|
Title: My trust. Post by: snailmen on September 26, 2015, 03:19:04 AM Resolved, thank you for understanding.
Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: Quickseller on September 26, 2015, 04:05:07 AM lol, blazr is not my alt. You are a scammer, and the more you post the more certain I am that you are candystripes ;)
Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: EthanB on September 26, 2015, 05:23:11 AM Sorry for clickbait. ::) lol well Quickseller's alt just gave me red trust because he's a dickhead who has low self-esteem. He linked an invalid scam report. Can someone explain why I am still marked a scammer when I am in fact not one at all? Trust is not moderated, due to certain implications.. So in a sense all trust is "allowed". Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: Lauda on September 26, 2015, 08:49:01 AM Looks like people keep requesting more drama and doing so in the wrong section. Have you even read the rules of the forum at all?
Quote 19. Possible (or real) scams and Trust ratings are not moderated (to prevent moderation abuse). In other words, I can leave you any rating that I want for any reason that I want. Trust is only moderated in very rare cases (e.g. hacks, a lot of abuse from a single person, etc.). In other words, there is no point in making this thread.Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: DiamondCardz on September 26, 2015, 12:02:17 PM /me sighs
This stuff is still going on? The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless. Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: redsn0w on September 26, 2015, 12:17:02 PM /me sighs This stuff is still going on? The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless. *Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos). Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: BurgerKill on September 26, 2015, 12:20:38 PM /me sighs This stuff is still going on? The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless. *Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos). The trust ratings were removed by theymos because he suspected that the account was compromised. I'll add the quote here. I suspect that Wardrick's account was compromised around May, though I'm not 100% sure. But I'm not hearing any evidence one way or another from anyone who previously owned the account, so I suppose the account will be locked for some time. Therefore, I removed Wardrick's recent sent trust ratings. He can rewrite them later if his account is ever restored. Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: DiamondCardz on September 26, 2015, 12:22:46 PM /me sighs This stuff is still going on? The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless. *Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos). Yep, I suppose so - a bit of a niche case though. I'm fairly certain Blazr hasn't been hacked, too ;) Nice signature, by the way. Reminds me of Shia LaBeouf. Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: redsn0w on September 26, 2015, 12:23:16 PM /me sighs This stuff is still going on? The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless. *Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos). The trust ratings were removed by theymos because he suspected that the account was compromised. I'll add the quote here. I suspect that Wardrick's account was compromised around May, though I'm not 100% sure. But I'm not hearing any evidence one way or another from anyone who previously owned the account, so I suppose the account will be locked for some time. Therefore, I removed Wardrick's recent sent trust ratings. He can rewrite them later if his account is ever restored. Thanks, I have passed that post. Nice signature, by the way. Reminds me of Shia LaBeouf. Thanks ;). Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: Brad Harrison on September 26, 2015, 02:39:56 PM Is the drama over yet folks?
Title: Re: IS THIS TRUST ALLOWED???? Post by: snailmen on September 26, 2015, 07:12:27 PM |