Bitcoin Forum

Hello all members!
I am a bounty hunter, as well as many of you  :) ;)
And I heard that bounty hunters dump the coin price at the ico end.
So I was wondering, if the team doesn't want its coins to be sold on exchange date and thus be dumped, why they reward bounty hunters with their token, not FIAT.
Because they anyway accept fiat for selling the tokens, so the coin won't be dumped by bounty hunters, and bounty hunters are satisfied too.
Because those who need money, they have it, those who want tokens, can buy it at exchange etc.

I think it is a good opinion, but projects would not want to do this considering the facts that they are trying to raise money from ICOS for their project, so if they pay with fiats, it affects their income.

and funy enough, most projects do not pay to list in exchange, they still beg for votes.
Lets all bounty hunters wait, work and see what will be decided about this kind of scenario.

Let us be absolutely honest your supposition is wrong because participants of bounty campaigns cannot drop prices of really strong and perspective companies because there are tremendous demand on such companies and prices grow despite of anything.

Your logic is good enough but it can not be done simply because it is against the ICO rule. Also organizations are raising fund to complete their project they give payments to all the team who works for them with their coin.

How are you going to accept fiat payments? Have you thought about that?

PayPal??  just kidding. Fiat is hardly an option.

But they could pay us in bitcoin. Most of the bounty hunters are dumping their coins for bitcoin anyways.

Paying bounty hunters in fiat might be a welcome idea for those who can exchange their fiat very easily when they are paid. However some of the bounty hunters might want to own the tokens of the project especially if the project is a good one. Also the idea of paying in fiat will help solved the issue of dumping.

No way that could happen.

They'd rather risk it by letting bounty hunters get a part of their coin. There is no guarantee they will hit a large equivalent of USD with their token that is why they just give it like that.
They want ETH and BTC. Why? There is guarantee with that. They will never try to exchange those just so they could pay their workers which they dont even know who.  ;D

You should think as a company- it's like paying with stocks instead of fiat to people who provides you services.
If your whole company ends up to be a failure,you will lose money because the people who received payments for you received it as stocks so you don't really lose extra money.

To summarize, you minimize your risks by paying people with their tokens instead of real money, from the company's view.

In the people's aspect, if they do trust the company that offers them the bounty and beilieves in it, they won't really mind to get shares instead of getting real money.
Not a big deal for them I guess.

a team will never pays you in Fiat money. because paying you in cryptos represent an advantage in terms of costs...
and don't worry, the price doesn't go down because of few bounty hunters dumps.
Price goes down because of other factors, you should worry when team members dump the coins of the project.
if they want to do so, you should dump the coin too... imho.

The idea is very good, but very not many creators of cryptocurrency will agree to such conditions. Though it would save the market of cryptocurrencies from a large number of swindlers. But also and not all hunters will be glad to receive FIAT. There are people who hold tokens for years before his growth.

It not a bad idea. Anway it is funny how the teams take advantage of the heavy publicity by bounty hunting and then they complain that BH sell too early.

I don't think it will be a good idea. Because it will take a lot of resources in sending fiat to every bounty hunters. That's why we have this digital currency to eliminate slow transactions. But i would definitely looking forward for an eth payment for a bounty program.

One of the major issues would be you would need to provide your financial payment details to these ICOs, and would you really trust them with this? Also, the payment processing fees would be quite considerable, particularly when summing the IBAN fees or Paypal fees that would be necessary for this, and the time cost for manually sending all of these payments. Also, the major reason is they simply don't want to pay real money, hence why they offer their tokens.

It is not possible, because most tokens worth nothing after ico and they are basically worthless this is why they pay with tokens instead of usd. USD is real money tokens are not.

I will somewhat agree with your suggestion, best case scenario would be that the bounty campaign should give the option while filling the form if the participant want to be rewarded with tokens or eth/btc. So that everyone can take the best option according to hos needs and strategy.

Most of the ICO have no fiat reserved. ICO is made to make an initial amount to kick off the market. If Fiat for bounty hunter it will bankrupt the ICO. And the other issue is you need to reveal yourself to get the fiat. Requirements today to transfer a fiat is a lot.

Bounty team will never pay you with fiat money for providing services, because if the company pay you in fiat in case of failure they will loose fiat mone and in other case they will not loose anything, only coins. We are heading towards digitization and with techlonology upgrading crypto currency will be future currency, so it is better to have coins whether it is altcoins, ETH or BTC.

Thats because they dont have money! Well, that is the reason they have the ICO fund raiser. So that they can raise the money for various purposes including the marketing stages. Where as bounty is considered as part of marketing and they always allocate X % of that fund to be given to them. This way they secure rest of the money and dont get into loss even if the bounty hunters dump their token. If they were suppose to pay you in fiat then they will have to give that money from their pockets. This is because they can not exchange their raised ETH or BTC to fiat as it will break the chain of funds as soon as they convert it to fiat. They will be questioned by the banks, regulatory bodies and it would eventually will become very complicated. May be thats why they wont go that way.

Yeah not a bad idea actually. I would imagine that funds are tight on smaller projects though.

That's great idea. It would be good if the team had money for its implementation. The ICO is to be held in order to raise money. If the project team had cash, there would be no need to conduct an ICO.

This idea seems fine, but it is not applicable by the team members of the projects, it seems hard so

Yes, because ICO is a fundraiser for project implementation. Many projects don't have the money to pay you. Since the project is not working yet. It takes time for the project to start making a profit.

It requires zero money to create a token so it is always easier for projects to apportion a part of total supply to bounty hunters than giving FIAT because no one can guarantee that ICO will actually raise anything. However not all projects do this. There are several projects that spend FIAT or Bitcoin/ETH for bounty marketing that even before raising anything. So now it becomes a parameter to determine whether a project is really serious or is it just another shit token project. If projects spending money on marketing then its of former kind but if it just spending its token that mostly it is of latter kind.

Good idea but this thing wont easily happen or not at all!

Bounty allocations arent too big for them to worried about such dump 1-2% max wont really make a great impact on price dumps but rather i do believe its investors are the real dumpers. They wont tend out to pay up on fiat even though bounty participants will just sell out their coins. Profits would be mainly affected and if i were part of the team i wont give out profits and secure it by myself.lol

Fiat is simply technically and institutionally impossible to pay to the members of the ICO generosity campaign, even if the ICO team would like to do it. It will be easier to pay bitcoin and ethereum. It would be especially good in this case to pay the ethereum, and the participants in the generosity campaign could be given the right to choose what to receive payments for their services - in the released tokens or ethereum. This could be indicated in the form when joining the ICO project. Here even the purse address would be the same. However, they are unlikely to want to take such a step in the ICO team, it is not profitable for them, they are trying to sell their produced tokens.

It is not good for projects as token payment. And the influence of bounty hunters is not so big as people think.

It's really a good opinion.But it's hard to pay in fiat there is some resons.One of them is most of the time they collect  crypto on ico.So they have to sell it somewhere and sometimes it's a big problem.They raise money for development of they give that to bounty hunters it's not good for them.And bounty hunters from not one country that all have one other fiat so it's hard to give them fiat.If they really want to drop the price it's better if they give the payment in tether  :P

that would be an pretty nice idea to pay bounties in fiat. But you have to consider that there are some bounty hunters out there who like to get paid in token cause they believe in the project the support with their signature!

Some projects do offer this but to be honest it is a great loss to the ICO company because if they pay in Fiat or ethereum, they have to do it from their pocket or raised funds. But if they offer bounty in their tokens, other users will pay for that.

It seems to me that no one just thought about such a scheme of reward. Simply, the payment is initially assigned and everything, from this the calculation of the reward is already going on, and what will happen next is that nobody really thinks.

It will never happen. Giving out tokens provides little risk to a start up and encourages the bounty hunters to do their best to make the project a success when it hits exchanges

Oh nice, that is not a bad idea, but I don't think developers will like to that, Because as they transact their tokens, it helps their ICO and project as well. They will be more interested in transacting their tokens rather than FIAT.

And how do you imagine the payment for the work process? Also as %. And I want to note that there are companies that pay real money. Just last month, a similar company was completed, in which some people received payment in the form of dollars for certain work.
If the company does not collect the necessary amount of funds, they will have to pay real money at a time when they have so very little for the development of the project? It is easier to give tokens so that we do not wait for the promised amount for many months, without the opportunity to start working with a new company.
I hope I helped you with your answer.

 I would very much like to be paid in FIAT coins, because very often, after the bounty hunters receive their tokens they immediately think about selling them, and this damages the development of the projects, the investors, and the other bounty hunters who, like me, they decide to keep the tokens to sell them in the future. I hope that in the future this excellent idea can become a reality

Its easier for us to say but its big risk for the developers. I mean we know very well how many scammers are there with multi accounts schemes and robbing the bounties like crazy. I think in such cases it would be better to have bounty tokens as part of allocation however fiat can actually rob the developers very badly and may not get the quality investors afterwards. I mean after this allocation no will be interested in the project because people will be getting the fiat itself and would consider it more than sufficient. Bounty tokens actually keep people engaged with the project and they stay their long term. Thats the difference in it.

Here on the forum and all bitcoiners want to be anonymous. If the fiat paying option available in bounty also most of the people will go with the bitcoin or concern gonna work for it. Then I do not understand how this got this mind as bounty payment.
I see the investors open up the bounty to both promotion and investment for the project via this promotion. Once all success and hard cap reached team is very feeble to distribute their tokens. I am not sure how you can get the payment. Is there any idea planned with being anonymous?

So one thing to keep in mind is that these tokens are just worthless tokens to the team, and they don't have to pay anything.
However, if they pay you the ETH, they may pay a lot of money. ::)

Alright, when they are paying through use the mainstream crypto with so many daily trade volume and it will be really help a lot to keep the price of the token become very stable. I guess that's the only possibility. I never think we will get our payment through use the fiat payment.

Then it wouldn't be called as bounty hunting but FIAT hunting instead. The company is making their own coin so they really don't care giving it out for free in exchange for some tasks from the hunters. The reason they are doing an ICO is for them to raise funds. One way of doing bounty campaigns is to get their name out and let the community be involved with their project without risking of spending the companies FIAT money for advertising their good name.

Because it's basically free for them, they make the coins for next to nothing. Obviously better for them than giving money away.

I think there is some instance that there is a direct a BTC reward in some bounty campaign, in every rank, have a different reward value, there is no such tokens involve in this campaign.

The word business says it all. If you study management or something about business you will know how business works and all of company are applying what they learn about management in their business as well as projects ICO. Some ICO I think are rewarding FIAT tokens as a salary but not all, they are wiser than you think. Just imagine how this things will work if all of the ICO will be rewarding FIATs, no one will ever get interested in tokens which is more profitable than FIATs.

Whatever the form, the prizes received by the campaign participants do not need to be the problem. The most important thing is, the gift is in accordance with their business and work. And the waiting period is also not too long, one of them is in the form of fia

It is unreal to dump with 2% of coins which bounty hunters have at all. So investors are the main dumpers, I think. And the main goal of bounty campaigns is nor earnings for hunters.

In a crypto market, Fiat can not be selected as a form of payment for any bounty. I have not noticed this in any campaigns. Maybe they will pay with btc or eth. Also, fiat was never chosen. - The market is based on the principle of fiat and crypto rotation. The ICO project will not survive such a bounty if it goes against the trend and that principle.

It makes sense but really I don't think it is going to happen!

I think it's good idea, but I think that FIAT reward will not implemented. I think that BTC or ETH reward which has been widely applied in many bounty campaign. But I prefer token reward, so it's feel like invest in ICO without spend money.

Well i think it would be great idea, but you have to remember ICO is all about picking up fiat money, so i don't think any ICO will give bounty hunter fiat money, they give away coin because its their own coin, they don't have to pay any money :)

Bounty hunters do not greatly affect the price of the token. Much more price collapses of the early investors, which have bonuses of up to 50%. Even advisers can dump the price. Not everything is so simple.

One form of reward that gifts participants can receive is a firefighter or fiat currency. They can do much with the prize. And this is a form of concern for all bounty campaign participants.

An interesting thought, I agree that few bounty hunters hold coins, everyone starts selling them. However, I think that it will not be profitable for the developers

That is indeed a good idea to avoid dumping on the coins.
But not all bounty hunter dumping the coins after they get the reward from bounty.
Some of them keeping the coins for future need.

Because paying bounty hunters with tokens means for them having people working for free. They don't pay the tokens, since they are the issuers (so basically bounties is free advertising for them). Instead, if they pay them with ETH/BTC or fiat, they have to pay them with real money and so is a cost.

I guess that's good enough to prevent dumps but will that make the bounty hunter interested? I myself was less interested in the bounty campaign that is paid by using fiat, because fiat prices tend to be more stable and less volatile

The bounty team wont give a singe penny with that kind of work. because it is not their fault when the ICO failed. Better to sell bounty token if the project dont even rich in encore.

In my opinion, one of the biggest problems in the sector is the devaluation of tokens after the distribution of the bounty campaigns. It happens often and, in order not to damage the blockchain platforms, and those who believed in the project by investing or storing the tokens of the bounty campaign, to pay the bounty hunters with FIAT money in my opinion is an excellent idea

There's some bounty who able to pay both ETH and bitcoin instead of paying tokens, but its really rear most of the project now are offering tokens, with how the hunters react really affect the growth of the project it can extend the development since developers need to adjust with those dumped coins from the market, I like the idea with such type of bounties giving the exact fiat amount that will b rewarded to its participants and don't need to wait for the token/coins to reach the exchange.

This is the whole point of the bounty, so that projects do not need large budgets.

If you do not want to lose money, when the price of the token falls, then you need to participate in the bounty from stable tokens

Most of the ICO accepts ETH rather than accepting USD. If they'll pay with USD, they have to convert their raised ETH to USD and then give it to the bounty hunters. It will affect ETH's price in the long run because there are hundreds to thousands of ICOs out there.

Not all ICO project only wanna be listed for free :). You should know that there are so many good ICO project already get future exchange while their ICO is not ended yet. But there are some exchange that you can get listed by paying but you need to get vote from other member, for example Kucoin is an exchange that almost cryptocurrencies need to get vote to get listed on :)

Yes, paying by fiat could be a good option since most hunters dump their coins after the ICO and thus it reduces the price of that coin.

Maybe you should propose an option of fiat payment so that any bounty hunter who wants fiat can choose. 😍

I think you are one of those that believe bounty hunters are the main cause of tge dump of every token that lunches newly on exchange. Which also means you too dump every token you receive. Well, i would say that a project that is well planned and e executed will not dump, even if bounty hunters are involved. I have even seen instances of dumped tokens despite bounty hunters not being paid.

I think paying bounty hunter with fiat is a good idea and very beneficial for bounty hunter, but it is very harmful for bounty exhibitors, because their goal of holding bounty is to prioritize ICO's success, and to pay bounty with their tokens, as well as promotional introduction

This topic can be looked at from different perspective, it's a good suggestion that bounty hunters be paid in fiat or ETH to prevent the most likely eventual dump of the tokens when distributed. Nevertheless it should be noted that some projects are highly hyped and bounty hunters actually feel lucky to be able to participate in the bounty as a way to get some tokens for themselves so it would be unfavorable for them to be paid in fiat.
The best way to do this is offer bounty hunters a chance to choose which currency they want to be paid in, with the price pegged at the tokens value during the ico

That is not quite a thruth that bounty hunters dump token price. Bounty hunters get so small percentage of tokens, they can't make great influence on the market. Early bird investors, bonuses, panicers also can dump ico price. And the ico main idea is to extend project tokens. Thre is no reason to pay rewards
 in fiat for campanies.

Not bad idea but companies won't do it. Bounty is not only about paying for job, its about branding. When they are paying with their tokens, it also works for branding. No reason to reward with fiat when they can pay with tokens.

Because they are not very smart and they are greedy.

Think of it, if they give coins, they basicaly do not pay you anything.
Someone pays you when they buy these tokens baised on their perceptions of the ICO ehich raised osme amount of money.

If they give you other currencies or ETH they actually give you something that has value.

Why I told that they are stupid, because IF they have tokens for team, they are dumping the price of their own tokens.
If they have a large % of tokens, they could care and they just might give you ETH, i have seen that happen.

I agree, this could be a good option, but for bad ICO. Since hunters usually drop the price to get cheaper and buy more coins.

This is a total BS opinion that bounty hunts dump the coins. This opinion is just something the weak hand amateur investors that the space in the community worry about. I see prices dumping why before bounty is released; and have personally tracked bounty distribution with prices movements and didn’t find any dumping by bounty hunters. Just weak hand childish FUD. There are actual study’s that prove that dumping is based on a he nation of the people who participated in the ico. Philippines, Nigeria, Russians, and Irish dump their coins the fastest; that’s a fact

Because most projects are are doing ICO or initial coin offering  meaning they don't have fiat money to pay for advertisements only tokens/coins. Projects team raise funds or fiat money by doing ICO to further support the application they made or to sustain for thr good of the projecct so that it can be a successful project. I am also a bounty hunter and I am not dumping my tokens at the end or when the tokens has been distributed I just wait and hold it until the time I need to sell it and convert it all to fiat money.

Please show some evidence of this other that just an opinion you hear somewhere or basing it on what you would do. As a newbie maybe that why YOU are trying to develop a signature; to dump, but that’s YOU!! Most bounty hunter act th e same way investors do, take out a little then hold the rest; most even hold all as the didn’t risk fiat!!

Your opinion is good. But I think it will not be done by new project or ico. This is because the purpose of bounty or airdrop is basically to form the community of the project and expect significant growth from the project, so they pay with the token.

I think paying with fiat is far true to be possible.Each ICO has their own project to promote as well as with their tokens.If you trust the campaign you have joined,then you should not worry if you will be paid with tokens,you have all the freedom to convert it to fiat when you received it already as long as it is already available in the exchanger.

I made some comments about this topic earlier, but forgot to add one very important point. Bounty hunter who are agreeing with or even speculating about this false dumping rumor are foolish. If you participate in this discussion your are giving this false idea support which will lead to more bounty trying to scam us. THINK!!

I think there are many bounty hunters will choose fiat because the price is going down and takes more time before recovers. Having much stable amount of salary maybe good in the market now and used it to exchange will make them much higher volume of crypto coins.

Tokens are free for the coin team so they can spend any amount as they like. They set certain price per token during ico and not all coins are sold that period. Part of the remaining token they keep and distribute other to bounty hunters. What they sell or distribute during ico are just free tokens which they can generate easily.

They won't be spending any fiat they have got from investors. Those fiat goes to ico owners which they spent mostly on their entertainment.

They said that Bounty hunters should earn rewards on Fiat but for me i wanted to get ETH or bitcoin. Fiat seems useless to me i need to earn monster profit in cryptocurrency. The best rewards right now is to accumulate more tokens.

The bounty hunters join in specific bounty to get not just the money  they join in there because they need the value of tokens and they also see the project as good in the future not all people in the bounty section wanted just money. They see the value of it and the platform to be good in future.

It's a good thing if we receive fiat rewards and additional of token supply that they are promoting. But i guess some bounty hunters wanted to get more stakes/ ICO token and hodl for long term.

I think right suggestion but there nothing dev's can pay fiat money for their project for the participants
its unfair to the investors because investor buying token use the fiat money or bitcoin as capital and hoping after the icos end they can receive tokens or coins came from the project to earn profits if the project successful.

Your logic is good enough but it can not be done simply because it is against the ICO rule. Also organizations are raising fund to complete their project they give payments to all the team who works for them with their coin....

Bad idea, it would be still acceptable if the rewards were paid in ETH or BTC.
I don't usually cash out my tokens received from bounty campaigns, instead of it I hold them or if their price is good I change them to ETH and then I hold ETH. In my country it's a bit dangerous to recieve money if you're not employed officially, so I can't imagine getting paid through PayPal or something.

Bounty hunters are always accused of selling coins at exchange listing but it's not true for all. Some people keep their coins and wait for price to appreciate well before selling. It would be a good idea if Bounty hunters are paid in eth or btc.

Awarding a bounty member with fiat instead of a token will give them neither the excitement nor the motivation to bounty the ICO. If you pay with a fiat currency or buy back a token with fiat currency will make the Token of the project is not attractive and the volume of transactions is low, this in the future will make the project lack potential and not attract the big investors.

from what I learned, the idea of bounty and airdrop is for mass adaption and distribution same like faucet where people can get their share of that crypto and be able to use when they want it.

Also, why would they like to pay in fiat when we are in cryptoworld. idea of cryptocurrency is to be free from using fiat so why would anyone pay or get paid with fiat?!

Also ico token is free on ico project dev so giving them away doesnt cost them at all.

 Also, it may seems dumping but did you know that when people starting to trade (buy/sell) the token they actually started to give trading volume to that project making it easiser for the token to be listed to cmc which need 100k trading volume.

No, most of hunters really sell as soon as they can. But it's not the real problem. The problem is not with hunters, but with coins and their small trading volume. Basically, the supply is higher then the demand, that's why these coins get dumped. It wouldn't happen to a coin with a good trading volume. For example, take a look at IOSt, a project in my signature. It's traded on Binance and many other exchanges, it pays participants every week, but it isn't dumped every week.

this is quite hard for the ICO team that they pay in FIAT. The reason they conduct ICOs is to raised enough funds for the project or concept they want to do, so definitely they dont have cash/fiat to fund those projects. so this is quite imposibble. They can pay the hunters with eth or bitcoin.

i still prefer payed with tokens and then send it to my wallet. also funds raise in ICOs will be used in developing their project. price goes down after coins hit exchange because of low in demand. many were selling and few were buying.

I think if paid using FIAT they can not take advantage of the price of their own token, so if using token there will be a difference of the price specified by the token sale price.

[1] This goes the same way with investors. You can find ICOs that has no bounties but the price dumps anyway.
[2] The tokens they issue literally has no value in the market (until it gets listed in exchanges that is). So they avoid spending bitcoin/fiat/eth/et cetera and essentially made their marketing free. This is used by them in case their project fails.

Because the project party is very clear that his project is not necessarily successful, even if it will be successful but it will take a long time, so the value of his own token is not clear enough, but the financing of the ether is very certain, it is valuable and will appreciate So they are more willing to hold the ether.

Actually dumped coin from bounty hunters is good for new investors who want to buy the tokens.
But if you want to find a bounty that paid by BTC (which can't you dump), you can go to service section.

I'm sure that the team will have their considerations why They prefer to choose giving their tokens although it is very risky for dumping price after ICO. Well, I have also read about the rewards for bounty hunter that should be in Ethereum as well. I think these two ways are good to minimize the dump coins. Therefore, probably they will think about it. But, in my opinion, in fiat, it will be difficult. But, in ETH. it is much better.

This is one of the marketing strategies in the ICO. they pay for crypto from the products they create with the goal of one is to marketing. If you don't like that way then the products they create will not be widely circulated and only investors who want to buy only one wants to have.

It will take a lot of resources in sending fiat to every bounty hunters. If they were supposed to pay you in fiat then they will have to give that money from their pockets. This is because they cannot exchange their raised ETH or BTC to fiat as it will break the chain of funds as soon as they convert it to fiat.

It's a good idea, but I don't think it's possible at the moment. I doubt that many companies will accept this because most of them just don't have fiat money. That's why they are doing ICO. In addition, this would be disadvantageous for them due to high fees and legal risks.

Companies pay rewards to bounty hunters in their coins because they have no other, and in fact for their work bounty hunters get nothing-only wrappers, which can be and will be something to cost if the project starts and will be successful. In order to get paid in fiat just get a job in an advertising agency)))

Yes by the time of ICO ending the prices of token will fall, mainly due to bounty hunters will sell off their bounty rewards. If they give FIAT currency, it's a good Idea but they won't give. There might be some technical issues.

I think its a fantastic idea. That dumping by bounty hunters had been a problem to this Airdrop/bounty system and also to the ICO investors so if the bounty hunters can be rewarded with Fiat then all these issues can be solved while keep availing the services of Bounty hunters for promotions and marketing stuff.

Your logic of dump is only applicable on the low profile ICOs, strong project are not affected by this shitty things

What is FIAT? I can always hear it in many places. Is this the meaning of cash? I feel that they are a kind of thing, new people, not very clear.

For the ICO team, rewarding in token means that it is basically free, so they obtain bounty promotion at zero cost since the token has no value at that moment. Rewarding in FIAT or Btc means that the ICO team has to really pay for the bounty services and thus use reserves etc..

Payments in fiat are not possible. Lots of factors influence on this - fiat is regulated by taxes, and as different participants are from different countries, so the taxes are regulated by different governmental institutions and lots of different rules. So it may cause the problem even for lots of participants to get such payments in fiat, even in case to imagine it happens. But the main idea of ICO and cryptocurrency just quite another. So fiat is better for another things.

indeed the average bounty hunter sells all of his tokens, but not all of them. there is also a bounty hunter that keeps holding tokens until the product releases or until the roadmap has run successfully. but I think it's better for developers to pay rewards with btc, eth or neo (according to the platform they use) rather than fiat money. this is indeed able to avoid token dumped by bounty hunter, but what if ico achievement is not high or just reach soft cap?

Hmm, I don't think sure some project want to pay their bounty hunters with FIAT. Because many projects not guarantee will success, and if they paid their bounty hunters with FIAT, If their project FAIL It can affect more loss from their finance...

But I see some of the projects that I found in this forum want to pay their bounty hunters with BTC, I think is a good deal for us. Maybe you can try to find it on bounties subforum in this Forum...

I think that this is impossible. First of all, this is not interesting for the organizers of the bounty campaigns themselves. After all, they collect money, but do not distribute it. Bounty is therefore organized, because for the ICO this in fact is free.

I think paying bounty hunter with fiat is a good idea and very beneficial for bounty hunter, but it is very harmful for bounty exhibitors, because their goal of holding bounty is to prioritize ICO's success, and to pay bounty with their tokens, as well as promotional introduction

It is not a good idea to ay bounty hunters with fiat. Why? Because mainly, the reason bounty hunters are aid in coins is because this will help the team increase the demand for the coin, thus, generating a higher value which will benefit both the team and the ICO supporters. Bounty hunters are also the main traders so without the coins, they cannot trade, buy and sell which is important. Second, paying in fiat means that the team wil be giving real money, how will this happen if the coins doesn't have any piaring in fiat, yet. Will they bse the value on its ICO price? Certainly not. This will bankrupt the company.

FIAT, thats a bounty campain.
Whats that bounty is still live, i wanna join with that.
Now all my bounty all is nothink.
I wanna gwt a bounty and get a profit.
I need money to my life.

They use their shitty token to provide a bounty campaign reward because it costs them nothing and foreign spammers in third world countries can make the occasional large amount (for their country) by dumping the coin if it ever makes it to an exchange. Paying in fiat would require them to actually have to pay something instead of offering their irrelevant shitcoin they just made to scam people with.

Of course , if they paid this year in Fiat, there would be a lot of money from projects than if they paid with their tokens)

A time will come when bounty hunter will not be in a hurry to dump tokens soon after launch because  prices will grow rapidly after listing. That is usually the case in a bull market.

I've seen once that bounty rewards were paid in ETH.
They wanted to be honest with the people who steadily advertised their project for 4 weeks.
But that was because the project managers already knew that their token would lose 40% of its price due to the market drop which happened a month ago. 
Now I just can't imagine who would pay extra money in this sharp decline.

Hello, the reward a bounty hunter should except is not fiat but the token. However, what he get has a reward  from the bounty can be change to fiat. Note and understand very well that their nobody that can reward you with fiat. Finally, given you token is more profitable can the idea of fiat to reward. Your token can be 2x in days.

Yes, paying by fiat could be a good option since most hunters dump their coins after the ICO and thus it reduces the price of that coin. But teams will be short on funds for development if they pay using fiat instead of coins/tokens.

Its for hunting the bounty hunters:) and usually they hunt bounty hunters.
Manager will say the bounty pool is 1% so we have to re-calculate the pool etc etc. and same scenario will happen.

maybe if paying with fiat it requires a large amount of funds, especially if the participants have a very large amount. There is a risk of being paid with an ICO coin, which may be the price of the coin will fall, but I'm sure the team has other plans to deal with it.

the giving of the token in the bounty is also served as marketing. It also aims to market the product to existing ICO token on investors and also the wider community. Indeed for the results then the fiat will be preferred because it is more has a guarantee. but because the ins is also the marketing goals so naturally must be accepted however the result.

Ya true but that still kinda feels like a long way off. Hope I'm wrong...

I have not heard that yet! How do you imagine that? There are cases that projects pay a reward in ETH, so as not to affect the price of their own token, but not all bounty campaign participants liked it.

This could be great to have a fiat as a reward for your efforts in helping your chosen project to promote it. However, all projects will reject this proposal since they offer tokens because it's literally nothing, it's not even money and this is why there is a lot of different bounty campaigns

In my opinion that's the wrong logic.
Projects creates an ICO, because they don't have money.
They have an idea and maybe a product and give you the token.
The key is, be careful in the selection of your bounties ;-).

No ico will pay with fiat for bounty, because they have free tokens of their projects and no need to spend real money ,plus no one really knew how valuable tokens will be. I saw some paid in eth, its more realistic to prevent dumps doing this

The idea is noble, but it does not make sense for companies - they are engaged in translating Fiat investments into crypto currency, according to the path that you proposed, it makes no sense. Still there are many reasons, for example, for exchanges - they need to increase turnover. So besides ideological, there are also technical reasons.  ::) ::) ::)

Nobody will pay in fiat. There are some campaigns that are paying in bitcoin or ethereum, but not as much as i want. I cant even imagine how campaigns can prosess fiat payments for bounty.

Of course, after paying bounty hunters, they immediately sell all the coins, which causes a sharp drop. The company does not make sense to spend money on fiat to pay, because they, very often, do not care how much their coin costs about six months.

Fiat is not ever going to be possible, how do you pay with fiat? transfer to all the bounty hunter account numbers? it's not possible and achievable, you should have said to pay in eth or in btc, it will be understandable.

Good idea, but I do not think that the investor will agree with this. It seems to me that the investor does not want to give up the doken to the last when paying out, dragging the deadlines to the last. And money that tembolee, will not want

It would be better even if you paid with ETH instead of tokens. Fiat would be great! But if you advertise a project, then you believe in it, so you get the project tokens!

This is not feasible, paying with tokens is a problem for some team fiat will be when jesus come back second time before it will be paid to participants.

Sincerely, this is a very good and positive opinion, but you know what, i do not think it can happen. Everyone in this space is after coins. The only viable means of payment that i know us very much possible is in ethereum or btc, but eth is more likely.

i feel paying in etherum is worth considering for bounty hunters  etherum  and neo are worthy coins to consider to pay for bounty hunters

Well, we don't really want FIAT in our crypto world, but BTC we do - so the point is that rewarding Bounty hunters with BTC or ETH instead of their own tokens would be more appropriate.

Well, when the team give you the token, its nothing, those token is just what they can generated out of thin air.
When you need fiat, that mean cold hard cash, the money that they have to work hard to earn. What do you think they will give you?
Also, dumper is not as bad as it look. Those sell create volume for the coin.

Because perhaps they don't have that money? Let's remember that the reason they held an ICO is to collect a lot of money to start funding their project and also  it is a smart for them not to waste  their own money in case it fails. I like the idea but the ICO should have a generous investor right from the start to make it possible.

I think it's impossible, because they have their ico coins why they pay with fiat, it's the same they do not use coins and we can not make their coins have no sale value if they pay bounty with fiat. there are some projects that pay not to use their ico coins but with eth or btc, all depend on the concept of the developer.

I don't think it's possible :). Although bounty hunters also make price of token dump but I think it's not important because number of token which spent for bounty campaign is very low only about 1 or 2% of total supply amount so I think it'll not affect too much to price of token after listing on exchange, there are so many other reasons affect to price of token more than bounty hunter :))).

It really is ideal in the event that we get fiat rewards and extra of token supply that they are advancing. Be that as it may, I figure some abundance seekers needed to get more stakes/ICO token and hodl for long haul.

Although it would not be a bad idea for bounties to give fiat to avoid the dumpers, also the ICO developers have to be extremely confident in the development of their currency, since it would be a more expensive payment if the currency is not successful in the end, in the end money is money, so it makes no sense to give a reward or another, in the end, what matters is to receive it.

Totally impossible :). If they don't want their token price will be affected by bounty hunters so I think the best way is that stop running bounty campaign is much better than paying bounty hunter in fiat :). But how bounty hunter can affect that much to price of token while they only get small amount of token from bounty campaign only?? Don't blame for bounty hunter :)

I've never known a company that pays bounty hunters with FIAT
but if payment is using BTC or ETH, you can find out in sub forum: services, there will be a signature campaign that will pay you with BTC

good option but in every whitepaper there's no such opportunity. all developers buy in tokens because it's much more cheaper for them. and strong project can't be dumped because of some hunters which want fast money

This view is a bit funny. An ICO project comes out and issues its own Token, so they will definitely pay the bounty participant on that Token, not money because if they pay by cash will affect their capital. Paying with Token is not limited to money. If the potential ICOs are large, the number of Token will be very large, which is higher than the amount of cash they pay to the bounty participant.

But at times like this when bounty hunters dump their rewards right after they receive it, fiat rewards are ideal. Aside from they can't make the price drop below the ICO price, a big chance of price pump is expected especially if the project is really good. Don't worry about the team's capital because it is still just a small portion of the total ICO sales, commonly 2% only, not that big.

Your FIAT reward will be much less than ordinary bounty reward. It is ine of the reason why team decide to pay their tokens

ICO's ussually collect Bitcoin or Ethereum through their token sale, not fiat money. I think that it would be a very complicated proceduce for the team to send fiat money to bounty participants. It's much easier to send their coins as a reward, or maybe they could send Ethereum or Bitcoin for those who want so.

There's so much ideas that are coming to your mind.
These bounties will never pay you with fiat because they will pay you with their own created tokens that doesn't have value in the first place. It only gets value if its listed to an exchange.

I will really agree with this. But, I don't think that the ICO developer will do this. For, they will not take the risks and they want to grow their tokens through the bounty hunter. Some ICOs sometimes offer the Ethereum as the rewards for the bounty hunters to reduce the dump price.

I think that projects are not profitable to pay for generosity in cash. In addition, it is impossible within the framework of the ICO. A good project will not be at a loss from sales of generosity. And those projects that are not going to develop, it is even better for them to pay for their generosity with empty tokens.

Your Idea is great,  but I don't think so the developer of the ICO will agree with this proposal, because the developer has promoted their own product tokens and also the they support the digital money currency.

I think it would be a very complicated process for the team to send fiat money to reward the participants. Much easier to send their coins as gifts, or maybe they can send Ethereum or Bitcoin to those who want it.

I think its an awesome thought. That dumping by abundance seekers had been an issue to this Airdrop/abundance framework and furthermore to the ICO speculators so if the abundance seekers can be remunerated with Fiat then every one of these issues can be unraveled while continue benefiting the administrations of Bounty seekers for advancements and advertising stuff.

No can do.
Where do you think they will get that money from?
They are doing ICO to raise funds and they cannot just take it out once some investor came in and buy tokens from them.

They pay their own tokens for the purpose of spreading it also. Not all bounty hunters will sell, some of them will buy more. Why? They fell in love with the project by knowing more about it thru bounty. That is one good purpose of having a bounty also.
It aint just about the money.

na minha opiniao se o projeto for forte ele vai valoriza nao vai ser os caçadores de recompensa que vai derruba o projeto

The idea of receiving instant payments is a good one, but if the projects had money to pay bounty hunters then they might as well skip Ico.
Besides I dont think bounty hunters are responsible for price drop. It is the early buyers who are already in profit with Ico price and huge discounts that are responsible

the answer is very easy, because we are working on cryptocurrency then we will be paid with cryptocurrency and if bounty make the ICO price down it is wrong, because the allocation for bounty is only 0.5-5% and that is not possible with such a small allocation could make ICO price down .

Good question but have you ever thought where to send that? It takes time and more fees if rewards would be sent through fiat. And also it could be dangerous. But if we use digital wallet, it will take a short time to transfer and you can plan on what you are about to do with that, if you were to invest some part of it or withdraw. Also, if they sent you with the current price, you won't be able to hold it for you to gain more profit.

It is impossible for a team that will reward fiat money on the bounty hunters. As we all know that bounty hunters are coming around the world and we have different kinds of fiat currency. Thus, tokens will be able for the bounty hunters to exchange it for eth and bitcoin so as to exchange with fiat money in their local exchange. This is how bounty reward works best. And aside from that the team need the fiat not the token so probably token is the best reward to make for the bounty hunters.

Your thinking makes a lot of sense but the bounty hunters always have the worry about the future of the tokens that  acquire and many times, ideas come up like this: Receive the reward for FIAT. Volatility is always in the crypto market and is a state that we do not want to be affected for a long time.

Honestly the success or failure of a post ICO is not determined on whether bounty hunters dumped their coins it is actually determined by how good the project is, although massive dumping might lead to a drop in the price initially however a prosperous coin will surely pump later, so payment of hunters in fiat not really help in promoting the token.

And then you need to comply with a lot of restriction and regulation by use the fiat service for your payment. you need to see that from the legal view too. It's so easy to said those projects must created a fiat rewards to the bounty participants but it needs a lot of legal requirement to the project to do that.

Every time any ICO finishes and get listed on an exchange, we hear a lot of complaints that bounty hunters are dumping and the price is dropping because of that. I agree with the suggestion that to resolve this problem they should pay bounty hunters in ETH.

yep, I also think this thing like you! Some of bounties are locking tokens when ICO ended, but be very little. Because this thing will be not attracted participants on their program, so they accept the difficulty when their tokens is dumped by bounty hunters

The argument that bounty hunters dump all of their coins and thereby crash the exchange rates doesn't corroborate with the available market information. Most of the ICOs devote just 1% or 2% of the tokens for the bounty programs. If the prices can be manipulated with just 1% of the tokens, then I'd say that there is something wrong with the ICO.

This will only happen in your dreams mate,we know how scammy most of the project ico now so how would you expect them to pay us fiats when all they wanna do is have victimized investors and after gone with the wind.for the participants they will pay tokens that will available on their exchange that even if took a year will never had a value  .so expct nothing from them better choose the good project and hold the tokens until the dev pumped this

allocation for bounty hunter actually is not too big if compare with total token supply.but investor contribute to in this dumping especially whom joined in private sale that give huge discount.paying reward in eth or fiat could minimize massive dumping.

In fact, it would be very cool to receive payment in Fiat, but alas it's impossible

Bounty hunters need a great support to the project, that's why they pay using their tokens and the token market status will be active with them, paying them using fiat is not that easy since they funding 100 thousand of dollars for bounty its like giving away money that the investors invested on their project
The amount of reward is based on the project success its the bounty hunters decision if they sell it or not, there's is also instances that the coin price increase after a long run.

Well for self satisfaction for hunters its good, but for a project that is solid it won't have any effect because it will help to raise the volume of the coin on exchange and can also help the coin have good advertisement

well fiat rewards are not good at all, with the reward given with crypto currency this is currently help the coin to get a circulation in it, and that was benifit for the coin to being active after all, but well there is some mistake when people are dumping their token and make the price fall

team is not profitable to pay bounties hunters just fiat, because they sell ICO their tokens, it's easier for them to give.
Of course there are campaigns where pay out in bitcoin or ether at once, but, as a rule, there goes a small reward.

Paying in fiat it more unreal then paying in most popular eth or btc.
Some campaigns do btc payments but i think they win form it. Usually payments finally lower then on other campaigns

When the markets are down, people prefer payments which are less risky, such as BTC or ETH. Once the market recovers, more people may prefer rewards in the form of tokens.

Actually most of the projects don't have enough funds to rewards the hunters with money or bitcoin that is why they are doing it with tokens.Only some projects take the risks of paying the signature participants weekly in bitcoin and the chance of success of the projects are more than the bounties.

I think it could happen but I am sure the payment for prizes bounty campaign participants usually given with the number of fiat but in the form of tokens that are given from the founder of the ico.

Well, not sure how this would go or if the hunters would accept the fiat rewards in the first place, i  see no reason for rewards to be in fiat only for one to change Fiat into crypto once gain to get to buy the same crypto. here might be people however who might prefer this kind of arrangement, though i personally don't fancy it

Bounty is just another portions of advertising the project, it's needed to bring new investors and attract them to invest with the project and just like what you said everything is depend on how the developers develop the projects and if the said coins really have a good usage, though it can reflect to the value of the tokens when bounty dumped it but its just a small portion of it both fiat and tokens will not affect a good project if there's a real use after it has been fully developed.

Typically, the projects allocated to bounty a small percentage of the tokens. Therefore bounty hunters should not influence the price of the token. Not all bounty hunters immediately exchange their reward for FIAT.

ICO projects pay remuneration to bounty members in project tokens, because they believe that you support their project and the idea they realize. I also agree with the creators of ICO projects and also would pay remuneration in tokens.

Truly, in light of the fact that ICO is a pledge drive for venture usage. Numerous tasks don't have the cash to pay you. Since the venture isn't working yet. It requires investment for the undertaking to begin making a benefit.

It's basically impossible for projects to pay in fiat. There's so much regulation and compliance issues that it would take forever. Paying in crypto is still an infinite times easier than paying fiat.

The main feature of bounty companies in that bounty members get their payment in tokens, otherwise, it's not a bounty but just advertising

THis is a very good idea but I think the projects don't want to risk their own Ethereum and would rather give out their own fresh minted coins (with no value at the time).  Sometimes I think the projects like to cry when people cash in their work which seems like bad business.  If the project knows its going to dump they should BUY BACK and put their money where their mouth is. 

Yes, it's much more profitable for developers to give their tokens, which they pre-planned for delivery, than to share cash.

Giving bounty hunters the option to be paid in fiat currency is a good ideal but I do not think developers will want to do that. Paying in their tokens even if it will be dropped is much cheaper and more convenient for them. Fiat transactions have high transaction fees.

If you are interested in finding projects that pay rewards to participants of bounty campaigns with fiat money, then it seems to me that you will not find such. But you can take part in bounty campaigns of projects that pay remuneration in the top-level crypto currency - Ethereum - just look for those on the portal bounty0x, I'm currently participating in several such.

This topic can be looked at from different perspective, it's a good suggestion that bounty hunters be paid in fiat or ETH to prevent the most likely eventual dump of the tokens when distributed. Nevertheless it should be noted that some projects are highly hyped and bounty hunters actually feel lucky to be able to participate in the bounty as a way to get some tokens for themselves so it would be unfavorable for them to be paid in fiat.

 Think the point here is that, it would be more cost efficient for them if they pay with the tokens. Also, it would increase the value of the cryptocurrency.

This is a great idea.  This would for sure elevate all the issues projects have with hunters dumping.  I have a sneaking suspicion though that the projects will not want to pay using cold hard cash.

I think this is a great idea. Beneficial to both parties. The benefit is that it would be better for bounty hunter not dumping ICO

Hi, this is a good idea for the bounty hunters, the hunters will be rewarded and no need to care about token's price.

I think it is difficult to pay by ICO, but they can only pay by ETH and BTC. But with a very small pool for a few people

Hi, my friend, how you think if your reward token rises up the price, you have the opportunity to become rich? And if you only get the fiat, you safe, but don't have the opportunity to become rich!

Fiat rewards for bounty hunters will not happen, im quite sure about it. Main reason why this will not happen because ICOs can easily pay with free tokens they done themself and not investing fiat money into bounty campaings.

Hi guy, actually I found some bounties wit BTC payment. This option for high-level rank in bitcointalk, hero member above or you have so many followers in social media. If the new bounty have BTC and ETH payment, i fully agree with them.

Hi, I agree with you. bounty payment by fiat is a good idea but it is not feasible. I think payment in ETH or BTC is one of the best choices.

I am also a bounty hunter that makes sense too and I also agree with your opinion but where do they get the money while they also collect money from investors, or maybe by giving tokens later for bounty hunters so the price does not go down this is just my opinion

A very good idea, they can pay for the work of bounty hunters in ethereum, there will be no problems with the course of the token at the initial stage.

Some bounty managers regularly have bounty campaign with paying in BTC, usually these managers like Wapinter and others Legendary...

That's very good opinion. I would build the one part of the exchange with token/USD and then the other platforms to change it for other crypto. But I'm a little bit affraid that it wouldn't help at all, the price would be different and bounty hunter would still go there where it's for more money.

I think that it is impossible. Imagine how many problems will be there if we were paid in fiat money. Nobody knows you and in a classic world, everytime when you receive a salary government should know about it and also about you :D.

It seem to be a good idea. But, paying fiat for bounty rewards would take a lot of resources to pay for every bounty hunters. And the project is accepting mostly in cryptocurrency. It would be the best if lot of projects would pay in bitcoin and eth would be great.

Fiat payment is hardly an option of payments as ICO's are in business too. Paying in fiat is against the unwritten rules of the cryptocurrency industry. However, I think they can explore the option of paying in ETH as well.

Not fiat, but those coins in which the ICO takes for investment
Ethereum Bitcoin, etc.
This is often said at the forum recently. And this has its advantages for all parties, both for the ICO and for the Bounty of Hunters.
I would also like to see ESCROW in companies. Lately, too many scams.

In my own opinion, it was normal for the price of the ico tokens to drop after it was released in the market because the growth of the coin will always be depending on the platform.

As a rule, bounty rewards amount only to 0,5-2% of overall issued tokens. Do you really think it will influence much a coin's price? Hardly. Yes, hunters very often dump the coins as soon as they get them, and it causes a short-term drop, but then the price recovers. Besides there are a lot of bounty hunters who choose to hodl just like investors. That's why it will remain more preferable to pay with crypto, besides not all the projects can afford to pay in fiat.

The idea sounds logical but in reality, it can't be done that way and the reason is that bounty hunters are a part of the ICO buyers in the sense that they pay for their token through the services they rendered through bounty campaigns. So it is impossible to pay them in Fiat.

It is a good way but not feasible. The main problem is that ICOs don't have too much cash to pay for the bounty hunter. Projects don't have enough money to continue, so they raise fund through ICOs. If they have to spend a great amount of money for bounty campaign, that isn't good for them.

This is very good opinion and I think it should be followed. That will help to the project as well as investors and bountyhunters.but I don't think that project manager will not be follow this as if project fails they have to pay it from their pocket otherwise they always give the coin.

that's a good idea but selfish at the same time, since we bounty hunters are promoting the ICO or project it would be better to receive the token of the project itself. It's just normal nowadays that hunters are dumping the price since they don't fully support the project.

Even so many peoples say bounty hunters dump coin how that's possible because of no ICO distribute more than 5% for bounty hunters. Usually its 2% or 3% of total allocation so it's hard to do such a thing.

I disagree with you,  just take a good survey at some of the bounties projects, they dumped after listing and only rise up quickly if it's a solid project

Yes fiat for bounty hunters is a good idea it could benefect both bounty hunters and investors.

Getting a reward in tokens might be more profitable because you never know how many X this coin will make.
Over the past several months I kept a number of bounty tokens in my wallet worth around $50, but today they were pumped and sold at a price like 11 times higher.
Isn't that more pleasurable than getting a fiat reward?  ;)

That's good thinking. Would be great if bounty hunters could choose whether to receive they prize in FIAT or crypto but then again, imagine sending FIAT all over the world to bounty hunter, I think that would be just pain... It's definetly easier to pay in crypto.

Ico's are offerings of shares in order to raise Capitol for building a business from the ground up. In an initial coin offering, shares of a company's token, or coin etc, are offered instead of fiat because of the next to nothing cost of the initial startup.
   It's's easier to give digital coins away that are made up from lines of code, than to just hand over hard earned cash to pay bounty campaigners.
    At the time of inception, new coins and tokens have little to no instrinic value, because without a market availabe, the coin has no life on the trading block, at least until it becomes an active coin.

Well. I've met several times BBB- buy back bounties, which obligated to make payout in ETH or BTC instead of tokens.
this action should prevent massive dump and I am really in favour of this

The idea is good, some projects do this, but the problem not everyone has fiat. And all the funds collected in ICO, they are spend to develop.

I do not agree with this insertion.Tell me if you were a project team member ,will you be willing to give someone money who do not believe in your project Am saying so because giving hunters fiat means that the hunters do not believe in the project they are working for and this could also be disastrous for the project.Another issue I have here is that ,it is not only bounty hunters that dump the coin because sometimes ,private sale investors do dump a coin at exchange because of the huge bonuses that they get from the ICO.There are projects that did not give hunters tokens yet the price dump.

Very nice suggestion from you, no doubt that bounty hunter kill a project immediately they get paid, but your suggestion will cub every issue arising from it, those who need fiat will have it, and those who wish to get the token may also have it. If this can be done it's will definitely be a good action.

I think it never happend to an ended ICO to give paid fiat money instead of token to the bounty hunters because it choose to prefer token payments due to big difference when tokens are more profitable to double or tripple the token sold.

The intention of making an ICO and raising funds to finance the project. In this process many currencies pay in their own tokens to save what is scarce, then paying in cash would not make much sense.

The idea is okay, but in most cases you probably see that FIAT -> crypto migration because many bounty hunters just not want to hold fiat money and even if they need fiat money for something, they can just exchange crypto to it.

This is great idea to protect investor from dumped price of token, but this is can be reality if the team member want to protect their investor. So far i have seen only few little bit project paid the bounty reward by ETH. But payment of bounty with fiat or stable coin like USDT/TUSD/DAI is more better idea to avoid loss value of reward from high volatility.

Pay for the services of bounty hunters in fiat currency is absolutely not realistic. Even if we assume that everyone agrees, how to do it in practice. Give bank card numbers from around the world? So in them it is possible to get confused very easily. Then practically with each participant there will be a problem. To that a large part of the ICO projects are fraudulent. We will still give them the numbers of their bank cards and our names and names at least. No, better let them be tokens. So safer and safer.

It's not a bad idea, although I think it's more convenient for investors to continue paying in tokens than in fiat directly, although if it would solve the problem that you mention that it's the dump that barely comes out in exchange, remember that bounty hunters can also be investors and many participate to get good pre-ICO tokens that their value is much lower but can reach a much higher value.

Oh, that would be something to be seen for sure, but ICOs normally want to have everyone speaking well of the project so tokens are better for that.

This idea doesn't make any sense. Because it's not profitable for the project team and they would never agree to pay bounty hunters Fiat money. In this case, they could buy advertising for this money and be sure that it will definitely lead new investors. And bounty is word of mouth and doesn't do enough good to pay Fiat money for it.

 Yes it would be great if that happens we can directly get our tokens/rewards in our wallets or we can withdraw it automatically our rewards so that is very much easy to use our fiats.,but i think that is impossible to happens everything has the reason why it cannot be happen ico's and the trading part is very much needed.

That would never happen. The fiat payment were surely alloted only for the team of the project which is the devs, the marketing dept and other related to it. Our job is not that also hard and it is not considered as a profession so it just suits that they pay us their tokens.

For ICO, it would be a big problem to pay bounty hunters in fiat. Where would they have money for it if they were just collecting it for the project? Who and where to send money? Additional fees for sending in various parts of the world. Bounty hunters work in the world of cryptocurrencies and receive a reward here.

I totally agree, like this is a whole idea of bounty campaigns - to use the funds in tokens not in percent of raised funds. But for bounty hunters - really good idea because of some sort of 'fixed income' in FIAT.

The are two type of bounty hunter. First, is people which sell their token immediately or exchange to ETH because of many reason. The number two is people which hope that their token from bounty can got better price or even rocket to the moon. I think that FIAT reward are suitable for type one but some people too want to hold their token too. Also there is only few bounty that really paid with FIAT.

I very rarely go to projects that offer dollars during the company's Bounty, not steaks, as in other cases. Such company bounties give me confidence.

I am very thankful that I can earn atleast tokens. Some of them are even better than Fiat. And what do you know, in the future, no FIAT, only crypto?
So dont hate bounty tokens and try to love them  8).

That's great. Of course, companies can't allow that . But there's definitely something to think about.

Not only bounty hunters can dump the price, but also investors who bought coins on Private Sale, so it's better not to say that the fault is just bounty hunters, it's not, they do not have such a large percentage of coins from the total sale.

Honestly, I have not seen projects where they would have paid dollars. Most often, they pay either by a common coin (Ether for example) or tokens of the project itself, because Payment in dollars is not very expensive for any developer and causes a lot of questions from the holders of securities.

It would be good if the ICO projects would pay to bounty participants with fiat money. But I think for them it is easier to pay with tokens than Fiat, because if they do so, in fact it is the investors who are paying to bounty participants, because those tokens influents on the token price, and reduce investors income.

Bounty allocations are usually 1% or max 2% of total supply. I am sure not all hunters dump their tokens, but even if it happens with 1 % they cannot make too much damage and it would be not affecting the project long term.
We are here in Crypto as we believe in decentralised payment solutions and want to get rid of Fiat if possible.

This is not a bad idea because usually price decreases after ICO. It would be nice if they paid in Bitcoin or Ethereum every week.

for the bounty hunters, I haven't seen using FIAT, it's just FIAT to purchase the personal token, so we only accept payment in the project token.

If that will happen I'm surely double my efforts on Bounty and all aspect of it, but it is totally impossible. If they don't want their token price will be affected by bounty hunters so I think the best way is that stop running bounty campaign is much better than paying bounty hunter in fiat. But I'm hoping that it would happen in the future? maybe. haha

The fact is that everyone knows that claim is not always true. There have been situations where the investors always dump their own coins. Look at the market situation currently, almost every coin trades at below ICO and surprisingly they are all initially set by investors.

Paying bounty hunters with FIAT is like taking from the money they got from ICO. Most ICOs chose to pay with their token because they don't want to start disbursing ICO fund anyhow. By so doing they prefer to pay with tokens rather than giving FIAT for bounty reward.

I think that for bounty hunters there are different criteria and personally for me the biggest reward was 800 dollars for the company.

It is obviously very different and that is also influenced by the differences in rankings in this forum, as long as I take part in the bounty from last year I always get projects that do not pay so I have not felt the beauty of salaries from bounty hunters, but I remain optimistic and someday surely I can manage to earn more than $ 5000.

Your assumption is wrong. Bounty hunters can increase the liquidity of their COINS by selling them. I don't think it's a bad thing for them to abandon COINS.

I don't that the dev will give fiat rewards for bounty hunters because it is better to give bounty hunters with their token so the bounty hunters can sell the token to get ethereum coins. I think the dev and the team convert the fiat to ethereum and their token and still keep the fiat for urgent situations that they might get in the future.

It depends on the ico project allocations, but most of the time in my experienced, it is only a rare coincidence, when the ico bounty rewards bounty hunter with a fiat rather than its crypto currency. We can assume that the team have some funds for some fiat, but it is only seen rare these days, almost all ico that is hosting bounty campaign, rewards bounty hunters their own designated cryptocurrency.

That does not say but the bountyhunter[/ftp][/ftp][/ftp] is one of the best platforms)) And it is not that no match)https://bountyhunters.io

That won't stop coin from dumping in some cased dump is common in current market condition, i have seen project where hunters are yet to be paid and token have dumped beyond repair. When market recover fully, either hunter hunter are paid with token so far there is a lot of demand price won't dump.

If pay bounty hunters fiat, then it will be just a job. And in general, it contradicts the concept of bounty. Because the community is working for the benefit of the coin, it is its adherents and holders.

This will never happen. Bounty campaigns do not greatly help projects, they will not give dollars for participation in them.

Interesting idea, but are they willing to do it? What's the purpose of decentralization using blockchain technology? Why not use bitcoin or ethereum instead of Fiat?btw, I already experienced receiving eth for a certain airdrop. But as far as I know, there is only little percentage of tokens allotted to bounty hunters compared to sold in ICOs. Maybe you should also start considering there are also those who bought in the  private sale and presale with huge discounts. Most of the times, they are the reason of the dump in my own opinion.

Yes, paying by fiat could be a good option since most hunters dump their coins after the ICO and thus it reduces the price of that coin. But teams will be short on funds for development if they pay using fiat instead of coins/tokens.

I would say rewards tokens bloggers usually  may consider keeping adequate new coins , yet when that project feels like insuffucient they abandon promptly to hold reasonable gains. Else people could not abandon more often.

I'm thinking that getting a reward in the crypt is not a hindrance. After all, turning a crypt into a Fiat will be only 10-15 minutes.

it can't be like that because if it's like that it's better you just work in a real job, sonoth ny:
drink merchants, shopkeepers and work as doctors etc.

Prize hunters are given bounty tokens because Adia has successfully marketed the token by way of ICO, if it is paid with FIAT, it's just the same as lying.

Not bad idea but companies won't do it. Bounty is not only about paying for job, its about branding. When they are paying with their tokens, it also works for branding. No reason to reward with fiat when they can pay with tokens.

The projects try to raise fiat from ICO as you said. If they do pay to this bounties hunters the rewards as money it will be a big chunk from the team though and will not be really for them

I think getting rewards with fiat is a good solution for bounty hunters but the problem is we don't know if the dev wants to convert the rewards into fiat. but I guess they don't want to do this because their token will not spread among the people and they cannot continue the project because they can run out of the money. the purposes they collecting fiat are they need fiat to develop the projects and maybe they need to buy some hardware to help the projects become a success.

Because they do ICO to get Fiat to run their project. If they use Fiat to reward for bounty hunters, this is not really wise doing because their tokens are totally free charge for them

Projects allocated to bounty a small percentage of the tokens. Therefore bounty hunters should not influence the price of the token. Not all bounty hunters immediately exchange their reward for fiat. The right strategy is to wait for growth.

yes, not sure how this would go or if the hunters would accept the fiat rewards in the first place, I see no reason for rewards to be in fiat only for one to change Fiat into crypto once gain to get to buy the same crypto. here might be people however who might prefer this kind of arrangement, though I personally don't fancy it.

Well for self satisfaction for hunters its good, but for a project that is solid it won't have any effect because it will help to raise the volume of the coin on exchange and can also help the coin have good advertisement.
But at the start of sales it can also play a cruel joke, if the volumes will be too small, then a large amount of bounty hunters will collapse the rate

for me its good for bounty hunters, but for a project it wont. initial coin offering is one way to test the project if its good or not and if we just look at bounty hunters cannot drop the coin as much as they can because the total allocation for the bounty is very small. the dump of an coin is really depends on the investors, sometimes investors are get panic also that the price will dump after bounty Hunters sell there tokens and they will sell also.

This is a good suggestion and i wished it would be imbibed and adhered to amd with that there won't be any issue or complaints about bounty hunters dumping their tokens. I have also seen projects that at first would pay their bounty hunters with tokens and will alongside be given the option of selling the tokens directly back to the ICO team at the ICO price if they agree with it. They will then be paid in either eth or btc and not in FIAT.

I think best solution is to give bounty hunters a choise to get rewards in project coins or in currencies used for ICO. because I believe that some really good project coins will be much more expencive right after listing on exchanges and some bounty hunter really support the project, not only for reward, but for idea.

I don't think so. If the project wants to avoid dumping the coin/token price, there is already an alternative way to pay bounty hunters, using Bitcoin or Ethereum (even though it depends on the terms and conditions of the project). Therefore, payment using FIAT to bounty hunters will never happen.

Bounty is only supported by Tokens or popular altcoins. I have not seem any anyone given FIAT reward for doing participation in bounty.
Even now a days we can find some good project pays in ETH value or buy back their tokens after end of ICO.

that is a comment, but they need to distribute tokens so that bounty hunters can trade purpose is to increase the activity of money in the market, create the interest of public opinion

But the fact is that bounty hunters do not discount the price of a coin and that's why they do not think so and accuse them of having too few of them to drop the price.

You into crypto why would you want to get fiat, I think the reward is coin or ETH in BTC,that is the most reasonable

THis is a smart thought yet I figure the undertakings would prefer not to chance their own particular Ethereum and would rather give out their own new printed coins (with no incentive at the time). Now and then I think the activities get a kick out of the chance to cry when individuals trade out their work which appears terrible business. On the off chance that the undertaking knows it will dump they should BUY BACK and put their cash where their mouth is.

While project markers do not appear on the exchange, they do not have a price. Companies collect money in exchange for incomprehensible tokens, it is not profitable for them to pay traditional money that has value.

What do you mean by fiat? is it dollar or other cryptocurrency like bitcoin and ETH? Actually there are 1-2 bounties in the past that using ETH for the payment but bounties like that is rarely to see nowdays. In my opinion, i'm okay with both payments.

If you want to earn FIAA income then you just work in a job that is in your country.
This is Cryptocurrency, so it's all based on cryptocurrency.

If you pay with FIAT or Kamapnye bounty, then the token in the ICO will not sell in the market.

I think bounty campaigns are also a way of giving away their tokens to the public, while also paying for promotion on your project.

It is anything but a terrible thought, in spite of the fact that I believe it's more advantageous for financial specialists to keep paying in tokens than in fiat straightforwardly, in spite of the fact that in the event that it would take care of the issue that you specify that the landfill scarcely turns out in return, recollect that abundance seekers can likewise be speculators and many partake to get great pre-ICO tokens that their esteem is much lower however can achieve a substantially higher esteem.

I agree with you that bounty hunters know more about ICO than ordinary investors. They know clearly which ico is true, so they will have their own choices after winning the prize. if they think there is a potential token, as a qualified bounty hunter will not easily lose it.

They don't have FIAT to pay bounty hunters, that's the problem. The point of ICO to raise FIAT for their project. I doubt the one leading ICO want to make their own token not adopted by using FIAT to pay for bounty.

You have a good and partly correct opinion, but not all so. If the bounties are paid for by real money, this is also unprofitable for the ISO team, because they are collecting money for the development and promotion of the project. None of the projects will want to do this  ;)

Fiat won't be paid for bounty hunters. Almost every bounty used to pay in terms of their own respective tokens. The tokens can be converted to fiat after it gets listed to the exchanges. This is a long process, for which the token need to be converted to bitcoin or ethereum and then needs to be cashed out.

FIAT rewards for bounty hunters is not suitable for this kind of industry. The ICO who conducted the project would not probably agree with this. Fiat has its fixed value unlike tokens which are unpredictable. 

After all the tradition of paying a bounty hunter with altcoins is something that has happened from the past and that can't be changed quickly. It would be good if bounty hunter get rewards in fiat, but then a project have additional point in do that. Like, increase the volume of trading activity.

I also have problem with listing on stock exchanges. I have coins that have not appeared and are unlikely to get there already. And with every month there are more and more such tokens..

The idea is very good, but very few cryptocurrency creators will agree with such conditions. Organizations also raise funds to complete their projects, they provide payments to all teams that work for them with their coins.

they wont do it, because not all bounty hunters dump the coin after receiving there are still someone who holds them. They need to spread their coin to numerous people so that if they do exchange it there will be a volume in the coin's exchange.

Bounty hunters are really cause of dumping the token because once they get their bounty reward they sell it so the bounty dump. I don't think if the bounty reward is fiat it's not called bounty anymore. Depends to the bounty hunters if they want to sell their token to get fiat or still holding their token.

I do not think that the projects will go for this. They are collecting very little money. So the maximum that we can get is their coins.

This may be a good idea. The dump price of the tokens can make investors lose confidence. This way is to prevent that.
Another way that can be used by the dev to prevent dump is by buyback their tokens that sold with cheap price.

Your offer is very good, but you did not take into account one thing - no one is absolutely don't care about the bounty hunters. We are a cheap labor force, which is often paid with tokens for two months of work, which cost almost nothing. The situation is critical, but there is nothing we can to do.

Of course, in general, it would not be bad to receive money in Fiat or, for example, in official crypto-currencies, but now it seems to me that crypto-currencies are of great value, will have value after the market starts moving up again.

In the one hand, it is a good idea, because bounty hunters always dump their coins immediately. But on the other hand, it isn`t a nice idea because FIAT rewards will decrease amount of money for implementation of the projects.

I think no one would object if the projects were paid bitcoins for participating in bounty campaigns. Because here the adherents of cryptography gathered mainly.

I think that would not be such a good idea to use the money from their pocket or money from hard cap. Because volume is increasing that way and they bring investors also by giving their coins. Better this way for sure.

very true and that will make the ico development team not happy with the route they took to raise capital

because ico teams do not have fiat. that is why they launch an ico. they need money to launch their project. so there is no way to distibute fiat to bounty participants. moreover i dont think they would like to spend fiat for bounties even if they have cash.

Paying bounty hunters by Fiat and crypto has both its pros and cons. If you pay by crypto then bounty hunters will dump and thus reduce the price of the coin and if they are paid by Fiat, it could burn a big hole in cash reserves of the company and thus affect development.

     Both of these two option are good opportunity for the bounty hunter either paid by fiat or to be rewarded by tokens and both of these two can also be a negative impact to the ICO depending on how this will be manage by the bounty hunter, like for example if the tokens rewarded will be dump after ICO, so this will be causing a price diminishing and if they wants to pay in fiat, so they need more capital allocation for bounty hunters without an assurance the success of the project.

I still remember those times when they did not even pay tokens which they did not even have on the stock exchange, but by bitcoin. I think they are the most reliable campaigns. it seems to me that there are no more such campaigns.

Exactly my perspective. Thou a good suggestion, believe me, many of these project barely made past the softcap stage. Payment with fiat will definitely ruin many of them straight up. I don't see feasible even in the long run. Cos many of them believe in giving people what they sell to improve the growth of their product's users.

If paid in Fiat I think bounty hunters would get rich quick in this forum) , and the project is not profitable to pay from his pocket it is easier to give tokens

Bounty campaign is made in order to advertise the ICO and their tokens, and if you would like to get the fiat for the promotion, you may develop your own blog and creators of the project will personally contact you and will pay you in fiat.

If you wanted fiat instead of tokens, maybe you should aim for a higher task. Try to become a bounty manager and not a bounty hunter. Most, if not all, bounty managers get paid in fiat.

They created the ICO because they had no capital to carry out their project. Therefore they can not pay by FIAT to bounty hunters. If they can pay by FIAT then that is a great thing for bounty hunters

I would like to be rewarded in fiat, I think it is the best thing for bounty hunters, but that means more investment from part of the ICO team, so it may be quite difficult to archieve.

There is no how you can expect Fiat money for Bounty rewards because Fiats globally are not uniform and even where it is possible probably USD,  you have analyzed it as well, Developers are raising their Tokens/Coins for money. All is well.

I'd say your point is a notable one... But I highly doubt bounty hunters can dump a solid project with unique products. As a matter of fact tokens allocated for bounties (most) shouldn't drop the price of a token as more % are allocated to sales.

the idea of having a coin attached to the project is the brain behind the ICO in the first place so giving it away is not a good one.

It can't be possible.
They prefer to take risks by letting the bounty hunters get a share of their coins. There is no guarantee that they will reach a price equivalent to USD with their tokens which is why they give it that way.

Guys, what do you smoke here?

Crypto is an anonymous asset! While transactions can be tracked, the end wallet owner stays anonymous.
Now tell me where do you expect to get the bounty reward?
To your credit card, to your bank account or may be in cash?   :D

From time to time there are bounties that pay in ETH or BTC, but never in fiat.

Because they dont care about investors money...the majority if ico's want just to grave money from investors

I disagree totally with the proposition because it goes entirely against the ideals of the decentralization movement. Projects can decide to pay out this rewards in ethereum bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency accepted during the token sale if they are worried about people dumping their tokens.
That is a better approach because anonymity should not be compromised because of a few tokens.

i think it's not possible, because ICO-s want to raise money with bounty campaign and not give "real" money for it.

I would place the developers were paid in ETH. Or bought moments from hunters who don't want to keep them. But there is a point. A certain amount of coins on the marketing, and the bounty so they need to distribute

It is a great news if bounty hunters are rewarded fiat, not tokens or coins because the they do not need to convert the reward to fiat. However, it against the foundations of decentralization of Cryptocurencies. Most people are prefer to get coins or takens rather than fiat even thought fiat is simpler transaction than coins.

I like getting the token of the project I'm promoting.  This would also be much more risky to the project.  If it failed the owners of the project would be out all of their money.  I doubt we will see this happen but anything is possible. 

Fiat rewards is impossible because they raise fiat. Tokens rewards are free. they create tokens value 1 million uSD and shared to members. That's easy and less cost. Giving away or airdrop are a way to promote ICO for free. How much money to promote via twitter with thousands participants and twitting eveyday? It is costly you know, writing on blog are not free and costly if ICO pay bounty with fiat. No guarantee ICO succesful they lost a lot of money. Giving tokens are a way to build community. No matter bounty hunters sell at low price. Low price is not becuase bounty hunters only but also the project it self. If the project potential to make profit the price will increase. You know that some ICO pay with btc or eth? Not shares the tokens, The price is still under ICO price in the market. Bounty hunters not more than 5 % effect to the price.

What you've said is very god. But the issue is that what they need at the moment is fiat. This is the capital they work with. They have enough tokens with them. Something better might be that they pay in bitcoins or ether if they wan to avoid their token dump.

I don't think it's a good idea. Beside, you should know that number of token shared for bounty hunters is really low so bounty hunters can't do anything to affect so much to price of token so I think it's no need to pay fiat directly for bounty hunters and you should stop blaming bounty hunter :).

I also want to get fiat. But the reality is hard to do, because they do not want to pay for the bounty hunters, they just want to pay by their product, if their project is good, they will buy it, project bad, they also Will dump like bounty hunters and die project

Fiat is good but really expensive and clumsy to pay in. The reason why cryptocurrencies was launched in the first instance.

In my own opinion, it will never happen because rewarding fiats or real money are too much risky for the companies. I meaned in their side, they don't have assuranced and sure that their project will be successful. And if they can be able to collect enough funds, they will used it in the development process so that they can implement their project.

What? Most ICOs nowadays accept ETH, BTC, and even USD. Part of the raised ETH and BTC can be sold to USD to have that FIAT needed. Well, personally, I'm good with being paid with ETH or BTC.

Actually, community program promoters most times might get to avoid dumping interesting iCOs , although when one offering can be forgetful they run promptly to preserve a little amount of profit. Else these need to keep usually.

Your opinion is not that bad. But also don't forget that the Fiat you want to use in paying the bounty hunters are from the sales to others. The team are always looking for a way to put the tokens in the hands of people as much as possible not just keeping it in their smart contracts.

I wonder which business minded person will do this. Anyway, I share a different idea when it comes to dumping after ICO. I dont think bounty hunters are to blame for that because some projects even hold on to bounty hunter's share but the coin will still drop in value.

The essence of promoting a particular project will be gone. Bounty hunters has a huge role because that is their means of investing to supoort a certain project. Although there are bounty hunters who do always dump the tokens, fiat cannot be the medium of payment  in bountied because it would appesr to be ironic. We should rather encourage bounty hunters to hold thsn to make changes regatding with the rewards thst the particioants will earn.

Special payments for bounty hunters are better to use FIAT or ETH or BTC because if the payment using tokens will cause the token price when the list in exchange will drop because many bounty hunters sell their tokens below the ICO price

This is absolutely true, i have been saying this and i keep telling my friends, bounty hunters do not and can not bring down the price of any project that is build on a solid foundation. What they do most times is they (the project team and investors) buy back once some hunters start selling their tokens and few days after they create a strong buy wall and they automatically push the prices up and in some cases even higher than the ICO price. Hence, investors will then smile again. Please let always correct and understand this.

You are certainly it far from the truth, but will it be adopted that we don't know. Let's hope for the best and keep working as we play a vital role in the crypto space.

I would prefer if the bounty awards to bounty hunters were paid in the etherium at the prices of the ICO. Payment in Fiat is too time-consuming and will only increase the share of fiat.

I don't think that giving bounty hunters their rewards in fiat is wise, we are in the crypto market so there is no need for us to be using fiat to pay out bounties. Also one of the purposes of bounties is to get awareness out there about the coin and to get as many people as possible involved in the coin so that is why they pay out in their tokens, making you involved in the coin.

well said dude! Practically these developers are looking for funds that's why they lauched their own ICO to raise its funds from scratch. Most of the ICO start ups with little to no fund just an idea alone so its basically no chance for them to give fiat money as payments for the bounty participants.

That will really benefit all parties, it could even encourage bounty hunter to purchase some tokens during and after the campaigns.

whether fiats or ethereum, they both nice, the idea is that you get our reward in something other than the bounty tokens and therefore not dump it on exchange

Paying for a bounty member using FIAT instead of Token will directly affect the finances of that project. And this is the cryptocurrency market so if ICO pay by cash it will be challenging for members to be able to exchange to other cryptos. Therefore, payouts with cryptos are the right thing to do and in line with the market's criteria.

It is only useful for bounty hunters. The ICO will lose money if FIAT payments are made to bounty hunters.
You say the bounty hunters will use that money to buy the tokens? I think no one will buy it. The bounty hunter needs money. And if they have money they will leave the project, That's for sure

It's not a good, idea to earn fiat as we participate in bounties because there's no fluctuation in market and we can't expect higher profits ,If bounty project distribute high rewards then it is good to earn fiat but if the rewards not much higher then it is necessary that people will not able to participate.

Fiat is not an option as we are in Crypto for different reasons to get rid from fiat, but BTC or ETH would have sense. Bounty payouts are usually 1% of total supply so they hardly can effect anything long term.

On the one hand, it would be nice for me to receive payment in Fiat, do not have to follow the listing of the received coin, get nervous, giving it to the stock exchange. On the other hand, payment in Fiat will be at a fixed price, if the coin is promising it can significantly increase in price and then I would be upset if I get a minimum payment.

I think the main reason for each ICO team to pay bounty with their coins is not with Fiat because we work in the cryptocurrency world so the payment must use crypto currency too, because if the payment use FIAT then I'm sure the cryptocurrency can't survive very long.

Fiat rewards should be made in order to distribute the rewards without dependency to the volatility of the market, bounty campaigns need to be looked as a side job from now on with workers that need to be paid on time.

Its not really a welcome idea if you ask me.

If bounties will be paid by Fiat money, then the true essence of crypto is useless. That is why we are promoting crypto because we want to use crypto in all aspect. If we accept payment other than crypto, then it's useless to advertise crypto. I know it is convenient, but I don't want to get paid in fiat.

Because when they are paying for the work of bounty hunters with tokens, they do not need to put information to the accounts department, as they would have had to do if they had paid with usual money.(IMO) In addition, the more people trade tokens, the greater the volume of trades and, accordingly, the interest in the coin. The trouble is not in the bounty hunters, but in the state of the market. In the bull market, dump of tokens by bounty hunters would not even be noticeable.

What's the point of being in a crypto if you only want Fiat. Bounty campaign is not a guarantee that their project will be successful so having their coins as a reward for bounty is a better option than giving Fiat directly to bounty hunters.

it can be a good idea. Currently there are many projects paid by ETH in BTC, as bookiepro, ... But public money will pay less :)

This is a good idea but not all people who take part in the bounty can receive FIAT because they are different countries maybe and it is very rare that FIAT is given because the funds from ICO might be to build a future project, but there is a project that gives ETH as a reward but I prefer receive tokens, who knows the tokens will fly high?

if the team pays bounty with fiat I have never heard of it but with bitcoin I often see bounty programs that pay with bitcoin.
how can the developer pay you with FIAT because obviously your personal data will be requested to send FIAT.
and this is clearly contrary to the purpose in creating crypto.

Rewarding bounty hunters with Fiat will be a good idea to me, this is because sometimes we receive a reward that is meant to be $10 worth of the token, but by the time we are ready to sell it must have dumped to $2 or less.  If the reward was paid in fiat it would have been the $10.

It would be nice if the projects gave a fixed percentage in Ethereum or Bitcoin to bounty hunters.But I do not think that this will ever happen, we play not such an important role for them.

Yes you suggest a good idea to avoid the dumping of ICOs coins and that way investor will also get benefited they will not fear of loss of value of their coins those who really interested in their projects they can buy coins from the fiat money they received as a bounty reward. I think If all this implemented ICOs demand will increase again. But in my opinion practically its not possible to distribute fiat money that will cost much so they avoid to pay in fiat.

While it may sound like a good idea and all of that, and what majority of us bounty hunters might want, I don't think that there is a possibility for that to happen to be more realistic. The thing is that tokens are usually distributed instead of these fiats so as to promote the tokens themselves and giving out fiat will not be fulfilling this purpose.

i think that it's better for the ICO-s to give out their tokens/coin. I don't think that it will ever happen that bounty hunters get FIAT for reward.

well, first of all how do you propose to transfer the fiat around the world? second of all, every ico/ito had budget percentage for bounty hunter from tokensale. so how'd you can count if they didn't on the market yet?

The part that is distributed for the bounty of the companies is insignificant, but those who participate in the presale stage receive a bonus of 40-50%. It is precisely these participants that are ruining the price.

I do not know how it might look. By and large, this is not profitable for projects, because they pay compensation-their own tokens, which for them have no value. But payments for generosity in ETH or BTC will not be bad.

THis is a smart thought yet I figure the activities would prefer not to hazard their own particular Ethereum and would rather give out their own crisp stamped coins with no incentive at the time. Here and there I think the undertakings get a kick out of the chance to cry when individuals trade out their work which appears awful business. On the off chance that the undertaking knows it will dump they should BUY BACK. Giving abundance seekers the choice to be paid in fiat money is a decent perfect yet I don't figure engineers will need to do that.

This will never happen. The team itself has no reason to pay hunters in fiat. It's one thing to give tokens that are unknown how much they will cost, and quite another to give real money. The maximum that you can expect is to receive the award in ETH or BTC. No one will give you normal money.