Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: Envrin on June 19, 2015, 09:35:56 PM



Title: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Envrin on June 19, 2015, 09:35:56 PM

http://motherboard.vice.com/en_ca/read/the-canadian-senate-announced-its-bitcoin-report-in-a-totally-appropriate-way

Thanks Canada. :)


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: SpanishSoldier on June 19, 2015, 10:02:46 PM
Then Eobot & Xapo might like to get registered from Canada.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: knight22 on June 19, 2015, 10:25:33 PM
https://i.imgur.com/wW1dH66.gif


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: ajareselde on June 19, 2015, 10:28:32 PM
Really nice piece of news. Love how they tried out new approach and sent the message via blockchain :)
Looks like Swiss have a competition @bitcoin legal infrastructure!

cheers


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: pedrog on June 20, 2015, 12:14:11 AM
That was pretty awesome!

Is this the first time a government posts a message on the blockchain?


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: knight22 on June 20, 2015, 01:53:39 AM
That was pretty awesome!

Is this the first time a government posts a message on the blockchain?

AFAIK yes.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: anderson00673 on June 20, 2015, 01:56:39 AM
Ha!  Take that, stupid wallstreet banks.  Can't bribe them all I guess.  Lets hope that this sets the precedent for other nations to follow in the future, although I doubt that it will happen in the usa, ever.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: melody82 on June 20, 2015, 02:01:10 AM
Finally a government with its head in the proper place (not up its ass).  All of these regulations in the usa, which are bought by big banks to kill competition, are just absurd.  Why not choose some other random currency to make strange rules about?  Why not the Indonesian rupiah?  I am sure that one has some sort of insidious underground purpose.

Today we are not going to blame Canada, we are going to thank them :)


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: QuestionAuthority on June 20, 2015, 02:01:24 AM
Let's all move to Canada. I'll rent a bus.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: futureofbitcoin on June 20, 2015, 02:49:17 AM
Let's all move to Canada. I'll rent a bus.

except it'll be pain in the butt buying bitcoins here because the canadian exchanges are pretty much dead, so you'd have to exchange your canadian dollars to us dollars and then use some foreign bitcoin exchange.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: QuestionAuthority on June 20, 2015, 03:09:55 AM
Let's all move to Canada. I'll rent a bus.

except it'll be pain in the butt buying bitcoins here because the canadian exchanges are pretty much dead, so you'd have to exchange your canadian dollars to us dollars and then use some foreign bitcoin exchange.

You open the exchange. Jesus Christ, do I have to do everything? I'm already renting the bus!


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: aso118 on June 20, 2015, 03:35:39 AM
The article makes an interesting observation about the powers of different states.

In February, Quebec updated its financial policies to require operators of Bitcoin exchanges—where people can buy Bitcoin for regular money—and ATMs to obtain a license.

I do hope the state governments sync their policies with those of the center.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: mercistheman on June 20, 2015, 04:48:54 AM
Let's all move to Canada. I'll rent a bus.

except it'll be pain in the butt buying bitcoins here because the canadian exchanges are pretty much dead, so you'd have to exchange your canadian dollars to us dollars and then use some foreign bitcoin exchange.

You open the exchange. Jesus Christ, do I have to do everything? I'm already renting the bus!
Man's got a point... buses ain't cheap... Hop on the bus, Gus
You don’t need to discuss much.

How easy/hard is it for a US citizen to open a Canadian bank account?
 


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Envrin on June 20, 2015, 05:07:43 AM
How easy/hard is it for a US citizen to open a Canadian bank account?

I think you unfortunately have to be a legal immigrant in this day and age.  You can get a SIN# (same as SSN#) as an illegal immigrant, but it's going to start with a 9, which banks will no longer allow without additional documentation.  Aside from that, 2 pieces of ID, a utility bill, and you have a bank account.

EDIT:  You have TD Bank in the US, correct?  Contact them, and say you want to open a Canadian account.  Should be easy.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Amph on June 20, 2015, 07:09:16 AM
"Regardless, it appears as though the Canada’s federal government is ramping up to take a global lead with Bitcoin by letting it flourish before trying to control it."

so this is their plan in their end, this is why many Gov are not hindering bitcoin, they want it to become big first, before trying to get their hands on it


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: S4VV4S on June 20, 2015, 07:46:18 AM
"Regardless, it appears as though the Canada’s federal government is ramping up to take a global lead with Bitcoin by letting it flourish before trying to control it."

so this is their plan in their end, this is why many Gov are not hindering bitcoin, they want it to become big first, before trying to get their hands on it

Well, there is no point on wasting time and money trying to regulate something that is currently only used by a few.
Let it get bigger and therefor worth your while, and then regulate it.
By then, you will have more chances of success because there is a large portion already using it and work with/for it.
Sure, some companies (like Xapo for example) might choose to relocate if they don't like the regulation,
but we should not forget that they will still have the normal Buitcoin user which will not relocate and will continue to use and get taxed on Bitcoin.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: pooya87 on June 20, 2015, 09:11:04 AM
wow. this is really a great news for bitcoin. i think we are going to see many improvements in bitcoin world in the future and may of them are going to be from Canada.
and i loved their cheeky play of embedding the message in blockchain from their 1Canada... address (http://coinsecrets.org/?to=361625.000003) :D


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 20, 2015, 11:37:08 AM
That's pretty cool of Canada, nice to see a government try & look to the future & not penalise those who try to be innovative by handicapping them with ridiculous regulations. Can't believe they sent out the message via the blockchain though, think I might move to Canada & start a new life there ;D ........ Well maybe not in their winter, it's awful :)


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Velkro on June 20, 2015, 12:15:40 PM
This is huge, canada got really smart goverment.
Kudos to them.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: bitnanigans on June 20, 2015, 12:43:43 PM
Whoop! Time to move to Canada! I wonder what it'll take to set up a business there.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Hollingsworth on June 22, 2015, 02:01:01 AM
Maybe its time to move to the great white north, where the beers are cold, the girls are warm, and the bitcoin is welcome.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: rexxarofmoknathal on June 22, 2015, 02:14:31 AM
Heh, guess the perks of living here go beyond health care for once. This is some nice news  :D


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: ThEmporium on June 22, 2015, 02:24:52 AM

http://motherboard.vice.com/en_ca/read/the-canadian-senate-announced-its-bitcoin-report-in-a-totally-appropriate-way

Thanks Canada. :)


That's great news. Hope this would happen in various parts of countries too, the way this digital coin innovated is entirely in legitimate way. Ironically, this legitimate ideas never get digested by many governmental authorities, as everyone knows that all government sectors has few corrupt people everywhere in this world.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: aigeezer on June 22, 2015, 02:52:37 AM
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but here are a few factoids about Canada:

1. The Canadian Senate is not an elected body. Members are appointed by the actual government. Appointments are historically patronage gigs for old party loyalists. The present prime minister (the actual head of government) campaigned on replacing the senate with an elected body but, once in office, continued the practice of appointing hacks to the senate instead. One such appointment is in full scandal mode right now: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/topic/Tag/Mike%20Duffy%20trial

2. Senate reports are sometimes used as trial balloons by a government. If well received, the actual government decision-makers (in the House of Commons) might make it their policy. Otherwise it can be ignored as "just a Senate report", which is the norm.

3. Canadian winters are as varied as the country, which is larger than the US (sorry about that). I have even lived in a Canadian area, admittedly a small one, with a true Mediterranean climate - people grow figs outdoors, protected only by bird netting. I'm not saying where in the country it is though - just in case.       ;)

4. Canada has no "states". The Canadian equivalents are provinces and territories. You are right (upthread) that these governments may or may not come up with their own BTC policies - I hope nothing like Lawsky's caper in New York, but - perhaps ominously - the Senate committee made a field trip to New York as part of their "investigation", according to Canadian media. I imagine it was probably just an excuse for shopping and nightlife, but you never know.

tl/dr The Canadian Senate is not the voice of the Canadian Government. Canadian government policy re BTC is not yet announced. This might hint at good news to come or it might not. Watch and wait.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Hippie Tech on June 22, 2015, 04:54:46 AM
When they should decide to cut off your power and/or internet, your hard earned money will most definitely be HANDS OFF.



Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Kprawn on June 22, 2015, 06:10:49 AM
Well, whatever they are doing... it's looking real good for Bitcoin. I hope the New York Bitcoiners will take note and relocate to these Bitcoin-friendly environments.

Thank you Andreas for opening the door for Bitcoin in Canada. Your inputs would most definately have made a difference in their decision towards this matter. They looked like the coolest bunch of people in government compared to the "stiff necks" we have to deal with in our country.  >:(

Let's hope the final dicision on this matter will also be in Bitcoins favor.  ;)


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: afriezalie on June 22, 2015, 07:14:08 AM
Wow this is a good news :o. They allowed bitcoin and admit bitcoin, this is a good news to bitcoin network. I hope with this news, bitcoin network will spread quickly over Canadian  ;D
Right now there are no many countries accept bitcoin, but Canada allowed it. This is so cool 8), i hope my country will do this too ::)


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Kakmakr on June 22, 2015, 11:09:37 AM
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but here are a few factoids about Canada:

1. The Canadian Senate is not an elected body. Members are appointed by the actual government. Appointments are historically patronage gigs for old party loyalists. The present prime minister (the actual head of government) campaigned on replacing the senate with an elected body but, once in office, continued the practice of appointing hacks to the senate instead. One such appointment is in full scandal mode right now: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/topic/Tag/Mike%20Duffy%20trial

2. Senate reports are sometimes used as trial balloons by a government. If well received, the actual government decision-makers (in the House of Commons) might make it their policy. Otherwise it can be ignored as "just a Senate report", which is the norm.

3. Canadian winters are as varied as the country, which is larger than the US (sorry about that). I have even lived in a Canadian area, admittedly a small one, with a true Mediterranean climate - people grow figs outdoors, protected only by bird netting. I'm not saying where in the country it is though - just in case.       ;)

4. Canada has no "states". The Canadian equivalents are provinces and territories. You are right (upthread) that these governments may or may not come up with their own BTC policies - I hope nothing like Lawsky's caper in New York, but - perhaps ominously - the Senate committee made a field trip to New York as part of their "investigation", according to Canadian media. I imagine it was probably just an excuse for shopping and nightlife, but you never know.

tl/dr The Canadian Senate is not the voice of the Canadian Government. Canadian government policy re BTC is not yet announced. This might hint at good news to come or it might not. Watch and wait.

Looks like you have some inside knowledge to the inner workings of the Canadian Government. Thanks for the information. Just a question or two: What percentage of these reports end up as policy?
Can the merchants and vendors accept Bitcoin as a payment method, before policy have been formulated?
I thought about going there, but I am from a country with warmer average temperatures and it's damn cold up there. 


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Herbert2020 on June 22, 2015, 11:14:38 AM
this is a great news for bitcoin in my opinion. a country's government declaring bitcoin is going to be huge. it is time to move to Canada :) i wonder how it will affect the price of bitcoin in the future.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: okae on June 22, 2015, 11:58:06 AM
if i was in love with Canada, now im 150% in love with it.

thats a pretty good news and this is the big step needed, the first step, now is just a question of time that others do the same, is unavoidable.

ty for the link man, i love to start the day with great news like this one :P


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: unamis76 on June 22, 2015, 12:23:33 PM
Well... That was a master kick, sort to say... It was a masterpiece publishing it on the blockchain, good call!

And they don't want to regulate anything apparently... Perfect. Too perfect to be true :)


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: aigeezer on June 22, 2015, 01:02:05 PM
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but here are a few factoids about Canada:

1. The Canadian Senate is not an elected body. Members are appointed by the actual government. Appointments are historically patronage gigs for old party loyalists. The present prime minister (the actual head of government) campaigned on replacing the senate with an elected body but, once in office, continued the practice of appointing hacks to the senate instead. One such appointment is in full scandal mode right now: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/topic/Tag/Mike%20Duffy%20trial

2. Senate reports are sometimes used as trial balloons by a government. If well received, the actual government decision-makers (in the House of Commons) might make it their policy. Otherwise it can be ignored as "just a Senate report", which is the norm.

3. Canadian winters are as varied as the country, which is larger than the US (sorry about that). I have even lived in a Canadian area, admittedly a small one, with a true Mediterranean climate - people grow figs outdoors, protected only by bird netting. I'm not saying where in the country it is though - just in case.       ;)

4. Canada has no "states". The Canadian equivalents are provinces and territories. You are right (upthread) that these governments may or may not come up with their own BTC policies - I hope nothing like Lawsky's caper in New York, but - perhaps ominously - the Senate committee made a field trip to New York as part of their "investigation", according to Canadian media. I imagine it was probably just an excuse for shopping and nightlife, but you never know.

tl/dr The Canadian Senate is not the voice of the Canadian Government. Canadian government policy re BTC is not yet announced. This might hint at good news to come or it might not. Watch and wait.

Looks like you have some inside knowledge to the inner workings of the Canadian Government. Thanks for the information. Just a question or two: What percentage of these reports end up as policy?
Can the merchants and vendors accept Bitcoin as a payment method, before policy have been formulated?
I thought about going there, but I am from a country with warmer average temperatures and it's damn cold up there. 

Thanks. I have lived in Canada for a long time, but I am not a political junkie. I usually try to ignore all politicians and hope they will treat me with, at best, benign neglect. That said, I thought it would be easy to Google an answer to your first question, "What percentage of these reports end up as policy?" - not so, it turns out. Anecdotally, I'd say almost nothing that originates in the Senate becomes law unless it was planted by the party in power - for example, a controversial idea that could be discussed without the government appearing to own it until the government could tell which way the wind was blowing. I'm not saying this is a bad thing - it is what it is. Anyway, anecdotal answers are not really much use, so here is something a bit more substantial:

1. A long, dreary government-published spin piece which attempts to justify the Senate nevertheless starts with this:

"Among the governing institutions of Canada, the Canadian Senate is virtually unequalled in its ability to attract criticism and derision. The Upper Chamber has been described as unrepresentative of the Canadian people, a "lobby" for the nation's business élites, responsible to no one, and undemocratic."

 - and concludes with this:

"Public opinion polls have shown a steady increase in the number of Canadians who feel that the Upper Chamber should be abolished.  In a poll released on 22 July 1993, Gallup Canada reported that 54% of Canadians favoured abolition, the highest percentage ever recorded by the organization. The results of the poll, according to Gallup, reflected "the public attitude towards an institution that is perceived by many to have outlived its usefulness." In light of the record low levels of esteem accorded the Senate in recent public opinion polls, committees of the Upper House face enormous challenges if they wish to be effective...."

http://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/BP/bp361-e.htm#ASSESSING

2. The gory details on how federal law is made in Canada (or rather the public face of the process): http://library.queensu.ca/gov/bills_federal

Your second question, "Can the merchants and vendors accept Bitcoin as a payment method, before policy have been formulated?" is interesting. I am no lawyer, but my sense is that governments anywhere can and do make things retroactively illegal from time to time, so you just never know what they might come up with on any particular day (Cyprus bail-in, for example). That said, I routinely buy stuff from NewEgg and TigerDirect's Canadian sites and pay with BTC (yay!). In general there is no sense that BTC is somehow forbidden in Canada. In the Vancouver area, there is a group actively getting merchants, one by one, to accept BTC payments. Things are more spotty in the rest of the country, I think, but definitely no sense of "forbidden".

Re your comment about average temperatures - my cheeky response is to ask if you ever heard about the statistician who drowned in a river that had an average depth of one foot? There are places to live in Canada that have very pleasant weather year-round (see my fig tree comment in my first post).

My main theme though - this Senate report is definitely not the breakthrough portrayed in the OP headline and assumed by many commenters. It may still be a good thing, but it would be a mistake to view it through an American lens as many people try to do - things work differently in Canada, and most of what you think you know about the country may be, um, wrong.  ;)


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: spazzdla on June 22, 2015, 01:32:35 PM
Careful now, with Bill C51 the pigs can threaten you to give them all your wealth or imprison you for life just by claiming you are a terrorist..


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: knight22 on June 25, 2015, 01:50:43 AM
And now they just published this info-graphic:

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/SEN/Committee/412/banc/rms/12jun15/Infographic-e.htm


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: aigeezer on June 25, 2015, 02:50:10 AM
Careful now, with Bill C51 the pigs can threaten you to give them all your wealth or imprison you for life just by claiming you are a terrorist..

Yikes, after reading the Bill C51..... i would never set foot on Canada soil.

I suggest everyone to read up on the bill thats just passed last month.

You think America is bad,.... well then this bill would be a nightmare.


If you don't mind reading some detail, one of the opposition politicians spoke eloquently against the bill and suggested that it will be repealed if his party wins Canada's federal election this Fall: https://openparliament.ca/debates/2015/5/5/randall-garrison-2/only/
To bypass much of the detail, skip to his motion - the indented bit towards the end - to get the flavour of what he said.

Whether they win and whether they repeal the bill are two different matters, but at least he spoke up. Meanwhile, C51 is apparently the law of the land now.





Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Envrin on June 25, 2015, 04:43:04 AM
Yikes, after reading the Bill C51..... i would never set foot on Canada soil.

Yeah, that bill is beyond ridiculous.  Everyone has been complaining about the Patriot Act for over a decade, but Bill C51 puts that to shame.  I'm Canadian myself, and it's not fun to see your home country take that route.

On the flip side, Harper's government may have just ensured their loss in the next federal election thanks to that bill.  For example, Alberta was previously under a Conservative government for 44 years, but in the election that happened recently, NDP won by a landslide including majority govt.  There's a chance something similar may happen in the next federal election, and if a party like NDP gets control, you can expect Bill C51 to be thrown into the fiery pits of hell where it belongs.



Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: qiwoman2 on June 25, 2015, 05:25:35 AM
It's funny that I lived in Canada for seven years and just moved to Europe a few months ago so let's see if our European counterparts will follow suite. Unfortunately here in Cyprus a big bitcoin site scammed a lot of locals so it may take time here for it to gain any real traction but still this is a victory for Bitcoiners the world over seeing Canada is a pretty big country. This is clever on their part to be on trend for once and not follow the U.S around.. :)


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: rokkyroad on June 25, 2015, 05:37:11 AM
Quote
Among the governing institutions of Canada, the Canadian Senate is virtually unequalled in its ability to attract criticism and derision

The Canadian Senators have been stealing the country blind for years. Canadian news has been reporting the thievery scandals for the past year or more. I'm sure the Senate views Btc as another avenue to befuddle expense accounts.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Kprawn on June 25, 2015, 05:53:27 AM
Wow, I have learned a lot about the Canadian politics in this thread. Why do they still have a Senate, if the reports they make have no impact or final say? They already have the House of Commons to make these decisions. {Or does the Senate do the leg work, and the House of commons the rubber stamp?}

To us out here, it looks like the Senate is the dog without teeth. They make a noise, but have no real power.

Andreas should have pitched his speech to the House of Commons for better results... but I guess it does not work that way. {I know very little about Canadian politics, and my government work totally different from theirs} 


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: aigeezer on June 25, 2015, 12:47:01 PM
Why do they still have a Senate, if the reports they make have no impact or final say?

Here is one answer to your question: http://www.thecanadaguide.com/the-senate

Teaser quote from the link:

"By far the most controversial institution in the Canadian system of government, the Canadian Senate has very few supporters. Modeled after the British House of Lords, it was originally supposed to allow representatives of Canada’s wealthy elite to veto legislation passed by politicians representing the common people — an idea which has not aged particularly well, as you might imagine. It’s thus hard to talk about the Senate in modern Canada without also mentioning either the word “reform” or “abolishment,” but neither has been seriously attempted to date."

Another way to ask why the senate still exists is the classic "cui bono" (who benefits?) question. It must serve somebody's needs, so who and what interests are served by it. That's a good way to approach anything one finds puzzling in human affairs, I think. With that in mind, why in the heck have they come out in favour of BTC? It is completely contrary to their usual style.

To make things even more puzzling, here is a pro-senate opinion piece published in a major Canadian newspaper which normally opposes the current government's policies. I think this defence of the senate is a very long stretch, but it has some truth to it. The theme is something like "some of the senators occasionally do good things because they have a sinecure and thus have less to fear than people who must answer to voters - because of this they occasionally dig deeply into some important issue or other - and therefore Canada needs its senate (cough)."

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2013/08/22/why_canada_needs_the_senate.html

Canada has two major political parties, which I think of as Tweedledum and Tweedledee. During the present Harperium, the senate has been loaded up with Harper's loyalists but before that it was notoriously filled with hacks from the party in power at any given time, resulting in a rough balance of (somewhat competing) vested interests. Canada's long-time third party, which I think of as Tweedlethree, has a chance to win in this year's Fall election, but you never know. Because it has not been in power before, it does not have its share of hacks in the senate. Will it succumb to temptation if its turn comes? Who knows?

Canada, like many countries, lurches from one election to the next in a "throw the rascals out" mood - replacing one set of rascals with the gang it threw out the time before. This time it's different (heh) in the sense that the party that may finally get its turn in power does not have the same baggage that the others do.

One more tidbit about Canadian politics - the present government has a large majority in parliament but only about 40% of the voters chose them. How do you get a majority with only 40% of the votes? Easy - you make sure the other 60% are split between or among various opposition parties. It's a trick long-exploited by all parties, and it pretty much ensures that any government "majority" is not the same thing as an actual majority - year after year, decade after decade.

Ain't it awful?         :)

tl/dr: Given the nature of the Canadian senate, why is it in favour of BTC? Cui bono? This is a really important question, imho.






Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: dblink on June 25, 2015, 12:56:23 PM
Wow this is a good news :o. They allowed bitcoin and admit bitcoin, this is a good news to bitcoin network. I hope with this news, bitcoin network will spread quickly over Canadian  ;D
Right now there are no many countries accept bitcoin, but Canada allowed it. This is so cool 8), i hope my country will do this too ::)
Do not worry, you country will soon implement the bitcoin digital currency system in their monetary funds. As soon as Canada starts transitioning with bitcoin digital currency, the other countries will surely follow it, since it will be an eye opener for other major powerful countries in this world.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: spazzdla on June 25, 2015, 01:23:26 PM
Democracy is an utter joke.

America has Person A and Person B who work for the Central banks.

Canada has Person A(the blues), Person B(The reds) and Person C(The orange) who all work for the central banks.


Democracy has failed.. The banks must have a serious plan for crypto.. it is a great tool to completely control the finances of your serfs... :S.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: Hazir on June 25, 2015, 01:58:18 PM
Main government is on the right path but as we can read, provinces of Canada are not so happy about it:

"Of course, that doesn’t mean that Canada’s provinces haven’t tried their hand at overseeing Bitcoin in some capacity. In February, Quebec updated its financial policies to require operators of Bitcoin exchanges—where people can buy Bitcoin for regular money—and ATMs to obtain a license. A recently finalized piece of legislation in new York also requires licenses for Bitcoin businesses, and it received widespread criticism for threatening to stifle innovation."

We could have different laws in each province similar as we have now different tax law in each state. But I expect bitcoin price to rise after this news nonetheless.


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: gogxmagog on June 25, 2015, 04:00:08 PM
Canadian govt for all its flaws does actually have a history of encouraging innovation in fields of science and technological by. I think this is just another example. It's like a photo op for these politicos. Support a oddball tech gizmo thingy and get your name in the paper.
Still, it's good news, and I look forewarn to seeing doors open and support offered to innovators in the crypto sphere in Canada. We give out grant money for almost anything else, might as well throw some at BTC. This senate ruling is just the beginning!


Title: Re: Canadian Government Decides -- Bitcoin is Hands Off -- No Real Regulation
Post by: BillyBobZorton on June 25, 2015, 05:25:21 PM
There are pros and cons on what they said.. my biggest concern it seems like they will be pushing an agenda to regulate exchange that only deal with crypto. Remember how Poloniex got fucked by Fincen and got them forced to demand information to their users? Well imagine this happens to every single exchange even if they don't deal with any fiats.

It's not bad overall but with some bad points.