Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: Payment21 on February 09, 2017, 07:04:40 PM



Title: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Payment21 on February 09, 2017, 07:04:40 PM
Increasingly businesses are coming under some form of regulatory framework around the globe. For instance, on Wednesday the Peopleís Bank of China held a meeting with bitcoin exchanges operating the country with the aim of putting new regulations in place to guide them.

Meanwhile, the major selling point of bitcoin has been the privacy that it offers its users. With bitcoin enterprises and activities coming under the focus of regulators, where does the balance for bitcoin enterprises between protecting customers and trying to impress regulators?


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: xenotrunksx on February 09, 2017, 07:10:41 PM
The balance comes when regulators understand the difference between individual users holding their own keys and custodial accounts that hold your money for you ie coinbase.  Custodial accounts will need some form of regulation, Bitcoin itself does not need, and cannot be, regulated.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: maku on February 09, 2017, 07:28:06 PM
If you think that fully decentralized, totally anonymous cryptocurrency will even get close to reaching legal acceptance and therefore, semblance of adoption - think again.
Even bitcoin is a bit extreme for some people, they believe that government intervention in bitcoin is only a matter of time.
Bitcoin will be bring in line with other payment systems, you want to use bitcoin? In the future you will have to register your BTC wallet & submit personal info or you will be marked as a criminal.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Carlton Banks on February 09, 2017, 07:50:24 PM
Increasingly businesses are coming under some form of regulatory framework around the globe. For instance, on Wednesday the Peopleís Bank of China held a meeting with bitcoin exchanges operating the country with the aim of putting new regulations in place to guide them.

Meanwhile, the major selling point of bitcoin has been the privacy that it offers its users. With bitcoin enterprises and activities coming under the focus of regulators, where does the balance for bitcoin enterprises between protecting customers and trying to impress regulators?


What everyone seems to fail to understand is that the way you think of "balance" in these matters has changed forever


Put simply: regular users are interested in Bitcoin because it protects their interests, that is, their money. And it protects their money without government regulators, it does the job all by itself. It even protects ordinary users from regulators, as crucially, they have no effective way of regulating either the network or individual users.


And businesses are realising the same thing. Where the regulators lose their leverage to regulate, businesses will gain increased protection. Strange, isn't that supposed to be the regulator's role, protecting the interests of businesses and regular folk? Like most "protection" regimes, it's a more than a little ambiguous exactly who is being protected and from what.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Victorycoin on February 09, 2017, 08:03:38 PM
Increasingly businesses are coming under some form of regulatory framework around the globe. For instance, on Wednesday the Peopleís Bank of China held a meeting with bitcoin exchanges operating the country with the aim of putting new regulations in place to guide them.

Meanwhile, the major selling point of bitcoin has been the privacy that it offers its users. With bitcoin enterprises and activities coming under the focus of regulators, where does the balance for bitcoin enterprises between protecting customers and trying to impress regulators?

Here you will find the balance:
1. Coinbase was made for Bitcoin, not the other way round;
2. Bitcoin is sure to go on without the likes of Coinbase;
3. Bitcoin was born a decentralized currency;
4. governments love Blockchain, but hate Bitcoin.
.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: geopolisch on February 10, 2017, 10:52:12 AM
Increasingly businesses are coming under some form of regulatory framework around the globe. For instance, on Wednesday the Peopleís Bank of China held a meeting with bitcoin exchanges operating the country with the aim of putting new regulations in place to guide them.

Meanwhile, the major selling point of bitcoin has been the privacy that it offers its users. With bitcoin enterprises and activities coming under the focus of regulators, where does the balance for bitcoin enterprises between protecting customers and trying to impress regulators?


What everyone seems to fail to understand is that the way you think of "balance" in these matters has changed forever


Put simply: regular users are interested in Bitcoin because it protects their interests, that is, their money. And it protects their money without government regulators, it does the job all by itself. It even protects ordinary users from regulators, as crucially, they have no effective way of regulating either the network or individual users.


And businesses are realising the same thing. Where the regulators lose their leverage to regulate, businesses will gain increased protection. Strange, isn't that supposed to be the regulator's role, protecting the interests of businesses and regular folk? Like most "protection" regimes, it's a more than a little ambiguous exactly who is being protected and from what.
Well there is a reason why business owners are still not putting their money on bitcoin and that is because it is still unstable, they donít want to risk putting money and then losing it is not good for their business, we as bitcoin users we donít care about the price dropping by a $10 that does not affect us but on the big scale it affects a lot that is why it is risky.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: CraigWrightBTC on February 10, 2017, 11:06:58 AM
Increasingly businesses are coming under some form of regulatory framework around the globe. For instance, on Wednesday the Peopleís Bank of China held a meeting with bitcoin exchanges operating the country with the aim of putting new regulations in place to guide them.

Meanwhile, the major selling point of bitcoin has been the privacy that it offers its users. With bitcoin enterprises and activities coming under the focus of regulators, where does the balance for bitcoin enterprises between protecting customers and trying to impress regulators?


What everyone seems to fail to understand is that the way you think of "balance" in these matters has changed forever


Put simply: regular users are interested in Bitcoin because it protects their interests, that is, their money. And it protects their money without government regulators, it does the job all by itself. It even protects ordinary users from regulators, as crucially, they have no effective way of regulating either the network or individual users.


And businesses are realising the same thing. Where the regulators lose their leverage to regulate, businesses will gain increased protection. Strange, isn't that supposed to be the regulator's role, protecting the interests of businesses and regular folk? Like most "protection" regimes, it's a more than a little ambiguous exactly who is being protected and from what.
Well there is a reason why business owners are still not putting their money on bitcoin and that is because it is still unstable, they donít want to risk putting money and then losing it is not good for their business, we as bitcoin users we donít care about the price dropping by a $10 that does not affect us but on the big scale it affects a lot that is why it is risky.
Actually the problem of fluctuating bitcoin's price can be finished with joint to https://bitpay.com/
the payment use bitcoin can be convert to fiat currency automaticly,
it is reduce risk losing money because of fluctuating bitcoin's price for the investors with big scale.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Senor.Bla on February 10, 2017, 11:49:53 AM
If you do business somewhere, anywhere, everywhere, then you have to chose if you want to play by the rules of the location you do your business, if you want to argue and fight the rules or if you want to ignore them. In most places you have to play by the government rules and accept the regulations or you run an illegal business. You do have the option to fight (with your army of lawyers) and might change somethings.
If you run an illegal business, then your priority should be to not get caught and your customers should be aware of the risks. If you run an legal business, then just follow the rules and your customers should know where they stand and what rules apply.
Those two cases seem trivial and the remaining one is the interesting one, which will also be the one that most Bitcoin business are in. The rules are not done yet and change and the situation might change quickly and often. A company running under these circumstances will have one priority: make profit.
In order to do so most will want to stay in business and this means to pay attention to two things and balance them if you want to say so. Follow the regulations to a point where you can not be banned or fined into bankruptcy. On the other hand you want to please your customers (in this case protect their privacy) so that they stay your customers.
If you go full privacy, then you might get banned and are out of business. If you go full regulation, then you might loose all your customers and go out of business. Finding the middle ground is the key to success, but if you are forced to chose between those two extremes, then most will chose to stay with the regulations, since it is easier to find new customers then getting the regulators off your back.
A company will always make the promises the customers will want to hear, but i would not count on them. 


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Carlton Banks on February 10, 2017, 11:59:53 AM
If you do business somewhere, anywhere, everywhere, then you have to chose if you want to play by the rules of the location you do your business, if you want to argue and fight the rules or if you want to ignore them. In most places you have to play by the government rules and accept the regulations or you run an illegal business. You do have the option to fight (with your army of lawyers) and might change somethings.
If you run an illegal business, then your priority should be to not get caught and your customers should be aware of the risks. If you run an legal business, then just follow the rules and your customers should know where they stand and what rules apply. 

You still don't get it: you're describing the status quo, not how things have changed.


Let's put it a different way: if, in 2010, a government issued a decree that all small businesses must pay a 90% revenue tax, businesses would have no choice but to comply (and almost certainly go out of business). In 2020, the same decree would not have the same effect.

So, the balance of power has changed between Bitcoin based businesses and the governments in their respective jurisdictions. Where the government previously had almost all power, Bitcoin businesses now have the power to resist draconianism, they have a bargaining chip where they previously had none.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Senor.Bla on February 10, 2017, 12:43:06 PM
If you do business somewhere, anywhere, everywhere, then you have to chose if you want to play by the rules of the location you do your business, if you want to argue and fight the rules or if you want to ignore them. In most places you have to play by the government rules and accept the regulations or you run an illegal business. You do have the option to fight (with your army of lawyers) and might change somethings.
If you run an illegal business, then your priority should be to not get caught and your customers should be aware of the risks. If you run an legal business, then just follow the rules and your customers should know where they stand and what rules apply. 

You still don't get it: you're describing the status quo, not how things have changed.


Let's put it a different way: if, in 2010, a government issued a decree that all small businesses must pay a 90% revenue tax, businesses would have no choice but to comply (and almost certainly go out of business). In 2020, the same decree would not have the same effect.

So, the balance of power has changed between Bitcoin based businesses and the governments in their respective jurisdictions. Where the government previously had almost all power, Bitcoin businesses now have the power to resist draconianism, they have a bargaining chip where they previously had none.
sorry, but i disagree. If i had a shop in 2010 and made all my business deal in cash (we assume i run a fiat exchange at a tourist hot spot), how could they force me to comply or shut me down? Because this will be the answer how they will do it with Bitcoin.
There are rules you can play by or not. Using Bitcoin it might be easier to not play by the rules, but this will not change the rules.
If you think that i still do not get your point, then maybe make an example and help me understand.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Xester on February 10, 2017, 12:53:29 PM
Increasingly businesses are coming under some form of regulatory framework around the globe. For instance, on Wednesday the Peopleís Bank of China held a meeting with bitcoin exchanges operating the country with the aim of putting new regulations in place to guide them.

Meanwhile, the major selling point of bitcoin has been the privacy that it offers its users. With bitcoin enterprises and activities coming under the focus of regulators, where does the balance for bitcoin enterprises between protecting customers and trying to impress regulators?



Bitcoin transaction is still anonymous and remains a secret. Those laws and policies will only take effect if somebody has done illegal transactions such as money laundering. Without doing such illicit act there is no need to worry since the authorities will not look into your wallet. They will only look at suspicious wallets with high volumes of bitcoin and make sure that money launderers cannot escape their sight.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Carlton Banks on February 10, 2017, 12:56:47 PM
If you think that i still do not get your point, then maybe make an example and help me understand.

You still don't get it, despite the provision of an example. Cash can be easily confiscated, Bitcoin cannot.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Red-Apple on February 10, 2017, 01:00:00 PM
Meanwhile, the major selling point of bitcoin has been the privacy that it offers its users. With bitcoin enterprises and activities coming under the focus of regulators, where does the balance for bitcoin enterprises between protecting customers and trying to impress regulators?

bitcoin offers privacy and anonymity to some extent not fiat.

in other words you have to understand the difference between these two. when you use bitcoin and bitcoin alone you are on your own, your own bank, your own wallet and your own security.

but when you want to go on an exchange, use fiat and banks to transfer money you have to also accept all the rules that come with fiat. one of them is lack of privacy.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: noormcs5 on February 10, 2017, 01:12:53 PM
If you think that fully decentralized, totally anonymous cryptocurrency will even get close to reaching legal acceptance and therefore, semblance of adoption - think again.
Even bitcoin is a bit extreme for some people, they believe that government intervention in bitcoin is only a matter of time.
Bitcoin will be bring in line with other payment systems, you want to use bitcoin? In the future you will have to register your BTC wallet & submit personal info or you will be marked as a criminal.


To be forced to register your wallet and personal information can only be done on web wallets. Govt. Cannot control the desktop wallets and one can have as many wallets as he wants without the govt. knowing it. So if the bitcoin is to be regulated then the only option is to stop the desktop and hardware wallets and make only web wallets functional which is impossible.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Reid on February 10, 2017, 01:19:24 PM
Increasingly businesses are coming under some form of regulatory framework around the globe. For instance, on Wednesday the Peopleís Bank of China held a meeting with bitcoin exchanges operating the country with the aim of putting new regulations in place to guide them.

Meanwhile, the major selling point of bitcoin has been the privacy that it offers its users. With bitcoin enterprises and activities coming under the focus of regulators, where does the balance for bitcoin enterprises between protecting customers and trying to impress regulators?

Here you will find the balance:
1. Coinbase was made for Bitcoin, not the other way round;
2. Bitcoin is sure to go on without the likes of Coinbase;
3. Bitcoin was born a decentralized currency;
4. governments love Blockchain, but hate Bitcoin.
.

I have that evil smile when I read this one.  8)

Regulators. What are they regulating? Isn't it obvious that it is all just because of large amount of money. Why now? Because bitcoin is hitting the thousand mark? They didn't even care when it was all down to almost nothing and now they want in. What hypocrites.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: danherbias07 on February 10, 2017, 01:25:02 PM
If you do business somewhere, anywhere, everywhere, then you have to chose if you want to play by the rules of the location you do your business, if you want to argue and fight the rules or if you want to ignore them. In most places you have to play by the government rules and accept the regulations or you run an illegal business. You do have the option to fight (with your army of lawyers) and might change somethings.
If you run an illegal business, then your priority should be to not get caught and your customers should be aware of the risks. If you run an legal business, then just follow the rules and your customers should know where they stand and what rules apply. 

You still don't get it: you're describing the status quo, not how things have changed.


Let's put it a different way: if, in 2010, a government issued a decree that all small businesses must pay a 90% revenue tax, businesses would have no choice but to comply (and almost certainly go out of business). In 2020, the same decree would not have the same effect.

So, the balance of power has changed between Bitcoin based businesses and the governments in their respective jurisdictions. Where the government previously had almost all power, Bitcoin businesses now have the power to resist draconianism, they have a bargaining chip where they previously had none.

And this is why they want control?
It will look like a balance but still it is for their own pockets. Well, it is quite understandable if we think of it. If there is no tax the government cannot work. Who want to be an official without pay. But with this, what they really want is more. The taxes are not enough so they see a hole in bitcoin to where they could earn more. This is BS but it is our own government who we are talking about.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Senor.Bla on February 10, 2017, 01:41:42 PM
If you think that i still do not get your point, then maybe make an example and help me understand.

You still don't get it, despite the provision of an example. Cash can be easily confiscated, Bitcoin cannot.
So you are telling me that the news we read from time to time about the police auctioning off confiscated Bitcoins are fake? I think Bitcoins can be confiscated and like i stated before it might be easier to do illegal stuff with Bitcoin, but it remains illegal. Even if they do not manage to seize your Bitcoin, they can hurt you and shut your business down and make sure you will not be able to spend your money. Just like now there are criminals who made some money, secured it somewhere safe and are now after their prison sentence unable to spend it, because they are watched closely.
But i guess you have a different theory and opinion and that is fine.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: alyssa85 on February 10, 2017, 01:44:14 PM


You still don't get it: you're describing the status quo, not how things have changed.


Let's put it a different way: if, in 2010, a government issued a decree that all small businesses must pay a 90% revenue tax, businesses would have no choice but to comply (and almost certainly go out of business). In 2020, the same decree would not have the same effect.

So, the balance of power has changed between Bitcoin based businesses and the governments in their respective jurisdictions. Where the government previously had almost all power, Bitcoin businesses now have the power to resist draconianism, they have a bargaining chip where they previously had none.

Things haven't changed and won't change. Bitcoin isn't anonymous, it is pseudonymous. That means govts can enforce their laws if they want to.

If you don't like the laws in a given jurisdiction, you need to move. Staying put and imagining that a bit of technology will get round legal structures is wishful thinking.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Carlton Banks on February 10, 2017, 01:51:15 PM
Things haven't changed and won't change. Bitcoin isn't anonymous, it is pseudonymous. That means govts can enforce their laws if they want to.

If you don't like the laws in a given jurisdiction, you need to move. Staying put and imagining that a bit of technology will get round legal structures is wishful thinking.

No-one said anything about anonymity or staying put being important, it's about the balance of control. Cash or bank account can be confiscated. BTC cannot. It's very simple, but apparently not simple enough for some


And so your reply doesn't even relate to what I wrote


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: mobnepal on February 10, 2017, 02:01:13 PM
With bitcoin enterprises and activities coming under the focus of regulators, where does the balance for bitcoin enterprises between protecting customers and trying to impress regulators?
Regulators want to take tax out of profit bitcoin traders are making with trading and also they want to stop people from sending their yuan out of country which is one of the cause for devaluation of their currency. Also they want to limit money laundering, any legally operating exchangers have to comply with this so they have to present all their record book to government.

So this types of regulated/registered trading platform can't protect customers information and they have to do this to keep running. But governments can't stop bitcoin transaction, face to face deal and deal over localbitcoins is best way to get way without noticed/investigated by authority.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Kprawn on February 10, 2017, 04:00:56 PM
Things haven't changed and won't change. Bitcoin isn't anonymous, it is pseudonymous. That means govts can enforce their laws if they want to.

If you don't like the laws in a given jurisdiction, you need to move. Staying put and imagining that a bit of technology will get round legal structures is wishful thinking.

No-one said anything about anonymity or staying put being important, it's about the balance of control. Cash or bank account can be confiscated. BTC cannot. It's very simple, but apparently not simple enough for some


And so your reply doesn't even relate to what I wrote

The way most people use Bitcoin these days, I would wager a bet that they will lose almost all their coins, when regulated exchanges are forced

to block accounts. How many bitcoins are stored in services that adhere to strict AML/KYC regulations.. How many of them can be forced to

block accounts and then to transfer the "live" coins and the ones held in cold storage to the government. It has happened with Fiat banks, so

why not with these services?


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Carlton Banks on February 10, 2017, 04:12:55 PM
The way most people use Bitcoin these days, I would wager a bet that they will lose almost all their coins, when regulated exchanges are forced

to block accounts. How many bitcoins are stored in services that adhere to strict AML/KYC regulations.. How many of them can be forced to

block accounts and then to transfer the "live" coins and the ones held in cold storage to the government. It has happened with Fiat banks, so

why not with these services?

That all makes sense. But who says the majority of people let 3rd parties keep their coins? Maybe that's true, but I'm not seeing any actual evidence for that



The fact remains: those who do secure their own Bitcoins for themselves cannot have them taken by force, it doesn't matter if it's government or just a regular street mugger. That's never been possible ever before, to think that this huge change will go unexploited only demonstrates a severe lack of imagination.


Where the banks and government once held all the power, now everyone is equally powerful.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Kprawn on February 10, 2017, 04:22:55 PM
The way most people use Bitcoin these days, I would wager a bet that they will lose almost all their coins, when regulated exchanges are forced

to block accounts. How many bitcoins are stored in services that adhere to strict AML/KYC regulations.. How many of them can be forced to

block accounts and then to transfer the "live" coins and the ones held in cold storage to the government. It has happened with Fiat banks, so

why not with these services?

That all makes sense. But who says the majority of people let 3rd parties keep their coins? Maybe that's true, but I'm not seeing any actual evidence for that



The fact remains: those who do secure their own Bitcoins for themselves cannot have them taken by force, it doesn't matter if it's government or just a regular street mugger. That's never been possible ever before, to think that this huge change will go unexploited only demonstrates a severe lack of imagination.


Where the banks and government once held all the power, now everyone is equally powerful.

Yes, Carlton... It will take a lot of aggressive threats by the governments to "take" your coins and this will not happen to the average Bitcoiner

that stores his/her coins in cold storage, but they can target the soft targets first... namely : regulated 3rd parties. You should NEVER

store more than 20% of your total hoard in these services... to reduce the risk of these services getting hacked or "blocked" by government

actions. Just look at what happened with members on this forum, when they raided their houses. < Reason : suspected money transmitter >  ::)


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Carlton Banks on February 10, 2017, 04:31:53 PM
Why aren't you saying "Yeah, great that ordinary people now have more control over their money"?

Why concentrate on the negatives? Everything you've said will be completely insignificant when Bitcoin is a cultural norm



Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: franky1 on February 10, 2017, 05:17:39 PM
?? those that secure their coins cant have them taken by force ??

hmmmm

silkroad stash grabbed by authorities debunks that theory


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: avikz on February 10, 2017, 05:38:38 PM
 A balance needs to be stuck in here between the regulators and the bitcoin end users. Otherwise, bitcoin will be treated illegally around the world. A country should come forward to take a positive decision where the views of users/owners or the regulators view coincide. However, it is not bad that governments are slowly taking interest in to bitcoin. It would help bitcoin grow.

May the regulators come up with a tax structure for the bitcoin business owners or they can impose a certain tax on bitcoin earning. Whatever it may be, a balance needs to be stuck at some point of time. It will be for good I believe!


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Vaccinus on February 10, 2017, 05:45:32 PM
Things haven't changed and won't change. Bitcoin isn't anonymous, it is pseudonymous. That means govts can enforce their laws if they want to.

If you don't like the laws in a given jurisdiction, you need to move. Staying put and imagining that a bit of technology will get round legal structures is wishful thinking.

No-one said anything about anonymity or staying put being important, it's about the balance of control. Cash or bank account can be confiscated. BTC cannot. It's very simple, but apparently not simple enough for some


And so your reply doesn't even relate to what I wrote

I remember some bitcoin being confiscated and iuctioned by federal, the coins that we call taunted i think, i see no difference in confiscation between bitcoin and fiat, just more hard with the latter


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Carlton Banks on February 10, 2017, 05:55:54 PM
I remember some bitcoin being confiscated and iuctioned by federal, the coins that we call taunted i think,

Voluntarily handing over the coins is not force, and so not a confiscation at all.

i see no difference in confiscation between bitcoin and fiat, just more hard with the latter

That's because you don't understand the difference, as your previous comment illustrates.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: maku on February 10, 2017, 06:01:14 PM
Things haven't changed and won't change. Bitcoin isn't anonymous, it is pseudonymous. That means govts can enforce their laws if they want to.

If you don't like the laws in a given jurisdiction, you need to move. Staying put and imagining that a bit of technology will get round legal structures is wishful thinking.

No-one said anything about anonymity or staying put being important, it's about the balance of control. Cash or bank account can be confiscated. BTC cannot. It's very simple, but apparently not simple enough for some


And so your reply doesn't even relate to what I wrote

I remember some bitcoin being confiscated and iuctioned by federal, the coins that we call taunted i think, i see no difference in confiscation between bitcoin and fiat, just more hard with the latter

Here is my final thought about this:
1. Physical banknotes can be confiscated if police will find your stash.
2. Bitcoin is easier to hide, copies of your wallet.dat can be stored on any device, optical disk, usb stick... You can even write it down on paper, or memorize your seed passphrase.

So it all comes to your strong will. You can disclose both location of your hidden paper money as well as where you hide copy of your bitcoin wallet.
The weakest link is as always human brain.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Carlton Banks on February 10, 2017, 06:17:07 PM
You can disclose both location of your hidden paper money as well as where you hide copy of your bitcoin wallet.


Hidden physical money exists in a physical place. Someone could find it even if they didn't know it was there. Bitcoin is nowhere, pure information.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: Payment21 on February 10, 2017, 06:24:46 PM
The balance comes when regulators understand the difference between individual users holding their own keys and custodial accounts that hold your money for you ie coinbase.  Custodial accounts will need some form of regulation, Bitcoin itself does not need, and cannot be, regulated.


Very true. If users need to avoid regulators then they will need to avoid custodial accounts. In some instances however, such as moving into and out of bitcoin, isnt easy.


Title: Re: Where is the Balance?
Post by: maku on February 10, 2017, 06:37:28 PM
You can disclose both location of your hidden paper money as well as where you hide copy of your bitcoin wallet.


Hidden physical money exists in a physical place. Someone could find it even if they didn't know it was there. Bitcoin is nowhere, pure information.
Yes, you are correct. But I see no problem with extracting this information from basically anyone. Couple hours of waterboarding should do the trick here.

On the side note: Do we know exactly how FBI seized bitcoins of Dread Pirate Roberts aka Ross Ulbricht?
Did they force him to reveal it by force, stash wasn't protected or he did it from his own good will?