Bitcoin Forum

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

I had experience of participating in such companies. Their 10 companies 8 turned out to be a scam, 2 paid tokens, 1 sold on the exchange, 2 two months of silence.

i think it's matter.
If the ICO team has a really good project and sure it will produce a lot of investors, the project team should rent an expensive and good bounty managers to handle the bounty campaign.

You can find some good bounty manager here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3085997.0

Manager rank doesn't matter. Most likely this person is an acquaintance, friend, or fellow developers. Many managers with a high rank are very bad at leading companies, for this reason it does not matter. Example I can't remember unfortunately, but it was.  :)

Sorry, the question was not related to looking for a bounty manager. It's just about participation in ICOs with bounty managers with low rank.

Rankings of management are really quite important. Because when they cheat, they only lose an account with low rank. they are too speechless
But for a manager who has a high rank and is trusted. They will never want to scam and they will look for really good projects to engage in job management.

Strawbabies before was thrown with many doubts that he won't pay his participants because his rank before is newbie but he surpassed those words. It doesn't matter if the manager is newbie or jr member or member, what matter is that they have funds to pay their participants and to make it sure they hired an escrow agent. There are ICOs that don't want to hire bounty managers since they can run it by themselves but getting an escrow is the best way to trust on such ICOs. If you are more concerned of the rank, there are bounty managers that are high rank but scammers so you can't tell on whom to trust unless there's a guaranteed fund to pay for the participants.

 I don't think its a reason to call a project as scam even if the manager is a newbie. Sometimes project's are managed by its own team, so I guess newbie ranked bounty manager is not a basis to call a project as scam

Yes and No. you make me remember the time when I am new here on bitcointalk and when of the greatest decision i have made is to follow the high ranking users here and participate in any bounty campaign they also participate. the same thing applies to bounty manager ranking because to me they have been long here on the forum and they have gain alot of trust from individuals (those with green trust). however today I no longer put too much on high ranking of bounty manager before joining the campaign. the most important thing to me is how they handled their previously managed campaign. if he handled it well, I will join and if he did not  I will find other campaign.

yes that's important because their big project limits people to participate in their campaigns, the higher the rank also the more prizes and campaigns that we can follow.

all the above reviews are all true.
And I guess, choosing a higher level manager is not a way to think of their project as good. Because that level is just a "forum level".
All investors will be more confident in all aspects, the value of the individual is only the smallest part of his choice.

There are some managers who are of law rank, it actually depends, some ICOs create their own account and manage their own campaign to save money. However, I still prefer joining campaigns managed by high ranked and trusted managers, because they know how to choose a good ICO to support.

this is one proof of ICO's seriousness. if they will not do a scam. I am sure if they will hire managers and they also have personal funds to conduct campaigns. and will be very important if their campaign is managed by a manager with a good reputation

Most companies give jobs to popular managers. Therefore, very few companies with novice managers. As a rule, they are less successful

Firstly it depends on person ... not only on his rank.
For example I know manager with high rank who has promoted a scam projects.

I think manager's rank is so important in a particular bounty, I believe manager with a higher rank will engage in a good business through series of experience and manage a very reliable project.

I would personally rather have a higher ranked manager, instills more confidence in the campaign.

Sometime. I think bounty manager of a bounty campaign is truthworthy in this forum or not is really important. But there are a lot of low rank bounty manager but bounties they're managing are really good. For example, there are a lot of bounties managed by a low rank manager but they're still goo bounties to join cause these managers are development member of these ICO projects which provide these bounties.

For me yes. But what's more important is their past projects whether it succeed or not, paid on time and the satisfactory of the bounty hunters.

many successful ICOs with low bounty manager rank. although I have no evidence of it, I have followed it.
I think the success of ICO is not seen from his bounty manager rank.
but from the team and many other things

sometime ICOs dont hire bounty managers from this forum , their own member do this job .
so in that case they may have new or jr member account .
so rank does not matter in that case .

Sometimes own ICO manager spend a penny and become a Copper member. In this case he can insert pictures in post and posts look nice.
But it's not a guarantee of turning to scam of course

I think there are special points for the matter rank because if the account is still in the form of a beginner then I think the existing bounty or the project in my opinion is still less reliable because that's what requires a high account in a bounty menger to avoid scam and other bad things we do not want.

if the rank is high we may check the past, but if the junior is certainly the first possibility to handle the project, because that's what makes the participant hesitant to follow the project, because the low-ranking person is not yet experienced

it is important, everything below the member, something is wrong, then the table does not count then there are no payments. Very little bounty is found if a manager with a small rank

It only means that instead of paying high rank member a fortune, the team decided to manage bounty themselves. But indeed the project might turn out to be a scam. Need to check their team, site, ratings on icobench/drop. It would only take a couple of hours but could save months of wasted time.

Of course, rank matters. Especially now, when the rank is really very difficult to obtain, it is more accurate to say that it is impossible to get a rank on the forum right now, because already a lot of people in this forum have started their activities and now rank matters.

Yes, most of the time bounty manager is important but if the account is official and new it is also ok, i have seen campaigns completed successfully by new accounts as well, so you never really know, if anyone is going to scam it can be anyone, we need to stay focussed and do our job.

Your rank is just a basis of someone trust so I think its better to hire some good manager so you will get many investors easily but of course the project must be good and innovative. Good manager therefore the project is good also but profit is still not guaranteed.

I believe that the rank of the manager does not matter. Everything depends entirely on the project and its team. Very often, good projects do not hire popular managers and lead the bounty on their own. Such projects usually rank low. Example - Lympo

Depends on the project,if the project looks legit jr.member rank doesnt matter,thats why we need to dig up some informations in google because reearching is a must as nowadaydas most of the ICOs are scams,some managers which has legendary accounts will try yo fool you,or even try yo steal your stakes which is why we need to follow good managers.

Its not about the rank basically. As there are a lot of good ico agencies like Amazon which use forked accounts for maintaining new bounty campaigns, or from new team members.

It does not matter - if the company is not good mostly the bounty manager can nothing for it.

I think that influences. I did not see that many successful projects were for novice managers

This one! but there are really instances which the project members do make their own marketing on their own which they do create even newbie accounts to handle their own bounty campaigns.I have seen such bounty programs that been doing this and successfully handled their campaign in the end and paid up participants.There still some low rank members that can able to handle it out,we wont know if they do really have experienced in the very first place or not but i would say most of the time people here on this forum do always prefer the reputable and famous ones.

I believe you should not judge a book by its cover
And you should not underestimate any one be it a newbie or hero member bounty  manager

You should look through the bounty manager previous project
Was it’s scam  ?
Was it a successful?
Was it abandoned?
Was it continued after ico

Only after those questions are answered;

Then you can decide if the bounty manager is true or fake

I will say it's 50/50  but firstly the rank of bounty manager matter sometimes, the rank show how much there experience on bounty campaign, but sometimes it doesn't matter because some ico use one of there team member as bounty manager Who does not have  bitcointalk account before...But that doesn't predict the success of the campaign

It is one of the factors that can influence my choice. On the other hand, it is such a competitive space that young and hard-working managers that have entered cryptospace later are having real troubles to prove their qualities. And even high rank of the manager does not say anything about their approach to the people. But if I am in a serious team and I want to hire someone for our bounty, who would I choose? I think most of us would prefer managers that have proved their qualities.

The safest way is to choose one of the managers and if you were satisfied, you can follow their steps in the future. If you do not have any experience, well, you can hope for a good advice from users of the forum. You can follow successful managers as well or try your luck  ;D. It is completely up to you.

I think that the manager should be experienced. Then the campaign passes qualitatively. Steaks are counted in time, there is a normal feedback. Some projects try to carry out the campaign themselves and chaos begins in everything ... I pay attention only to managers with big experience.

I have little trust in bounty campaigns, which is from a jr. account. I think I would not participate.
A hero or legendary account awakens more trust in me. I would always choose it.

I think it is something that you need to pay attention to , not saying that every low ranked campaign manager is a scammer. But at least look at their history on the forum , where are they active etc.

It matters because they can easily say they are an "acquaintance, friend, or fellow developers". How can participants be sure that they will get paid? A third person is important in holding funds and scrutinizing the project itself and knowing the people behind it since they are the one who will deal with them (developers) directly. Unless that low rank manager already earned trust from high ranked members here.

It don't matter so much because many projects buy Hero or Legendary account just for announcement, bounty managing and sometimes to scam people.
In the other side, many new accounts managing bounties are related directly to the team and they are better than usual managers.

for now many participants are choosing managers who rank high and have a good performance to avoid some scam projects but it does not mean rank jr member all the scam or not managed I see there are some projects that are handled by jr member but achieve success achievement one example Marriot manager bounty patron
thread bounty https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3110799.0
website https://patron-ico.io/

Yes i think it's an important thing to look at . Because i think it's just like the participants, rank of bounty manager is high mean the owner of that project will have to pay more for him then lower ranks.
High rank means that bounty manager is more trusted than the lower one ( it's not true in all situation but it's correct with mostly.)

High rank generally (not always) has more expirience in this world and they are seen in a better way BUT as bounty hunter I saw very good manager in lower rank, and very bad manager on high rank, so in the end high rank has more appeal but this mean nothing.

Ranks do matter as it is one of the main attractivenes and impact to bounty hunters like ourselves but as you can see joining in ICOs that their manager is a junior member that will make your shoulder down or you felt uneasy due to rank of their manager. There won't be a loss except your time and effort if you try joining their ICO but as i say their ICO may be successful or not depends on their progress once it started.

I think this really matters of bounty manager while they are working for managing bounty campaign. If they had the higher rank then the people of bounty participant would be more and also participants are more confident about the company that runs the ICO.

Nope,sometimes it is better to join those campaigns which are being managed by lower ranks because theres less participants which means bigger rewards for you,those good managers which has high ranking profiles  sometimes will pay you less,or worst wont because they want to take all of the bounty allocation, you should be avoid such campaigns.

why do you think that high rank managers can receive higher salaries than low rank? try to see amazix team, there are some members of that team who become a manager but still have a low rank. but what is the result? almost all of their projects are successful. because the most important thing is their work, not the rank manager

So can you tell me , if there is a legendary and a senior member tell you the opposite sides about 1 thing.
Who you will listen to even you think the both ways are good ? I definitely you'll listen to the legendary one because he/she got a higher-rank and it mean he/she is more trusted than the senior one ( unless there are some special evaluations ).

I think it does, which other way can we verify the experience of such person.  I think rank, if not paid for is a good indication of experience in the crypto world.

In my own experience sometimes it is better to join campaigns from the lower rank campaign managers because there will be less participants,but im sure if the campaign is legit you will get rewarded regardless the rank of the campaign manager! the risk of getting scammed will be lessen thru researching thus you will need to find redflags so that you wont lose your time and effort from these campaigns.

I like to join bounty campaigns that are managed by the official team, they usually pay good rewards and on time also such campaigns are less hassle as there is no third party involved.

For me personaly rank is like reflecting how much trust and experience this particular person has, so Legendary BM certainly knows which bounties are better to take and lead.

Doesnt really matter if the campaigns are legit ones from the real people which arent hiding their faces,you will morelikely getting paid because these people wont steal your rewards just like what other high ranking managers are doing,getting big cut from the totl bounty allocation.You shouldnt be hesitating to join at lower ranking manager because the more your risk the bigger the rewards that you can get.

I think that it doesn't important the rank of the bounty manager. Rank does not manage bounty. Some high level bounty managers are worse administratives when compared to some newbie or member bounty managers. Indeed bounty manager is not the only one who manages the bounty. Some of them rules an experienced team

It definitely matters. Bounty manager may have low rank in case he is a part of project team. If it is a person from this forum I'd rather not join such a campaign or check his reputation beforehand.

As long as those ICOs are going to pay you,or as long as the manager doesnt have greediness to his body you will get whenever the ICO has achieved success,doesnt matter who or what is the rank of the manager which matters is,are you goin to get paid or not? thats why you need to do a lot of research for you to avoid thos scam projects,

For me the rank of OT really important, higher rank means more trust and more believe it is good to follow.

The rank wont matters if they are going to pay you,that is why you will need to have a lot of time checking people behind the project because if they arent hiding their faces its morelikely a legit campaign which you are getting paid from.You shouldnt be trusted anyone according to rank because most of the scam projects are coming from the high rank bounty manager.

Doesnt really matter,in my own experience if the campaign is legit which is probably you have researched,the campaign manager rank wont matters as long as they are going to pay your efforts,because as far as i can tell scam projects are coming from these unreliable high rank bounty managers and sometimes they are going to steal your stakes.

I analyzed the statistics of personal participation and tracking since august 2017. All the projects on my list that were conducted by the team and had a low rank turned out to be scammers or unsuccessful projects.
But don't forget that all the good bounty managers were a junior members ;)

Most of the people who arent doing their own research before joining these campaigns are going to say it matters,but in my own experience those lower rank managers which are legit are going to pay what they have promised,compare to these greedy high rank managers which are going to steal your bounty rewards,that is why we need to know which of these managers are going to give you less.

Not going to matter as long as the manager will pay you,most of the legit ICOs are using lower rank accounts because they are new to this forum but that doesnt mean that they are scammers,do find facts you should dig some information for you know it yourself.If they arent hiding their faces ,morelikely it wont be  scam that is why research is really necessary.

Yea sometimes it matters but not so much, with higher ranks comes more experience in the field and more information. the more informed the manager is the better as he will be able to resolve participants questions and concerns if any arises.

Nope i do prefer researching before joining these campaigns which is why the rank would be regardless as long as the team behind the project are legit you  will get your rewards ! Dont matter what is the rank,because as far as im concern those high rank managers are often not paying the right stakes that you get from joiining their campaigns.

Yes, when it comes to ICOs actually the rank doesn't matter much, because that ICO team members may be not really into Bitcointalk and they don't care about ranks, the other situation - one of the team members might have registered on BTT for ICO promotion and didn't have an opportunity to become Hero Member yet, for instance.

As a participant to the bounty, I pay attention to the rank of the bounty manager. If he has experience in the crypto, he probably choose the campaigns more carefully. But I see a lot of bounties with low rank manager, and the rank of the forum doesn't mean that he has no experience

Doesnt matter,but most of the people are going to join those hero managers because they can easily join them without researching,but for me reearch is necessary because some of the high ranks arent doing their job,like wha HEXAH ,OLCAYTU2005 these managers arent researching before they accept these projects,that is why they are getting involved with scam projects.

It's not that important to have a highly ranked member as a bounty moderator, maybe the project itself is using a new account to pay directly the profits into the contributers, they doesn't run behind high ranks but they only want to make everything well and pay their selves the community members just like DIW, that makes me trust more and more the project.

A good manager is a kind of quality guarantee. Of course, this is important. But sometimes I look at the managers of lower ranks, because any person can become great.

no I have not met a good ICO with a low Manager rating. if I saw such managers in the ICO project, I refused such projects

Doesnt matter,even those high rank managers are fooling the hunters by giving less rewards to these people who worked hard to promote these ICOs,you shouldnt be relying your decision with the ranks as most of the scams are coming from the high ranks.These people are using their ranks to fool the people,i have these greedy people because they have most of the bounty allocation.

I totally agree with your wise opinion. The manager's rank does not really matter to me, because high rank is not necessarily a good performance. Professionalism in project management is more important.

Higher rank manager wont guarantee your rewards that is why you shouldnt be relying to the ranks,you can do your own research if you have found that these people are legit,the project has strong support from the community you should join those legit ones regardless that rank of the manager is ,as long as you are going to get paid.

For me it matters. My most favorite needmoney, olsaytu2005, mr Cryptos, Sylon, smauni. I try to choose companies with these managers only. I understand their rules. And I do not have problems being a bounty hunter in their campaigns.

Some ICOs use their own people to manage the bounty and because they are new here, they have a low rank. The other thing is that there are many people, who are new here and want to make money as bounty manager. It doesnt mean that they are bad manager.
You also have to understand that its not the bounty manager who paid you.

I absolutely agree that we need to trust managers with a good reputation and high rank. But if the company is led by a user with a low rank, it can be a member of the project team.

Not going to be a problem as long as the newbie or jr.member accounts are promoting/managing legit projects the ranks wont be matter because you are going to get paid as long as you have done your research before joining,these newbie accounts shouldnt be underrated,because threr will be less participants as most of the people wont join,it means that you are going to have more stakes.

Doesnt matter for me because if the campaign is legit,i will still join regardless whom the manager is because i do believe legit people wont give a shit to the hunters,in my own experience only those scammers are going to hide their identity using newbie accounts which is why i prefered to do my own research for me to know if i am joining shit campaigns.

certainly!after all, the bounty Manager is generally a person of the entire project rather that face the bounty project.I think it is always necessary to know who the Manager is

they may see from the profiles or recommendations of other seniors about the person's ability to be trusted to be a manager. manager I think only to divide the stake only and the most important is the team that is in it. it's a bit of a view from me.

obviously Yes.at least for me it is incredibly important I always pay attention to it because I want to participate in the bounty of only a good project

Nope,ranks doesnt matter if the maanager are corrupted and known from stealing people's stakes that is why i am doing my own research before joining th e bounty,or atleast joining a new manager because i dont want to waste my time and effort doing bounties from these scammers,we need to consider a lot of things so that we are going to get paid.

The manager can be of low rank if the account is created by the developers of the project.
As a rule, bounty managers with a good reputation do not risk undertaking bounty campaigns of questionable projects. I try to participate only with trusted managers.

I believe no. There are many bounties that are managed by newbies or junior members. These bounties commonly are managed by themselves or the project team itself. They do not hire any outside manager. I had experience witn this and turn out to be good project,

I think the older the rank of Manager bounty runs the company, the longer he's involved, and that also means he has to be more experienced than the younger members. But I also think that sometimes they create new accounts to participate in bounty companies.

Doesnt matter as long as these manager arent going to steal the hunter's rewards,having legendary accounts wont give you guarantee that you will receive your rewards because some of these high ranks arent going to pay you regardless the outcome of the ICO is,that is why we should be following good managers which doesnt have accusations or bad records so we can expect more!

Doesnt matter for me,because i am doing my own researchng before joining these ICOs,so that i would know if the project might turn into scam or has potentials to scam investors,high rank managers sometimes arent going to pay your efforts which is why it doesnt guarantee your rewards,doesnt matter the rank as long as the account is from the legit team of the ICO.

For me ,the rank wont matter if the campaign is legit because not every new campaign can have legendary accounts here as you can see the merit system fucked up the whole ranking system,rely to the credibility of the ICO thru researching,not thru the rank of the campaign manager because some of these high ranks arent going to pay your efforts,greedy people will always be greedy.

this is a very important component of the bounty's company, the higher is the rank the better the chances that you will not be deceived and begin earn

As long as i cam going to get paid,the manager's rank wont be a problem it doesnt matter because if the manager has high rank which would be a potential scam it would be worthless,i would choose newbie manager as long as we are going to get paid,that is my logic that is why i am finding quality campaigns regardless the rank of the manager,

Of course it is very important, the higher the rank the higher their experience in this Crypto world, and it certainly affects the success of a project. it is difficult for us to know the project will be successful or not, but at least if the project manager is already famous then there is hope for us to the success of the project.

Own analysis of the project is much more important than the rating of the manager's bounty. With respect to crypto currencies, it is better to trust only to yourself, no one else.  ;)

You shouldnt rely to the ranks here,because i know some legendary accounts that arent going to pay your efforts,because they are going to get your stakes giving you pennies at the end of the campaign.You should consider most of the things before deciding to participate,whitepaper,team,product,vision,online presence,hype ,partners,so on and so forth.

For me its not going to matter as long as the project is legit,you will find it if you have done your part which is researching because you will know if the bounty is going to scam people,redflag campaigns shouldnt be trusted,theres a lot of things to consider in joining bounty campaigns,the managers shouldnt having issues from the past,good paying managers that wont steal your reawards.

In these crypto currencies world, rank was important as I could think, specially when dealing with bounties. As a participants, I usually look for a good rank manager, because I feel they are much better when handling the bounties. But what is most important are their trust rate, they shouldn't have any Red or negative rate.

As far as i am concerned,as long as iam getting paid by the manager it wont be some issues for me! it is better to have a low rank manager which wont steal your campaign rewards,compare to those high ranks that are going to steal your bounties,! a lot of high ranks here are doing shady business so it means it isnt necessary to join only those high ranks.

Personally I only go for bounty with a good bounty manager tbat has reputation in here.
I believe a project that is really serious and has a good vision should be able to hire and invest in a good bounty manager because that is also a form of promoting the project.
A lot of perceived good projects I have refused to do their bounty because I don't have confidence in their bounty managers.

Doesnt really matter as long as you get paid,for my the only thing that matters is,is the campaigns is really going to be worth to participate on? because if it isnt im not going to waste my time and effort to promote such campaigns because ut might turn into scams which will be only wasting my time and effort that is why ranks dont matter for me.

Nope as far as i am concern,bounty manager should be responsible all the time, i would choose those lower rank managers which has good bounty program compare to those high ranks which are going to give you less because they want to take most of the bounty stakes,greedy asf.That is why i aint going to base my bounties with the ranks,doing research will eliminate shit projects.

What matter is ,are you going to get paid by those high rank managers? because these days managers are dumb and irresponsible,greedy who will try to steal people's stakes,rewards are less than what they have earned thru the whole campaign which is why i am considering those lower ranks because they are more responsible.

Rank is not too important for a bounty manager. I think so. I think we just need truthworthy bounty manager. For example, you can see aTriz is a high rank manager but almost his bounties campaign and ICO projects promoted by this guy are scam. If a bounty campaign managed by just a newbie member but if this project is great I think there are a lot of people still want to apply to join.

This is one of those criteria where I say yes, it does matter.  I look at 4 different things.  Their website, how much of a reward is being given, what they seek to accomplish, and the rank of bitcointalk user that posts the bounty.

A user that has high credibility is definitely a good indication of a more trustworthy ICO.

That is one factor shouldnt be considered if we are talkign about the quality of the campaign,high rank wont guarantee your rewards,sometimes they are participating scam projects that is why we should be joining only those campaigns which wont give us shit,research and find if theres a redflag leave these campaigns so you wont waste your time and effort with these projects,

Yes, it matters but not always. Although, to be on a safer side, you need to put rank into consideration. Although, i have participated in on, that wasa Jr member, yet, it wasa successful project, but projects managed by lower ranked members rarely succeed. Another thing again is that, not all projects managed by highly ranked members, also succeed, but most times it works well for them.

Not really,if you asked me,why would the legit campaign be less better than those campaigns which are potential scam from the high rank managers? i would check the background of each camopaign so regardless the campaign manager's rank,so that i would maximize my rewards that is the mindset of most of the people if he account is in lower rank they wont,and that is a good thing because i would get most of the stakes if ever.

Nope,it doesnt matter for me,because if the campaign is indeed from legit team where you can find thru researching the manager account wont be a big thing as long as they are going to pay you,remember this ,the more you risk the more rewards that you can get.High ranking accounts managers wont guarantee your rewards as far as my experience,these managers has most of the scam bounties.

I have some plenty of successful campaigns which from the newbir to member rank here,and have lots of scam projects from the high ranking managers that is why it doesnt matter what the rank is,as long as they are going to pay your efforts very well it is okay to have lower ranks with legit project compare to the high ranking managers who is managing scam potential projects.

In my own experience,i have more successful and worthy boutny payments from the lower ranks,and have more unsuccessful ICOs from these high ranking managers,because i dont do research when these high ranks are posting new projects which is why i wasted too much time,to what i have learned bounty campaigns should be researched very well so that you wont be wasting your time and effort! and the ranks doesnt matter as long as the project is legit.

NO! ranks of these managers shouldnt be the reason why wouldnt you join the campaign,you should have done some research for you to know if it is going to be successful or going to be another scam! research very well so you will know if the campaign is going to give you good profits! do not join because of the the ranks of the manager because it doesnt guarantee your rewards!

Maybe but it's depends on thier project if the ico is have a potential also good team and legit website. Try to check this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3085997.0 this bounty managers have a good status here in forum.  Some of managers there in the link are not responsive in replying concerns but i assure that they are good.

Truly it would be matters as high ranks we expect expertise in such field. Being a bounty manager isn't really an easy job, patience and managerial skills are very important for you to communicate and manage the entire campaign. And most common thing that might caught by the eyes of investors and also their experience, mostly low rank members seems to scam only but not at all, still some of them can be trusted.

I have plenty of unpaid bounties from the high rank bounty managers,and most of my big rewards came from the lower rank bounty managers,so you shouldnt be underestimating these managers because it doesnt matter the ranks are! what matters is the quality of the project and you can find facts about these projects when you do researching.

So far I'm not really interested in participating in a bounty campaign program, but since many of those who manage campaigns have low rank account and some have red trust, I will not be participating in their campaigns. It would be better to just participate in a bounty campaign run by famous managers in the forum, I think that would be much better. So rank and reputation for managing a bounty campaign I think is very important, considering many ICO scam programs out there.

Lower ranks are indeed risky to join,but if the project has good vision and legit team that would be a good chance of getting paid as most of the people wont join as thet dont want to trust these managers because of their ranks,i have joined a lot of bounties which didnt get paid by those high rank managers,because i didnt research that is why i wasted my time and effort.Join those campaigns with legit team and im sure the manager wont be a problem.

I think that it matters to some extent. A lot of projects manage their own bounties and are only newbie or junior member. But for bounty managers from the board, it provides a little extra comfort if they are highly ranked. It means that they’ve been around and have a lot more to lose if they try anything shady.

Manager rank won’t keep me away, but it’s a piece of information to consider when looking at a project overall.

Yes, the rank is important. It may be bias, but bounty hunters are more comfortable joining a bounty that is being managed by a high ranking and experienced manager. This images the ICO as becoming a successful project. So no one can really blame anyone for not participating in bounties being managed by a low ranking manager.

Actually we have a common in thinking,we wanted to those have a high rank bounty manager who manage the campaign,but that implication of mind is woke up and changes,because i can determine that perception  is   wrong,and there are many  jr bounty  managers ,whose been much trusted and professional to there statement on  the bounty thread ,and good commnicator  to the team in times of  theres about complain  of the bounty group,and this situation i experience  it,during the time i participating in bounty campaign.definetly for us now that ranking  is  only a figures  of me,and those i need is a legit ICO that a good reputation.

If you feel capable in terms of knowledge and finance then it doesn't matter if the low ratings could be a manager. but it certainly will not be easy because of the many competitors certainly will remember the many current managers where there have been many who are experienced in a variety of ICO.

Yes rank really matters. I personally encounter bounty campaign in which the manager is a newbie at the end of the cut off there is no token being allocated to us. Whereas if the bounty managers are of high rank its really trusted and now everytime I join bounty have to make sure the manager is well known because for sure its a good project.

Ofcourse it matters, high ranked bounty managers have many experience in handling several types of bounty campaign and they already build up they're reputation in the community meanwhile jr. members dont have that experience aswell as the trust of the community thus rank really matters in becoming a manager.

Of course, rank is important to know the reputation. If there is a low rank who becomes a manager , does he join in campaign management team? If yes, I think is ok. If not , he is a team behind ICO, Let;s see the project. Some scam projects don' t hire campaign manager. They campaign with their own manager. Be careful with unknown manager.

I do not think it's important to rank bounty managers, but many people who see rank managers to benchmark whether good is not bounty, maybe the rank also indicates that the manager has a lot of experience so rank is also important.

True this is where i also depends on and on how good is this manager to handle the campaign for while it is ramping so that is why rank of bounty manager is wise enough to look for.

No I do not think the rank of bounty manager matters ,I only believe on his personal capacity that he does care the members who join his campaign that  he givrs them guide and good way to make the bounty project more successful, I will also credit the experiece of high rank bounty mansger, if they are sincere among there co members who are part of their  team and projects.

Base on my experience, a bounty manager that has a high rank is more trusted than a newbie. I would assume that a legendary rank would not easily accept a project but did his own research that the project has potential because he has been in the community for a long time. It depends as well on what kind of bounty I am participating in if it is an ICO or not. A high rank member wouldn't just carelessly start a bounty campaign if he thinks that the team behind would just defraud him because his reputation would be tarnished as well. When joining a campaign, the rank and trust of the bounty campaign manager matter to me.

Some of the best campaign (or bounty) managers here are higher ranked members, and I don't think that's a coincidence.  Do you really think a project developer is going to hire somebody who just registered on bitcointalk a month, two months, six months ago?  I guess it could happen if the member somehow earned some trust, but that's rare. 

The only members I've seen in that situation were Mexxer-2 and Lutpin a couple years ago and I can't even remember if Mexxer-2 managed anything.  The dev runs the risk of the newly hired manager running not knowing what they're doing or outright scamming.  You just don't know.

according to my personal rank of bounty manager is needed and not just rank but the level of trust dair bounty manager is also very in need and very important because with the point participants can assess how the bounty manager job is good or not and berkompten or not just that's it of bounty managers also determine the success of product marketing on offer.

i see some low-rank bounty managers which success on their project, so no problem. its often the project managing its bounty itself and of course using low-rank account but they have cooper member status on it. we can trust on it also.

    Yes that is true because our rank is effective only in the forum and in signature campaigning with regards to the payments but our personal qualification and personal capability especially english language skills is very much required  for bounty manager.

You don't need to worry about the rankings. Dev team will pay for that, Bounty manger is handling the campaign he/she will give you stake for your good governance by promoting your signature campaign and after the long composition of posting you'll get paid.

may be gan
depending on the composition of the project itself, from the composition of the team and others.

Any rank will do but of course you must know first the bounty history of that manger so that you will not end on a scammer's hands. I've seen a lot of bounty manager that has a lower rank than me and the bounty campaigns their managing are mostly successful. No one wants to waste their time for some nonsense bounties so they actually research it before attempting to join them, so before you make a plan of joining a bounty campaign you must be ready for the result of it weather its a good or bad result and I think experience will make you better in this industry.

I can't give any example of junior member has a bounty manager, but the rank doesn't really affect at least they can manage well for the better development of the ICO projects. Rank doesn't matter as long as they can really handle the good development of the projects and all the members get satisfied at the end.

Yes, I think it's important. If you want to avoid fraud as much as possible, it's best to choose a high-level bounty manager to avoid the newly registered rookie. This is the best way.

Generally, higher the rank of the bounty manager, higher trust we will put on the ICO bounty. However, it doesn't become the only one, we are better also to know the track record and experience of the bounty manager. Once more to note is that sometimes the developer uses their own bounty manager from the ICO project. So, sometimes the rank of the manager campaign is still Junior or Newbie with Copper Member, this term is the exception.

I think bounty manager's rank is do really matters because it will lose the credibility and reliability of the ICO project just because the manager is just a Junior Member rank. Although it may lead to a misjudgment because we don't even know if that manager is really a good one.

of course I always prefer to participate in high ranked and trusted managers campaigns.

I think the rank of bounty manager does not affect whether the project has the potential or not? So when choosing ICO projects to participate, you need to evaluate through factors, so the rating of the bounty manager is just a small factor. But if the ICOs are managed by reputable managers such as yahoo, atriz, deadley, aerys2, etc., then the potential rate of those ICOs will be very high.

I will still join the campaign. Firstly since the forum implement a new feature (merit point) to go beyond a newbie stage is a very diffcult thing to do, i am not sure how many percent of those able to award people with merit point really do that or just let it remain stagnant.
Secondly everyone should be given a chance low rank does not mean he is a scamer unless those that are tag with negative trust then you need to beware. All bounty managers start from no experience and only after doing it for the firstf time then they can start to gain experience in being one. If we does not give low rank members a chance on being bounty manager, after sometime the bounty managers market most probably will be manipulate by higer rank members.

yes, I think a rank managers in Bitcointalk should also be considered in choosing of nice ICO, but that is not priority assessment of ICO.

I do not know the example of a successful ICO held by a manager with Jr. rank, but the manager of ICO helbiz has a rank member, and his ICO is successful.

yes. for me it does very matters. im prefer doing bounty with higher rank manager rather than low ones. because i think the higher rank on manager, is more experienced them and more trustworthy.

I participated in some projects with such managers, more than half of the projects turned out to be a Scam

mostly higher rank managers are well experienced and trusted so bounty hunters tend to follow and join the campaign they managing. when i first joined in bounty i joined a campaign managing by a newbie and the end result the ICO is a scam.

It will be affected to the participant who will follow the bounty campaign, usually bounty campaign which is managed by newbie or Jr. member will be less participant who will join, you can see that. Unlike the already-existing rank Hero Member-Legendary participant will follow more. This indicates that the owner who owns the ICO project will be more selective in choosing managers, and will make a success factor of the ICO project.

In some times, It is really matters. But if the manager works for a good marketing team (amazix, tokensuite,...), you can be assured. Ranking sometimes represent the reputation of the person. Between JR's campaign and member's campaign, I prefer member's campaign. "Bounty" is not free token. We have to work to get it, so we should choose trustworthy projects to work and ranking influences our choices.

I think the limit will not affect the Bounty campaign they give, many ICO projects do not really care about ranking when posting a Bounty program on Bitcoin. They only focus on the content and optimization of the project.

What you see as the rank  may be a new account he wants to use to manage the bounty. Rank does not have any effect on the performance of the bounty. The manager can use any rank to manage any bounty.

I think the rank manager in bitcointalk is not the main judgment when looking at ICO.

ICO akaiito held by manager with JR rank, and success. but I prefer with more famous managers and more experience like amazix team, tokensuite team, hotachy manager, and newslike manager.

Thank for your answers, guys! If summarize your thoughts,in general rank is important, but junior/newbie bounty manager not means possible scam. As member with hi rank can promote scam project, as junior/newbie can be just part of the project team and promote successful in future project.

Some companies prefer to manage bounty’s or ANN thread by their own, and they create a new accounts for this purpose,  if ICO is not a scam such bounty complains can turn in to mess, because people have a little experience in managing them, and they start to make some weird rules, or for example count stakes for signature campaign in the end of the bounty, which will take them for several month, and also if there is low rank manager and the ICO do not have any other activities except on bitcoin talk forum, the possibility that it is a scam increases dramatically.

i think not, he is not responsible to check out all info about the ICO, he is responsible for his job only, because it is based oh his reputation of his previous works
there is some of them, u can find the list, each of them his own style of the work

I think the rank is not really matter it depends to the investors if they like the project of that ICO so it will success, but high rank and with trust points are advantage because they can easily gather members to join their campaign and it will successful ICOs.

It really doesn't matter but looking at a high ranked bounty manager specially a reputable one is lot nicer and quite appealing to work under than someone who has low rank. Some people still work under a bounty manager with low rank but I think you should not look at the rank, it is better to look at his track record and success rate.

What I think matters is everything about the project first not the manager rank but the managers track record can be a plus

I believe  the rank of the bounty manager matters. Usually the higher the rank, the more experienced the manager, the higher the responsibility for the project choice. Because if the project is a scam, it will be also the problem bounty manager,  his reputation will suffer .

It really matters because experienced and reputed bounty managers gives a big impact in the project campaign. If the project is legit and have a solid dev team means they can afford to pay an experienced bounty manager. Knowing that mostly bounty hunters following their own trusted  bounty manager especially those already experienced not receiving their pay outs.

I beleive the rank of managers in bounty campaigns really matters. The higher the rank, the knwledgeable they in terms of managing a bounty and choosing the right bounty as well. They already know the different issues and concerns in bounties and how to solve them.

The team represents the product itself good company hired high reputation  managers cause its really matters in the campaign period, good managers already established a network of followers from investors down to the hunters and especially the outcome of the product sales which determine the acceptance of the market.

not that way, a manager must have more knowledge to manage a bounty project regardless of its ranking. Essentially, a manager must have knowledge of marketing strategy and other things related to bounty.

It doesn't really matter. I took part in campaigns managed by here/legendary members that turned out to be scams. And I participated in campaigns that were managed by new accounts that were successful. Therefore you should look at the project itself byt not just at the rank of the manager.

I think it doesn't really matter but like you it bothers me to see a low rank manager in a nice bounty project, perhaps they are a friend or aquiantance or even a part of the project but seeing their rank seems untrusted, but i can refer you a trusted manager tho like deadley, sylon, jamalaezaz and needmoney, i call them trusted because my friends already earned with these bounty managers.

I somewhat like to have the assurance that the bounty managers are not scammers. But you never know, because the bounty manager might decide that he or she is done with it and just take the tokens and run.

Rank does'nt matter. You just need to find a good manager with a highly trusted ratings and how good he can handle the campaign. You just need to ind that.

There are lot's of new bounties and some of them are really great.
I don't really think that it matter as long as the project is a good one.
The only thing that matter is the project that they are doing you should look if the team and advisors are good.

not really, but over here you kinda need some reputation in some form of rank and trust that's you have, I mean if you have that, it already has an edge from another bounty manager.

it seems to me that 100% bonuses and more is like that too much, even from the point of view of project marketing. After all, you can attract investors and not only bonuses, but something else

I prefer to join a bounty campaign with a well-known bounty manager but I think any bounty manager is ok as long as you check their spreadsheet and see if it is updated or not. Many great ICO has bad bounty management like nucleus vision or gonetwork, so it is up to you to decide.

I think it matters a little because it is not the same thing seeing a junior member starting a bounty or seeing a hero/legendary member with green trust doing that. Even though that is not very important a lot of people are choosing bounties and campaigns by their managers. A scam ICO can buy a legendary account, work a little on it to make it better then post the bounty here and pretty much everyone will think everything is OK since the manager is a legendary member.

I think it is important to go for campaigns run by a higher rank member only. It ensures that he is a trusted and reliable guy.

I don’t think that’s really matter. There’s a lot of new bounty managers that are new in being managers. What is really matter is how they handle campaign and also when it is a good campaign. Rank in not a problem in being bounty managers.

As my experience joining the ICO, just a small part I see the manager with the junior rank, I think if it's a good project they will recruit a good team or professional team, and of course they will hire a qualified manager and it seen by the rank of manager.  :)

I have not yet met a manager who has all the worthy projects. Even the most famous managers often have fairly ordinary projects, which I would not support. Therefore for me the rank of the manager does not matter and I never chose projects based on the manager and his rank. First of all, the project, its team and progress is important.

For me the rank in this forum is not important rather than it is the professionalism and the work ethic if the bounty manager. A bounty manager shoud also be approachable to members that join the bounty as it is their duty to communicate with them. I would highly consider if the applicant could provide his or her portfolio doing similar work but as long as he or she is willing to learn then I would consider applicants who does not have any experience.

But still the most experienced and reputable bounty manager cannot escape people that are not true to their words or just want to scam people this is also true in the real world. As such a person should not take such experience for granted instead he or she should learn form it and take it as a stepping stone fir the next project that they will work on.

I think the rank of manager is important:

1) A higher rank means that the member is aware about the forum rules and will not make basic mistakes.

2) If someone is trying to manage his campaign on his own with a newbie or junior member account, be ready to face unprofessional behavior through out the campaign.

3) It should not be the only criteria in selecting though, if there is a low ranked member who has handled many projects in past, he can do better.

In my opinion, It is a YES! Because the rank of a bounty manager will tell you how long is he has been here in the crypto world. Having a higher rank means he knew already what and how the campaigns work and how the market goes. Meaning to say, he's more experienced. So when I look for bounty campaigns, I still go for the trusted campaign manager before I go over with the project.

i think bounty manager rank is not the size to determine a good ico. but if i see from experience. usually a good bounty manager will be a lot of participants from bounty hunter, because they believe that bounty manager brings good ico project

It matters. A bounty campaigns should be managed by an older account as these accounts are conversant with the forum and crypto space at large. If a bounty is manged by a newbie, it's suspicious. And already people know these mangers and how projects they manage always turns out.

Of course not, the success of bounty managers is not determined by rank, since most ico projects have their own bounty manager, so they do not hire a special bounty manager, and the bounty manager of their own project is usually a newbie, but that does not matter. even the allocation for bounty campaign will be greater because there is no need to hire a special bounty manager

Sometimes it dosent matter i experience last time when i joined a project and the manager is still newbie and yet the bounty distribution became sucessful. Sometimes it dosent matter because, crypto project assigned thier own bounty manger and as of now most project assigned their own. And sometimes rank matters most project chose high rank bounties because of their high dignity rank.the success of bounty managers is not determined by rank, since most ico projects have their own bounty manager, so they do not hire a special bounty manager, and the bounty manager of their own project is usually a newbie, but that does not matter.

How is the allocation of bounty campaign dependent on the rank of the manager ?

If you are suggesting saving on the fees of  a good manager by hiring a newbie, it is really a funny suggestion in my opinion. Cost cutting is good but it should one should play with the foundations of the project. In case of a bounty campaign, a lot of money  is involved and you do not want an inexperienced person to handle this. The chances of errors are higher if you hire a newbie for this. 

If this is an official bounty company and there are links from the site, it does not matter what rating the bounty manager has. For those who participate in bounty, of course, the rating on it depends on the payment.

Yeah, you have a point mate. Basically most of us here in crypto currency community will rely the rank of the bounty manger which can gain trust especially that manager have a positive trust. Also, the great rank may attract those investors which can easily reach the fundings as the ICO Project planned.

The rank  of a  bounty  manager is so important in a particular bounty  that I believe that a manager with a higher bounty  will engage in a good business through a series of experiences and management of a very reliable project.

I participated in some projects with such managers, more than half of the projects turned out to be a Scam

It doesn't matter as long as the campaign is good. We are not joining the campaign because of the manager got a high rank but instead we are joining because the campaign is good. It is not a big deal whether the manager is a jr. member or a hero just be sure he knows how to handle a campaign.

I think the most enjoyable and beautiful part of the bounty crypto money world. but now the rank event has spoiled this taste. Your rank determines your win rate. and very important. hope this shold be easy

I think the bounty Manager's reputation is more important than his rank. Unfortunately the forum is not rare ads sale profile of high rank, hence the rank can be bought. But the reputation will not buy

The rank of the bounty managers may matter but when I choose bounty campaigns I choose the ICO that has potential and the project is good. I participated an ICO once and the bounty manager is a junior member but it went well.

Rank matters when it comes to bounty campaigns, the better your rank the more points you get in the campaigns which means the more money you make from the campaign

It depends, since some projects just sign up for bitcointalk so that they can bring or wear their own project name as bounty manager but in some way we mostly choose manager with high rank or known than manager that has lower rank.

I think the rank of a bounty manager not really matters it depends on the performance of the bounty manager on how to handle a project.

It matters to me. When I decide on which bounties I join, I'm looking at who is the bounty manager among project details.

Yes from my experience in BTT rank has some impact in delivering in ICO projects because many low ranked managers lack the required experience to maned their project to final completion. Thus some of those projects fail to succeed. However few high ranked managers sometimes fail because of their reputation.

Ranking of a manager, I think it's essential that we choose to campaign for an ICO. I suggest picking the member rank, full member and above for an ICO program. and I look at the history of his manager's post
just an opinion

I have another opinion and another experience. I have participated in many different bounty campaign. Min 50% BM were without high rank and ICO were successful and paid all bounty

I agree with this. Although I do not have a lot of experience with bounty managers, professional behavior in management, fair stakes protection for all, or responsibility for listening and handling of complaints is also a sign of increased trust with the bounty project.

In the beginning, i was not considering that part of the bounties but then i figured and i think it s obvious that in order for an ICO to be successful, the Marketing campaign such as the bounties have to be managed by experienced bounty manager.
So i assume it sa very important criteria to take into account when it comes to ICOs.

In my opinion, a certain percentage of the bonus manager can make me believe. Maybe that does not affect the quality of the bounty campaign. But it really gives you a lot of confidence and hope for a good reward.

I greet, I answer your question, the rank of the manager shows his reputation on the forum and work experience, then if the manager has a high rank then he causes more confidence, this is my opinion

I generally look at Bounty manager rank, and prefer bounties with hi rank of manager,  but if it's rank is Junior, i analyze project more precisely, look at ico ratings sites, etc. Not always junior as manager means scam.

It depend on the person managing the campaign, if the team want to run the campaign themselves you have nothing to worry about, but if the person is not part of the team I will be worried because of lack of the space experience though I have seen some projects well run by people of lower rank, what really matter is that the people get paid for their work done

Agree with that.
Jr. Manager must have experience for another project. I really thought, that junior sometimes more qualified, than senior, because, Junior want to be better every time, so, Senior just doing his usual work without any result.

I think it's matters alots because the best project should be manage by experience bounty manager with positive trust, if a project is manage by Jr member rank in btctalk, I always think less of the success of the project. I believe in projects manage by good manager.

Yes, I think that it is important! The higher the rank, the more reliable the company will be for me. A lot of scams fall under the low grade. But everyone has their own opinion. This opinion I derive from the experience.

For me, this is exactly the case. But what is more important is their past projects, regardless of whether it is done or not, is paid promptly and satisfies bounty hunters.

Unfortunately, from my experience I can tell that the rank of the bounty manager is very important. I have some bad experience with low ranked managers and I will be more careful in the future. I advice you to be more careful and selective.

I don't really think that the rank of bounty manager really matter, it's because i joined CUBE ICO, which is the manager of the bounty is a newbie and from their team itself (developers) and it turns out the project became very huge and successful without any problem, no scam and still going on, so i don't really think that the rank of the manager is important

Ranking in being a bounty manager is doesn't matter and besides some bounty manager that has low rank if it has a successful project don't base on what rank the bounty manager is base on the project that they are going to advertise if is good or bad project just trust their project and still it is your choice if you are going to participate.

I don't look on the ranking of manager I look in the project if it is good then I join then if it is not then find a new one just simple as that as you can see for now many bounty manager is having a low rank but the project is very good and besides they are just handling the campaign and they are not the one own the project.

Very much, the premium manager of the senior ranking has a great understanding of reward activities to some extent, and knows how to operate and manage it. How to promote project activities correctly and energetically.

Most important how actively he watched for cheaters in campaign

Management rankings really don't matter. Even if the manager is a novice, I don't think it has any reason to call the project a hoax.

But a high level manager can give people a sense of security.

Many ICOs who self-manage their bounties will have Newbie ranked BM, simply because they only create the account to run the bounty and make the ANN.  This in no way means they are less capable of running a bounty campaign.

Additionally, there are several high-ranked members who manage bounties who have had to make apologies in recent times because of their greed/lack of scrutiny, so there are absolutely no guarantees with any of this.

If you signup to any bounty campaign, you have to be prepared to come away with nothing, much like the ICO investors themselves, but at least we only lose time, not funds.

I used to think it matters until recently. I saw some bounties managed by senior members scamming people. So there is no guarantee even if the bounty is managed by some senior or hero members. May be they don't do proper research before accepting the bounty project. I think they should be more careful while managing bounties because there are many people who trust on those members.

For me the rank of the bounty manager does not really matter. What matters the most is the reputation of the manager. Whether he is trustworthy and there are some bounty that he manage that became successful.

Regarding my experience, bounty manager has no power to control amy project whether the project is highly paying or scam.
I can say bounty manager also one of people who join the campaign so they can not make sure the capability of the project. So bounty manager is not really matter for me.

Sometimes the rank of the bounty manager is highly indicative of whether or not the campaign will actually pay. It is easy for a jr.member account to host a campaign and never pay anyone after because he/she can easily throw away the account. On the other hand, a legendary account manager will be throwing a way an expensive account if he/she decides not to pay out.

Sometimes high rank leaders can fail the project, sometimes the younger ones can success. It's unpredictible.

I believe that it does not really matter. After all, in case the campaign itself is legal, I will still join her, despite the personalities of the managers. After all, I believe that legitimate projects will not focus on open fraud.

for me the rank of bounty manager is not very important, which is important to me project concept is the most important thing for bounty hunters .. because high rank manager is not the benchmark the project will succeed

I will choose the bounty manager carefully. I trust the bounty managers with Yahoo, Huahui, needmoney, Sylon, HOTACHY, Arteezy and so on.
Although some of them are very severe, their reward is better than the other bounty.

I also think that sometimes they create a new account to participate in the gift company. And I think the older the bounty rating the Manager runs the company, the longer he gets involved, and that also means he should be more experienced than the younger members

For me personally, all these ratings and levels do not have much significance. If the manager has already been replaced in the deception of people, it is unlikely that his ratings will be corrected. Therefore, I always conduct my own research before joining the project.

Do not rely solely on any ratings or scores for a specific manager. After all, I can now recall some of the known accounts, the cooperation with which ended not in the best way. Therefore, before you start working with the project, you should definitely conduct your research.

When you talk about any of the bounty campaign, then the thing which carries the most significant importance when it comes to that of making of more amount of money, then that important factor is your rank. You can only get higher ranks if you are putting in enough of the efforts and that if you have enough knowledge regarding the things and that you are giving enough of your time as well.

It is important that the Bounty Manager have a high rank position in bitcointalk forum. It means he have  already a n experience on how the bounty works and they cannot take risk their high rank account for a single campaign. a junior rank manager cannot be trusted, many scam campaigns are handled by low ranks in the forum.

For me, it matter because in this we can see the experience of bounty manager here in the forum. Many experience, more to be legitimate of the bounty manager. The account is the matters here in forum. Higher rank have more efforts when it comes to the forum. We know that we can trust this bounty manager.

A lot of managers with high rank of cheating , and there are low
I think in General no matter what rank , but of course it is better to go to a high rank in the bounty

In my opinion, the rank of the bounty manager should be a Member or higher. The ICOs handled by Juniors are looked like a scams. Of course, it is not correct to dye those ICOs by the bad color with no any deep argument. Often the teams create a Newbie named as their project to manage a certain bounty campaign, and this account works pretty well, therefore it is better to look at the result of the bounty manager's work.

Managers with high rank inspire more confidence than newcomers, who no one knows. a manager whose high rank values ​​his reputation and is less likely that you will not receive a reward.

For me it matters a lot that an ICO employ the expertise of bounty managers with high ranks. High ranking established members here will simply not jeopardize their stature for a project that's not well think off. Although i will not generalize all of them. I was once had an experience with a well-known name bounty manager here that after the ICO, he disappeared immediately as he was already payed and just did not care whether the bounty participants will be payed or not.

Yes, it really matter the ranks file of a bounty manager in an ICO because the trust and confidence of an ICO is in the hands of a manager which could be refers as an expert in that business and done to many success ICO in a market place plus the comfortable to be work once you know already the responsibilty of a manager they have accomplished.

For the safety on our efforts and hardworks, we must select a campaign manager that has already a long experience of working for a long time in crypto business with good trust record and with a rank of legendary, because mostly who made bounty scams are on the low rank like member and junior member, because they sacrifice their account to earn money. Just find and look the good example campaign manager they are legendary, like needmoney and yahoo62778. They are both good and trusted campaign managers without any complained by their workers, because they provide of what they promised.

Based on my experienced, last campaign that I've been joined it was CELLBLOCKS and the campaign manager is CELLBLOCKS with the rank of junior and a copper member, first week and second week they paid us, but for the third week they owed all salaries contributions, and another account who provide such information that CELLBLOCKS encountered several problems, and it was thinklab71 also a copper member if I'm not mistaken, they say something but until now there's no contributions of payment for almost a month had already past away. Maybe it was already a scam. Hopefully the management cryptocurrency will take a proper actions on every issue that related to scam, so that they could not execute again and find another victims.

if the campaign is runing by a jr. account, i will not participate. i've read too many reports that these icos are mostly fake / scam.

so yes, the rank is matters.

I think so. The rank of any bitcointalk user is a representation of how active he is and how good the quality of his or her post. So higher the rank with merits means a more reliable bounty manager. Also most experienced bounty managers has higher ranks, it means they really know what they are doing. Also most scam bounties are manage by lower ranks bounty manager.

It does, based on my experience I had joined plenty of campaigns with low rank and scamming bounty hunters. Giving us small amount of reward or doesn't pay at all and the manager is cannot be reach.

Of course, there are some successful ICOs out there which were managed with a Jr. member account. It is only assumed that when a higher rank account manages a bounty, the person in picture has conducted most of the necessary research to ascertain some level of authenticity of the project before admitting to run it. Sometimes the research has to be done by the participant irrespective of the rank of the bounty manager. There are some few ones which were ran by Higher ranks accounts but got stuck in scam web.

I think managers do not matter really. Take a look at the projects themselves and not on the one who is managing the bounty. The bounty is just a single and little aspect of the whole project. Although there are several managers here who are very careful as to the bounty projects they accept, there are also a lot of successful projects that chose to handle the bounty campaigns themselves. And even those big names in bounty management might also have some projects that failed.  

i dont think rank of the manager is matter for good or not for some project, because some project make their staff as bounty manager by create an account for their official for doing bounty and not hire the famous bounty manager, so that account would be jr. member but that account has a official person on that.

It does not matter if the rank of the manager is high or low, what matters is how he handles the campaign. You should also do your part to thoroughly research for the bounty campaign you're about to take part into.

In my own opinion, high rank officers gives more confidence to the hunters as the dont want to lose their account or their trust as this is a good safety measure for the hunters.

On the other Hand, rank does not matter, as long as the icos are genuine

Personally, I believe that this does not affect the project, because those companies run by high-ranking managers will still not give you any guarantees that ISO will be successful and you will receive your coins.

it really depends. But truth is that experienced bounty manager can give you a good hint on project owners knowing about the community and what needs to be done. But that is not the guarantee either

Personally, I will see the manager campaign of the bounty at first before researching more about the bounty campaign. Yeah, I think it is important to know the manager campaign of the bounty. A bounty with the experienced bounty manager with the high good track record will be more trusted. But, sometimes, the ICO also uses their team to be the manager campaign and the rank is only Junior but Copper Member, it may be the exception.
However, the rank of the bounty manager is not the only one to consider in choosing the bounty.

for me, Rankings of management are really quite important. Because when they cheat, they only lose an account with low rank. they are too speechless,  the higher the rank also the more prizes and campaigns that we can follow.

I think that the rank of Baunti-menedzhera doesn't influence whether potential has the project or not? Therefore at the choice of ICO projects for participation it is necessary to estimate through factors therefore rating Baunti-menedzhera-eto just small factor. But if badges are operated by authoritative managers, such as arteezy; needmoney; olkayko etc., then the potential speed of these ICO will be very high.

I agree to this, whenever I see a member haring information about some new coin or project, I check his rank first. This is because some people are using new accounts just to promote their fraud projects. For the question of OP, I think rank of bounty manager matters a lot.

Think rank really matters. Your trust also matters. If it is positive then you have a better chance to take a good project

Well, I think being a manager with a low ranking status shows how good you are in terms of management and leadership but in other case, ICO's are already arranged or agreed between two parties. Once agreed, the person hired as the one to be the manager will choose his account whether a low or high ranking provided that it wont affect the terms agreed.

I agree with you. The most important  for the good bounty manager is his reputation. If he is successful  with her last campaign.  And if he paid a good amount  for the participant in this campaign. Also the rank of the bounty manager is really matters. Many participants want to join in a bounty  campaign the first thing  they do  search what is the rank of the bounty manager.  

No, not much its all depend on the team of the ICO.  I always look at the team of ICO and Whitepaper because if the ICO plan and Team is strong. Rank of bounty manager does not matter.

I suppose that rank can show the experience of the bounty manager. The more experienced he is, the better it for you.

For me, I think it matters a lot because the rank of a bounty manager shows his reputation and work experience so if the bounty manager has a high rank already then he causes more confidence. However, the rank is not the only factor to consider in choosing a good bounty. ;D

The rank certainly matters, but there are cases when the project team itself decides to lead a bounty campaign, then there may be a small rank, but usually the user name is the project name.

So you believe that the representative of the project must sit on that forum and chat here for days instead of project development? i doubt so. Yes, a professional managers should have a high-rank profile but its not "must have" for every one of them

The rank on your account when it comes to bounty campaigns matters a lot because your rank determines the amount of points you get once you complete your tasks pr expected posts quote each week and since your points determines the amount of reward you get then that means that you get more money or tokens when you have a higher rank

Yes, I think the bounty manager is very important. Choosing a trustworthy and well-rewarded bounty manager will better protect the interests of bounty hunters.

It means that instead of paying high rank member, the team will decide to manage a bounty by themselves. But if the project turn out to be a scam. They need to check their team, site, ratings on ico bench or airdrop. It will only take a couple of hours but could save months of wasted time.

I think that manager's reputation is much more important than his forum rank. Now there are really many bounty programs and good managers try to participate only in those who have some future. Of course, there are no guarantees here, but personal reputation gives at least a little idea about the future of the project and your future bounty payments.

The choice of ICO should not depend on the bounty Manager. Consider it a bot that draws numbers in the right cells.

There is no matter what's the rank of manager. Some ppl can create their account for that aim to manage bounty or smth else. And it doesn't mean that they know nothing about this sphere maybe their ols account was hacked, we don't know it.

I have different cases in practice and I can safely say that the rank of a manager does not matter if he is a professional, then he will do his work qualitatively, and if not you will immediately notice it

Manager there is no, and here is stakeholder very even. Since the ICO does not always use the services of a bounty Manager and most often to organize it by registering new accounts.

Rank of mounty manager is the last which should be took in consideration, when you find bounty campaign. All depends on developers, technology and advertising.

Nowadays, many campaign managers have succeeded in doing their job. The campaign manager does not really have the problem of why a campaign is not successful because it is because the selfish people are stealing the money of investors.

   I think the rank of the bitcointalk bounty manager also matters. Some bounty managers just accept whatever bounty needs to be managed but we all know that not all ICO campaigns are paying. There are some managers that carefully and wisely choose the campaigns they will handle so that they too will be earning tokens with high potential.

Rank is the really matters most this serve as he or she is overwhelming in what he or she posses as managers that means he or she had many projects achieved and trusted by many bounty hopes.

Sometimes it matters because there a lot of low rank manager turn out to be a scam project but some of the manager with low rank usually is one of the developer so before I join in their campaign I always study the project and I also check if there are supported by the community.

I think it's important, because the higher the rank clearly he has long wrestled with the world of cryptocurrency, meaning he has a lot of experience. and are we going to believe in someone who is new, or do we trust more with someone who has experience in doing something? surely we will choose a more experienced person even though the pay is higher. that is, the Manager's rank is very important in a Bounty.

of course it does. when I see in the project Manager with a low rank, then skip this project

I think we can not just rely in the rank of the managers in bitcoin talk thread for I had experienced that before, joining to an ICO with a manager with a rank not that high but still the ICO turned out good. Still, it is a credibility for any manager to have higher ranks.

Yes it is important that you only join a bounty manager with high rank to minimize scam bounty campaign because majority of scammer use low rank account. High Rank account usually don't scam participants because it is hard to rank up and credibility is more important than a single campaign.

I think this is not matter, for example there is amazix team and they have a lot of junior member account, this is not means project can be good or bad, you must look to project, except 1-2 bounty manager, they were really bad.

By point participants can judge how the bounty manager's job is good or not and composed or not only that prize manager also determines the success of marketing the product offered, according to my personal rank of bounty manager is needed and not just rank but the manager's trust level of the gift also very in need and very important

Many bounties are managed by managers with Bitcointalk account rankings, but that does not mean the ICO is unclear. Many also successful bounty but many participants are hesitant to participate. That's commonplace in the crypto world.

for me rank of a bounty manager  is matter when it comes to bounty even its a good bounty program and its finished successfull you are not sure if the bounty manager will pay you after the ICO.what if that manager only used this forum to take maney from that ICO we're not sure right?  thats why I suggest by joining the bounty that the manager have a high trust rating and have a high rank here in forum for us not to be scam and to waste our time participating in bounty.

If the manager comes from the developer directly (in this case from the project of the ICO), it will be no problem, because commonly they are new, sometimes they also go with the copper member.
But, when the rank of the bounty manager is Junior and it is not part of the ICO directly, you must analyze deeper about the ICO. I don't mention that it will be always a scam, but, just be careful and wise in analyzing the project.
Commonly, I will choose the bounty manager with higher rank and has the experienced track record.

Sometimes it can be even a newbie account and still legit. Check the details: their official site, twitter, facebook etc. on whether they approve the bounty and the manager. But most of the time a decent ICO would find a respected member of this community to work for them. That's what real good projects do. So you are right about your suspicions in the majority of cases.

I think so. COmmonly I will look at the bounty manager rank first before looking at the bounty campaign.
It is one of the ways to avoid some scams. But, I'm sure it is not the only one factors. I must consider the track record, campaign rules, allocation, and also token supply included the ICO project itself.

Manager rank doesn't matter. Most likely this person is an acquaintance, friend, or fellow developers. Many managers with a high rank are very bad at leading companies, for this reason it does not matter. Example I can't remember unfortunately, but it was.  Smiley

Yes the rank really matters, to me high ranks qualifies you more experience in the system. Some low ranks just opened it to scam people and ran away, moreover they have nothing to be afraid off. But with high ranks they maintain their good ranks delivers work except the project fails but not from the bounty manager.

It doesn't really matter because some low ranks are also capable of delivering some project even more than the high ranks, secondly they tried there best to make sure that they have multiple projects and delivers it as soon as possible, the people always give stakes to there participants and make they are happy and pleased with them.

Now there are many people who improvise on Bitcointalk bounty manager without even having the minimum requirements. The rank of the bounty manager is certainly not a guarantee of the success of the project, but at least you can understand if it is a person in the field for a long time and if you can trust or not

Sometimes the manager has a low rank(jr member or member), because he is a member of the team and will be better with the participants and the very bounty, since he is not a hired worker, but part of the team. But this does not always happen.

I think they are not basing to rank of bounty manager as long you can handle the campaign and being honest to who give to you of project. Some of bounty manager is from the project their hire people who apply to them even if you are newbie as long you can give a proof of your previous bounty that you handle. And if first timer I think the you can do is ask to the bounty manager and ask some tips.

There were a times that lower ranks is much great posers compared to other higher rank. That's why some managers gives chances the other users to joined in bounty campaign. But the other managers have limited funds from the owner of the projects that's the reasons why they select only limited participants. I was admire to those managers who can't discriminate the other users because they can help them to improve and to learn more their participants.

I do believe it matters for some reason, but it depends on every case, some of the reasons by many is that, high ranking means a lot of experience in scrutinizing a campaign before they get involved into it, why low ranking means no experience maybe, So a lot of hunters did mind to participate in the high ranking manager compared to the Junior Member. But this would not mean that Junior Members cannot be trusted for any campaign, some of the team members of the project created their campaign by themselves, so that means they are a the low ranking at the start of the project.

I hope my answer could clarify the situation.

bounty manager rank can make the difference but i will not put all on this info, as usual you have to study the project, that way you will know

Of course, if the manager has a high rating - this is a good indicator that he has a lot of experience and professionalism, but this does not mean that the company will be successful, will collect the right amount and pay you, not at all, perhaps all the opposite, for this The success of the project does not depend entirely on the title of manager.

yes it is important a rank to be a bounty manager tinnginya a rank it shows their experience in the world crypto to become a good manager and professional :)

If the Manager is local, perhaps, if a newcomer, it is likely that the ICO itself has engaged in a bounty campaign. Well.. managers have a lot of money, so they do not need to pump your account.

some time ago I had time to think like that, but now I never see the ico manager rank. If I think the ico sale is very good, I will follow the bounty ico. I take the example lympo, ico lympo very successful

As a bounty manager, your rank matters a lot because your rank determines the amount of points you get weekly and the amount of points you get determines the amount of tokens you get at the end of the ICO. Accounts with better ranks always get better rewards as long as they meet the posts quota and accounts with the highest ranks get the highest number of tokens.

Nice question! I think it's not really matters because even you are low rank bounty manager you can manage bounty campaign as long as you have a knowledge, ability and skills that needs to be a bounty manager. Rank in this forum is not the true basis of being manager sometimes I saw jr.member bounty manager in some ICo so we expect he or she is not good because he or she haven't more experiences about managing a bounty campaign. However you didn't looked behind his or her great potential to be qualified as a manager.

I don't say that being lower rank manager is better than higher rank manager in this forum or being more experienced and intelegent person are the requirements to become bounty manager.
but rather you should think where do they start to become a bounty manager? Yes! They really start as low member going to higher member..

Actually Yes, It does matter since most people follow high ranking managers due to their credibility since they are more experienced in this forum but recently i've seen successful and profitable campaigns managed by just full members and some by members. yes the manager is a factor but you also need to consider the potential of the campaign to succeed.

I think it really matters If the ICO team has a really good project and sure it will produce a lot of investors, the project team should rent an expensive and good bounty managers to handle the bounty campaign.

If a manager with legendary rank can seem to us has experience. I generally don’t mind bounty managers rank but I prefer to work with same manager for trust. There are really good ones. But there are also irresponsible managers too.

The rank of the bounty manager is only relatively important for the success of an ICO. It 's true that lately new bounty manager are emerging from scratch, but this does not mean that they are all incompetent and that those with a higher rank are absolutely the best. Personally I participated in the past to bounty campaigns of junior manager, I do not remember the name, but they have had a good success because the project and the team were very good

It's really important because it's not easy to get high rank on bitcointalk, although that in the past we didn't have merit system, but it takes about 2.1 to 2.8 years to reach Legendary. And in the past amount of members wasn't crowed like now so Mod can easily control forum and delete trash posts, spam account. So the higher rank bountymanager had, the higher reputation and responsibility they are.
 

I see there are bounty by jr. member managed but attracted a lot of participants. However, I still choose bounty managers with high rank and experience. They manage well and regularly update spreadsheets. I love it

I think that manager's reputation is much more important than his forum rank. Now there are really many bounty programs and good managers try to participate only in those who have some future. Of course, there are no guarantees here, but personal reputation gives at least a little idea about the future of the project and your future bounty payments.

Ranking is not justified to a bounty manager's because its all about to a legit project even a high rank member of BTT will run a scam ico project and because of that if I participated in bounty I always investigate if it is legit or not.

Well in some part it matters because it's like the representative of the bounties project or the project manager however there are some cases where the projects making a new account and let it handle the bounty thread, most of the people of the forum are joining bounties and one of their traits in joining the bounties is based on the manager of the bounty.

But for me i'm not looking in the bounty manager i'm looking for the project itself if it has a future in the crypto world because most of the tokens are worthless in the future. So it's in the person itself whether he/she's looking for a reputable manager or not.

But a reputable manager is an advantage because:
• He/she review first the bounty/project itself (Most of the managers didn't handle a scam project)
• He/she has the experience of handling participants
• Time management on checking participants
• Well presentation and easy to understand rules
• Good on implementing rules

So for me rank doesn't matter as long as the service he/she can give is good, such as:
• Checking on time
• Updated spreadsheet
• Strict to rules
• Approachable (can contact anytime, fast response)

Based on what you say what is the minimum rank you think is needed to be a bounty manager? Higher rank people does not really mean they are experience in being a bounty manager and lower rank also does not mean they are not competent in being one. I will not say all account but some accounts might be bought or being hack so they land in the level they are in.

Bounty manager can always say "they lied to me, and didn't pay, i'm a victim as you" - so what can you take from him? No matter who is bounty manager, you should find info about ICO by yourself, and invest on your own risc.

I am more likely to see the previous job done by the manager, succeed or not. Because each high rank does not necessarily succeed in taking care of every project it handles.

Yes for me the rank of Manager is of great importance. if I see a Manager with a low rank, I don't work with him.

I know such examples but they are quite rare. In general, there is nothing to worry about if the team itself conducts its own bounty campaign.

To be honest I don't think it matters because even a 'lower level worker' for a project can screw shit up in some way or other. Chains are only as strong as their weakest links.

I think it is a measure to determine a manager based on rank, as much as possible select a manager whose rank is already high.
Because it will be more convincing if the manager has high ranking and more experienced.
I'm afraid if the junior members only manager rank is an ICO scam, but does not deny the possibility if it is really not a scam.
Check carefully before choosing ICO.

Some icos liked to handle their ICO bounty themselves, bounty manager rank doesnt matter aslong as the team & project is legit thats all you need

How can he or she participate if they rank is only a newbie? I think there is a qualification in every ICO's and you must be at least a jr member to join a campaign. i'm just asking my friend correct me if I'm wrong. :)

Well, it somehow matters such that if the rank of the bounty manager is high, it will appear to be more trustworthy and might give an impression to its campaign that it has a high chance to succeed. But it doesn't measure the capabilities of a good manager because there are bounty managers despite of having a low rank,  but are better than those who has high ranks in this forum.

I think  - yes. I now participate in 8 bounties and only two managers show the results in the tables and answer questions. What to think about the rest - I do not know.

But what about their ranks? Do those two who show the results have higher ranks?

I think many posters in this thread misunderstood the OP's question. Now I'm not talking about you, baeva2, but about others debating the acceptance to different bounty projects and allocation of payments in the projects judging from their ranks. We are talking about the rank of bounty manager here, not about ranks of participants.

A manager with a high rank in most cases has already conducted several companies and you can analyze how successfully he conducted these companies.

I think that this is a factor. Every serious project CEO should be able to give the advertising job to a competent, high ranked manger in this forum to help run their bounty campaigns. This is never a guarantee but it gives the bounty hunters and also the investors some sense of encouragement to invest into the project.

It's not only matter, actually i depend only on Manager rank. I join bounty on behalf of Manager rank. Well, i don't think that low rank manager have successful ICO, so its just waste of time if you join bounty of low rank manager. Only 1% low rank manager have good project because that project's are managed by its own team! But, mostly low rank managers run scam project only for money or some failed to collect amount in ICO.

No, rank does not matter. Important experience of the manager and feedback from participants about him.You can find ratings here on the forum.

rank is based on experience so participants this is what they are look for and see this bounty as good when they see the rank of the manager also what i have been look for is the background and on how does the bounty manage on not just depends on the rank.

It does but I would back track every project this certain manager handles, I participated to some campaign with high ranking managers but those campaign end up as non-paying or scam, Most likely I don't trust newbie campaign manager but would reconsider if it's vouch by certain group or individual.

Being a bounty manager usually those having higher rank but not necessarily on this community but it should be in your personal status in life or personal qualification because you will be handling group of people , so it is very important that you can lead and communicate especially in english language.

Ya absolutely it matters as every good ICO project will hire a good well experienced bounty manager to manage their campaigns....they wont risk their reputation by giving managing rights to some newbie or junior members...hence it really matters

It does not matter if the rank of the manager is high or low, what matters is how he handles the campaign. You should also do your part to thoroughly research for the bounty campaign you're about to take part into.

i think it matters. bounty manager with high rank more trusted i think. i don't like join bounty in newbie bm project.

I think it matters because of trust.

We all know someone can just pretend to buy an account and be its owner for just a week.

The thing is, I had an experience with a legendary members who have been scammed twice? Lol. and another issue with a bounty manager supporting the fake marketing of the bounty ICO he handles. Lol What a retard.

Both had red trust because of that.

As for my opinion, being a bounty manager doesn't really matter about your rank because I've come across a project that was managed by a junior rank member and the project actual fulfilled all their promises and were able to meet up to expected standard. I think all it requires to be a bounty manager is to be very hardworking and you must know a lot about managing projects of it's kind with a good reputation.

Now there are many people who improvise on Bitcointalk bounty manager without even having the minimum requirements. The rank of the bounty manager is certainly not a guarantee of the success of the project, but at least you can understand if it is a person in the field for a long time and if you can trust or not

It is doesn't matter for me if I made a research about the project because some good projects manage their bounty campaigns by themselves. But when you dont have time for researches - the rank of manager could say something about the project.

I often take part in bounty campaigns, based on the good name of the bounty manager. This has always worked, so I will continue to do the same.

It came to my head that  this really matters of bounty manager while they are working for managing bounty campaign. If they had the higher rank then the people of bounty participant would be more and also participants are more confident about the company that runs the ICO.

Many bounties are managed by managers with Bitcointalk account rankings, but that does not mean the ICO is unclear. Many also successful bounty but many participants are hesitant to participate. That's commonplace in the crypto world.

Many bounties are managed by managers with Bitcointalk account rankings, but that does not mean the ICO is unclear. Many also successful bounty but many participants are hesitant to participate. That's commonplace in the crypto world. :) :) :)

No rank does not matter, because if it is really a good manager, then he is popular with people, and after all, they all follow, once saw that the manager had the status of a legend, then in the signature he put himself the very first!

bounty managers with higher rank have a very good skill in managing a bounty, therefore many bounty in handle by high rank manager has great potential to achieve success and for manager with low rank does't mean will not achieve a success and I see some bounty in handle by low rank manager can achieve success

I cannot give you any certain one, but you can be sure, that there are lots of them.
For me this does not metter.

yes they do. whenever I decide to join into bounty campaigns I always look at the profile of the manager to see what projects has he helped before and to be at least hero member as this puts me in a comfortbale place to get involved in that bounty program.

i think it's matter.
If the ICO team has a really good project and sure it will produce a lot of investors, the project team should rent an expensive and good bounty managers to handle the bounty campaign. :)

I had experience of participating in such companies. Their 10 companies 8 turned out to be a scam, 2 paid tokens, 1 sold on the exchange, 2 two months of silence. :D

I think rank does not significantly influence, I prefer to experience and trust manager, some of the previous project he ever hold can also be for reference

I think there are special points for the matter rank because if the account is still in the form of a beginner then I think the existing bounty or the project in my opinion is still less reliable because that's what requires a high account in a bounty menger to avoid scam and other bad things we do not want.

We can't deny the fact that higher ranks is the one we truly trusted because of its strong foundation in this business but the question is,if that account used really by the true owner or just being piloted inorder to qualify to manage the project because most companies today wanted to have experienced in becoming a bounty manager.There are really projects that just wants to scam people and manager has nothing to do with that since they are also just being hired just to manage the ongoing  project.For me it doesn't matter if the bounty manager has low rank because if that certain projects were legit then they will pay,the company will pay but if its scam then managers has nothing to do with that since we are all anonymous here and seems very hard to trace the true identity of a scammer.

Which I first see is his trust. Because it is the level of success of a manager. The more trusted it is the better the manager.
I'll get out of that bounty if the manager suddenly gets a negative trust because it's so risky, I'll lose the result of my hard work.

For me rank is not really matter in determining an ICO if it good or not. Because these manager is just hired to run the bounty program, they not even part of the team. Whether it scam ot legit these members had nothing to deal in anycase. So dont bpame any manager if the project is  scam and dont be proud if the project is good.  But bountyanagers has a good impact on the community supporters such as the bounty hunter who followed them

For me, the experience and confidence in the bounty manager are also key factors. The account rank is a secondary factor, which almost does not affect anything. The experience of the manager is crucial.

It really does. It's all about impression. High ranking managers entails experience and credibility. Plus a good trust rating with a solid portfolio, you almost can't go wrong. Not being bias or anything, I wouldn't take the risk of joining a bounty with a low ranked manager. It's just not safe and practical.

Often my attention is directed how strong is looking bounty project and I don't look at bounty manager's account, even if it's a junior.

Usually, that is my preference in selecting ICO for my signature bounty campaign since bounty managers plays an important role for such job. I would feel confident that if the bounty manager is good, definitely we are sure to be given token reward at the end of the campaign period. I happen to notice
that most of the bounty managers are having a Hero member and legendary ranks.

Yes for me It's really mattered right now its because it talks about an experiense and on how they can hanfled their campaign for every participant joined.

I do not think the manager's rank does affect a success. many senior manager rankings but ico fail as well as low but successful rankings, it is not fundamental and can not be used as the main benchmark of project success.

Indeed, bounty managers with a high rank usually have a good reputation and cherish it. I always try to participate in campaigns where the bounty campaign is led by an experienced bounty manager with a high rank.

For my own opinion, it doesn't matters for me if the rank of the bounty manager is even lower than mine, what matters the most is her trusting numbers. If the bounty manager has a negative trust then I will discourage to join his/her bounty campaigns. Rank is not important on a manager, the most important thing is his/her managing skill to run the whole bounty campaigns in it's self.

the rank of bounty manager doesnt matter but it depend about who is that bounty manager? is he is officialy bounty manager and he manage many bounty then he should be hight ranked and no less then full member but if he is member of the team of that ICO then its ok if his rank is copper member or jr member because they generaly open a new account and name it by the name of that ICO

I think there are special points for the matter rank because if the account is still in the form of a beginner then I think the existing bounty or the project in my opinion is still less reliable because that's what requires a high account in a bounty menger to avoid scam and other bad things we do not want.

Yes and No.

Yes, because a bounty manager who has climbed up the ranks, has managed a number of good bounties knows what they are doing. Trust builds. More bounty hunters will join and therefore this is good for the ICO.

No. I have, unfortunately, joined some bounties and those managing it have been highly ranked members of this forum. For whatever their reasons, they have not managed them well at all, some have even just bailed. Living off their former glory and no longer care? I'm not sure.

Best to check them out as much as possible, ask on here about a manager and you should be in good sted.

For me the rank of the Bounty Manager matters, for me the rank says if the Bounty Manager has a lot of experience on ICO's or cryptocurrency in general. And I think that the rank of the Bounty Manager plays an important role in the campaign specially at first sight, because people think that the higher the rank the better and more responsible the Bounty Manager is in handling the Bounty Campaign. But it doesn't necessarily mean that the higher the rank the better the campaign will be, of course it still depends on the efforts of the participants of the campaign and the project itself.

I think it does not matter if the manager's rank is high or low, and the most important thing is how he handles the campaign. And more definitely you should do a thorough research for the bounty campaign that you will take.

No, the ranks not always impact anything. I can give you an example. Atriz  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=135920)as a legendary member of this forum always got a scammed ICO project. Now he got red trust by DT members. I got a good project called Arbidex which managed by Full member rank. Arbidex  (http://bit.ly/2Fhpfv2)reach hard cap and the project still live until now.

no, I do not think bounty managers affect the outcome of the project. the most important is the team and the community. good marketing and bring in a lot of investors.

You can get an answer to this question if you look at the statistics of new tokens that have started trading on the exchanges.

For me, it matters. It is still different if you have a bounty manager that has a high rank. Legendary or hero members are experts when it comes to bounty campaigns and from reading the whitepaper. they can already tell which project is a scam or not. Ever since I started joining bounty campaigns here, I only joined bounty campaigns that have a high-rank manager in order to be safe.

The thing is, when a low ranking member is managing an ICO then it means that it a free service offered by the manager so that he/she will have an experience in managing ICO for his/her future endeavors on managing ICO. He will use it as preferences when an ICO asks for his service. It also means that an ICO that has a high potential of scam will get the free offer so that they will save a lot of money.

Sometimes no, because some bounty programs may be managed by third party but the account is a newly created one exclusive for the use of the project so I think it does not depend fully on the rank of the manager.

I think no, rank is not matter to become a bounty manager as long as he /she can handle the bounty campaign but most of us want a manager that have higher ranked because it is our based that manaher have a lot experience and also bounty manager have important role so a lot of people trust in some manager that have a higher rank. But for me it doesn't matter whether its low or higher rank as long as tha manager not abandoned the campaign.

I personally don't take manager's rank into account. All I'm looking for in a bounty is a solid project that I believe in that is actively engaging in their project. It's important to check up on your bounty to see how they are doing with community engagement.

Of course not, the main thing is his previous projects. You can go to his profile and easily check it out.

ranking managers is very important because I know the rank of manager also plays a role in the gift.

Ranking managers are very important because with a trustworthy high ranking manager and a definite experienced manager.

yes bounty manager rank really matters because i had a bad experience i filled a bounties without noticed manager's rank and got nothing from that bounties. after that whenever i am going to fill any bounty firstly check the rank then further start filling process and after choosing this method from last three bounties i got positive result

Success does not always depend on rank. Rank is another indication that the company is serious. However, this is not the main thing. I filter companies on a variety of parameters and rank is far from in the first place.

Of course yeah,if you talk about ICO,don`t matter what rank, projects can create new acc(pundi x was the example as i remember)
But if you mean bounty campaign, just check carefully low ranks(their Telegram group if they have, spreadsheets etc)

The rank of the manager, in my opinion, is of great importance. I believe that managers with high rank will take care of their reputation, so they will more carefully choose projects with which they will work. To managers with low rank I would be cautious.

I think It matters  because I only Join bounty campaigns that are handled by Full members and up  but my priority are the famous and the trusted campaign managers here in the forum where majority of them are Hero Members and Legendary buT If the I saw a lower rank bounty manager but under Amazix group I still join because they are Amazix.

I do not think rank is too important. Credibility depends on the number of projects they have managed successfully. I always look for bounty campaigns through reputable managers on the Bitcoin Forum.
In addition, there are good ICO projects that do not hire managers in this forum. They will create an account to manage the campaign. So we should not judge a manager's reputation and responsibility through his rank.

High rank generally (not always) has more expirience in this world and they are seen in a better way BUT as bounty hunter I saw very good manager in lower rank, and very bad manager on high rank, so in the end high rank has more appeal but this mean nothing.

It depends on if its an external bounty manager or an internal for the project. So if its one team member from the project who is making the bounty campaign, i would say it doesn not matter. Because he or she has just to manage this one boutny campaign. ANd i think it should not be a to hard work to keep the boutny campaign updatet. If theres a external bounty manager, who is employed just for the boutny campaign, i would say it matters. Because i see it often in bounty campaigns i participate that the bounty manager is totally overwhelmed.

rank is also important for being a bounty manager, but there are some jr member manager which is sometimes part of the ico team, its also good to participate with that, because every ico has no guarantee that will pay you even with a high rank manager.

For me yes.. It matters.. Their rank represent their experience in ico, bounty, trading anything that includes cryptocurrency.. Well, when im looking for a bounty project to campaign, i always look who is the manager and their rank.. I think no one on the top rank want to be their reputation ot get tainted..

Haha i know your anxiety, but you don't try you can not receive anything, and everyday bounty is hard to make money. So you can stay here can still worry and i will find more bounty to work.

I think, bounty manager's rank doesn't matter. Choosing bounty by it won't 100% protect you from scam projects.Manager is responsible for bounty, not the project itself

I do not think that's a problem. There are a lot of people who have a low rank but manage a good bounty program.
You shouldn't pay too much attention to the ranks. You look at the bounty manager's previous work.

Well higher levels are needed to fight off the multi accounts spammers/abusers,just look at twitter campaign how many bots there are and they are wreking those threads.Also higher lvl gives a bit more trust because that level is earned in some way

no it doesnt matter,  just only last reputation and experiance of manager work  means and important.

About rank, for example productowner doesnt want pay money to  manager and registrate  own account on the forum,  moderate his own thread with cooper member rank, why not))))

I think bounty manager rank is an important matter. Because they have been here for a long time in the forum so they will work on good projects. The person who is in high rank will never want to scam and will work with him faithfully.

I don't think so. For me it is okay if the manager is Jr. member or any rank as long as they know how to handle a campaign, they update participants, they communicate with they. I think they reason they why most of the managers are higher rank because of reputation and also the experience.

You know, yes, its matter. I took part more then 100 bounties and mostly scam was where manager have been junior, newbie or member. For now i know how different managers work, i can be sure in it, so take part in theirs companies with no doubts

The manager's rank is an important factor when choosing a company's bounty, but this can not provide 100% confidence in the success of the project.

Yeah. It does matter. The level or the rank of the campaign manager in the forum shows how skillful the manager is. The rank of the campaign manager shows him/her experience in handling or managing the campaign. But not all the times. Sometimes the rank is just a rank. It still depends on how the person manage the campaign regardless of the rank. All in all the rank matters in the campaign even in this forum.

If honestly I would be scared off, but in fact the bounty manager does not dispose of tokens and will not be able to deceive anyone, he just monitors the performance of assignments from bounty hunters.

Yes, its also matters for me. And what matters most is he must be trusted campaign manager. If he is much trusted then he is so experienced, very organized and easy to approach campaign manager. That all the campaign that he handle is good.

Personally, I believe that this does not affect the project, because those companies run by high-ranking managers will still not give you any guarantees that ISO will be successful and you will receive your coins.

There are many scams and you need to be very careful! Take this into account because you may waste your time which is very valuable. I think that it is necessary to find the trustworthy campaigns with the high rank

Rank does not important. More important who is behind this account. I mean that it is important who is bounty manager, but not the forum account rank. Second thing which most impotant - success of ICO.

For a project, the rank of a bounty manager is not that important. Much more important is how he fulfills his functional duties. On the work of the manager, I can judge from his past campaigns, in which I participated, or, according to the reviews of his comrades from the crypto community.

The rank of the bounty manager doesn't really have any direct correlation to the strength of the bounty, or the efficiency of its management.

A lot of ICOs launch their own bounty on a copper member account with almost no activity, that doesn't mean that it will fail or that it will be badly managed.

That being said, most of the best bounty managers will have been around for a long time, and hence will have experience under their belts, but there are likely a few noobs (relatively speaking) that are exceptions to the rule.

Well, let's take a look at some bounty manager that manages bounty campaigns ,management of bounty campaign does not depends on rank.  Not only Jr members, there are some bounty campaigns out there been managed by  even newbies. And they will successful,it just depends on how successful the ico is.

the more experienced the manager, the more likely a successful company. Beginners often take up failed projects. Although experienced are also not insured against failures

I agree with you, but having experienced bounty manager with a great reputation helping the project and is definitely help the bounty program and relax the bounty hunters.

Rank doesn't matter in handling campaigns. It is not a big deal if the manager is a Jr. Member or a Legendary member.
What matter is they know how to handle campaign. They know how it works and also they know how to communicate with other participants.

Manager's rank on btt doesn't matter, even some high ranked members that I won't want to mention failed in managing their campaigns. Just search for a good ico and participate in their bounty regardless of who manages it.

Well, i disagree with you because the rank of bounties campaign manager matter in some ways because they have much experience, their reputation is at stake and they won't want to gamble with the forum trust they already earn. While, newbie or low ranking can do as they please cause it won't take them much time to get alt account.

For the bounty hunters the rank of the bounty manager is important. The most known the manager is the better chance we have to be good project. Usually the good Bounty managers try to avoid as much as possible scam projects.

I think as long as the performance of the bounty manager is good then the rank will not affect. the most important thing is the responsibility to handle a project. but if you still doubt you can choose a bounty manager who is already experienced and professional, so you will not feel afraid.

To me it really matters. A good projects should be able to get a well trained, perfect and expert managers. Although, those managed by low rank forum managers may also turn out to be good, viable and profitable.

Trust can be differed from rank,now you can even buy an legendary ranked account which doesn't means they are trusted person and can participate in their bounties.But the reputed manager are available who take most successful projects and even their ranks at full member.

I have observed that and some even said from member rank above that will be participate on signature post, i don't really understand by neglecting jr member out, while we are fresh into the system and ready to work, to give out the best to the successful of the ICO project

For me it dont matter as long as He/she always do here task as Bounty Manager it doesnt matter what your rank is jr, or member the more important is you do your task as a Bounty Manager as always. like Spreadsheets works etc. But *Unlike some Bounty Managers too many Bounty Campaign they use to Handle the Quality of Work as Bounty Manager is degrading, like Bounty Sheet not updated Correctly, Bounty stakes is not given to the Participants correctly I personally Experienced this Kind of lapses. and I lose my stakes and token on that particular campaign. but theres a lot of Good and Hardworking Bounty managers too. like:

Newsilike*
ErickVand*
NeedMoney*
Deadlyd*
Blockeye*
Tactic/Hotachy*
and more* Kudos to you guys..

For me a rank of a bounty manager is quite not matter to choose bounty campaign I think in a trusted bounty manager is really matter for this. Because we can't base on a present rank of some bounty manager of what or where she/he manage a bounty campaign, for me experiences and knowledge is really needed to choose a good bounty campaign. For example the a good well experienced bounty manager can also make new bitcoitalk account to find an an additional bounty campaign to be manage so you think this newly bounty manager is not so good because he has a lower rank but behind that rank a professional and great bounty manager hiding.

There are so many important factors which matter a lot when it comes to that of the making of money while participating in any of the bounty campaign is concerned. Rank does matter as the amount of earning which you will be having because of the bounty campaign greatly depends on your rank and that you can only get higher ranks by putting in the best of your efforts.

This is for sure. Most experienced managers will check the authenticity and development potential of the project by themselves.