Bitcoin Forum

Facebook Campaign and signature campaign, which do you prefer?

I do prefer Facebook account because I can participate in many bounties that way
Remember it’s a signature campaign you can do at a time
And that’s the only limitation

You can also enjoy medium or crypto compare campaign
They are fun easy and exciting
Or probably instagram and reddit  campaigns

Personally, I prefer signature sports.
And now that facebook isn't friendly to ICO ads, fewer and fewer of its bounty threads are supporting facebook's bounty campaign.

For the lower ranks like you OP. Its difficult to find for a signature campaign that will accept you so that means you cant stay with it. However there are hopes with other campaigns like social medias, its not only about facebook but theres also twitter and instagram. Dont forget other options like telegram campaigns.

You can simply check the number of tokens allocated for both of them. Signature campaigns usually has the higher percentage (2x or even 3x than facebook campaigns). The only advantage for facebook campaign is that you can participate in various campaigns at the same time unlike signature where you can only choose one.

Signature campaign if you have high rank and can make constructive post.

its depends on how much they pay you...
often signature campaign is better. imho

Most of the time it depends on the percentage of the reward threads.
While facebook can participate in multiple bounty threads, the bounty are generally not high.

I am now participating in Verasity. Quite a good bounty campaign. I think that the coin Vera will be successful.
I like the signature campaign, because of their greater cost.

I will always go for signature campaign any day. It save s my time and the payment is always higher. Signature will help in growing the knowledge of
forum members  and  it is through signature that issues of members are resolved by clearing any question they may have.

I prefer signature campaign. Mainly because i don't want to bother my good friends with spam :)

I think signature campaigns are better because her reward is huge compare to Facebook.

Signature campaign all the way. I like working on all the campaigns in this forum, but signature campaigns are my favorite in many ways. The biggest reason why I prefer signature campaigns over other campaigns is the rewards gained which are higher when compared to other campaigns. I prefer the signature campaigns that pay in both Bitcoin and altcoins though the ones that pay in Bitcoin are more reliable. Social media campaigns are also great in my opinion, but the rewards are usually lower when compared to signature campaigns.

Both campaigns are preferable but sometimes you can't participate in both if your forum rank is lower. A signature campaign is usually benificial to higher rank members which obviously you aren't able to do with your jr.member rank but on other side you are free to participate multiple facebook/twitter bounties without any restrictions

I prefer signature campaign the most over facebook. Signature campaign will have less participants in general and give rewards more. You can also get more information about cryptocurrency when you participate in signature campaign under which you have to post your posts in altcoin discussion. You can also get to interaction with cryptocurrency enthusiasts.

i do prefer signature campaign because if you choose signature campaign  i think you get a high profit coming from signature campaign but its depend to your rank on bitcointalk because if your rank on bitcointalk are jr member if you join it to signature campaign your profit are not because of your rank on bitcointalk and if you rank are very high like legendry i think your profit are great because of your rank on bitcointalk

if I prefer to participate in signature campaigns, since participating in signature campaigns is very profitable for me, the revenue I earn in participating in signature campaigns is just as I expected. but I also participated in the facebook campaign, twiter, and telegram, to supplement my income.

I like both but I prefer the signature campaign. because the result is bigger than the facebook campaign. does not mean the campaign is not good but the results of facebook campaign I can use for additional capital invest in coins that I think have a good future in the market.

I prefer signature campaigns to get more tokens from social media campaigns, but if the project is good and has the potential I choose to participate in both campaigns.  :)

I prefer signature campaign to facebook campaign because signature campaign makes me to acquire more knowledge about bitcoin, altcoins  and the blockchain technology. While the restrictions in facebook posting is much that i don't enjoy doing facebook campaign.

I really enjoy doing the signature campaigns because I can read about different altcoin news and also the trends on this forum and get paid for educating myself, or others and adding value to the forum. Facebook campaigns are only about copying and pasting other people's materials and although that sounds very easy, it can get a little more tedious than writing your own stuff and expressing your own opinions about the Crypto space in general.

I prefer to participate in both campaigns because by participating in both campaigns I will get a lot of tokens and if the project works well many investors are investing in the project, of course I will get a profit.

I prefer doing signature campaign since it pays more, I think it is hassle to post reports every week for the Facebook campaign. However, you can do both at the same time since signature campaigns are not time consuming, you can share about the project in your Facebook account on your spare time.

That is it depends on your rank for I rather choose signature because I don't have many friends in Facebook as required, and also in signature you earn more profit at the same time your learn more about crypto.

I prefer the signature campaign because the rewards are huge and the participation is less than the facebook campaign that can reach thousands of participants.

I'd prefer signature campaign because its more convenient in my part and I don't have lots of followers in facebook so I don't qualify for it. ;D. I'm the kind of person who doesn't really involve oneself to social medias. I wish I did make facebook account few years back for me to be eligible to join facebook campaign. I just made my twitter account as well this month. Still earning some more follwers. ;D

I prefer signature and facebook but as for now siganture because it to much maybe if I have person who accepts payment for Facebook campaign for 50 50 split of stakes. I really cant handle 2 at a time Iam still a person who works out of the world of cryptocurrency.

Still when you think about it facebook it a little bit easier and when you have many followers/facebook friends you get paid more and not hase on your bitcointalk rank. In the I would pick signature for now and later if I have more facebook friends I would join a bounty.

Signature campaigns is the best for me this time around than Facebook campaigns because signature campaign gives me more experience in the blockchain technology world. I learn a lot from signature campaign from my comments and posting.

Same goes to me, signature campaign is most likely the best. Doing signature compaign makes you evolve and you can even express your thoughts and opinion especially in this forum. Theres a lot to learn just doing signature campaign,and so much more during bounty campaign.

I prefer to do them both. Signature campaign benefits are higher bounty rewards and you get in to the idea of a project better. Whereas FB you can run multiple campaigns, not just one campaign (like signature), takes longer time to do the task and harder to check stakes, if you do multiple campaigns at the same time.

doing a signature campaign would be a great idea , because you will learn more knowledge about the cryptocurrency and in this industry. also ,you have a freedom to say your opinion to one thing. you can read a lot of news and updates about the cryptocurrency so that your knowledge will be widen. and the most important and worth it. while you read informatiin you will have an earnings.

with my current rank certainly be compelling reasons to love the signature campaign. definitively clear allocation and the results obtained are higher than on facebook. In addition to the signature of the participant is also not as much as facebook, so opportunities for results could certainly be counted his own comparison between the two.

If I could choose both, then I will choose both. Since both are also equally produce. However, I'd prefer in the signature campaign. Since most of the campaign, the allocation given to the signature that was larger than any other campaign.

The social network said in a Facebook for Business post that split testing enables advertisers to “simply and accurately” test different components of their campaigns across different devices and browsers, providing results that are easy to digest. If you opt in, we’ll let you know which version of your ad is performing best as soon as we have enough data. If you prefer to wait until all data has been compiled, you’ll get this information once your campaign is complete. You can apply these learnings by restarting the winning campaign or when creating future campaigns.

if I join both, because I also have a lot of followers and friends in my social media, and the results are okay to add from the bounty signature that I follow. so I get paid from both campaigns

I perfer Signature campaign because their rewards are higher compare to Facebook, depending on your rank and the quality post you make.
And I think in signature campaign you will learn more about crypto currency

Signature campaign if we have good level of profile, Currently working on uncloak signature campaign.

Definitely signature campaign for me. For the last three months, i seldom open my facebook account because of personal reasons. It is becoming a habit for me reading posts and comments in this forum, learning new things and at the same time earning.

For me its depend, i mean because signature campaign if i want to earn bitcoin weekly 'cause i didn't see any bounty campaign that pays bitcoin weekly, so for facebook campaign and actually in twitter campaign also, i join that if i want to participate their project to get their token.

I prefer choosing a signature campaign because he has fewer participants who follow unlike more facebooks ..
but I think it's better to play media campaigns like .Blogger.steemit there we can help ICO more with the work of the articles we make

Signature campaign is the best for sure, because the reward that you can receive for it is much better. With facebook campaigns you will probably receive tokens worth only $10-$20 because of the high number of participants in the campaign. On the signature campaign not so many people can participate.

I'm sure that everybody will prefer signature campaign because it will bring a lot of profit after campaign is finished.
Facebook and Twitter campaign is usually contractive many people join because it is easier than signature campaign even they can use many fake account to join to social campaign but because of this should the profit which you can be got in the future, is very low.
If you have social account which have many follower then you should only join campaign which will pay by Bitcoin.

If I were hanging from your favorite course. If your account rank high, certainly more promising to pick a signature campaign. But for the account of a still rank below, it looks like the facebook campaign is also interesting to follow. If I usually I see it used to be his greater bounty allocation which.

Signature campaign is good and much more potential to earn. Just see first all the xls/spreadsheet percentage calculation amount report of the bounty campaign, the signature campaign is more points than facebook campaign. But the facebook campaign is quite easy to do than signature campaign, just post and share then copy the link above and do the reporting stuff. Easy like that, don't choose and do it both if you are a true bounty hunter.

I prefer signature campaign than facebook campaign. I'll admit that I am not fond of social media promotions but I am into signature campaigns right from the very start. Though many members here are joining both facebook and signature campaign, there are still different perspective for each and everyone. Signature campaigns is more exciting for me.

You can read a lot of news and updates about the cryptocurrency so that your knowledge will be widen. and the most important and worth it. While you read informatiin you will have an earnings.

If you can manage your time and you can do both it is better. The more participation you have and if the ICO  project is successful you can have more benefits.

Signature campaign is totally better but in some case you still have to join Facebook bounty cause some bounty campaigns don't have signature bounty part :)). But IMO, I think you can join both Facebook and Signature bounty, it'll not take you to much some every day ;D, beside you can increase number of token you can earn from bounty campaign ;D

The situation is such that it is becoming increasingly difficult to take part at the campaign bounty on Facebook due to the ban on advertising crypto currency in this social network. Often user accounts are blocked for this reason. Therefore, participation in the campaign of signatures on the bitcointalk forum is safer and undoubtedly more profitable!

I think you should join both. A signature campaign gives you better rewards than a Facebook campaign, but for a limited time you can only participate in one project, so you have to choose a good project to join. I encourage you to participate in both facebook and twitter campaigns since so many of the participants are rewarded by a project that is usually small so you can participate in more projects to earn more rewards.

Everything has advantages and disadvantages, choose a campaign that suits your abilities. I am currently following a signature campaign and also some facebook campaigns and there is no problem with it.

Facebook and Twitter campaign is usually contractive many people join because it is easier than signature campaign even they can use many fake account to join to social campaign but because of this should the profit which you can be got in the future, is very low.
If you have social account which have many follower then you should only join campaign which will pay by Bitcoin.

I prefer the signature company because it gets a bigger percentage than Facebook.But you can also participate in both.

For me, always in priority the signature campaigns, but in facebook and Twitter I also participate.

based on your rank its very hard to find a good signature campaign which they allowed junior members. But  if you find one you should do both  facebook and signature campaign. In signature campaign you need to have a time to post everyday because it has  minimum requirements in every signature campaign in order to get stakes mostly its on weekly based. Also in facebook campaign some of it is just you shared their post or sometimes you do a good post.

To be honest i never tried facebook campaign when i started here in bitcointalk. I tried bounty and signature campaign. I love joining in bounty and signature campaign because it doesn't takes time for me to work and aside from that i can also have stable job while doing signature campaign.

I prefer a signature campaign rather than a facebook campaign. However, to participate in a signature campaign requires a high ranking if you want maximum results. To climb the rankings in the forum requires a lot of merit and it becomes a difficult obstacle.

I prefer both of them, because they are different and you can do do them at the same time. Of course, signature campaign is more profitable, but as for me, it's good idea to participate in  signature campaign and twitter/facebook.

Signature Campaign is better and rewarding but if you can do both it would be best. Social Media campaign now sometimes is a waste of time since there are many participants doing it. At the end of the campaign the token will be distributed depends on the stakes. Please do join also based on allocation on the campaign to know more about the potential of the reward.

I prefer to participate in signing events because signature activities are the most valuable. Signing activities are simpler and easier to participate. Social media activities usually require regular reports. I don't like this step.

You can do both actually. Signature campaigns require at least some effort, while facebook campaigns are mostly about clicking “like” and “share” buttons. Is there really any problem to do it for some tokens? As for me there is no need to choose.

Signature, it's so much profitable than Facebook campaign. Thanks to the merit system it's very hard to achieve higher rank, which is a little problem for me, because I cannot get to higher rewards, it's better in FB where you get new friends easily.

Of course signature.
First reason is,it has great value of reward that will be given to the bounty hunters. In signature campaign you can just use 1 account at a time. Since here in BTC,multiple account is prohibited. But in facebook,you can join many bouties as you can. And the reward will be divided in to numbers of participants.

Signature campaign for me, most of the bounty campaign give the highest percentage 20%-35% in signature as this campaign having the big rule in project. signature and avatar in every post you make. While fb campaign is also good but just have a 10%-15% in the campaign. The more percentage the more token so signature campaign is what I preferred in bounty.

I prefer signature campaign because mostly signature campaign has higher rewards cimpare to other social media campaigns. Furthermore, it is in forum like this that I got to learn more about cryptocurrency.

of course I prefer signature campaign compared to facebook campaign. because the allocation for signature campaigns is usually larger than the facebook campaign with fewer participants

Facebook already start to ban ICO groups and messages. Most of ICO's give away very small percentage of bounty to facebook campains.

I prefer for signature campaign because it is more profitable than facebook campaign and most of the ICO's the signature campaign much bigger percentage of the budget than facebook campaign that's the reason why i do prefer in signature campaign.

signature campaign of course. I do not think you can earn more token by participating in facebook campaign than signature campaign because the percentage allocated for signature campaign most time is always higher than those allocated for facebook and most time the number of people participating in facebook is alway greater than signature campaign which means you will earn less token in participating in signature campaign than in facebook campaign. however signature campaign work is always stressful and time consuming than facebook because you have to meet the number of weekly post in a limited board if you want to get stake for that week.

Ideal option is to take part in both. However it's necessary to choose very carefully the signature company, because mistake in the choice can bring to that you won't receive anything because of skam, or the award will be small. Plus signature company takes not much of time. It's need to write just some messages, usually 10-15. With Facebook it's little simpler, there initially award is less therefore it's worth taking part in several companies at the same time. Thus will be less risk not to gain reward because of skam and total income will be quite good. but it will already take away much more time. In bounty the most spent resource this personal time. Therefore you should choose the companies proceeding first of all from that factor.

Same thought with me before, but now I'm working with my facebook campaign after realizing that you can actually do both at the same time. Yes, your profit from facebook campaign might be lower but at least you can have profit for an easy job. Learn to maximize the opportunity here in cryptomarket, and if you can work more on bounty go ahead :)

Personally i prefer signature campaign to facebook campaign because signature campaign makes me to acquire more knowledge about bitcoin, altcoins  and the blockchain technology while earning as well

Personally i do  not use facebook campagings due to the facct that i do not want to report all my activites to receieve the tokens. Sometimes  i take part in twitter campaigns

What is a facebook campaign? Can someone please tell me?

many people follow social media campaigns if they are compared to the signature campaign, as many people who do not have a high rank to be able to follow the signature campaign, and who have a high rank they also partially follow the social media campaign, I prefer a signature campaign.

Facebook and twitter have thousands of participants so i prefer signature campaign because the rewards are bigger

Of course, the signature of the company will bring you a good reward, but on the other hand, you can participate in several projects at the same time using Facebook.

If we consider only facebook and signature then definitely signature will give you more rewards. I can recommend you the project Asura Coin it is extended to 31 July and I can say with confidence that this project deserves your attention. It has a huge bounty pool with a great stakes in signature campaign.