|
Title: [WANTED] Post by: alphahacktivist on March 25, 2016, 07:38:02 AM xx
Title: Re: [WANTED] Post by: sunniechance3 on March 25, 2016, 08:49:41 AM that sounds pretty good as long as it doesn't take the accounting dep.forever process transactions like the damn btc casino lol
Title: Re: [WANTED] Post by: merelcoin on March 25, 2016, 08:56:48 AM Sounds rather impossible to me, or i must be missing something.
How can you have 1 deposit address, but credit individuals who each deposit coins to this address? The only ways i can think of are: making the individuals sign a message with the address they used to deposit the coins (so everybody using a webwallet will have problems) OR forcing the individuals to divulge the address which they'll use to deposit coins beforehand (and only credit coins to an account when one of the input addresses is an address that was pre-divulged). Title: Re: [WANTED] Post by: getmoremonline on March 25, 2016, 09:17:51 AM This is a very interesting project, if you find someone please let me know, I have a similar project and need a programmer.
Title: Re: [WANTED] Post by: krunox123 on March 25, 2016, 09:47:54 AM Sounds rather impossible to me, or i must be missing something. It's 2016, and nothing is impossible.How can you have 1 deposit address, but credit individuals who each deposit coins to this address? The only ways i can think of are: making the individuals sign a message with the address they used to deposit the coins (so everybody using a webwallet will have problems) OR forcing the individuals to divulge the address which they'll use to deposit coins beforehand (and only credit coins to an account when one of the input addresses is an address that was pre-divulged). But, yes, it is impossible for a marketplace to only has one deposit address unless everyone is using the same account or, at least, have something like "Which Bitcoin address you will use to deposit your funds". But, I think what he meant was each account will have single deposit address. Title: Re: [WANTED] Post by: alphahacktivist on March 25, 2016, 10:09:25 AM xx
Title: Re: [WANTED] Post by: alphahacktivist on April 14, 2016, 04:18:41 PM xx
Title: Re: [WANTED] Post by: merelcoin on April 15, 2016, 06:28:30 AM nearly done with this :) till now the impossible has been made possible. totally possible. I'm curious as how you did this, technically, since using only 1 address for all accounts (compared to 1 address per user) seemed rather impossible to me (unless you apply different charges for every user, or force your users to sign messages with the sending address... both being a rather big hassle) Title: Re: [WANTED] Post by: alphahacktivist on April 15, 2016, 08:53:19 AM xx
Title: Re: [WANTED] Post by: alphahacktivist on April 19, 2016, 09:00:36 AM xx
|