|
Title: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: gmaxwell on October 14, 2012, 11:54:19 PM Hi, this thread is created in response to the thread requesting 65 GH from the SC single.
Everyone knows that more is better, and since >9000 exahash is more than 65 GH (perhaps infinitely more) then it is clearly the best option. I think BFL should begin making these alterations to accommodate these speed increases with all haste. Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: Unacceptable on October 14, 2012, 11:56:59 PM Yeah,do it ASAP BFL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: Mushroomized on October 15, 2012, 12:01:38 AM Hi, this thread is created in response to the thread requesting 65 GH from the SC single. Everyone knows that more is better, and since >9000 exohash is more than 65 GH (perhaps infinitely more) then it is clearly the best option. I think BFL should begin making these alterations to accommodate these speed increases with all haste. Personally I think we can do better, 1 MILLION EXOHASHHH mmmmm /doctor evil Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: Starlightbreaker on October 15, 2012, 01:37:06 AM exa*
Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: elux on October 15, 2012, 01:50:01 AM Psssh. 9000 yoctohashes/s. 8)
Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: Morblias on October 15, 2012, 02:26:12 AM lol! yes, >9000 exohashs would be perfect. oh and they still need to meet the early november shipping date!
I talked to Doc Brown, he discussed how much power this device would need: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5cYgRnfFDA Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: HDSolar on October 15, 2012, 02:30:43 AM Too funny :D
Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: gmaxwell on October 15, 2012, 03:01:06 AM exa* No no, it's an external device... so it does exohashing, of course. Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: YokoToriyama on October 15, 2012, 05:14:47 AM no no no no no 1.21 gigawatts!!!!
Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: SysRun on October 15, 2012, 05:35:53 AM You know, the BFL logo is an infinity symbol, so why all the empty promises? As my hero and mentor says, "To infinity and beyond!"
Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: BurtW on October 15, 2012, 06:00:48 AM While we are at it I would like to propose that we start a petition to set the value of pi at 22/7.
We don't need a number that drones on and on and on and never repeats - what it the point in that? We can set it to a reasonable number we can all memorize by petition! Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: vitruvio on October 15, 2012, 08:18:16 AM My petition is create this Single of supermegaterapetahexaocto hashes/ nanosecond, but build only one, and gift it to me, I think is fair because I'm the more handsome of the forum. ::) Kisses Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: uuidman on October 15, 2012, 08:35:47 AM Whooha, this one was good.
Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: shwoop on October 15, 2012, 01:04:11 PM Hi, this thread is created in response to the thread requesting 65 GH from the SC single. Everyone knows that more is better, and since >9000 exahash is more than 65 GH (perhaps infinitely more) then it is clearly the best option. I think BFL should begin making these alterations to accommodate these speed increases with all haste. Post of the week. Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: cablepair on October 15, 2012, 03:40:08 PM epic. :)
Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: flynn on October 15, 2012, 05:43:46 PM 42
definitely 42 Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: BR0KK on October 15, 2012, 08:43:56 PM can someone make a website featuring a product that hashes at these speeds...... I'm shure that bfl will correct their "calculations" very fast to that speeds :)
Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: PuertoLibre on October 15, 2012, 11:13:18 PM Hi, this thread is created in response to the thread requesting 65 GH from the SC single. Everyone knows that more is better, and since >9000 exahash is more than 65 GH (perhaps infinitely more) then it is clearly the best option. I think BFL should begin making these alterations to accommodate these speed increases with all haste. can someone make a website featuring a product that hashes at these speeds...... I'm shure that bfl will correct their "calculations" very fast to that speeds :) Your prayers have been heard! http://i48.tinypic.com/2dwc7bn.jpg It will only require 3 fusion reactors at idle! Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: PuertoLibre on October 15, 2012, 11:19:44 PM BFL_Dave: Please process the next batch of LiteCoins at 9000ExaH/s.
Response: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEu4Iq5KL-Q BFL_Dave responds: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: bit_wizard on October 16, 2012, 03:43:03 PM http://i48.tinypic.com/2dwc7bn.jpg
I couldn't resist, I just pre ordered a Major Rig Sc!! Hopefully I'm in the first shipment. I only did it because I was able to find 3 fusion reactors off of the Silk Road. I'll show you 51%.... Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: gmaxwell on October 19, 2012, 01:45:51 PM Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: creativex on October 19, 2012, 04:44:26 PM 69 to 8, clearly the people have spoken! +1! ...literally...I just voted... Come on BFL UNLOCK THE POWAH! Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: cedivad on October 19, 2012, 05:12:17 PM UPGRADE THE FIRMWARE!!!!
hahahahhaa Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: BR0KK on October 19, 2012, 07:13:29 PM Their website is directly connected to the hashing speed firmware calculator:)
So they just have to update the statement for GH/s. voila a new examhash miner is born.... Uhhh what might happen when bitcoin becomes self aware?:/ Title: Re: Petition: BFL SC Single should be >9000 exahash and not 60Ghash Post by: PuertoLibre on October 20, 2012, 01:59:52 AM Their website is directly connected to the hashing speed firmware calculator:) http://techfact.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Skynet_logo.jpgSo they just have to update the statement for GH/s. voila a new examhash miner is born.... Uhhh what might happen when bitcoin becomes self aware?:/ http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/skynet-terminator.jpg Someone must stop BFL before it is too late. Someone contact D.A.R.P.A....quickly! http://www.darpa.mil/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA |
