Title: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: muflix on February 25, 2011, 04:20:37 PM Hello, i have
Intel Core2Duo E6600 2400Mhz (CPUZ shows) and im only generating 2100 khash/s is it normal ? can i increase it? i was looking about poclbm_py2 but i have only GeForce 7950GT with no OpenCL support :x and next question.. i generated 110400 blocks pretty fast but now it freezed and i got 1 block per xx minutes.. (8connections) what happened.. im new to BitCoins so sorry for newbie asking :-) thx for reply Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: theGECK on February 25, 2011, 04:30:00 PM I'm assuming you're using the official bitcoin program for generating, so 2100kHash/s sounds about right to me. If you want more, you'll need to look into CPU/GPU mining and running the bitcoin client in server mode so you can do that, or look into joining a pool.
As for the blocks, you weren't generating those 11k blocks, you were downloading the block chain. Once you have the entire chain downloaded, you will be downloading a new block ~10 minutes. This is done so that your client can verify which transactions are valid, and which are not. Generating a new block is where new transactions are initially confirmed through a cryptographic process. Feel free to ask any other questions, or tell me I haven't explained this well enough! Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: Garrett Burgwardt on February 25, 2011, 04:30:42 PM Welcome to the forums :)
The blocks you say you were 'generating' you were merely downloading from other nodes - that is the block chain that contains the list of all transactions in bitcoin's history. Odds are you aren't generating anything at only 2100 khash/s, that is rather low, CPU mining is essentially useless at this point, (un)fortunately. You can use the calculator here: http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php You're watching other people find blocks, not generating them yourself. Though perhaps you've gotten lucky and found one - if so you'll have a credit for 50 bitcoins in your wallet. Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: muflix on February 26, 2011, 11:15:30 AM Thank you, i turned bitcoin into server mode, but khash/s not changed much so i joined into pool and i have khash ~1100 (jgarzik's CPU miner with cryptopp_asm32 parameter) that seems not bad. But i want to ask, you said im using official bitcoin miner.. that means i can use some unofficial ? I didnt find any.. only some RPC miner.. which if i joined with some my friends PC and we will mine together it will be more effective maybe? :-)
edit: I find in command line, where im running cpu miner this Code: ... and after that (im generating coins in bitcoin client too with pool together) khash/s jumped from ~1100 back to ~2100 in default client.. so i think pool stopped work but dont know. Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: khal on February 26, 2011, 11:50:53 AM Launch the jgarzik's CPU miner with "--threads 2" and you should go back to 2x1100khash/sec like that :
HashMeter(0): 4537024 hashes, 1081.21 khash/sec HashMeter(1): 4537024 hashes, 1042.21 khash/sec You should not generate in the official client (or server) at the same time of course. Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: xenon481 on February 26, 2011, 01:34:42 PM Since you have an Intel CPU, you should be using the SSE2 CPU Miner, not jgarzik's. It appears the average performance (on Intel chips) is on the order of ~450% of jgarzik's.
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486.0 Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: pla on February 26, 2011, 02:30:26 PM Since you have an Intel CPU, you should be using the SSE2 CPU Miner, not jgarzik's. It appears the average performance (on Intel chips) is on the order of ~450% of jgarzik's. I have a similar setup (same CPU family, don't know the speed offhand) - It gets about twice the performance using the straight CPU miner (PuddinPop's) that it does using the SSE version... And 2100 kh/s sounds about right. Also, muflix, if you actually hope to mine any Bitcoins, you'll want to join a pool ASAP. At 2100kh/s, you have basically zero chance of ever getting a block of 50. For comparison, I have a total of about 5000kh/s contributing to Slush's pool, and I earned my first whole BTC just last night, after almost two weeks of mining. Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: muflix on February 27, 2011, 08:06:23 PM ah ok, so i tried these miners on localhost (no openCL or CUDA)
bitcoin-miner.exe [2 threads using SSE2 - ~5.5 MHash/s] rpcminer-cpu.exe [2 threads - ~2100 khash/s] rpcminer-4way.exe [2 threads - ~1300 khash/s] and its really better thanks :) i tried to join slush's pool mining.bitcoin.cz (right?) but registration there is temporarily closed.. so is there any alternative pools? Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: Ricochet on February 27, 2011, 08:20:43 PM Deepbit is also open, though the SSE2 miner ("bitcoin-miner.exe") is not compatible. You'd have to use the RPC miner or jgarzik's CPU miner.
Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: muflix on February 27, 2011, 09:16:34 PM ok thanks.. deepbit.net works ~2100 khash/s
and i can choose between Proportional and Pay-Per-Share reward what o you think is better to me (low generating) ? :-) Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: Ricochet on February 27, 2011, 09:20:44 PM I'm still investigating that myself. In theory, over an extended period of time, it'll average out to be simply a matter of the service fees associated with each one (3% for proportional, 10% for pay-per-share). It's a matter of personal preference I guess.
Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: muflix on February 27, 2011, 10:26:58 PM ok thank you i will let it default for now.. and be waiting for open slush's pool :)
Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: [Tycho] on February 27, 2011, 11:09:36 PM Deepbit is also open, though the SSE2 miner ("bitcoin-miner.exe") is not compatible. You'd have to use the RPC miner or jgarzik's CPU miner. May be ufasoft will fix his miner soon, i told him about the bug.Title: Re: only ~2100 khash/s Post by: Ricochet on February 27, 2011, 11:28:10 PM I hope this is the case, as the SSE2 miner gets the best hash rates on my laptop's Core 2 Duo processor. The more options the better, right? =D
|