Bitcoin Forum

is this lost?
https://btc.com/80b7a7d4cd8603bf0a7ce16ac9c67ceb34b51c9fe042233f226d80e2f46087c9
https://btc.com/f34ca22119e5bf4aca7f28c03c919b582bbdc0b67e705321ecee6cd5ace0b007

i cannot find them in mempool.. they are not in my blockchain.info wallet..

no, they're not lost, simply just stuck waiting for confirmations.
at the moment, a few nodes seem already dropped your tx from their mempool
1FrUNJCEp... & 1JNbjDeBU... are these your bitcoin addresses?
what wallet are you using with these addresses? is the balance available in your wallet again now?
if yes, you can try resend them again with sufficient tx fee for reasonable confirmations time

thanks for checking this!
Sent them from my blockchain.info address: 1FrUNJCEp
that's the problem: ballance not available in blockchain.info wallet


I cannot see them from my node:

07:55:18
getrawtransaction f34ca22119e5bf4aca7f28c03c919b582bbdc0b67e705321ecee6cd5ace0b007


07:55:19
No such mempool transaction. Use -txindex to enable blockchain transaction queries. Use gettransaction for wallet transactions. (code -5)

so you sent those 2 transactions from your blockchain wallet?
bc.info wallet is a bit tricky about unconfirmed transactions, the tx would indefinitely stuck in limbo
I suggest export private keys (using seed) from your bc.info and import it into other wallet such as electrum
then on electrum you can try to resend again with the utxo that was used in your old unconfirmed txs
you can choose whatever wallet you like, I said electrum as example because it's the popular wallet now

i can't export from blockchain.info
went here:  https://iancoleman.io/bip39/
pasted the 12 words from blockchain.info on the: BIP39 Mnemonic field
-> derivation path: bip32, derivation client blockchain.info... -> derived addresses and got lost
my blockchain.info address is not on that list

Wow 15sat/b! You cheap bastard! :D
Back when the network was overloaded you needed like 300 to go through and it would still take days. Your transaction would need about 16 hours to go through with that fee if it was sent today, which means that it still can be sent without the need for cancellation or acceleration.

I haven't used a blockchain wallet, but normal wallets allow you to resend the transaction (propagate again, reset) it can be called differently depending on a wallet.

If you can't find that address just download electrum and make a new wallet using the seeds from blockchain.info.
It's very easy: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/66601/how-can-i-migrate-from-blockchain-wallet-to-electrum
And once it's done check if you have the transaction on the list (don't look for the address just the transaction).

they have a limit.... you cannot pay less :-) everything was great with online free accelerator

I will try with electrum but this tool: https://iancoleman.io/bip39/ does not return the address from blockchain.info... It returns the main wallet address/private key but I need a secondary wallet address/pkey from blockchain.info account.

You aren’t doing this to that online web site, are you?  You at minimum have downloaded it and done it offline, right?

I don’t know if that site is legit, but it is bad practice to use an online site if you don’t want to have your coins stolen.

online.. not much left over there..
if I cannot get my own stucked transaction from that wallet.. dont think a hacker could do more

well the 2nd transaction has been confirmed now, just need to wait for the first tx
btw are these two your original bc.info addresses or imported into your bc.info account?
and have you tried the derivation path BIP44, then also try toggling External / Internal (1 = change address)
or entering any valid number (= account #) in Account input form

Wow!  you really know stuff!
one of them looks better!
Those are original blockchain.info wallets.. however they are like 3rd and 4th wallet from blockchain.info
read somewhere BIP39 seeds for blockchain.info export
will try that also, anyway.
and @bitfinex (dst address from tx) I see that transaction as uncofirmed with 177/3 confirms.