|
Title: [2015-07-31] [bitcoin-dev] A summary of block size hardfork proposals Post by: LiteCoinGuy on July 31, 2015, 02:32:14 PM [bitcoin-dev] A summary of block size hardfork proposals
BIP100 by Jeff BIP101 by Gavin BIP102 by Jeff BIP??? by Pieter (called "BIP103" below) At this point, it's illogical and dangerous to support any proposal that doesn't implement a coded super-majorty consensus. So that would eliminate BIP102 and BIP103 immediately. Then of the other two proposals, I believe 32mb is too small for a maximum. I don't want to be in this situation again in a few years. BIP101 is the smartest proposal and thinks the furthest ahead to avoid future problems. https://de.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3f9il8/bitcoindev_a_summary_of_block_size_hardfork/ |