|
Title: sfg Post by: Anonymous on June 11, 2010, 06:19:41 PM dsag
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: lachesis on June 11, 2010, 06:24:26 PM That's true. It is getting to be time for a new release. Maybe Laszlo's performance patch will make it into the svn too?
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: laszlo on June 12, 2010, 07:10:08 AM Please note that I'm not the Bitcoin author - if you don't trust me then don't use these. I have written instructions that should get you started if you want to build your own (look around at my other posts).
Some unofficial builds that I created: Mac OS X, Linux (64 bit) and Win32 builds available http://heliacal.net/~solar/bitcoin/builds/ This includes a tiny patch I added to show how many hashes per second are being processed. A picture of the hash counter is attached. If you want the patch so you can build it yourself it is available here: http://heliacal.net/~solar/bitcoin/bitcoin-svn-81-perfcounter-2010-06-12.patch http://heliacal.net/~solar/bitcoin/bc-svn-81-win32.png Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: HostFat on June 12, 2010, 05:37:35 PM Thank you very much! :D
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: HostFat on June 16, 2010, 11:45:34 PM I'm trying to generate coin with your windows build, and it seems that it doesn't work at all.
It was working with the official exe. Is there a bug somewhere on official code? Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: laszlo on June 16, 2010, 11:52:34 PM Joozero, what is the problem with it? I use that binary myself and it works for me.
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: HostFat on June 17, 2010, 12:59:47 AM I doesn't generate coins anymore.
Anyway it could be a problem with windows 7 x64, even if the latest one was working. I know that there is a lot of math and we have to be luck, it is just strange :) I'll wait some more ... Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: laszlo on June 17, 2010, 01:22:16 AM Joozero I'm sorry if it doesn't work for you.. I noticed that the performance with the windows client seems slower than the other two I built.. I'm not sure if this is because of a mistake I made or something I overlooked in the code but I will take another look and let you know if I find anything. Maybe there is something else wrong with it besides just the performance..
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: ender_x on June 17, 2010, 02:47:47 PM Thanks laszlo..
Also any chance of a 32-bit build? Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: laszlo on June 17, 2010, 04:03:16 PM 32 bit linux? Yea I can do that.
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: satoshi on June 17, 2010, 05:07:56 PM I'm working on getting version 0.3 released as soon as I can. Just a last few things left to do. It's been a long time since 0.2 and we need to get a prebuilt bitcoind with command line and JSON-RPC available. This time we'll have both 32-bit and 64-bit linux binaries, and Laszlo is going to build a Mac OSX release. Plus, we'll include the German, Dutch and Italian translations by DataWraith, Xunie and Joozero (thanks you guys!).
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: laszlo on June 17, 2010, 06:45:55 PM Yay
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: sirius on June 18, 2010, 08:24:12 AM Satoshi, do you think we could change the about text "Do not rely on it for actual financial transactions" for the next release? It's good to notify of the risk involved, but telling not to use it for financial transactions is not very good if we want to build an economy. Maybe it could be "for transactions of significant amount" or something like that?
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: Vasiliev on June 19, 2010, 06:29:54 AM Possibly "This software is in beta, be wary of using it for financial transactions" or something of that sort?
Title: Re: new binary release? Post by: HostFat on June 21, 2010, 08:09:27 PM Ok, it is generating now ( I just get 50 coins ).
I was just worried it is slower than the official build. Anyway, I know that something is probably changed ( there are more people with better CPUs ) Is it possible to add also the "Proof-of-work difficulty" real-time value somewhere on the GUI ? |
