Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: remotemass on April 09, 2013, 07:50:55 AM



Title: Bitcoins article on the front page of Financial Times
Post by: remotemass on April 09, 2013, 07:50:55 AM
http://oi47.tinypic.com/2vrsmr7.jpg


Title: Re: Bitcoins article on the front page of Financial Times
Post by: gogxmagog on April 09, 2013, 07:53:46 AM
"on its way to becoming the next bubble"
I agree. We aint seen nothin yet!


Title: Re: Bitcoins article on the front page of Financial Times
Post by: alexeft on April 09, 2013, 08:30:08 AM
In other words:

" Watch out investors. Don't invest in bitcoin because you will lose your worth. Invest in what we tell you to." Implies: there are some that already know what you learn from us, which implies that your money is safer in hands other than yours, since in markets, the one that has information before the others is at a great advantage. What a piece of bull...

BUT, any publicity is good publicity.  ;D


Title: Re: Bitcoins article on the front page of Financial Times
Post by: adrian33 on April 09, 2013, 10:21:27 AM
In other news, ex-Goldman in wire fraud guilty plea - it may be or may not be a bubble, but at least they won't get outright stolen!


Title: Re: Bitcoins article on the front page of Financial Times
Post by: blockbet.net on April 09, 2013, 11:13:30 AM
$138? Funny how that article is already so out of date...

Good thing Financial Times were telling their readers not to buy when it was at such a low level :)


Title: Re: Bitcoins article on the front page of Financial Times
Post by: briannguyen on April 09, 2013, 11:57:33 AM
lol every week we see new peak and the price continues to rise with no limit.


Title: Re: Bitcoins article on the front page of Financial Times
Post by: Carlton Banks on April 09, 2013, 01:25:49 PM
Lolling at the banner story "Reflation regime. Why Japan stands to win"

Contrast is thunderously laughable. Bitcoin's the bubble, and BOJ money printing will end with happy faces? These people call themselves the Financial Times? They need to change the title to the Corporatist Past