Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: tysat on November 22, 2013, 05:52:43 PM



Title: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: tysat on November 22, 2013, 05:52:43 PM
https://blockchain.info/tx/1c12443203a48f42cdf7b1acee5b4b1c1fedc144cb909a3bf5edbffafb0cd204

Sure is a lot of money to move at one time


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on November 22, 2013, 05:54:23 PM
I rounded it up to 195,000*750 usd it is = 146,250,000 USD


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: mccorvic on November 22, 2013, 05:56:07 PM
I rounded it up to 195,000*750 usd it is = 146,250,000 USD

But if they were to dump it all they'd only get about $35 mil on Gox :D


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: superduh on November 22, 2013, 05:57:00 PM
who is that? do tell


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: ecoin_org on November 22, 2013, 05:57:54 PM
Winklevoss ETF fund. :D


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Stake on November 22, 2013, 05:58:53 PM
Biggest trans. I have ever seen.

Wouldn't be surprised if it was the Winklevii. :P


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: m19 on November 22, 2013, 05:59:36 PM
No transaction fee lol.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on November 22, 2013, 05:59:44 PM
I was just about to mention Winklevoss.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Stake on November 22, 2013, 06:00:08 PM
No transaction fee lol.

Probably not on purpose.

BlockChain is doing that by default now.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: vandeam on November 22, 2013, 06:00:48 PM
Satoshi woke up xD :o


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on November 22, 2013, 06:01:02 PM
Some of the inputs of the outputs are quite old, as old as 2011 June. Edit, looks like an old miner.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: runam0k on November 22, 2013, 06:02:04 PM
Beautiful, so effortless to move so much money.

I'm sometimes involved with very large cross-border transactions and the logistics of making payments of this size are, more often that not, a complete PITA, with timezones and banking hours getting in the way.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Seccour on November 22, 2013, 06:02:10 PM
https://blockchain.info/tx/1c12443203a48f42cdf7b1acee5b4b1c1fedc144cb909a3bf5edbffafb0cd204

Sure is a lot of money to move at one time

Sorry i just move my money :p


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Shermo on November 22, 2013, 06:02:18 PM
It's Richard Branson.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: velacreations on November 22, 2013, 06:02:46 PM
No transaction fee lol.

Probably not on purpose.

BlockChain is doing that by default now.
high priority transaction don't need a fee.

and I really doubt anyone is holding $147M on blockchain.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: icey on November 22, 2013, 06:03:12 PM
Its tagged as 'a shit load of money' lol.. what a balla


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Stake on November 22, 2013, 06:06:12 PM
No transaction fee lol.

Probably not on purpose.

BlockChain is doing that by default now.
high priority transaction don't need a fee.

and I really doubt anyone is holding $147M on blockchain.

True - didn't think of that.

I wonder where one stores $147M in BTC...

Mhmm...  A vault? Lol.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on November 22, 2013, 06:09:04 PM
Could this be satoshi? Some of the inputs(and I mean from going backwards and backwards in the trace) are as old 2010 February and owned by a single miner who donated 500btc to a faucet once.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Stake on November 22, 2013, 06:12:01 PM
No transaction fee lol.

Probably not on purpose.

BlockChain is doing that by default now.
high priority transaction don't need a fee.

and I really doubt anyone is holding $147M on blockchain.

True - didn't think of that.

I wonder where one stores $147M in BTC...

Mhmm...  A vault? Lol.

I would use the Armory client and it's offline wallet feature.

You don't need a vault to protect a bitcoin wallet, that's the beauty of it.

People kill other people for thousands.

If someone knew it was on a computer I'm sure there are MANY people that would be willing to kill for $147M and steal the computer.

Offline clients are safer than online, but not safer than paper wallets.

I'd bury a paper wallet if it held that many BTC.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Stake on November 22, 2013, 06:13:23 PM
Could this be satoshi? Some of the inputs(and I mean from going backwards and backwards in the trace) are as old 2010 February and owned by a single miner who donated 500btc to a faucet once.

Doubt it.

Probably just an old miner or entrepreneur, early adopter with capital willing to risk.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on November 22, 2013, 06:15:40 PM
Could this be satoshi? Some of the inputs(and I mean from going backwards and backwards in the trace) are as old 2010 February and owned by a single miner who donated 500btc to a faucet once.

Doubt it.

Probably just an old miner or entrepreneur, early adopter with capital willing to risk.
I followed more, and he has mined blocks as far as December 25 2009, crazy.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Stake on November 22, 2013, 06:16:06 PM
https://blockchain.info/tx/1c12443203a48f42cdf7b1acee5b4b1c1fedc144cb909a3bf5edbffafb0cd204

Sure is a lot of money to move at one time

Something tells me it is a like gox/bitstamp/coinbase/<insert other bitcoin company> moving funds offline or something.

Also another possibility.

Could this be satoshi? Some of the inputs(and I mean from going backwards and backwards in the trace) are as old 2010 February and owned by a single miner who donated 500btc to a faucet once.

Doubt it.

Probably just an old miner or entrepreneur, early adopter with capital willing to risk.
I followed more, and he has mined blocks as far as December 26 2009, crazy.

It is pretty crazy but this isn't the first instance of seeing this happen.

There are many early adopters that trusted the idea and are now reaping the profits.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Stevenrm87 on November 22, 2013, 06:19:26 PM
Someone preparing to sell?


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: superduh on November 22, 2013, 06:23:34 PM
going back to the earliest transaction won't be much of a clue. you don't know how many times and if those coins ever changed hands or not.

it could however provide some ideas though


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on November 22, 2013, 06:25:16 PM
going back to the earliest transaction won't be much of a clue. you don't know how many times and if those coins ever changed hands or not.

it could however provide some ideas though
True. I am wondering if it isn't that lazslo guy, that bought two pizza for 10k BTC. Since he donated 500btc to the faucet, and I saw he posted something like that, and it is around the same time.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: vandeam on November 22, 2013, 06:26:46 PM
Hope he dumps it slowly..


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Gyrsur on November 22, 2013, 06:28:28 PM
Someone preparing to sell?

Sell??  ;D

http://i40.tinypic.com/15dnwg8.jpg


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Voogru on November 22, 2013, 06:28:41 PM
Hope he dumps it slowly..

Hope he dumps it quickly.

I want cheap coins.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: freedomno1 on November 22, 2013, 06:37:44 PM
Wow that is a a sexy amount
Dump it don't think the price could handle :P


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Aswan on November 22, 2013, 06:42:23 PM
No transaction fee lol.

Probably not on purpose.

BlockChain is doing that by default now.
high priority transaction don't need a fee.

and I really doubt anyone is holding $147M on blockchain.

True - didn't think of that.

I wonder where one stores $147M in BTC...

Mhmm...  A vault? Lol.

I would use the Armory client and it's offline wallet feature.

You don't need a vault to protect a bitcoin wallet, that's the beauty of it.

People kill other people for thousands.

If someone knew it was on a computer I'm sure there are MANY people that would be willing to kill for $147M and steal the computer.

Offline clients are safer than online, but not safer than paper wallets.

I'd bury a paper wallet if it held that many BTC.


Paper wallets are Plain text Private keys, Offline wallets are usually encrypted wallets which only the owner has the passphrase to and at least one copy somewhere else...


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: flatfly on November 22, 2013, 06:59:21 PM
Wow. This means someone controls 1.6667% of all coins in circulation.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: davida on November 22, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Wow. This means someone controls 16.66667% of all coins in circulation.

I think you mean 1.6%   ;)


I would assume that someone who wanted to sell this many coins wouldn't deposit at an exchange to trade them... unless of course they wanted to absolutely destroy the trade price of the asset they are trying to sell. Which doesn't seem very smart to me.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: flatfly on November 22, 2013, 07:14:48 PM
Wow. This means someone controls 16.66667% of all coins in circulation.

I think you mean 1.6%   ;)


I would assume that someone who wanted to sell this many coins wouldn't deposit at an exchange to trade them... unless of course they wanted to absolutely destroy the trade price of the asset they are trying to sell. Which doesn't seem very smart to me.

Sorry, this is what sleep deprivation does... Fixed :)


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: kill-switch on November 22, 2013, 07:27:48 PM
I would assume that someone who wanted to sell this many coins wouldn't deposit at an exchange to trade them... unless of course they wanted to absolutely destroy the trade price of the asset they are trying to sell. Which doesn't seem very smart to me.

I would contend that "destroying the trade price" on exchanges would be a smart move at this stage for large coin holders, or at least not strictly dumb.  It would dissuade some speculatory investment and get more coin in circulation for use as currency to buy goods and services.  The coin concentration problem is a very real one.

Huge speculative buys on exchanges are great for short term gain, but not nearly as good for long term currency status.  Large coin holders will want to sell as little of their coin as possible if they are looking to maximize pure profit; but if they want the idea of decentralized money to take off using Bitcoin, they need adoption rate for merchants and consumers to steadily increase as well.  If they continue to hold tightly, we probably end up with Bitcoin as primarily a store of value, which negates or dulls many of its other useful features.

We will see how many of the early adopters/innovators believe in the idea of Bitcoin, and how many were simply driven by greed.  So far, with the amount of old coins sitting idle, I'd say we can see where it's going unless something changes.  That said, I am curious where these coins will go.  :)


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: crazy_rabbit on November 22, 2013, 07:44:01 PM
It's probably gox moving coins around, or one of the really big investors changing their savings strategy.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: superduh on November 22, 2013, 07:49:07 PM
pirateat40?

who is it? come here and state so


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: bennybong on November 22, 2013, 08:08:10 PM
Satoshi? Is that you?


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Ekaros on November 22, 2013, 08:25:11 PM
Will someone test what is the real market cap?


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: l.j2300 on November 22, 2013, 08:32:26 PM
No transaction fee lol.

Probably not on purpose.

BlockChain is doing that by default now.
high priority transaction don't need a fee.

and I really doubt anyone is holding $147M on blockchain.

True - didn't think of that.

I wonder where one stores $147M in BTC...

Mhmm...  A vault? Lol.

I would use the Armory client and it's offline wallet feature.

You don't need a vault to protect a bitcoin wallet, that's the beauty of it.

People kill other people for thousands.

If someone knew it was on a computer I'm sure there are MANY people that would be willing to kill for $147M and steal the computer.

Offline clients are safer than online, but not safer than paper wallets.

I'd bury a paper wallet if it held that many BTC.


Paper wallets are Plain text Private keys, Offline wallets are usually encrypted wallets which only the owner has the passphrase to and at least one copy somewhere else...

Exactly. Encryption is a powerful tool and Bitcoin allows us to use that tool to protect our money.

I'd bury an encrypted paper wallet if it held that many BTC (sadly Armory does not allow for the printing of encrypted paper wallets, so you must find another way).

INB4 $5 wrench.

Actually etothepi is releasing a new version of Armory today which works with Ubuntu 10.04 that allows for printing encrypted paper wallets.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Gyrsur on November 22, 2013, 08:38:57 PM
do theymos own blockexplorer.com?


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: klaus on November 22, 2013, 08:40:14 PM
do theymos own blockexplorer.com?

yes

https://i.imgur.com/RH4yvi4.gif


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Gyrsur on November 22, 2013, 08:41:21 PM
do theymos own blockexplorer.com?

yes

not anymore. :/


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Mjbmonetarymetals on November 22, 2013, 08:45:08 PM
I demand someone tracks this immediately - I want the where, when, why, who on my desk by 10am GMT .... Anonymous my too-too.  ;D


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: bitjoint on November 22, 2013, 08:47:10 PM
"Shit load of money" but he doesn't pay transaction fee... LOL

What a legend


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Gyrsur on November 22, 2013, 08:47:22 PM
I demand someone tracks this immediately - I want the where, when, why, who on my desk by 10am GMT .... Anonymous my too-too.  ;D

lol very funny. a lot of apps demand the realtime stats of blockexplorer.com


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: drrussellshane on November 22, 2013, 08:50:53 PM
"Shit load of money" but he doesn't pay transaction fee... LOL

What a legend

You don't get shitloads of money by paying transaction fees!

 ;D


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: dominicwin on November 22, 2013, 08:51:30 PM
so Amazing! What an incredible amount of money today in bitcoin.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Its About Sharing on November 22, 2013, 09:09:44 PM
How long does it take to make it into the Bitcoin Days Destroyed charts?
Here is the 30 day chart and there is no rise from this transfer:
https://blockchain.info/charts/bitcoin-days-destroyed?timespan=30days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=30&show_header=true&scale=0&address= (https://blockchain.info/charts/bitcoin-days-destroyed?timespan=30days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=30&show_header=true&scale=0&address=)

I have solace knowing that this is not going to be a dump as it is an old school long time holder. But might start selling some, taper the fast rise some.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Its About Sharing on November 22, 2013, 09:17:39 PM
I have solace knowing that this is not going to be a dump as it is an old school long time holder.

Or was confiscated from an old school long time holder.

Confiscated implies some wrongdoing. I see nothing to warrant an accusation like that.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: BCB on November 22, 2013, 09:21:33 PM

No he sold it to turnkey linux. I forgot the guys name, but I am trying to buy it as soon as it is released. I have contacted namecheap in hopes of bring it back to a block explorer.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1727.msg1539613#msg1539613


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Kluge on November 22, 2013, 09:22:19 PM
I have solace knowing that this is not going to be a dump as it is an old school long time holder.

Or was confiscated from an old school long time holder.

Confiscated implies some wrongdoing. I see nothing to warrant an accusation like that.
There's nothing to imply "rightdoing." This could be Queen Elizabeth II's stash of Bitcoins from selling cocaine on Silk Road for all we know.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: drrussellshane on November 22, 2013, 09:25:06 PM
I have solace knowing that this is not going to be a dump as it is an old school long time holder.

Or was confiscated from an old school long time holder.

Confiscated implies some wrongdoing. I see nothing to warrant an accusation like that.
There's nothing to imply "rightdoing." This could be Queen Elizabeth II's stash of Bitcoins from selling cocaine on Silk Road for all we know.

Did she tell you that?

She's usually more discreet.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Gyrsur on November 22, 2013, 09:30:38 PM

No he sold it to turnkey linux. I forgot the guys name, but I am trying to buy it as soon as it is released. I have contacted namecheap in hopes of bring it back to a block explorer.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1727.msg1539613#msg1539613

thank you! a lot of time passed away with no further announcement.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Boxman90 on November 22, 2013, 09:31:24 PM
Will someone test what is the real market cap?
9,294,822,550 USD
http://bitcoinwatch.com/

You must be an absolute fool to believe that 9.2 billion USD actually flowed into Bitcoin.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Its About Sharing on November 22, 2013, 09:34:04 PM
I have solace knowing that this is not going to be a dump as it is an old school long time holder.

Or was confiscated from an old school long time holder.

Confiscated implies some wrongdoing. I see nothing to warrant an accusation like that.
There's nothing to imply "rightdoing." This could be Queen Elizabeth II's stash of Bitcoins from selling cocaine on Silk Road for all we know.

It is an old miner. Old miners were mostly believers in BTC. It had no value back then. If they didn't believe they would have sold by now.

If someone wants to dump that many coins it would hurt the seller dumping them at once. Clearly they would be doing it to kill confidence and the price. That would be temporary. They would have to sell them across the big 4 exchanges. That would probably bring the price down to the 200's or 300's judging by the market depth.

All conjecture at this point but I have faith in an old miner. Time will tell, that much we can agree on.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Its About Sharing on November 22, 2013, 09:35:34 PM
Will someone test what is the real market cap?
9,294,822,550 USD
http://bitcoinwatch.com/

You must be an absolute fool to believe that 9.2 billion USD actually flowed into Bitcoin.

Market cap does not mean the amount of money that flowed into a stock. It is a simple metric, number of outstanding shares times the price.
Perhaps think before name calling.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Boxman90 on November 22, 2013, 09:42:46 PM
Will someone test what is the real market cap?
9,294,822,550 USD
http://bitcoinwatch.com/

You must be an absolute fool to believe that 9.2 billion USD actually flowed into Bitcoin.

Market cap does not mean the amount of money that flowed into a stock. It is a simple metric, number of outstanding shares times the price.
Perhaps think before name calling.

Some seem to believe it does. Obviously Ekaros hinted at that by mentioning 'real market cap'. Bitcoin has not enough liquidity to live up to that number of 9 Billion, not even close. That number by 50 is what you could get out if you wanted, maybe.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Zibbo on November 22, 2013, 09:43:23 PM
Artforz finally cashing out? :)


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Its About Sharing on November 22, 2013, 09:51:24 PM
Will someone test what is the real market cap?
9,294,822,550 USD
http://bitcoinwatch.com/

You must be an absolute fool to believe that 9.2 billion USD actually flowed into Bitcoin.

Market cap does not mean the amount of money that flowed into a stock. It is a simple metric, number of outstanding shares times the price.
Perhaps think before name calling.

Some seem to believe it does. Obviously Ekaros hinted at that by mentioning 'real market cap'. Bitcoin has not enough liquidity to live up to that number of 9 Billion, not even close. That number by 50 is what you could get out if you wanted, maybe.

I'm not sure I follow you. If we look at the order book, there is a pretty solid number that we know (how many buyers below, sellers above - though manipulated). There are also orders not on the orderbook - and perhaps they dwarf it.

Well, anyway, with all that BTC represents, perhaps it is fair to say that it deserves a HUGE market cap. We have a stock (in the network), asset, currency, protocol, development platform, commodity, etc. all in one. And, it is in the financial sector during a time of crisis. We have a new entity and by all measure, it certainly seems to be moving up in an S-Curve fashion.

I would not be shocked in 5 years to see the "market cap" at 1 Trillion USD. But likewise, I would not be shocked (just saddened if the mission was not accomplished or set in motion) if it was lower than now.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Lauda on November 22, 2013, 09:52:03 PM
I wonder why everyone is just writing bunch of random names of random people that allegedly have a big amount of coins.
Wouldn't it be more likely that Satoshi is moving some of his coins around?


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: pontiacg5 on November 22, 2013, 09:59:21 PM
I wonder why everyone is just writing bunch of random names of random people that allegedly have a big amount of coins.
Wouldn't it be more likely that Satoshi is moving some of his coins around?

Why do you do what you do?

Sorry  ;D


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: adamstgBit on November 22, 2013, 10:02:26 PM
please distribute these coins ASAP poeple need them


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Dabs on November 22, 2013, 10:16:12 PM
Maybe it's Hal. I'd like to escrow that kind of transaction. My  fee is only 1% and can probably be lowered or fixed.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Lauda on November 22, 2013, 10:20:04 PM
please distribute these coins ASAP poeple need them
I doubt that the person will share to the poeple.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: thehashman on November 22, 2013, 11:27:32 PM
Quote
I'd buy a paper wallet if it held that many BTC.

Where is the best place to obtain a paper wallet?


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Kluge on November 22, 2013, 11:28:43 PM
Quote
I'd buy a paper wallet if it held that many BTC.

Where is the best place to obtain a paper wallet?
Your printer, generally.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: adamstgBit on November 22, 2013, 11:35:37 PM
Quote
I'd buy a paper wallet if it held that many BTC.

Where is the best place to obtain a paper wallet?

https://www.bitaddress.org/


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Mondy on November 22, 2013, 11:36:55 PM
Holy bitcoin! id be happy with 0.01% oh that :O


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: WillBit on November 23, 2013, 12:21:04 AM
Seems reckless to keep that many coins in one wallet.  Why not break it up into 10 wallets with 20,000 bitcoins each?

Seems foolish if they really are moving them to cash out.  Why not wait a couple years until bitcoins are $5,000+ and become one the world's first Bitcoin Billionaires?


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: wmcleod on November 23, 2013, 12:23:16 AM
Seems reckless to keep that many coins in one wallet.  Why not break it up into 10 wallets with 20,000 bitcoins each?

Seems foolish if they really are moving them to cash out.  Why not wait a couple years until bitcoins are $5,000+ and become one the world's first Bitcoin Billionaires?
[/quote

Most likely this person does have alternate wallets...


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: dserrano5 on November 23, 2013, 12:25:04 AM
please distribute these coins ASAP poeple need them

Yeah I could use some! Black friday is 'round the corner.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Mondy on November 23, 2013, 12:33:16 AM
Seems reckless to keep that many coins in one wallet.  Why not break it up into 10 wallets with 20,000 bitcoins each?

Seems foolish if they really are moving them to cash out.  Why not wait a couple years until bitcoins are $5,000+ and become one the world's first Bitcoin Billionaires?

They are splitting them up.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Kluge on November 23, 2013, 12:39:52 AM
Need more rich trolls.

153apNjAQ96uKdxGYBEvzHYB8UpoeyaYdn
V
1FollowAQ96uKdxGYBEvzHYB8UpoeyaYdn
V
1CluesjAQ96uKdxGYBEvzHYB8UpoeyaYdn
V
1ForpNjAQ96uKdxGYBEvzHYB8UpoeyaYdn
V
1PrivNjAQ96uKdxGYBEvzHYB8UpoeyaYdn
V
1KeypNjAQ96uKdxGYBEvzHYB8UpoeyaYdn

Vanity address riddles costing many, many weeks of peoples' time in subsequent transactions. Eventually, it leads to a hosted, encrypted archive (password and URL found by solving all the riddles) with a .txt in it - "lol jk."


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: bitcoinpsftp on November 23, 2013, 12:40:20 AM
That's just ridiculous... Numbers like these make we wonder if bitcoin will survive.. how can ANYONE have that many bitcoins o_0

If bitcoin succeeds... there will be so many billionaires made it's not even funny.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: porcupine87 on November 23, 2013, 01:01:08 AM
That's just ridiculous... Numbers like these make we wonder if bitcoin will survive.. how can ANYONE have that many bitcoins o_0

If bitcoin succeeds... there will be so many billionaires made it's not even funny.

Anything else would be strange...


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on November 23, 2013, 01:55:30 AM
Will someone test what is the real market cap?
9,294,822,550 USD
http://bitcoinwatch.com/

You must be an absolute fool to believe that 9.2 billion USD actually flowed into Bitcoin.

Market cap does not mean the amount of money that flowed into a stock. It is a simple metric, number of outstanding shares times the price.
Perhaps think before name calling.

Some seem to believe it does. Obviously Ekaros hinted at that by mentioning 'real market cap'. Bitcoin has not enough liquidity to live up to that number of 9 Billion, not even close. That number by 50 is what you could get out if you wanted, maybe.

I'm not sure I follow you. If we look at the order book, there is a pretty solid number that we know (how many buyers below, sellers above - though manipulated). There are also orders not on the orderbook - and perhaps they dwarf it.

Well, anyway, with all that BTC represents, perhaps it is fair to say that it deserves a HUGE market cap. We have a stock (in the network), asset, currency, protocol, development platform, commodity, etc. all in one. And, it is in the financial sector during a time of crisis. We have a new entity and by all measure, it certainly seems to be moving up in an S-Curve fashion.

I would not be shocked in 5 years to see the "market cap" at 1 Trillion USD. But likewise, I would not be shocked (just saddened if the mission was not accomplished or set in motion) if it was lower than now.

That would equate to ~$75,000 USD per bitcoin. Do you realize how much barn wood I could buy with that? And earn 500% profit when I sell it. I can...let me do the math...WoW! I can buy a new truck... and a couple goats.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Izerian on November 23, 2013, 03:32:14 AM
Beautiful, so effortless to move so much money

+1 couldn't agree more

Sorry for the old bump


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: BitchicksHusband on November 23, 2013, 03:35:21 AM
No transaction fee lol.

Probably not on purpose.

BlockChain is doing that by default now.
high priority transaction don't need a fee.

and I really doubt anyone is holding $147M on blockchain.

True - didn't think of that.

I wonder where one stores $147M in BTC...

Mhmm...  A vault? Lol.


Brainwallet.  :D


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Dabs on November 23, 2013, 09:18:21 AM
Oh, hey, whoever you are, vtc.com is for sale for about 12,500 BTC at current rates, and I'm willing to do the escrow. I think its priced in fiat, just using BTC to do the trade. It was going for 75,000 BTC last month, but the USD rate then was only 133 per BTC.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: DoomDumas on November 23, 2013, 09:24:09 AM
About coin distribution..

Because Bihthttp://bitcoinrichlist.com/top100p://bitcoinrichlist.com/top100coin are not mainstream yet, for sure only a very small proportion of the population own Bitcoin.  Some own a lot.  If we compare the coin distribution compared to the fiat distribution, I think fiat currencies are much more concentrated in the pocket of a few.

Bitcoin : 30% in the top 500 wallet..   http://bitcoinrichlist.com/top100 (http://bitcoinrichlist.com/top100)

I beleive that more then 80% of all fiat currencies are in the pocket of less than 500 human beings..

So, even if not yet mainstream, Bitcoins are much more distributed than other currencies.

As the Bitcoin ecosystem grows, it should become even more distributed.

Gratz to the whealty ones, they search for alternatives and found BTC.  They also understood the true power of it, and had strong hands to be able not to sell.  They are rightfully whealty, by merit !

Was my 0.0000002 btc



Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: r3wt on November 23, 2013, 09:38:20 AM
This is a company most likely. it was relayed by an ip fromHetzner's server block(german hosting company), and includes addresses for coinbase and other vendors.

i followed the bulk of it to this address https://blockchain.info/address/13f6vcKNGZxp6xegD3e5vNYvHHPMSk7mxj?show_adv=true


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: revilo on November 23, 2013, 01:16:29 PM
Can't they just give me like 10 BTC.
Or cant they give 1 BTC to 100,000 people!  :'(


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: bythesea on November 23, 2013, 01:25:57 PM
I made a post but didn't see it was there already :(

Also I looked a bit and noticed that someone also moved about 100,000 today
https://blockchain.info/address/13f6vcKNGZxp6xegD3e5vNYvHHPMSk7mxj


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Trade101 on November 23, 2013, 02:17:16 PM
someone preparing to cash their $$$ in when bitcoin hits 1000/BTC



Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Zangelbert Bingledack on November 23, 2013, 04:10:51 PM
I made a post but didn't see it was there already :(

Also I looked a bit and noticed that someone also moved about 100,000 today
https://blockchain.info/address/13f6vcKNGZxp6xegD3e5vNYvHHPMSk7mxj

Is that a whale messaging Satoshi? Or is that public note added by someone else?


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Lauda on November 24, 2013, 04:26:37 PM
someone preparing to cash their $$$ in when bitcoin hits 1000/BTC


I doubt that.


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: dishwara on November 24, 2013, 07:16:21 PM
Artforz finally cashing out? :)
maybe


Title: Re: 194,993 BTC transaction
Post by: Cryddit on November 24, 2013, 07:39:27 PM
You realize that someone who wanted full current value for his coins (and sanity for the bitcoin economy itself) would not kill the price; he'd just stop the price from rising quite so fast.  Offer a bunch of coins at $1000 setting up a "wall" there that takes a week or so to break, even with newbies getting in as fast as they can, then let it roll for a little while and set up another "wall" at $1200, etc.  People with that kind of money can choose to just plain *stop* the price from going hyperbolic (and then crashing) when mainstream adoption kicks in. 

And that may be what they're getting ready to do.  We've been with the highs and the crashes for years, but we're not the mainstream yet.  The mainstream would be terrified to get into something and *then* discover that it's as volatile as it's been for us.

Anyway, someone with this kind of coin can do a lot to dampen volatility.