Bitcoin Forum

I am a behavioural economics hobbyist doing a few experiments. I need to collect some data.

Here is how (Please read everything before starting):

1. Go to http://www.veniaminilmer.com/timerationality/test
2. Answer the simple question there.
3. When you click submit it gives you a message 'Here is your code:' copy that code.
4. Paste that code and your wallet address here.
5. I will send over 0.01 BTC.

Note that everyone who posts a valid code here will only be counted once. If you post more than one code, you will still only be counted once.
I will continue to send over bitcoins to people until 2 PM EST / 7 PM GMT today. That is in about 1 hour.

So get some bitcoins while you have the chance!

15417e4eafec173f414a744db47473ce
1BGmwpBoRNawZpfQibZLvt2bVASPCuNkj5

Here is my code: 5d8e352e62e0dfcc13169b230aba4d39

Wallet: 12ozZFVw3UKEymiq3RDmrVBfnYvYPk2g6K

Cheres

8953bed4abd5fd3d675a2a34a0e6dbea
19rpovWuesS8N5Ky3jf6HQ9jy2c9MLZ6ZT

Sent to Benson Samuel, Luno, and cptmooseinc.

Nice idea. Good luck! :)
Here is your code: c8e6ee870ec4121cf173726fe0e0d3c9

btc:
12UjxfhegP9rDfEL4JPJ9D5R3Ea12C9c45

How many forum members should reply here?

f9a2e45d144ff81dc729f4cf1d671dca
1Moshi7BMtBtBefWSnhUXcWoc8WEhpgNxs


Neat little experiment here. I remember you had put up a similar (identical?) test about a month back; what's this for, exactly?

Thank You.

code: 1308c17a9b2e22a7960de624481f20a0
1KvmSszUCjCVa9BMAbeSNpsvJ3gCnZviEW

Thanks ;)

code: e5cbf60f717f1d2763ab4118d90fe0b0

wallet: 12g7sLVT4zY8HYKD7TChPQt3L4zftGAkgj

thanks in advance!

Here is my code: a45d388077ffe98967acd2ba19be1373

Here is my wallet address: 1M34TvZ1m5MnCzuzngVuBikeFeGadqYC4F

Code: af1f3d1f5e9aacede7c0be73af4e3f72

BTC: 16ocxdB6V3Ve4AdxgU2fJgXTJAPJ7yY5GJ


Neat question : )

Code: b71093ec817720d862bd58960216d96d

Address: 17QYNmB29dK3SvGUZ6fCs2bEc29sAsVU3B

Thanks man

Sent to Maciek, Moshi, wev, juggalodarkclow, D1R1, dresdenreader, and Driice.

Maciek, any amount of forum members can reply here as long as they get in within the hour.

Moshi, you are right, I did something similar before. I don't believe I have enough data and so I'm trying to get some more with this round. I am planning to have a chart that would eventually approximately fit a function. Already you can tell that the personal preference is usually more cautious than the "Most People" perception.

It's based on a video in the link here - http://www.veniaminilmer.com/timerationality

I believe that behavioural economics is one of the least well know subjects to have been touched by science, and I believe I am barely scratching the surface with this stuff.

Payment received! Thanks!

fc20685fd07bbcc21d9d4c973ee7729e

1CasperDEhyGD81WNPo9qkaFnWxUSWmrqk

Sent to 001sonkit.

hmm ok why not

490dff54ec7b138340453e6a00be9cd5
16rU5CwWb713ank7a9W4RiidWxZWaTxWSM

Eh, Why not
92cf2ae2e6d2e636e1d2b78cd78d8010
BTC address is in my signature

259151e389938f77a700871e734c0b4a

Did it out of curiosity. Good luck with your research.

First: recieved the transaction. Thanks, mate.

Second, this might not be heavily into my field of interest, but I'd imagine that, since this is psychological nonsense, you might not want to publish your expected results (in this case, the relation of the two lines to approximate a function) before you publish the actual results. That could easily cause your audience to subconsciously or intentionally skew the results in a certain direction. That, and I'd imagine you're getting these results from somewhere other than this forum: this place is full of relatively like-minded individuals, and in general the Bitcoin community is likely much closer (but not quite  ;D) to masters of probability in comparison to the general public, and that could also skew your results if you're hoping your subjects will take the offerings at face value and not heavily compare them.

Wishing you luck, mate; I'd like to see your results when you're finished, if possible.

Sent to camolist and JackRabiit.
Thank you for your interest Matthew N. Wright.

Moshi, I understand the risks of publicly displaying the information before it is "finished".
I believe in open information even in development as it could spread ideas. Just like open source projects are "open" even under development.
This is not the only location where I am getting results from. If you are interested in further results, feel free to spread the test to your friends.

7059ddfff33b8eff60eb04328f65bd81
1EvE8haMoWwet521GZLZTbv8hqQobEEwRD

I can't fault you for your methods and ideals, especially if they work.

I won't agree with the analogy with open-source projects, however: the biggest downsides I could think of for releasing a program's source while under development are plagiarism - an issue no matter when the source is released - and injection - that is, taking a docile application (say, Electrum) and dropping a payload into it, easier than would be possible without the source. The former is a non-issue in this case for aforementioned reasons, and the latter can be circumvented by simply compiling from the original, untainted source rather than using any pre-compiled applications.

Here, releasing information about the test that isn't necessary cannot easily be redacted. However, the analogy is just that: an analogy, and one that isn't meant to be spotless, and I'm just nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking.

Sent to peepee.

Sent to gweedo.

pinger, the bitcoin address is listed as the hash code..

Code: 27823d93572281ff901defe7f04067bb
Address: 1L6miPi3h8xCLPCkcekCLHU3eWxJ93jp1B

Sent to xidram.

The hour has come, so the hash will not appear any more.
Thank you everyone for participating.