Bitcoin Forum

Other => Politics & Society => Topic started by: Rassah on December 12, 2012, 07:45:25 PM



Title: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Rassah on December 12, 2012, 07:45:25 PM
Created a disqus account, and it pulled my various posts from random blogs from years ago. Stumbled onto this "gem" I posted on a personal finance site, where I was arguing about monetary policy. Man, I'm blushing reading some of this

Quote
"Modern" economy is different from 30's and 40's economy due to drastically increased speed and globalization. Gold production could ALMOST keep up with economic expansion in the 30's without causing too much deflation. I don't think that is the case now (considering The Wizard of Oz, it doesn't seem like it was back then, either).
Inflation "forces" the economy to move. Businesses rush to continue to invest, expand, and create ways of turning their value-losing cash into more cash in order to outpace inflation. Customers rush to buy goods and services, or to invest in businesses, to make sure their money does not lose value either. Deflation would mean people would have an incentive to hold on to their cash and watch it grow, rather than spend it. Deflation also runs the risk of self-feeding stagnation: people hold onto their money instead of buying things, economy slows and available cash declines, cash increases in value even more, people have even more incentive to hold onto their cash instead of grow it, and on and on (until we have a cash bubble, like the tulip mania in Netherlands). Both runaway inflation and runaway deflation are bad, but I believe low 2% to 3% inflation is better and safer than 2% to 3% deflation, and has a way lower risk for making things go really bad.
Also, why specifically "gold" for a standard? Why not silver, platinum, or tulips? I don't believe gold can increase in quantity rapidly enough to keep up with our economic expansion, so it would lead to severe deflation. Fiat currency allows us to more or less control inflationary and deflationary forces (start or stop the printers, so to speak). We can't control the amount of gold in mines. Also since we are globalized, and can easily buy other types of commodities or currencies, why even a "standard?" If you are worried about USD, you can buy precious metal ETFs, stocks, or even Euros/Yen. As I see it, due to much more globalized economy, extremely fast speed of transactions, and with way fewer barriers, we already have a somewhat free market for currency, one that competes against other forms of currency and valuables. The only barrier left is free immigration: we can't easily escape taxes by moving to another country.
-- Rassah  (3 years ago)


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Rassah on December 12, 2012, 07:56:14 PM
And some more embarrassing naivete from same discussion

Quote
Regarding the main point, gold; the reason gold standard really bothers me is because I feel it would be way too similar to last year's oil spike: people hoard it, driving the cost of it up artificially. At least oil is renewable; gold is not quite as much. If gold were the currency standard, people hoarding gold would make its value go up. Food would cost less and less gold comparatively. That's deflation. Should the bubble pop, or another type of currency enter the market, the gold, having almost no utility value, would crash, and food would cost more and more gold. Inflation. We would essentially be in a perpetual cycle, driven by people not smart enough to realize what they're doing. Am I incorrect in understanding this? Also, our economy, and our population, has expanded exponentially in the last few decades. With a limited supply of gold, we would have less and less gold per person. Scarcity would again lead to deflation (price of money/gold going up). Even with banks using low reserve rates and re-loaning the money, I can't see something like gold growing fast enough to support this, can you?


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: myrkul on December 12, 2012, 08:55:40 PM
A ray - slim though it might be - of hope for some of this forum's participants, then... :)


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Lethn on December 12, 2012, 09:01:45 PM
Happens to all of us, I almost thought about joining the army when I was younger, definitely would have ended up losing it and shooting a superior officer.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: firefop on December 12, 2012, 09:21:34 PM
I think this post deserves my two favorite Churchill quotes.

“Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.”

&

“If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain.”


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Rassah on December 12, 2012, 09:47:54 PM
“If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain.”

That last one really needs to be qualified, and specifically mean fiscal conservative. A lot of older people are social conservatives, and that's always bad. And actually, the word conservative in there isn't even right, either. I know it's a colloquial meaning of conservative, i.e. "thinking about economics from the right political position," but conservative really just means resistance to change, and fear of trying something new, even in the face of conflicting evidence. In that sense, Comunist USSR was extremely conservative, both socially and economically, Democrats are mildly conservative, wishing to preserve the status-quo of the current tax rates and entitlement programs, but being somewhat lenient on social issues, and libertarianism is extremely liberal in all senses.
So, if you don't mind, since I came from the liberal, Democratic, immigrant, same-sex left, I'll continue to have disdain for anything conservative  ;D


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Anon136 on December 12, 2012, 10:37:37 PM
i think you made some good points. Gold really isnt a great money from a technical standpoint. it would likely be deflationary and this would likely lead to hording which would hamper economic growth. Similarly inflationary money also leads different but no less real forms of malinvestment. Ideally we would have a money that was responsibly managed in order to maintain a stable purchasing power. Probably a currency that was issued privately and redeemable for a basket of commodities would be most ideal.

Of course what is great about gold as money is the protection it provides against the damage that would be caused by government meddling (damage that is typically orders of magnitude greater than a little naturally occurring deflation)


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: myrkul on December 12, 2012, 10:59:10 PM
i think you made some good points. Gold really isnt a great money from a technical standpoint. it would likely be deflationary and this would likely lead to hording which would hamper economic growth.
Gold has a historical record of increasing supply roughly equal to population growth. There have been some blips, but roughly speaking, gold has held it's value pretty steady since well before that long-haired hippy started preaching against the moneylenders on the temple steps.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Rassah on December 12, 2012, 11:32:47 PM
i think you made some good points. Gold really isnt a great money from a technical standpoint. it would likely be deflationary and this would likely lead to hording which would hamper economic growth.
Gold has a historical record of increasing supply roughly equal to population growth. There have been some blips, but roughly speaking, gold has held it's value pretty steady since well before that long-haired hippy started preaching against the moneylenders on the temple steps.

Is THAT why long-term investment in gold yields something like 3% return?


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: myrkul on December 12, 2012, 11:37:22 PM
i think you made some good points. Gold really isnt a great money from a technical standpoint. it would likely be deflationary and this would likely lead to hording which would hamper economic growth.
Gold has a historical record of increasing supply roughly equal to population growth. There have been some blips, but roughly speaking, gold has held it's value pretty steady since well before that long-haired hippy started preaching against the moneylenders on the temple steps.

Is THAT why long-term investment in gold yields something like 3% return?
Is that inflation adjusted? ;) Often ROI is measured in the currency units that you bought it in, and if you inflate the purchasing power of the dollar away, the same amount of gold is going to buy a lot more dollars.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: niko on December 12, 2012, 11:42:27 PM
In some ways, only a fool never change their opinion. I may be one: since ~2000, I take the "political compass" test once every 3-4 years. My coordinates have not moved significantly: I'm right there, in the libertarian-left corner, with Nader, Walt Brown, Mandela, the Dalai Lama, Gandhi (even though I'd never endorse most of them).


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Rassah on December 12, 2012, 11:52:13 PM
i think you made some good points. Gold really isnt a great money from a technical standpoint. it would likely be deflationary and this would likely lead to hording which would hamper economic growth.
Gold has a historical record of increasing supply roughly equal to population growth. There have been some blips, but roughly speaking, gold has held it's value pretty steady since well before that long-haired hippy started preaching against the moneylenders on the temple steps.

Is THAT why long-term investment in gold yields something like 3% return?
Is that inflation adjusted? ;)

Apparently.. yes.
"Since 1900 to 2011 bullion made real returns of only 1.3% a year..."
Real returns - returns adjusted for changes in prices due to inflation or other external effects


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: myrkul on December 13, 2012, 12:09:23 AM
i think you made some good points. Gold really isnt a great money from a technical standpoint. it would likely be deflationary and this would likely lead to hording which would hamper economic growth.
Gold has a historical record of increasing supply roughly equal to population growth. There have been some blips, but roughly speaking, gold has held it's value pretty steady since well before that long-haired hippy started preaching against the moneylenders on the temple steps.

Is THAT why long-term investment in gold yields something like 3% return?
Is that inflation adjusted? ;)

Apparently.. yes.
"Since 1900 to 2011 bullion made real returns of only 1.3% a year..."
Real returns - returns adjusted for changes in prices due to inflation or other external effects
yup... steady. Maybe a little up, maybe a little down, that's what you want in a currency. Just like bitcoin. It will inflate to a set number, hopefully at a rate close to adoption, and then slowly trickle away as people lose wallets. Eventually, we may need a Bitcoin 2.0, but I'll be long dead (or uploaded) by then.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Topazan on December 13, 2012, 01:41:11 AM
Quote
A ray - slim though it might be - of hope for some of this forum's participants, then...  :)
Makes me curious what you used to believe.  :)

From what I understand, money is neutral in the long term.  I personally suspect that short term effects would be limited if we allowed currency competition.  Let people choose what kind of currency they use.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: myrkul on December 13, 2012, 02:16:15 AM
Quote
A ray - slim though it might be - of hope for some of this forum's participants, then...  :)
Makes me curious what you used to believe.  :)

A brief summary:
I've wandered all over the political spectrum, from "rebellious" anarchism (the teenaged, unfocused, fuck the system type) to card-carrying democrat (voted for Clinton both times), to Ron Paul Republican, to minarchist libertarian, and finally, to AnCap.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Rassah on December 13, 2012, 02:36:02 AM
Quote
A ray - slim though it might be - of hope for some of this forum's participants, then...  :)
Makes me curious what you used to believe.  :)

A brief summary:
I've wandered all over the political spectrum, from "rebellious" anarchism (the teenaged, unfocused, fuck the system type) to card-carrying democrat (voted for Clinton both times), to Ron Paul Republican, to minarchist libertarian, and finally, to AnCap.

I was under the impression you were not from US


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: myrkul on December 13, 2012, 02:42:23 AM
Quote
A ray - slim though it might be - of hope for some of this forum's participants, then...  :)
Makes me curious what you used to believe.  :)

A brief summary:
I've wandered all over the political spectrum, from "rebellious" anarchism (the teenaged, unfocused, fuck the system type) to card-carrying democrat (voted for Clinton both times), to Ron Paul Republican, to minarchist libertarian, and finally, to AnCap.

I was under the impression you were not from US
Born and raised. I throw in the occasional over-seas phrase or word to keep people on their toes.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Anon136 on December 13, 2012, 11:30:51 AM
Quote
A ray - slim though it might be - of hope for some of this forum's participants, then...  :)
Makes me curious what you used to believe.  :)

A brief summary:
I've wandered all over the political spectrum, from "rebellious" anarchism (the teenaged, unfocused, fuck the system type) to card-carrying democrat (voted for Clinton both times), to Ron Paul Republican, to minarchist libertarian, and finally, to AnCap.

Have you ever heard of someone who used to consider themselves a free market anarchist but has since moved on? I find it interesting and perhaps telling that it is easy to find someone who used to consider themselves a communist or used to consider themselves a republican but i have never yet met someone who used to be a market anarchist.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: myrkul on December 13, 2012, 05:28:17 PM
Quote
A ray - slim though it might be - of hope for some of this forum's participants, then...  :)
Makes me curious what you used to believe.  :)

A brief summary:
I've wandered all over the political spectrum, from "rebellious" anarchism (the teenaged, unfocused, fuck the system type) to card-carrying democrat (voted for Clinton both times), to Ron Paul Republican, to minarchist libertarian, and finally, to AnCap.

Have you ever heard of someone who used to consider themselves a free market anarchist but has since moved on? I find it interesting and perhaps telling that it is easy to find someone who used to consider themselves a communist or used to consider themselves a republican but i have never yet met someone who used to be a market anarchist.

I believe there's one person I've met (on here, of course) who claims to have turned away from libertarianism before reaching free market anarchist (recoiled from personal responsibility, I think), but one you go AnCap, you don't go back. ;)


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: firefop on December 14, 2012, 04:54:02 AM
I believe there's one person I've met (on here, of course) who claims to have turned away from libertarianism before reaching free market anarchist (recoiled from personal responsibility, I think), but one you go AnCap, you don't go back. ;)

I'm not opposed to the idea of it... but nobody's been able to sell it to me yet. But I'm not really that far off of it.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Lethn on December 14, 2012, 08:34:02 AM
Quote
Ron Paul Republican

Republican? You do realise he got booed at one of the Republican GOP right? That was when he said to not go to war with Iran.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfBKKh0C2eo


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Kluge on December 14, 2012, 09:02:12 AM
Quote
Ron Paul Republican

Republican? You do realise he got booed at one of the Republican GOP right? That was when he said to not go to war with Iran.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfBKKh0C2eo
That doesn't mean he doesn't run as a Republican, though, and to be nominated (for most states), supporters need to register as Republican. Thus, registered Republican, Ron Paul supporter -- Ron Paul Republican. It generally was (is?) held by Ron Paul supporters that the Republican party is the most likely vessel to allow a Paul-like candidate to ascend to presidency (among other potential political victories). There are "Ron Paul Democrats," too, though. The failed candidacy of Bob Conley comes to mind. I'm not sure what "Ron Paul Republican" would imply over "Ron Paul supporter," though... Maybe the person gives enough of a damn to vote, or is more "Rand Paul" in thinking, or is just affirming they believe using the Republican party is most likely to result in tangible change...? Maybe they're just worried they might be associated with the Libertarian party.  :D


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: myrkul on December 14, 2012, 09:45:37 AM
I believe there's one person I've met (on here, of course) who claims to have turned away from libertarianism before reaching free market anarchist (recoiled from personal responsibility, I think), but once you go AnCap, you don't go back. ;)

I'm not opposed to the idea of it... but nobody's been able to sell it to me yet. But I'm not really that far off of it.


You do realize that this will sound like a challenge to me, right? ;)

Well, Challenge accepted. What are your main complaints?

Maybe the person gives enough of a damn to vote...
This. The last time I voted was for Ron Paul, and I had to register Republican in order to do so.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Rudd-O on December 14, 2012, 10:00:26 AM
Once you see the irrationality, the violence and the hostility in statists, it is impossible to unsee it.  This is exactly why one does not return from an cap.

I imagine abolitionists also could not stop seeing the Negro as a human being, once they did.


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Rassah on December 14, 2012, 05:41:05 PM
Once you see the irrationality, the violence and the hostility in statists, it is impossible to unsee it.  This is exactly why one does not return from an cap.

I imagine abolitionists also could not stop seeing the Negro as a human being, once they did.

Ditto for anyone who was a Christian/Muslim who turns atheist. You just can't *force* yourself to believe in Santa Claus


Title: Re: People and opinions do change (me 3 years ago)
Post by: Rudd-O on December 14, 2012, 07:59:25 PM
Once you see the irrationality, the violence and the hostility in statists, it is impossible to unsee it.  This is exactly why one does not return from an cap.

I imagine abolitionists also could not stop seeing the Negro as a human being, once they did.

Ditto for anyone who was a Christian/Muslim who turns atheist. You can't can't *force* yourself to believe in Santa Claus

Yup.