Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Altcoin Discussion => Topic started by: carborundum on April 02, 2013, 04:35:48 PM



Title: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: carborundum on April 02, 2013, 04:35:48 PM
When Bitcoin mining becomes only for those rich few that can afford an ASIC, the GPU miners will turn to Litecoin.

Litecoin will have a wider base of miner enthusiasts and its popularity will grow and surpass Bitcoin.

ASICs will kill Bitcoin, the future currency has to be for the masses to be involved with not a new central bank of ASIC elite!


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: phantastisch on April 02, 2013, 04:42:35 PM
When Bitcoin mining becomes only for those rich few that can afford an ASIC, the GPU miners will turn to Litecoin.

Litecoin will have a wider base of miner enthusiasts and its popularity will grow and surpass Bitcoin.

ASICs will kill Bitcoin, the future currency has to be for the masses to be involved with not a new central bank of ASIC elite!

Go ahead. There will be a Litecoin Asic. And it will be more expensive and more Elite.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: Vuxil on April 02, 2013, 04:45:20 PM
Uh...how about when ASICs hit economies of scale and everyone has one?


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: jgarzik on April 02, 2013, 04:46:36 PM
Increased hash rate == increased network security.

Also, litecoin is certainly not at all immune to ASIC.



Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: mr_random on April 02, 2013, 05:08:13 PM
When Bitcoin mining becomes only for those rich few that can afford an ASIC, the GPU miners will turn to Litecoin.

Litecoin will have a wider base of miner enthusiasts and its popularity will grow and surpass Bitcoin.

ASICs will kill Bitcoin, the future currency has to be for the masses to be involved with not a new central bank of ASIC elite!

Go ahead. There will be a Litecoin Asic. And it will be more expensive and more Elite.

Except if you want a speed boost there is no way to efficiently parallel compute the Scrypt algorithm without throwing loads of money at it to the point it becomes prohibitively expensive. This is proven mathematically in the Scrypt paper - http://www.tarsnap.com/scrypt/scrypt.pdf (Litecoin uses Scrypt for this reason)

People will bring out ASICs and FGPAs but unless there is a computer science breakthrough the performance increase won't be dramatic on a per dollar basis. Simply not possible.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: mr_random on April 02, 2013, 05:10:17 PM
Increased hash rate == increased network security.


True but Litecoin has found a sweet spot where users can get a high hashrate using GPUs without unfair ASICs offering ridiculous perfomance enhancements.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: BadBear on April 02, 2013, 05:11:21 PM
When Bitcoin mining becomes only for those rich few that can afford an ASIC, the GPU miners will turn to Litecoin.

Litecoin will have a wider base of miner enthusiasts and its popularity will grow and surpass Bitcoin.

ASICs will kill Bitcoin, the future currency has to be for the masses to be involved with not a new central bank of ASIC elite!

Go ahead. There will be a Litecoin Asic. And it will be more expensive and more Elite.

Except if you want a speed boost there is no way to efficiently parallel compute the Scrypt algorithm without throwing loads of money at it to the point it becomes prohibitively expensive. This is proven mathematically in the Scrypt paper - http://www.tarsnap.com/scrypt/scrypt.pdf (Litecoin uses Scrypt for this reason)

People will bring out ASICs and FGPAs but unless there is a computer science breakthrough the performance increase won't be dramatic on a per dollar basis. Simply not possible.

So only the rich can afford it? That sure sounds like a better plan than making it affordable and available to the masses.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: mr_random on April 02, 2013, 05:16:06 PM
When Bitcoin mining becomes only for those rich few that can afford an ASIC, the GPU miners will turn to Litecoin.

Litecoin will have a wider base of miner enthusiasts and its popularity will grow and surpass Bitcoin.

ASICs will kill Bitcoin, the future currency has to be for the masses to be involved with not a new central bank of ASIC elite!

Go ahead. There will be a Litecoin Asic. And it will be more expensive and more Elite.

Except if you want a speed boost there is no way to efficiently parallel compute the Scrypt algorithm without throwing loads of money at it to the point it becomes prohibitively expensive. This is proven mathematically in the Scrypt paper - http://www.tarsnap.com/scrypt/scrypt.pdf (Litecoin uses Scrypt for this reason)

People will bring out ASICs and FGPAs but unless there is a computer science breakthrough the performance increase won't be dramatic on a per dollar basis. Simply not possible.

So only the rich can afford it? That sure sounds like a better plan than making it affordable and available to the masses.

No you misunderstand and didn't read the link. If someone spends 10k on a Scrypt Asic it won't give them a 100 times performance boost over someone rigging together 10k's worth of top graphics cards.

Some performance boost will be gained but the algorithm was specifically designed so a government entity for example couldn't crack a Scrypt hashed password by simply throwing more money at the hardware because it will become exponentially more expensive. Again, read the paper it's all in there.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: Vuxil on April 02, 2013, 05:18:53 PM
Again guys, the ASIC shortage will be just short-term scarcity. Eventually more ASICs will be out on the market than people want, economies of scale are hit, and then we can have a healthy distributed ASIC network. This could actually help us, because it forces any entity wanting to attack the network to invest in ASICs instead of being able to use traditional hardware. What other way could it turn out?


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: cbeast on April 02, 2013, 05:19:13 PM
I am mining LTC for the suckers speculators that will trade them for BTC, because I only have GPUs. I suspect MTGOX is accepting LTC for the same reason, not because it has any inherit advantage over BTC.

As far as who mines LTC vs. BTC goes, energy efficiency will determine the strength of the network. Energy efficiency is what determines the evolutionary survival of just about everything.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: wormbog on April 02, 2013, 05:21:44 PM
If 10 scrypt miners w/ video cards have 10x the chance to find a block as an individual user, then the system scales linearly. The same can be created with an ASIC with a bunch of parallel units and memory.

Anything that can be accomplished with general-purpose hardware can be accomplished more efficiently with a custom ASIC. And memory is getting cheaper by the day.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: Vuxil on April 02, 2013, 05:22:01 PM
As far as who mines LTC vs. BTC goes, energy efficiency will determine the strength of the network. Energy efficiency is what determines the evolutionary survival of just about everything.

I agree, which is why I only mine PPC now  ;D


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: mr_random on April 02, 2013, 05:23:59 PM
I suspect MTGOX is accepting LTC for the same reason, not because it has any inherit advantage over BTC.

Mtgox is accepting them because they are currently missing out on a 0.6% fee of millions of litecoins that are traded daily. They are a business and they care about making money... at the moment btc-e is making tens of thousands of dollars per day from these litecoins, and they are still small.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: hanzac on April 02, 2013, 05:28:17 PM
Litecoin is suitable for small payment, bitcoin is suitable for big bid. So they can co-exist with less competition.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: cbeast on April 02, 2013, 05:30:37 PM
I suspect MTGOX is accepting LTC for the same reason, not because it has any inherit advantage over BTC.

Mtgox is accepting them because they are currently missing out on a 0.6% fee of millions of litecoins that are traded daily. They are a business and they care about making money... at the moment btc-e is making tens of thousands of dollars per day from these litecoins, and they are still small.
MTGOX is the primary exchange for new investors. Adding LTC, NMC, NVC, IXC, etc., will just make BTC look cheap and reinforce the notion that we should all just wait and see which one will be the best.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: Luno on April 02, 2013, 05:35:09 PM
Same logic applies to llitecoin as it to bitcoin: Buy with fiat, don't sell a valuable asset to buy another with possible the same or less potential.  Bitcoin is world wide mainstream now, at least in hype. It's like selling your apple stocks back in 98 for $48 and buy AOL.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: mr_random on April 02, 2013, 05:39:15 PM
Adding LTC, NMC, NVC, IXC, etc., will just make BTC look cheap and reinforce the notion that we should all just wait and see which one will be the best.

That's how you view because you're still stuck thinking there should be a single dominant cryptocurrency (BTC). The cryptocurrencies offer different advantages... PPCoin being energy efficient, Litecoin using Scrypt, Bitcoin having the most traction and most secure network... it might not ever be the case of one being 'the best'.

Also, investors care about different things. With a range of cryptocurrencies they can invest in a portfolio and spread their risk, or put it all into a risky cheap crypto. And so on.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: cbeast on April 02, 2013, 05:42:53 PM
Adding LTC, NMC, NVC, IXC, etc., will just make BTC look cheap and reinforce the notion that we should all just wait and see which one will be the best.

That's how you view because you're still stuck thinking there should be a single dominant cryptocurrency (BTC). The cryptocurrencies offer different advantages... PPCoin being energy efficient, Litecoin using Scrypt, Bitcoin having the most traction and most secure network... it might not ever be the case of one being 'the best'.

Also, investors care about different things. With a range of cryptocurrencies they can invest in a portfolio and spread their risk, or put it all into a risky cheap crypto. And so on.
You are right. Highly intelligent and educated investors do that, but not people with large amounts of money.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: coblee on April 02, 2013, 05:51:48 PM
Increased hash rate == increased network security.

Also, litecoin is certainly not at all immune to ASIC.

Litecoin is not immune to ASICs but ASICs won't give a hashrate boost on mining Litecoins as much as it does for Bitcoins. You are right, as Litecoin price goes up, ASIC litecoin miners will inevitably come out when it becomes profitable.

I don't agree that "Increased hash rate == increased network security". When ASIC bitcoin mining is widely available, if you have the same number of people mining, the network won't be more secure just because the hashrate is higher. It's all about how much $ it takes for an attacker to come up with enough hashrate to 51% the network. ASICs might eventually increase the network hashrate 50x but that does not mean the network is 50x more secure if it costs the same amount of money for someone to successfully attack the network.

Take for example, if someone found a way to optimize the miner software to be 10x better hashrate and it works on CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, and ASICs. Then all of the sudden, the next day EVERYONE uses the new miner software and the network hashrate jumps from 50 thahs/s to 500 thash/s. Is the network now ten times more secure?


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: cbeast on April 02, 2013, 06:07:43 PM
Increased hash rate == increased network security.

Also, litecoin is certainly not at all immune to ASIC.

I don't agree that "Increased hash rate == increased network security". When ASIC bitcoin mining is widely available, if you have the same number of people mining, the network won't be more secure just because the hashrate is higher. It's all about how much $ it takes for an attacker to come up with enough hashrate to 51% the network. ASICs might eventually increase the network hashrate 50x but that does not mean the network is 50x more secure if it costs the same amount of money for someone to successfully attack the network.

Take for example, if someone found a way to optimize the miner software to be 10x better hashrate and it works on CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, and ASICs. Then all of the sudden, the next day EVERYONE uses the new miner software and the network hashrate jumps from 50 thahs/s to 500 thash/s. Is the network now ten times more secure?
If that strawman is the best example you can come up with to play devil's advocate, then no. But do you really think that a network composed of <1% of the global GPUs is invulnerable to a virus attack? Bitcoin was nearly attacked this way, but the perps instead decided to profit. Maybe LTC will not be so lucky.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: coblee on April 02, 2013, 06:16:38 PM
Increased hash rate == increased network security.

Also, litecoin is certainly not at all immune to ASIC.

I don't agree that "Increased hash rate == increased network security". When ASIC bitcoin mining is widely available, if you have the same number of people mining, the network won't be more secure just because the hashrate is higher. It's all about how much $ it takes for an attacker to come up with enough hashrate to 51% the network. ASICs might eventually increase the network hashrate 50x but that does not mean the network is 50x more secure if it costs the same amount of money for someone to successfully attack the network.

Take for example, if someone found a way to optimize the miner software to be 10x better hashrate and it works on CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, and ASICs. Then all of the sudden, the next day EVERYONE uses the new miner software and the network hashrate jumps from 50 thahs/s to 500 thash/s. Is the network now ten times more secure?
If that strawman is the best example you can come up with to play devil's advocate, then no. But do you really think that a network composed of <1% of the global GPUs is invulnerable to a virus attack? Bitcoin was nearly attacked this way, but the perps instead decided to profit. Maybe LTC will not be so lucky.

Where did I say Litecoin is invulnerable to attacks? If huge botnet that uses CPU and GPU can successfully attack Litecoin. But botnet operators likely just want to make money, so as like Bitcoin, they will just add to the hashrate and help secure Litecoin.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: cbeast on April 02, 2013, 06:27:08 PM
Increased hash rate == increased network security.

Also, litecoin is certainly not at all immune to ASIC.

I don't agree that "Increased hash rate == increased network security". When ASIC bitcoin mining is widely available, if you have the same number of people mining, the network won't be more secure just because the hashrate is higher. It's all about how much $ it takes for an attacker to come up with enough hashrate to 51% the network. ASICs might eventually increase the network hashrate 50x but that does not mean the network is 50x more secure if it costs the same amount of money for someone to successfully attack the network.

Take for example, if someone found a way to optimize the miner software to be 10x better hashrate and it works on CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, and ASICs. Then all of the sudden, the next day EVERYONE uses the new miner software and the network hashrate jumps from 50 thahs/s to 500 thash/s. Is the network now ten times more secure?
If that strawman is the best example you can come up with to play devil's advocate, then no. But do you really think that a network composed of <1% of the global GPUs is invulnerable to a virus attack? Bitcoin was nearly attacked this way, but the perps instead decided to profit. Maybe LTC will not be so lucky.

Where did I say Litecoin is invulnerable to attacks? If huge botnet that uses CPU and GPU can successfully attack Litecoin. But botnet operators likely just want to make money, so as like Bitcoin, they will just add to the hashrate and help secure Litecoin.
That may be true. All I'm saying is that getting a lot of CPUs and GPUs together to attack LTCs 4.7 GH/s is going to be easier than going up against BTCs 54 TH/s


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: coblee on April 02, 2013, 07:12:08 PM
Increased hash rate == increased network security.

Also, litecoin is certainly not at all immune to ASIC.

I don't agree that "Increased hash rate == increased network security". When ASIC bitcoin mining is widely available, if you have the same number of people mining, the network won't be more secure just because the hashrate is higher. It's all about how much $ it takes for an attacker to come up with enough hashrate to 51% the network. ASICs might eventually increase the network hashrate 50x but that does not mean the network is 50x more secure if it costs the same amount of money for someone to successfully attack the network.

Take for example, if someone found a way to optimize the miner software to be 10x better hashrate and it works on CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, and ASICs. Then all of the sudden, the next day EVERYONE uses the new miner software and the network hashrate jumps from 50 thahs/s to 500 thash/s. Is the network now ten times more secure?
If that strawman is the best example you can come up with to play devil's advocate, then no. But do you really think that a network composed of <1% of the global GPUs is invulnerable to a virus attack? Bitcoin was nearly attacked this way, but the perps instead decided to profit. Maybe LTC will not be so lucky.

Where did I say Litecoin is invulnerable to attacks? If huge botnet that uses CPU and GPU can successfully attack Litecoin. But botnet operators likely just want to make money, so as like Bitcoin, they will just add to the hashrate and help secure Litecoin.
That may be true. All I'm saying is that getting a lot of CPUs and GPUs together to attack LTCs 4.7 GH/s is going to be easier than going up against BTCs 54 TH/s

Don't forget that mining litecoin with GPUs is about 1000x different in speed. So 4.7 ghash/s network hashrate of Litecoin is about equivalent to 4.7 thash/s network hashrate of Bitcoin. It's still much smaller, but not as small as the numbers make it seem like.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: cbeast on April 02, 2013, 09:48:45 PM
Increased hash rate == increased network security.

Also, litecoin is certainly not at all immune to ASIC.

I don't agree that "Increased hash rate == increased network security". When ASIC bitcoin mining is widely available, if you have the same number of people mining, the network won't be more secure just because the hashrate is higher. It's all about how much $ it takes for an attacker to come up with enough hashrate to 51% the network. ASICs might eventually increase the network hashrate 50x but that does not mean the network is 50x more secure if it costs the same amount of money for someone to successfully attack the network.

Take for example, if someone found a way to optimize the miner software to be 10x better hashrate and it works on CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, and ASICs. Then all of the sudden, the next day EVERYONE uses the new miner software and the network hashrate jumps from 50 thahs/s to 500 thash/s. Is the network now ten times more secure?
If that strawman is the best example you can come up with to play devil's advocate, then no. But do you really think that a network composed of <1% of the global GPUs is invulnerable to a virus attack? Bitcoin was nearly attacked this way, but the perps instead decided to profit. Maybe LTC will not be so lucky.

Where did I say Litecoin is invulnerable to attacks? If huge botnet that uses CPU and GPU can successfully attack Litecoin. But botnet operators likely just want to make money, so as like Bitcoin, they will just add to the hashrate and help secure Litecoin.
That may be true. All I'm saying is that getting a lot of CPUs and GPUs together to attack LTCs 4.7 GH/s is going to be easier than going up against BTCs 54 TH/s

Don't forget that mining litecoin with GPUs is about 1000x different in speed. So 4.7 ghash/s network hashrate of Litecoin is about equivalent to 4.7 thash/s network hashrate of Bitcoin. It's still much smaller, but not as small as the numbers make it seem like.

That's only because it takes advantage of the typical PC configuration. Currently, most people are already running LTC on GPUs. When prople start using cloud computing, where will your network power come from? ASICs are made specifically for Bitcoin and will evolve seperately from personal devices. LTC may one day have unique hardware, but it will then be just a BTC imitator.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: tgsrge on April 02, 2013, 10:02:10 PM
That's only because it takes advantage of the typical PC configuration. Currently, most people are already running LTC on GPUs. When prople start using cloud computing, where will your network power come from? ASICs are made specifically for Bitcoin and will evolve seperately from personal devices. LTC may one day have unique hardware, but it will then be just a BTC imitator.
yes, please, go ahead and speed up scrypt by a factor of 1000 ::)


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on April 02, 2013, 10:05:02 PM
No you misunderstand and didn't read the link. If someone spends 10k on a Scrypt Asic it won't give them a 100 times performance boost over someone rigging together 10k's worth of top graphics cards.

Some performance boost will be gained but the algorithm was specifically designed so a government entity for example couldn't crack a Scrypt hashed password by simply throwing more money at the hardware because it will become exponentially more expensive. Again, read the paper it's all in there.

It may have been designed that way but then the creators crippled it by using parameters which make is ~14,000x less memory hard then the default settings.  An Litecoin ASIC is more than possible.  The value of mining will need to be much higher but that was also true of Bitcoin.  Nobody was talking BTC ASICs when the Bitcoin exchange rate was $3 either.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: flound1129 on April 02, 2013, 10:08:18 PM
I suspect MTGOX is accepting LTC for the same reason, not because it has any inherit advantage over BTC.

Mtgox is accepting them because they are currently missing out on a 0.6% fee of millions of litecoins that are traded daily. They are a business and they care about making money... at the moment btc-e is making tens of thousands of dollars per day from these litecoins, and they are still small.
MTGOX is the primary exchange for new investors. Adding LTC, NMC, NVC, IXC, etc., will just make BTC look cheap and reinforce the notion that we should all just wait and see which one will be the best.

Why shouldn't we do just that?

Bitcoin is not necessarily the best, just the first.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: Mike Christ on April 02, 2013, 10:12:36 PM
I wouldn't dump Bitcoin or Litecoin.  But I am dumping the fiat for both ;D


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: cbeast on April 02, 2013, 10:14:37 PM
I suspect MTGOX is accepting LTC for the same reason, not because it has any inherit advantage over BTC.

Mtgox is accepting them because they are currently missing out on a 0.6% fee of millions of litecoins that are traded daily. They are a business and they care about making money... at the moment btc-e is making tens of thousands of dollars per day from these litecoins, and they are still small.
MTGOX is the primary exchange for new investors. Adding LTC, NMC, NVC, IXC, etc., will just make BTC look cheap and reinforce the notion that we should all just wait and see which one will be the best.

Why shouldn't we do just that?

Bitcoin is not necessarily the best, just the first.
Absolutely. Let the market decide. Just don't be surprised when LTC2, LTC3, LTC4, etc do better than LTC.

That's only because it takes advantage of the typical PC configuration. Currently, most people are already running LTC on GPUs. When prople start using cloud computing, where will your network power come from? ASICs are made specifically for Bitcoin and will evolve seperately from personal devices. LTC may one day have unique hardware, but it will then be just a BTC imitator.
yes, please, go ahead and speed up scrypt by a factor of 1000 ::)

You missed my point. Try running scrypt in an IPAD or Chromebook. Nobody will have multithreading CPUs anymore with loads of memory.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: allthingsluxury on April 02, 2013, 10:34:26 PM
I wouldn't dump Bitcoin or Litecoin.  But I am dumping the fiat for both ;D

Hear hear!


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: cbeast on April 02, 2013, 10:45:37 PM
I take it all back. Go Litecoin! Viva la Bitcoin! Drive on Namecoin! There is more than enough room for all of these currencies and more to go to the moon!


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: coblee on April 02, 2013, 11:00:22 PM
I take it all back. Go Litecoin! Viva la Bitcoin! Drive on Namecoin! There is more than enough room for all of these currencies and more to go to the moon!

http://i.qkme.me/3q2qlu.jpg


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: cbeast on April 02, 2013, 11:10:40 PM
I take it all back. Go Litecoin! Viva la Bitcoin! Drive on Namecoin! There is more than enough room for all of these currencies and more to go to the moon!

http://i.qkme.me/3q2qlu.jpg
I think it would be a death knell for MTGOX to adopt other currencies, but it won't hurt Bitcoin a bit. In fact it would open up more serious exchanges and brokerages to the Bitcoin market.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: tgsrge on April 02, 2013, 11:37:27 PM
Just because people are dumb and buying LTC it does not mean it is going to become useful.
>implying litecoin is not already useful.

this is pointless, fwiw, bitcoin was for a loooong time just a 100% speculative thing. a lot of people still view (and treat) bitcoin like that.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: flound1129 on April 02, 2013, 11:40:10 PM

LTC is overpriced almost worthless coin. For every item or service you can actualy buy with it there is 100x more items or services you can buy with BTC.


And for a vendor who already accepts cryptocurrency and wants access to more customers there is a negligible cost of implementing additional crytpocurrencies.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: johnyj on April 03, 2013, 01:00:34 AM
Current technology shift is like when people switch from CPU to GPU, BFL play a very big role here, they are going to distribute ASIC devices to many different kind of users. If I get it right, they have some 30000 order or so, that should give enough people access to ASIC mining devices, and it's typically cheaper than GPU mining devices


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: MegatonWarrior on April 03, 2013, 01:07:53 AM
LTC is based on specific technology with the assumption that ASIC's will not be used.  BTC is based on Moore's Law and independent of specific technology.  LTC was created to deter GPU's but now they are the dominant technology.  Once a LTC ASIC is made, the distinction between LTC and BTC will be close to nil.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: tgsrge on April 03, 2013, 10:34:25 AM
Wrong parallel. Bitcoin is still alive. You are not living in a parallel universe without Bitcoin. The mere fact Bitcoin was first cryptocoin out there gives it
complete and absolute "cleanup" from all "bad" things that happened around it. What "cleanup" you have for Litecoin? Is there even 1 thing Bitcoin could
copy / paste from Litecoin that didn't originated from Bitcoin? Scrypt? Nope, all you did is changed Bitcoin algo with another one. Is there any concept,
technology, structure, module, ideology, purpose or anything like that in Litecoin but not in Bitcoin? Nope. Copy / paste change few lines of code kids!

All this bullshits from the mouths of you who invested in LTC is about nothing more but attempting to add some value to it so you can profit. Ask anyone
who has no cryptocoins whatsoever what would be his or her choice if he or she decides to jump onto cryptocoin train. Litecoin? Gotta be complete retard
or someone who is versed with investments, and is ready to go with very high risk in order to eventualy profit a bit more than investing in bitcoins.

Not even 6 months ago I had no cryptocoins at all, but I worked for bitcoins. Now I can buy over 1 THashes of ASICs with what I earned, for those same
bitcoins. I don't have to mess with any other currency whatsoever. Once LTC comes even close to allowing such a deal, I'll start taking it seriously.

Until then, keep on dreaming and pray someone else do the job - that is most of Litecoiners are capable of, judging based on lack of LTC purchasing power.
i dont even know what the fuck you're on about now. look at the fucking charts. litecoin hit $1 for the first time a few days ago. it's now sitting at ~4.5. You can ignore, disrespect, call us all a bunch of devil-worshippers and even excommunicate those who use litecoin it's not going to make any difference. early adopters (and even not so early adopters) are quite enjoying their profits from making the right calls, and the world probably has more than a few new millionaires today. Now, if you (and some others) want to keep denying the reality that's your own fucking (boneheaded) choice.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: Mjbmonetarymetals on April 03, 2013, 11:06:28 AM
As it becomes clearer that new money is finding its way to Litecoin rather than drawing from Bitcoin as in they both increase in value at the same time, then we can all site around a campfire roasting marshmellows in peace.  ;D


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: Liquid on April 03, 2013, 11:39:34 AM
converted 30 BTC to LTC  ;)


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on April 03, 2013, 11:52:56 AM
When Bitcoin mining becomes only for those rich few that can afford an ASIC, the GPU miners will turn to Litecoin.

Litecoin will have a wider base of miner enthusiasts and its popularity will grow and surpass Bitcoin.

ASICs will kill Bitcoin, the future currency has to be for the masses to be involved with not a new central bank of ASIC elite!

Go ahead. There will be a Litecoin Asic. And it will be more expensive and more Elite.

Except if you want a speed boost there is no way to efficiently parallel compute the Scrypt algorithm without throwing loads of money at it to the point it becomes prohibitively expensive. This is proven mathematically in the Scrypt paper - http://www.tarsnap.com/scrypt/scrypt.pdf (Litecoin uses Scrypt for this reason)

People will bring out ASICs and FGPAs but unless there is a computer science breakthrough the performance increase won't be dramatic on a per dollar basis. Simply not possible.

So only the rich can afford it? That sure sounds like a better plan than making it affordable and available to the masses.

No you misunderstand and didn't read the link. If someone spends 10k on a Scrypt Asic it won't give them a 100 times performance boost over someone rigging together 10k's worth of top graphics cards.

Some performance boost will be gained but the algorithm was specifically designed so a government entity for example couldn't crack a Scrypt hashed password by simply throwing more money at the hardware because it will become exponentially more expensive. Again, read the paper it's all in there.
You don't spend 10k on a ASIC, R&D are FAR MORE THAN that for bitcoin.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: tgsrge on April 03, 2013, 12:04:53 PM
As it becomes clearer that new money is finding its way to Litecoin rather than drawing from Bitcoin as in they both increase in value at the same time, then we can all site around a campfire roasting marshmellows in peace.  ;D
yup. people seem to think that any other cryptocurrency being viable = a threat to bitcoin. this is a fallacy. it makes several non-valid assumptions.
bitcoin, litecoin, namecoin, etc are not enemies. it's not a zero sum game. they're all part of the same "ecosystem", but they are not even remotely competing for the same "food"/resources per say.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: phelix on April 03, 2013, 12:05:05 PM
I like alternacoins for the fun and for experimenting to improve Bitcoin. Also for new features like with namecoin (database).

A GPU / ASIC resistant coin was a very good idea but from what I know the Scrypt parameters used in Litecoin are far from optimum. Also the launch felt kinda fishy (lots of orphans at the start; possibly secretly GPU mined later on).

Maybe it's because I don't own any but I just don't like Litecoin.

A real GPU resistant coin would be a killer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95257 "hash algo more GPU-resistant than scrypt?"


edit: clarification on when GPU mining started


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: wizzardTim on April 03, 2013, 12:09:00 PM
Litecoin is much better now. BTC may rise x5, but LTC may rise x50!!!!!


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: tgsrge on April 03, 2013, 12:30:52 PM
For all you profit retards, TRC went from 0.0001 to 0.005 in a week or so - that would be $1 to $50, match that! Enjoy money made on LTC because that
is the only thing you can enjoy while dealing with LTC. It ain't gonna buy you much on it's own. The same goes for all other altcoins, with Namecoin having
some value actualy. One can make money on altcoins because and only because there is Bitcoin, but you retards got it the wrong way. You probably think
that altcoins would profit if Bitcoin dies. Dump Bitcoin in favour of Litecoin? Right, let's kill Bitcoin, let's drop BTC price, it would make Litecoin more valuable,
stable and useful - not really, it is exactly the oppossite!

You are blinded by profit to extreme, hence you are aware of nothing except the fact you made some money or you lost some money. For you, nothing else
matters. Since it is so, you would be better selling drugs, doing slave trades, smuggling nuclear weapons over the border and so on - which you would be
doing for sure if only you have balls, mental and physical capabilities. Since you don't have what it takes, making $1000 because external factors caused LTC
price to rise is a major achievement for you. Go tell that to rich people around you, they will laugh at you for being lame, incapable and incompetent.
except for the "small" market depth and market cap difference. (~720025BTC ltc market cap vs ~4066BTC trc market cap , or a difference of ~17708+%). bitcoin and litecoin are not competing for the same, fixed amount of already available resources.
as for using it to actually buy stuff, you can exchange it for usd....or you can spend it on one of the various ltc-accepting services. http://uselitecoin.com/ . and no, i dont think it would be healthy for any altcoin if bitcoin died, nor would i want bitcoin to die.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: regular on April 03, 2013, 12:57:08 PM
I think Litecoin's fast transactions and resistance to centralization (more ASIC proof) could give it a leg up with real merchants in the future.  Since people are now getting familiar with the wallets and cryptocoin transactions, the hurdle for LTC should be less.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: wizzardTim on April 03, 2013, 01:16:25 PM
I think Litecoin's fast transactions and resistance to centralization (more ASIC proof) could give it a leg up with real merchants in the future.  Since people are now getting familiar with the wallets and cryptocoin transactions, the hurdle for LTC should be less.

Exactly  8)


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: malvino on April 05, 2013, 03:27:33 PM
I think LTC will grow up because people love to mine. Even people who just bought ASIC will keep their GPU to mine whatever they could. And LTC is the perfect way to do that. I'm talking about people with small rigs, who mines for fun (and for money too ;D), but more for fun.

Litecoin first will be a way to obtain Bitcoins with GPU mining in ASIC era, but due to that use will grow up to become the first altcoin and coexist with BTC.


Title: Re: Anyone Thinking Of Dumping Bitcoin In Favour of Litecoin?
Post by: carborundum on April 05, 2013, 03:34:49 PM
I think LTC will grow up because people love to mine. Even people who just bought ASIC will keep their GPU to mine whatever they could. And LTC is the perfect way to do that. I'm talking about people with small rigs, who mines for fun (and for money too ;D), but more for fun.

Litecoin first will be a way to obtain Bitcoins with GPU mining in ASIC era, but due to that use will grow up to become the first altcoin and coexist with BTC.

Exactly. I'm still buying GPUs expecting to mine Litecoin with them once the ASIC aristocracy ruining mining for the common man. Litecoin is what I'll be spending and encouraging soon.