Bitcoin Forum

Other => Politics & Society => Topic started by: awesome31312 on May 22, 2017, 01:10:09 AM



Title: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: awesome31312 on May 22, 2017, 01:10:09 AM
I am curious to know what Bitcointalk's opinion is about this.

"Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave cast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays. Hillary must return all money from such countries!"
~Pre-election Trump

To be very honest, I doubt this will make a difference, if Trump supporters could be convinced with reason, they wouldn't have voted for him in the first place.



Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: xhomerx10 on May 22, 2017, 01:34:58 AM
I am curious to know what Bitcointalk's opinion is about this.

"Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave cast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays. Hillary must return all money from such countries!"
~Pre-election Trump

To be very honest, I doubt this will make a difference, if Trump supporters could be convinced with reason, they wouldn't have voted for him in the first place.




  Can you explain how this deal will cost taxpayers $110b?  What do you doubt will make a difference?

 I can't really understand what you are getting at...


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: TheCoinGrabber on May 22, 2017, 02:04:17 AM
I am curious to know what Bitcointalk's opinion is about this.

"Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave cast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays. Hillary must return all money from such countries!"
~Pre-election Trump

To be very honest, I doubt this will make a difference, if Trump supporters could be convinced with reason, they wouldn't have voted for him in the first place.



And now they have and arms deal with one of those countries. Guess the realities of running a global power has finally dawned on him... Or maybe not, he didn't include KSA in his attempted ban, despite it being a hotbed of Wahabbism (IMHO its only unique export in modern times).

Yeah, it was really shocking. IMHO though, they could have clung to any Republican.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Sithara007 on May 22, 2017, 07:59:41 AM
The headline can't be anymore misleading. Trump's deal with Saudi Arabia will add tens of billions of USD to the treasury, and it will create hundreds of thousands of extra jobs in the United States. But then, it is wrong to expect anything positive about Trump from the mainstream media.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Xester on May 22, 2017, 12:05:24 PM
I am curious to know what Bitcointalk's opinion is about this.

"Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave cast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays. Hillary must return all money from such countries!"
~Pre-election Trump

To be very honest, I doubt this will make a difference, if Trump supporters could be convinced with reason, they wouldn't have voted for him in the first place.



The reason possibly that Trump won the election is due to this principle " choose the lesser evil". Trump is much better than Clinton and if Clinton won the election shed be much worst than Trump. Trump is pro-life and hilary is anti-life with regard to the issue of abortion. The economy of America as well as solving the most crucial issues in America which is unemployment will be solved by Trump.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Proton2233 on May 22, 2017, 12:23:09 PM
How can you hope that Trump is able to do something. All his efforts are now focused on in order to avoid impeachment. Trump accidentally became President, and therefore he did not know what to do. What is good in business could ruin it in politics.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: awesome31312 on May 22, 2017, 01:49:43 PM
The headline can't be anymore misleading. Trump's deal with Saudi Arabia will add tens of billions of USD to the treasury, and it will create hundreds of thousands of extra jobs in the United States. But then, it is wrong to expect anything positive about Trump from the mainstream media.

Your post is a paid shitpost.

The money went to a country that is involved in human rights violations. The money will be used to participate in the military industrial complex, which is a machine that takes from taxpayer money and injects into the hands of the corporate elite


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: xhomerx10 on May 22, 2017, 03:39:37 PM
The headline can't be anymore misleading. Trump's deal with Saudi Arabia will add tens of billions of USD to the treasury, and it will create hundreds of thousands of extra jobs in the United States. But then, it is wrong to expect anything positive about Trump from the mainstream media.

Your post is a paid shitpost.

The money went to a country that is involved in human rights violations. The money will be used to participate in the military industrial complex, which is a machine that takes from taxpayer money and injects into the hands of the corporate elite


 Check your history books 2011 through 2015.  Saudis are historically the top purchasers of arms from the US.  This is one of the few countries that actually pay for them!



Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Spendulus on May 22, 2017, 06:00:29 PM
The headline can't be anymore misleading. Trump's deal with Saudi Arabia will add tens of billions of USD to the treasury, and it will create hundreds of thousands of extra jobs in the United States. But then, it is wrong to expect anything positive about Trump from the mainstream media.

Your post is a paid shitpost.

The money went to a country that is involved in human rights violations. The money will be used to participate in the military industrial complex, which is a machine that takes from taxpayer money and injects into the hands of the corporate elite



Your post is a paid shitpost.
Disagree.

The money went to a country that is involved in human rights violations.
Agree.

The money will be used to participate in the military industrial complex
Agree

which is a machine
Disagree, it's a broad conceptualization of a hugely diverse set of companies, many involved in dozens of things besides military work

...that takes from taxpayer money and injects into the hands of the corporate elite
Agree in part. You've defined the job of a company's leadership, to earn profit for it's investors. But "taking from taxpayer money" in this case is false, since the income stream is from Saudi.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Wayan_Pedjeng on May 22, 2017, 06:09:17 PM
Glad to see that Trump is interested in maintaining good relations with Saudi Arabia, although he is Islamophobic. Saudi Arabia is the future super-power. So maintaining good relations with them can be beneficial for the Americans.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Lancusters on May 22, 2017, 10:03:26 PM
Glad to see that Trump is interested in maintaining good relations with Saudi Arabia, although he is Islamophobic. Saudi Arabia is the future super-power. So maintaining good relations with them can be beneficial for the Americans.
You contradict yourself. If Trump Islamophobia, why he is interested in good relations with the Arab world? It's not logical. Probably all is much easier. I think he has interest in the oil business and he's a lobbyist for weapons manufacturers. I'd like to see his income statement and compare with the period when he was President.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: joebrook on May 22, 2017, 10:55:36 PM
Your subject title and message doesnt match at all, And with regards to arms deal, its rather the US Government who is getting all those money and Ivanka's foundation also getting $100 million as well.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Sithara007 on May 23, 2017, 01:45:19 AM
Has any western nation ever actually delivered any arms to saudi arabia since 2001? They keep making these deals but they'll never deliver. Why do you think the US and Canada are ramping up oil production? It's almost as if they're preparing for something...

A lot of western nations have delivered weapons to Saudi Arabia, during the past two decades. The list is long, but includes the United States, Canada, and Germany. Right now Saudi Arabia is bombing the Yemenis with explosives and jets which they got from these western nations.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: mainpmf on May 23, 2017, 12:51:43 PM
Yeaaaaaaaah

Wonderful!
I mean that's really cool way to make america great again!
Let's sell billions of weapons to extremist islamists that's a brillant idea.

Oh and also close borders to muslims that's important.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Agrello on May 23, 2017, 01:04:33 PM
Yeaaaaaaaah

Wonderful!
I mean that's really cool way to make america great again!
Let's sell billions of weapons to extremist islamists that's a brillant idea.

Oh and also close borders to muslims that's important.


Hahah exactly. Does not make sense does it. I am not sure why people dont realise whats going on. It takes a 5 min google search. Oh well. Such is.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: mainpmf on May 23, 2017, 01:06:49 PM
Who knows? Maybe the master plan is to reduce worldwide Muslim population by proxy war with ISIS.

Arm Iran (by Russia, China), arm Saudis (US, Germany), ISIS and Iraqis, Syrian factions, Kurds, Turkey etc.

Let them fight each other to reduce the number of Muslims worldwide.

You sit, count the money and count the bodies (Muslim and non-Muslim)....

Problem with this plan is that it just takes too long...and in the end you'll not solve the root cause of the problem.

Jihadist ideology is part of Islam that is the root cause.


SUre!
Can't be inequality of wealth and constant exterior destabilization in order to take natural ressources.
Must be Islam.

I mean come on, we all know that the real problem is Islam, and there is a great correlation between the two because as we all know terrorism started with Islam! Wait... Didn't it started after the whole numerous wars in Middle East?

No, can't be that. Can't be our fault.

Yeah it's Islam!


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: J Gambler on May 23, 2017, 01:22:29 PM
This is why those arabs want to leave U.S for good because of sarcastic moves of trump yeh we know that trump hates muslims or other religion this is in human that they pay another tax of $100b this is too huge. But no ones will get this on heaven much better if we are going to be good than abusing someones power.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: TheCoinGrabber on May 23, 2017, 04:10:25 PM
Yeaaaaaaaah

Wonderful!
I mean that's really cool way to make america great again!
Let's sell billions of weapons to extremist islamists that's a brillant idea.

Oh and also close borders to Muslims that's important.

Who knows? Maybe the master plan is to reduce worldwide Muslim population by proxy war with ISIS.

Arm Iran (by Russia, China), arm Saudis (US, Germany), ISIS and Iraqis, Syrian factions, Kurds, Turkey etc.

Let them fight each other to reduce the number of Muslims worldwide.

You sit, count the money and count the bodies (Muslim and non-Muslim)....

Problem with this plan is that it just takes too long...and in the end you'll not solve the root cause of the problem.

Jihadist ideology is part of Islam that is the root cause.





I don't think so. What do you make off all those things they've allowed into Europe. Those will breed like rabbits and outbred Europeans within a decade or two.
Who knows? Maybe the master plan is to reduce worldwide Muslim population by proxy war with ISIS.

Arm Iran (by Russia, China), arm Saudis (US, Germany), ISIS and Iraqis, Syrian factions, Kurds, Turkey etc.

Let them fight each other to reduce the number of Muslims worldwide.

You sit, count the money and count the bodies (Muslim and non-Muslim)....

Problem with this plan is that it just takes too long...and in the end you'll not solve the root cause of the problem.

Jihadist ideology is part of Islam that is the root cause.


SUre!
Can't be inequality of wealth and constant exterior destabilization in order to take natural ressources.
Must be Islam.

I mean come on, we all know that the real problem is Islam, and there is a great correlation between the two because as we all know terrorism started with Islam! Wait... Didn't it started after the whole numerous wars in Middle East?

No, can't be that. Can't be our fault.

Yeah it's Islam!


Continue going back in time and you'll eventually see the problem...


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: mainpmf on May 24, 2017, 01:39:01 PM
Who knows? Maybe the master plan is to reduce worldwide Muslim population by proxy war with ISIS.

Arm Iran (by Russia, China), arm Saudis (US, Germany), ISIS and Iraqis, Syrian factions, Kurds, Turkey etc.

Let them fight each other to reduce the number of Muslims worldwide.

You sit, count the money and count the bodies (Muslim and non-Muslim)....

Problem with this plan is that it just takes too long...and in the end you'll not solve the root cause of the problem.

Jihadist ideology is part of Islam that is the root cause.


SUre!
Can't be inequality of wealth and constant exterior destabilization in order to take natural ressources.
Must be Islam.

I mean come on, we all know that the real problem is Islam, and there is a great correlation between the two because as we all know terrorism started with Islam! Wait... Didn't it started after the whole numerous wars in Middle East?

No, can't be that. Can't be our fault.

Yeah it's Islam!


Continue going back in time and you'll eventually see the problem...

If we go back in time what do we see?
Few wars between ottoman empire and west.
Colonization.
Crusades.
Shit like this?
Wanna count the points?
Not sure West is the winner here...


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: TheCoinGrabber on May 24, 2017, 04:08:02 PM
Who knows? Maybe the master plan is to reduce worldwide Muslim population by proxy war with ISIS.

Arm Iran (by Russia, China), arm Saudis (US, Germany), ISIS and Iraqis, Syrian factions, Kurds, Turkey etc.

Let them fight each other to reduce the number of Muslims worldwide.

You sit, count the money and count the bodies (Muslim and non-Muslim)....

Problem with this plan is that it just takes too long...and in the end you'll not solve the root cause of the problem.

Jihadist ideology is part of Islam that is the root cause.


SUre!
Can't be inequality of wealth and constant exterior destabilization in order to take natural ressources.
Must be Islam.

I mean come on, we all know that the real problem is Islam, and there is a great correlation between the two because as we all know terrorism started with Islam! Wait... Didn't it started after the whole numerous wars in Middle East?

No, can't be that. Can't be our fault.

Yeah it's Islam!


Continue going back in time and you'll eventually see the problem...

If we go back in time what do we see?
Few wars between ottoman empire and west.
Colonization.
Crusades.
Shit like this?
Wanna count the points?
Not sure West is the winner here...

Of course they aren't. The West, as a whole, didn't become an major aggressor in the Middle East until much, much later after it has become rich from wealth pouring from the colonies and has basically surpassed the Muslims in technology. The Crusades are more of an anomaly and bound to fail anyway. The Middle East was already fucked up under the Ottomans, and became fuckedx2 once the borders were drawn when the empire shrunk and became Turkey.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Wa(t)ch_night() on May 24, 2017, 08:26:26 PM
Who knows? Maybe the master plan is to reduce worldwide Muslim population by proxy war with ISIS.

Arm Iran (by Russia, China), arm Saudis (US, Germany), ISIS and Iraqis, Syrian factions, Kurds, Turkey etc.

Let them fight each other to reduce the number of Muslims worldwide.

You sit, count the money and count the bodies (Muslim and non-Muslim)....

Problem with this plan is that it just takes too long...and in the end you'll not solve the root cause of the problem.

Jihadist ideology is part of Islam that is the root cause.


SUre!
Can't be inequality of wealth and constant exterior destabilization in order to take natural ressources.
Must be Islam.

I mean come on, we all know that the real problem is Islam, and there is a great correlation between the two because as we all know terrorism started with Islam! Wait... Didn't it started after the whole numerous wars in Middle East?

No, can't be that. Can't be our fault.

Yeah it's Islam!


Continue going back in time and you'll eventually see the problem...

If we go back in time what do we see?
Few wars between ottoman empire and west.
Colonization.
Crusades.
Shit like this?
Wanna count the points?
Not sure West is the winner here...

Of course they aren't. The West, as a whole, didn't become an major aggressor in the Middle East until much, much later after it has become rich from wealth pouring from the colonies and has basically surpassed the Muslims in technology. The Crusades are more of an anomaly and bound to fail anyway. The Middle East was already fucked up under the Ottomans, and became fuckedx2 once the borders were drawn when the empire shrunk and became Turkey.
I have never seen the President of America so much in friendly relations with the leaders of the Arab countries. Apparently money is doing its job and financial matters are much more important than the issue of religion or politics in general. So it's better Let it be so than war in delusions.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Lancusters on May 24, 2017, 11:39:51 PM
The Arabs are very clever people. If they're so happy with the deal and even gave Ivanka a 100 million dollars I was very alarming. Sure this deal is worth close examination. Trump an inexperienced politician and I think that for the material gain it may not be seen as a political defeat.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Snail2 on May 25, 2017, 09:42:51 AM
If we go back in time what do we see?
Few wars between ottoman empire and west.
Colonization.
Crusades.
Shit like this?
Wanna count the points?
Not sure West is the winner here...

The West will win. Those arabs are divided in every possible way and as the wahhabis and Iran gaining ground, those divisions are getting deeper and deeper every day.

Crusades were a natural answer to the earlier muslim invasion of Europe (Spain, Sicily, France, Italy and the Byzantine territories, Armenia, Georgia). After the beginning or the Reconquista, recapturing Sicily, Malta, Rhodes and Cyprus, bringing the war back to the Middle East was the best defence against further incursions and also relived the pressure on the Byzantine Empire. So the tusken were kept at bay and away from our lands for nearly 200 years what gave us enough time to prepare for the next invasion (ottomans).

The ottomans occupied the whole Balkans, the Romanian principalities, half of Hungary, South Ukraine and repeatedly launched large scale attacks towards the west.

So, mate who used to invade whom?



Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: TheCoinGrabber on May 25, 2017, 09:52:59 AM
Who knows? Maybe the master plan is to reduce worldwide Muslim population by proxy war with ISIS.

Arm Iran (by Russia, China), arm Saudis (US, Germany), ISIS and Iraqis, Syrian factions, Kurds, Turkey etc.

Let them fight each other to reduce the number of Muslims worldwide.

You sit, count the money and count the bodies (Muslim and non-Muslim)....

Problem with this plan is that it just takes too long...and in the end you'll not solve the root cause of the problem.

Jihadist ideology is part of Islam that is the root cause.


SUre!
Can't be inequality of wealth and constant exterior destabilization in order to take natural ressources.
Must be Islam.

I mean come on, we all know that the real problem is Islam, and there is a great correlation between the two because as we all know terrorism started with Islam! Wait... Didn't it started after the whole numerous wars in Middle East?

No, can't be that. Can't be our fault.

Yeah it's Islam!


Continue going back in time and you'll eventually see the problem...

If we go back in time what do we see?
Few wars between ottoman empire and west.
Colonization.
Crusades.
Shit like this?
Wanna count the points?
Not sure West is the winner here...

Of course they aren't. The West, as a whole, didn't become an major aggressor in the Middle East until much, much later after it has become rich from wealth pouring from the colonies and has basically surpassed the Muslims in technology. The Crusades are more of an anomaly and bound to fail anyway. The Middle East was already fucked up under the Ottomans, and became fuckedx2 once the borders were drawn when the empire shrunk and became Turkey.
I have never seen the President of America so much in friendly relations with the leaders of the Arab countries. Apparently money is doing its job and financial matters are much more important than the issue of religion or politics in general. So it's better Let it be so than war in delusions.

More like the realities of politics finally caught up to him. This was OK during campaigns to get the people to believe him but cutting off contact would be messy.

And so the SaudiXAmerica love/hate story continues...

If we go back in time what do we see?
Few wars between ottoman empire and west.
Colonization.
Crusades.
Shit like this?
Wanna count the points?
Not sure West is the winner here...

The West will win. Those arabs are divided in every possible way and as the wahhabis and Iran gaining ground, those divisions are getting deeper and deeper every day.

Crusades were a natural answer to the earlier muslim invasion of Europe (Spain, Sicily, France, Italy and the Byzantine territories, Armenia, Georgia). After the beginning or the Reconquista, recapturing Sicily, Malta, Rhodes and Cyprus, bringing the war back to the Middle East was the best defence against further incursions and also relived the pressure on the Byzantine Empire. So the tusken were kept at bay and away from our lands for nearly 200 years what gave us enough time to prepare for the next invasion (ottomans).

The ottomans occupied the whole Balkans, the Romanian principalities, half of Hungary, South Ukraine and repeatedly launched large scale attacks towards the west.

So, mate who used to invade whom?



And now you've allowed them to come in unchecked. Have you seen what's happening here in the Philippines? Plenty of them will not integrate.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: mainpmf on May 25, 2017, 10:14:17 AM
If we go back in time what do we see?
Few wars between ottoman empire and west.
Colonization.
Crusades.
Shit like this?
Wanna count the points?
Not sure West is the winner here...

The West will win. Those arabs are divided in every possible way and as the wahhabis and Iran gaining ground, those divisions are getting deeper and deeper every day.

Crusades were a natural answer to the earlier muslim invasion of Europe (Spain, Sicily, France, Italy and the Byzantine territories, Armenia, Georgia). After the beginning or the Reconquista, recapturing Sicily, Malta, Rhodes and Cyprus, bringing the war back to the Middle East was the best defence against further incursions and also relived the pressure on the Byzantine Empire. So the tusken were kept at bay and away from our lands for nearly 200 years what gave us enough time to prepare for the next invasion (ottomans).

The ottomans occupied the whole Balkans, the Romanian principalities, half of Hungary, South Ukraine and repeatedly launched large scale attacks towards the west.

So, mate who used to invade whom?



Oh if you really want to play historic game you'll have to go back a bit earlier in time :p
Catholic roman empire?
Does it ring a bell in terms of massive invasion? ^^

But my point was never to say "bah we're the evil ones we've started the crusades blame ourselves and let us all kill ourselves in regrets"
Not at all.

My point is that the problem is NOT ISLAM. The problem is that we've been destabilizing, attacking, killing hundreds of thousands of innocents men women and children only to steal them their ressources.
Is it evil? Well it's human nature, I'm not going to judge, and I'm using those ressources.
But islamic extremism is just the consequence of that, there is no reason and no need to feel like we're the victims, that's all I'm saying. They're the victims and we fucked them pretty hard. That's all I'm saying.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Snail2 on May 25, 2017, 10:16:08 AM
Quote
The West will win. Those arabs are divided in every possible way and as the wahhabis and Iran gaining ground, those divisions are getting deeper and deeper every day.

Crusades were a natural answer to the earlier muslim invasion of Europe (Spain, Sicily, France, Italy and the Byzantine territories, Armenia, Georgia). After the beginning or the Reconquista, recapturing Sicily, Malta, Rhodes and Cyprus, bringing the war back to the Middle East was the best defence against further incursions and also relived the pressure on the Byzantine Empire. So the tusken were kept at bay and away from our lands for nearly 200 years what gave us enough time to prepare for the next invasion (ottomans).

The ottomans occupied the whole Balkans, the Romanian principalities, half of Hungary, South Ukraine and repeatedly launched large scale attacks towards the west.

So, mate who used to invade whom?



And now you've allowed them to come in unchecked. Have you seen what's happening here in the Philippines? Plenty of them will not integrate.

No, I didn't. Unfortunately our elected puppets and unelected leaders never asked for my opinion. Actually I doubt that they ever asked for anybody's opinion. Nevermind, the pendulum eventually going to swing back as always did, and then... Well, I guess you know how things used to end for closed and non-integrated communities with distinctive appearance and outfits when some of their members pissing off everybody else.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Masha Sha on May 25, 2017, 10:20:04 AM
I am curious to know what Bitcointalk's opinion is about this.

"Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave cast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays. Hillary must return all money from such countries!"
~Pre-election Trump

To be very honest, I doubt this will make a difference, if Trump supporters could be convinced with reason, they wouldn't have voted for him in the first place.



Melania was angry with trump visit to the harem... she felt threatened.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Snail2 on May 25, 2017, 11:05:53 AM
Oh if you really want to play historic game you'll have to go back a bit earlier in time :p
Catholic roman empire?
Does it ring a bell in terms of massive invasion? ^^

But my point was never to say "bah we're the evil ones we've started the crusades blame ourselves and let us all kill ourselves in regrets"
Not at all.

Yes? And then what? That was the evolution of the pagan Roman Empire. BTW the Romans were pretty much uninterested in Arabia and were allies to the northern arab tribes against the Parthians. So the southern arab tribes could keep fucking goats and fighting for nuts with the squirrels until Muhammed turned up in the 5th century.

Quote
My point is that the problem is NOT ISLAM. The problem is that we've been destabilizing, attacking, killing hundreds of thousands of innocents men women and children only to steal them their ressources.
Is it evil? Well it's human nature, I'm not going to judge, and I'm using those ressources.
But islamic extremism is just the consequence of that, there is no reason and no need to feel like we're the victims, that's all I'm saying. They're the victims and we fucked them pretty hard. That's all I'm saying.

I think you are wrong. Islamic extremism was present from the very beginning and Islam itself is a fertile ground and perfect cause for extremists. There are countless historic examples how muslims massacred, colonized and exploited "unbelievers". Basically it's promoting a system what isn't any better than the Nuremberg Laws. The history of islam is a 1400 year history or imperialism, colonization and bloodshed. I know they trying hard to victimize themselves, but if you take a look at the historical evidence actually in most cases they were the aggressors.

About the ongoing issues I must say, their own leaders sold off their ass to us, of course we fucked them hard. Problems started when the above mentioned leaders tried to screw the deal to divert the growing anger of their hard fucked ppl while in the same time tried to get away with the bag.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: digaran on May 25, 2017, 06:02:09 PM
Not only US people are paying for useless weapons(only use they have is to be delivered to the hands of terrorists like ISIS)
Question is why would they pay $75M for Israel's air defense system?
Any of you really know how many nuclear warheads US has and how much each of them cost?
Either they want to use them or want to scare others not to attack them which both are terrifying.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: bryant.coleman on May 25, 2017, 06:59:47 PM
The Arabs are very clever people. If they're so happy with the deal and even gave Ivanka a 100 million dollars I was very alarming. Sure this deal is worth close examination. Trump an inexperienced politician and I think that for the material gain it may not be seen as a political defeat.

No one gave Ivanka anything. If she wants $100 million, then she can ask her father (or even her husband). The Arabs gave $100 million to some charity, and Ivanka has in the past supported it. Obviously, the rabidly biased mainstream media want to create a mountain out of a molehill, and therefore they went ballistic and claimed that Ivanka received all that money.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: TheCoinGrabber on May 26, 2017, 04:48:23 PM
Oh if you really want to play historic game you'll have to go back a bit earlier in time :p
Catholic roman empire?
Does it ring a bell in terms of massive invasion? ^^

Maybe look up some vids on Youtube that shows the borders as it changed. It was already huge even before Christianity was legalized. If there were military campaigns during the time it was finally Christian-majority (which still took centuries after Constantine), it were continuation of past conflicts with surrounding polities, like Persia for example.

Compare this with Islam. All those conquest was definitely for religion. Unlike Christianity which mainly spread among the lower-class peacefully (heck, they were even fed to lions or impaled and burned on stakes), Islam was spread by the sword, with the army led by no other than Muhammad himself.

And oh, Catholicism came later during the Great Schism.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Sithara007 on May 26, 2017, 05:03:40 PM
Compare this with Islam. All those conquest was definitely for religion. Unlike Christianity which mainly spread among the lower-class peacefully (heck, they were even fed to lions or impaled and burned on stakes), Islam was spread by the sword, with the army led by no other than Muhammad himself.

And oh, Catholicism came later during the Great Schism.

There is not a single country which has voluntarily accepted Islam. In all the nations, Islam was spread using force and genocide. Even now, the same is ongoing, in nations such as Sudan and Pakistan.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: TheCoinGrabber on May 29, 2017, 03:09:35 PM
Compare this with Islam. All those conquest was definitely for religion. Unlike Christianity which mainly spread among the lower-class peacefully (heck, they were even fed to lions or impaled and burned on stakes), Islam was spread by the sword, with the army led by no other than Muhammad himself.

And oh, Catholicism came later during the Great Schism.

There is not a single country which has voluntarily accepted Islam. In all the nations, Islam was spread using force and genocide. Even now, the same is ongoing, in nations such as Sudan and Pakistan.

Well, it was brought through trade first in SE Asia but then it eventually was spread by Islamized polities gobbling up smaller ones in the region. So yeah, it did spread by war.



Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: Sithara007 on May 30, 2017, 06:44:25 AM
Compare this with Islam. All those conquest was definitely for religion. Unlike Christianity which mainly spread among the lower-class peacefully (heck, they were even fed to lions or impaled and burned on stakes), Islam was spread by the sword, with the army led by no other than Muhammad himself.

And oh, Catholicism came later during the Great Schism.

There is not a single country which has voluntarily accepted Islam. In all the nations, Islam was spread using force and genocide. Even now, the same is ongoing, in nations such as Sudan and Pakistan.

Well, it was brought through trade first in SE Asia but then it eventually was spread by Islamized polities gobbling up smaller ones in the region. So yeah, it did spread by war.

How many traders were there? Children born to Arab trader fathers and local women became Muslim (especially in regions such as Indonesia and Malaysia). But the population later increased only through forced conversion, abduction, genocide.etc.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: awesome31312 on June 06, 2017, 05:44:25 AM
Compare this with Islam. All those conquest was definitely for religion. Unlike Christianity which mainly spread among the lower-class peacefully (heck, they were even fed to lions or impaled and burned on stakes), Islam was spread by the sword, with the army led by no other than Muhammad himself.

And oh, Catholicism came later during the Great Schism.

There is not a single country which has voluntarily accepted Islam. In all the nations, Islam was spread using force and genocide. Even now, the same is ongoing, in nations such as Sudan and Pakistan.

The same can be said about Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, and just about any other religion out there.


Title: Re: Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia cost taxpayers $100b
Post by: ClaraLuV on June 06, 2017, 07:57:06 AM
Snip
I really have my doubts in this deal,as there is no contract for a $110 billion deal but the values will be really low,since you are talking about tax payers money which tax payers you are talking about ,Saudi does not have a tax system and they are ones paying the money to US ,so what are you really trying to say here.One thing i know is that it is a billion dollar deal but the exact amount is not known other than the blunt news from the white house . ;D