Bitcoin Forum

Want to see what happens in a de facto court when you have revoked consent to a de facto jurisdiction? Below are some court videos (they are captioned with audio).

Video #1:

http://www.raymondstclair.com/videos/english-freeman-challenges-authority-in-uk-court/

The interesting thing about the video above is that they issued a default judgment at a time when they weren't even in courtroom. They *purposely* invalidated their judgment because they knew they didn't have jurisdiction. You simply take that to a notary public with affidavits from your witnesses and fill out a statement of protest to invalidate the 'judgment'.

Video #2:

http://www.raymondstclair.com/videos/english-freeman-standing-court-gloucester-part-1/

Notice the word trickery in this video. Placing orders on a man under Common Law can be used to assume a de facto jurisdiction again. (An order is an attempt to contract. Just like how ordering a hamburger from a waitress is contracting with the establishment.) This stuff is very real.

Using conditional offers for every order works wonders. :P

Another Common Law court video. This one is from Canada.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EzJsUExEDE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EzJsUExEDE)

The audio is a tad bad in the very beginning, but it gets better.

Oh, and watch for the little "bow" from the judge. Who does he really work for? ;)

I watched the first two, the Uk ones. That this things go on is really amazing.

Yes i watched that the other day on the free keene forums. :D

I love what the sovereign movement is doing setting up their own peace officers and showing how everything is a corporation - and we are the "subjects".

takibe aldım teşekkürler

Please have a look at my Common Law post. Thanks
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3780.msg42868444#msg42868444