Bitcoin Forum

Other => Meta => Topic started by: DiamondCardz on June 11, 2015, 05:45:51 PM



Title: Do "PM sent" posts qualify as LQ/spam posts?
Post by: DiamondCardz on June 11, 2015, 05:45:51 PM
These posts serve absolutely no purpose - why do you need to post on the thread stating you have PM'd the OP? It's useless. If it's to notify the OP, well, people get pop-up notifications when they have un-read private messages and it can be kind of hard to miss a new PM. They're essentially useless posts that are just there to prop up post counts.


Title: Re: Do "PM sent" posts qualify as LQ/spam posts?
Post by: Quickseller on June 11, 2015, 05:52:33 PM
A lot of people sell various things via alt accounts and will then either watch or post on the thread from their main account. If you are not logged into the account you are trading from then you will have no way of knowing that you received a PM unless someone posts that they sent a PM.


Title: Re: Do "PM sent" posts qualify as LQ/spam posts?
Post by: erikalui on June 11, 2015, 06:38:22 PM
It's because some people don't respond to the PMs and don't even check their inbox. They usually check their own threads and hence when you say that you have sent them a PM, they go and check their inbox (it's necessary as sometimes a member who has offered a job/task receives too many PMs and hence he doesn't respond to all or misses out some pms). I know it's sounds silly but it's necessary to do that especially when it's a task in the Services section as usually people need just 1-2 members to do their work and when there is no reply on their thread, another member thinks that nobody is doing that job when actually they might be.


Title: Re: Do "PM sent" posts qualify as LQ/spam posts?
Post by: DiamondCardz on June 11, 2015, 06:51:47 PM
It's because some people don't respond to the PMs and don't even check their inbox. They usually check their own threads and hence when you say that you have sent them a PM, they go and check their inbox (it's necessary as sometimes a member who has offered a job/task receives too many PMs and hence he doesn't respond to all or misses out some pms). I know it's sounds silly but it's necessary to do that especially when it's a task in the Services section as usually people need just 1-2 members to do their work and when there is no reply on their thread, another member thinks that nobody is doing that job when actually they might be.

Hmm, I see. It's kind of hard in my opinion to not notice PMs though, but I guess that's a valid argument. Surely the pop up notification that tells you about an unread private message draws your attention to it, though?


Title: Re: Do "PM sent" posts qualify as LQ/spam posts?
Post by: --Encrypted-- on June 11, 2015, 06:54:49 PM
It's because some people don't respond to the PMs and don't even check their inbox. They usually check their own threads and hence when you say that you have sent them a PM, they go and check their inbox (it's necessary as sometimes a member who has offered a job/task receives too many PMs and hence he doesn't respond to all or misses out some pms). I know it's sounds silly but it's necessary to do that especially when it's a task in the Services section as usually people need just 1-2 members to do their work and when there is no reply on their thread, another member thinks that nobody is doing that job when actually they might be.

Hmm, I see. It's kind of hard in my opinion to not notice PMs though, but I guess that's a valid argument. Surely the pop up notification that tells you about an unread private message draws your attention to it, though?

looks like that feature is actually an option that's disabled by default... either that or I changed it and forgot.


Title: Re: Do "PM sent" posts qualify as LQ/spam posts?
Post by: DiamondCardz on June 11, 2015, 06:56:44 PM
It's because some people don't respond to the PMs and don't even check their inbox. They usually check their own threads and hence when you say that you have sent them a PM, they go and check their inbox (it's necessary as sometimes a member who has offered a job/task receives too many PMs and hence he doesn't respond to all or misses out some pms). I know it's sounds silly but it's necessary to do that especially when it's a task in the Services section as usually people need just 1-2 members to do their work and when there is no reply on their thread, another member thinks that nobody is doing that job when actually they might be.

Hmm, I see. It's kind of hard in my opinion to not notice PMs though, but I guess that's a valid argument. Surely the pop up notification that tells you about an unread private message draws your attention to it, though?

looks like that feature is actually an option that's disabled by default... either that or I changed it and forgot.

It is? I never remember enabling it, perhaps it just slipped my memory then...that's understandable if it isn't enabled by default, I was assuming it was as I never remember having enabled it. Alright then, thanks. I'll lock the thread, question has been answered.