|
Title: delete Post by: BitcoinEXpress on September 04, 2011, 08:10:43 PM delete
Title: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on September 04, 2011, 08:13:13 PM +1. Exactly what I said in the other thread.
Title: Re: delete Post by: Oldminer on September 04, 2011, 08:16:17 PM What we going to call it? Spamcoin ???
Title: Re: delete Post by: FlipPro on September 04, 2011, 08:18:06 PM THE PROTECTIONS THAT WERE PUT IN PLACE WERE SO THAT POOLS COULD NOT CHANGE THE CODE, AND START MALICIOUS ATTACKS, LIKE THE ONE WE JUST RECEIVED THE OTHER DAY FROM ARTFROZ. WE DID NOT "LOCK" THE CODE UP, OR HIDE IT AWAY IN SOME SECRET SHELF. THE CODE IS STILL VERY MUCH OPEN SOURCE, AND ANYONE CAN STILL WRITE/DELETE FROM IT.
Title: Re: delete Post by: Bobnova on September 04, 2011, 08:20:32 PM All caps makes anything more believable!
Title: Re: delete Post by: ElectricMucus on September 04, 2011, 08:21:24 PM sure why not, in that case it might be wise to set the initial difficulty at something like 5000
Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on September 04, 2011, 08:30:37 PM The idea of keeping SC alive seemed silly.
New fork? Sure, but lettin CH profit from his own screwups seems silly. Although if SC does die, I feel bad for those who lost a -lot-... but that's the risk I guess. But if it's gonna continue, I'd start it over again with a new name. The SC 'brand' has been tooooo hurt by this, imo. Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on September 04, 2011, 08:37:10 PM The idea of keeping SC alive seemed silly. New fork? Sure, but lettin CH profit from his own screwups seems silly. Although if SC does die, I feel bad for those who lost a -lot-... but that's the risk I guess. But if it's gonna continue, I'd start it over again with a new name. The SC 'brand' has been tooooo hurt by this, imo. CH would not profit from a new fork. Quite the opposite. Oh you misunderstood me. I'm agreeing with a new *fork*, one where any SC's held by CH (or anyone else for that matter) would be invalid. Title: Re: delete Post by: Bobnova on September 04, 2011, 08:37:41 PM I still like the most common typo: SoldCoin.
Or maybe BoughtCoin? RealValueReallyISwearItWontCollapseCoin? ToHellWithCoinHunterCoin? I mean honestly, what are the odds of an alternate currency actually succeeding alongside of or replacing bitcoin? Seem pretty minimal to me, it's the Get Rich Quick effect that I think most (all?) are after. Bitcoin is the Microsoft, all the other coins are at best linux distros. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lumpy on September 04, 2011, 08:38:47 PM Ugh, please don't compare Bitcoin to Microsoft. ;)
Title: Re: delete Post by: Bobnova on September 04, 2011, 08:39:40 PM Both are 800lb gorillas with a sea of spidermonkeys swarming around them. Seems about right to me :D
Title: Re: delete Post by: sd on September 04, 2011, 08:39:56 PM The idea of keeping SC alive seemed silly. New fork? Sure, but lettin CH profit from his own screwups seems silly. Although if SC does die, I feel bad for those who lost a -lot-... but that's the risk I guess. But if it's gonna continue, I'd start it over again with a new name. The SC 'brand' has been tooooo hurt by this, imo. Can't we flatten the blockchain removing whatever was mined before SolidCoin went public? It should be possible to pick out transactions and merge them into a new blockchain ignoring everything before some given block number. It's not totally fair as the pre-mined coins may have moved about a bit. Bounty payments may disappear and it may be a lot of work. It would be a lot fairer than started a whole new blockchain though. Title: Re: delete Post by: The Electric Monk on September 04, 2011, 08:40:10 PM Call them Space Credits.
Title: Re: delete Post by: ElectricMucus on September 04, 2011, 08:42:41 PM Admit it the only reason to be interested in preserving solidcoin is being entertained by the drama.
I know I am. :P Has been nothing but drama lately, with everything surrounding bitcoin the whole internet laughs at it. Title: Re: delete Post by: The Electric Monk on September 04, 2011, 08:43:43 PM Admit it the only reason to be interested in preserving solidcoin is being entertained by the drama. I know I am. :P Has been nothing but drama lately, with everything surrounding bitcoin the whole internet laughs at it. Guess you didn't mine any. Title: Re: delete Post by: ElectricMucus on September 04, 2011, 08:48:27 PM Admit it the only reason to be interested in preserving solidcoin is being entertained by the drama. I know I am. :P Has been nothing but drama lately, with everything surrounding bitcoin the whole internet laughs at it. Guess you didn't mine any. lawl Title: Re: delete Post by: gw4tt on September 04, 2011, 08:49:25 PM SmoothCoin, CleanCoin, QuickCoin
Title: Re: delete Post by: Bobnova on September 04, 2011, 09:00:49 PM RealCoin!
Title: Re: delete Post by: MaGNeT on September 04, 2011, 09:03:24 PM Solv3Coin
Because it solves al the problems other coins had before... Title: Re: delete Post by: pixilated8 on September 04, 2011, 09:04:14 PM I kind of like the SolidCoin Open Source. That way we can abbreviate it as SOS ;D
Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on September 04, 2011, 09:04:22 PM I'll just share this here
https://i.imgur.com/sw4oz.png Title: Re: delete Post by: JohnDoe on September 04, 2011, 09:51:35 PM I was a SC supporter but the Coinhunter/Real Solid punk has really pissed me off. You're acting like 95% of the people that are in Bitcoin aren't here for pure unadulterated profit! I have no problem admitting it. I could careless about Bitcoin or any digital currency. Ixcoin, I0coin, Shitcoin, Schmitcoin or Bitcoin has a ZERO future period unless instant transfer becomes a reality. I'm just thankfull that Magical Tux has created the "Magic The Gathering of Dumbasses" that will part with USD for it. LOL!!!! Title: Re: delete Post by: FlipPro on September 04, 2011, 09:54:22 PM I was a SC supporter but the Coinhunter/Real Solid punk has really pissed me off. You're acting like 95% of the people that are in Bitcoin aren't here for pure unadulterated profit! I have no problem admitting it. I could careless about Bitcoin or any digital currency. Ixcoin, I0coin, Shitcoin, Schmitcoin or Bitcoin has a ZERO future period unless instant transfer becomes a reality. I'm just thankfull that Magical Tux has created the "Magic The Gathering of Dumbasses" that will part with USD for it. LOL!!!! Title: Re: delete Post by: JohnDoe on September 04, 2011, 09:59:31 PM SmoothCoin, CleanCoin, QuickCoin Please guys let's stop using the ugly ass "coin" suffix. New chains that really care about making it to the mainstream should take the time to think of a sexier name. Title: Re: delete Post by: wolftaur on September 04, 2011, 10:00:38 PM SmoothCoin, CleanCoin, QuickCoin Please guys let's stop using the ugly ass "coin" suffix. New chains that really care about making it to the mainstream should take the time to think of a sexier name. Yeah. And SolidCoin would have been much more accurate if it was called SolidScrew. Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on September 04, 2011, 10:00:56 PM SmoothCoin, CleanCoin, QuickCoin Please guys let's stop using the ugly ass "coin" suffix. New chains that really care about making it to the mainstream should take the time to think of a sexier name. iCash Title: Re: delete Post by: ElectricMucus on September 04, 2011, 10:04:54 PM CyberCoins, definitely CyberCoins... It gets so warm and fuzzy inside once you even think about it :P
ok Cybercash ... whatever :-X Title: Re: delete Post by: Oldminer on September 04, 2011, 10:24:43 PM I know - let's 'future-proof' the next coin & call it Buttcoin. This way it will be ready to be the butt of the next joke around here ???
Title: Re: delete Post by: TwistedPair on September 05, 2011, 01:17:23 AM I meant what I said in all cases. I am 100% here for profit and no other reason. I have zero faith in any crypto-currency. Can someone fork Solidcoin with a new block chain? So you have zero faith in *coins but you want to create a new fork to profit from it. In order to profit, you need others to believe in your new SC spinoff. So if you don't believe in it yourself, why should others? Title: Re: delete Post by: fusebox on September 05, 2011, 01:23:07 AM Anyway Back on topic Can someone fork Solidcoin with a new block chain? Isn't this i0coin? Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on September 05, 2011, 01:24:02 AM I meant what I said in all cases. I am 100% here for profit and no other reason. I have zero faith in any crypto-currency. Can someone fork Solidcoin with a new block chain? So you have zero faith in *coins but you want to create a new fork to profit from it. In order to profit, you need others to believe in your new SC spinoff. So if you don't believe in it yourself, why should others? Wild speculation + low difficulty = $$$ Title: Re: delete Post by: greyhawk on September 05, 2011, 01:24:38 AM I meant what I said in all cases. I am 100% here for profit and no other reason. I have zero faith in any crypto-currency. Can someone fork Solidcoin with a new block chain? So you have zero faith in *coins but you want to create a new fork to profit from it. In order to profit, you need others to believe in your new SC spinoff. So if you don't believe in it yourself, why should others? Because the whole concept of cryptocoins relies on idiots being idiots. For information on how that works see the diverse mason threads and people still defending known scammers. As long as he makes money from idiots being idiots more power to him. He's the only sensible invisible hand in this free market. Title: Re: delete Post by: ElectricMucus on September 05, 2011, 01:25:29 AM Anyway Back on topic Can someone fork Solidcoin with a new block chain? Isn't this i0coin? stfu Title: Re: delete Post by: Oldminer on September 05, 2011, 01:31:04 AM Anyway Back on topic Can someone fork Solidcoin with a new block chain? Isn't this i0coin? No that was a fork of ixcoin. I know, it gets confusing around here sometimes with all the different coins. Title: Re: delete Post by: fusebox on September 05, 2011, 01:40:05 AM With merged in code from solid coin - and the fixed fee structure.. The only real benefit of solid coin is the retarget algorithm (hence why it was copied) everything else is window dressing.
Title: Re: delete Post by: Chris Acheson on September 05, 2011, 02:22:00 AM I meant what I said in all cases. I am 100% here for profit and no other reason. I have zero faith in any crypto-currency. Quote Anyway Back on topic Can someone fork Solidcoin with a new block chain? "Hey guys: fuck you, got mine. Also, can someone please do a bunch of work for me for free?" Title: Re: delete Post by: wolftaur on September 05, 2011, 02:23:21 AM "Hey guys: fuck you got mine. Also, can someone please do a bunch of work for me for free?" Why, did you want to fork it, break it, and then closed-source my open-source code after I didn't take your side? :) Title: Re: delete Post by: wolftaur on September 05, 2011, 02:27:22 AM Actually it's not much work from what I understand and YES I am asking, I do not know how to code. I have no problem admitting it. The main reason I want to see SC forked is to put CH back in his corner. Any fork should consider the "extra bounty blocks" he inserted at the "fix" point to be invalid and reject their outputs as transaction inputs. If we're gonna put CH in the corner let's do it right, dunce cap and all. Title: Re: delete Post by: doublec on September 05, 2011, 02:29:56 AM I have no interest in this, sorry.
Title: Re: delete Post by: smoothie on September 05, 2011, 02:54:05 AM I have no interest in this, sorry. You heard it, no solidcoin version will get an exchange from DoubleC. Moving on... |