|
Title: California Is Seriously Trying To Force Porn Actresses To Wear Safety Goggles Post by: (oYo) on June 02, 2015, 07:09:50 AM http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Me2FZWfzfjg/UoF7QyGhDnI/AAAAAAAA6YE/lVIS-JgIKr8/s400/James-Deen-Jessica-Drake-PSA.jpghttps://maggiemcneill.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/danger-wear-goggles-sign.png http://alternativemediasyndicate.com/2015/05/29/california-is-seriously-trying-to-force-pr0n-actresses-to-wear-safety-goggles-on-set/ Quote It’s really too ridiculous to even seem real, but we can assure you that this is not satire. California has introduced new regulations that will require actors in the pornography industry to wear protective GOGGLES while on set. The proposals has some more modest proposals, including medical visits, condoms and Hepatitis B treatments. But the goggles requirement has more than a few scratching their heads. What is California thinking? The proposed set of regulations in California was just published on Thursday by the state Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board. They say that goggles could help prevent the spread of STDs. Porn actors Jessica Drake and James Dean even made a satirical clip about the ridiculous measures California has been imposing. That’s a snippet from it in the background of our title image. The 21-page proposal of regulations is the product of no less than 5-years of hearings and “research” from the government agency, which details the preventative measures they say will “keep performers safe.” The Free Speech Coalition released a statement in response, saying “These are regulations designed for medical settings, and are unworkable on an adult film set – or even a Hollywood film set.” “We’ve come to San Diego with ways to amend the regulations,” they added, saying that they have “input from both performers and public health officials, in ways that protect adult film performers without stigmatizing and shutting down an entire industry.” These new rules are set to be finalized next March. Again, this is not satire. Read the 21-page proposal for yourself, if you haven’t already. Honestly, we don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Kinda gives new meaning to the use of hard hats. Title: Re: California Is Seriously Trying To Force Porn Actresses To Wear Safety Goggles Post by: 1Referee on June 02, 2015, 12:47:42 PM Better safe than sorry :D
Title: Re: California Is Seriously Trying To Force Porn Actresses To Wear Safety Goggles Post by: Morecoin Freeman on June 02, 2015, 01:11:33 PM Well, at least they don't blur everything out like they do in Japanese porn.
Title: Re: California Is Seriously Trying To Force Porn Actresses To Wear Safety Goggles Post by: ayesha201006 on June 02, 2015, 04:17:22 PM This can't be for real can it? Why not just ban porn making in California then? If they don't want the tax dollars I am sure some one else does. And how could safety goggles possibly protect an actor? On second thought I probably don't want to know.
Title: Re: California Is Seriously Trying To Force Porn Actresses To Wear Safety Goggles Post by: JohnnyBTCSeed on June 03, 2015, 05:28:08 AM Umm hello people. Work place accidents are real.
Brandy-Lynne Ridez gets a cum shot in her eye... and now it's infected. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyTnsOdXFUo Title: Re: California Is Seriously Trying To Force Porn Actresses To Wear Safety Goggles Post by: UliJonHoth on June 03, 2015, 05:47:48 AM Quote The 21-page proposal of regulations is the product of no less than 5-years of hearings and “research” from the government agency, which details the preventative measures they say will “keep performers safe.” And how many tax dollars were spent while doing this research over 5 years...? I'm sure the bukkake crowd is real happy about all of this. Title: Re: California Is Seriously Trying To Force Porn Actresses To Wear Safety Goggles Post by: altcoinhosting on June 03, 2015, 05:48:31 AM Wow, the article links to some .gov-sites, chances are it's not a hoax and they're actually trying to hurt their own economy.
Wether they like to admit it or not, california is one of the biggest exporters of adult related content. Personally, i don't really care where the content comes from (as long as i can sell it), but i guess measures like this will hurt their tax income over time... Title: Re: California Is Seriously Trying To Force Porn Actresses To Wear Safety Goggles Post by: Lethn on June 03, 2015, 05:48:39 AM Well, at least they don't blur everything out like they do in Japanese porn. I will have vengeance for that kind of censorship. But seriously, wtf? Well I still don't think this can really trump the UK's version of health and safety madness. Title: Re: California Is Seriously Trying To Force Porn Actresses To Wear Safety Goggles Post by: Finchy on June 03, 2015, 09:16:37 AM This can't be for real can it? Why not just ban porn making in California then? If they don't want the tax dollars I am sure some one else does. And how could safety goggles possibly protect an actor? On second thought I probably don't want to know. This is what will happen if this actually gets passed so they're just hurting their own tax money. People will just start shooting porn in a different state without such regulations. Didn't California pass a law where the performers had to use condoms as well or was that not passed and just proposed? I remember reading about that somewhere. |
