Bitcoin Forum

Ive made my decision as far as whether or not to pay this user for his posting in the bitsupra signature campaign but dependent upon some community input my mind might change.

Ok lets give everyone the story first of all. User Kepler510 enrolled in the bitsupra campaign and has been posting borderline spammy posts since joining. Prior to todays payout schedule another user posted in the thread calling this man out. I read so many posts that this didnt catch my eye right away. Also the posts werent the same day in most cases nor the same threads.


Now after seeing this i decided that Kepler was gone from the campaign. I immediately sent him a message to remove his signature and move on. What these signature wearers dont realize or dont care about is they represent a company when they join the campaign. Theyre paid to do a job. That job doesnt mean go post bullshit and be paid. Post like you would normally and make a few dollars a week. Its common sense not to post like a tard but they dont get it.

In the official rules of the campaign it doesnt state anything about posting dbl posting but ive seen users complaining in here that their acct was banned for such actions. Id like to hear some feedback on this issue if i could, for future reference

I don't see why this is even a question. Signature campaign spammer deserves to be banned (especially in obvious cases of spam). Simple as that.

Signature campaign managers don't look into every single post of the participants in great detail. It's good that people like you are on the lookout for such things because same things goes for staff. Report such posts and posters like this will most likely be banned.

I've PMed Cyrus earlier about this user.
If your rules don't cover that sort of signature spam (or any spam at all), I'd suggest reworking those rules.
No, he doesn't deserve to be paid (take that from a fellow campaign manager).
If it was up to me, he'd take a longer pause off that forum.

---

Some do.

Fun fact: Yahoo is a signature campaign manager.
However, someone else made them aware of that user.

Obviously im in total agreement with you but by writing this thread i accomplish 2 things. 1 i get confirmation of my own feelings and 2 i bring this user to staffs attention

Sure, remove this dude. Obvious spamming is obvious.
Although if I where you I would give him the credits.
To avoid any scam accusation or bitching about not being paid from this guy.
Do as You please, its your stuff, those few posts wont bankrupt your campaign
and who knows, if this guy notices that we have some nice people in here, maybe
he will change his spammy attitude? I think its worth a try.  

Haha love the fun fact. Its true though btcforjoe brought this to my attention. This user spread his replies out over the course of 3 days so i didnt catch it.

Not sure what you're trying to say here; we should go easy on him? If so, the answer is no. A spammer is a spammer.

You don't need to create a new thread for each particular user. Usually it is best to gather examples of spam and PM a moderator directly.

The good thing is that this user did not use 2 accounts on your campaign as what he did on his previous signature campaign luckybtccasino.

O, now that's just terrible...
As to new circumstances I'm withdrawing from my previous statement.
No favourable tariff for scammers and spammers, period.
Guess I'm to soft :) and trusting.

If you don't want someone that wouldn't stop bugging you in your life then pay that user. But if you can deal with it then don't pay that user. I don't think users like that should be paid for Signature Campaign. His/her only intention is to go here and post some things and then leave when he/she reaches the quota.

hey i just picked up my pitchfork lets burn the witch!

http://cdn.meme.am/instances/50093408.jpg


dont pay him for crap posts. will just engage others to do the same, because if the get kicked the will still get paid.

Absolutely not, if you pay the user, this will encourage other users to do the same thing.

You enact the advertisers not to good, simply because the problems that actually you don't know its origin, you immediately decided that I am guilty. It's not fair to me and I hope anyone can give feedback to me. Due to the fact I don't do spammers but I did an affirmation in my words and my goal was only  affirmation + no goal quite some of it. I admit it I was guilty and I am willing to remove all postings that are considered as a spammer and my future are more careful in doing the posting, because I also want to harm anyone. I only help those who want to introduce their products (advertising) to everyone. But if I unfairly treated like this I think that you are not professional and you just listen to the words of a person who do not know for sure the problem I was having..!!! . In the Rules you write also not recorded that they are kicked from the sign campaign will not be paid. I Need Justice! .

Now my name is already contaminated and you have to be responsible for this, if not I'll do enough replies from what you're doing or it could just be me doing things that are not going to want on your website!!!!

 >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

Did you seriously just threaten the person you want to have mercy with you and pay you?

It's always a huge giveaway when a user can barely speak English one post then significantly improves the next:



Banned.

hilariousandco has spoken ;D

Nobody is ever going to get away with posting like that for long. I don't see the point in even trying, it's always going to get clamped down on eventually.

Why risk losing your account?

The biggest issue is these guys can go join another signature instantly, so they have multiple strikes. Once they become higher ranked more signatures open up for them.
If there was a master list for signature runners to check, it would cut a ton of spam. Sold accounts would also lose value if they where kicked from a campaign. Mention that because a lot of the spam is from guys with ten plus accounts.

They just need to read the post history to know someone is posting the same thing over and over again or just generally bad. The last few pages should be enough.

Yobit is automatic and I find most kicked from this campaign end up in one of two other campaigns that do no background check. Bitmixer was one and the other one has a small signature that I always forget. Just think if there was a list they could run through each day for new members and flag those that where booted from another campaign. It would allow campaign managers to really narrow their field of work on top of the current scripts that check members post quality.

I know one guy that is yobit that farms accounts like crazy because they tend to post before his main account or right after. If you got him alone you would see a difference but its hard to make the connection besides the posts being garbage or repetitive.

Number one question coming from new accounts tends to be where can I get signature and then they are off to the races asking questions that have been asked a million times.

Making it harder to jump from campaign to campaign would kill the spam and its well known that accounts post well for 20-40 posts before joining a new campaign that may look at quality. Twigged to this after clicking on yobits monthly "theres the door" list and sudden improvement from guys that posted no more than 3-8 word responses.

It would mean that the lazy managers can stay lazy while others do the work for them.


Campaign managers doing their job from the start would also kill spam. Dont accept newbies, they have no post history. Everyone else gets a history check before getting accepted. Repeatedly check again with each payment. This is pretty common with most campaigns, its just a few that dont bother or dont care enough.