Bitcoin Forum

problem solved
moderator, lock it please

Trust is not moderated.

I was under the impression that luptin isn't giving negative trust for ponzi supporters anymore. I think it is strange that he abruptly stopped then randomly started back up again.

Anyway, you should try to discuss the issue with Luptin, if you two are unwilling to work something out to your liking then you should contact Blazed who is the reason why Luptin is in the DefaultTrust network.

some of us have a life which means we can not play kindergardner 24/7 on btct ;)

Looks like he added negative feedback for promoting a scam disguised as cloud mining.

I know this is going to sound like a stupid question, but did anyone message the OP with something along the lines of "hey I think the site you are advertising in your signature is a scam, I would recommend that you remove  your signature"?

In my experience, the above is very effective as most people do not want to advertise businesses that are a scam.

From the looks of it, the OP has since removed his signature.

For sure no one sent a message for me .
Now I removed my signature and sent a message for lutpin but he didn't reply
I hope he will be here

PM user Blazed about the issue, I dont know why Lutpin leaves these ratings without any proof

It has been rumored that he can look into the future to see what site turns into a scam, just pm blazed about the matter

Trust is not moderated, moderators can't do anything toward your trust rating. You simply have to negotiate with Luptin.


P.S, Just because a site is paying doesn't mean it's not a scam. It depends on how it operates. If it operates through the means of a ponzi scheme (paying earlier investors with the new investor's investment), that's what makes it illegal/scam.


Savage.

You don't know the difference between invaluable and invalid, so you don't need to be in a signature campaign spamming retarded crap everywhere.   

But you're right.  It's not against the rules, so why are you getting punished?  Welcome to bitcointalk.  Then again just because you got payments doesn't prove jack shit.  Ponzis all pay off in the beginning.   Derp.

What can I do if he didn't reply my message
 

The only two things that you can usually do is:
1) Resolve the problem with the person who left you the rating.
2) Contact the person in Depth 1 who has added the person, that left you the rating, to their trust list.

You've waited an awesome hour after messaging me, I'm not online as much these days.

---

3) Be a little patient and wait.

---

It's Lutpin, nice to meet you.

---

There's a difference between the scum quality users that advertise discuss ponzi schemes Investor-based games in their own hellhole subforum
And those who advertise them in their signature, displayed under each and every post, regardless of the section they post in.


Word, however, for a discussion you need two parties.
What doesn't work is shooting me a message, waiting an hour, and then creating a thread saying 'doesn't reply to my messages'.

After I sent you a message yesterday , I noticed your last active and I am sure you read my message then I created my thread.
in any case I have read other member threads about your negative trust and seems there is no useless from discussion with you. thank you
I wondere why moderators permit to person like Lutpin to hustle members in this forum .
I can't believe that I had negative trust just for using referral link in my signature.

Last active means nothing. And nope, I had not read your message when you created that thread.

Oh yeah, all those threads with people crying, where did they go again?

You're right, I'm the problem this forum has.

Oh wait, I'm not. People like you are.

The problem wasn't that it was a ref, but you wouldn't understand.
Go run to YoBit and earn your share.

Well I think that's the problem, he can't join a sig campaign with neg trust.  Or maybe Yobit accepts red lettered asses, but as I said previously OP shouldn't be getting paid for his garbage posting--because that's what it's going to end up being.

Edit:  Ok Lutpin changed it, did not know that.  Got it.

OP doesn't have (default trusted) negative trust anymore.

---

Like when rushing to join a signature campaign in order to earn the maximum from your time here? ::)

There's always this but in certain conditions time is of the essence.

---

---

OP since this appears to be solved, please consider locking this thread.

Well then, with me and Lutpin being significantly less active these days, I can already see another shitpost arguing we are alts.

Having an opinion that puts you in a negative light and/or one that you do not agree with is not necessarily "shit-posting"

Why not?
Is it just a coincidence that you 2 are suddenly less active here (at the same time)?