Bitcoin Forum

A recent investigative series has shown that not only are there states with highly hackable voting machines, but Hillary Clinton tends to do better in counties with said machines. Sure, it may seem like a coincidence, but Lee explains that not only is Hillary outperforming Bernie in these counties, but she's even crushing her own projections! Dubious indeed. This and more on Redacted Tonight.

....:the economy is rigged and designed to shaft the average American, and buying into the system is only making it worse.

There is a great realignment going on, say what they will.

Mad About Rigged Elections? Mainstream Media Says "You" Are The Problem

by Claire Bernish

Mainstream headlines constantly decry Bernie Sanders supporters for disrupting events in outrage, as if their protests and demonstrations somehow illustrate the devolution of the elections. But that focus by the corporate media utterly negates the consistent and continual reports of fraud and disenfranchisement fueling their ire.

And it's getting ridiculous.

Newsweek, though far from alone, offered a prime example of the obfuscation of the election fraud and questionable campaign tactics by Hillary Clinton in its skewering of Sanders' supporters.

"Get Control, Senator Sanders, or Get Out, (http://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-get-control-get-out-race-461195)" Newsweek's Kurt Eichenwald titled his op-ed — which thoroughly blasts the Vermont senator — as if he were somehow responsible for both the electoral chaos and the actions of an irate voting public.

"So, Senator Sanders," Eichenwald writes [with emphasis added], "either get control of what is becoming your increasingly unhinged cult, or get out of the race. Whatever respect sane liberals had for you is rapidly dwindling, and the damage being inflicted on your reputation may be unfixable. If you can't even manage the vicious thugs who act in your name, you can't be trusted to run a convenience store, much less the country."

Really?

Certainly there's fertile ground for those seeking parallels between the main protagonists of this quintessential political soap opera, and our more flesh and blood "heroes." Like their imaginary foils, the Clintons' moral compass is functionally impaired, so much so one suspects the HoC scriptwriters modeled their lead characters on the Democratic Party's resident "royal couple."

To be sure, a critical assessment of Hillary Clinton's fitness for the Oval Office can't be undertaken absent some reference to the respective roles she and her husband have played in each other's professional lives. Many folks will recall their indelible slogan from Bill Clinton's successful tilt at the top job in 1992, where the campaign pitch to voters was, "Two for the price of one."

Again, one not unlike the mantra the Underwoods might concoct for voters. One wonders why the Clintons have not retooled that hoary old refrain for 2016, and here I'm thinking, "Buy one, get one free" might fit the bill.

Last year, the United States spent more than $596 billion (http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex_database) on the military, a total greater than the next six countries in the world combined. But the Republican-controlled Congress is looking to increase that number for next year.

On Wednesday, the House passed its version (https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4909) of the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), allowing for $602 billion to be spent on the country's defense in 2017, but the way the money is budgeted could mean that total military spending could actually end up being far higher.

Under the bill, $18 billion would be moved from the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), which is currently used primarily to fund operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, to the general budget to be used for additional troops and equipment. As Politico reported (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/house-passes-sweeping-defense-policy-bill-223349), this would likely leave enough money for such operations only through April, forcing the next president to request additional funding. Thus, the House bill would effectively increase the total military expenditure for next year.

With no other primary candidates to oppose him and the Republican Party rapidly falling into line, Donald Trump is soaring in national polls, while Hillary Clinton's double-digit lead has evaporated in the space of a month. On Sunday, the presumptive G.O.P. nominee passed Clinton for the first time in a weekly average of head-to-head polls (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html), edging the former secretary of state by 0.2 points—a virtual dead heat that is the result of an undeniable and dramatic shift in recent days. Of the last five polls released since Wednesday, three show Trump in the lead: Fox News has the billionaire winning by 45-42; Rasmussen shows him up 42-37; and the latest ABC News/Washington Post survey leans toward Trump by a 46-44 margin.

A "Trump Bump" (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-poll-surge-223419) among Republicans is not surprising. Despite pockets of resistance among many conservative intellectuals, ashen-faced party leaders are predictably swallowing their pride and embracing the front-runner—even if, like Lindsey Graham, they are too embarrassed (http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/22/politics/donald-trump-lindsey-graham-republican-party/) to endorse Trump in public. House Speaker Paul Ryan may still be sputtering, but the rank-and-file are already looking ahead to the general election.

Clinton, meanwhile, is growing more unpopular by the minute as she faces an unexpected eleventh-hour rally by Sanders. Last month, in the wake of a Super Tuesday shellacking, the Vermont senator indicated (http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/04/bernie-sanders-campaign-future) he would be dialing back his attacks on the Democratic front-runner to run an "issue-oriented" campaign. But the cease-fire came to an abrupt end last weekend, when Sanders's supporters revolted at the Nevada state convention, reportedly throwing chairs and hurling insults (http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/05/bernie-sanders-becoming-2016-ralph-nader) at Democratic officials they accused of tilting the scales for Hillary. Sanders barely apologized, inveighing against the D.N.C. and terrifying party leaders with his newly belligerent tone. Despite the fact that it is practically impossible for the Vermont senator to catch up Clinton, Democrats are now grappling with the prospect of an ugly, drawn-out fight that could roil their own convention in July.

Fighting a two front war, with Sanders to her left and Trump to her right, Clinton's unfavorables have risen steadily (http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/hillary-clinton-favorable-rating/edit#!minpct=10&maxpct=70&mindate=2014-01-01&maxdate=2016-05-23&smoothing=moderate&showpoints=yes&showsplines=yes&hiddenpollsters=&hiddensubpops=&partisanship=S,P,N&parties=D,R,I,N&selected=favorable,unfavorable&fudge=1), reaching a new high in the last week. According to Gallup polling, Clinton is now as disliked by Democrats (29 percent unfavorable) and Trump is unpopular with Republicans (30 percent unfavorable). "If you look at the favorability ratings of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, both of them have very, very high unfavorables," Sanders said in an interview Sunday (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/sanders-clinton-two-evils-223449#ixzz49UZYUWOj), characterizing the choice as Americans being forced to pick between the lesser of two evils. "If you look at virtually all of the polls done in the last six, seven weeks, in every one of them, nationally polls and statewide polls, we defeat Trump by larger margins—in some cases, significantly larger margins—than does Secretary Clinton," he continued.

There has never been another movie like it. The accurate portrayal of the threats to America are so stunningly detailed and accurate that even the most aware of current events will be shocked as to the totality of the revelations.


The backdrop of the movie is situated among an increasingly angry citizenry at home, while America is being turned into a corporation, a corporation primed for a hostile takeover.

The antagonist in the movie is the United Nations, from which the movie makes clear is in charge of the take down and final take over the both the United States government and the American people.

(ANTIMEDIA (http://theantimedia.org/)) San Diego, CA — With California finally mattering in an election season, it might be the final state primary before the Democratic race for president is set in stone. Regardless, recent developments have made one thing astoundingly clear: Donald Trump will almost surely defeat Hillary Clinton in a head to head matchup — and that's why a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for Donald Trump.

It may seem crazy to many, but Donald Trump is now leading — for the first time — in an average of national polls pitting the presumptive Republican nominee against Hillary Clinton. These results come at a time when Trump hasn't even started aggressively attacking her yet; after all, he just finished fending off over a dozen Republican primary yeah girl challengers — a feat thought all but impossible by political experts the world over.

Trump is rising and Hillary is sinking, but this is not a new phenomenon for Clinton — she's been sinking ever since she joined the race for the presidency. Operating almost exclusively on name recognition and gender identity alone, Clinton has seen her enormous lead in the polls over Bernie Sanders evaporate in the last several months, with some national polls even placing his popularity ahead of hers.

This should not be all that surprising in hindsight, with an unknown democratic socialist meteorically rising to catch one of the most well-known names in modern American politics. America is fed up with status-quo politics — and Clinton embodies this bad taste, which is now in a majority of Americans' mouths. But Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump don't. The all-but-guaranteed Clinton presidency now faces a fight from Bernie Sanders all the way to the Democratic convention.

Clinton, like Trump, faces a major favorability problem. Well over half of Americans view her unfavorably, and her honesty and likeability ratings are close to record lows. She's got an ongoing FBI problem (read: email scandal). Trump is running to the left of her on foreign policy, trade, and economy — and to the right of her on immigration. These are all issues that are resonating well for Trump and lackluster for Clinton, who has taken flack for everything from her cozy ties to Wall Street and support of NAFTA to the 1994 crime bill she helped Bill Clinton pass when he was in office.

Trump has only been the presumptive nominee for a few weeks, but he's already overtaken Hillary in the national polls. Considering her utter lack of momentum and enthusiasm, it doesn't take a political scientist to understand this equation looks like a sure defeat for Hillary Clinton.

The BFP/Newsbud roundtable takes on the 2016 election. Can elections ever change the system? Does voting the lesser evil result in less evil? If voting isn't the answer, what is? Join Sibel Edmonds, Peter B. Collins, Broc West and James Corbett for this heated discussion on strategy, tactics and ideals.

So concludes America's leading Russian expert, Professor Stephen Cohen (Princeton and New York University).  http://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-has-not-seen-such-amassing-of-hostile-military-forces-on-its-borders-since-1941/5526562

Professor Cohen asks if Washington is sleepwalking and needs to wake up or whether Washington has gone crazy and intends war.

Pepe Escobar advises Washington to "beware what you wish for: Russia is ready for war." http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44725.htm

Escobar reports that recently the Rand Corporation, "essentially a CIA outpost," concluded that "Russia could overrun NATO in a mere 60 hours, if not less." On the level of nukes and missile systems, Russia is four generations ahead of the US military/security complex, which is mainly interested in inflating profits with cost overruns. US weapons systems are simply outclassed.

... who have made rape accusations against Bill Clinton, Trump escalated his attack on Hillary and Bill Clinton in an interview with WaPo in which Trump called the circumstances of Vincent Foster's death "very fishy."

"He had intimate knowledge of what was going on," Trump said of Foster's relationship with the Clintons. "He knew everything that was going on and then all of a sudden he committed suicide."

As a reminder, Vince Foster, a longtime friend of the Clintons, was deputy White House counsel in the first few months of Clinton's presidency.  He was found dead from a gunshot wound to the mouth in July 1993. The three official investigations into Foster's death concluded he committed suicide as he suffered from depression, however unproven theories have constantly swirled that the Clintons were involved in Foster's death.

...

The Washington Post was not pleased, saying that "Trump is reviving some of the ugliest political chapters of the 1990s with escalating personal attacks on Bill Clinton’s character, part of a concerted effort to smother Hillary Clinton’s campaign message with the weight of decades of controversy."

But then suppose there was a tourist from Germany who was roaring drunk and belligerent and he asks me, "Hey man, I need another beer! Got a buck?" And then I gave him that dollar you just gave me and THEN I came back to you AGAIN and asked for ANOTHER dollar. Would you not say unto yourself, "This is ridiculous! I just gave Jack a buck and he gave it away! Now he asks for another dollar?! The nerve of this guy!" But then suppose while you're thinking this, I reach into my pocket for something, pull it out, and a thousand bucks fall out of my pocket.

Far-fetched? Of course, it is. I haven't got a thousand dollars or one dollar, for that matter. But where this is not far-fetched is with the United States government. This is precisely what they do with taxation. Now, our illustrious President Obama is giving billions of dollars of our tax money to terrorists in Syria. Oh, beg pardon, the "Syrian moderates". They have not yet graduated from ISIS High School and took their U.S.-supplied weapons with them. If the government has money enough to just dole it out to the equivalent of Middle Eastern street gangs, then one thing becomes painfully apparent: We are ALL being taxed TOO MUCH.

Hillary is also memorialized in what has become the crime capital of Europe: right off the street named for her husband is a store named "Hillary,"featuring women's clothing modeled after the putative Democratic party nominee for President. Pantsuits figure prominently. As Vice puts it: "While former President Bill Clinton has had a boulevard named after him, it's without a doubt that his wife's the real star out here." Why is that?

As Gail Sheehy pointed out in her biography of Hillary, it was Mrs. Clinton who hectored her husband into bowing to a chorus of neoconservative and liberal interventionist voices and finally giving the order to bomb the former Yugoslavia. Traveling to Kosovo when Serbs in the northern part of the country were demanding some form of local autonomy to stave off violent attacks by Kosovar ultra-nationalists, Mrs. Clinton reassured her hosts that the US would stand behind Pristina: "For me, my family and my fellow Americans this is more than a foreign policy issue, it is personal."

Bernie is just damaging Clinton in a big way.

Hillary Clinton did not cooperate with the State Department inspector general and his investigators, in the latest round of fact finding, but she has  maintained that she is  willing to talk with the FBI.  However, she then told MSNBC the bureau has not yet scheduled an interview. That's not quite the picture that known facts portray.

Finally, Clinton Is In Very Big Trouble

The most recent State Department inspector general report, finds Hillary Clinton broke government rules with her personal email use, and it exponentially increases "the likelihood and pressure (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/01/intel-source-ig-report-ups-pressure-on-doj-to-seek-criminal-charges-against-clinton.html?intcmp=hpbt1) for the Justice Department to pursue criminal charges, an intelligence source familiar with the FBI investigation told Fox News".

At issue are the 2,100 classified emails discovered on Clinton's private server constitute a violation of federal code, including the Espionage Act's 18 USC 793, known as the "gross negligence" statute. According to Fox News intelligence source, FBI Director James Comey plans to make a recommendation based on the evidence, to pursue criminal charges. However, the decision to prosecute ultimately rests with Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

Lynch is the Lynch-pin with regard to the criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Will she acquiesce and indict Clinton? The odds are slim and none. The DOJ could find dead bodies inside her computer, and Loretta Lynch-pin will not indict, the NWO heir-apparent to the presidency, Hillary Clinton.

Due to Her Own Criminal Background, Lynch Does Not Indict Fellow Democratic Criminals.

I am no fan of the Republicans, but the Democrats are dedicated to the overt destruction of the United States of America and the Constitution. Hillary Clinton is the evil personification of the Democratic party.

The Democratic Party Is the Enemy of the People

Of all the unconstitutional acts committed by the Democrats, the best, or worst, is yet to come. When Hillary Clinton receives the Democratic nod to be their Presidential candidate, America will enter the darkest days in her history.

America is facing unprecedented challenges and when one surveys the field of presidential candidates and we are forced to say that Donald Trump is our best candidate, it is safe to say that things could not be much worse. American is truly about to learn the meaning of the term “choosing between the lesser of two evils” and Hillary Clinton is as evil as they come.

Ron Paul Fears Hillary

...

That didn't matter to hillary in 2008 when losing against obama. Why should it be different now? Because she is winning this time? And she doesn't need him to damage her. She can do it all herself.

"Crime" and "indictment" are not the only terms Google is keeping hidden from searches of Hillary Clinton, a Washington Free Beacon analysis finds.

Common search terms associated with Clinton appear to have been scrubbed from Google as the tech giant has been accused of manipulating its autocomplete results to favor the Democratic presidential candidate.

Matt Lieberman of SourceFed released a video showing examples of Google skewing its autocomplete results for Clinton, while other search engines simply display the most searched terms.

"While researching for a wrap-up on the June 7 Presidential Primaries, we discovered evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton," SourceFed wrote. "If true, this would mean that Google Searches aren't objectively reflecting what the majority of Internet searches are actually looking for, possibly violating Google's algorithm."

For example, when searching Hillary Clinton "cri," Google finishes the phrase as "crime reform." On Yahoo, the result is "criminal charges." On Google's own trend website, there were not enough searches for Hillary Clinton and "crime reform" to build a graph of the results.

Typing Hillary Clinton and "ind" gives Google users results on Hillary Clinton and Indiana. On Microsoft's Bing search engine, a user gets Hillary Clinton and "indictment," yielding results for the FBI investigation into Clinton's private email server.

Expressing concerns in an ITV interview about the Democratic presidential candidate, who he claims is monitoring him, Assange described Republican presumptive nominee Donald Trump as an "unpredictable phenomenon", but predictably, given their divergent political views, didn't say if he preferred the billionaire to be president.

He was not asked if he supported Green Party candidate Jill Stein, even though she said she would immediately pardon Wikileaks whistleblower Chelsea Manning if elected.

"We have emails relating to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication," Assange told Peston on Sunday when asked if more of her leaked electronic communications would be published.

About 32,000 emails from her private server have been leaked by Wikileaks so far, but Assange would not confirm the number of emails or when they are expected to be published.

A leaked Hillary Clinton email confirms that the Obama administration, with Hillary at the helm,  orchestrated a civil war in Syria to benefit Israel.

The new Wikileaks release shows the then Secretary of State ordering a war in Syria in order to overthrow the government and oust President Assad, claiming it was the "best way to help Israel".

Newobserveronline.com reports:

The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton's private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.

The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government—and specifically to do this because it is in Israel's interests.

http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/clinton-email-syria-israel.jpg

"The best way to help Israel deal with Iran's growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad," Clinton forthrightly starts off by saying.

Frank And Claire Clinton--–The Real 'House Of Cards' Story (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/197434-2016-05-23-frank-and-claire-clinton-the-real-house-of-cards-story.htm)


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/533-0523105044-houseofcards6.jpg (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/197434-2016-05-23-frank-and-claire-clinton-the-real-house-of-cards-story.htm)




Read more at http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/frank-and-claire-clinton-direct-from-the-real-house-of-cards/. (http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/frank-and-claire-clinton-direct-from-the-real-house-of-cards/)


8)

His campaign, like his coiffure, is a few gilded threads spun together to give the impression of substance when there is plainly nothing underneath.

If you want to find the truth in politics, follow the money. And the Trump campaign's latest Federal Election Commission filing (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/21/trump-s-campaign-is-disastrously-short-on-cash.html) shows why the self-proclaimed billionaire and conservative populist deserves to be known as Con Man Donald.

The celebrity demagogue who delights in telling crowds that he is "very, very rich" is presiding over a Ponzi?scheme?like presidential campaign that — even as it has paid his own businesses millions of dollars — has just $1.3 million cash in hand (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/21/trump-s-campaign-is-disastrously-short-on-cash.html).

If this were a business, it would be going bankrupt. Instead it's a presidential campaign whose moral bankruptcy is on the verge of actual bankruptcy.

To put the Donald's dire straits in perspective, consider that Hillary Clinton's campaign now has over $42 million cash on hand, over 600 staffers and a 100% advantage in television ad buys. To put it in terms Con Man Donald might understand: Size matters.

All the spin of a celebrity demagogue can't eclipse the fact that the thicket of 22 businesses that he has paid through his campaign are evidence of a Potemkin marketing empire that exists to fund his lifestyle while avoiding as many taxes as possible (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/15/new-evidence-donald-trump-didn-t-pay-taxes.html) in the process.

Old habits die hard and based on the filing and its payments to Trump Ice and other afterthought entities, my guess is that when and if Con Man Donald ever releases his taxes (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/15/new-evidence-donald-trump-didn-t-pay-taxes.html) we'll see the true meaning of what his fellow 1980s real estate celebutante, Leona Helmsley, used to say: "Only the little people pay taxes."

Trump's Campaign Con Collapses. Sad! (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/199108-2016-06-22-trumps-campaign-con-collapses-sad.htm)


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/693-0622073544-trump-arms-stretched.jpg (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/199108-2016-06-22-trumps-campaign-con-collapses-sad.htm)




Read more at http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/21/con-man-donald-and-the-trumpster-fire-financial-report.html. (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/21/con-man-donald-and-the-trumpster-fire-financial-report.html)


8)

Debate: Do Elections Change Anything? by James Corbett (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/197551-2016-05-25-debate-do-elections-change-anything-by-james-corbett.htm)


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/687-0525052330-james-corbett-do-elections-matter.jpg (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/197551-2016-05-25-debate-do-elections-change-anything-by-james-corbett.htm)




https://i.ytimg.com/vi/07acUtzY1fM/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=320&h=180&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=T_Tw9p6t7esGQZ2BB7qmRByhLMk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07acUtzY1fM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07acUtzY1fM)


8)

While Trump's comments have received scrutiny, Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton's similar plan has not received the same amount of media attention.

In a recent talk at the Brookings Institution, Clinton said, "We're going to have to have more support from our friends in the technology world to deny online space. Just as we have to destroy their would-be caliphate, we have to deny them online space and this is complicated."

Like Trump, Clinton also shrugged off freedom of speech objections.

"You're going to hear all of the usual complaints, you know, freedom of speech, etc. But if we truly are in a war against terrorism, and we are truly looking for ways to shut off their funding, shut off the flow of foreign fighters, then we've got to shut off their means of communicating."

Former Secret Service officer Gary Byrne, author of the new book Crisis of Character, which examines Hillary Clinton's conduct under his watch, appeared on Monday's broadcast of FOX News Channel's Hannity. Byrne talked Hillary Clinton's temperament, her "terrified staff," Bill Clinton carrying on affairs, drug use in the White House and more with host Sean Hannity.

Byrne said Clinton was feared by her staff and was notorious for her yelling. Byrne told Hannity that she has "blown up" at him and other Secret Service agents.

"She gets angry at things that are policy issues that, you know, take time to fix, and she's got this attitude where she wants things fixed right now, immediately. She screams and yells at people," Byrne said in an interview aired Monday night.

...

But there was one particular staff member that they had come in in the morning, and they'd be so beat up and exhausted looking, worn out, exhausted to the point where they couldn't be seen saying good morning. And they'd go in their office and go the bathroom and come out of the bathroom completely elevated and happy and smiling.

The only decent president of the last decades was JFK.
We all know how it goes.
At that level if you don't get killed then you are there on purpose: there's no other way around.

Both Trump and Clinton are there as the opposite face of the same coin.

And, if that's the case or if that's the coin...
I would prefer Bitcoin.  ;) (leave me a small smile since all this makes me a bit sick, thinking we have no power over these muppets)

In fact, there's a long history of Clinton-related body counts (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php), with scores of people dying under mysterious circumstances.

Perhaps the most notable is Vince Foster. Foster was a partner at Clinton's law firm and knew the inner workings of the Clinton Machine.  Police ruled that death a suicide, though it is often noted that Foster may have been suicided (http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/01/25/special-report-notes-on-another-clinton-scandal-was-vince-foster-killed/).

Now, another official has found himself on the wrong end of the Clintons. That John Ashe was a former President of the United Nations General Assembly highlights the fact that no one is safe once in their sights.

And as you might have guessed, there are major inconsistencies with Ashe's death. It was not only conveniently timed because Ashe died just a few days before being set to testify against Clinton in a corruption case, but official reports indicated he died of a heart attack.

Actually, we DO have power over them. But it takes informing everyone.

The only way they can do what they do is through taxation. Income taxation is one of the easiest things to stop. You really need to "Meet Karl Lentz" at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1512214.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1512214.0). But don't stop there. Rather, watch/listen to the first two MP3s here http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html (episodes 187 & 188), and watch/listen to the Episodes 01 & 02 at the bottom of http://recordings.talkshoe.com/rss127469.xml.

Then go to https://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da and find all the videos that have "IRS" in them.

But don't stop there. Learn what Karl does as a way of life - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN3MI70PFBw.

8)

Having previously said she would not be voluntarily subjugated to an interview by the FBI in the agency's probe surrounding Hillary Clinton's email server, moments ago NBC reported that the Democratic presidential candidate, seemingly shaken by last week's events when a meeting between her husband and the US Attorney General Loretta Lynch has sparked a scandal suggesting there is backdoor collusion between the Clintons and the DOJ and that, as Judicial Watch put it, the "fix is in", has given a "voluntary" three and a half hour interview to the FBI over the use of her private email server.

As NBC reports, "presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton was questioned by the FBI in a long-awaited interview Saturday over the use of her private email server, an aide said. The interview's purpose was to delve into whether Clinton mishandled classified information submitted on her private email system while she served as secretary of state. Her top staffers have already given testimony."

However, due to the fallout from the recent private meeting between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton, the spotlight is now squarely shining on the FBI, and director Jim Comey in particular.

Recall that immediately after the public learned of the purely coincidental meeting, Lynch went into pure damage control mode. After simply telling reporters that all the two discussed was Bill's golf game and his grandchildren wasn't enough to quiet the questions surrounding the true intent of the meeting, Lynch decided to have a televised interview in order to clarify everything. During the interview, Lynch said that while she wasn't formally recusing herself from the decision whether or not to bring charges against Hillary, Lynch said that whatever recommendations were given from the department's career prosecutors and investigators, as well as the FBI director, would be accepted. Ironically, Lynch said that the decision to accept those recommendations was made long before the meeting with Clinton.

The criminal "just us" system continues to work superbly for untouchables at the top like Hillary Clinton.

The FBI has officially determined that no charges will be handed down in Hillary's State Dept. email server scandal because… "she had no intent to harm".

In point of fact, as it has been pointed out at length, the FBI essentially had to rewrite the law to let Hillary off:

There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was "extremely careless" and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services…

In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad things that happen due to gross negligence. I would point out, moreover, that there are other statutes that criminalize unlawfully removing and transmitting highly classified information with intent to harm the United States. Being not guilty (and, indeed, not even accused) of Offense B does not absolve a person of guilt on Offense A, which she has committed.

And, as it has also has been pointed out, other people have been charged by the FBI for a similar offense specifically without malicious intent.

During testimony before Congress on Thursday, FBI Director James Comey stated that the FBI's interview with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not under oath or recorded, but was careful to point out for all the paeons listening that it still would be a crime to lie to the FBI.

As Breitbart notes, Comey stated that he did not personally interview Clinton, and did not talk to all of the "five or six" who did interview Clinton.

He was then asked, "did she testify or talk to them under oath?" Comey answered, "No." But added that "it's still a crime to lie to us."

Yep...

Hillary Clinton said Monday that Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, was the most dangerous presidential candidate in the history of the United States. -CNN

Clinton, in an interview with CBS News' Charlie Rose, believes Donald Trump has "no self-discipline, no self-control, no sense of history, no understanding of the limits of the kind of power that any president should impose upon himself."

All of this could be applied to Clinton. She is by far the more dangerous of the two candidates.

If Clinton gets into office, she will start or expand wars and through large economic programs will ensure the US's quasi-depression deepens and that the economy never truly recovers at all (even though it may seem to.)

If things aren't getting worse, Hillary's power is not advancing. She is good at making things worse.

As her opponent, Donald Trump's main recommendation is that he has not been a politician before.

Donald Trump has chiefly been a builder and businessman.

But Hillary has basically been a politician.

Economically speaking, politics is price fixing. Laws are price-fixes, forbidding people from taking certain actions in favor of other ones.

We may agree or disagree with these price-fixes, but they exist and are a function of lawmaking.

Price-fixes always distort and degrade economies. The more laws you have, the more price-fixing and the more degradation.

We've often argued for private justice for instance in which individuals work out their own civil and criminal differences.

The less price-fixing (state control), the better.

The modern state – with its massive economic, political and judicial interference – is already well on its way to toppling.

Hillary Clinton has done well in the current system. She and her husband have built a gigantic non-profit and reportedly use it to trade favors with powerful people around the world.

She and Bill are connected at the highest levels and can influence US political and military decisions.

The FBI says no charges should be filed against Hillary Clinton. A federal judge on Monday declined to order the deposition of Hillary Clinton over whether she deliberately thwarted federal record-keeping laws— but did not rule out the possibility that the former Secretary of State may yet be forced to testify.

The real question: is Clinton being treated differently than the average American?

Let's give the FBI director a Reality Check.

Republicans on Capitol Hill hit FBI director James Comey with a barrage of questions just weeks ago. The center of that questioning was if Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, mishandled classified information. How has she not been charged yet if the answer was yes?

Here was Comey's answer:

"We don't want to put people in jail unless we prove that they knew they were doing something that they shouldn't do."

By now, we all know that the FBI ultimately determined not to charge Clinton, but do you understand why?

There are three levels of classification set by the U.S. government: confidential, secret, and top secret. Comey said that the FBI found 110 emails in 52 email chains from the Clinton servers that contained information that was classified at the time they were sent or received. Of those email chains, 36 were found to include information labeled secret and 8 were found to contain information labeled top secret.

That means that the repeated claims made by Clinton for months that she never sent any classified material that was classified at the time is not true.

So why was Clinton not charged?

Comey said he didn't recommend Clinton be prosecuted for "gross negligence" because only one person in 99 years has been.

To be clear, by any straightforward interpretation, Hillary Clinton broke the law. The law bans negligently hosting classified information in an unauthorized location.

Wikileaks has released nearly 20,000 emails it says are from the accounts of Democratic National Committee officials.

The release could cloud the upcoming Democratic party convention, which kicks off next week in Philadelphia.

It is unclear how Wikileaks obtained the records, but the release comes weeks after a hacker (or hackers) going by the name Guccifer 2.0 began releasing records obtained through the DNC's computer systems. The hacker claims to be Romanian, but many suspect that the records were taken by a team of Russian hackers.

Guccifer 2.0 has said that they obtained DNC emails. Other documents released by the hacker(s) include internal planning memos and databases of Democratic donors.

Bill Kristol, the beating neocon heart of the flat-lined Never Trump movement, has a message for Democrats who think Americans are too smart to vote for Donald Trump, like he did and (sorta) still does.

"If I were Hillary Clinton's campaign, I would be worried," the puckish founder of The Weekly Standard told me during an hourlong sit-down for POLITICO's "Off Message" podcast as the Republican National Convention was wrapping up in Cleveland last week.

"She's up like 5 points over Trump, who has made all these mistakes and he has more room to grow, I think, because he could reassure people if he runs a semi-intelligent, semi-normal campaign, whereas what's she going to do? I mean, there's no reintroduction of Hillary Clinton that could be possibly be made at this point, I think."

This election season is so much fun because Donald Trump keeps enraging all the right people – and his timing is perfect. Just as the Republican convention was at its height, with his running mate up there on the podium perorating about the alleged threat of Vladimir Putin, along comes Donald with an interview in the New York Times that has the War Party yelling and screaming bloody murder. The head of NATO; the foreign policy pundits; even some alleged "non-interventionists" – they're all aghast that Trump is questioning the supposedly sacred tripwires that commit us to going to war if Lower Slobbovia invades Upper Slobbovia.

It started with this article, in which Trump's views on NATO, the Turkey coup, and other matters were summarized, but it caused such a commotion that the Times published the entire interview, and it is really a sight to see – good news for us anti-interventionists, and very bad news for the internationalists, i.e. the entire foreign policy Establishment.

It starts off with Times reporter David Sanger trying to bait him into attacking Paul Ryan, who, he says, "presented a much more traditional Republican, engaged internationalist view of the world." Sanger reminds him of his previous comments on NATO: that our shiftless "allies" need to start paying their fair share of the costs of the alliance. Sanger adds in Korea and Japan, and ask: what if they won't pay? What then?

Trump's answer is vintage Trump:  "Then yes, I would be absolutely prepared to tell those countries, 'Congratulations, you will be defending yourself.'"

They are headed for their own Watergate, and it would be a pity to see the drama aborted. I'm only moderately vindictive: I want them hounded out of office, not hounded after they've already left.

This is getting good. As I write, Bill's old pal Bruce Lindsey* has been named an unindicted co-conspirator in the latest federal trial of the Arkansas mob. The Republicans want the special prosecutor to investigate three Clinton associates who may have perjured themselves before the Senate Whitewater Committee.

Both Clintons are under fire for the abuse of FBI files, a new scandal that has turned over several interesting rocks and revealed unsuspected dimensions of skullduggery: the thuggish Craig Livingstone, who was in charge of the file operation against the Clintons' enemies, is a character right out of the 1972 Nixon reelection campaign. He also turns out to be close to Hillary, and even helped clean out Vince Foster's office after his death. The Clintons' original story of "an innocent bureaucratic mistake" with the files has been exposed as a lie covering up something far more sinister. Every week brings a damaging revelation.

Democrats Nominate Clinton Crime Family for a 2nd Co-Presidency

by Stephen Lendman

Bill Clinton once bragged about electing him president meant getting "two for the price of one."

Here we go again. Exposed electoral rigging along with unelected party insider super-delegates handed the Clinton crime family another chance for the nation's highest office.

Will November electoral rigging assure it, letting both legally challenged Clintons lead America - perhaps into the abyss if occurs?

Sanders capped his sellout to everything he campaigned against, urging Hillary be nominated by acclamation. In disgust, over 500 of his delegates walked out.

He transformed himself into Hillary's puppet, a caricature of what he claims to be, a Judas goat leading followers astray, urging them to betray their principles and honor like he did - a despicable scoundrel selling out to wealth and power like all the rest.

Tuesday was a night of infamy, a time for national mourning - fascism on steroids emerging triumphant. All-out activism against a corrupted system is crucial.

The alternative is a nation more unsafe and unfit to live in than ever, Wall Street and war-profiteers more greatly empowered, neoserfdom for ordinary people, and the unthinkable risk of WW III with nuclear weapons able to end life on earth.

That's what "two for the price of one" emerging triumphant in November means. Defeating the Clinton crime family is vital.

Late in my life, I fear for young people, unable to have the advantages I had growing up. It was a different time.

An inner city kid with nothing going for me had opportunities unavailable today. Permanent wars, neoliberal harshness and police state terror turned America into humanity's scourge.

A neocon-run nation bent on global conquest and domination at any cost risks dystopian harshness for everyone but America's privileged class if we survive their onslaught.

The unacceptable danger of a 2nd Clinton crime family presidency is explained by Hillary once saying "(w)hat do we have NATO for if not to defend our way of life" - code language for endless wars of aggression, benefitting privileged Americans exclusively, no matter the cost to humanity.

Straightaway post-9/11, she urged waging war on terror - a pretext for forcefully transforming all sovereign independent nations into US vassal states.

She threatened Iran with total "obliterat(ion) (if they) consider(ed) launching an attack on Israel…"

As me-first lady, she supported genocidal sanctions on Iraq, killing 5,000 children aged five or under monthly. She praised George Bush's Islamophobia, fully supporting his agenda.

She favors nuclear weapons use, calling them peacekeeping deterrents. As secretary of state, she orchestrated war on Libya and Syria, raping and destroying both countries.

US foreign policy under her leadership ousted democratically elected Honduran and Paraguayan leaders. Following Haiti's devastating 2010 earthquake, she was involved in raping the country for profit along with rigging its election, installing a US puppet to run things.

The Clinton Foundation is a money-laundering self-enrichment racket masquerading as a charitable NGO - selling influence to special interests in return for millions of dollars in contributions.

It's hard imagining a more despicable choice for president than Killary - partnered with husband Bill for a second time around to run the country into the ground - likely taking planet earth with it this time if elected in November.

Top priority is preventing their return to the White House. Humanity's fate hangs in the balance.

According to the founder of WikiLeaks, the site has "accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment."

According to the founder of WikiLeaks, the site has "accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment."

...

In case you missed it, WikiLeaks recently leaked nearly 20,000 emails that were sent by officials of the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The emails exposed top officials showing favoritism towards Hillary Clinton's campaign at the expense of Bernie Sanders during the Democratic primary.

In result of the scandal, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, former chair of the DNC, was asked to resign. Just hours after she stepped down, however, Clinton hired the former-party leader to be an honorary chairman of the campaign's new "50-state" program.

It came as no shock that shortly after the scandal, Julian Assange, who is the founder of WikiLeaks, commented on the DNC's embarrassing behavior and Clinton's corrupt campaign.

He told Democracy Now!:

"I think this instruction by Luis Miranda, the head of communications, to go out and covertly spread anti-Bernie Sanders propaganda is a clear instruction combined with a chain of command. It's not simply expressing a sentiment. It is expressing an instruction within the DNC to subvert the Bernie Sanders campaign."

Assange also added that the "close relationship between the DNC and the media" is troubling, and is "something that we've all suspect happens, but this is concrete proof of it."

This isn't the first time Assange has spoken out again Clinton, or released incriminating information in an attempt to ruin her campaign. In the past, WikiLeaks published 30,322 emails from Clinton's private email server, spanning from June 30, 2010 to August 12, 2014. Though the information stunned most of the public, the FBI still refused to charge Clinton. You can read more about that here.

Regarding the information to come, he impressed that some of the most significant revelations from the leak have yet to be discovered by journalists:

"I really encourage people to research the more than 8,000 attachments that we put out, separate files, including more than 175 spreadsheets. That has the real core, the financial core, of the power structure and the exercise of monetary influence over the DNC. And that's something that's going to seed journalistic investigations for years," said Assange.

In an interview with ITV, he also relayed that WikiLeaks will soon be sharing documents that will provide "enough evidence" for the Department of Justice to indict the Democratic nominee. Apparently, WikiLeaks has "accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment."

Does he think the Obama administration's Justice Department will indict the former Secretary of State? Absolutely not. In fact, he told ITV:

"[Attorney General Loretta Lynch] is not going to indict Hillary Clinton. It's not possible that could happen. But the FBI could push for new concessions from the Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment."

Following the release of 20,000 Democratic National Committee emails by Wikileaks, there's been much ado about the source of the hack. Behind the release is a mysterious figure known only as Guccifer 2.0. It's been said he is Romanian, but U.S. intelligence officials claim that the technology used to compromise DNC systems included Russian language hacking tools.

The DNC, Clinton campaign and even President Obama are implying that Vladimir Putin is behind the hack and subsequent release of documents. The Kremlin has dismissed the allegations as absurd.

Russia has maintained that their long-standing policy is not to meddle in the elections of other countries. Of course, there are exceptions, and as the following report from Time Magazine suggests, Vladimir Putin has every reason to take down Hillary.

It's payback time and Putin may well be taking this opportunity to make good on a personal vendetta.

In December 2011, Vladimir Putin came closer than he's ever been to losing his hold on power. His decision that year to run for a third term as Russia's President had inspired a massive protest movement against him. Demonstrations calling for him to resign were attracting hundreds of thousands of people across the country. Some of his closest allies had defected to the opposition, causing a split in the Kremlin elites, and Russian state media had begun to warn of a revolution in the making.

At a crisis meeting with his advisers on Dec. 8 of that year, the Russian leader chose to lay the blame on one meddling foreign diplomat: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

I recently sat down with Casey Research founder Doug Casey to discuss this. Doug is a former classmate of Bill Clinton and has met him several times, including once at the White House.

Nick Giambruno: There is a popular conception that only the "best and brightest" go into government. I think this is a sacred cow that needs to be slaughtered. What's your take, Doug?

Doug Casey: It's a real problem when a pernicious myth subverts reality. Everybody believes that the institution of government is like Camelot—a wise ruler assisted by noble paladins. Maybe that meme gained traction in recent times with John Kennedy and his good-looking wife, Jackie. They looked like an ideal couple. They weren't. But they were a lot better than what followed for the next 50 years…

The fact is that the high levels of government do get people with high IQs. They can pass tests. They're skilled at manipulating both laws and people. But they tend to be of a low moral character, number one. Number two, despite their high IQs, they're actually quite stupid. Let me explain these things.

From a moral point of view, there are two types of people in the world. People who believe in coercion when dealing with their fellow humans. And people who believe in dealing voluntarily with their fellow humans.

The government is a force. The essence of government is coercion. So, people attracted to it are necessarily the wrong kind of people, coercion-oriented people. Government draws much more than its share of criminal personalities.

And they're not the most intelligent people—completely contrary to common belief. It's because one sign of intelligence is not just seeing the immediate and direct consequences of an action—any intelligent six-year-old can usually do that. It's seeing the indirect and delayed consequences of actions. They're very bad at that.

The surprising secret to Bill and Hillary Clinton's marriage … Tuesday night, Bill Clinton took the stage at the Democratic National Convention to make the case for another Clinton: the former U.S. Secretary of State– and his former First Lady — Hillary Clinton, as the next President of the United States …  It was powerful, convincing and heartfelt. But it was more than just a speech to satisfy an agenda; far more than a means to a political end. Loving, respectful, proud, and very human, his speech spoke volumes not only about his wife, the candidate, but, more notably, about the modern marriage ideal. –CNN

Bill Clinton's speech about Hillary Clinton was long lie, according to Dick Morris, the famous Clinton advisor who is now strongly anti-Clinton.

In a video on his website, DickMorris.com, he addresses the speech and rebuts it.

The rebuttal itself was interesting but gave rise to another question entirely.

Why would Bill Clinton present a false version of Hillary Clinton on such a prominent stage? Making so many apparently, fallacious statements is surely a risky business.

Of course, within the moment, the speech was a big hit. It presented Hillary as a loving wife and mother who'd spent her entire life helping people.

As we've pointed out in numerous past articles (see one HERE), Clinton is actually a candidate of the military-industrial complex and a proponent of the impending technocratic corporatism that is to be installed globally.

But Bill Clinton is determined to emphasize her "helping" side.

At one point, speaking of attempts to get her to marry him, he says:

So the second time I tried a different tack. I said I really want you to marry me, but you shouldn't do it. (LAUGHTER) And she smiled and looked at me, like, what is this boy up to?

She said that is not a very good sales pitch. I said I know, but it's true. And I meant it, it was true.

I said I know most of the young Democrats our age who want to go into politics, they mean well and they speak well, but none of them is as good as you are at actually doing things to make positive changes in people's lives.

The new material from the pro-transparency publisher includes 29 phone calls, totaling about 14 minutes. Many of them are complaints directed at the Democratic National Committee.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange warned CNN there would be "a lot more material" to come, following the publishing of hacked Democratic National Committee internal emails this past Friday.

And an orchestrated war with Russia has all of us marked for extinction

Paul Craig Roberts

The Democratic Party that once was concerned with workers' rights, the elderly, civil rights, and the constitutional protections of America liberty no longer exists. As the just completed Democratic presidential primaries and the Democratic presidential convention have clearly demonstrated, the United States now has two Republican parties in service to the One Percent.

The organized Democrats–the Democratic National Committee–have shown themselves to be even more venal and corrupt than the Republicans. Leaked emails document that the Democratic National Committee conspired with the Hillary campaign in order to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders. It is clear that Sanders was the choice of Democratic Party voters for president, but the nomination was stolen from him by vote fraud and dirty tricks.

The DNC and the media whores have tried to discredit the incriminating emails by alleging that the leaked emails resulted from a plot by Russia's President Vladimir Putin in behalf of "Putin's American agent," Donald Trump. "A vote for Trump is a vote for Putin," as the presstitute scum put it.

This diversionary tactic has not worked. Not even Americans are stupid enough to fall for it.

Consequently, the corrupt "leader" of the DNC had to resign and was unable to deliver her speech at the nominating convention from fear of being booed off the stage.

Sanders' supporters have abandoned Hillary and the fake "Democratic Party." Probably most of them will vote for the Green Party candidate.

The organized Republicans–the Republican National Committee–and the zionist neoconservatives wanted to block Donald Trump from the nomination just as the DNC blocked Sanders, but could not. The neoconservatives are organizing for Hillary as she is their warmonger and Trump says he is not, but as the Presidential contest is really a contest between the two Republican parties about which gets to be the whore for the One Percent, the RNC, impressed with Hillary's lack of voter support, seems to be sticking with Trump. Better to be a well-paid whore than to be out in the cold.

In the coming presidential election, the outcome will probably be determined by whether the powerful oligarchic interest groups decide whether Trump is an actual threat or whether they can cosy up to him and rope him in by appointing his government.

Over a year before Edward Snowden shocked the world in the summer of 2013 with revelations that have since changed everything from domestic to foreign US policy but most of all, provided everyone  a glimpse into just what the NSA truly does on a daily basis, a former NSA staffer, and now famous whistleblower, William Binney, gave excruciating detail to Wired magazine about all that Snowden would substantiate the following summer.

We covered it in a 2012 post titled "We Are This Far From A Turnkey Totalitarian State - Big Brother Goes Live September 2013." (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/%E2%80%9Cwe-are-far-turnkey-totalitarian-state-big-brother-goes-live-september-2013) Not surprisingly, Binney received little attention in 2012 - his suggestions at the time were seen as preposterous and ridiculously conspiratorial. Only after the fact, did it become obvious that he was right. More importantly, in the aftermath of the Snowden revelations, what Binney has to say has become gospel.

She knows that millions of Democratic voters absolutely despise her, and would rather vote for anyone else, or not vote at all. So she has to reel those voters back in, and convince them that she's going to fight for at least a few of the same socialist policies that were made popular by Sanders.

During a campaign stop in Nebraska earlier this week, she was doing her best Bernie impression as she called for a more equitable tax code (ie, one that will place more taxes on the rich) and criticized Trump because he "wants to cut taxes for the super-rich." Then she made what appears to be a Freudian slip, and revealed who she really wants to tax into oblivion.

This begs the question that both myself and countless others have been asking forever… who is a vote for Hillary Clinton REALLY for?

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have long been George Soros puppets, and George Soros doesn't care about the United States. He cares about a one world government. There will be a series of links at the bottom with dozens of stories most Hillary voters have never heard, largely because it's Soros and his globalist buddies who own our media, and see to it that people get as little information as possible.

During the last 214 years, past Presidents and political leaders have tried to warn the public that the U.S. government is under the control of an "invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people."

New evidence, courtesy of the latest WikiLeaks email dump, has allowed us to identify one member of the shadow government.

In the leaked email, titled 'Unrest in Albania,' George Soros instructs Secretary of State Clinton that "two things need to be done urgently" and proceeds to order the Secretary of State to "bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha" and "appoint a senior European official as mediator."

If anyone needs proof that the presidential race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton truly is dividing the country, they should look to Texas.

According to poll results from Public Policy Polling released Tuesday, three out of five Texans who support Donald Trump said they would support seceding from America if Hillary Clinton becomes president.

Zoie O'brien for Express UK reports AN ATTEMPTED break-in at the Ecuadorian embassy where WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is living was foiled this morning. Security was scrambled at the London building sparking international concern Assange was the target of the intruder.A statement was put out by WikiLeaks this morning.

^ wikileaks and assange have a long list of enemies. The dnc maybe the latest in the list. So that looks more like exploring the situation for political gain. On the other hand it is strange. No matter who tried to break into the embassy or why the police let it happen. With all the surveillance they have on assange and a police station 2 minutes away, they took more than 2 hours to respond to the incident.

No matter who tried to break into the embassy or why the police let it happen. With all the surveillance they have on assange and a police station 2 minutes away, they took more than 2 hours to respond to the incident.

Her neural implant getting hacked by Russians?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0RCW6Xa6d4

 ::)

A slide used during an Army training presentation lists Hillary Clinton as an "insider threat" alongside whistleblowers and mass shooters.


The image is a training slide regarding insider threats and the handling of classified information and featured photos of General David Petraeus, Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis, and Fort Hood Shooter Nidal Malik.

The slide is titled, "Who is the threat? Insiders," and listed Hasan, Manning, Snowden, and Alexis together under a bullet point. The next bullet point was titled, "Careless or disgruntled employees" and featured Petraeus and Clinton.

It was posted to a Facebook page called "U.S. Army W.T.F! Moments," on Sunday, and the Army verified its authenticity to the Washington Examiner. They noted that the slide was developed 18 months ago and was used to teach best practices for maintaining operational security, but stated that it is no longer in use.

All politicians lie. Rare exceptions prove the rule. Campaign lies are some of the worst - promising one thing, intending another if elected, betraying constituents every time.

Other than liar-in-chief Obama, perhaps no one else in memory is a more deplorable example than Hillary, a lying machine throughout her public disservice years since the 1990s.

Her Thursday Trump bashing speech was the latest example - too painful to listen to or watch. I read the transcript instead, unsettling enough.

Addressing a handpicked Reno, NV audience, she lied claiming direct contact with ordinary people "(e)verywhere I go," she said.

"What is the most shocking thing that you have found out about Hillary Clinton," co-host Ainsley Earhardt asked Assange.

"Well, I think the most interesting and serious," he said, pausing to choose his words carefully, "relate to upcoming publications we have.

"A variety of different types," he continued. "But a lot of information that we have already published, I mean it may not be that apparent to most people who are sort of not specializing in your politics and national security," he said.

He called it a "major failure" by Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders not to seize on Clinton's claim that she's qualified to run for president because of her judgement and experience in the State Department.

Dr. Drew spoke out on KABC radio regarding Hillary Clinton's health, an interview that is now deleted from KABC's website. Mark Dice breaks down Dr. Drew being fired for speaking out on Hillary's health.

Dr. Drew's Hillary Health Problem Admission CENSORED by Show's Producers!!!
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/18LUQTOerWY/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=336&h=188&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=h6u4bj3i_8VakmFTo1G8V_bL-bY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18LUQTOerWY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18LUQTOerWY)

Here we have more of the mainstream media censoring stories about Hillary's health and punishing anyone who dares to say anything truthful.  Dr. Drew raised serious questions about Hillary's health and mentioned her fall and subsequent concussion.

"When she hit her head, she had to wear these prism glasses when she came out. That is brain damage, and it's affecting her balance. Now clearly, it hasn't affected her cognition, but tell us a little more about that. That's profound. And then number two, when they screened her for heart disease, again, they did an old-fashioned screen. It just seems like she's getting care from somebody that she met in Arkansas when she was a kid, and you've got to wonder. You've got to wonder. It's not so much that her health is a grave concern. It's that the care she's getting could make it a concern." – Dr. Drew Pinsky

You knew you lost the argument as soon as you went Godwin in the title, right?

Just so you know, Godwin's law states that you are going to have a Hitler/Nazi reference, it does not mean the argument is false because of it. For instance, if we are talking about exterminating a certain type of people (eugenics), then I can certainly say that it is Nazi-like, and I won't be wrong. 

The title is the place that showed there isn't any argument.    8)

Hillary Clinton's recent "alt right" speech marks a new and dangerous low in what has become race to the bottom – and, should she be elected, it has ominous foreign policy implications as well.

Alarmed that Trump is reaching out to the African-American community, Mrs. Clinton tried to make the case that the GOP candidate is a apologist for such groups as the Ku Klux Klan (do they still exist?) and an obscure amalgam she dubbed the "alt right." As she named this latter group, there was a significant silence, a pause in the cheering: perhaps her audience thought she was having a senior moment of the intestinal variety.

In any case, none of this is anything new: it's a variation on the "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy" theme that she has been dragging out ever since the 1990s. There is, however, a new dimension to this tired boilerplate, now that she's running for President: the Vast Right-wing Conspiracy is being portrayed an international cabal with its headquarters in the Kremlin.

I agree with that last post. Back when Obama was running, her campaign had criticized Obama supporters as "Obama Boys", to put emphasis on her gender. Then again in 2016, she called Bernie supporters "Bernie bros". Then she claimed she was a victim of a smear campaign when, she was the one who impugned her own integrity.

Trump was right. If Hitlery was a male, then she would have never secured the Democratic nomination in the first place. She secured the nomination thanks to the shameful display of her gender card and due to the brainwashed feminists supporting her. The Americans committed a mistake eight years ago, by electing Barack Obama just because he was black. I hope that they will be wiser this time around.

"Free election of masters does not abolish the masters or the slaves." Herbert Marcuse

The FBI is worried: foreign hackers have broken into two state election databases.

The Department of Homeland Security is worried: the nation's voting system needs greater protection against cyberattacks.

I, on the other hand, am not overly worried: after all, the voting booths have already been hacked by a political elite comprised of Republicans and Democrats who are determined to retain power at all costs.

The outcome is a foregone conclusion: the police state will win and "we the people" will lose.

The damage has already been done.

The DHS, which has offered to help "secure" the nation's elections, has already helped to lock down the nation.

Remember, the DHS is the agency that ushered in the domestic use of surveillance drones, expanded the reach of fusion centers, stockpiled an alarming amount of ammunition, urged Americans to become snitches through a "see something, say something" campaign, oversaw the fumbling antics of TSA agents everywhere, militarized the nation's police, spied on activists and veterans, distributed license plate readers and cell phone trackers to law enforcement agencies, contracted to build detention camps, carried out military drills and lockdowns in American cities, conducted virtual strip searches of airline passengers, established Constitution-free border zones, funded city-wide surveillance cameras, and generally turned our republic into a police state.

So, no, I'm not falling for the government's scare tactics about Russian hackers.

I'm not losing a night's sleep over the thought that this election might by any more rigged than it already is.

And I'm not holding my breath in the hopes that the winner of this year's particular popularity contest will save us from government surveillance, weaponized drones, militarized police, endless wars, SWAT team raids, red light cameras, asset forfeiture schemes, overcriminalization, profit-driven private prisons, graft and corruption, or any of the other evils that masquerade as official government business these days.

What I've come to realize is that Americans want to engage in the reassurance ritual of voting.

They want to believe that politics matter.

They want to be persuaded that there's a difference between the Republicans and Democrats (there's not).

They will swear that Barack Obama has been an improvement on George W. Bush (he has not).

They are convinced that Hillary Clinton's values are different from Donald Trump's (with both of them, money talks).

Most of all, they want to buy into the fantasy that when we elect a president, we're getting someone who truly represents "we the people" rather than the corporate state (in fact, in the oligarchy that is the American police state, an elite group of wealthy donors is calling the shots).

The sad truth is that it doesn't matter who wins the White House, because they all work for the same boss: Corporate America. Understanding this, many corporations hedge their bets on who will win the White House by splitting their donations between Democratic and Republican candidates.

Politics is a game, a joke, a hustle, a con, a distraction, a spectacle, a sport, and for many devout Americans, a religion. It is a political illusion aimed at persuading the citizenry that we are free, that our vote counts, and that we actually have some control over the government when in fact, we are prisoners of a police state.

In other words, it's a sophisticated ruse aimed at keeping us divided and fighting over two parties whose priorities are exactly the same so that we don't join forces and do what the Declaration of Independence suggests, which is to throw the whole lot out and start over.

It's no secret that both parties support endless war, engage in out-of-control spending, ignore the citizenry's basic rights, have no respect for the rule of law, are bought and paid for by Big Business, care most about their own power, and have a long record of expanding government and shrinking liberty. Most of all, both parties enjoy an intimate, incestuous history with each other and with the moneyed elite that rule this country.

Despite the jabs the candidates volley at each other for the benefit of the cameras, they're a relatively chummy bunch away from the spotlight. Moreover, despite Congress' so-called political gridlock, our elected officials seem to have no trouble finding common ground when it's time to collectively kowtow to the megacorporations, lobbyists, defense contractors and other special interest groups to whom they have pledged their true allegiance.

So don't be fooled by the smear campaigns and name-calling or drawn into their politics of hate. They're just useful tactics that have been proven to engage voters and increase voter turnout while keeping the citizenry at each other's throats.

We're in trouble, folks.

We are living in a fantasy world carefully crafted to resemble a representative democracy.

It used to be that the cogs, wheels and gear shifts in our government machinery worked to keep our republic running smoothly. However, without our fully realizing it, the mechanism has changed. Its purpose is no longer to keep our republic running smoothly. To the contrary, this particular contraption's purpose is to keep the corporate police state in power. Its various parts are already a corrupt part of the whole.

Hillary Clinton's worst nightmare has come to life in this exclusive interview with her former Secret Service Officer, Gary Byrne. For the first time on the Next News Network he reveals the inside story of the filthy truth she doesn't want you to know, that he witnessed first hand while assigned to the Oval Office as her protection detail. The media is censoring this truth – please share.

Thirty such emails are now in question, as the former secretary of state's claims she handed over all work-related emails for an investigation wears thinner by the day.

As the Associated Press reports, "Government lawyers told U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta Tuesday that an undetermined number of emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton."

The State Department's lawyer told the judge it would take through the end of September to vet the documents and redact any classified information prior to release — but Mehta, skeptical of a lengthy delay, ordered State to report back in a week with an explanation for why it would the process would take so long.

One of many lawsuits brought by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch was the subject of Tuesday's hearing.

Judicial Watch, hackers, the FBI, and an unidentified source through Wikileaks have all provided further information proving a pattern of mendacity by Clinton, her campaign, and the Democratic National Committee in recent months — but the Democratic nominee continues to feign ignorance about how classified and work-related emails weren't turned over pursuant to several investigations.

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/51098-2/.[/b][/url]
8)

You realize that The Freethought Project is anti-Nationalism, and anti religion right?

Which is a good thing, but it completely contradicts your views.

Are you trying to say that they are lying about this story?    8)

Not at all, I'm trying to help you be more consistent in your ideology. I see you follow The Freethought Project, but don't believe in free thought, ironic.

Earlier this week, a twitter user named "Katica" seemingly proved the "intent" of the Hillary campaign to destroy and/or tamper with federal records by revealing the Reddit thread of Paul Combetta (aka the "Oh Shit" guy; aka "stonetear").  But what's most crazy about this story is that "Katica" was able to discover the greatest "bombshell" of the entire Hillary email scandal with just a couple of internet searches while the FBI, with unlimited access to government records, spent months "investigating" this case and missed it all.  The only question now is whether the FBI "missed" this evidence because of gross incompetence or because of other motivating factors?

Now, courtesy of an opinion piece posted on The Daily Caller, we know exactly how "Katica" pieced her "bombshell" discovery together...the folks at the FBI may want to take some notes.

Per the twitter discussion below with @RepStevenSmith, "Katica" discovered Combetta's Reddit thread on September 16th.  But while she suspected that Paul Combetta and the Reddit user known as "stonetear" were, in fact, the same person, she had to prove it...

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton reportedly wanted to drone Wikileaks founder Julian Assange when she was secretary of state.

According to True Pundit, Clinton and the state department were under pressure to silence Assange and Wikileaks in the months before the whistleblowing site released a massive dump of 250,000 diplomatic cables from 1966 up to 2010, dubbed CableGate.

"Can't we just drone this guy?" Clinton asked, according to unidentified state department sources.

Published by True Pundit on Sunday, Wikileaks posted a link to the story on their official Twitter account on Monday, along with a screenshot of the article.

Clinton and the state department held numerous meetings to discuss what could be done about Assange and his site which had already exposed damning military secrets about the war in Afghanistan and Iraq before the promised document dump was to come. The department was under pressure from both the White House and foreign governments to silence Wikileaks.