Bitcoin Forum

Satoshi Nakamoto is some where around and watching the Bitcoin Community from the shadow.
Ask Satoshi any questions in this thread ? Deffinitely Satoshi will answer all your questions.

_______________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________

Satoshi just answered a bunch of questions.

Let me know if you have more. :)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=317658.new#new

Nobody in the world knows who is behind the name Satoshi Nakamoto. And I doubt that he would look this thread to answer on question of ordinary users. but in the case if I would have an opportunity to ask him I would ask - If he worked for the government when created bitcoin and blockchain?

Your wrting sound like you know Satoshi very well; Are you a Knights of Satoshi ?

I will ask Satoshi one question, how u predicted that its better to hide in shadow that be exposed as creator of this brillant invention?
It was very hard, to not take all this glory but in same time avoid so many legal and not legal problems.

Hahaha.  

I've got my application in.  Always wanted to be me a knight.  Wasn't sure they still existed these days.  :)

You are wrong. Many people know Satoshi Nakamoto very well. I can guantee you, Satoshi will read every question in this thread.
Answer to your question is,  Satoshi Nakamoto the inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology did not work for any government.

I see what you did there.  ;)

He did not hide but was Pseudonymous. He does not need any grory for his invention. He has done nothing illegal by inventing Bitcoin and Blockchain.
 

  No you are wrong. You have no idea.

Why the Times in the genesis block; and was it a real freshly printed copy?

Satoshi, when are you gonna set everybody straight with the extraordinary proof you promised.  I know you got it.  :)

No, the Genesis Block #0 was mined in May 2007. It was rearranged. 

Your assumtion is wrong.  Satoshi Nakamoto never promissed any extra ordinary proof.
Extra ordinary claim does require extraordinary proof but it requires genuine proof with concrete evidence.
But Satoshi will come out of the shadiow soon.

Thanks.

There go five minutes of my life that I'll never get back.

Are you even Japanese  ???

Knight Hood is still exit in this modern time in a new name.

Is SPV broken in your opinion and can you fix it?

Satoshi, what's your take on the Blockstream/Core roadmap:  Segwit, SideChains, LN, etc?  

And can you guys ever reach a compromise or should we start thinking about 2 Bitcoin chains?  Thx.

~CfA~

I genuinely wanna know what that is. 

My first question is :

Are you really Craig Wright? Since all the news and events most likely points to Craig, there is a big possibility that he is, but we need a confirmation :)

Second question since it is debated already for a long time : What will you do with your BTC you mined? Some suggest that you destroyed it. Its closed to a billion dollar already at current price.


reference:

https://news.bitcoin.com/theymos-bitcoins-satoshi-destroyed/

Will he? And will it be the original satoshi...or just the person who most recently purchased the satoshi credentials?

Please keep in mind, they are more valuable in the shadows.

But do whatever you'd like with your newfound glory...you paid for it.

Also, Vlad...the riddles turned out fantastic. Thank you.

Ah thanks for giving me this opportunity.
I would like to ask Satoshi why he preferred to stay anonymous and what good did your anonymity do to bitcoin or to you?

Who is Satoshi? Well, it ain't you.

Having read many of Satoshi's posts, the use of grammar; and the effortless and causal use / command of the Queen's English is a style that is difficult to replicate. You can have the highest levels of education, but unless you were brought up immersed in the English language you would slip up all too often.

But three times in one post?


Your assumption is wrong. Satoshi Nakamoto never promised any proof.


Extra ordinary claims do require extraordinary proof; but also proof with concrete evidence.


But Satoshi will come out of the shadows soon.


I ain't all that with my own grammar, but you get the gist of where I'm coming from. Even Dr. Wright would have done a better job.

First,  I am not Craig Wright. Craig is one of the good drama artist. You all know that Bitcoin Drama is a real life drama in real time in the real world stage. The Stage is open for any one to act as they wish. You are also acting here. Second, 19700 Blocks = 985000 BTC. Satoshi will tell the mystery soon. Be patience to hear about those BTC. First you need to know who is Shatoshi Nakamoto ?

 You  speak like Pinky. You know that Satoshi Nakamoto is not an English or Australo-Merican. You know that,
こんにちは
私は中本哲史午前
私は双子の兄弟を持っています
Therefore, Think and think again.






 

Satoshi has remained anonymous for long time because it was needed. The reason will be unfolded gradually. 

But how will you know that the person that will answer on your questions is really the real Satoshi Nakamoto, there would be a bunch of users here that would definitely going to answer your questions but it is impossible to know if it is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. It is easy to say for someone that he is Satoshi Nakamoto but would be a hard thing to believe in the first place.

will it now?

My question is:

Why did you leave us hanging? If you really believe in your creation you should stand by its side and finish it so all this fuss about scaling and everything will end.

There are over 18 people become candidate of Satoshi Nakamoto; No body claimed that he is
Satoshi except Double Dr.Dr. Craig Wright. But Craig Wright hesitantly told Rory,  eeeeeYeeeees !
I was the main----,  but he could not say, Yes ! I am Satoshi Nakamoto; I invented the Bitcoin and
Blockchain Technology. He was quick groomed. Psychologically he was not prepared to act properly.
Because if aVman try to become an impostor of some one else behalf is not easy job. Very hard.
Which Satoshi do you want to meet or know ? The genuine inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain or a  develioper? 


私は聡です

Yes !

Do you understand how compartmentalization works?

In order to have a whole made up of more than a single part, you have to have multiple pieces.

The original Satoshi was merely playing his part in perpetuating an idea.

There is only 1 candidate for Satoshi. and many wannabe's.

Satoshi is saying, "I never left you. There was a technical problem."

I feel no need too many questions about it, because from the beginning, Satoshi was deliberately not taking the primary identity. If from beginning Satoshi appear to public. Bitcoin will not be decentralized, because it will be concentrated in groups such as google & apple.

I still think that Satoshi just a manequin. This is precisely what makes bitcoin became popular in the world. All who answer our question in this forum is the embodiment of Satoshi, because bitcoin be great because of influence of community and market.

I guess it's alright to dream and pretend to be something you're not.

And even better to be happy.

And if you have to buy that happiness...it's kinda sad, but so be it.

The best experiences you'll have are ones that you achieve...and work towards.

Successes that you've made.

Not sad little impromptu dances in the parking lot.

Satoshi is saying, he had 52 projects in relation to Bitcoin and Blockchain. It was heard for one individual to implement every things. Satoshi had to play a role as, "we".

Satoshi ain't saying shit.  ;D

Maybe it's time for you to start taking the medicine again.

The success that we wish for is a paradigm of inteded ations for which we are held to be responsible.

You know, it used to be about cows...but a few years have come and gone.

It's about goats now.

And even if for some reason the 5 goats make it up the hill to the small playground which hides their fancy treats.

They still die at the end.

Five, Seven, Twenty Six, One, Nineteen.

Yhrtrd s [syyrtm jrtr///upi kidy jsbr yp gomf oy/

Listen Pinky ! Go and watch the cartoon called Pinky and the Brain, then wacht Gremlins, then watch Matrix. There after your inner mind's eye will open. Then you will become a Prophet. Thou shall be able to foresee the future. It is not good to insault any one.
"As you sow so shall you reap." in three days. 

And thus sayeth he who came after.

After the moment, too late to shine.

Five goats free to wander this life.

An envy of thee, thou and thine.


But what is that in the distance?

A mirage of sorts to behold?

I could trust all the things you say...but first you'd have to take a little more of your daily medication as the doctor prescribed it...

I think it takes a few days to kick in.

What's the key factor that driven you towards the creation of such an innovative technology, when people were thinking of several other inventions. The better part is the implementation of the technology in all sectors, which makes it an innovation which has got endless value.

I believe that Satoshi was not a group of people but a gifted individual so in my opinion is very likely that he has moved on to other projects and has started something more stimulating for his genius mind.

I will ask him why is the blocksize limited and why did he not create a clock that detects or sense when the blocksize needs to increase. That is the reason why the transactions is slow because nakamoto did not foresee it coming. Bitcoin would have been more reliable and easy to do transactions.

these threads always remind me of a statue I once saw at Shibuya train station.


good old faithful Hachikō...

i don't want to ask about bitcoin but i want to ask about i want to meet him and ask him to drink coffee with me and talk about the other that not related with bitcoin or other crypto currency? i think he is a busy person that have much of activity in outside and if we talk about bitcoin then maybe he don't want to answer so better i ask another question.

What is your take on the Scaling solution been proposed by different factions, Bitcoin Unlimited for hard fork and Bitcoin Core for soft fork.

satoshi is binladen  ;D

So you're saying that Dr. Wright was one of the main developers of Bitcoin but not Satoshi?  How big of a role did he have?  Does he know who the real Satoshi is?  Cause I've read your posts and it sounds like Satoshi was/is AI. 

The name Satoshi was an accidental discovery derived from a Japanese company that had already started to use but then abandoned the name Bitcoin.

Try harder.

if i could contact Satoshi Nakamoto i would beg him to sign a message and tell everyone publicly that he will never reveal his identity and he never intended to do so.
maybe that way, it can finally put an stop to all these nonsense topics about Satoshi, who he might be, ...

The opposite is true, people will always speculate until Satoshi is found.  I say sign a message and move a mountain or two if necessary to get it over with then we can move on with the revolution. 

I am not saying that Dr. Craiog Wright was one of the main developer but I said that he said to Rory that he was the main. While he has mentioned about the 'Tulip' and the 'Super Computer' it indicate to me that he probably had a connection to Wei Dai. He does not know real Satoshi but he thinks, that David Kleiman was Satoshi and he is dead; This is why he cited in his blog Satoshi is dead. But Satoshi Nakamoto is not dead neither his twin brother. Many people thought Harold Finney could be Satoshi and he is sleeping for long time as a dead man. Satoshi Nakamoto is preparing to launch his next project.

I would like to ask Satoshi one question. Which altcoin, from his point of view, is the second best to Bitcoin? For I think he can answer that question better than anyone else can.

In reality blocksize is limited for a predetermined time period. Blocksize could be increase without breaking the rules. With new sets of Algorithm added to the old. Satoshi is busy with unlimited data structure and multifeatures transaction mechanism.

I had seen hundreds of Satoshi who wear us mask and pay money to advertiser and come as satoshi so I don't want to meet the next fake satoshi and satoshi is now not a simple man he is multi-billionaire n may that's why he is hiding his identity because its not actually the legal path to becoming richest man.

Creating and mining Bitcoin is not illegal or we'd all be in prison. 

"Nobody"? I bet you're wrong, there must be some people know about him. At least 2 or 3 people must be know about Satoshi Nakamoto real identity, if there's no one knows about him then Satoshi Nakamoti wouldn't exist. Cuz what about Satoshi Nakamoti himself? He must knows about himself.

Now Satoshi has got a technical problem and  he won't sign the message with the Private Key of Genesis Block or Bitcoin  Block #1 to Block #197000. Suppose a man claim that he is 'Jesus Christ' the messiah the Pope will say that he won't believe unless the candidate  of Jesus Christ resurect another Lazarus from the dead. Or he must be able to wank on the water and make the wine out of water. So is the case
of Satoshi Nakamoto. Who do you think Satoshi Nakamoto is ? Is he Bitcoin Jesus or Bitcoin Moses ?  The nonsense speculation is is an important matter. It is needed for the market  developement strategic puroposes only.

Satoshi Nakamoto is reading this thread diligently. Ask Satoshi Any Question ?

Satoshi Nakamoto will publish the 'Official Deffinition Paper of Bitcoin' soon. The governments and the central bankers will get the correct understanding accurately.

Soon you will meet Satoshi.

If Satoshi can't sign those early blocks, due to a technical problem, can he at least move a large chunk of those early coins?  Cause if not, then I really don't see anyone believing that he is Satoshi.   

As for what I think, I think Satoshi is Dr. Wright.  Hopefully we'll find out soon. 

So Satoshi has a twin brother?  Can you give any hints about who that is?  The suspense is killing me.   lol

That is a confidential matter. If you want to know about the confidential things you have to be invited in, to know the truth.

don't tell me, it's IXCoin  ::)

...and the plot thickens .. ;D

Seriously, there are more questions to Satoshi when he comes out than an answers. There more people already claims or leads but still theres no confirmations yet who is the real Satoshi nakamoto. Hope his account here will one day be activated and finally posts here to clear the issue. (Hope he can still remember his password or his account is nit hack lol)

as if he's going to make some time to open this thread for sure he is very busy right at this moment and I don't think that this would be the place that he going to ask some questions about him, and his invention which is bitcoin .

i wonder if you expect that this coin will be like this

The truth is what I always seek.  I'll be searching for that gate to the truth.  :)

IamNotAnonymous, Are you using google translate for your Japanese? 

Your Nakamoto Satoshi actually traslates to Nakamoto Tetsushi.  The character order is incorrect.

A better post text signature would have been:

わたしの前には中本諭がいます。
Watashi no mae ni wa Nakamoto Satoshi ga imasu.

kon'nichiwa !

Watatashi wa Satoshideshu.

Watashi wa nihonjinde wa arimasen.
Watashi wa, jikan ryoko-shadeshu.
Wtashi wa anata no mirai kar kimashita.
Wtashi wa robbotodeshu.
watashi wa hitorijanai.

Satoshi nin'i no shitshumon ?
Wareware wa Satoshideshu !

satoshi

This is sound like the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
Hello, I want to ask Satoshi one question?
When are you going to reveal your true identity?

"IamNotAnonymous" - well, you're really weird. Do you at least have some technical understanding of Bitcoin itself?

Satoshi Nakamoto does not need to reveal his true identity but for some
reason he will reveal himself first to the Bitcoin community leaders to analyse,
if it is good to reveal his true identity.

Are you an ass or tits man?

Hi adam440,
You could say what ever you wish bu I am not annoyed; Bitcoin did not fell from the space or grew ot of tree. Bitcoin Network requires technical understanding. Bitcoin is a electronic digital cash system. Bitcoin is mined with algorithm and stored in Coinbase and make transaction using Blockchain data structure which is a public ledger in the Bitcoin Network.  

I'd ask him to spend 1000BTC to run a few hundreds full nodes to help the poor low fee bas*ards :D

BTW, @coins101 stop using bitmixer signature design dude wtf man?

I don't speak Japanese, I was cheating.  And being annoying.   :)

Can you specify which leaders?  Core?  Miners?  Etc...

Also, what kind of proof if the coins are locked up in a fund and you said Satoshi cannot sign any of the first 197,000 blocks?  Thx. 

Can't believe how many people are humoring this attention whoring troll.

OP is NOT Satoshi

OP IS a phaggot

Not all people will show their faces in front of the camera and tell that you have invented it. Many inventors in our world is still anonymous and they like to keep their private lives unto themselves. They enjoy having their life in peace without flashing cameras and long interviews. It is not how you gain the glory but how you enjoy looking at people how happy they were with your invention.

Don't be an Ass. 

At the very least OP knows Satoshi and Bitcoin intimately.  That alone is worth the opportunity.

Everybody know that he hides his indenture and it wasn't even proved that he is Japanese, even his name sounds so.
I would ask just one question - how this idea about bitcoin came to him?

Can you find the private key from a signed public key?

Noup  :)

Well some professional cryptographic experts think there are circumstances where you can. But I want to hear the Satoshi answer.

I am not sure if he will read this or not but I would like to thank him for such invention. I mean it’s really beneficial for us (the international traders) to deal and manage payment online without any hectic restrictions, limitations or paperwork. Even if we are not in the mainstream fund mobilisation industry, I am sure in the coming 20 years, bitcoin will be one of the major players in the world payment solution (especially on the international level).

well, I guess it doesn't matter if we ask Mr.Nakamoto Satoshi. because He still not gonna response to any of the member here. And were not so sure also if He will know about this things. due to everything about him was still a speculation, no one knows who is he. Or only my question if He/She exist is "why did you hide your identity Mr. Satoshi nakamoto"

Satoshi Nakamoto is saying," I planned to do the work pseudonymously but there an unexpected event occured and I had to move on to other projects. I did not hide myself according to my own will but it was needed. Some thing went wrong, and I have turned the wrong in to right with my pre-planned and  determined aspiration by magic. Virtually I never left you at all, because I never was with you. I was doing my job according to the master plan. I wish, I could tell the truth in plain language but the time has not come yet. There was a twist in the beginning just after the Eureka Moment of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology. I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?"
  

Err, what are you smoking?

@vlad

Why has this thread been moved to 'off topic'?

Surely Satoshi answering questions about his creation should be both on topic and pinned to the front page of, well, EVERYTHING

I invented Bitcoin for a purpose and that purpose is in this three words, "Care and Share" that was the Bitcoin Motto.

Bitcoin is not an acronym as you said, BitCoin= Bribes Illegal Transactions Criminal Operations International Narcotics. This is wrong.  Bitcoin is Bit+Coin= Bitcoin. A form of peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Uhmmm, ok, this guy  is actually talking to Satoshi cause that's pretty much what Satoshi told me today (except for the magic thing).  I'll expand on it in that he also said that he has been working on the next level of crypto.  "Using the same Legos but to build something different."  Something he plans to launch soon.

T H E Y M O S!!!

Bitcoin's motto was Care and Share?  Wow, I never knew that and I never saw that motto being exercised by the Bitcoin elite.  It was more like HOARD and HODL.

If I was Satoshi I wouldn't tell anyone.



Question for Satoshi: How much BTC do you hold?

The Real Satoshi Nakamoto mined 985000 BTC. His Twin Brother got a lots of BTC.

You're driving me crazy with his twin brother.  Who is it?

You realize war is about to break out?  Time to give up the truth if you got it, brother. 

Satoshi (Dr. Wright) says: 

No, equal is NOT fair.  We can have :

A) Equally poor

B) Wealthy societies that are unequal through growth

Growth makes all people better. It is not inequality that we need to address, but growth. Volatility is a low price to pay for high growth. Research compound interest - growth is the answer to all poverty problems.

Satoshi [Dr. Wright] says:

If the ephemeral key (k) has been reused in the signing of multiple keys or has a poorly designed RNG this is possible. The SN keys are public and block 9 was used in a transaction that leaves the Public Key visible and not just the Key hash.

http://www.nilsschneider.net/2013/01/28/recovering-bitcoin-private-keys.html


Now, where a bitcoin address has not been used in the signing and movement of coin, the double hash of the public key does actually make the pubkey value secret and not able to be discovered (prior to use or other leakage).

The recovery of keys using a quantum computer is not possible in the near term and even was a 1,000,000 Qubit system developed, it would require months (or longer) of compute time.

There is a LOT of FUD around QC and cryptography. There is NO threat in the near term, and in contradiction to what is stated by many (using this as a reason to try to move to other protocols and away from the reference protocol), QC is not a means to suddenly crack ECDSA keys.

The following is the response from one of the scientists quoted by the Economist a few years back that lead to this BS:

Your article regarding D-Wave's demonstration of a "practical quantum computer", sets a new standard for sloppy science journalism. Most egregious is your assertion that quantum computers can solve NP-complete problems in "one shot" by exploring exponentially many solutions at once. This mistaken view was put to rest in the infancy of quantum computation over a decade ago when it was established that the axioms of quantum physics severely restrict the type of information accessible during a measurement. For unstructured search problems like the NP-complete problems this means that there is no exponential speed up but rather at most a quadratic speed up.

Your assertions about D-Wave are equally specious. A 16 qubit quantum computer has smaller processing power than a cell phone and hardly represents a practical breakthrough. Any claims about D-Wave's accomplishments must therefore rest on their ability to increase the number of qubits by a couple of orders of magnitude while maintaining the fragile quantum states of the qubits. Unfortunately D-Wave, by their own admission, have not even tested whether the qubits in their current implementation are in a coherent quantum state. So it quite a stretch to assert that they have a working quantum computer let alone one that potentially scales. An even bleaker picture emerges when one more closely examines their algorithmic approach. Their claimed speed up over classical algorithms appears to be based on a misunderstanding of a paper my colleagues van Dam, Mosca and I wrote on "The power of adiabatic quantum computing". That speed up unfortunately does not hold in the setting at hand, and therefore D-Wave's "quantum computer" even if it turns out to be a true quantum computer, and even if it can be scaled to thousands of qubits, would likely not be more powerful than a cell phone.

Umesh Vazirani

IF and I mean IF a 1 million QBit computer is made in my life time and this is a big if (equal to winning the lottery for the next 20 days without buying a ticket) then it will AT BEST take months if not decades to solve ECC.

Bitcoin addresses would need to have a system that can break ECC is seconds.

Such a system is NOT even theoretically possible.

So, please never listen to the FUD. Forget ideas such as Lamport Signatures. Bitcoin is as it is for a reason and the reason that these others who worry about science fiction did not create it is the reason we need to maintain it as the protocol was created.

It needs to be simple.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/theinbox/2007/02/quantum_computing_3

Edit:  Quantum computing is even less effective on the solutions to hashes.

The trouble that seems to be misunderstood is that a working Quantum computer cannot take an ECDSA signature and reverse this in a single operation as is proposed. All of the QC algorithms are multistep and multistage. The system needs to be reset following each process used in the calculation of a valid ECDSA Signature. This is not something akin to the existing methods used in computer science now.

We have current issues, thinking of possibilities out of theory 20 years hence is the least of the issues we face.

Edit 2:  [oh, I can't get Satoshi to stop once he gets going]:  

Just as a further edit:

http://www.nature.com/articles/npjqi201523

In the Nature article, the talk of how a Billion Qbit quantum computer "could" possibly solve a 2000bit RSA key in a day.

This is still far smaller than a 256 Bit ECC based cryptosystem. The result is that the current research support the position I took in 2007. It is a shame we simply trust others to tell us what is true authoritatively rather than seeking the answers in a scientific manner.

@Satoshi: Boxers or briefs?

Heavenly father, Jehovah, please make it be briefs? Amen.

The real Satoshi says: 

Do I have to choose?

It's a package deal, never sell yourself short. 

@Satoshi: How do you like this song?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEQ2nPSL5-0

What a thing to say.  I like you. 

https://i.imgur.com/ijQ4Avx.jpg
"Oh, my fuckin God! And we just convinced Thee to purchase some IXCoins so to be doled out at the next Angels Meetup. Perhaps, presenting Thee a gifted apple would soften the blow. An apple? What the fuck am I thinkin'?"

Gulp! Just realized, bud, that I thought you were alluding to the opposite of what I mistakenly expanded upon. Seriously, I misread-cum-mistook your post. TBC, I'm not apologizing for reflecting my sentiment, but it wasn't the correct, funny or otherwise, response to your reply.

Bruno

Is this troll still active (IAmNotAnonymous)?  ;D

Satoshi's like:

"XXX translation reserved and sir I'd like to be the campaign manager of your ICO"

LOLZ

What can you do as a campaign manager ?

Hello Mr. adam440, I am not a troll. Why are you accusing me ? Do not try to use your power but be more wise and speak modestly. That will build your good reputaion.

I would ask him if he is working on other crypto coin projects after he left Bitcoin behind him. He has not to tell which project, but it would help to know that he is still around and help the technology to grow.

What if he is naked :P and so is the reason he is hiding this long as he is really shy to show his nude body :D You never know what the truth is .:D

Take care of social media accounts, coordinator for bounty distribution, verify post counts/tweets etc