Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Gambling => Topic started by: RandomSBD on June 14, 2017, 01:26:06 PM



Title: $500 Jackpot $2 per Ticket. 24 Hours. Escrowed. On Steemit.com
Post by: RandomSBD on June 14, 2017, 01:26:06 PM
Hello Bitcointalk,

I will be running a daily jackpot on Steemit.com

The pool is escrowed.

Simply send 2SBD to @bettingtipster

If you have no SBD, you can register on steemit.com, purchase Steem on the site and convert it to SBD.

Competition will last for 24 hours.

For more information check out my post here:

https://steemit.com/gambling/@bettingtipster/randosbd-win-usd500-lottery-only-2-sbd-per-ticket-escrow


Title: Re: $500 Jackpot $2 per Ticket. 24 Hours. Escrowed. On Steemit.com
Post by: i-apteka.org on June 14, 2017, 06:44:37 PM
Hello, it's a Platform for voting?


Title: Re: $500 Jackpot $2 per Ticket. 24 Hours. Escrowed. On Steemit.com
Post by: Wendigo on June 14, 2017, 06:56:52 PM
Quote
I will tally the names of users that purchased tickets within 24 hours and randomly pick out a winner.

Please define your process of randomly picking a winner. Will you be livestreaming how you will be picking the winner on Random.org for example?


Title: Re: $500 Jackpot $2 per Ticket. 24 Hours. Escrowed. On Steemit.com
Post by: TimeTeller on June 15, 2017, 06:11:23 AM
Quote
I will tally the names of users that purchased tickets within 24 hours and randomly pick out a winner.

Please define your process of randomly picking a winner. Will you be livestreaming how you will be picking the winner on Random.org for example?

I agree, please take some time to describe how the process of winners is fair and correct as well as schedule of payments.
Also what is the house split? Thanks.


Title: Re: $500 Jackpot $2 per Ticket. 24 Hours. Escrowed. On Steemit.com
Post by: jambola2 on June 15, 2017, 07:22:47 AM
Along with what Wendigo has mentioned, your "escrow" has no significant trust as far as I can see either.
You mention on the page that he is trusted, but show no evidence of the fact.

On Bitcointalk.org I see no significant trust for the user that goes by that name, and if he is trusted somewhere else, it isn't apparent.