out of this as I'm not qualified to make judgements and adequate people are already involved.

No informal investigation can ever uncover all the information.  If no formal investigation takes place, then - for better or worse - this whole affair is going to be judged on limited facts in the court of public opinion.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: defxor on July 26, 2012, 02:56:33 PM
We don't have all the information, and I'd avoid leaping to conclusions until you know more. Personally I'm staying out of this as I'm not qualified to make judgements and adequate people are already involved.

The strongest indication that one or more of the Bitcoinica hacks were inside jobs is that you, Patrick and/or Donald have not filed a police report.

Currently I consider the only unknown to be exactly who were in on it. Feel free to let us know how and why the source code got released btw, since that was the trigger needed to claim the latest "hack" :)




Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Frankie on July 26, 2012, 03:03:59 PM

Quote
In 1992, Stella Liebeck bought coffee at McDonalds. She spilled the hot drink on herself and later claiming injury against McDonalds because the coffee was too hot, initiated a lawsuit for $1 million. She is the poster child for frivolous litigation in the US.

What I failed to mention is that the coffee was served at over 90 degrees celsius and having suffered 3rd degree burns over 16% of her body, she spent 8 days in hospital for skin grafting and required 2 years of medical treatment. When she asked McDonalds to pay $20k to cover the remaining medical expenses which her insurance wouldn’t cover, they rebuked her with an offer of $800. During the case she offered to settle out of court with them for $20k and later $300k which they refused both times. During the case it was found there were 700 other similar court cases where McDonalds had settled out of court.

Actually, the 700 reports (not lawsuits) were over the previous decade.

The coffee was not served over 90 degrees, it was less than 85, and it is served even hotter today at Starbucks.

She sued for millions and millions in damages, and the jury would have given her 2.9 million, but the judge reduced it to $640,000, and the case settled for something more than a half million.

Courts since have routinely rejected the claim that coffee is unreasonably dangerous. McDonalds lost mostly because an executive came off as a jackass.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Bitcoin Oz on July 26, 2012, 03:07:54 PM
We don't have all the information, and I'd avoid leaping to conclusions until you know more. Personally I'm staying out of this as I'm not qualified to make judgements and adequate people are already involved.

Here's an extract from an article (http://bitcoinmedia.com/the-future-cannot-exist-without-the-past/) I wrote:

Quote
In 1992, Stella Liebeck bought coffee at McDonalds. She spilled the hot drink on herself and later claiming injury against McDonalds because the coffee was too hot, initiated a lawsuit for $1 million. She is the poster child for frivolous litigation in the US.

What I failed to mention is that the coffee was served at over 90 degrees celsius and having suffered 3rd degree burns over 16% of her body, she spent 8 days in hospital for skin grafting and required 2 years of medical treatment. When she asked McDonalds to pay $20k to cover the remaining medical expenses which her insurance wouldn’t cover, they rebuked her with an offer of $800. During the case she offered to settle out of court with them for $20k and later $300k which they refused both times. During the case it was found there were 700 other similar court cases where McDonalds had settled out of court.

Still waiting to hear why this matter hasnt been reported to the police by the principals.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: greyhawk on July 26, 2012, 03:18:56 PM
We don't have all the information, and I'd avoid leaping to conclusions until you know more. Personally I'm staying out of this as I'm not qualified to make judgements and adequate people are already involved.

Here's an extract from an article (http://bitcoinmedia.com/the-future-cannot-exist-without-the-past/) I wrote:

Quote
In 1992, Stella Liebeck bought coffee at McDonalds. She spilled the hot drink on herself and later claiming injury against McDonalds because the coffee was too hot, initiated a lawsuit for $1 million. She is the poster child for frivolous litigation in the US.

What I failed to mention is that the coffee was served at over 90 degrees celsius and having suffered 3rd degree burns over 16% of her body, she spent 8 days in hospital for skin grafting and required 2 years of medical treatment. When she asked McDonalds to pay $20k to cover the remaining medical expenses which her insurance wouldn’t cover, they rebuked her with an offer of $800. During the case she offered to settle out of court with them for $20k and later $300k which they refused both times. During the case it was found there were 700 other similar court cases where McDonalds had settled out of court.

Still waiting to hear why this matter hasnt been reported to the police by the principals.

They have to wait until their coffee is less hot.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Coinoisseur on July 26, 2012, 03:30:42 PM
+1


Still waiting to hear why this matter hasnt been reported to the police by the principals.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Raoul Duke on July 26, 2012, 03:47:14 PM
OK, genjix. We will leave Zhou Tong be for now.

Let's talk about the Bitcoinica source code you leaked.
So, the encoded file has the exact same thing on the /bitcoinica_legacy/.git/logs/HEAD file
Code:
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 939e877106a5bd479f350adc6d9e4170c62df8f3 genjix <genjix@nite.(none)> 1338505438 +0200	clone: from git@github.com:bitcoinica/bitcoinica_legacy.git

Cloned by Genjix from the bitcoinica private github repo on May 31 2012... Interesting ;)

And look at who packed it... surprise surprise
Code:
drwxr-xr-x genjix/genjix     0 2012-07-07 20:18 bitcoinica_legacy/


Care to explain the above?


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: davout on July 26, 2012, 04:39:29 PM
OK, genjix. We will leave Zhou Tong be for now.

Let's talk about the Bitcoinica source code you leaked.
So, the encoded file has the exact same thing on the /bitcoinica_legacy/.git/logs/HEAD file
Code:
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 939e877106a5bd479f350adc6d9e4170c62df8f3 genjix <genjix@nite.(none)> 1338505438 +0200	clone: from git@github.com:bitcoinica/bitcoinica_legacy.git

Cloned by Genjix from the bitcoinica private github repo on May 31 2012... Interesting ;)

And look at who packed it... surprise surprise
Code:
drwxr-xr-x genjix/genjix     0 2012-07-07 20:18 bitcoinica_legacy/


Care to explain the above?
^ This


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Raoul Duke on July 26, 2012, 04:45:25 PM
davout, I'm having a dejá vu...

So, the encoded file has the exact same thing on the /bitcoinica_legacy/.git/log/HEAD file
Code:
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 939e877106a5bd479f350adc6d9e4170c62df8f3 genjix <genjix@nite.(none)> 1338505438 +0200	clone: from git@github.com:bitcoinica/bitcoinica_legacy.git

Cloned by Genjix from the bitcoinica private github repo on May 31 2012... Interesting ;)

And look at who packed it... surprise surprise
Code:
drwxr-xr-x genjix/genjix     0 2012-07-07 20:18 bitcoinica_legacy/


And again, please genjix you explain this? Everything is falsifiable but ...

He won't explain shit. If he wanted to explain he would've done it by now.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: lonelyminer (Peter Šurda) on July 26, 2012, 05:11:33 PM
Care to explain the above?
That's easy. Someone hacked genjix' VPS.

But why they haven't involved the police is still a mystery to me.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Raoul Duke on July 26, 2012, 05:20:18 PM
Care to explain the above?
That's easy. Someone hacked genjix' VPS.


Is your (user)name genjix?


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: lonelyminer (Peter Šurda) on July 26, 2012, 05:59:22 PM
Is your (user)name genjix?
Care to explain why I should care about what you think?


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Raoul Duke on July 26, 2012, 06:04:16 PM
Is your (user)name genjix?
Care to explain why I should care about what you think?

I didn't ask the question to you, why would I care about any speculation that comes out of your mouth?

You lost a great oportunity to keep your mouth shut.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: elux on July 26, 2012, 06:05:22 PM
OK, genjix. We will leave Zhou Tong be for now.

Let's talk about the Bitcoinica source code you leaked.
So, the encoded file has the exact same thing on the /bitcoinica_legacy/.git/logs/HEAD file
Code:
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 939e877106a5bd479f350adc6d9e4170c62df8f3 genjix <genjix@nite.(none)> 1338505438 +0200	clone: from git@github.com:bitcoinica/bitcoinica_legacy.git

Cloned by Genjix from the bitcoinica private github repo on May 31 2012... Interesting ;)

And look at who packed it... surprise surprise
Code:
drwxr-xr-x genjix/genjix     0 2012-07-07 20:18 bitcoinica_legacy/


Care to explain the above?

I've been wondering about this. Did you (genjix) leak the entire bitcoinica source code? If so, why?


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: kiba on July 26, 2012, 06:08:18 PM
Genjix is probably not talking because "he stopped yapping and got lawyered up."


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Raoul Duke on July 26, 2012, 06:17:01 PM
Genjix is probably not talking because "he stopped yapping and got lawyered up."

Sorry, I don't believe in that.
The concern was first brought up on July 13. He yapped a lot after that date, even to the point of posting the communications he had with Mr. Seale. He carefully avoided answering about the source code leak that points to him.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: LoupGaroux on July 26, 2012, 06:31:19 PM
Funny how those very same advocates for this being the "Wild Electronic Frontier" and are all for unregulated freedom to conduct business pretty much any which way they want, all become solid Establishment proles when the worm turns against them.

Not a kangaroo court, but you are shocked when people expect you to follow through on your statements?

Innocent until proven guilty, yet by your own admissions you have not followed any other legal requirement in terms of professional practice, business registration, dispute resolution of fiduciary responsibility?

Not a kangaroo court, but you expect the entire world to abide by your random acts of business ethics, contradictory shell game of ownership, and extend you the ability to just walk away from tens of thousands of dollars in value that you assumed IN TRUST?

Innocent until proven guilty, but you hide behind a fabric on lies, non-communication and outright fabrication when confronted with any factual consideration about your actions, and run to find someone else to blame as the "responsible party" in your organization.

Sorry genny old sport, but you can only have one set of rules to play this game. You either follow the path of law and order and full disclosure- in which case you reported this to the authorities months ago when it first happened, and are using your business insurance to make good on all claims, or you want to play cash money big shot playa in the unregulated world, and you take the consequences of dealing with equally unrestricted, and possibly not quite socially restrained victims of your unethical acts.

Hope you are lawyered up with a good one, and a flak vest. You have pissed in the wrong bowl of breakfast cereal.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Gabi on July 26, 2012, 06:46:07 PM
Quote
What I failed to mention is that the coffee was served at over 90 degrees celsius
Excuse me but where is the problem here? Coffee must be HOT, it's made with boiling water, of course it's 90 degree celsius or more!

Americans, they think their shit is coffee and when someone give them real coffee they go to hospital and sue them  :-\


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Herodes on July 26, 2012, 07:10:22 PM
"Selling my name - 2000 BTC:"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2655.0

"Selling myself."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2604.0

Would these still be viable options to cover the funds lost in the 'hacks' ?





Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: lonelyminer (Peter Šurda) on July 26, 2012, 09:09:40 PM
I didn't ask the question to you, why would I care about any speculation that comes out of your mouth?
You wonder, yet complain nevertheless. I am afraid you have to resolve this dichotomy yourself.

Quote
You lost a great oportunity to keep your mouth shut.
I don't always address confused statements, but when I do, I prefer to point out the obvious.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Raoul Duke on July 26, 2012, 09:26:08 PM
I didn't ask the question to you, why would I care about any speculation that comes out of your mouth?
You wonder, yet complain nevertheless. I am afraid you have to resolve this dichotomy yourself.

Quote
You lost a great oportunity to keep your mouth shut.
I don't always address confused statements, but when I do, I prefer to point out the obvious.

Stop making a fool of yourself. We all know the Bitcoin Consultancy invited you to talk at the London conference.
Did they also hired you to be their spokesman on all other matters?


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Transisto on July 26, 2012, 11:38:39 PM
... Personally I'm staying out of this as I'm not qualified to make judgements and adequate people are already involved.

Here's an extract from an article (http://bitcoinmedia.com/the-future-cannot-exist-without-the-past/) I wrote:

Quote
In 1992, Stella Liebeck bought coffee at McDonalds. She spilled the hot drink on herself and later claiming injury against McDonalds because the coffee was too hot, initiated a lawsuit for $1 million. She is the poster child for frivolous litigation in the US.

What I failed to mention is that the coffee was served at over 90 degrees celsius and having suffered 3rd degree burns over 16% of her body, she spent 8 days in hospital for skin grafting and required 2 years of medical treatment. When she asked McDonalds to pay $20k to cover the remaining medical expenses which her insurance wouldn’t cover, they rebuked her with an offer of $800. During the case she offered to settle out of court with them for $20k and later $300k which they refused both times. During the case it was found there were 700 other similar court cases where McDonalds had settled out of court.
Why start a thread only to say : "Personally I'm staying out of this" while it has been Intersango's status-quo for the last 2 months ?

This empty statement is only adding gas to the fire.

The only similarity I found with your McDonald case is that I'd like more than the price of the coffee refunded. And I'd expect that compensation to come from all negligent parties involved.

PS : I have 32 page of new comments about this to go through, What make you think I'd want to read about a McDonald Coffee spill ?


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: lonelyminer (Peter Šurda) on July 26, 2012, 11:43:34 PM
Stop making a fool of yourself.
I appreciate your advice, but I believe I am perfectly capable of handling myself.

We all know the Bitcoin Consultancy invited you to talk at the London conference.
Bitcoin Consultancy did not invite me, I applied. I have been working on economic research of Bitcoin for over a year. I know genjix from previous Bitcoin meeting/conference so I suppose that might make it a bit easier to apply. From there I also remember genjix talking about his setup, that he stores all his data on one VPS.

However, my relationship with genjix has exactly zero effect on my relationship with Bitcoinica, as I'm one of the biggest Bitcoinica creditors who got nothing back so far.

Did they also hired you to be their spokesman on all other matters?
I am not associated with Bitcoinica. I am actually member of the Bitcoinica Fund Recovery Initiative (http://www.bitcoinica-recovery.org), a group of creditors attempting to get their deposits back.

However, I am also someone with the urge to point out errors and biases in other people's claims. I can be pretty stubborn and persistent about this.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: ninjarobot on July 27, 2012, 03:47:38 PM
We don't have all the information, and I'd avoid leaping to conclusions until you know more. Personally I'm staying out of this as I'm not qualified to make judgements and adequate people are already involved.

Genjix, what is Bitcoinica LP doing in all of this? It seems it is possible to recover the majority of funds lost in the last MtGox compromise. Bitcoinica owes it to their customers to make the utmost effort to retrieve these funds which now seem within reach. Please tell me that 'adequate people' includes Bitcoinica LP representatives. So far I have only seen Patrick post funny youtube videos to the statement thread from AurumXchange, MtGox and BitInstant which is aggrevating as a Bitcoinica Customer that has over 30K locked up in Bitcoinica for the last 2.5 months.





Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: kokjo on August 04, 2012, 07:59:35 AM
you are wrong!
this is a kangaroo court!
you are guity to proven otherwise.
this it not some highly ethical lawyer shit.
this is angry people who think you have stolen their money.
this is the gun-or-bat people, who does not trust in the any legal system, calling themselves anarchists.
these anarchistic people, will hurt you, if you don't give them their money back.

bitcoin gained popularity not among lawyers, politicians, and highly moral people.
bitcoin gained popularity among people with guns, people who does not respect the law, drugdealers, and other people who can hurt you.


Title: Re: This is not a kangaroo court - innocent until proven guilty
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on August 04, 2012, 08:41:04 AM
you are wrong!
this is a kangaroo court!
you are guity to proven otherwise.
this it not some highly ethical lawyer shit.
this is angry people who think you have stolen their money.
this is the gun-or-bat people, who does not trust in the any legal system, calling themselves anarchists.
these anarchistic people, will hurt you, if you don't give them their money back.

bitcoin gained popularity not among lawyers, politicians, and highly moral people.
bitcoin gained popularity among people with guns, people who does not respect the law, drugdealers, and other people who can hurt you.

I believe that he, or them behind "he", have no fear of any anarchists. Now, if this were a person in the states, and he was outed out, then he may have reason to be concerned. I, myself, would travel cross-country to stick ONE alpaca sock in his mailbox, letting him know that I know, prior to passing the address along, thus probably not getting more socks in his mailbox--a dead fish comes to mind (and I don't mean sushi).

~Bruno~