|
Title: LAUDA ATTEMPTING TO BLACKMAIL AGAIN! Post by: 802529er on January 28, 2018, 07:50:29 AM At this point the forum is openly promoting and endorsing this activity
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1761133.20 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1759991.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1759607.msg17570759#msg17570759 This user and several of his friends have continually shown disregard for the forum rules and guidelines, only to be given the power to leave negitive trust on whom they wish. And the most recent blackmail attempt. https://archive.fo/szqRf Mprep or any other admins going to moderate their god damn website? Title: Re: LAUDA ATTEMPTING TO BLACKMAIL AGAIN! Post by: TMAN on January 28, 2018, 08:10:54 AM That's the same link as before. Lauda hasn't used slack in a year move on peeps. Nothing to see
Title: Re: LAUDA ATTEMPTING TO BLACKMAIL AGAIN! Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on January 28, 2018, 08:50:49 AM That's the same link as before. Lauda hasn't used slack in a year move on peeps. Nothing to see Can you provide evidence of that? If not by your own twisted logic you are guilty of the crime then. That’s what you’ve been doing with Lauda, going around claiming other are scammers or trolls, and requiring they prove otherwise. Surprise surprise it’s diffrent for you isn’t it? The archive link you posted says "21 Jan 2017 06:31:56 UTC". Title: Re: LAUDA ATTEMPTING TO BLACKMAIL AGAIN! Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on January 28, 2018, 09:05:42 AM Your topic title says he is trying to blackmail again. You quote posts from a topic where the issue was already addressed. Not sure what you are trying to accomplish here?
Title: Re: LAUDA ATTEMPTING TO BLACKMAIL AGAIN! Post by: TMAN on January 28, 2018, 09:55:48 AM That's the same link as before. Lauda hasn't used slack in a year move on peeps. Nothing to see Can you provide evidence of that? If not by your own twisted logic you are guilty of the crime then. That’s what you’ve been doing with Lauda, going around claiming other are scammers or trolls, and requiring they prove otherwise. Surprise surprise it’s diffrent for you isn’t it? I don't need to it's a fact. You need to provide evidence to the contrary and you haven't. Just proving yourself to be another butt hurt scammer |