|
Title: tbearhere community reaction Post by: yahoo62278 on December 20, 2016, 11:03:24 AM Not that i need to justify my trust to this user but i do want to prove a point or 2 with this thread. User tbearhere was in the byteball campaign for a few weeks. He failed to qualify for any of the weeks of participation in this campaign. That wouldve been around 12/13 when i did the post counts. 5 days later this guy decides to give me a little color in my profile.(im ok with it and im not posting this to cry)
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/06/07/wpIZj.png Now, i know trust isnt moderated and im not asking anyone to remove this. I just want to show this user and you the community hes a vindictive piece of work and you should avoid him if trading or adding him to a sig campaign. Upon seeing this feedback i went back over the spreadsheet to see what notes i had on the guy and find the reason he may have tagged me. Mistakes happen im human, so i decided to have a look. Heres the notes i had for him. https://talkimg.com/images/2023/06/07/wpskG.png Now, the rules for that campaign state a user needs 30 qualifying posts in the week to qualify for payment. Obv he had 26 posts falling short of the goal. If you take a look at the quality that week(dec 6th-12th) youll see https://talkimg.com/images/2023/06/07/wp3BD.png https://talkimg.com/images/2023/06/07/wpvdf.png https://talkimg.com/images/2023/06/07/wpYFZ.png https://talkimg.com/images/2023/06/07/wpfh8.png I could go on but you get the point. This is another 5-6 posts of his 26 he would not have gotten credit for. Also if youll notice most if not all of these comments were in the same damn thread. This is the same for the previous weeks he was in campaign as well. Apparently he feels like he is owed pay for that week i guess. All im saying is this is not constructive posting and this will not get you paid. If you dont do as this guy wants he obv gets all righteous and tags ya so id steer clear of the guy if you have any sense. (by steer clear i dont mean be afraid. just dont do business with him or have him in your campaigns) Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: Avirunes on December 20, 2016, 11:28:04 AM Just checked the signature campaign thread and found this:-
Quote - Constructive posts only 100 characters or more and on topic. Posts in pic were mostly unconstructive and was also out of character limit. Anyway he deserves that. I also won't allow such user in my campaign who doesn't reads up the rule clearly and later on demands campaign manager for payout to be processed to him later on. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: SFR10 on December 20, 2016, 02:01:39 PM Nothing from your side is wrong but him on the other hand (failure to read the rules and follow them) seems to understand things completely they way he only wants. Regardless of those posts (which were awful), even if he lacked a single posts, he doesn't deserve to receive a single cent (rules are rules and all involved parties should follow it). Back when I used to manage campaigns, there were a lot of users that lacked a single posts to receive payments for those periods but even though I felt sorry for them, I had no choice to deny them and what you've done in this case is completely correct and based on the campaign rules itself.
Not sure why a lot of "Legendary" members don't follow, read and understand rules and it's very annoying (given that they've been here the longest). Update: People should either only selectively get 'promoted' to such a rank or selectively get demoted based on their actions/knowledge. I fully support that (in case it gets implemented somehow).Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: Lauda on December 20, 2016, 02:11:27 PM Just ignore him/her. It's just another random spammer that is unable to read, understand and follow the campaign rules.
Back when I used to manage campaigns, there were a lot of users that lacked a single posts to receive payments for those periods but even though I felt sorry for them, I had no choice to deny them and what you've done in this case is completely correct and based on the campaign rules itself. That's the only correct way handle something like that. Rules are rules, and should be bent by no one and for no one.Not sure why a lot of "Legendary" members don't follow, read and understand rules and it's very annoying (given that they've been here the longest). This is why an activity based system is misleading and wrong. People should either only selectively get 'promoted' to such a rank or selectively get demoted based on their actions/knowledge.Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: jamalaezaz on December 20, 2016, 03:41:48 PM Just ignore him/her. It's just another random spammer that is unable to read, understand and follow the campaign rules. And a bought/sold high ranked account should suddenly turn into newbie. Because it actually become newbie. I'm pretty much sure that is a bought account.Back when I used to manage campaigns, there were a lot of users that lacked a single posts to receive payments for those periods but even though I felt sorry for them, I had no choice to deny them and what you've done in this case is completely correct and based on the campaign rules itself. That's the only correct way handle something like that. Rules are rules, and should be bent by no one and for no one.Not sure why a lot of "Legendary" members don't follow, read and understand rules and it's very annoying (given that they've been here the longest). This is why an activity based system is misleading and wrong. People should either only selectively get 'promoted' to such a rank or selectively get demoted based on their actions/knowledge.Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: jamyr on December 20, 2016, 10:40:49 PM @yahoo,
You're the best campaign manager here. You follow your own rules so people working under you should do the same. @Lauda Demoting feature would be great especially for accounts that goes inactive for more than a year. I don't know if my opinion weighs lighter than a sr. Member but I just wanted to tell that both of you are doing excellent. You guys deserve a merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! 8) Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: ImHash on December 20, 2016, 11:08:18 PM Don't forget about me yahoo62278, I know that I said I wont bother you anymore about my negative feed back via PM though, but come on man please delete it because obviously people trying to take advantage over me only because of red trust and seems not only it's not helping anyone to not get scammed(considering red trust should be used to tag scammers and cases like mine honestly should be posted as neutral, because not accepting my manager's decision shouldn't take me as hostage). but it is helping others to abuse me.
Me not making thread about it shouldn't make your DT responsibilities any less valuable. I am asking you please change your feed back to neutral if you still want people to know about it. EDIT: after posting this amazingly yahoo acted just in time so that I could slap a real abuser in the face. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1674842.msg17248997#msg17248997 Thanks man/woman :D for your understanding. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: Lauda on December 21, 2016, 09:02:16 AM Demoting feature would be great especially for accounts that goes inactive for more than a year. I'll talk to the admin to see what they think about this. However, this discussion should not be continued in this thread.EDIT: after posting this amazingly yahoo acted just in time so that I could slap a real abuser in the face. It's not abuse FYI. If he doesn't trust you, based on your actions then the rating is valid (it may only be improperly written). The system is a (centralized) web-of-trust. Let's not discuss your case in a thread regarding a completely different user.And a bought/sold high ranked account should suddenly turn into newbie. Because it actually become newbie. I'm pretty much sure that is a bought account. It wouldn't surprise me if they were part of a ring of farmers or something.Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 09:51:08 AM He is a good guy and reads the rules properly. yahoo is a scammer falsifying his records. Here is proof.
https://i.imgur.com/0ApaHOT.png Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: Lauda on December 21, 2016, 09:54:18 AM He is a good guy and reads the rules properly. yahoo is a scammer falsifying his records. Here is proof. 1) Your imagine insertion is broken.2) This is not proof of anything. 3) Your rating is useless, and not visible by default since you are not in default trust depth 1 or 2. 4) You don't seem to understand the trust system here. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 09:56:29 AM @yahoo62278
Need I get an international lawyer ? To solve this false accusations? Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 09:57:10 AM He is a good guy and reads the rules properly. yahoo is a scammer falsifying his records. Here is proof. 1) Your imagine insertion is broken.2) This is not proof of anything. 3) Your rating is useless, and not visible by default since you are not in default trust depth 1 or 2. 4) You don't seem to understand the trust system here. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 10:13:49 AM @yahoo62278 Need I get an international lawyer ? To solve this false accusations? Looks like it. I took the no trust off...He will be contacting you. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: jamalaezaz on December 21, 2016, 10:15:02 AM He is a good guy and reads the rules properly. yahoo is a scammer falsifying his records. Here is proof. 1) Your imagine insertion is broken.2) This is not proof of anything. 3) Your rating is useless, and not visible by default since you are not in default trust depth 1 or 2. 4) You don't seem to understand the trust system here. 5) result is: you are a newbie here and have zer information about bitcointalk forum. 6) Moral: Surf the forum properly first. Before joining any campaign (actually before buying account) @yahoo62278 Need I get an international lawyer ? To solve this false accusations? Looks like it. I took the no trust off...He will be contacting you. Ur first reply also seems like you are vouching your own self. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 10:33:46 AM yahoo62278 Hero Member ***** Online Online Activity: 910 View Profile Personal Message (Online) Trust: 11: -0 / +2 Re: (No subject) « Sent to: tbearhere on: December 19, 2016, 10:49:43 PM » « You have forwarded or responded to this message. » Reply with quoteQuote ReplyReply Remove this messageDelete You left me worthless trust for no reason. You werent paid because you didnt qualify. So if you wanna play the neg trust game i can play too Report To Admin .BITSLER. ▄███ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄██▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▄████▄ ▄████▄ ▀████▄ █████ ██████ ██████ █████ ▀████▄ ▀████▀ ▀████▀ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄▄████▀ ▀██████▀ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ THE FASTEST BTC DICE GAMES ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▄▄█▄▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▀▄▄ ▀█▀▀ ▄ ▀████ ▀▀▄ █ █▄ ▀▄ ▀████ ▀▀ ▄██▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▀▀ ▀▄▄ ▀████ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ █ █ ▄ ▀▄ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▄▄ ███ ▀██ █ ▀▀ █ █ ███ ▀██ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▄ █ ▀▀ █ ▀▀▄ ███▄ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▄ █ ▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ 0 CONFIRMATION INSTANT DEPOSIT ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄ ▄▄████████████████▄▄ ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄ ▄ ▄█████▀ ▀█████▄ ██▄▄ █████▀ ▄ ▀█████ ████████ ▄██ █████ ████████▄ ███▀ ████▄ █████████▀▀ ▄███▀ █████ █▀▀▀ █████ █████ ▄▄▄ ████ █████ █████ ▀▀ ████▀ █████ █████ █████▄ ▄█████ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀ ▀▀████████████████▀▀ ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ AVAILABLE 24/7 FRIENDLY SUPPORT ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄ ▄█▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀▀█▄ █▀▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▀█ █▀▀ ███████████████████ ▀▀█ █▀ ███████████████████████ ▀█ █▀ ███████████████▀▀ ███████ ▀█ ▄█▀ ██████████████▀ ▀█████ ▀█▄ ███ ███████████▀▀ ▀▀██ ███ ███ ███████▀▀ ███ ███ ▀▀▀▀ ███ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀ █▄ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █▄ ▀█████████▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▀▀█████ [ play & join our BIG COMMUNITY ] yahoo62278 Hero Member ***** Online Online Activity: 910 View Profile Personal Message (Online) Trust: 11: -0 / +2 Re: (No subject) « Sent to: tbearhere on: December 20, 2016, 05:30:33 AM » « You have forwarded or responded to this message. » Reply with quoteQuote ReplyReply Remove this messageDelete you were paid 2 of the 3 weeks which is why i dont understand your feedback at all. You werent paid for week 3 becuase you didnt qualify. So tell me exactly how i dont pay? Your feedback is false, thats what i see. Again your feedback means shit cause everyone here knows im not fucking you or ripping you off. Youre just being a prick and its gonna get you nowhere. Enjoy kid Report To Admin .BITSLER. ▄███ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄██▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▄████▄ ▄████▄ ▀████▄ █████ ██████ ██████ █████ ▀████▄ ▀████▀ ▀████▀ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄▄████▀ ▀██████▀ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ THE FASTEST BTC DICE GAMES ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▄▄█▄▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▀▄▄ ▀█▀▀ ▄ ▀████ ▀▀▄ █ █▄ ▀▄ ▀████ ▀▀ ▄██▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▀▀ ▀▄▄ ▀████ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ █ █ ▄ ▀▄ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▄▄ ███ ▀██ █ ▀▀ █ █ ███ ▀██ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▄ █ ▀▀ █ ▀▀▄ ███▄ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▄ █ ▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ 0 CONFIRMATION INSTANT DEPOSIT ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄ ▄▄████████████████▄▄ ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄ ▄ ▄█████▀ ▀█████▄ ██▄▄ █████▀ ▄ ▀█████ ████████ ▄██ █████ ████████▄ ███▀ ████▄ █████████▀▀ ▄███▀ █████ █▀▀▀ █████ █████ ▄▄▄ ████ █████ █████ ▀▀ ████▀ █████ █████ █████▄ ▄█████ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀ ▀▀████████████████▀▀ ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ AVAILABLE 24/7 FRIENDLY SUPPORT ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄ ▄█▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀▀█▄ █▀▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▀█ █▀▀ ███████████████████ ▀▀█ █▀ ███████████████████████ ▀█ █▀ ███████████████▀▀ ███████ ▀█ ▄█▀ ██████████████▀ ▀█████ ▀█▄ ███ ███████████▀▀ ▀▀██ ███ ███ ███████▀▀ ███ ███ ▀▀▀▀ ███ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀ █▄ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █▄ ▀█████████▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▀▀█████ [ play & join our BIG COMMUNITY ] yahoo62278 Hero Member ***** Online Online Activity: 910 View Profile Personal Message (Online) Trust: 11: -0 / +2 Re: (No subject) « Sent to: tbearhere on: December 20, 2016, 05:40:51 AM » « You have forwarded or responded to this message. » Reply with quoteQuote ReplyReply Remove this messageDelete LOL the transaction is your false feedback. Show me where i screwed you?HuhHuh?? You cant. According to this chart you did 26 posts the final week. Thats 4 short of the 30 needed to qualify for payment. Theres reason 1 you werent paid for that week. Reason 2 is of that 26 posts at least 5 were rejected if not 10. Even if you had gotten 30 posts you wouldnt have been paid as the quality was shit. Im gonna get the community view on this for you so you can get some more red paint Report To Admin .BITSLER. ▄███ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄██▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▄████▄ ▄████▄ ▀████▄ █████ ██████ ██████ █████ ▀████▄ ▀████▀ ▀████▀ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄▄████▀ ▀██████▀ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ THE FASTEST BTC DICE GAMES ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▄▄█▄▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▀▄▄ ▀█▀▀ ▄ ▀████ ▀▀▄ █ █▄ ▀▄ ▀████ ▀▀ ▄██▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▀▀ ▀▄▄ ▀████ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ █ █ ▄ ▀▄ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▄▄ ███ ▀██ █ ▀▀ █ █ ███ ▀██ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▄ █ ▀▀ █ ▀▀▄ ███▄ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▄ █ ▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ 0 CONFIRMATION INSTANT DEPOSIT ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄ ▄▄████████████████▄▄ ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄ ▄ ▄█████▀ ▀█████▄ ██▄▄ █████▀ ▄ ▀█████ ████████ ▄██ █████ ████████▄ ███▀ ████▄ █████████▀▀ ▄███▀ █████ █▀▀▀ █████ █████ ▄▄▄ ████ █████ █████ ▀▀ ████▀ █████ █████ █████▄ ▄█████ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀ ▀▀████████████████▀▀ ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ AVAILABLE 24/7 FRIENDLY SUPPORT ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄ ▄█▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀▀█▄ █▀▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▀█ █▀▀ ███████████████████ ▀▀█ █▀ ███████████████████████ ▀█ █▀ ███████████████▀▀ ███████ ▀█ ▄█▀ ██████████████▀ ▀█████ ▀█▄ ███ ███████████▀▀ ▀▀██ ███ ███ ███████▀▀ ███ ███ ▀▀▀▀ ███ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀ █▄ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █▄ ▀█████████▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▀▀█████ [ play & join our BIG COMMUNITY ] yahoo62278 Hero Member ***** Online Online Activity: 910 View Profile Personal Message (Online) Trust: 11: -0 / +2 Re: (No subject) « Sent to: tbearhere on: December 20, 2016, 06:08:12 AM » « You have forwarded or responded to this message. » Reply with quoteQuote ReplyReply Remove this messageDelete https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19NnZBTgGujwO6OkWXnYV4zqkVz_df5h4hkQDAXHMYpw/edit#gid=796407528 Look down around the 53rd spot on sheet 3 4 5. You never qualified for payment. You need 30 Quality posts in order to get paid. You never posted 30 in a week that were quality. You were denied payment rightfully. Learn how to post and youd get paid Report To Admin .BITSLER. ▄███ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄██▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▄████▄ ▄████▄ ▀████▄ █████ ██████ ██████ █████ ▀████▄ ▀████▀ ▀████▀ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄▄████▀ ▀██████▀ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ THE FASTEST BTC DICE GAMES ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▄▄█▄▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▀▄▄ ▀█▀▀ ▄ ▀████ ▀▀▄ █ █▄ ▀▄ ▀████ ▀▀ ▄██▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▀▀ ▀▄▄ ▀████ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ █ █ ▄ ▀▄ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▄▄ ███ ▀██ █ ▀▀ █ █ ███ ▀██ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▄ █ ▀▀ █ ▀▀▄ ███▄ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▄ █ ▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ 0 CONFIRMATION INSTANT DEPOSIT ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄ ▄▄████████████████▄▄ ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄ ▄ ▄█████▀ ▀█████▄ ██▄▄ █████▀ ▄ ▀█████ ████████ ▄██ █████ ████████▄ ███▀ ████▄ █████████▀▀ ▄███▀ █████ █▀▀▀ █████ █████ ▄▄▄ ████ █████ █████ ▀▀ ████▀ █████ █████ █████▄ ▄█████ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀ ▀▀████████████████▀▀ ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ AVAILABLE 24/7 FRIENDLY SUPPORT ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄ ▄█▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀▀█▄ █▀▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▀█ █▀▀ ███████████████████ ▀▀█ █▀ ███████████████████████ ▀█ █▀ ███████████████▀▀ ███████ ▀█ ▄█▀ ██████████████▀ ▀█████ ▀█▄ ███ ███████████▀▀ ▀▀██ ███ ███ ███████▀▀ ███ ███ ▀▀▀▀ ███ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀ █▄ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █▄ ▀█████████▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▀▀█████ [ play & join our BIG COMMUNITY ] yahoo62278 Hero Member ***** Online Online Activity: 910 View Profile Personal Message (Online) Trust: 11: -0 / +2 Re: (No subject) « Sent to: tbearhere on: December 20, 2016, 06:22:35 AM » « You have forwarded or responded to this message. » Reply with quoteQuote ReplyReply Remove this messageDelete Whatever man, i tried explaining it to you and you refuse to try and understand. Enjoy your worthless account Report To Admin .BITSLER. ▄███ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄████▀ ▄██▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▄████▄ ▄████▄ ▀████▄ █████ ██████ ██████ █████ ▀████▄ ▀████▀ ▀████▀ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄▄████▀ ▀██████▀ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ THE FASTEST BTC DICE GAMES ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▄▄█▄▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▀▄▄ ▀█▀▀ ▄ ▀████ ▀▀▄ █ █▄ ▀▄ ▀████ ▀▀ ▄██▄ ▀▀▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▀▀ ▀▄▄ ▀████ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ █ █ ▄ ▀▄ ▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ ▄▄ ███ ▀██ █ ▀▀ █ █ ███ ▀██ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▄ █ ▀▀ █ ▀▀▄ ███▄ █ ▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▄ █ ▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ 0 CONFIRMATION INSTANT DEPOSIT ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄ ▄▄████████████████▄▄ ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄ ▄ ▄█████▀ ▀█████▄ ██▄▄ █████▀ ▄ ▀█████ ████████ ▄██ █████ ████████▄ ███▀ ████▄ █████████▀▀ ▄███▀ █████ █▀▀▀ █████ █████ ▄▄▄ ████ █████ █████ ▀▀ ████▀ █████ █████ █████▄ ▄█████ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀ ▀▀████████████████▀▀ ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████ AVAILABLE 24/7 FRIENDLY SUPPORT ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄ ▄█▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀▀█▄ █▀▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▀█ █▀▀ ███████████████████ ▀▀█ █▀ ███████████████████████ ▀█ █▀ ███████████████▀▀ ███████ ▀█ ▄█▀ ██████████████▀ ▀█████ ▀█▄ ███ ███████████▀▀ ▀▀██ ███ ███ ███████▀▀ ███ ███ ▀▀▀▀ ███ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀ █▄ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █▄ ▀█████████▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▀▀█████ [ play & join our BIG COMMUNITY ] yahoo62278 Hero Member ***** Online Onli Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 10:36:46 AM User Date Risked BTC amount Reference Comments
monbux 259: -0 / +26 2014-10-08 1.00000000 used him as escrow for sig campaign. very easy to work with and prompt services dabbs -2: -1 / +0 2015-03-30 0.08000000 Reference guy doesnt pay when tasks are completed racsas -2: -1 / +0 2015-03-31 0.02500000 Reference gave him a loan mid february and he has since disappeared. will remove if he comes back n pays loan with interest BTCBLOGGER -64: -6 / +0 2015-05-21 0.00000000 Reference promoting a ponzi eddiegarero -4: -2 / +0 2015-06-09 0.00000000 Reference another useless cloudmining scammer. be aware audriusss -8: -3 / +0 2015-08-05 0.00000000 trying to grab users for a paypal scam. be careful of this guy asmal -16: -4 / +0 2015-08-09 0.00000000 Reference posting malware/virus links Sweminer777 -32: -5 / +0 2015-09-18 0.00000000 Reference selling trust illegal do not deal with this user papajim -2: -1 / +0 2015-11-09 0.00000000 Reference trying to scam user for .6 selling domains 8675941 -4: -2 / +0 2015-11-13 0.00000000 Reference Making false claims. will remove if he can prove his claims of fixed tennis games magic max -1024: -10 / +0 2015-11-15 0.00000000 Reference newbie trying to provide escrow and providing fake vouches in his thread. DO NOT TRUST Glorantq -4: -2 / +0 2015-11-26 0.00000000 Reference Offering to pay to click referral never paid. Will remove of paid Gabriel25569 -2: -1 / +0 2015-12-18 0.00000000 Reference asking how to create ponzi be careful armour -16: -4 / +0 2015-12-19 0.00000000 Reference Very possible he scammed 1.2btc waiting to see how the situation turns out before I remove CoreTrust -8: -3 / +0 2015-12-21 0.00000000 Reference Self admitted scammer btc-mike 30: -0 / +3 2015-12-24 0.35000000 Sold me paypal for btc. fast quick trade kydranel -8: -3 / +0 2015-12-28 0.00000000 Reference scammed 35$ skrill from a user. use caution and an escrow when dealing with this guy errorcoin22 -2: -1 / +0 2015-12-28 0.00000000 Reference guy is just a pussy troll hiding behind an alt. not a scammer but a terrible person. Avoid the moron zazarb 44: -0 / +5 2016-01-10 0.50000000 Reference sent me paypal for my btc. I sent 1st. quick n easy sardasa 18: -0 / +2 2016-01-20 0.13300000 Bought his btc with my paypal. Fast n smooth trade worhiper_-_ -2: -1 / +0 2016-01-25 0.00000000 Reference this guy posts false accusations and is now lifetime banned forany campaign i manage iTeachYouLearn -16: -4 / +0 2016-02-02 0.00250000 Reference Stolen account. I provided this user a loan and was never repaid. I hadnt logged into acct since taking control and i look in seclog and see user requested pw change via email traveller159 -2: -1 / +0 2016-02-08 0.00000000 Reference promoting a ponzi doubler yellowcat1771 -8: -3 / +0 2016-02-11 0.00000000 Reference Hosted a fake giveaway. Trying to promote his site. Deal with caution essaouira82 -8: -3 / +0 2016-02-25 0.00000000 Reference reversed paypal trade sardasa 18: -0 / +2 2016-02-26 1.00000000 sold him 1btc for paypal i went 1st skeletonbit -8: -3 / +0 2016-04-21 0.00000000 Reference open scam accusation against this user. refusing to pay his workers nakedbitcoins -8: -3 / +0 2016-05-03 0.17000000 Reference Not paying signature campaign over 30 days late brazilcoins -8: -3 / +0 2016-06-02 0.00000000 Reference Offered to trade with user and he slanders my name. Terrible pr Arrakeen -2: -1 / +0 2016-06-23 0.00000000 Reference offering escrow services and possible bought acct KingofSwing -4: -2 / +0 2016-06-23 0.00500000 Reference selling method to earn btc that does not work. highly advise trading with user bapparabi -2: -1 / +0 2016-07-01 0.00000000 Reference Sig spammer. Will advise anyone whos adding him to their campaign to think twice pearl11 -2: -1 / +0 2016-07-10 0.00000000 Reference Sig spammer jayce 11: -0 / +2 2016-07-29 0.15000000 Reference Created sig designs for me in 24 hours Mongwapogi -4: -2 / +0 2016-08-03 0.00150000 Reference Tried cheating a twitter campaign saiha -2: -1 / +0 2016-08-04 0.00150000 Reference tried to cheat a twitter campaign s1ng -2: -1 / +0 2016-08-08 0.00150000 Reference Tried cheating a twitter campaign. Missed 2nd attempt but caught his 3rd LukaHR -2: -1 / +0 2016-08-12 0.00150000 Reference Tried cheating a twitter campaign. Claiming more then once PhilPrime -2: -1 / +0 2016-08-27 0.04000000 Reference Cheating a sig campaign by using multiple account. Palodar -2: -1 / +0 2016-08-27 0.04000000 Reference Cheating sig campaign using multiple accts Omegasun -4: -2 / +0 2016-08-28 0.30000000 Reference Cheated xaurum sig campaign with this acct and alt philprime htccoindev -2: -1 / +0 2016-08-28 0.00000000 Reference trying to scam users with htc coins. Showing pic which could be faked n wanting users to send large amounts of btc 1st Xubu -2: -1 / +0 2016-08-28 0.00000000 Reference trying to buy fake trust CardShark659 4: -0 / +1 2016-08-29 0.00000000 Know this user from another forum hes a mod at pokerowned.com good guy but poker degen neo666 4: -0 / +1 2016-08-30 0.00000000 mistakenly sent this user some xaur and he returned it CrackedLogic 0: -0 / +0 2016-09-02 0.00000000 Reference Account sold. Baryom 3: -0 / +1 2016-09-16 0.00000000 Reference I manage his signature campaign for bitsler website. One of a very few campaigns i didnt have use escrow for user payments. Has always paid participants weekly within a few hours of me submitting payment sheet gilang -2: -1 / +0 2016-09-28 0.00040000 Reference Caught trying to cheat twitter campaign YTBitcoin -2: -1 / +0 2016-10-16 0.01500000 Reference User failed to qualify for payment of sig campaign i managed. Then decides to be a total dick about it. His own fault for not qualifying. I urge other managers to not hire this guy for your campaigns Osarman -4: -2 / +0 2016-10-24 0.00000000 Sig spammer abhishek.g -8: -3 / +0 2016-11-22 0.00000000 Completely incompetent user. Hassles managers and isnt worth the trouble. WIll not be allowed in campaigns i manage issie81 -16: -4 / +0 2016-12-09 0.00000000 Reference Hacked acct accusation. Will remove when resolved Ineedhfaccs -2: -1 / +0 2016-12-13 0.00000000 Reference Buying reputation points for a different forum. Shady user devthedev 140: -0 / +14 2016-12-13 0.00000000 Reference completed an article for bitdouble YTBitcoin -2: -1 / +0 2016-12-16 0.00000000 Reference User spreads FUD in an attempt to get his way. Very disrespectful and showing bad character. tbearhere -2: -1 / +0 2016-12-19 0.00000000 User leaves false feedback when they failed to complete sig campaign requirements. ImHash 0: -0 / +0 2016-12-21 0.00000000 Reference User does not like to accept managers decisions and is a total pain in the ass, Do not hire or work with this guy, waste of your time. Changed to neutral for now reserve the right to change back to neg kikiyo -2: -1 / +0 2016-12-21 0.00000000 Reference Cheating xaurum campaign clickerz -2: -1 / +0 2016-12-21 0.00000000 Reference Cheating xaurum campaign alt of kikiyo Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 10:38:58 AM @yahoo62278
I took the negative trusts off.... for now. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: yahoo62278 on December 21, 2016, 10:58:04 AM You can do whatever you want man. I verify i sent those PMs if ppl can read them. I thought this user was only complaining about 1 week of no pay when he 1st messaged me but it was for 3 weeks. Its still the same though and the spreadsheet is public. Anyone is free to look at his posts and see he was treated fairly and did not qualify.
@tbearhere it doesnt matter if you removed the neg trust or not. The fact is you put it there for no reason in the 1st place and youre still acting like a child with all the previous posts. Go take a course in how to be an adult then get back with me Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: Lauda on December 21, 2016, 04:01:11 PM @yahoo62278 Looks like it. I took the no trust off...He will be contacting you.Need I get an international lawyer ? To solve this false accusations? 5) result is: you are a newbie here and have zer information about bitcointalk forum. It doesn't surprise me quite frankly. It is probably just one of the reasons for which account sales should be banned and tagged on sight. Newbies need to work their way up, just like any reasonable user did (as one acquires certain knowledge along the way).6) Moral: Surf the forum properly first. Before joining any campaign (actually before buying account) Posting those private messages, or that list of trust ratings (?) from somewhere was pointless. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 04:49:59 PM You can do whatever you want man. I verify i sent those PMs if ppl can read them. I thought this user was only complaining about 1 week of no pay when he 1st messaged me but it was for 3 weeks. Its still the same though and the spreadsheet is public. Anyone is free to look at his posts and see he was treated fairly and did not qualify. You can put anything you want on that falsely I can't. @tbearhere it doesnt matter if you removed the neg trust or not. The fact is you put it there for no reason in the 1st place and youre still acting like a child with all the previous posts. Go take a course in how to be an adult then get back with me Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 04:54:31 PM @yahoo62278 Looks like it. I took the no trust off...He will be contacting you.Need I get an international lawyer ? To solve this false accusations? 5) result is: you are a newbie here and have zer information about bitcointalk forum. It doesn't surprise me quite frankly. It is probably just one of the reasons for which account sales should be banned and tagged on sight. Newbies need to work their way up, just like any reasonable user did (as one acquires certain knowledge along the way).6) Moral: Surf the forum properly first. Before joining any campaign (actually before buying account) Posting those private messages, or that list of trust ratings (?) from somewhere was pointless. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 05:06:11 PM Just ignore him/her. It's just another random spammer that is unable to read, understand and follow the campaign rules. And a bought/sold high ranked account should suddenly turn into newbie. Because it actually become newbie. I'm pretty much sure that is a bought account.Back when I used to manage campaigns, there were a lot of users that lacked a single posts to receive payments for those periods but even though I felt sorry for them, I had no choice to deny them and what you've done in this case is completely correct and based on the campaign rules itself. That's the only correct way handle something like that. Rules are rules, and should be bent by no one and for no one.Not sure why a lot of "Legendary" members don't follow, read and understand rules and it's very annoying (given that they've been here the longest). This is why an activity based system is misleading and wrong. People should either only selectively get 'promoted' to such a rank or selectively get demoted based on their actions/knowledge.And I usually talk here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=826901.new#new On the sp ccminer link I contribute alot to sp for his builds. They nick named me the double poster sometimes because I quote myself because people sometimes don't read back in the thread. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: darklus123 on December 21, 2016, 06:19:48 PM This is really the main reason why i also do wanted to end the trust system. According to lauda admins should only select who ever gets promoted i would have to disagree with that one instead i would like that DT should be moderated(my idea is that there should be a moderator that will testify about tagging a certain user)
Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: Lauda on December 21, 2016, 06:23:03 PM I double quoted myself for a reason. Sorry. And I'm not a newbie. Thank you. Then I do not understand why you are constantly breaking the rules with consecutive posts, if you're not a newbie.This is really the main reason why i also do wanted to end the trust system. Until you are able to propose a better system, it will and should stay. According to lauda admins should only select who ever gets promoted i would have to disagree with that one instead i would like that DT should be moderated(my idea is that there should be a moderator that will testify about tagging a certain user) My suggestion has nothing to do with DT. It's about user ranks.Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: darklus123 on December 21, 2016, 06:31:40 PM Until you are able to propose a better system, it will and should stay. As i have stated above i want it to be moderated like during the tagging there should be a moderator who hereby witnessed. That does sound better IMO tho. My suggestion has nothing to do with DT. It's about user ranks. Yup, that is why i said that i would disagree with you on that terms. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: Lauda on December 21, 2016, 06:43:34 PM As i have stated above i want it to be moderated like during the tagging there should be a moderator who hereby witnessed. That does sound better IMO tho. Some flaws:1) Unfeasible without another whole group of staff members (problems on it's own: Who to pick? How to finance them? et al.). 2) Prone to corruption. 3) Prone to abuse. 2-3 is what the current group is susceptible to (however, with rating negation, exclusions and simple removals it is less so). A moderator 'witnessing' a trust rating makes said trust rating no more valid, then DT1/DT2 members witnessing it. It's actually better to have a plethora of people be able to review and act upon it. Yup, that is why i said that i would disagree with you on that terms. This actually indirectly supports account sales, farming and all kinds of other nonsense. However, we should not be discussing this separately within this thread as we would move away from the topic. Do you not agree on this negative rating to the user in question or? Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: darklus123 on December 21, 2016, 06:55:02 PM Some flaws: 1) Unfeasible without another whole group of staff members (problems on it's own: Who to pick? How to finance them? et al.). 2) Prone to corruption. 3) Prone to abuse. 2-3 is what the current group is susceptible to (however, with rating negation, exclusions and simple removals it is less so). A moderator 'witnessing' a trust rating makes said trust rating no more valid, then DT1/DT2 members witnessing it. It's actually better to have a plethora of people be able to review and act upon it. Abuse already is happening anyways, this may also lead to corruption but for me this is not about how are we going to eliminate corruption yet to lessen those, Quote It's actually better to have a plethora of people be able to review and act upon it. then that may sound much better~snip Do you not agree on this negative rating to the user in question or? Yup, I definitely disagree that OP is given a negative trust when doing its job (that's sounds not fair IMO) Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 07:13:16 PM I double quoted myself for a reason. Sorry. And I'm not a newbie. Thank you. Then I do not understand why you are constantly breaking the rules with consecutive posts, if you're not a newbie.This is really the main reason why i also do wanted to end the trust system. Until you are able to propose a better system, it will and should stay. According to lauda admins should only select who ever gets promoted i would have to disagree with that one instead i would like that DT should be moderated(my idea is that there should be a moderator that will testify about tagging a certain user) My suggestion has nothing to do with DT. It's about user ranks.Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: royalfestus on December 21, 2016, 07:27:16 PM I am the least ranked to make any comment on this thread but I like to say I am part of the byteball campaign and was also not paid last week, and I dont deserve to be paid. I struggled to make enough posts because achow gave me some advice when I seek him, to make better post so as to improve.Then I was making more post but need to improve, my post wasnt this whack either. Gave me advice on the choice of thread to post, sensible ones and not long commented threads.Avoid wordy statements that can look spammy. I should make more posts also bitcoin discussion threads.Sincerely yahoo62278 is not that insensitive as people say, Just abiding by the rules. This week I got my pay without excuses/complain. Rank does not qualify one to break the rule.
Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 07:36:20 PM Not that i need to justify my trust to this user but i do want to prove a point or 2 with this thread. User tbearhere was in the byteball campaign for a few weeks. He failed to qualify for any of the weeks of participation in this campaign. That wouldve been around 12/13 when i did the post counts. 5 days later this guy decides to give me a little color in my profile.(im ok with it and im not posting this to cry) It's funny that you look so hard for some shorter posts and not my higher quality posts.https://i.imgur.com/0ex72EC.png Now, i know trust isnt moderated and im not asking anyone to remove this. I just want to show this user and you the community hes a vindictive piece of work and you should avoid him if trading or adding him to a sig campaign. Upon seeing this feedback i went back over the spreadsheet to see what notes i had on the guy and find the reason he may have tagged me. Mistakes happen im human, so i decided to have a look. Heres the notes i had for him. https://i.imgur.com/geR1GGh.png Now, the rules for that campaign state a user needs 30 qualifying posts in the week to qualify for payment. Obv he had 26 posts falling short of the goal. If you take a look at the quality that week(dec 6th-12th) youll see https://i.imgur.com/3C6GKEs.png https://i.imgur.com/uqFwQOc.png https://i.imgur.com/gv7YMmY.png https://i.imgur.com/tshS1fO.png I could go on but you get the point. This is another 5-6 posts of his 26 he would not have gotten credit for. Also if youll notice most if not all of these comments were in the same damn thread. This is the same for the previous weeks he was in campaign as well. Apparently he feels like he is owed pay for that week i guess. All im saying is this is not constructive posting and this will not get you paid. If you dont do as this guy wants he obv gets all righteous and tags ya so id steer clear of the guy if you have any sense. (by steer clear i dont mean be afraid. just dont do business with him or have him in your campaigns) And again that 0 is something you left alone, it's not a meter so you could put anything you want. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 07:53:33 PM I am the least ranked to make any comment on this thread but I like to say I am part of the byteball campaign and was also not paid last week, and I dont deserve to be paid. I struggled to make enough posts because achow gave me some advice when I seek him, to make better post so as to improve.Then I was making more post but need to improve, my post wasnt this whack either. Gave me advice on the choice of thread to post, sensible ones and not long commented threads.Avoid wordy statements that can look spammy. I should make more posts also bitcoin discussion threads.Sincerely yahoo62278 is not that insensitive as people say, Just abiding by the rules. This week I got my pay without excuses/complain. Rank does not qualify one to break the rule. Now see that's a good quality post. It's not about rank or breaking the rules on my part. It's about him not paying me for 2 of 3 weeks. It about him breaking the rules of not paying me. Just look at his trust ratings by clicking on the trust under his name. You will see so many people got scammed by him. Thank You. :)As far as I'm concerned, I'll take that negative trust rating off as soon as he takes it off me. I really don't care that much about a negative trust on me because everyone on the threads I'm on knows me and I make donations and do so little trading. Thank You. :) Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: Lauda on December 21, 2016, 08:02:29 PM Now see that's a good quality post. It's not about rank or breaking the rules on my part. You didn't meet the minimum required number of qualifying posts.It's about him not paying me for 2 of 3 weeks. It about him breaking the rules of not paying me. That is not a rule of any kind, and he does not have to pay you if you weren't doing your "job" properly.Just look at his trust ratings by clicking on the trust under his name. You will see so many people got scammed by him. Thank You. :) Wrong. I do not see a single valid negative rating from anyone who doesn't have at least 1 negative rating themselves. All I see is just a bunch of whining users. As far as I'm concerned, I'll take that negative trust rating off as soon as he takes it off me. Extortion? Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: tbearhere on December 21, 2016, 08:43:45 PM Now see that's a good quality post. It's not about rank or breaking the rules on my part. You didn't meet the minimum required number of qualifying posts.It's about him not paying me for 2 of 3 weeks. It about him breaking the rules of not paying me. That is not a rule of any kind, and he does not have to pay you if you weren't doing your "job" properly.Just look at his trust ratings by clicking on the trust under his name. You will see so many people got scammed by him. Thank You. :) Wrong. I do not see a single valid negative rating from anyone who doesn't have at least 1 negative rating themselves. All I see is just a bunch of whining users. As far as I'm concerned, I'll take that negative trust rating off as soon as he takes it off me. Extortion? And why are you defending him so much and not me. Look at his background. Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: SFR10 on December 21, 2016, 09:14:00 PM Just look at his trust ratings by clicking on the trust under his name. You will see so many people got scammed by him. Thank You. :) Clearly your mixing his "Sent feedback" with his "received feedback" since you copy pasted his sent feedback (as if those feedback's are for his account): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1722426.msg17251550#msg17251550 and http://archive.is/aJoZQ (#16)Here's a simple tutorial: https://i.imgur.com/xveSgsG.jpg As far as I'm concerned, I'll take that negative trust rating off as soon as he takes it off me. You're the one who left the negative rating first, so have the decency to delete it first. The more time you waste for getting into yahoo62278's head, the lesser chance you get for getting the negative rating down.Nope thief on his part yahoo. Nope, it's you failing to read the campaign rules and obeying them.And why are you defending him so much and not me. Look at his background. His (were) defending him since his correct and you're wrong. Again please read the above screenshot I made so you could actually know about his background.Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: freebutcaged on December 23, 2016, 02:35:51 PM Are DT members leaving feed back comments only on members they have traded with and dealt with or if someone asks them to be a judge in a situation they give negative trust if the case is legit? since only DT feed back comments shows whether red or be it green.
Title: Re: tbearhere community reaction Post by: Lauda on December 23, 2016, 02:40:06 PM Are DT members leaving feed back comments only on members they have traded with and dealt with or if someone asks them to be a judge in a situation they give negative trust if the case is legit? You don't have to have a single trade with anyone to leave them a rating. The system is a web of trust, not a web of trades. |
