Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Service Announcements (Altcoins) => Topic started by: mtbitcoin on January 09, 2014, 08:11:53 AM

Title: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 09, 2014, 08:11:53 AM

Hi

Blockscan.com is a Counterparty Block Explorer built from scratch for the sole purpose of looking up any Counterparty related transactions. The block explorer was developed and is maintained independently

In addition to the block explorer functionality, there is also an account services module where you can perform additional functions such as setting up email alerts (to alert you when you receive tokens at your address) and or updating/adding additional blockscan metadata information for your assets.

The official site is available at http://www.blockscan.com and can also be accessed via https://www.blockscan.com

If you have any suggestions, feedback or bug reports do let us know by posting here. We can also be contacted via http://www.blockscan.com/contact for matters relating to blockscan only

Cheers

<Edited>

Title: Re: [ANN] CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 09, 2014, 08:12:09 AM

[Reserved]

Title: Re: [ANN] CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: PhantomPhreak on January 09, 2014, 11:11:28 AM

Hi.

Just a thought, but you might post a link to this thread on the official Counterparty discussion thread.

Cheers.

EDIT: You might also want to rename the thread to distinguish it from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=404562.0;all (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=404562.0;all).

Title: Re: [ANN] CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 09, 2014, 11:52:05 AM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on January 09, 2014, 11:11:28 AM

Noted.. I've renamed the thread a bit

I did make a post on the official thread but I think it got buried a bit :)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: peled1986 on January 11, 2014, 06:02:27 PM

great job!
http://www.blockscan.com/default.aspx is looking really good

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 08:45:13 PM

Awesome site, thanks for putting this together!

It would be great to have a page listing all created assets and details about them, any chance you implement this?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 16, 2014, 04:57:27 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 08:45:13 PM

Awesome site, thanks for putting this together!

It would be great to have a page listing all created assets and details about them, any chance you implement this?

The asset lists is now available at http://blockscan.com/asset.aspx

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: maxmint on January 16, 2014, 09:55:21 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 16, 2014, 04:57:27 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 08:45:13 PM

Awesome site, thanks for putting this together!

It would be great to have a page listing all created assets and details about them, any chance you implement this?

The asset lists is now available at http://blockscan.com/asset.aspx

Cheers

Great, thanks for putting that up so quickly. Is there a donation address for your site?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 18, 2014, 03:43:43 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 16, 2014, 09:55:21 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 16, 2014, 04:57:27 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 08:45:13 PM

Awesome site, thanks for putting this together!

It would be great to have a page listing all created assets and details about them, any chance you implement this?

The asset lists is now available at http://blockscan.com/asset.aspx

Cheers

Great, thanks for putting that up so quickly. Is there a donation address for your site?

Thank you. If you have any additional comments or suggestions please feel free to post them here.

If you would like to donate please do so by donating directly to the XCP project developers via the donation address at 12J1YFvsWHDCU5HNAWNLNy1Q9nZo8Q4Xgs

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.0

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: jimhsu on January 18, 2014, 03:47:23 AM

Wow, people have been busy with opportunistic asset name creation. Almost feels like the old Web 1.0 days of domain squatting...

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: maxmint on January 18, 2014, 11:11:56 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 18, 2014, 03:43:43 AM

Already donated to the developers of course but would like to send you something as well – the site is awesome.
Some more suggestions:
- Make the search box accept asset names
- Show % of all XCP next to an address balance
- There's something wrong in the dividends view on the asset list, e.g. here: http://blockscan.com/assetInfo.aspx?q=VOID (columns seem to be mixed up)

Keep up the great work!

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: maxmint on January 18, 2014, 05:15:27 PM

Just noticed your Login for asset issuers, that's great!
I would suggest adding something unique (e.g. timestamp) to the message otherwise anyone intercepting the signature could login at any time.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 18, 2014, 07:33:50 PM

Quote from: maxmint on January 18, 2014, 11:11:56 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 18, 2014, 03:43:43 AM

Those are actually good suggestions.. I have updated the site with your suggestions and fixed the dividend issue

My donation address is 1bLockjTFXuSENM8fGdfNUaWqiM4GPe7V

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 18, 2014, 07:37:09 PM

Quote from: jimhsu on January 18, 2014, 03:47:23 AM

Wow, people have been busy with opportunistic asset name creation. Almost feels like the old Web 1.0 days of domain squatting...

Yea :D

But unlike domain names you have to transfer your private key over. And I doubt that anyone is going to trust someone to just hand over the private keys without keeping a copy. Lolz...

Well, lets see how this plays out.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: jimhsu on January 18, 2014, 08:02:26 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 18, 2014, 07:37:09 PM

Quote from: jimhsu on January 18, 2014, 03:47:23 AM

Wow, people have been busy with opportunistic asset name creation. Almost feels like the old Web 1.0 days of domain squatting...

Hey, that's what "send" is for .... though you'd have to issue the maximum permissible amount and send that to actually transfer ownership.

Come to think of it though, can devs implement a way to transfer "issuance privileges" so that the above doesn't have to be done?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 19, 2014, 01:59:33 PM

Quote from: jimhsu on January 18, 2014, 08:02:26 PM

Out of curiosity how many assets did you "pre-book" ? :D

I noticed a bunch of same addresses hitting the assets.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: maxmint on January 20, 2014, 11:38:45 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 18, 2014, 07:33:50 PM

Quote from: maxmint on January 18, 2014, 11:11:56 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 18, 2014, 03:43:43 AM

Those are actually good suggestions.. I have updated the site with your suggestions and fixed the dividend issue

My donation address is 1bLockjTFXuSENM8fGdfNUaWqiM4GPe7V

Great, thanks for implementing this – I sent a little tip.

Btw: it seems blockscan is stuck at block 281531 and doesn't show the recent transactions.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 21, 2014, 03:05:20 AM

Thanks for the tip!

Looks like there was another bug with the blocks.py code. I've pulled the latest git and it looks like we are good to go again

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Ratanol on January 28, 2014, 04:22:03 PM

FYI Web of Trust is reporting this site as Blockscan as having malware on it...

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 28, 2014, 06:48:23 PM

Quote from: Ratanol on January 28, 2014, 04:22:03 PM

FYI Web of Trust is reporting this site as Blockscan as having malware on it...

Hi

Are there any explanations or specific pages for the report. I am unable to see nor detect any of the reported malware on the site

cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 29, 2014, 06:29:39 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 28, 2014, 06:48:23 PM

Quote from: Ratanol on January 28, 2014, 04:22:03 PM

FYI Web of Trust is reporting this site as Blockscan as having malware on it...

Hi

Are there any explanations or specific pages for the report. I am unable to see nor detect any of the reported malware on the site

cheers

I've taken another looks at this and I am pretty certain that this is false positive due to the .js code inserted by cloudflare (reverse proxy)

cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Alias on February 03, 2014, 09:41:06 AM

Hi there mtbitcoin.

First of all, Blockscan is great! It was a wonderful resource during the burn-in period and surely will continue to be of great use as the project develops further. One important utility during the price discovery phase of a cryptocurrency is data about the completed trades and the total market capitalisation. If you could have a URL of the last trade price in XCP/BTC on the decentralised exchange then that would be sufficient along with the total number of XCP (2,648,755.9218) to get Counterparty listed on coinmarketcap.com. You could obviously implement your own data visualization and analysis on Blockscan too.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Keep up the good work.

Regards,
Al

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 03, 2014, 03:56:58 PM

Quote from: Alias on February 03, 2014, 09:41:06 AM

Good suggestions!

I will look into those.. I was just thinking about what to replace the main page with now that the burn period is over

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: kdrop22 on February 04, 2014, 12:08:25 AM

Great tool...

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: 520Bit on February 06, 2014, 02:44:08 AM

Using counterpartyd_build with command counterpartyd asset MPSTOCK, fetch the result:

Code:

c:\counterpartyd_build>counterpartyd asset MPTSTOCK

c:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Asset Name: MPTSTOCK
Asset ID: 101249773934
Total Issued: 200.0
Divisible: True
Issuer: 1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA

While I checkd the asset MPSTOCKF in counterpartyd_build, it shows:

Code:

c:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 613, in <module>
    total = util.devise(db, total, args.asset, 'output')
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\util.py", line 318, in devise
    if not issuances: raise exceptions.AssetError('No such asset: {}'.format(asset))
lib.exceptions.AssetError: No such asset: [color=red]MPTSTOCKF[/color]

But when I check above information in blockscan.com, which shows:

Code:

Asset Info  MPTSTOCKF

Disclaimer: Blockscan is not resposible for the accuracy of the content listed here.

Overview
Dividends
Updates
Contacts
  Asset_ID:	  2632494122289
  Issuer:	  1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA
  Time Stamp:	  2/1/2014 10:45:57 PM
  Transaction:	  2843 recorded at Block #283652
  Tx Hash:	  91aed459a4cb1bbd500e1ffea62e84a0c8988971d251d307f7485d6cd57d79a8
  Total Amount Issued:	  [Issue No.1 at Block#283652] 10000000000
  Divisible:	  True
  Transfer:	  False
  Remark:	  Valid

The difference between counterpartyd_build and blockscan.com:

counterpartyd_build:

Asset Name: MPTSTOCK
Asset ID: 101249773934
Total Issued: 200.0

blockscan.com:

Asset Info MPTSTOCKF
  Asset_ID:    2632494122289
  Issuer:    1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA
  Time Stamp:    2/1/2014 10:45:57 PM
  Transaction:    2843 recorded at Block #283652
  Tx Hash:    91aed459a4cb1bbd500e1ffea62e84a0c8988971d251d307f7485d6cd57d79a8
  Total Amount Issued:    [Issue No.1 at Block#283652] 10000000000

My question is , which one is correct? I have marked the difference in red.

I also posted this at: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.2440

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: PhantomPhreak on February 06, 2014, 04:46:01 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 06, 2014, 02:44:08 AM

Using counterpartyd_build with command counterpartyd asset MPSTOCK, fetch the result:

Code:

c:\counterpartyd_build>counterpartyd asset MPTSTOCK

c:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Asset Name: MPTSTOCK
Asset ID: 101249773934
Total Issued: 200.0
Divisible: True
Issuer: 1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA

While I checkd the asset MPSTOCKF in counterpartyd_build, it shows:

Code:

c:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 613, in <module>
    total = util.devise(db, total, args.asset, 'output')
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\util.py", line 318, in devise
    if not issuances: raise exceptions.AssetError('No such asset: {}'.format(asset))
lib.exceptions.AssetError: No such asset: [color=red]MPTSTOCKF[/color]

But when I check above information in blockscan.com, which shows:

Code:

Asset Info  MPTSTOCKF

Disclaimer: Blockscan is not resposible for the accuracy of the content listed here.

Overview
Dividends
Updates
Contacts
  Asset_ID:	  2632494122289
  Issuer:	  1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA
  Time Stamp:	  2/1/2014 10:45:57 PM
  Transaction:	  2843 recorded at Block #283652
  Tx Hash:	  91aed459a4cb1bbd500e1ffea62e84a0c8988971d251d307f7485d6cd57d79a8
  Total Amount Issued:	  [Issue No.1 at Block#283652] 10000000000
  Divisible:	  True
  Transfer:	  False
  Remark:	  Valid

Unless I'm missing something, counterpartyd is correct.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: PhantomPhreak on February 06, 2014, 04:50:14 AM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on February 06, 2014, 04:46:01 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 06, 2014, 02:44:08 AM

Using counterpartyd_build with command counterpartyd asset MPSTOCK, fetch the result:

Code:

c:\counterpartyd_build>counterpartyd asset MPTSTOCK

c:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Asset Name: MPTSTOCK
Asset ID: 101249773934
Total Issued: 200.0
Divisible: True
Issuer: 1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA

While I checkd the asset MPSTOCKF in counterpartyd_build, it shows:

Code:

c:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 613, in <module>
    total = util.devise(db, total, args.asset, 'output')
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\util.py", line 318, in devise
    if not issuances: raise exceptions.AssetError('No such asset: {}'.format(asset))
lib.exceptions.AssetError: No such asset: [color=red]MPTSTOCKF[/color]

But when I check above information in blockscan.com, which shows:

Code:

Asset Info  MPTSTOCKF

Disclaimer: Blockscan is not resposible for the accuracy of the content listed here.

Overview
Dividends
Updates
Contacts
  Asset_ID:	  2632494122289
  Issuer:	  1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA
  Time Stamp:	  2/1/2014 10:45:57 PM
  Transaction:	  2843 recorded at Block #283652
  Tx Hash:	  91aed459a4cb1bbd500e1ffea62e84a0c8988971d251d307f7485d6cd57d79a8
  Total Amount Issued:	  [Issue No.1 at Block#283652] 10000000000
  Divisible:	  True
  Transfer:	  False
  Remark:	  Valid

Unless I'm missing something, counterpartyd is correct.

Actually, this is the correct:

Code:

$ counterpartyd.py asset MPTSTOCKF
Asset Name: MPTSTOCKF
Asset ID: 101249773934
Total Issued: 100.0
Divisible: True

The first issuance missed the 5 XCP fee.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: 520Bit on February 06, 2014, 04:54:37 AM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on February 06, 2014, 04:50:14 AM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on February 06, 2014, 04:46:01 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 06, 2014, 02:44:08 AM

Using counterpartyd_build with command counterpartyd asset MPSTOCK, fetch the result:

Code:

c:\counterpartyd_build>counterpartyd asset MPTSTOCK

c:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Asset Name: MPTSTOCK
Asset ID: 101249773934
Total Issued: 200.0
Divisible: True
Issuer: 1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA

While I checkd the asset MPSTOCKF in counterpartyd_build, it shows:

Code:

c:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 613, in <module>
    total = util.devise(db, total, args.asset, 'output')
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\util.py", line 318, in devise
    if not issuances: raise exceptions.AssetError('No such asset: {}'.format(asset))
lib.exceptions.AssetError: No such asset: [color=red]MPTSTOCKF[/color]

But when I check above information in blockscan.com, which shows:

Code:

Asset Info  MPTSTOCKF

Disclaimer: Blockscan is not resposible for the accuracy of the content listed here.

Overview
Dividends
Updates
Contacts
  Asset_ID:	  2632494122289
  Issuer:	  1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA
  Time Stamp:	  2/1/2014 10:45:57 PM
  Transaction:	  2843 recorded at Block #283652
  Tx Hash:	  91aed459a4cb1bbd500e1ffea62e84a0c8988971d251d307f7485d6cd57d79a8
  Total Amount Issued:	  [Issue No.1 at Block#283652] 10000000000
  Divisible:	  True
  Transfer:	  False
  Remark:	  Valid

Unless I'm missing something, counterpartyd is correct.

Actually, this is the correct:

Code:

$ counterpartyd.py asset MPTSTOCKF
Asset Name: MPTSTOCKF
Asset ID: 101249773934
Total Issued: 100.0
Divisible: True

The first issuance missed the 5 XCP fee.

Why an error happened when I check the asset MPTSTOCKF?

Code:

c:\counterpartyd_build>counterpartyd asset MPTSTOCKF

c:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 613, in <module>
    total = util.devise(db, total, args.asset, 'output')
  File "c:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\util.py", line 318, in devise
    if not issuances: raise exceptions.AssetError('No such asset: {}'.format(asset))
lib.exceptions.AssetError: No such asset: MPTSTOCKF

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: jimhsu on February 06, 2014, 07:48:32 AM

I see that you've implemented the order book -- props for an absolutely essential feature.

Can you sort the Sell orders in ascending order though (cheapest sell on top)? Optionally also put last trade/volume info on top.

A chart would also be nice, but I don't think we have enough volume yet.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: romerun on February 06, 2014, 08:20:36 AM

It looks quite confusing, order book should group orders with the same price in 1 line, then user may be able to click to see all orders at that price, the remain column is not necessary, just show the sum of available at each price on the top level, simply put making it looks like normal order book

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: gacrux on February 06, 2014, 11:44:01 AM

I've found another (major) difference between blockscan.com and counterpartyd:

http://blockscan.com/address.aspx?q=1JUXwDjh21yLkUhKNdggenexZK8XpeXTRx

Initially blockscan.com was showing a successful trade and a balance of 29 XCP in the above account.

Now it shows that the initial order TIMED OUT, and a balance of 0 XCP :-(

However:

~$ counterpartyd address 1JUXwDjh21yLkUhKNdggenexZK8XpeXTRx
Balances
+-------+--------+
| Asset | Amount |
+-------+--------+
| BTC | ?? |
| XCP | 29.0 |
+-------+--------+

My local counterpartyd still believes I have 29 XCP.

(cross-posted at: https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,2.0.html )

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 06, 2014, 11:51:13 AM

Quote from: gacrux on February 06, 2014, 11:44:01 AM

I am running the develop branch I am getting the following which matches with blockscan is showing

Balances
+-------+----------+
| Asset | Amount |
+-------+----------+
| BTC | 0.004257 |
+-------+----------+

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 06, 2014, 12:04:44 PM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 06, 2014, 02:44:08 AM

Overview
Dividends
Updates
Contacts
  Asset_ID:    2632494122289
  Issuer:    1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA
  Time Stamp:    2/1/2014 10:45:57 PM
  Transaction:    2843 recorded at Block #283652
  Tx Hash:    91aed459a4cb1bbd500e1ffea62e84a0c8988971d251d307f7485d6cd57d79a8
  Total Amount Issued:    [Issue No.1 at Block#283652] 10000000000
  Divisible:    True
  Transfer:    False
  Remark:    Valid

The difference between counterpartyd_build and blockscan.com:

counterpartyd_build:

Asset Name: MPTSTOCK
Asset ID: 101249773934
Total Issued: 200.0

blockscan.com:

Asset Info MPTSTOCKF
  Asset_ID:    2632494122289
  Issuer:    1FCkCQCnEtHQ3j7NqdkAnkqQUvqfti4XoA
  Time Stamp:    2/1/2014 10:45:57 PM
  Transaction:    2843 recorded at Block #283652
  Tx Hash:    91aed459a4cb1bbd500e1ffea62e84a0c8988971d251d307f7485d6cd57d79a8
  Total Amount Issued:    [Issue No.1 at Block#283652] 10000000000

My question is , which one is correct? I have marked the difference in red.

I also posted this at: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.2440

The AssetID is a bit confusing. Previous builds did not include the CHECKSUM character and the AssetID was calculated based on this..

But when the CheckSum character was added to the later releases the MPTSTOCK-became->MPTSTOCKF. And this (MPTSTOCKF) is what its officially referred to in this counterparty client when doing a "asset" command. However, the ASSETID is still calculated based on "MPTSTOCK" and not "MPTSTOCKF

I understand that the code is still alpha and changes like these are to be expected for the betterment of the protocol. However, I don't really have a way to know what gets broken on blockscan whenever these changes take place...

I believe I have already corrected this issue and asset page on blockscan should match what you see in the counterparty client. If I have missed out anything please let me know

I am going to take a step back from the making changes at blockscan and most likely wait till the changes stabilize a bit before trying to fix stuff after this

cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 06, 2014, 12:07:31 PM

Quote from: romerun on February 06, 2014, 08:20:36 AM

I've removed the original order volume and just have the actual remaining amount listed. I had it there earlier for "troubleshooting" just in case to catch any errors.

However, I am not too sure on what do you mean by grouping the price in the same line?? most exchanges (i.e like btc-e) have these listed on separate lines. This also gives you a feel of your place in the queue because the orders are on a separate lines. I think at this point a lot of people are also using the page to confirm if their order has actually gone through and breaking down the transactions allow this (vs grouping) them up

cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 06, 2014, 12:13:47 PM

Quote from: jimhsu on February 06, 2014, 07:48:32 AM

Can you sort the Sell orders in ascending order though (cheapest sell on top)?

Good catch. I've resorted it. does this look right now? http://blockscan.com/order_book.aspx

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: gacrux on February 06, 2014, 01:00:10 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on February 06, 2014, 11:51:13 AM

Quote from: gacrux on February 06, 2014, 11:44:01 AM

Yikes. That's not good!

Fundamentally, we don't want different versions of the client displaying different versions of the truth. This is essentially a consensus bug in the XCP protocol.

I'm running master, but I cloned yesterday. Just did a git pull and I see a handful of new commits... I wonder if one of those will change the way my counterpartyd behaves. Will have to wait for a chain rescan to find out.

This still doesn't explain why blockscan.com initially displayed the order as good (matched) and then, within the next few blocks, showed it as paid (and the 29 XCP in my account.) And now displays something else.

This is a bit of a bummer, because I initially tried purchasing 5 XCP as a test:
http://blockscan.com/address.aspx?q=1CJTDpHBvcQw4e7FCKzkT9j62PuXegWdYN

And when I saw the order completed and the 5 XCP in 1CJTDpHBvcQw4e7FCKzkT9j62PuXegWdYN, on blockscan.com, it gave me the confidence to buy another 8 XCP (for a total of 13 in 1CJTDpHBvcQw4e7FCKzkT9j62PuXegWdYN) and then the other 29. I see that the balance of 13 XCP in 1CJTDpHBvcQw4e7FCKzkT9j62PuXegWdYN has also suffered the same fate :-(

I attempted to transfer the 13 XCP to:
http://blockscan.com/address.aspx?q=1JDPNyMWKoQzq4sBhCwMdEiWeT2KWcHD21
and counterpartyd (cloned from master one day ago) showed the transfer to be successful - 13 XCP in 1JDPNyMWKoQzq4sBhCwMdEiWeT2KWcHD21, zero in 1CJTDpHBvcQw4e7FCKzkT9j62PuXegWdYN. But, again, blockscan.com shows 1JDPNyMWKoQzq4sBhCwMdEiWeT2KWcHD21 with a zero balance :(

Am I up the creek without a paddle here?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 06, 2014, 01:52:41 PM

Hi

I think it's best you bring this up in the main forums. What I can and will do is to try to ensure that the information displayed both in blockscan and counterparty is the same

Also take note that there are a lot of changed taking place during the early stages

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 06, 2014, 04:35:14 PM

Add a basic shareholders list (tab) based on address balances for a specific asset type under the individual asset type info

http://blockscan.com/asset.aspx

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Alias on February 07, 2014, 02:07:44 PM

Sorry to bring this up again, but if you could add the "Last DEX Matched Price" which you are already displaying on the home page to your JSON API list - http://blockscan.com/api.aspx - then we could get Counpterparty listed on coinmarketcap.com which would greatly increase it's exposure to the wider cryptocurrency community.

Please consider this.

Al

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Wit22 on February 08, 2014, 09:21:46 AM

Quote from: Alias on February 07, 2014, 02:07:44 PM

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: qtgwith on February 09, 2014, 07:53:56 AM

Quote from: kdrop22 on February 09, 2014, 06:53:16 AM

Quote from: qtgwith on February 09, 2014, 06:48:32 AM

Quote from: buybitcoinscanada on February 09, 2014, 04:08:39 AM

In regards to having xcp added to coinmarketcap. I PM'ed Gliss to ask about the criteria and this was his response:

Quote

Criteria for a coin to be added:
Must be a cryptocurrency
Must be traded on a public exchange that is older than 30 days and with an API available.
Must have a public URL that displays the total supply (total mined so far).

Request form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1IZf5cBivam_93zENT_arFFuvWDidHGjWxoTMVmFSoWg/viewform

Someone has already submitted XCP to be added, but hasn't included a public exchange yet. Do you know of any?

So looks like he'll gladly add it, but we need to be on an exchange and have an api available.

This would be great for exposure as most people in the crypto space use coinmarketcap.

GOOD

The exchange is the distributed exchange - order book on www.blockscan.com. We probably need to put in a request for blockscan to include an API.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=406408.0

Yes.Only need provide API now.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 09, 2014, 08:46:49 AM

Quote from: qtgwith on February 09, 2014, 07:53:56 AM

Quote from: kdrop22 on February 09, 2014, 06:53:16 AM

Quote from: qtgwith on February 09, 2014, 06:48:32 AM

Quote from: buybitcoinscanada on February 09, 2014, 04:08:39 AM

In regards to having xcp added to coinmarketcap. I PM'ed Gliss to ask about the criteria and this was his response:

Quote

So looks like he'll gladly add it, but we need to be on an exchange and have an api available.

This would be great for exposure as most people in the crypto space use coinmarketcap.

GOOD

The exchange is the distributed exchange - order book on www.blockscan.com. We probably need to put in a request for blockscan to include an API.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=406408.0

Yes.Only need provide API now.

I am somewhat hesitant to put up one as I am not entirely sure how the official client will calculate the last dex price. Whether this will be based on the BTCPAY transaction date, based on the order_match or order placed. I am currently using the BTCPay transaction date for last matched and paid.

I am not entirely sure if this will help the cause but here you go. New API added at http://blockscan.com/api.aspx . Please take note this is beta and there could be errors

For the total supply, at the moment the MAX amount of coins available is FIXED at the burn rate (2648755.9218 XCP) which is a fixed value. However, over time the number of coins will diminish as they are used for fees (i.e Asset Issuance fees at the moment). But the fees amount at moment this is negligible

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: peled1986 on February 09, 2014, 09:40:58 AM

I agree - using BTCPay transaction date for last matched and paid makes most sense.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: SyRenity on February 09, 2014, 12:36:37 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on February 09, 2014, 08:46:49 AM

BTCPAY is a good idea, as it actually shows the trade being closed (rather then just matched and held, or even placed). These (placed) can be done via high/low indicators.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: qtgwith on February 09, 2014, 02:00:08 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on February 09, 2014, 01:25:00 PM

Quote from: SyRenity on February 09, 2014, 12:31:11 PM

Quote from: buybitcoinscanada on February 09, 2014, 04:08:39 AM

So looks like he'll gladly add it, but we need to be on an exchange and have an api available.

This would be great for exposure as most people in the crypto space use coinmarketcap.

IMHO the built-in distributed exchange already counts as a public one - anyone can join it and trade.

Guess we only need the price ticker, which blockscan alreay does, and just needs to expose the API for it.

API has already been added. this is the json api for BTC/XCP http://blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=price&asset1=BTC&asset2=XCP

Title: Re: [BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 09, 2014, 08:53:45 PM

Quote from: qtgwith on February 09, 2014, 02:00:08 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on February 09, 2014, 01:25:00 PM

Quote from: SyRenity on February 09, 2014, 12:31:11 PM

Quote from: buybitcoinscanada on February 09, 2014, 04:08:39 AM

So looks like he'll gladly add it, but we need to be on an exchange and have an api available.

This would be great for exposure as most people in the crypto space use coinmarketcap.

API has already been added. this is the json api for BTC/XCP http://blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=price&asset1=BTC&asset2=XCP

I have also added an API for XCP money supply at http://blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=supply&asset=XCP

So now you should have sufficient information for a listing on coinmarketcap. This should be the first functional DEX .. ever..

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Matt Y on February 09, 2014, 09:10:42 PM

Awesome.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: xchrix on February 18, 2014, 02:13:11 PM

hello. i am new to XCP and try to find ways to show data on cryptocoincharts
i see a orderbook here http://blockscan.com/order_book.aspx
is it possible to provide a public API for this? and also for the last x matched prices

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Anotheranonlol on February 18, 2014, 02:19:36 PM

Quote from: xchrix on February 18, 2014, 02:13:11 PM

Hi,

You can find public JSON API below. These are current options available.

Quote

Get Address Balance for a specific Asset
http://blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=balance&address=16WhhnUUCZVvszFxsaCG3d6v77Qin1LErQ&asset=XCP
Get Address Balance for all available Assets
http://blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=balance&address=16WhhnUUCZVvszFxsaCG3d6v77Qin1LErQ
Get Last BTCPAY Dex Price for BTC/XCP
http://blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=price&asset1=BTC&asset2=XCP
Get XCP Money Supply
http://blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=supply&asset=XCP

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: xchrix on February 18, 2014, 02:29:19 PM

i know but thats not the right data to pull a orderbook

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: romerun on February 25, 2014, 12:27:37 AM

Is it a good idea to have some checkboxes for user to filter out orders that have insufficient fee or fee less than X% ? It's not much of a problem right now as the order book is shallow, but it's quite confusing for new users to see troll orders.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: prophetx on March 09, 2014, 08:59:13 PM

i recommend you add uservoice.com widget to this site

if you are concerned about xss then make your widget with a regular link to pop up the url in a new window

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: maxmint on March 14, 2014, 08:06:53 AM

The "Last DEX Btcpay Price" currently shows the value of an order that expired. Wouldn't it make more sense to only show completed orders here?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on March 14, 2014, 03:40:13 PM

Quote from: maxmint on March 14, 2014, 08:06:53 AM

The "Last DEX Btcpay Price" currently shows the value of an order that expired. Wouldn't it make more sense to only show completed orders here?

Its an expired order but with partial successful btcpay matches. Based on what I am seeing the calculation should be correct.

I am picking up the last valid BTCPay transaction where BTC/XCP is traded.

If it is otherwise, do let me know

cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: maxmint on March 14, 2014, 04:01:48 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on March 14, 2014, 03:40:13 PM

Quote from: maxmint on March 14, 2014, 08:06:53 AM

The "Last DEX Btcpay Price" currently shows the value of an order that expired. Wouldn't it make more sense to only show completed orders here?

Ah, got you – that makes sense. I did not realize that the order got partially filled.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on March 14, 2014, 04:27:24 PM

Quote from: maxmint on March 14, 2014, 04:01:48 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on March 14, 2014, 03:40:13 PM

Quote from: maxmint on March 14, 2014, 08:06:53 AM

The "Last DEX Btcpay Price" currently shows the value of an order that expired. Wouldn't it make more sense to only show completed orders here?

Ah, got you – that makes sense. I did not realize that the order got partially filled.

No problem.. These are my own calculations and there are multiple ways to interpret (calculate) this. Until an official api/calculation (which I am hoping will be available in counterwallet) is available I am sticking to this method of calculation

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: flatfly on March 16, 2014, 09:02:52 PM

Really useful site, nice job!

I want to report a possible bug in the API - unless I'm missing something.
It seems to return wrong balances (2x the actual balance, AFAICT)

Random example:

http://www.blockscan.com/address.aspx?q=1KjBcesaiiJyGpsG7RhtGChqNDaWhedfV6

(0.2 XCP)

vs

http://blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=balance&address=1KjBcesaiiJyGpsG7RhtGChqNDaWhedfV6&asset

(0.4 XCP)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on March 17, 2014, 06:34:45 AM

Quote from: flatfly on March 16, 2014, 09:02:52 PM

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have fixed the issue

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: xnova on April 07, 2014, 02:18:11 AM

mtbitcoin, can you add the ability to query a transaction by tx_hash?

Today I can do:
http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=6928

I'd like to be able to also do:
http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=8e52bf677080723cf3de5cfe926186497123e35fc7de82e9b61dfbb3970cef41

The problem with tx_index is that they can change between versions of counterparty (depending on the exact parsing rules). tx_hash does not have this side-effect, so it is the better absolute reference to use for transactions.

Once this is in blockscan, we can update our links to you guys in counterwallet (we link to you for transactions in address history, buy/sell, etc) :)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on April 14, 2014, 12:41:27 PM

Quote from: xnova on April 07, 2014, 02:18:11 AM

Sorry, missed this request.

All done. http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?txhash=8e52bf677080723cf3de5cfe926186497123e35fc7de82e9b61dfbb3970cef41

Please pass the parameter string txhash. Blockscan will expect an exact match for the tx_hash

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: supersuber on April 15, 2014, 05:26:29 AM

mtbitcoin, I want to report a bug:

http://www.blockscan.com/address.aspx?q=1QBYgXMTqEQNgoVotQN2iP1sPhHRPEoDHb
In this page, The system show "Issued 1000000000000000 BAAA"

But

http://www.blockscan.com/assetinfo.aspx?q=BAAA
In this page, The system show " Total Amount Issued:[Issue No.1 at Block#294884] 10000000"

1000000000000000 unequal to 10000000

Sorry! My English is poor!

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on April 15, 2014, 02:03:30 PM

Quote from: supersuber on April 15, 2014, 05:26:29 AM

Thank you for the reporting the issue. I have made the necessary adjustments to address the issue

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: BitcoinTangibleTrust on June 09, 2014, 10:21:12 PM

Hi mtbitcoin!

It looks like Blockscan is no longer parsing blocks as of today June 9, 2014 at 10:20PM GMT?

Are you okay to check and let me know if this is the case? I'm not sure, but I've had 2 folks ask me today.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on June 10, 2014, 06:16:57 PM

Quote from: BitcoinTangibleTrust on June 09, 2014, 10:21:12 PM

This has been resolved with the latest patches

Thanks

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: hozer on June 16, 2014, 08:57:42 PM

I am having signature problems with http://blockscan.com/assetInfo.aspx?q=SOYBEANS
Any idea how to start debugging this?

To go with http://www.gofundme.com/7ElementsSoy I want to sell 50,000 lbs of IA2053 food grade soybeans (tofu beans) for November/December delivery using counterparty, and let speculators take the risk on commodity price fluctuations.

But I have to be able to explain to people what that asset is, and the Counterwallet and blockscan seem like the most user-friendly interface I've seen so far. (for the record, it's also quite a bit better than the windows nonsense I have to use to hedge prices on the chicago board of trade)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on June 17, 2014, 11:53:21 AM

Quote from: hozer on June 16, 2014, 08:57:42 PM

Are you the asset owner "13JB28JQKtSp9J8uDtqyKEo8CR7mf6ykmn " and which client are you using for the signature signing? This has been tested with the QT official client

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: hozer on June 17, 2014, 01:41:39 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on June 17, 2014, 11:53:21 AM

Quote from: hozer on June 16, 2014, 08:57:42 PM

Are you the asset owner "13JB28JQKtSp9J8uDtqyKEo8CR7mf6ykmn " and which client are you using for the signature signing? This has been tested with the QT official client

This is from the counterwallet 'sign message' box:
message to sign (no CR/LF, just one line):

I am the owner of 13JB28JQKtSp9J8uDtqyKEo8CR7mf6ykmn

signed message, base64:
MEQCIA3P8BtUVXFpbY/TOb3lJAiWtRf7zGE1JccfqGoJIdC3AiBtI5UJXmrb7r85WKC7zp4z50wf1r8f+mET82CMS2oYbg==

signed message, hex:
304402200d49f7f467450b97ceea6ac91ddb1911ed18845790d9a31aa0c935b49b3a0c24022011f 14cf9704555706a742b20c79e982fe92830ec293a3cbcbdfee3d56230f3c7

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on June 17, 2014, 04:52:30 PM

Quote from: hozer on June 17, 2014, 01:41:39 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on June 17, 2014, 11:53:21 AM

Quote from: hozer on June 16, 2014, 08:57:42 PM

Are you the asset owner "13JB28JQKtSp9J8uDtqyKEo8CR7mf6ykmn " and which client are you using for the signature signing? This has been tested with the QT official client

I am unable to verify the signed message above in bitcoinQT. If anyone else here has a copy of bitcoinQT running can you please check to see if you can verify the signature above?

I have sent Xnova a PM

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on June 18, 2014, 02:00:24 AM

Quote from: hozer on June 17, 2014, 01:41:39 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on June 17, 2014, 11:53:21 AM

Quote from: hozer on June 16, 2014, 08:57:42 PM

Are you the asset owner "13JB28JQKtSp9J8uDtqyKEo8CR7mf6ykmn " and which client are you using for the signature signing? This has been tested with the QT official client

I have just verified that there is an issue with the counterparty wallet for message signing due to the bitcore js.

So until this is fixed you will need to sign outside using bitcoinqt or blockchain wallet

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: maxmint on July 30, 2014, 07:28:34 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on June 18, 2014, 02:00:24 AM

Quote from: hozer on June 17, 2014, 01:41:39 PM

I tried to sign a message with counterwallet, unfortunately it did not verify on blockscan. Just wanted to see if the above problem is still existent or if this has been already fixed.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on July 30, 2014, 10:48:33 AM

Quote from: maxmint on July 30, 2014, 07:28:34 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on June 18, 2014, 02:00:24 AM

Quote from: hozer on June 17, 2014, 01:41:39 PM

I tried to sign a message with counterwallet, unfortunately it did not verify on blockscan. Just wanted to see if the above problem is still existent or if this has been already fixed.

I do not believe the signature signing issue has been fixed at counterwallet.co. I tried dropping them (XCP developers) a PM and also posted on the forums but have not heard back from them.

EDIT: Yup, just checked on my own, the issue has Not been fixed yet. It would help you can also contact them directly to see if they will address this issue

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: wasthatawolf on August 13, 2014, 05:31:42 PM

any plans to add support for Dogeparty?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: MadGhost on August 13, 2014, 05:36:16 PM

Quote from: wasthatawolf on August 13, 2014, 05:31:42 PM

any plans to add support for Dogeparty?

seems like they are in the progress

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: LiteBit on August 17, 2014, 08:24:07 PM

Looks like support for Clearinghouse XCH has been added: http://xch.blockscan.com/

Couldn't find anything related to Dogeparty XDP yet.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on August 27, 2014, 04:59:02 PM

I like the new logo. Dogeparty support would be great.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on August 30, 2014, 02:45:06 AM

Quote from: weex on August 27, 2014, 04:59:02 PM

I like the new logo. Dogeparty support would be great.

Added at http://xdp.blockscan.com

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: SkullCoin on August 30, 2014, 03:39:31 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on August 30, 2014, 02:45:06 AM

Quote from: weex on August 27, 2014, 04:59:02 PM

I like the new logo. Dogeparty support would be great.

Added at http://xdp.blockscan.com

This is great news! "SkullCoin" is one step closer to switching to Dogeparty.

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e347/SkullTokens/1409200114_zps11c6a9a1.jpg

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on September 01, 2014, 04:34:51 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on August 30, 2014, 02:45:06 AM

Quote from: weex on August 27, 2014, 04:59:02 PM

I like the new logo. Dogeparty support would be great.

Added at http://xdp.blockscan.com

Awesome.

I was looking at some of the assets for which I have tokens. I can see which are locked and how many were created, but it's not so simple to find the most widely distributed tokens. The Gini coeffficient is something used for income distribution but I couldn't find the same thing for net worth which would be the closest macro measurement to what we'd see for tokens. Anyway, it would be interesting to know which tokens have been distributed evenly among the greatest number of addresses and maybe to see what the distribution is for all tokens with locked issuance across the entire XDP and XCP systems.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on September 01, 2014, 01:07:31 PM

Quote from: weex on September 01, 2014, 04:34:51 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on August 30, 2014, 02:45:06 AM

Quote from: weex on August 27, 2014, 04:59:02 PM

I like the new logo. Dogeparty support would be great.

Added at http://xdp.blockscan.com

I have not looked into the details for the various statistical models. But when I do get to it, I think this can be grouped under a "stats" section

Having said that any kind of stats related to dispersion can be easily manipulated and might not be accurate to determine whether an asset has a fair frequency distribution.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: blockchainexplorer on September 10, 2014, 12:04:23 PM

copied from: https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,599.msg3383/topicseen.html#msg3383

don't dividends get listed as transactions in the blockscan block explorer?

hi,
i've been exploring the blockchain using blockscan.com. I noticed that there seems to be a number of addresses that have several assets although they have only received one or two transactions. I assume that the other assets were delivered through the dividends mechanism. So now my question: why don't dividend appear as transactions? how can i find out how many dividends a have been received (and when) by a particular address? If not through dividends, how did those assets get there?

Exhibit A: http://www.counterpartyexplorer.com/address.aspx?q=14Tut9D2fQX7NjeMped28ysr851k4Tq8Xt

I would appreciate it if someone could explain this to me :-)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Muhammed Zakir on September 10, 2014, 01:05:38 PM

I have 741 SJCX but in explorer it is showing very low. Do you know why? My SJCX address : 12ZcxUGVoFNw6rhBQ7FfXAjLS1QWE7vJWA. BTW nice work. Good UI. :)

~~MZ~~

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on September 10, 2014, 02:12:50 PM

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on September 10, 2014, 01:05:38 PM

I have 741 SJCX but in explorer it is showing very low. Do you know why? My SJCX address : 12ZcxUGVoFNw6rhBQ7FfXAjLS1QWE7vJWA. BTW nice work. Good UI. :)

~~MZ~~

You had 741. But they were transferred out to the following http://www.blockscan.com/address.aspx?q=19VQq8uW9xYNgK5v9tUuQ9C28k1LpGX6Z4

Are you sure you they still show up in counterwallet ? Private keys secured?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on September 10, 2014, 02:17:58 PM

Quote from: blockchainexplorer on September 10, 2014, 12:04:23 PM

copied from: https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,599.msg3383/topicseen.html#msg3383

don't dividends get listed as transactions in the blockscan block explorer?

This is a question better posed for the official XCP forums :-)

However, I will try to answer. There are no individual transactions for the assets delivered via a dividend issuance. There is single one 'main' dividend transaction instruction with specific rules as to how to issue the dividends to the individual addresses . CounterpartyD then receives this instruction and performs the issuance behind the scenes. Each individual CounterpartyD client also does the same and you then have consensus by protocol

cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: wellerco on September 16, 2014, 04:12:19 PM

@mtbitcoin

Some folks at Storj are requesting a public way to show the current (last traded) DEX prices. I think it would be good for other tokens traded on the DEX as well.

Ideally we'd have a public API for this too.

Would you be willing to update this API call:

http://xcp.blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=price&asset1=BTC&asset2=XCP

to support all tokens. So this kind of a call would work as well:

http://xcp.blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=price&asset1=BTC&asset2=LTBCOIN

Thanks.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on September 16, 2014, 04:47:44 PM

Quote from: wellerco on September 16, 2014, 04:12:19 PM

Sure, that makes sense. And the API would be a good fit for that.

I will look into that as soon as I finish up some of the other changes that I have been working on recently

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: wellerco on September 17, 2014, 01:36:43 PM

It looks like CoinMarketCap just integrated the Counterparty DEX. I wonder how they did that.

http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/counterparty-dex/
http://coinmarketcap.com/assets/ltbcoin/#markets

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on September 19, 2014, 04:19:11 PM

Quote from: wellerco on September 17, 2014, 01:36:43 PM

It looks like CoinMarketCap just integrated the Counterparty DEX. I wonder how they did that.

http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/counterparty-dex/
http://coinmarketcap.com/assets/ltbcoin/#markets

If you run and have access to the CLI, you can do anything :D

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: prophetx on September 19, 2014, 05:07:46 PM

this address should show about 126 XCP, but the site is showing 0

1MJcVAJ5D2poJovBvdEZt3PpdcR8YY5vMQ

when I input it into counterwallet.co it shows up with the 126 XCP

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on September 19, 2014, 07:29:08 PM

Quote from: prophetx on September 19, 2014, 05:07:46 PM

this address should show about 126 XCP, but the site is showing 0

1MJcVAJ5D2poJovBvdEZt3PpdcR8YY5vMQ

when I input it into counterwallet.co it shows up with the 126 XCP

The daemon went down so we were backed up a bit. After restarting it we're up to date

You can check the main page to see which are the last block processed, if its not up to date it most likely means the daemon is down

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: prophetx on September 19, 2014, 07:59:59 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on September 19, 2014, 07:29:08 PM

Quote from: prophetx on September 19, 2014, 05:07:46 PM

this address should show about 126 XCP, but the site is showing 0

1MJcVAJ5D2poJovBvdEZt3PpdcR8YY5vMQ

when I input it into counterwallet.co it shows up with the 126 XCP

i see it now, thanks

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on September 21, 2014, 04:06:09 PM

Quote from: wellerco on September 16, 2014, 04:12:19 PM

Ok. Completed as per above. You can now get the both the latest DEX prices for a BTCPAY & NonBTCPay asset pairs.

The code for the NonBTCPay assets pair is still new so it's under testing. Do let me know if you see anything out of place

ex:

http://xcp.blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=price&asset1=BTC&asset2=SJCX

http://xcp.blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=price&asset1=SJCX&asset2=XCP
http://xcp.blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=price&asset1=XCP&asset2=SJCX

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: wellerco on September 24, 2014, 09:48:09 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on September 21, 2014, 04:06:09 PM

Great. Thanks.

I noticed you added email notifications too. ;)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on September 25, 2014, 07:11:22 AM

Quote from: wellerco on September 24, 2014, 09:48:09 PM

Great. Thanks.

I noticed you added email notifications too. ;)

I like what you did with CoinMachine.co. Straight forward and clean design. Tried the service and the notifications were prompt and precise

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: CounterpartyRippler on October 04, 2014, 11:59:11 AM

Can you add the field "match_expire_index" from https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterpartyd/blob/master/lib/blocks.py#L318 to table on http://www.blockscan.com/order_match.aspx?

Because it's not easy to figure out when one's order was matched.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on October 04, 2014, 01:18:14 PM

Quote from: CounterpartyRippler on October 04, 2014, 11:59:11 AM

Is the match_expire_index used to used to designate the block index when the order was matched?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: PhantomPhreak on October 04, 2014, 02:30:08 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on October 04, 2014, 01:18:14 PM

Quote from: CounterpartyRippler on October 04, 2014, 11:59:11 AM

Is the match_expire_index used to used to designate the block index when the order was matched?

It's used to designate the block at which an order match will expire.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on October 04, 2014, 02:59:36 PM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on October 04, 2014, 02:30:08 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on October 04, 2014, 01:18:14 PM

Quote from: CounterpartyRippler on October 04, 2014, 11:59:11 AM

Is the match_expire_index used to used to designate the block index when the order was matched?

It's used to designate the block at which an order match will expire.

That was what I thought so too... Having said that, how would suggest that we determine the block that an order matches?

Can this be done by looking at the larger value of either the tx0_index or tx1_index ?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: PhantomPhreak on October 04, 2014, 04:12:48 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on October 04, 2014, 02:59:36 PM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on October 04, 2014, 02:30:08 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on October 04, 2014, 01:18:14 PM

Quote from: CounterpartyRippler on October 04, 2014, 11:59:11 AM

Is the match_expire_index used to used to designate the block index when the order was matched?

It's used to designate the block at which an order match will expire.

The order matches table has a column block_index. (Because of re-matches, the larger tx_index value isn't reliable.)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on October 04, 2014, 05:43:51 PM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on October 04, 2014, 04:12:48 PM

The order matches table has a column block_index. (Because of re-matches, the larger tx_index value isn't reliable.)

I have updated both the order_matches and orderinfo(matches) with the block number

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on October 09, 2014, 02:24:11 AM

I've started looking at the order matches screen and have a request. Would it be possible to have that sorted by price or pair then price? Otherwise, seeing more results per page would help with the usability.

Also, I've not looked at counterpartyd but are zero-confirmation orders something you could show? (maybe dimmed to show they aren't active yet)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on October 09, 2014, 07:43:01 AM

Quote from: weex on October 09, 2014, 02:24:11 AM

To sort by price, we have to first sort by pair. I will look into increasing the page results first.

Are you looking at the order_matches in order to determine if your order has matched? If yes, then the recommended way is to look up your order first and click on the view button. This will show you your order details and related order_matches and btcpays (if any) under separate tabs

At the moment, the orders need at least 1 confirmation to make it into the counterpartyd. For 0 confirmation orders (and transctions) you can view the mempool table available under http://blockscan.com/pending. It is in RAW json data, but you should still be able to see if your transaction made it in.

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on October 09, 2014, 08:26:08 AM

Actually my purpose is to see order matches that were awaiting BTCpay to see if I want to try and fill one of them. I don't get why so many matches expire but some of them are at low/high prices which makes them interesting.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on October 09, 2014, 12:18:38 PM

Quote from: weex on October 09, 2014, 08:26:08 AM

Actually my purpose is to see order matches that were awaiting bbc pay to see if I want to try and fill one of them. I don't get why so many matches expire but some of them are at low/high prices which makes them interesting.

Most of the expirations are due to the required/provided fee mismatches in addition to incomplete BTCPays

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on October 09, 2014, 09:43:33 PM

So, not to get too off-topic in your thread but, doesn't Counterwallet take care of the required/provided fee situation i.e are people tweaking things without knowing the impact or... are they trying to minimize fees and the wallet can't handle all of those cases?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on October 10, 2014, 06:28:18 PM

Quote from: weex on October 09, 2014, 02:24:11 AM

Also, I've not looked at counterpartyd but are zero-confirmation orders something you could show? (maybe dimmed to show they aren't active yet)

I've just added the ability to view pending zero confirmation sends, orders, cancels and issuances (dimmed) when looking at the address transaction page

To test this out either do a test transaction or pull up one of the source/destination addresses at http://blockscan.com/pending. And then lookup the address transactions at the search box

This is still work in progress though and might need some fine tuning.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on October 10, 2014, 08:34:07 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on October 10, 2014, 06:28:18 PM

Quote from: weex on October 09, 2014, 02:24:11 AM

Also, I've not looked at counterpartyd but are zero-confirmation orders something you could show? (maybe dimmed to show they aren't active yet)

Very cool. That should be helpful in seeing how fast things are happening on the network level.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Matt Y on November 11, 2014, 03:47:02 PM

Hi,

No "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" header is present on the requested resource. That's the error message I get when trying to access the data with Javascript. Also, it seems the specific asset balance does not work: http://xcp.blockscan.com/api2.aspx?module=address&action=balance&btc_address=16WhhnUUCZVvszFxsaCG3d6v77Qin1LErQ&asset=XCP

Thanks.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on November 11, 2014, 05:58:16 PM

Quote from: Matt Y on November 11, 2014, 03:47:02 PM

I have fixed the asset balance issue. Will look into the other (CORS) issue.

Can you send me a copy of the javascript text snippet or better still jsfiddle link so that I do not have to recreate a script?

Edit: Can you give your javascript another try and let me know if you are still running into issues?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Matt Y on November 11, 2014, 06:26:25 PM

Works now, thanks!

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: CounterpartyRippler on November 12, 2014, 04:30:22 AM

Quote from: weex on October 09, 2014, 09:43:33 PM

I think most people aren't tweaking things because they don't know what they mean (but it could be checked of course, by looking at BTC Sell orders, especially expired).

Matches aren't handled in the wallet but below in counterpartyd (which is why counterpartyd can still use BTC Sell although it was recently removed from Counterwallet).

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: CounterpartyRippler on November 12, 2014, 04:49:57 AM

@mtbitcoin, on home page the exchange rate of XCP is based on the last BTC Sell (for XCP) trade executed on the DEx, which was few days back.
Maybe you should the rate from Coinmarketcap or weighted average from main exchanges?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on November 12, 2014, 08:47:17 AM

Quote from: CounterpartyRippler on November 12, 2014, 04:49:57 AM

Does Coinmarketcap have an API for pulling prices?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on November 12, 2014, 04:42:05 PM

Most of the volume is on Bter so I would prefer it be based on the last trade for Bter btcxcp and bitstamp btcusd. If you want to future proof it a bit you could go volume weighted for the top 3-4 exchanges on each pair.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on November 12, 2014, 06:23:17 PM

Quote from: weex on November 12, 2014, 04:42:05 PM

Yeah, I was thinking of fixing it to BTER too. The prices across centralized exchanges normally normalizes due to arbitrage, so in using the prices on either one of the exchanges should be good enough

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on November 12, 2014, 06:36:46 PM

Cool. By the way, I hope you're ready to syntax-highlight some Serpent contracts! ;D

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on November 12, 2014, 07:06:16 PM

Quote from: weex on November 12, 2014, 06:36:46 PM

Cool. By the way, I hope you're ready to syntax-highlight some Serpent contracts! ;D

Lol... it looks like its time to hit the "code" again. Are there any technical write-ups/wiki entries for the latest "eth" style contracts?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on November 12, 2014, 07:06:42 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on November 12, 2014, 06:23:17 PM

Quote from: weex on November 12, 2014, 04:42:05 PM

ok. done. linked to BTER prices for now

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on November 13, 2014, 05:53:46 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on November 12, 2014, 07:06:16 PM

Quote from: weex on November 12, 2014, 06:36:46 PM

Cool. By the way, I hope you're ready to syntax-highlight some Serpent contracts! ;D

Lol... it looks like its time to hit the "code" again. Are there any technical write-ups/wiki entries for the latest "eth" style contracts?

I think it's pretty similar to python. Vbuterin pointed out a bunch of examples at https://github.com/ethereum/serpent/tree/poc7/examples

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on November 18, 2014, 08:21:35 AM

Quote from: Yingsena on November 18, 2014, 06:23:09 AM

Hi

I don't know if this is the correct place to report errors or not but I've noticed an error is returned when searching on an asset 'string' of characters in xch.blockscan explorer this only happens with xch.blockscan Counterparty and Dogeparty blockscan explorers appear to handle asset strings correctly with dogeparty sending the results to what looks like there own block explorer results page.

error msg

Opps Unrecognized search pattern 'string'

Fixed. Thank you

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Equality 7-2521 on November 26, 2014, 05:22:49 PM

Hey Mt.Bitcoin,

How well are you prepared for a huge amount of traffic directed towards Blockscan.com? I am aware of a number of projects (one in particular, once the free Asset Issuance rolls out) that will use online Counterparty Block Explorers (currently only Blockscan) heavily. Is there any way to pay for increased use of your API? Could you add more functionality to your API?

Are you familiar with services like https://block.io/ and https://chain.com/? Have you thought about positioning yourself to serve the corresponding Counterparty Market? Particularly focusing on "Enterprise" solutions? Perhaps you could be a go to service that the impending Counterparty Foundation recommends?

How many nodes are you connected to at any one time? I.e. are you well protected from a sybil attack?

Regards,
E72521

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on November 26, 2014, 06:53:49 PM

Quote from: Equality 7-2521 on November 26, 2014, 05:22:49 PM

The Blockscan API is currently offered as a free community service and can be throttled/blocked if excessive queries are performed. Can you elaborate (or PM me) on what kind of additional functionality/APIs are you looking for and at what rates ?

As for the "Enterprise" services I do not think the market is really that matured/big enough to warrant a separate service that specifically caters for this at the moment. However, things can change overnight in the bitcoin world, and should there be a need we can definitely take that route.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Equality 7-2521 on November 27, 2014, 12:03:03 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on November 26, 2014, 06:53:49 PM

Quote from: Equality 7-2521 on November 26, 2014, 05:22:49 PM

I cannot divulge any more project specific information at this time. However, I can say that this is very much a chicken and egg scenario where people are coming up with great applications to utilize assets and the decentralized exchange but they lack the coding chops and infrastructure to cope with the backend. This is blatantly obvious over at the LTB forums, for example.

It might help to include some common Bitcoin API calls with your Blockscan API.

The query/polling rates could be pretty high if certain apps are looking for unconfirmed transactions as they come in.

If I were you, I would anticipate the coming demand and set up a tidy revenue stream.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on November 27, 2014, 03:33:32 AM

Quote from: Equality 7-2521 on November 27, 2014, 12:03:03 AM

The reason I did not include the common Bitcoin API calls are because these are already available externally from services like chain.com, blockchain.info, etc. Or are you referring to something else?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Equality 7-2521 on November 27, 2014, 03:34:13 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on November 27, 2014, 03:33:32 AM

Quote from: Equality 7-2521 on November 27, 2014, 12:03:03 AM

No, that is what I am referring to. It would be nice to have some of the useful Counterparty API calls and Bitcoin API calls all in one place supplied and maintained by one service provider.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on November 29, 2014, 04:47:13 PM

Hi

Just released : The new Blockscan Counterparty LogSpotter (http://blockscan.com/logspot) (Realtime transaction log entries pushed to your browser)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: adamgud on December 10, 2014, 10:47:19 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on November 29, 2014, 04:47:13 PM

Hi

Just released : The new Blockscan Counterparty LogSpotter (http://blockscan.com/logspot) (Realtime transaction log entries pushed to your browser)

Hello!
I sent XCP.
Transaction http://blockscan.com/address/12MQWZ6QK3ARUiPaeeZ3VppDbKJACTZyMq
https://blockchain.info/tx/b3dccb155f36ff6d917fde5990370d0cadef37f5c00f0c47633f1de71fe3e46b

Coins not received. What's this? What to do?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on December 10, 2014, 11:21:58 AM

Quote from: adamgud on December 10, 2014, 10:47:19 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on November 29, 2014, 04:47:13 PM

Hi

Just released : The new Blockscan Counterparty LogSpotter (http://blockscan.com/logspot) (Realtime transaction log entries pushed to your browser)

Is this a withdrawal from poloniex? If yes, then you need to contact them or your sender for further information

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: romerun on December 11, 2014, 09:03:34 AM

Quote from: adamgud on December 10, 2014, 10:47:19 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on November 29, 2014, 04:47:13 PM

Hi

Just released : The new Blockscan Counterparty LogSpotter (http://blockscan.com/logspot) (Realtime transaction log entries pushed to your browser)

every time I deposit to poloniex it either takes about 24 hrs to credit my acc, or I have to create a support ticket to bug for it, such poor form

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on December 11, 2014, 09:42:46 AM

Quote from: romerun on December 11, 2014, 09:03:34 AM

Quote from: adamgud on December 10, 2014, 10:47:19 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on November 29, 2014, 04:47:13 PM

Hi

Just released : The new Blockscan Counterparty LogSpotter (http://blockscan.com/logspot) (Realtime transaction log entries pushed to your browser)

every time I deposit to poloniex it either takes about 24 hrs to credit my acc, or I have to create a support ticket to bug for it, such poor form

I think the recent withdrawal delays had something to do with the latest upgrades/patches.. However, its best to contact the sender for further clarifcation

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: CounterpartyRippler on December 31, 2014, 12:22:58 PM

Hi,

1. I got this while trying to submit Contact Form on blockscan.com:

500 - Internal server error.
There is a problem with the resource you are looking for, and it cannot be displayed.

I retried - same issue.

2. About a week ago I had a problem with password recovery on blockscan.com. I think submitted feedback about that as well, but I'll try again. IIRC there's a problem with password reset whereby the site asks for one's email address but doesn't accept it with a message that the username should be provided instead, or something like that.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on December 31, 2014, 01:29:46 PM

Quote from: CounterpartyRippler on December 31, 2014, 12:22:58 PM

Hmmphh.. I just tried the feedback form and did not run into any issues. And the password reset appears to be working correctly...

In any case, if you are still running into issues just drop me an email directly instead with a screen capture of the error message and I will look into this.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 01, 2015, 04:41:45 AM

Beta Testnet Counterparty explorer is now available at http://testnet.blockscan.com

Thanks

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: PhantomPhreak on January 01, 2015, 04:12:23 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 01, 2015, 04:41:45 AM

Beta Testnet Counterparty explorer is now available at http://testnet.blockscan.com

Thanks

Very cool! +1

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: David-M on January 04, 2015, 02:55:31 PM

On the page:
https://blockscan.com/address/12sAb5k1dKb6b2RFjZFX4xo3tEpCjrUy6t
yesterday it wasn't showing unconfirmed, today it is.
Have you made an update? Will it stay like this?

I need to use the page with unconfirms to update a voting system I'm working on.

Thanks,

David

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 04, 2015, 03:23:05 PM

Quote from: David-M on January 04, 2015, 02:55:31 PM

https://blockscan.com/pending shows transactions in the counterparty mempool. From what I observed it could take either a few seconds to a few minutes to appear (even though they are already present in bitcoind getrawtransactions). The delay has something to do with the way counterpartyd is processing them (prior to version .9.4.1 this was not an issue)

While they do not seem be affecting the counterparty transactions this unfortunately introduces some delay when viewing the transactions... I am currently working on some new code to see if this can be improved

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 05, 2015, 07:06:45 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 04, 2015, 03:23:05 PM

Quote from: David-M on January 04, 2015, 02:55:31 PM

I have made some code changes to address the delay issue in the address page. And have also modified the address balance API to show an unconfirmed balance. Let me know if this helps or if you are still running into issues

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: ninjaboon on January 05, 2015, 02:34:13 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 01, 2015, 04:41:45 AM

Beta Testnet Counterparty explorer is now available at http://testnet.blockscan.com

Thanks

Looks great. I use blockscan all the time. Thanks for the cool site.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: David-M on January 06, 2015, 02:02:52 AM

yep, seeing unconfirms in the main https://blockscan.com/address/12sAb5k1dKb6b2RFjZFX4xo3tEpCjrUy6t
Thanks!

Quote

And have also modified the address balance API to show an unconfirmed balance.

am i looking at the wrong API?

If theres no balance, but an unconfirmed, getting an error:
http://api.blockscan.com/api2?module=address&action=balance&btc_address=address

{
"status": "error",
"message": "no matching asset found",
"data": []
}

Or if theres a confirmed balance, the unconfirms aren't also listed.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 06, 2015, 04:20:26 AM

Quote from: David-M on January 06, 2015, 02:02:52 AM

yep, seeing unconfirms in the main https://blockscan.com/address/12sAb5k1dKb6b2RFjZFX4xo3tEpCjrUy6t
Thanks!

Quote

And have also modified the address balance API to show an unconfirmed balance.

Use this one. Replace both address and asset with the one you are tracking.

http://api.blockscan.com/api2?module=address&action=balance&btc_address=16WhhnUUCZVvszFxsaCG3d6v77Qin1LErQ&asset=COINREPUBLIC

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 06, 2015, 07:37:02 AM

Quote from: David-M on January 06, 2015, 02:02:52 AM

Or if theres a confirmed balance, the unconfirms aren't also listed.

They should list the unconfirmed balances regardless of whether there are confirmed balances in the latest update. However, you have to use the "Get Address Balance for a specific Asset" API

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 18, 2015, 01:31:57 PM

Notice:

Minor changes to the API url (speed improvement changes implemented)

Please call the API as specified in http://blockscan.com/api

** there is no file extension in API URL (so do not include the .aspx)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 25, 2015, 10:21:32 AM

Hi

I've just released a tool to allow you to check/retrieve/generate your counterwallet bitcoin addresses/keys using your counterwallet 12 word passphrase. The script runs client side only (in your browser using javascript). No keys, passphrases are transmitted server side. For additional security the script can also be run while in offline/disconnected mode

The tool can be accessed at https://blockscan.com/tool_generatekey. Because it is built purely with javascript and html, all of the code is viewable online.

Feedback welcomed

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: ninjaboon on January 25, 2015, 10:55:13 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 25, 2015, 10:21:32 AM

Hi

I've just released a tool to allow you to check/retrieve/generate your counterwallet bitcoin addresses/keys using your counterwallet 12 word passphrase. The script runs client side only (in your browser using javascript). No keys, passphrases are transmitted server side. For additional security the script can also be run while in offline/disconnected mode

The tool can be accessed at https://blockscan.com/tool_generatekey.html. Because it is built purely with javascript and html, all of the code is viewable online.

Feedback welcomed

great tool , thanks for this.
https://blockscan.com/tool_generatekey.html

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on January 26, 2015, 08:37:29 AM

Being familiar with bitaddress.org, I think they set a good standard for code auditability by having that website in a github repo, providing hashes, etc. So I would suggest taking it in that direction to help people trust it on an ongoing basis.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 26, 2015, 09:37:11 AM

Quote from: weex on January 26, 2015, 08:37:29 AM

I agree, the eventual plan is to Github the generator (https://github.com/blockscan/cw_address_key_generator). But the code need some major cleaning up first ....

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Muhammed Zakir on January 26, 2015, 10:20:51 AM

Can this tool supports all assets and also can we sign TX with this tool like brainwallet?

~~MZ~~

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 26, 2015, 12:07:29 PM

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on January 26, 2015, 10:20:51 AM

Can this tool supports all assets and also can we sign TX with this tool like brainwallet?

~~MZ~~

Signing is not an issue. But there are no JavaScript client libraries to build the CP transactions client side, that I am aware off. You will need to run and connect to backend daemon like counterblockd

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on January 27, 2015, 01:40:10 PM

Quote from: weex on January 26, 2015, 08:37:29 AM

The github source is now available at https://github.com/blockscan/cw_address_key_generator

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on February 03, 2015, 04:13:11 AM

I'm no longer seeing lists of transactions for a specific address. For example http://blockscan.com/address/1Po1oXMCWobE6kxWr8rJEP1SRq71JSD3t4 doesn't show any transactions or formatting below the "First" "Prev" "Page 1 of XXXX" buttons on the right.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 03, 2015, 05:53:09 AM

Quote from: weex on February 03, 2015, 04:13:11 AM

There were some code changes made to the address page to reduce the number of postbacks required. I've tested this in both IE, Chrome and Safari. May I know what browser are you running ?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 03, 2015, 05:55:21 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on February 03, 2015, 05:53:09 AM

Quote from: weex on February 03, 2015, 04:13:11 AM

There were some code changes made to the address page to reduce the number of postbacks required. I've tested this in both IE, Chrome and Safari. May I know what browser are you running ?

Firefox? I see the issue and am looking into it. It appears firefox interprets the frame tags differently

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 03, 2015, 06:04:56 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on February 03, 2015, 05:55:21 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on February 03, 2015, 05:53:09 AM

Quote from: weex on February 03, 2015, 04:13:11 AM

There were some code changes made to the address page to reduce the number of postbacks required. I've tested this in both IE, Chrome and Safari. May I know what browser are you running ?

Firefox? I see the issue and am looking into it. It appears firefox interprets the frame tags differently

Ok. It should be fixed now. Let me know if you are still running into issues

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on February 13, 2015, 12:35:15 AM

Inspired by our convo at the XCP forums, I think it would be good for your asset issuances detail page to show the description and any other data pertinent to an issuance. For example, I can't see the description given when FLDC was issued in this transaction: http://blockscan.com/txInfo/429963

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 13, 2015, 03:59:35 AM

Quote from: weex on February 13, 2015, 12:35:15 AM

I've updated the issuance page to show the description with the initial asset issuance and also the associated address responsible for additional issuance. If there is any other "pertinent" data that is left out let me know. Given that the issuance page is basically a high level overview, certain information such as fees, etc have been left out

http://blockscan.com/assetInfo/FLDC#issuance

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on February 13, 2015, 05:53:37 AM

Very cool. That simplifies things for me and reduces the number of Bitcoin transactions by one for the process as well!

In general, I think each type of transaction should display everything a user might want to know about it. For an issuance, seeing everyting a user might set for a new asset in Counterwallet would be cool. Obviously, seeing all of that info can be daunting for new users so there is something be said for keeping it simple (or making an advanced view link).

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on February 22, 2015, 04:49:41 AM

A feature request: Provide a way to search description text. I'd like to be able to provide a link that shows any and all assets that have a certain hash in their description ordered by block number. The reason is that I've put out a set of artworks that each come with a Counterparty token and the way the artwork is connected with the token is by putting a hash of an image of the artwork in the description field of the token when it's first issued.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 22, 2015, 01:25:38 PM

Quote from: weex on February 22, 2015, 04:49:41 AM

An advanced asset search is now available at http://blockscan.com/search?mod=asset

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: weex on February 22, 2015, 08:21:20 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on February 22, 2015, 01:25:38 PM

Quote from: weex on February 22, 2015, 04:49:41 AM

An advanced asset search is now available at http://blockscan/search?mod=asset

Works great. I'm going to have to write a general asset + proof of existence type article based on this.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 23, 2015, 12:05:25 PM

Quote from: weex on February 22, 2015, 08:21:20 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on February 22, 2015, 01:25:38 PM

Quote from: weex on February 22, 2015, 04:49:41 AM

An advanced asset search is now available at http://blockscan.com/search?mod=asset

Works great. I'm going to have to write a general asset + proof of existence type article based on this.

Great! Let me know when your article is complete and I will put a link in the "what's new" section of Blockscan's main page to your article.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on February 23, 2015, 03:02:45 PM

Just a short update...

The Blockchain Voting (Powered by Counterparty) vote Scoreboard service is now online at https://www.blockscan.com/votes

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on March 08, 2015, 03:12:16 PM

Updated the AssetInfo sections to include the Gini Coefficient..

To whoever, who provided this suggestion last year, thanks!

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Chaykaa on March 12, 2015, 08:16:41 AM

The GINI index - very interesting. I hope you will introduce more metrics as well. Makes it fun to compare assets.

For GINI I wonder if an adjusted calculation would add some value. For example, some assets have one owner/distribution address which holds almost all tokens. Look at FLDC. It has GINI > 99%. It's because the owner holds token that are yet not distributed.

Another thing is addresses with dust amounts. GINI is meant for a population (a finite amount of people). Bitcoin is made of an infinite amount of addresses and over time there will be lots of addresses with dust, which makes GINI look too high.

Suggested adjustment: 1) Do not include the one address with the largest holding. 2) Sort addresses and include only those that accumulated own 95% of all assets.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on March 12, 2015, 08:55:45 AM

Quote from: Chaykaa on March 12, 2015, 08:16:41 AM

I agree. I will probably produce a filter for choosing a minimum threshold of number of addresses.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on March 24, 2015, 03:46:50 PM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on January 25, 2015, 10:21:32 AM

Updated to allow offline message signing from any of your counterwallet addresses

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: schnuber on August 23, 2015, 10:52:47 PM

On your homepage in the API section it reads:
"The following are examples of the available API calls:"
So are these API calls listed there only a subset of available calls. Where is the documentation of the complete set of available calls?

Greets

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on August 24, 2015, 04:48:20 AM

All the available (from Blockscan) API calls are as listed on the site

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on September 07, 2015, 08:39:12 AM

Quote from: Yingsena on September 07, 2015, 02:49:07 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin on August 30, 2014, 02:45:06 AM

Quote from: weex on August 27, 2014, 04:59:02 PM

I like the new logo. Dogeparty support would be great.

Added at http://xdp.blockscan.com

What happened to xdp and xch on blockscan ?

For dogeparty you can use https://dogepartychain.io/ as a substitute. XCH support was discontinued a few months back due to a low visitor rate (from a Blockexplorer viewpoint)

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: flayway on October 14, 2015, 02:46:29 AM

Are there possible make option to search all transactions between two address?

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: mtbitcoin on October 14, 2015, 03:01:55 PM

Quote from: flayway on October 14, 2015, 02:46:29 AM

Are there possible make option to search all transactions between two address?

If you are referring to just 2 specific addresses, then no. At least not out of the box. Having said that though you could use the APIs and generate a list of transactions for each address, and then programmatically just extract those matching your search criteria.

Cheers

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Pegrala on November 30, 2015, 12:51:10 PM

Blockscan - really useful. I use it a lot. Thanks for hosting this great service :)

Something that would be interesting to see on the frontpage, next to XCP supply, # of assets, price, etc, would be number of addresses with Counterparty assets. I know you have this in a graph. Would just be nice to see the number every time I check Blockscan. The GINI can be replaced IMO.

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: wings.ai on September 25, 2016, 05:45:05 AM

enhanced asset info is not displaying correctly

http://blockscan.com/assetInfo/SILKROADPEPE for example

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: Hypocritus on May 08, 2017, 12:50:54 AM

[BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer has been discontinued by the developer as of April 11, 2017

https://www.blockscan.com/

Title: Re: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer
Post by: OllieBlockchain on April 13, 2022, 05:36:46 AM

I was wondering what happened to blockscan Counterparty block explorer ? Will it ever come back online