|
Title: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: BitcoinTraderFX on November 21, 2013, 05:46:27 PM Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: Qoheleth on November 21, 2013, 06:48:34 PM Hehehe. "Before New York closes." That's so cute!
Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: mgio on November 21, 2013, 06:52:40 PM Why use candlestick charts if Bitcoin exchanges never close???
Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: lnternet on November 21, 2013, 07:01:27 PM Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: piramida on November 21, 2013, 08:05:34 PM I think you draw the FUCK oscillator wrong.
Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: rampantparanoia on November 21, 2013, 08:53:51 PM Clear Bull Trap @ 1337 EUR I think its a 1337 bear trap. Cause only the bulls are 1337, yo Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: BitchicksHusband on November 21, 2013, 08:56:21 PM Look everyone. Some beginner is running a generic stock program on bitcoin. The program isn't smart enough to figure out "New York" has absolutely zero meaning to the Chinese that drive everything around here.
Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: adamstgBit on November 21, 2013, 08:59:51 PM Look everyone. Some beginner is running a generic stock program on bitcoin. The program isn't smart enough to figure out "New York" has absolutely zero meaning to the Chinese that drive everything around here. you trust me now when you feel like selling in 3 weeks BUY! Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: oda.krell on November 21, 2013, 09:26:52 PM Why use candlestick charts if Bitcoin exchanges never close??? Because both the human mind and formal algorithms need a way to divide continuous time into discrete chunks? Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: lnternet on November 21, 2013, 10:04:50 PM Your local quantum physicist may oppose calling time discrete.
Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: antimattercrusader on November 21, 2013, 10:20:28 PM Your local quantum physicist may oppose calling time discrete. lol, the chunks are discrete in order to aid our feeble brains in comprehending the perception of time, not the time itself. The chunks only exists in your linear human brain. No one was stating that the laws of quantum and/or temporal physics are in or can be represented by discrete units of chunks! RELATIVE TO HUMAN LINEAR UNDERSTANDING/PERCEPTION OF SPACE-TIME, IT IS POSSIBLE TO DIVIDE OR PERCEPTION OF TIME INTO DISCRETE CHUNKS! JESUS TAP DANCING CHRIST THIS IS AN IMPORTANT TOPIC AND WE SHOULD HAVE A 40 PAGE ARGUMENT ABOUT IT! Besides, where will I find this so-called local quantum physicist? Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: BitcoinAshley on November 22, 2013, 12:53:59 AM Your local quantum physicist may oppose calling time discrete. lol, the chunks are discrete in order to aid our feeble brains in comprehending the perception of time, not the time itself. The chunks only exists in your linear human brain. No one was stating that the laws of quantum and/or temporal physics are in or can be represented by discrete units of chunks! RELATIVE TO HUMAN LINEAR UNDERSTANDING/PERCEPTION OF SPACE-TIME, IT IS POSSIBLE TO DIVIDE OR PERCEPTION OF TIME INTO DISCRETE CHUNKS! JESUS TAP DANCING CHRIST THIS IS AN IMPORTANT TOPIC AND WE SHOULD HAVE A 40 PAGE ARGUMENT ABOUT IT! Besides, where will I find this so-called local quantum physicist? The way the job market is these days, you'll find him greeting customers as they walk into the local Wal-Mart. Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: notme on November 22, 2013, 06:56:32 AM Your local quantum physicist may oppose calling time discrete. lol, the chunks are discrete in order to aid our feeble brains in comprehending the perception of time, not the time itself. The chunks only exists in your linear human brain. No one was stating that the laws of quantum and/or temporal physics are in or can be represented by discrete units of chunks! RELATIVE TO HUMAN LINEAR UNDERSTANDING/PERCEPTION OF SPACE-TIME, IT IS POSSIBLE TO DIVIDE OR PERCEPTION OF TIME INTO DISCRETE CHUNKS! JESUS TAP DANCING CHRIST THIS IS AN IMPORTANT TOPIC AND WE SHOULD HAVE A 40 PAGE ARGUMENT ABOUT IT! Besides, where will I find this so-called local quantum physicist? If the smallest possible unit of distance is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length and the fastest possible speed is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light than there is a smallest discernible time unit implying time is discrete. However getting a quantum physicist to accept the two axioms proposed would be the challenging part. Title: Re: Next Three Major Hurdles for Bitcoin (11-21) Post by: oda.krell on November 22, 2013, 12:34:05 PM Your local quantum physicist may oppose calling time discrete. lol, the chunks are discrete in order to aid our feeble brains in comprehending the perception of time, not the time itself. The chunks only exists in your linear human brain. No one was stating that the laws of quantum and/or temporal physics are in or can be represented by discrete units of chunks! RELATIVE TO HUMAN LINEAR UNDERSTANDING/PERCEPTION OF SPACE-TIME, IT IS POSSIBLE TO DIVIDE OR PERCEPTION OF TIME INTO DISCRETE CHUNKS! JESUS TAP DANCING CHRIST THIS IS AN IMPORTANT TOPIC AND WE SHOULD HAVE A 40 PAGE ARGUMENT ABOUT IT! Besides, where will I find this so-called local quantum physicist? If the smallest possible unit of distance is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length and the fastest possible speed is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light than there is a smallest discernible time unit implying time is discrete. However getting a quantum physicist to accept the two axioms proposed would be the challenging part. Not completely sure it's that simple. Not a physicist myself, but from a half laymanic/half formal class on the current physical understanding of time I got the message that at least in many subfields of physics the question discrete or not would be avoided, since time is not taken to be one of the fundamental properties of their models. I am highly correctable on this one though :) |
