|
Title: franky1 stats Post by: thejaytiesto on March 30, 2017, 01:35:15 PM Activity: 1638
Posts: 12126 GitHub pull requests: 0 Segwit is a bankster trojan horse from hell, i've studied every single line of the code. It doesn't work. BU is fantastic, it DOES NOT make the supply more than 21 million eventually, it DOES NOT give more control to miners. BU is safe. Segwit does not scale, it's an evil bankster takeover. Corestream propaganda will brainwash you into thinking otherwise. Gmaxwell is a.. https://media.tenor.co/images/949f42b13894d3865614b1e08d7177db/tenor.gif Title: Re: franky1 stats Post by: cellard on March 30, 2017, 01:52:09 PM Personal stuff doesn't belong in general, make this your signature or something. OP is calling out on franky1's bullshit. Im sick of seeing his posts everywhere discrediting the endless hours that Peter Wiuelle and the rest have put on segwit like that. We are talking about a group of experts working hard as hell increase the capacity of bitcoin (actual scaling) but franky1 keeps talking shit about it when he is obviously underqualified. Title: Re: franky1 stats Post by: franky1 on March 30, 2017, 02:18:07 PM Segwit is a bankster trojan horse from hell, i've studied every single line of the code. It doesn't work. BU is fantastic, it DOES NOT make the supply more than 21 million eventually, it DOES NOT give more control to miners. BU is safe. Segwit does not scale, it's an evil bankster takeover. Corestream propaganda will brainwash you into thinking otherwise. Gmaxwell is a..
1. i only have one username on this forum but i do not go by franky1 in other locations. in short even my birth certificate is not franky1. so dont expect my github to announce franky1. 2. i am for DIVERSE consensus network and DYNAMICS, which there are many implementations. trying to pigeon hole my as a BU guy, is like the failure in the past to try pigeon holing me into xt or classic during all of those REKT campaigns. i was defending diversity. not the bandcamp 3. Bu does not propose to change the 21mill.. if you do your research on Peter R mentioning of 'inflation needs non zero'.. he is talking about BLOCKSPACE. even watching the first 60 seconds of video that blockstreamists try using as the source of 'non zero inflation' reveal that. yep. under 60 seconds of a video. he is talking about blockspace, not 21m coin cap. its so easy to research that i laugh when people prefer the reddit scripts 4. if you want to refute what i say. use REAL data, REAL rebuttles. you know a proper intellectual rebuttle on bitcoin code... you only hate me because the only thing you can rebut is my personality. not the content/context. because dep down you know that segwit wont meet the utopian promises sold to you in the reddit script propaganda 5. giving miners control? BU has not gone soft. bu and other dynamic implementations are sticking with consensus. hence no deadlines and just plodding along waiting for people to download the nodes.. even funnier no threats or side stepping the community.. unlike segwit 6. if you want to argue post stats. i can show you a name of someone that cant even read c++, who has more post counts then me but been in the forum less time as me, (meaning more active) who thinks they know better... but thats personal attacking and not on the subject of bitcoin have a nice day enjoy researching. p.s while your at it. LEARN CONSENSUS i would say that should be step one for anyone wishing to understand bitcoin, even before learning how to read code. |
