Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Altcoin Discussion => Topic started by: StinkyLover on June 07, 2017, 09:21:59 PM



Title: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: StinkyLover on June 07, 2017, 09:21:59 PM
For years I've been on here reading people bash the number of alts in existence, but recently (while crypto has been on this ride) I've been reading more mainstream press about cryptos, especially BTC, ETH, and a few others.

One thing I've read more than once is the sentiment that there's not enough bitcoins to go round. Whether bitcoin is divisible to 8 places is kind of irrelevant. The divisible nature of bitcoin is already known. It's something else.

I think people like variety. Bitcoin may reach $100,000 or even $1,000,000 (or maybe even more). I'm also sure that BTC/LTC/DASH/XMR hodlers think the ladder should be pulled up behind them and that all shitcoins below must die.

I'm not talking about all the new cryptoplatforms springing up all around us. Their tokens are not pure currencies. They're blockchain fuel like ETH and XRP.

Ripple, for example, has no roadmap to be used as anything other than interbank. There's no push for consumer adoption. ETH also has no such plans.

So, do we really have enough pure cryptocurrencies to satisfy this entire planet's thirst for a new economy?

Or do we actually need more?


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: co0ler on June 07, 2017, 09:29:52 PM
The concern comes because, like in real life, you can not have two golds, and that's what serious investors worry about. Altcoins may be useful for certain purposes, but once Bitcoin actually establishes itself as a store of value, most of these other cryptos will lose a lot of value.

If something better comes up that fits well for this purpose, it is something beyond the comprehension of most people in this space.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: lockept93 on June 07, 2017, 09:36:56 PM
We do not need more - we need the ONE. Until its find, there will be more trys to be it.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Proxik on June 07, 2017, 09:45:41 PM
We I have seen a change in the latest coins actually, they are no coins anymore but actually they are crowdfunding projects or shares(like the stockmarket) and actually you never can get enough of them because they are all real projects (except for the scams). Like the Wagerr ico is actually just a betting place which need money to start and they collect the money through a blockchain crowdsale...

What we have enough are shitcoins, which have no project, no real back up, just a coin made with the open source code...thats what we have enough


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: ghatts on June 07, 2017, 09:55:41 PM
prob 85% of these are gonna fall off one all crypto goes mainstream, or older/larger companies absorb them.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Weatherby on June 07, 2017, 10:04:06 PM
From my perspective i came into the virtual currency echo system because of bitcoin and i only care about bitcoin and its development and i was against the forming of new currencies and there was a storm of new currencies which copied the entire code of bitcoin and changing the name and launching it as a new coin,that practice still continues,most of them are dead and some are still here,but another part is the amount of money you are able to make with these alts since the market is always moving higher makes me think other wise .


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: StinkyLover on June 07, 2017, 10:07:56 PM
The concern comes because, like in real life, you can not have two golds, and that's what serious investors worry about. Altcoins may be useful for certain purposes, but once Bitcoin actually establishes itself as a store of value, most of these other cryptos will lose a lot of value.

If something better comes up that fits well for this purpose, it is something beyond the comprehension of most people in this space.

I get that, but currencies are not gold. We have many currencies. Why is gold not a currency? Because there is not enough to go round the whole planet unless everybody has a very tiny piece of it. It is also not good for certain purposes because of it's malleability. That's why we use iron, tin, aluminium, copper, brass, titanium etc. They all have different properties and uses. No one metal suits all the purposes of all metals.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: StinkyLover on June 07, 2017, 10:15:52 PM
We I have seen a change in the latest coins actually, they are no coins anymore but actually they are crowdfunding projects or shares(like the stockmarket) and actually you never can get enough of them because they are all real projects (except for the scams). Like the Wagerr ico is actually just a betting place which need money to start and they collect the money through a blockchain crowdsale...

What we have enough are shitcoins, which have no project, no real back up, just a coin made with the open source code...thats what we have enough

Why?

Maybe we need more of these. Pure open source tokens to be used only as currencies. Does every cryptocurrency have to have some backend blockchain purpose? Does every crypto need to be able to store documents or unlock a car door? What about buying groceries? What backend extra is needed there?

Other than currency, what use do FIAT coins have? What else can you do with FIAT coins?

As long as the blockchain is working correctly (i.e. it's not dead) then the shitcoins of today may have a part to play in the future.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: StinkyLover on June 07, 2017, 10:20:48 PM
prob 85% of these are gonna fall off one all crypto goes mainstream, or older/larger companies absorb them.

That's the thing. While scam devs here are playing games for the short term, are we letting down the consumer who's waiting for some stability and enough supply? 85% dying should not be celebrated maybe.

Maybe their death is also the industry's slow death because there's not enough to go round, so nobody wants them.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: StinkyLover on June 07, 2017, 10:23:13 PM
From my perspective i came into the virtual currency echo system because of bitcoin and i only care about bitcoin and its development and i was against the forming of new currencies and there was a storm of new currencies which copied the entire code of bitcoin and changing the name and launching it as a new coin,that practice still continues,most of them are dead and some are still here,but another part is the amount of money you are able to make with these alts since the market is always moving higher makes me think other wise .

If they do not die then there's more profit for everybody. If they are kept alive for the future then it's better for everybody when the consumer starts to adopt, no? Yes?


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: StinkyLover on June 07, 2017, 10:37:25 PM
We're getting to the point where we have crypto platforms for almost anything you can think of. The top 50 is full of interesting projects, but we also need coins to spend. Coins to walk into the store, spend, and walk out. Nothing more.

Shitcoins may be the blockchain killer app that we're all spitting on. Look at bitcoin. It's number 1.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Weatherby on June 07, 2017, 10:38:08 PM
If they do not die then there's more profit for everybody. If they are kept alive for the future then it's better for everybody when the consumer starts to adopt, no? Yes?
The reason i think for the current surge of alt coin market is simply because people are finding it difficult to invest in a high market like bitcoin and they are investing in alt coins and then converting it to bitcoin ,if all the shit coins are adopted then it is good for the developers as they are having a good time with the shell they have created and the amount of money they are making are just crazy and for this single reason we are seeing new coins and tokens popping up every now and then. :)


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 08, 2017, 04:53:03 AM
uuuugh jeez man.

The point to a currency is usage.
So how the fucking hell is a currency even going to work if each person has the own coin ?

FAIL.

That is not how currencies work guys.. this shit failed bad.. game over.

I find it pretty damn funny there is 4,500 users when i recently looked at night here..
Then in the day time i seen 8,500 roughly logged in.
Meanwhile there is 1 million+ accounts and over 10,000 ANN topics.

ALTCOINS  :D

PS:
I predicted it too way back.
Back when this story was out.. http://www.coindesk.com/need-altcoins-can-get/


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: StinkyLover on June 08, 2017, 05:37:55 AM
uuuugh jeez man.

The point to a currency is usage.
So how the fucking hell is a currency even going to work if each person has the own coin ?

FAIL.

That is not how currencies work guys.. this shit failed bad.. game over.

I find it pretty damn funny there is 4,500 users when i recently looked at night here..
Then in the day time i seen 8,500 roughly logged in.
Meanwhile there is 1 million+ accounts and over 10,000 ANN topics.

ALTCOINS  :D

PS:
I predicted it too way back.
Back when this story was out.. http://www.coindesk.com/need-altcoins-can-get/

Why is asking such a question a fail? The link you posted demonstrates that the topic has been up for discussion for years.

Why is 'more coins' not the way currency works? How does currency work?

I'm not saying everybody should have their own coin. I'm just asking if we have enough coins for a new global economy. We may need even more than we have now.

Nobody on this site can predict, or know what's going to happen, or why it should. The possibility of BTC on it's own taking over the planet as the only crypto is now seen as a laughable concept. A few years ago it was seen as gospel truth by BTC evangelists. What happened to that idea/concept? It's now gone forever. Reality has thrown that idea out of the window. You yourself even support the 'shitcoin' that is called LTC.

You've predicted the death of DOGE for years, yet it still thrives, and now new DOGE services are starting to emerge again. People are still predicting the death of ETH but it's still growing. All predictions I've seen have been shown to be wrong. The only workable predictions are predicting gains and losses with individual cryptos. Nobody has correctly predicted the evolution of crypto. We are all watching and waiting as the industry grows.

Anything seems to be possible as the end game in the evolutionary path of crypto. Imagine if mainstream adoption suddenly occurs in 4 years time. How many coins will exist by then? Most likely more than exist today, and even then, more may be needed.

Here on this site people (understandably) want as few cryptos as possible only because that will maximise the profit on each bag they hold. What if that's not the way the new global economy is going to work, no matter how much we early crypto adopters want it to?


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 08, 2017, 05:44:23 AM
Did you really not get what i just said ?
I am not sure i could put it any other way....... again.
As i have been saying EVERY DAY since that story came out (and on that very story via Disqus)

A currency works 1 way.
That is all there is to it.
Otherwise it's not a currency.

And i will tell ya another thing.. AGAIN.
If the coin is not adopted then it's not a currency.
A currency has to be adopted and used as such to be one.

You don't need to be a rocket doctor to get this either.. it's pretty simple stuff guys.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Herbert2020 on June 08, 2017, 06:15:20 AM
One thing I've read more than once is the sentiment that there's not enough bitcoins to go round. Whether bitcoin is divisible to 8 places is kind of irrelevant. The divisible nature of bitcoin is already known. It's something else.
yes it is something else, it is people not understanding how big that number is.
there are 2,100,000,000,000,000 units available and usable. and if anything happened and we needed more, for example because of an extremely large adoption, or a very large amount of coins lost or something like that we can still fork to a new chain which 0.1 satoshi becomes valid.

Quote
So, do we really have enough pure cryptocurrencies to satisfy this entire planet's thirst for a new economy?

Or do we actually need more?
as far as your first statement about bitcoin goes, as i explained we do have enough.

but as for your secondary kind of question, the cryptocurrency technology that bitcoin introduces is such a huge field to explore and innovate so we will never have enough. there will always going to be new cryptocurrencies being created and try new aspects and new ideas in this field.
- so many will fail
- so many will be copycats
- so many will not even be cryptocurrency, they will be pump and dumps

we may not see it happen today or for years in the future, but it is happening. there have been a lot of good improvements, the fact that they turned into ashes because of pump and dumps doesn't change the future.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: ApexEvo on June 08, 2017, 06:42:02 AM
This is a self regulating market built mostly on speculation. People are mostly here for these speculations and looking for new ways to grab each other's money. Think of it as an ongoing battle with constant reinforcements coming in in the form of new money and new battlefields opening up all the time in the form of new coins. That said, I don't think there is such a thing as "enough cryptocurrencies".


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Wapfika on June 08, 2017, 02:38:45 PM
I think we already have enough cryptocurrencies.  That's why when you already have one or more, you just have to support  it and please be serious on having it.

There are lots of cryptocurrenies out and there are still new invented alts.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 08, 2017, 03:08:53 PM
I think the OP here meant how many separate distinct unrelated coins.
Hinting that the total supply of some of them may not be enough.
Well there is a reason the FED reserve uses Quantitative Easing etc.

Let me put it this way guys.
Many of you are advocating that we all have as many Internets as possible.
Problem is they are not connected to each other.
So what then ?

Then it's not an internet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet

Quote
The Internet is the global system of interconnected computer networks that use the Internet protocol suite (TCP/IP) to link devices worldwide.

So the same exact thing is playing out here in crypto..
It is of no use at all losing an adopter of the Internet to Lan users here.

I am the one who said this.
As usual I am the smart one.
I had to say this in 2013 and ever since over & over.
And it's sad because it common fucking sense guys.
And really i am not very smart ..it's just in crypto i look like a genius.
Because the crowd overall is really THAT stupid & greedy.

So..
Having more & more "coins" will simply make the adoption problem worse & worse.. duh right ?


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Zadicar on June 08, 2017, 03:17:20 PM
For years I've been on here reading people bash the number of alts in existence, but recently (while crypto has been on this ride) I've been reading more mainstream press about cryptos, especially BTC, ETH, and a few others.

One thing I've read more than once is the sentiment that there's not enough bitcoins to go round. Whether bitcoin is divisible to 8 places is kind of irrelevant. The divisible nature of bitcoin is already known. It's something else.

I think people like variety. Bitcoin may reach $100,000 or even $1,000,000 (or maybe even more). I'm also sure that BTC/LTC/DASH/XMR hodlers think the ladder should be pulled up behind them and that all shitcoins below must die.

I'm not talking about all the new cryptoplatforms springing up all around us. Their tokens are not pure currencies. They're blockchain fuel like ETH and XRP.

Ripple, for example, has no roadmap to be used as anything other than interbank. There's no push for consumer adoption. ETH also has no such plans.

So, do we really have enough pure cryptocurrencies to satisfy this entire planet's thirst for a new economy?

Or do we actually need more?
We dont need anymore because most alts that do launch have almost identical on specs or features but we would really expect that there would be even more because even theres bitcoin and other alts we are still searching for a coin that can be really changed in the things that we do like to be changed.This is reality and we can stop people on creating their own coin.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 08, 2017, 03:23:30 PM
People do keep making them.. and i have no interest in stopping them.
What i take issue with is the facade that they are "coins"
AKA: a currency.

They can't be if they are not used as such.

And none of them are.
So if they aren't then what are they then ?
A fake currency traded on Poloniex for nothing at all but profits.

And how do people get profits ?
By starting a new one over & over and buying the coins cheap then dumping then on the next schmuck.

AKA: The greater fools game.

This shit is a fucked up pathetic joke  ::)
And i refuse to contribute to the rape of the word "currency"
She has had enough.. get off her you dirty pigs before i call the cops !  :-[

You are all god damn crypto-rapists !


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Thelmassey on June 08, 2017, 03:29:41 PM
I think there is enough for now, coz now there are ICOs almost everyday. We going to end up not knowing which ones to use or invest in


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: myternity on June 08, 2017, 03:36:04 PM
I think there is enough for now, coz now there are ICOs almost everyday. We going to end up not knowing which ones to use or invest in
Because we can choose the most trustful ICOs and not all of them are good. Obviously we need more... MORE ALTCOINS TO THE GOD OF ALTCOINS! ;D :D


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: McWorse on June 08, 2017, 03:38:03 PM
We need more coins.
Because behind every serious coin is standing a new idea.
And new ideas are the fuel for technical evolution.

To say, that we do not need new ideas, means nothing less than stagnation and regression.
No thanks!


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: nizamcc on June 08, 2017, 04:55:34 PM
I think there is enough for now, coz now there are ICOs almost everyday. We going to end up not knowing which ones to use or invest in

No, we can't. Altcoins are nothing different than newer and better ideas over Bitcoins' protocol and by adding up to some new algorithms, devs are creating something new everytime they create an alt. It completely depends upon how we react and adapt to those coins, there should be a coin for each need that we have, like something for food, some alt for music, some for security and there should be much more needed to maintain the balance that will be shaken when the whole world will enter this crypto world and coins will be less.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: kraterion on June 08, 2017, 05:11:44 PM
We need more crypto currencies? Probably not
We need more tech based on blockchains? Absolutely yes, the world will be more and more digitalized


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 09, 2017, 08:16:53 AM
I think there is enough for now, coz now there are ICOs almost everyday. We going to end up not knowing which ones to use or invest in

..yup THATS the problem  ::)



I think there is enough for now, coz now there are ICOs almost everyday. We going to end up not knowing which ones to use or invest in

No, we can't. Altcoins are nothing different than newer and better ideas over Bitcoins' protocol and by adding up to some new algorithms, devs are creating something new everytime they create an alt. It completely depends upon how we react and adapt to those coins, there should be a coin for each need that we have, like something for food, some alt for music, some for security and there should be much more needed to maintain the balance that will be shaken when the whole world will enter this crypto world and coins will be less.



Yup soooooo much ICO profits "innovation"  ::)

The only thing there is more of than "coins" here is the amount of times i have put something in quotes then posted the rolleyes.jpeg emoticon then called you all stupid.

I think the reason i come here is i am simply flabbergasted at the level of raw god damn stupidity that permeates this shithole scene and how you all have sooooooooooooo much free money to burn on scammy ass pointless bullshit for the slight chance of dem ROI'z on teh exchanger with yur profits coinz.

Nothing ever changes.
You all act like morons then i point and laugh and you start a new topic pushing on with the dipshittery.

Nothing i ever posted was debunked or denied or refuted.
You can't ..because i am always right.

There is two people here.. the guys eating popcorn watching the idiots walk into the wall for amusement and the idiots with a sore head.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: rudystyle on June 09, 2017, 08:24:55 AM
I think we have enough. Most of the tokens built on ethereum have very little utility and hardly any of the projects have had any kind of mass adoption.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Adbitco on June 09, 2017, 08:51:11 AM
What we need is not more cryptocurrencies but the supporters for each of them. Almost each and every day a new coin is introduced in the market and after sometime most of them disappear so in my opinion we need to be serious about whatever cryptocurrency we hold and show our interest in. We need to build a sustainable ecosystem for each of these cryptocurrencies.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: unusualfacts30 on June 09, 2017, 09:06:54 AM
As someone said, we need more supporters not more altcoins. Adoption will be very difficult if there are billions of altcoins for every different purpose.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Blamsud on June 09, 2017, 09:26:09 AM
As someone said, we need more supporters not more altcoins. Adoption will be very difficult if there are billions of altcoins for every different purpose.

More supporters will happen in time,now that lots of company were trying to adopt it and many investor were putting effort on it.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: The Goat Master on June 09, 2017, 10:48:59 AM
I think we need thousands of TOKENs  ;)


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 09, 2017, 11:54:56 AM
As someone said, we need more supporters not more altcoins. Adoption will be very difficult if there are billions of altcoins for every different purpose.

More supporters will happen in time,now that lots of company were trying to adopt it and many investor were putting effort on it.

I came back here planning on posting a specific comment..
KNOWING full well what you guys were going to say BEFORE YOU DID.

TIME..

I have already been here YEARS waiting for this so called "adoption" before you got here to tell me to wait..

You all want me to keep waiting while you all pile in to buy THE NEXT COIN.. for profits on the exchanger.

Problem is..
You all didn't come here to support adoption of a currency.
You showed up for 1 single reason.. to make money off alternative-use crypto related ICO schemes for money.
And that has nothing at all to do with adoption.

You are all doing NOTHING to further adoption.
You are simply watching your profits on Polo then screaming buy buy buy on the Trollbox.

A facade.. as illustrated by a never ending stream of noob accounts with a weak grasp on English.
I would bet my left net more than half of all these noobs are from India.. "my friend"

lambs to the slaughter.. whale food ultimately.
I seen it go down years ago during the big rush and it's happening all over again.
I walked away from the table while all of you are at the Doge table still "letting it ride" permanently as you investment gamble (as you all just out it on a another topic just now)


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: olubams on June 09, 2017, 12:09:06 PM
After reading what you have there, I made the conclusion that you only focus on the few alt that have been able to get the attention of quite a percentage of the population of the crypto world however, ignoring the developing ones that could have the potential of the main ONE. Aside that, I hold the believe that without all this coins, I feel the pressure that would be on bitcoin would be to much to handle thereby leading it to its early grave. In as much as the already coins available is not meeting expectations I still feel we need them to provide the needed balance for the established ones.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: ChinkyEyes on June 09, 2017, 12:28:31 PM
I see having more cryptocurrencies as healthy competition. In which everyone wants to differentiate from each other in order to become the one coin we will be using in the future to buy our groceries and such. This competition to become number one will result in more technical innovations which will all be adapted by the one coin we will use in the future.


People losing money on crypto now should just go home and stop acting like they are wolfs on wallstreet. Don't invest money you cannot afford to lose.



Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: densuj on June 09, 2017, 12:37:19 PM
I think we need thousands of TOKENs  ;)
No, right now many cryptocurrencies out there to be used for payment method, almost all of them has good developers, comunity and investors to be currency on real life and for daily transaction, we don't needs other altcoins just for getting money in altcoins and become scam coins in the future, it will makes bad to digital coins on public.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: The Goat Master on June 09, 2017, 01:30:01 PM
I think we need thousands of TOKENs  ;)
No, right now many cryptocurrencies out there to be used for payment method, almost all of them has good developers, comunity and investors to be currency on real life and for daily transaction, we don't needs other altcoins just for getting money in altcoins and become scam coins in the future, it will makes bad to digital coins on public.
Well, especially I said token. IMO lots of digital/pyscihal things will be tokenizing. I don't see them typical altcoin or payment method.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: 2econd on June 09, 2017, 02:10:16 PM
Holy hell yes, we have enough, we have plenty, we have too many...

Especially since 90% or more is absolutely worthless (as a project perhaps not in price).

Let a few giants arise and let the rest die off in silence. Bitcoin can die too for all I care. It belongs mostly to the wealthy (thought that was not what crypto was about) and it's highly inefficient compared to other crypto's as well.

Just keeping it nr.1 because it was nr.1 seems silly if you ask me.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: DRaGoN RaNTaRo on June 09, 2017, 02:54:45 PM
We need more coins.
Because behind every serious coin is standing a new idea.
And new ideas are the fuel for technical evolution.

To say, that we do not need new ideas, means nothing less than stagnation and regression.
No thanks!
I would like to hear from you about ten coins which have outstanding technology ,what we have mostly in the alt coin space is ETH tokens and a very few core technical coins,you can have an idea but that does not mean you have to start a coin because you have an idea. :P


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Ayers on June 09, 2017, 02:56:41 PM
i think yes but people liek to get quick cash, and will repeat their scammy coin endless until they are rich, this place is becoming a way to be rich fast, and many have figured this already, and also this thing cannot be stopped, no matter you do, a good start would be to close the ann section, but people will make their ow altcoin forum then, the traffic would be lower than this one but still accessible


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 09, 2017, 09:49:22 PM
I see having more cryptocurrencies as healthy competition. In which everyone wants to differentiate from each other in order to become the one coin we will be using in the future to buy our groceries and such. This competition to become number one will result in more technical innovations which will all be adapted by the one coin we will use in the future.


People losing money on crypto now should just go home and stop acting like they are wolfs on wallstreet. Don't invest money you cannot afford to lose.



This isn't wallstreet and creating thousands and thousands of coins is retarded.
There is more ANN topics here than people logged in at once daily.
So when it comes to the ACTUAL POINT OF A CURRENCY.. no it's pure fail.

Wallstreet is regulated.. this is just a scammy digital pyramid scheme charade.
Don't confuse the two profiteers.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: jpoker272727 on June 09, 2017, 11:20:53 PM
Never is enough because many things are yet being developed and many cryptocurrencies are just as copy paste of others (mostly) and what's the difference is the logo, the description and maybe the team.

The main concern is to make money and probably put the people in a game to invest there and maybe scam them by dumping the price until 1 satoshi which we have seen this scenario many times.

At the other side is good to see that there are many cryptocurrencies because are giving some unique features and this is increasing the competition between them.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Armstand on June 09, 2017, 11:44:13 PM
Never is enough because many things are yet being developed and many cryptocurrencies are just as copy paste of others (mostly) and what's the difference is the logo, the description and maybe the team.

The main concern is to make money and probably put the people in a game to invest there and maybe scam them by dumping the price until 1 satoshi which we have seen this scenario many times.

At the other side is good to see that there are many cryptocurrencies because are giving some unique features and this is increasing the competition between them.

That's why there are a lot of new increasing alt coin,they were developing and having a potential in the near future,people dont have contentment, therefore there are more who will be interested on creating new one again .


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: jpoker272727 on June 09, 2017, 11:55:16 PM
Never is enough because many things are yet being developed and many cryptocurrencies are just as copy paste of others (mostly) and what's the difference is the logo, the description and maybe the team.

The main concern is to make money and probably put the people in a game to invest there and maybe scam them by dumping the price until 1 satoshi which we have seen this scenario many times.

At the other side is good to see that there are many cryptocurrencies because are giving some unique features and this is increasing the competition between them.

That's why there are a lot of new increasing alt coin,they were developing and having a potential in the near future,people dont have contentment, therefore there are more who will be interested on creating new one again .

Creating new altcoins has been easy or at least if you have the right money an altcoin can be created within a short period of time with a small team.

But what happens is the people want to become rich immediately without thinking about the future, about the roadmap and the long-term goals of that altcoin.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Mazt rhiezt on June 10, 2017, 01:52:27 AM
Actually for now it is more than enough, with evidence that many ordinary people now become very rich after getting to know the crypto world. It can be said that the value of new coins in the world of crypto is very cheap when compared with other investments due to the rapid increase altcoin. It keeps growing. And certainly will continue to increase the value of BTC and ETH if we continue to let them follow our lives until later.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: CryptoDatabase on June 10, 2017, 01:55:30 AM
There are over 20,000 coins out there, I would say that is more than enough and way too much. All of the world currencies combined and multiplied by 1000 still don't come close to the amount of cryptocurrencies there are.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 10, 2017, 04:10:32 AM
I've heard the retort "innovation" used for years.
Ok , fine.. I'll play along LOL

Get this guys ;)
You can actually go take one of the thousands of EXISTING coins and use that to mod the code and add all this uber leet innovations i am always hearing about.

There is no need to create a new coin most of the time.

So why would you ?

Duh.. so you can be Satoshi and get the coins for almost free (then wait till it goes up and dump)

Quit playing stupid guys.
You are not smart and Earth gove 0 fucks.
You are not fooling anyone.. sure as hell not me LOL
I've heard it all !

I had the HYPE dick heads feed me excuses for example about the High Stake POS coin they unleashed for example and i told them if you needed to run an "Experiment" then why didn't you use Test Net ?
Why did you have to release a scammy clone that mimic'd CENT/Pennies ?
I told the idiots YOU KNEW DAMN WELL WHAT THE RESULT WAS GOING TO BE.
There was no reason at all to create another version of it and have it added to Poloniex.

The crew behind that one was the Poloniex / Monero crypto-MOB.
You will see the same "crypto friends" supporting the same exact coins running the same scam over & over.

I know one well known guy who invited me in on premining the coin with his friends.
I said no thanks of course but yeah.. added to Poloniex of course.
You'd kind of have to wonder why ?
Why is Polo willing to add all this crap ?
Why did they add XMR markets when Monero came out ?

You idiots out there don't realize you are simply bafoons being played by cartels.
Organized groups that run the show here all along..
You will see them against me or siding with me depending on which coin i "FUD" too.
But at the end of the day it's all still the same usual suspects making endless coins for profits.

And since you CAN co-opt the dregs of society with chump change the bullshit keeps rolling on.

If you don't see the facade going on you are fucking blind.
You didn't need to be here YEARS watching all these guys to see the bullshit going down.

There are no excuses for making an endless stream of new coins.
You are not fooling anyone.
It's a circle jerk for the already co-opted dregs here.
Preaching to the profiteer choir is a waste of time.

You think 99% of planet earth consider an ICO coin #5,432 legit ?
Innovation ? "coin" ? ohh that is rich hahahaha LOL  :D


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: akirasendo17 on June 10, 2017, 05:12:56 AM
we have lots they just hold it , and im sure until now they are holding it


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: xuan87 on June 10, 2017, 05:23:00 AM
I think we already have enough crypto currencies,in fact we already got too many coins, it caused the alt coin potential grow become low because the investment is spread all over the coin, and some of the coin doesn't got anything to attract the crowd, we need only few crypto coin but a strong one with different features


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: adhitthana on June 10, 2017, 05:45:55 AM
The more the merrier. The more experimentation the better


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 10, 2017, 07:29:16 AM
The more the merrier. The more experimentation the better

As a greedy profiteer then you guys should see the pros and cons of the matter.

Pro = Less coins means the people buying coins would have to buy an existing one and not a new one coming out soon.
AKA: Market saturation is NOT a good thing  ::)
Your profits are diluted.. you enjoy your Coke a Cola watered down 90% ?

Con = There is negative consequences from creating too many.
Do i need to outline them yet again ?
If i am going to get ignored then there is no point is there ?  :D

Your comment is like saying a bullet in the head is good..
And uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh why now ?
ahhhh i see........ cause you said so LOL

And "experiment" ?
With what different meme jpeg's ?

Doing the same thing over & over and expecting a different result means what now ?
Not sure why but you all elected me smartest person in crypto.
No one else is saying what i say.  8)


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: chineseprancing on June 10, 2017, 08:20:03 AM
My crytocurrencies was enough for my needed, but for the other purposes I think my crytocurrencies was not enough. However, I have made investment for the future needed I have earn crytocurrencies.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: scribbles on June 10, 2017, 12:29:28 PM
Yes, yes, yes and YES!

Over a 1000 crypto's? Yes it's enough, gimme 10 to 50 great ones and kill off the rest please.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 11, 2017, 04:16:44 AM
What happens when you print too much money ?
Saying the more the better ?
And you are an investor ?

This place houses the stupidest people on the face of earth.  ::)


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: wnfmzm74 on June 11, 2017, 05:58:46 AM
yeah,you can see that more new coin release,
but you also should know that more old coin is died
no team to develop,it's so normal


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 11, 2017, 07:04:21 AM
yeah,you can see that more new coin release,
but you also should know that more old coin is died
no team to develop,it's so normal

People have said that about Litecoin for example.. and it worked all along.
And all along 100 gazillion times i told the idiot greedy retarded "investers" that..
It works.
So you use it morons.

In crypto if you don't keep changing the code they cry that the coin is dead.
Does it work ?
Then whats your problem ?

I know what it is.. you are greedy profiteers looking for some big announcement to get you thinking the coin will shoot up in price over night.
It has nothing to do with a coin being usable or not.

And being a coder myself i know that constantly changing working code is asking for problems.
If it works your best off just leaving it the fuck alone.
It's too easy to get carried away screwing around with shit and make things worse.
Hell half the programs i have on windows i stopped updating years ago because dev's fuck them all up.

I've posted this retort a 1,000 times.
You all post the same dumb shit and i rape it.
Your little retorts are dead and i am smarter than all of you combined.
I have your whole play-book memorized.
I know all your defenses and know what you are going to say before you do !

Like shit look at this NOOBS quote i posted then look at the topic title then look at one of my last comments on this topic..
Uhhhhmmm we need more & more coins why ?
Because old coins are dead ?
What in the fuck did i just say ?
Uhh go update the old coin and take it over ?

LOL

There is no retorts you haven't posted that i have not already demolished over the years.
Hell even if you simply wanted money the very idea of making too many coins conflicts with that too.
There is literally no upside at all to making "the more the merrier"
It does no good for anyone regardless of their agenda.

What crypto needs is not more coins but smart people because the intelligence level is shockingly low.
Don' believe me ?
Well, then go read the "road map" and white paper for FIAT.
Yup it's dead too ..no "innovation"
and it's not "fun" either.  :'(


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: 2bfree on June 11, 2017, 07:09:40 AM
Freedom and the free market are the answer to alt-coin. Maybe we have to many and maybe we have to few. Let the free market decide! That's what freedom is all about!


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: CryptoDatabase on June 11, 2017, 07:49:23 AM
yeah,you can see that more new coin release,
but you also should know that more old coin is died
no team to develop,it's so normal

People have said that about Litecoin for example.. and it worked all along.
And all along 100 gazillion times i told the idiot greedy retarded "investers" that..
It works.
So you use it morons.

In crypto if you don't keep changing the code they cry that the coin is dead.
Does it work ?
Then whats your problem ?

I know what it is.. you are greedy profiteers looking for some big announcement to get you thinking the coin will shoot up in price over night.
It has nothing to do with a coin being usable or not.

And being a coder myself i know that constantly changing working code is asking for problems.
If it works your best off just leaving it the fuck alone.
It's too easy to get carried away screwing around with shit and make things worse.
Hell half the programs i have on windows i stopped updating years ago because dev's fuck them all up.

I've posted this retort a 1,000 times.
You all post the same dumb shit and i rape it.
Your little retorts are dead and i am smarter than all of you combined.
I have your whole play-book memorized.
I know all your defenses and know what you are going to say before you do !

Like shit look at this NOOBS quote i posted then look at the topic title then look at one of my last comments on this topic..
Uhhhhmmm we need more & more coins why ?
Because old coins are dead ?
What in the fuck did i just say ?
Uhh go update the old coin and take it over ?

LOL

There is no retorts you haven't posted that i have not already demolished over the years.
Hell even if you simply wanted money the very idea of making too many coins conflicts with that too.
There is literally no upside at all to making "the more the merrier"
It does no good for anyone regardless of their agenda.

What crypto needs is not more coins but smart people because the intelligence level is shockingly low.
Don' believe me ?
Well, then go read the "road map" and white paper for FIAT.
Yup it's dead too ..no "innovation"
and it's not "fun" either.  :'(

Without these coins BTC wouldn't have anything to be traded against outside fiat and would be worth way, way less so you are just spouting nonsense straight out of your ass like you normally do.

The only thing you have right is the amount of dumbass retards on this forum and you are one of them.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 11, 2017, 08:27:40 AM
Nonsense ?
You didn't refute anything i claimed.
The two of you simply tried two more angles.
I'll give you some credit though your attempt was creative yet still a fail though.
I don't think i heard that one yet because it's blatantly stupid in so many ways.

The Noobs retort was a cliche though.. i played the "Free market" dance already LOL

So uhhhh ?
By your assertion the more bullshit pointless shitcoins we make the more Bitcoin will go up in price huh ?

Get crackin' boy & girls you heard the man  :D


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: CryptoDatabase on June 11, 2017, 08:39:45 AM
Nonsense ?
You didn't refute anything i claimed.
The two of you simply tried two more angles.
I'll give you some credit though your attempt was creative yet still a fail though.
I don't think i heard that one yet because it's blatantly stupid in so many ways.

The Noobs retort was a cliche though.. i played the "Free market" dance already LOL

So uhhhh ?
By your assertion the more bullshit pointless shitcoins we make the more Bitcoin will go up in price huh ?

Get crackin' boy & girls you heard the man  :D

Basic economics shouldn't have to be explained on a forum that is based on financial creations.. If you want someone to hold your hand and guide you through it like a child then I would recommend using Google, they will help you with anything you want to know about what I said.



Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: agatha818 on June 11, 2017, 10:26:16 PM
The world have enough crypto currency sir, however there are still a lot of crypto currencies coming out.  some are good, some are ok, some are just meh.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 12, 2017, 05:36:46 AM
The world have enough crypto currency sir, however there are still a lot of crypto currencies coming out.  some are good, some are ok, some are just meh.

Yeah ?
Open your wallet.. how many different "currencies" you see in there.
One ?

You have a special section for "fun" currencies ?

Oops my bad.. sorry i forgot this is the scammy unregulated New York Stock exchanger profits coins fan club.
Sorry i forgot these tokens were "assets" and you are "investors"

Each and every one of you here is an exhausting moron.  ::)
You are here jiggling your little dick-holsters about currencies but don't have the faintest clue what a fucking currency even is.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: CryptoDatabase on June 12, 2017, 06:00:51 AM
The world have enough crypto currency sir, however there are still a lot of crypto currencies coming out.  some are good, some are ok, some are just meh.

Yeah ?
Open your wallet.. how many different "currencies" you see in there.
One ?

You have a special section for "fun" currencies ?

Oops my bad.. sorry i forgot this is the scammy unregulated New York Stock exchanger profits coins fan club.
Sorry i forgot these tokens were "assets" and you are "investors"

Each and every one of you here is an exhausting moron.  ::)
You are here jiggling your little dick-holsters about currencies but don't have the faintest clue what a fucking currency even is.

A currency is an object used as a medium for exchange. Seeing as the largest cryptocurrency is barely even used as a currency then a stock asset is a more appropriate term for coins. Stocks are imaginary assets traded for fiat and well what do you know, so are cryptocurrencies.

Your bullshit is becoming even more amusing though, do continue with it. You have no idea what you are talking about and that is just fine, we need people like you to keep imagining cryptos are real currencies.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 12, 2017, 08:31:04 AM
The world have enough crypto currency sir, however there are still a lot of crypto currencies coming out.  some are good, some are ok, some are just meh.

Yeah ?
Open your wallet.. how many different "currencies" you see in there.
One ?

You have a special section for "fun" currencies ?

Oops my bad.. sorry i forgot this is the scammy unregulated New York Stock exchanger profits coins fan club.
Sorry i forgot these tokens were "assets" and you are "investors"

Each and every one of you here is an exhausting moron.  ::)
You are here jiggling your little dick-holsters about currencies but don't have the faintest clue what a fucking currency even is.

A currency is an object used as a medium for exchange. Seeing as the largest cryptocurrency is barely even used as a currency then a stock asset is a more appropriate term for coins. Stocks are imaginary assets traded for fiat and well what do you know, so are cryptocurrencies.

Your bullshit is becoming even more amusing though, do continue with it. You have no idea what you are talking about and that is just fine, we need people like you to keep imagining cryptos are real currencies.

Ya but Bitcoin *IS* though.
So you are spouting off the most posted Altcoin cliche in history.
It's the #1 go to defense when it comes to adoption of an Alt-"coin" and BTC itself.

You all ever wonder why i put "coin" in quotes so much ?
Because you butchered and raped it's dead corpse.
You seriously don't know what the fuck it means or you're are bullshitting. (for Bitcoin profits)

Not only has BTC historically been far more used as a currency but it also holds the most potential at being used as one too.. which is a key reason why it's the yard stick against every little shit coin scheme (for BTC profits) that comes out.

And sorry but just because you feel Bitcoin has not had *enough* adoption..
does not mean your shitcoin bullshit is anymore legit.
The comparison is if you even want to call it that is irrelevant.

What i have posted non stop forever is simply common sense.
You all try and refute it over & over so you can hop on some shitcoin bullshit and count your profits.
You fire off the same old stupid ass bullshit fucking excuses all year round.. year after year and i put them down hard every fucking damn time ...with 100% perfection.

Not one of you lippy greedy little idiots out there ever won fuck all with me here.
And you can't !

Because i am talking about the obvious and common sense people.

How many times do i have to tell you, you aren't fooling anybody ?
Your shitcoin retorts are preaching to the choir.. and even they know it's fucking bullshit.
And like every fucking word that comes out of my mouth i can prove it rock solid with tangible proof.
While you all continue to putter around spewing stupid bullshit.

I posted a topic in ALT/Main asking if people believed in the purpose/intent of Ethereum.
The votes came in and 70% of the users here do *NOT*.
The very shills flogging this stupid ICO scam coin (that is ranked no. 2 in crypto) they THEMSELVES do not believe in the fucking scammy bullshit.

AKA: Proof Investards --> [POLL] Do you believe in Ethereum ? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1652509.0)

You are all a bunch of bullshitters hopping from one scheme to another endlessly for profits.
What ever trendy bullshit rolls out you drop to your knees mouths wallets open wide.
You are full of it !
You hope from an APP's gimmick coin to a Blogging gimmick coin to an ANON gimmick coin
on and on and on.. fer teh profits exchanger ROI'z

You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.

Period .

I have schooled your dumb ass's for years here and you never learn.
Funny enough though is if i was one of you i'd be doing a better job of it.
I could hand to you on a silver platter a far higher quality shitcoin defense to use but that would not be wise now would it ?

Like what ?

Rather than coveting Bitcoin profits and not shutting up about it on every topic and using Bitcoin is horrible garbage etc to defend your scammy shitcoin bullshit.. (example = see quote above)

I would say ?
I would rattle of my favorite DAPPS by name i use ALL THE TIME ..everyday.

But guess what Investards ?
Not even one of you have said that................ even once.
Not even lied and made up one to "make it look good" ..because you are all THAT stupid.

All you all do is harp and grind and whail away endlessly 24/7 about BITCOIN PROFITS in conjunction with how Scamereum is so great and it will take over for BTC etc..
So.. you know.. pay me BTC for my ETH ahhahahhaha

You all think you are smart but i am getting a kick out of laughing my god damn balls off at you all here.
It's why i come here.. you kidiots amuse the shit out of me  :D

And yeah a part of me does enjoy being the smartest one on the forum with the most integrity.
No one else says what i do and and speaks out as much on regular basis.
No one even comes close..
I have more integrity and intelligence than all of you combined.
Sorry but you get no cred for hiding in the corner quietly ignoring schemes ::)

I made 12k out of thin air and learned trading the hard way.
I learned this shit by investing 0 cents.
You pathetic losers came in with "investment" money and you are still not as good at trading as me.
You are blind to trends and signals etc and rail on like brain dead greedy crypto-zombie shills..
for no other reason than to sucker in poor naive patsies into your pyramid scheme shitcoins.

Your favorite dumb ass retort is.. Ohh but but but Spoetnik i only buy/sell/trade and profit off them.. i don't SUPPORT them  :D
Where as i never bullshitted no one and exercised integrity and STILL made more money in less time with ease than most of you inept greedy profiteers.

You are not in my league clowns.
I will chew you up and spit you out all day and all night forever.
I take all comers and will put each and every fucking one of you down on your ass.. infinitely.

So.. yeah ;)
Feed me more stupid ass cliche'd little retorts (that even YOU people don't believe in)



Wanna TL:DR little ADD victims ?

YOU ARE DOIN' IT WRONG :D

Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Oh no.. we need more & more  :D
Yup you guys are brilliant.. hahahhaa

How is that even a question ?
How do you have the audacity to ask such a stupid fucking question ?
When the community thinks we have thousands and the pace just increases..
you show up here saying, yeah.. great make more ?
Really ? WOW  ::)

I already debunked this crap earlier.. go back and review the topic.
My Lan vs Internet analogy hammers it home.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: CryptoDatabase on June 12, 2017, 09:34:37 AM
The world have enough crypto currency sir, however there are still a lot of crypto currencies coming out.  some are good, some are ok, some are just meh.

Yeah ?
Open your wallet.. how many different "currencies" you see in there.
One ?

You have a special section for "fun" currencies ?

Oops my bad.. sorry i forgot this is the scammy unregulated New York Stock exchanger profits coins fan club.
Sorry i forgot these tokens were "assets" and you are "investors"

Each and every one of you here is an exhausting moron.  ::)
You are here jiggling your little dick-holsters about currencies but don't have the faintest clue what a fucking currency even is.

A currency is an object used as a medium for exchange. Seeing as the largest cryptocurrency is barely even used as a currency then a stock asset is a more appropriate term for coins. Stocks are imaginary assets traded for fiat and well what do you know, so are cryptocurrencies.

Your bullshit is becoming even more amusing though, do continue with it. You have no idea what you are talking about and that is just fine, we need people like you to keep imagining cryptos are real currencies.

Ya but Bitcoin *IS* though.
So you are spouting off the most posted Altcoin cliche in history.
It's the #1 go to defense when it comes to adoption of an Alt-"coin" and BTC itself.

You all ever wonder why i put "coin" in quotes so much ?
Because you butchered and raped it's dead corpse.
You seriously don't know what the fuck it means or you're are bullshitting. (for Bitcoin profits)

Not only has BTC historically been far more used as a currency but it also holds the most potential at being used as one too.. which is a key reason why it's the yard stick against every little shit coin scheme (for BTC profits) that comes out.

And sorry but just because you feel Bitcoin has not had *enough* adoption..
does not mean your shitcoin bullshit is anymore legit.
The comparison is if you even want to call it that is irrelevant.

What i have posted non stop forever is simply common sense.
You all try and refute it over & over so you can hop on some shitcoin bullshit and count your profits.
You fire off the same old stupid ass bullshit fucking excuses all year round.. year after year and i put them down hard every fucking damn time ...with 100% perfection.

Not one of you lippy greedy little idiots out there ever won fuck all with me here.
And you can't !

Because i am talking about the obvious and common sense people.

How many times do i have to tell you, you aren't fooling anybody ?
Your shitcoin retorts are preaching to the choir.. and even they know it's fucking bullshit.
And like every fucking word that comes out of my mouth i can prove it rock solid with tangible proof.
While you all continue to putter around spewing stupid bullshit.

I posted a topic in ALT/Main asking if people believed in the purpose/intent of Ethereum.
The votes came in and 70% of the users here do *NOT*.
The very shills flogging this stupid ICO scam coin (that is ranked no. 2 in crypto) they THEMSELVES do not believe in the fucking scammy bullshit.

AKA: Proof Investards --> [POLL] Do you believe in Ethereum ? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1652509.0)

You are all a bunch of bullshitters hopping from one scheme to another endlessly for profits.
What ever trendy bullshit rolls out you drop to your knees mouths wallets open wide.
You are full of it !
You hope from an APP's gimmick coin to a Blogging gimmick coin to an ANON gimmick coin
on and on and on.. fer teh profits exchanger ROI'z

You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.

Period .

I have schooled your dumb ass's for years here and you never learn.
Funny enough though is if i was one of you i'd be doing a better job of it.
I could hand to you on a silver platter a far higher quality shitcoin defense to use but that would not be wise now would it ?

Like what ?

Rather than coveting Bitcoin profits and not shutting up about it on every topic and using Bitcoin is horrible garbage etc to defend your scammy shitcoin bullshit.. (example = see quote above)

I would say ?
I would rattle of my favorite DAPPS by name i use ALL THE TIME ..everyday.

But guess what Investards ?
Not even one of you have said that................ even once.
Not even lied and made up one to "make it look good" ..because you are all THAT stupid.

All you all do is harp and grind and whail away endlessly 24/7 about BITCOIN PROFITS in conjunction with how Scamereum is so great and it will take over for BTC etc..
So.. you know.. pay me BTC for my ETH ahhahahhaha

You all think you are smart but i am getting a kick out of laughing my god damn balls off at you all here.
It's why i come here.. you kidiots amuse the shit out of me  :D

And yeah a part of me does enjoy being the smartest one on the forum with the most integrity.
No one else says what i do and and speaks out as much on regular basis.
No one even comes close..
I have more integrity and intelligence than all of you combined.
Sorry but you get no cred for hiding in the corner quietly ignoring schemes ::)

I made 12k out of thin air and learned trading the hard way.
I learned this shit by investing 0 cents.
You pathetic losers came in with "investment" money and you are still not as good at trading as me.
You are blind to trends and signals etc and rail on like brain dead greedy crypto-zombie shills..
for no other reason than to sucker in poor naive patsies into your pyramid scheme shitcoins.

Your favorite dumb ass retort is.. Ohh but but but Spoetnik i only buy/sell/trade and profit off them.. i don't SUPPORT them  :D
Where as i never bullshitted no one and exercised integrity and STILL made more money in less time with ease than most of you inept greedy profiteers.

You are not in my league clowns.
I will chew you up and spit you out all day and all night forever.
I take all comers and will put each and every fucking one of you down on your ass.. infinitely.

So.. yeah ;)
Feed me more stupid ass cliche'd little retorts (that even YOU people don't believe in)



Wanna TL:DR little ADD victims ?

YOU ARE DOIN' IT WRONG :D

Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Oh no.. we need more & more  :D
Yup you guys are brilliant.. hahahhaa

How is that even a question ?
How do you have the audacity to ask such a stupid fucking question ?
When the community thinks we have thousands and the pace just increases..
you show up here saying, yeah.. great make more ?
Really ? WOW  ::)

I already debunked this crap earlier.. go back and review the topic.
My Lan vs Internet analogy hammers it home.

Ah you continued, awesome. Out of curiosity which coins do I hop to and fro from since you seem to know a lot about what I do. Last time I checked I have used the same coins for years now excluding HONEY which is new.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: StinkyLover on June 12, 2017, 09:15:44 PM
Does everything on here have to descend into personal insults? (did I just ask such a stupid question?? ???)

ASSUMING that adoption WILL come, do we have enough coins for a new global economy? Enough for the whole planet? All the different peoples, with all the different aspirations, and all the variety that exists out in the real world beyond BCT.

Everybody has their own opinion. It is just a topic to discuss. People need to chill.

I believe that crypto"currencies" will be adopted someday and it's just a matter of time. That's why I can ask such a question, because I really believe in cryptocurrencies one day being used as "currencies" (not converted to FIAT as profit, but being used to buy goods and services as they are meant to be).

I'm not worried about all the scams, scammers, and profiteers. If you're a scammer/profiteer then good luck to you. When regulation comes (and it will - trust me), then the game is over. I'm not saying scammers will be prosecuted, but at some point scamming in crypto WILL become illegal and punishable by law, and only then will the scams subside (apart from the hardcore - there's always a hardcore).

I'm not sure how many people in this forum truly believe in the future of crypto/blockchain. When I read some of the comments I'm not sure people do. Profits, losses, scams and trading seems to cloud everything on here.

Don't worry, I ain't complaining too much. I'm too deep in profit to complain.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: riskthebiscuit on June 13, 2017, 02:49:03 AM
how thin do you want to spread it? I think its quite good the way it is now, but if tons more $$$ comes in then yeah sure why not add more to the pie. Until that time though lets just leave it as is because although its a profitable space, its not regulated and last we need is tons more random coins, shit ideas, and scammers. I do not think this is the majority, nor do I think people intend to begin this way but with all the ICOs and people just throwing money at them its hard to blame them. People need to be more weary of throwing money randomly, and actually invest in a product that is already working not investing in an idea. Overall, I would say its a mixed bag of stuff happening, but I do not think adding more stuff to the equation would be good. I think it would just confuse people, as many people are already left confused about this world.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 13, 2017, 04:52:34 AM
I am always insulting in a vague general way.
Some users take it personally but it is not directed at them personally.

I have said 1,000 times LITERALLY ..it's the crowd that pisses me off with their stupidity.
Then i showcase it.. then you guys ignore it.
Then i point it out again.. then you insult me.

Crying because i am insulting ?
I have taken more shit than all of you combined guys.
I am the whipping post of crypto.. i take endless amounts of shit from all comers (especially throw away 1 post noob accounts)

I have had plenty of lawsuit threats and bans across every end of crypto.
I have had people target & troll and harass and try and DOX me.
ANYTHING they can do to attack me.. non stop !

And YOU are whining about attitude ?
Please  ::)

Gimme a break.. you get to act like greedy children and walk away with a huge pile of scam cash.. i don't !

Me i get threats and a ruined Trust Rating.

The point i have harped on the most is.. The Crowd.
I do not post insults at users personally.
Logically each user is irrelevant.. myself included.
What matter is where the majority in control steer the scene.

That is the key issue here.
It's not about sides ..but control !
Who controls the scene guys ?

I don't show up to call a guy an idiot or a tranny or accuse some guy of "renting" (what ever that means LOL)

I am simply pointing at THE CROWD IN CONTROL saying they are out of control being god damn idiots !

..and they are.


PS:
That is obvious and common-sense.
So why do i have to keep pointing it out ?
Why would i get insulting to the crowd ?
Because i have to repeat common-sense to idiots 24/7 for life ?

I am not saying people are a doo-doo head and i dun likes you.
I am saying technically speaking you are acting like idiots in a proven tangible way.
That can be demonstrated ..and is often.

But all that means to all of you here is.. the next comment that gets post is ?
..yeah yeah Spoetnik *some of this is scammy.
Then you defend YOUR BAGS !

Where is the accountability from any of you ?
And how do i not get tired watching stupid people post the same bad shit coin defense retorts over & over ?
Ya know, come up with some new material guys.

TOPIC ?
These are not "stocks" on the New York Stock Exchanger guys.
They are suppose to be CURRENCIES.
And how many are these days ?

So.. who ya foolin' ?
I'm curious who do you think is eating up your shitcoin rabble ?
Who's buyin' your bullshit defense retorts ?

7 billion people and after 8 years we see 8,000 people here.
Earth gove 0 fucks.
No one is buying your stupid comments you post here 24/7.
Say what you want but i don't see 7 billion people here fumbling over each other begging for as many "coins" as they can get.. with a the more the better attitude  :D

..ya my MOM said hey where i can download fake digital currency ICO scheme tokens for profits Spoetnik ?
She says i wanna haez teh ROI'z on teh EXCHANGER SO WHERE DOO i SENDS MAH PICTURE ID'Z ?

Bottom Line:
You think it's "insulting" that i point out that i have ideology and integrity and you guys do NOT.
It's just the truth.
Don't want to be mocked then quit acting like scum bags and get some class.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: omonuyak on June 13, 2017, 06:43:06 AM
We need more coins especially one that is not anonymous! We may think anonymous coins like bitcoin, Ethereum and litecoin are good for our development, but I doubt as many evil men are try to take advantage of this to do they evil activities.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: winnerhor on June 13, 2017, 07:08:18 AM
one is enough but must be the best cryptocurrencies


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: xhienigat on June 13, 2017, 07:59:26 AM
I don't think we need enough cryptocurrencies, I think we already have a lot of them judging by what I see on some trading sites. Plus those added tokens too.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Spoetnik on June 13, 2017, 08:03:37 AM
I don't think people give the future much thought for this stuff.
Many are noobs who have just gotten here and are after profits ASAP.
And they don't care if they leave a mess for others to clean up.
I predicted that would happen when 2013 blew up in popularity.
I was right !

It took a down turn and we went into a rut market price was and a mass exodus of users leaving.
I predicted it all.
I said many would rob others as they are leaving and it happened.

This stuff is highly predictable.

And if you keep on the wrong course it's obvious what will happen.
Things will just get worse and worse in all ways imaginable.

I only ask of you all to think of the future and how it can be sustainable, healthy and secure.
People are going to do what ever they want whether i say stuff or not.
I just hope to challenge the users here and especially new users to think things through.

I think going in a positive and constructive direction is what the key to success is.
And by success i mean both adoption and your profits TOGETHER !
I say what i do because i believe it's in all our best interest..

Do you all think more is better ? Think about it from all angles.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Luke2939 on June 13, 2017, 08:05:24 AM
Honestly, I think we have more than enough CryptoCurrencies ! We need to have the devs and community trying to work with and around the promising tech and tokens rather than simply creating their own random tokens or coins.
It is high time to avoid copies and copies of bitcoin. Try to build on bitcoin and make it faster. That is the need of the hour.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: Taskford on June 15, 2017, 06:28:28 AM
I think we already have enough cryptocurrencies.  That's why when you already have one or more, you just have to support  it and please be serious on having it.

Even we have tons of cryptocurrencies today, by 2020 some of those will die, some will be diminish. We don't need a lot of cryptocurrency if some of those are useless and scam. We only need ones that are profitable and legit. It can be too confusing especially to the new ones if there's still a lot of cryptocurrency. Remove the scammed ones and retain the legit. I hope the developers just focus to bitcoin to make it more interesting.


Title: Re: Do we really have enough 'cryptocurrencies'?
Post by: kryptqnick on June 15, 2017, 09:27:20 AM
I think we already have enough cryptocurrencies.  That's why when you already have one or more, you just have to support  it and please be serious on having it.

Even we have tons of cryptocurrencies today, by 2020 some of those will die, some will be diminish. We don't need a lot of cryptocurrency if some of those are useless and scam. We only need ones that are profitable and legit. It can be too confusing especially to the new ones if there's still a lot of cryptocurrency. Remove the scammed ones and retain the legit. I hope the developers just focus to bitcoin to make it more interesting.
I suppose that depends on the purposes of cryptocurrencies. The purposes might be as goes:
earning money via trading - There are many currencies for trading as a way of earning money already;
buying goods on the Internet - Bitcoins and partly ethereum allow us to do that;
buying goods in real life - there is NO currency which can provide this to us.