|
Title: CCMINER 2.1 Post by: Larz952002 on July 21, 2017, 10:43:43 PM Started using this miner and loving the results of it. For some reason, I am get higher hash rates using EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b for Zcash, than when I am using the new CCminer 2.1. I know that the new release is unfinished but, I am seeing a 20-30 Sol difference in the mining using EWBF over CCminer. What are peoples thoughts on this? New CCMiner 2.1 introduced, Interface equihash algo with djeZo solver (from nheqminer 0.5c) New api parameters (and multicast announces for local networks) New tribus algo. Title: Re: CCMINER 2.1 Post by: madgino on July 21, 2017, 11:52:42 PM Where is the download to test?
Title: Re: CCMINER 2.1 Post by: halker2010 on July 22, 2017, 12:47:08 AM https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
Title: Re: CCMINER 2.1 Post by: hanskan on July 22, 2017, 03:32:56 AM Started using this miner and loving the results of it. I get higher hash rates using on EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b for Zcash. I know that the new release is unfinished and I am seeing a 20-30 Sol difference in the mining. What are peoples thoughts on this? New CCMiner 2.1 introduced, Interface equihash algo with djeZo solver (from nheqminer 0.5c) New api parameters (and multicast announces for local networks) New tribus algo. sorry, i could not understand - do you get higher hasrate on CCminer2.1 or EWBF's ? you state that the difference is 20-30 sols - is it per card (what card ?) Or per rig ? Title: Re: CCMINER 2.1 Post by: Larz952002 on July 23, 2017, 03:16:26 PM Using EWBF, I get 20 more Sols per card roughly. I have a small rig, 2x 1070 8GB, 1060 6 GB, 960 4 GB, and a 970 3 GB
I like the CCminer cause that is what I started mining with when I first started. I am biased that way. I was hoping the DEV might have a solution so I can get back to CCminer. I am using FLYPOOL for my pool |