|
Title: Misuse of DT power Post by: ubitcoin on August 25, 2017, 08:09:32 AM When there is no open scam accusation against me, why Lauda gives negative feedback to me ?
I remember the conventions followed here : for scam -> negative trust and for spamming -> banning Why Lauda should be guided to be sticking within those conventions ? Title: Re: Misuse of DT power Post by: actmyname on August 25, 2017, 11:30:47 AM Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.
Who said you needed an open scam accusation? Title: Re: Misuse of DT power Post by: ubitcoin on August 25, 2017, 12:09:35 PM Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer. Thank you for agreeing that negative trust is only for SCAM. Account selling/ account farming are related to POTENTIAL-spamming, not scamming. Account selling/ account farming are in no way related to SCAM until there will be a connection of known alts and one of alts is involving in scam, right ? Who said you needed an open scam accusation? How you will come to know unless otherwise someone is claiming ?Title: Re: Misuse of DT power Post by: actmyname on August 25, 2017, 02:44:41 PM Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer. Thank you for agreeing that negative trust is only for SCAM. Account selling/ account farming are related to POTENTIAL-spamming, not scamming. Account selling/ account farming are in no way related to SCAM until there will be a connection of known alts and one of alts is involving in scam, right ? Who said you needed an open scam accusation? How you will come to know unless otherwise someone is claiming ?Title: Re: Misuse of DT power Post by: Vod on August 25, 2017, 03:37:49 PM When there is no open scam accusation against me, why Lauda gives negative feedback to me ? There is no open scam accusation against Lauda - why did you give negative feedback to him? Title: Re: Misuse of DT power Post by: Quickseller on August 25, 2017, 03:54:09 PM When there is no open scam accusation against me, why Lauda gives negative feedback to me ? There is no open scam accusation against Lauda - why did you give negative feedback to him? ^^yes there is. It is above. Title: Re: Misuse of DT power Post by: Vod on August 25, 2017, 03:57:32 PM When there is no open scam accusation against me, why Lauda gives negative feedback to me ? There is no open scam accusation against Lauda - why did you give negative feedback to him? ^^yes there is. It is above. The community has decided that was a false accusation. The only person still pursuing it is you - a person the community has determined to be a scammer. Your disruptive/misleading actions would not be tolerated in a court of law, nor will they be tolerated here. Title: Re: Misuse of DT power Post by: ubitcoin on August 25, 2017, 05:20:27 PM When there is no open scam accusation against me, why Lauda gives negative feedback to me ? There is no open scam accusation against Lauda - why did you give negative feedback to him? PS: I want to enforce Lauda to have same stand across all types of account dealers. Please enforce him by negging based on my accusation. Thank you. Title: Re: Misuse of DT power Post by: whywefight on August 28, 2017, 12:41:09 PM When there is no open scam accusation against me, why Lauda gives negative feedback to me ? I remember the conventions followed here : for scam -> negative trust and for spamming -> banning Why Lauda should be guided to be sticking within those conventions ? You got negged because: Quote Account sales encourage different types of shady behavior (scams, spam, account farming, et al.). Accounts connected: Aamir1 (u = 730643), Jimbola3 (uid = 639399), Jimbola2 (uid = 639398), Mastsetad (uid = 663185). with a reference to: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597201.msg16101769#msg16101769 So: Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer. fits. |