Bitcoin Forum

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

All of you correctly do, and it's necessary to work in this sphere. But the team of the project - is his representing person, you will look through unwillingly who is developers of this or that projects. And in general it is necessary to pay attention to the road map of the project, design of the website, white paper, a platform essence.

First Of All You need to research about that bounty project and their team and second see their roadmap total coin supply and all then choose their bounty. It is help you to choose good bounties.

In this thread, there was a topic of how the members of the projects turned out to be false, here's the proof that you need to analyze the project completely.

if you're talking about specifically judging bounties, you could try and check the bounty manager's history. is it a completely new person? is he from the project itself?
so many bounties seem to be based on nothing but 'good words' and eventually never pay out.

if you're joining a bounty that's been going for at least a week, check the spreadsheets, ensure that someone is keeping track and updating it regularly.

but if you mean generally how to determine if the project is good, you can look in this thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3760625) :)

The current scenario after the crowd sale only find the right project because white paper, Road map and developing team all are good but project worth is important thing in this scenario because they have some criteria once it will reach the expected sale this will continue in market. So bounty is hard to predict in this scenario.

So, to judge whether the reward thread is good or bad is to judge whether the ICO project is good or bad.
More attention should be paid to open source. ;D

A large number of subscribers on Twitter or telegram does not provide any advantage. The idea of the project is much more important. Of course, it is important that the accounts of developers were not fake. Participation of the team in summits and conferences will be a good indicator

A good bounty is any bounty that is not a scam. This is not something new. A lot of projects fail because of a very bad project or it could also be a scam. All those things that you said could be an indicator of a good or bad bounty. You really have to be very careful.

Sometimes a project may have all that you have stated, good team, a whitepaper, a secured website but will still fail at the end. These features are good to consider though, but the idea behind the project is also important. Is the idea really good? Do you think people and other investors will be interested? These are some questions I do ask myself.

Normally you can find the white paper in the ICO link of the website itself mate but along with that you can find the technical paper also in the the website bro. Those project you can able to analyze it easily how the technically it can go correct.

Please review about the ICO projects with the team information, from which manager handing the bounty program and finally who are all in developer team that is what you need to look on it mate.

Even if the project has enough followers, so it might be a scam, so most of the time I will eradicate the development progress of the project to determine the project, however this is not all judgment standard.

I totally agree with you. However, team members play an important role in the project's prospects. They can have good connections for example.

I think the team members is one of the most important thing, I'll be more concerned about the degree of team, because only an excellent team can make the development of the project is more outstanding, so our tokens, worthwhile.

I think that the most important thing to judge the bounty is to check the resume of the main members of the team. The second is to check the activity of the community and then check the feasibility of the white paper. I think these three points are indispensable.

Yes, you should check projects website and also developers page, devs should have real names and their photos,  project should have a supporting community ,stage of the the project is also important ,the idea behind the project is an important key for successful investments.

Well it would be hard these days to justify a good bounty even the ones being run by high profile members in this great community these days can be scam. But the few factors that i always look for before participating in any bounty campaign is the idea behind the project is it achievable and are their goals realistic. These days so many projects want to do things that is not practical. Another thing is to look at the team members who have been shown as team members and check out their individual profile whether they are actually involved in the project sometimes the team members can be fake. Tread carefully and i am sure you will do good in this community.

I think the main idea of project. Because , people first check for the idea for understand bounty. So, most important criteria is  idea for me.

It's really hard to find good bounty now, but it still possible. For example you can chack bountyhive or amazix this two places with good bounty's imho. ALso I recoomend you to participate in bounty programms wich Sylon as a bounty manager.

it is true the community can support the project but not necessarily the project is good, because I think we should see from the concept and potential of the project and read whitepaper also the team behind it can influence the success of their project

The best criterion for choosing a bounty is the idea, it should be viable and useful. Then pay attention to the team, the team must be realistic and meet the objectives of the project.

a bounty of success is not only seen in Whitepaper or kamunitasnya, if I want to follow the bounty/ ICO, usually I ask "how many tokens have been sold?" or I see on the website, If the token sold has reached the soft hat, I will invest or follow the prize in the project.

Just like an ICO, you gotta check the supply of coins (1%? 2%? for bounties), Token value potential, the capability of the team to deliver that value, etc.

The difference is: you are not going to invest money. Instead, you are investing your time, which is another valuable resource, into that ICO.

You are very much right with projects having large communities that have failed. As for me, i look at track records of previous bounties organised by the bounty manager before making conclusions as to the success of the bounty/project. Although, large communities are beneficial to projects in some ways; however most projects with large communities bought their way through via airdrops.

I would say it is not enough to just look at the technology or the community, it should really have both. At ICO stage it is impossible to tell as the community has not been built yet. The project team is the most important, then after that see if it is a deliverable project or going to be a failed ICO

The choice of bounty should be approached as seriously as the choice of ICO, so as not to waste your time. To get acquainted with the company's website, to evaluate the usefulness of their products, to see the road map

For me, the criterion of a good bounty is a good and necessary project idea, strong and detailed WP and known or at least proven experienced team. When I'm too lazy to study the technical project intricacies, I just choose a bounty campaign proven managers who either have a low scam percentage or haven't at all. Such managers usually care about their reputation and won't take any projects into work simply because they are paid for it in bitcoin or fiat (not in tokens)

I do used the following criteria to judge good bounties: white papers, teams and existing structures.  If you can find good information about this three others criteria will be secondary.  I have also find out that the team matter the most because without good team no matter the write-up and structure, the projects will still fail.

As long as it is not associated with token suite then you have lower risks of being paid according to your efforts. Most campaigns associated with token suites often fails to give rewards and turns out to be a scam so I suggest you stay away from these bounty platforms.

You are trying to look deeper into the project, which is a nice thing. You can learn a lot from the structure of the whitepaper and the website, the words and phrases used tells a LOT.

Otherwise, check their team, their connections, try to judge how credible and competent they may be.
Their telegram channel is worth checking, but rather for the replies of the team.
Evaluate the idea behind the project, and after all these, you might know where to invest.

Whitepaper is certainly an important document by which we can judge the project, it is also worth evaluating the site and the team, it is no less important components of the success of the project. Despite the fact that many projects that have a fairly large community turned out to be a fraud, it still affects the project positively, the more people the better. Personally, I'm looking for those projects whose developers are already working with quite well-known and established players in any technical or social services.

My evaluation criteria are pretty simple, see if their whitepaper is feasible, whether the founders can afford it, the funds they invest, the reputable ICO rating group

Whitepaper and an existing working product is a very important factor in choosing a good ICO bounty plus a big bounty pool and handled by a trusted campaign manager of the forum that is my criteria for judging a good bounty.

A very large criterion is a certain background of the team and the project as a whole, if there is something to learn, it is always more interesting to consider.

I have been joining on bounty campaign since last year and based on my experienced i chose the bounty program or project simply by having a good white paper, website and a devoted team members and a CEO. And sometimes even if that project have that all criteria, they failed and scammed people like the other bounty.

I have done bounty and airdrop.
Ok. I already realize that have a lot of scam both bounty and airdrop.
So when I join airdrop and bounty, I check very clearly with bounty, and airdrop is a little.
- About airdrop:
+ I usually check about this project have app. Without, I will check DEV team, and presentation on their website. Moreover, I care to communicate on telegram, twitter, bounty.
- About bounty:
+ I also check same airdrop but more clearly. Add, I will active pm with  amount of one our DEV to verified  Have they joined or worked with this project?
Special, I think in order to that project thrive. Their technology must very very good , It must be applied in practice. I usually prioritize some projects mention or have platform about advanced technology.

The quality of current bounty activities is declining. If you want to get a very good project through bounty and hold it for a long time, it is basically impossible. As long as you can complete the currency, it is better.

Before participating in any Bounty  I often deeply research the project. My advice is to pay attention to whether the projects have a ready-made product as it is some kind of guarantee that it is not a scam as well as long termed activity before ICO.

I don't have a very keen eyes when it comes to looking for the best available bounty in the community. The one I look first is the campaign manager. Once it is a reputable campaign manager, I always think that it is a good bounty campaign. Because of the history of their works. Which is right sometimes.  ;D

You are write good whitepaper, team members are key factors for good bounty. But even good team members sometimes fail to execute the ICO successfully. You have to see the project if it holds the potentiality or importance to current market.

What you're doing is the way to go to know if you want to know if a bounty is good or not. I suggest that you also try to contact the bounty manager or the team behind the email if you have further questions regarding the bounty campaign, send them an email or two. Also see the number of participants the number of participants can help you determine if the project is legit or not, but this is not the most reliable way to do it. Sometimes it's just luck that the bounty campaign you participated in is legit.

it's very hard to find a promising bounty, because if we read the white paper, it's all very promising, but at the end of the team's campaign is blurred, and does not provide clear information. luck factor is needed here.

All would agree that it is really hard to know for a good bounty campaign nowadays as there are more people that were scammed by the ICO they had joined in their bounty campaign. Some bounty campaign didn't continue and for some it had continued until the end of the campaign but were left out of the blue. In my case, i will consider looking the spreadsheet and check out for the bounty participants if there are many high ranking members participating and my last consideration is to check for the bounty manager that handles the project.

Yes, I agree with you, I also follow the same logic as you. But sometimes I also look at the ratings of the project, as well as the number of subscribers and the latest news on social networks. But still the project to great regret may turn out to be a scam. There is no 100% certainty.

that right, you must also see the public profile of the team of the project or their partners if they are highly influential to gather much investors as much as they can.

If your competence is enough to evaluate whitepaper then it is good. But not everyone can adequately assess the project. Therefore, it happens that the worst bounty a lot of participants.

I analyze many things before participating in a bounty campaign. In my opinion it is not very important that at the beginning the project does not have a large community of members that follow it, the most important things are having a valuable project, a high quality whitepaper, and having a team made up of high level professionals that will be able to develop the project

If you decide to participate in the bounty, the main thing is not to take part in everything.
At least choose only real projects, the teams of which really work and show progress and result.

Best bounty campaign isnt depend on allocation. Gonestly i must prefer bounty which pool is around 1m$. Then check if the project had detailed enough pointing its key for a unique and reliable ICO. Not over exagerated on the vision and mission. Project need to have a best point what their product  really means.

Nowadays we learn that many projects are scam. We spend a lot of effort on bounty campaigns and expect a response. I am frequently reviewing projects.
I get the biggest help from the Telegram. You should also look at the Telegram groups of the projects.

I usually check the following factors to determine whether a particular bounty is worth participating in or not.

- Development team background
- Campaign manager
- Social media interactions by the development team
- Whitepaper analysis
- Website
- Number of participants and bounty fund

I research these factors thoroughly before joining any bounty on this forum which is the primary reason I have not been scammed till now. Do your research carefully people.

First you need to understand some things about crypto and ICO in general. Then read whitepaper and see does it look logical to you. You should find more info in telegram by asking questions. If everything satisfy you, feel free to join that bounty.

All of you correctly do, and it's necessary to work in this sphere. First Of All You need to research about that bounty project and their team and second see their roadmap total coin supply and all then choose their bounty.

This is what I was going to say. And you even added a few more points than I would have. These are the things that you should be looking for to check if a project is legit or not. Extensive research is always the best way to find out where a project is headed. Also one more thing, the bounty manager matters just as much as the bounty itself, if the bounty manager cannot be trusted then the bounty cannot be trusted.

A big number of customers on Twitter or telegram does not try whatever chore. The comprehension of the recommendation is each the more more crucial.

Payments that they give, and how actively promote the project, as many projects take off very powerfully and others do not Fig not fly up,as it depends on many facts including the activity of developers, designers of the whole team, for what purposes

Well, I'll tell you what criteria I choose, the first is the idea of the project and what they want to create, the second is the team and project manager, and publicity in social networks

The telegram community we see is very deceitful as most of the members are all airdrop and bounty members. The recent development now is do an airdrop or referral program to attract as much people to their groups. I don't judge based on the telegram group member count I also think about the project itself and how committed the team are to achieving their goals. I also check if they have an MVP or have been in business for a while.

The best one is always the bounty, where the ICO is already successful and reached the Soft Cap, that's an insurance that you'll get your tokens, but it depends on the bounty manager too, I know many of them, from whom you never get tokens.

We need to first determine - which is the bounty company. If Twitter and FB, then you can go into everything. Except, of course, 100% of the skam is visible even with the naked eye

Well, there is no one specific parameter, you need to evaluate both ann thread, and site, and the collected (and planned) amount, the number of posts in social networks, their informativeness, cooperation with other ICOs, finally the manager's reputation, real persons in the team and so Further...... ::)

My criteria:

1. Team - experience and competences
2. Whitepaper - does it make sense?
3. Final product - is it useful, does it make someones life easier?

Actually the most important criteria I consider is to find a well known bounty manager with high reputation because if bounty manager is not ok even if the project will be succesful  there can be lots of problems with stakes count and distribution too...

Yeah mostly big communities are due to airdrops and bounty campaigns so you are very right that big communities are not a solid criteria to pick and choose a project, if you are looking for a quality bounty campaign do everything that an investor will do before investing in the ico, so if  the project passes your quality checks and due diligence only then you should promote it.

The bounty manager, I have participated in many Sandra´s campaign and I didnt have any problem with her campaign, so I am loyal to her cacampaigns.

Unfortunately, what many consider to be the right criteria for the success of the project - does not always work. Whitepeper and the road map are important things, yes, but sometimes people who do not have a project do it. You need to have information about the team.

how many friends Facebook / followers on twitter has a small chance in the success of a bounty, of course the most important thing in the success of a bounty is a team of developers who are able to plan strategies so that bounty achieve success

First of all you need to do research on the bounty projects, Secondly you need to look at the team of the projects because the team alone plays a vital role in the project for it to be outstanding.

Me as well they manage carefully the bounties they are promoting and their projects are pretty good. No such failure maybe some projects tends to be failed. I think good bounty will start from the developer and the team. Bounty manager will handle that if he/she has high reputation before and endorse by high ranking accounts.

For many months I make a careful selection before participating in a bounty campaign. I check everything a bit, but the main things in my opinion are the whitepaper, which must be of very good quality, the team that must be formed by people with a good curriculum and professional advisor,s and a roadmap of the project that is credible

First and foremost, if you want to join a very good bounty...
make sure that bounty has a very good ICO and TEAM...
bounty always depends on the Team that manages the ICO and how will their ICO project be.

I honestly collecting bounties based on bounty manager, total allocation of the campaign and the ICO ratings. But if you looking for a good bounty then look for the team's background, whitepaper, website, community and a working product. :)

I've seen a lot of same topics. Why did you create it again? Try to use forume and find information what you need!

I hope recent days most of the bounty hunters understood the complete the ICO bounty how to pick from the forum. Please do not believe all the ICO rating sites because ICO projects are not meant all the time to make money if the team does not have real worth to invest.

White paper only thing to enough to understand the project. Then one of thing project road map is about for 2 years more means you need to invest on the project they take back ahead.

There are so many ways to choose a good bounty  but the best criteria to judge a good bounty is as follows :
 1: To read all given instructions carefully in Bounty campaign.
 2: check their team, their connections ,their work and their experience.
 3: Identify the objective of the project.
 4: Whitepaper and an existing working are also helping in choosing a good ICO bounty

For me, the best criterion when choosing a campaign bounty is a good project. Earlier I tried to choose managers, but as time showed they do not greatly value their reputation.

If you have a lot of time and you want to spend it with benefit for yourself and other people, then I advise you to come here and learn about the prospective project. P2PS
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3267287
https://www.p2psf.org

The most important criterion is certainly a worthy project. It is very important that there is at least an MVP and that the idea is not a copy of another existing project. The market is full of projects with the same ideas, of course competition is good, but after the ICO, most of them just disappear

there is many things to check before joining any bounty, As far my knowledge first of all see the time period of that bounty then check who is the bounty manager and how many stages they are giving in that bounty.Then read the white paper and check the worth of that project and also check the track record of the team who is going to lead the project to make it successful. After joining the bounty check ever week that bounty manager has awarded your stage as per your work or not, it is very important . Good bounty manager check your work weekly and awarded your stage after two three days of work.

HOW TO FIND A BOOTTY ICO NGON
(Article based on personal point of view)
To find a good bounty then of course find out which ICO is hot. We will evaluate ICOs by the following criteria:

1-Rating: go to websites like
https://icobench.com/
http://icorating.com/
https://crushcrypto.com
.....

2-Communities:
The ICO, whose topic ANN on bitcointalk.org has many pages, is that many people comment on that comment, proving it is of interest.
- Its bounty has many pages and check its spreadsheet see many people apply for it, it also proved to be of much interest.
-The ICOs are discussed by many groups, ok duj like IndaHash, CyberMiles. In the past two ATS and Proby were also delicious.

3-ICO News & Specs
- The ICO do good stitches, it is much advertised is fine.
- Based on the coin it bonus + Coin price when the ICO, max supply ... to calculate how to make it bounty of how much money.

*** To sum up 3 on the ICO see high ratings, then look for bounty and then do.

Dear friend,
There are many criterias to determine a good bounty. It is up to each ICO and how to reach the market. Some criterias are size of pool for bounty, the team for developing, the method to reach market, the market that coins to join.,...

You should consider about the population of that bounty, which you can see through their social media campaigns like fb,twitter,telegramor blogging youtube or reddit,blog writtings, then once you are going to joinin the signature campaign, you should take a look at the allocation, if it is arund 25-40%  then that would be the ideal bounty allocation. Then you have to research the product/services that this ICO has to offer,if there is none, I don't think you should join.

Criteria are many, and one more important point is in the bounty, this is the manager who leads him, much depends on him how much you earn.

I see quality gifts by observing team profiles and team credibility, I am also paying attention to the concept of corporate ideas that they manage, many prizes that create ideas beyond their means, so the gift ends with a scam

their plan, their team, their partners, their platform, rating or feedback and also their product is the best criteria to look if you are looking for a good bounty campaign.

of course I will examine the details of the project first, see how the white paper and their road map. team members are important, but important with whom they partner and who their sponsors are. Good luck.

I think the biggest influence for bounty programs and ico projects is on the advisors and ambasadors in the ico project. the more prominent advisors and ambassadors on the project then sales at ico will be successful.

I always prefer working with some set of managers, such amazix, because i cannot cope with the stress of doing thorough research on a project and at the end, it fails. Since some of these managers have successfully managed projects, i just do little findings on their projects and join.

All of you delineating absolute create, and it's elementary to chore in this creation. But the body of the project - is his delineating humanity, you faculty double o ended unwillingly who is developers of this or that projects.

The best one is dependably the abundance, where the ICO is as of now effective and achieved the Soft Cap, that is a protection that you'll get your tokens, however it relies upon the abundance administrator as well, I know a large number of them, from whom you never get tokens.

Bounty hunters always know how to make money for themselves. Therefore, they always have the criteria for evaluating good bonus campaigns. How long does it take to participate in the campaign, who has the investment and development potential?

Nowadays it is rather difficult to determine which bounty is really good. When we see technically we see good prospects and it turns out that token values are not comparable to our analysis. My strategy is only to take part in the bounty as much, and hope that at least 10 percent of the value is enough for me.

To judge a good bounty
1. The bounty manager: have come to know some managers prefer to safe their integrity and name, they stand in as escrow and get you paid for your effort, when ever they see things are going sideways. They will rather stop the bounty and save everyone the stress. Try look for a trust worthy bounty manager with good reputation.

To find a good bounty, we must first select a good ICO campaign. Typically I would look for potential ICO projects through well-known bitcointalk managers and find the current ICO campaigns they are managing. That's how I see it best to find a potential ICO campaign in which the ICO scam rate is more than 70% at now.

the bounty is indeed good, the first time I can see how the sales achievement. When his token sales already exceed the softcap, then I value it a great bounty. Usually many devotees to type this kind of bounty.

Yes, the bounty manager in this case is important because it bridges good relations with the project development team. The first one I checked to participate in the gift was the bounty manager, then checked the white paper and the development team, then made comparisons from various rating sites, and did not forget to check the team's activities on various social media.

Look at financial terms and conditions of the project. If it is no scam project team will return funds to contributors in case of soft cap failure.

everyone has its own assessment aspects. many are judging from the team but also a whitepaper is a must to note is also to be able to determine a generating bounty. When more and more analysis of the team, the whitepaper, the website certainly provide enough good results also for the profit that could be obtained.

I think that is a risk, as well as investing. that's why every ico project has a considerable level of risk compared to investing in an altcoin that has entered the exchange. so, the conclusion
every ico campaign that you will follow must be studied first like when you want to try investing

I think there are two criterias that point that bounty is good - reached soft cap and working minimum viable product

 I basically look into the crypto arena based on the quality of the project they have and the product they intend to offer the market, without a quality product, the project is as good as failed as this is the sole marketing source. Then look at the development team of the project, a competent development team experienced enough to come up with a good project suitable of the market is also a key factor

The most important thing to look at when choosing an ICO is the team and the project. If the project is promising and there is probably already a finished product, then it remains only to see what the development team is working on it. It is worth investing in such ICO, although it is still necessary to invest in them only in the long term, for at least 2 years.

Definitely Yes,we should check all social media for the ICO project to join. It is one of the assurance that the ICO is not scam and have a good platforms. The community members always follow if the ICO is clearly stated in their website. This is an important keys on how to join a successful investment.

The white paper is undoubtedly an important document we can judge the project, and it is also worth evaluating the website and the team, which is also an important part of the success of the project. Of course, popularity is also an important factor for the success of this project.

The best criteria to judge that the bounty is good or not can be seen from:
a. The bounty manager (see the rank and trac record)
b. Token allocation and percentage for each campaign
c. The ICO to be promoted has reached the softcap
d. It promotes the ICO with the ready products

I think it's the most intuitive way to see if a community of projects is huge. For the choice of bounty, because you don't have the time to browse every bounty website or read the white paper for each project, but the community number of members is what you can see at a glance.

My principle is to see the feasibility of the project, and the power behind the project. I am referring to the partner. A good project will have many big companies to support them. Such a project will make you make a lot of money.

bounty hunter team certainly not paying attention to the wrong things. with an experienced team, it will make a project can walk well and smoothly. even the usual project alone will be wonderful when handled by a team of top-quality indeed. However, it is also a whitepaper content from a concept in critical limits stretcher by the team and this will complement each other.

in my opinion, a good bounty to follow is a bounty that has a large big allocation because with that the bounty hunters will get the satisfactory results. other than that a good bounty is a bounty that has tokens or coins with high prices. usually, a lot of projects have coins and the price when sold the price is below in ico

We have to base in their undertaking like in the event that they can go extremely prominent here in crypto so case of it currently are trade.io and eo.trade obviously even they not advance here in gathering I figure they will swing great to a well known exchanging site in light of their stage and a considerable measure of genuine users,traders and speculators will utilize this something else we can depend to the designer like on the off chance that they officially here in crypto and know as a useful for crypto or they effectively mainstream here obviously in the event that he/she run a crusade here in crypto obviously that is useful for each users,traders and financial specialists

when I join a gift, the criteria that I put forward the most is a project that really runs in the world. for example bank-based projects etc.

For my few knowledge about bounty projects the best criteria to judge a particular bounty are those person behind the project. For me not all large number of community on a some projects is only basis to determine if it has a poor chances you to become successful. Because sometimes the more developers the great project is always there and aslo having a real platforms and whitepapers with a purpose is one of the good basis of bounty project.

The most important for me is the idea and the vision  behind the project, for what a problem is it a solution for.
After that looking at the team is it experienced enough to fulfil the goals of the project. After that looking to the
social and marketing aspects.

It goes just beyond that, even if a project have large community which is mostly inflated by airdrop participants. They project might still fail.
You need to do some research about the authenticity of the project and then go ahead to do some basic plus and minus (research) to know how much the team allocate for the bounty campaign.

some of this campaign even if they are real, allocate pennies for their campaign and you wouldn't want to work for the long period of time only to receive penny at the end of the period.

If you want to judge the good bounty first check the idea secondly check the resume of team member,white paper and road map of the bounty. These things help you to select good bounty.

Having checked on some of those criteria mentioned above some bounties still turned scam despite having a sound technical whitepaper, did you consider ICOs not reaching Soft Cap? due to already established project similar to the one you are involved.

I analyze many things before participating in a bounty campaign. In my opinion, it is not very important that at the beginning the project does not have a large community of members that follow it, the most important things are having a valuable project having a team made up of high-level professionals that will be able to develop the project.

most important criteria I consider is to find a well known bounty manager with high reputation because if bounty manager is not ok even if the project will be succesful  there can be lots of problems with stakes count.

The message network we see is exceptionally misleading as the vast majority of the individuals are all airdrop and abundance individuals. The ongoing advancement currently is complete an airdrop or referral program to pull in as much individuals to their gatherings. I don't pass judgment on in view of the message amass part check I likewise consider the undertaking itself and how dedicated the group are to accomplishing their objectives. I additionally check on the off chance that they have a MVP or have been doing business for some time.

I personally read 80% white paper for the projects in which I participate
Because I often write an article
But there are more important factors to make sure for credibility
Such as team and activity
Presence on the ground and in social media.

For so many, I think the best criteria to judge a bounty is by checking out the team members behind it, and accessing whether or not they are reliable enough to keep to their promises. For some others, they judge a bounty by going through the whitepaper of the project. They feel that if the project ends up being a success, then definitely all bounty promises will be fulfilled.

Personally, I try to look more closely at the team and the problem that the project is going to solve!

For me the best criteria would be to look at the project itself, a project which is planning to stay for a long time will most likely pay out the rewards for the bounty since they do not want unpaid bounties hindering their success in the market. Also I think that the bounty manager that is handling the bounty is also a big part as some are known to partner with scam projects.

you should always look at the project itself, whether it will prove to be a swine. you also need to pay attention to the product that is offered for the crypto community. Pay attention to the command. And if you have positive emotions, then this is a good bounty company.

Before joining new bounty I am doing some research. What this project stands for, why they doing an ico. Second point is team. Any all-stars team members. Another point is rewards for the bounty campaigns. It is very important how the bounty hunters would be appreciated for their hard work.

For me the most important for an ICO is the product and what is the vision behind. I am selecting those which already has a working product and it is not just an idea phase. Statistics says they have more chances for success.

Their terms.

I think Achievement is important.

Yep, they also use many other tricks such as putting their tokens on exchanges during the ICO, they push their token prices 5 times higher than the ICO. Is that a way to deceive investors and bounty hunters?

all what you have research is good but do not rely on that alone. whitepaper may not give you clear indication of good bounty and by the way finding good bounty this days is just luck. if you have been participating in bounties you will realized the least expected bounty are those one that turn out great while those one you give high priorities have failed.also you should learn to follow good manager that have strict rules relating to bounty campaign. this will expose some hunters that use fake account and steal peoples work thereby increasing your earning.

I think community is the key, I mean you judge the coin itself with the team and the features and the whitepaper and what its trying to solve and so forth but when it comes to bounty its all about the community, if the community is hyped and interested and excited than you are on the right path and that bounty will be both useful and worth something one day. With that in mind you can see a lot of shills doing paid work as well so you need to be careful and check why the people like the coin so much.

For example people LOVE nano but it went down incredibly however I still trust it. Spectrecoin was reached around 6 dollar levels and now dropped to 25 cents or so but I still trust it. Why do I trust these coins even tho they dropped so much? Because they are amazing and very much backed by the community.

I'm not attached to the community. I pay attention to the development team. The rating of the project is very important. These are my requirements.

Yes you are right, those heavy investors should check the developers before investing a huge amount of coins in order to determine if it was a legitimate campaign or not.

The best criterion for choosing a bounty company is, first of all, the evaluation of the product produced by the company. If the product is really useful to society, it will be good.

Limitation.
If you see limits on participation in this or that project - I congratulate you.
You will most likely be able to earn good money.

The best criterion for choosing a bounty campaign is, you should evaluate the product they produced first. Check their white papers and developer as well as the team. And then analyze everything.

i usually check out the ico team first and see if they are active and promote the project at live events. if they do that, its a plus for the bountie. of course this is not the only thing that makes a good ico and bountie, but it is a point to watch out for.

There are many ways to judge a good bounty, like, reading its whitepaper. You can see all the detailed information regarding on the tokensale and its token by reading its whitepaper. You can extensively verify also the team composition if the team is strong or not.

Yes I believe you are correct, most of the hunters judge how good a bounty is by looking at the people who manage it but for me the vision and goal of the bounty is much more better. I see a lot of ICO becoming successful even though it was handle but someone who is not famous managers. I believe that reading the whitepaper and roadmap should be the basis in judging a ICO.

Dear friend,
What is the best criteria to judge a good bounty? This is a exciting question. Yeah, I have some criterias for choosing bounty campaigns. Such as, the pool serve for, developing team, managed team, the market located, the objects reach to.

In my own opinion, campaign manager is the very first factor that we need to consider in looking for a legit and profitable ICO. We must conduct a thorough research of their background to check if they are that Professional to manage a campaign.

It's almost impossible to know a good bounty from the beginning,but there are measures to take in order to be at least 60% sure it's a good bounty;going through the white paper thoroughly,campaign managers is also another way to get good bounties,managers such as amazix always provide perfect bounties,you should also look out for the management team,bounty managers e.t.c

To choose a bounty, first of all you need to choose a project.If the project is worthy and unique-then the bounty will be held at the highest level.That usually happens.

To check their ideas and goals.

Check the comment regarding this bounty in this forum.

Not everything "convincing" is a winner, that is for sure. You can get tons and tons of whitepaper, websites that can rock and information that is as impressive as the U.S. constitution but all of this boils down to the players and makers of the said company. We can never tell what their personalities are, what their attitudes and things they like and dislike in general but everything boils down to them. One wrong move and your millions will go directly to the dust bin.

Yes, the whitepaper can be used as a general description of an ICO project. Next, I see the project from their product. Because I think the success of the project and the price of their tokens one of them is determined by the products they create for the future.

Yes in white paper all details have been described and you can judge about that bounty by researching white paper but I am selecting bounty just like I am investing ICO. For that purpose I check also their social media accounts like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Telegram and Reddit. I check How much followers of that project in this social media accounts, more followers mean more people interested in that project so its good. Other point is I check who managing that bounty mean I check about bounty manager trust level. And Last one how much tokens they allocated for bounty , it should not above 3-4%.

The development team of the ICO is the main key to the success of the bounty you are working on.
If you understand the development team like the advisor, Vitalik Buterin, I'm sure the ICO will be successful until listing on the Exchange.

those things cant guarantee you that a bounty is legit because nowadays it is really possible to fake those info' and other important details . any one can copy paste or create a fake dummy accounts and profiles online .

So overall id say there is no best criteria to judge a good bounty because it'll all depends on your luck . choosing a bounty is no difference than playing a gambling , you can mostly loose and can rarely won the game .

So goodluck for chosing this journey .

There are no best criteria to judge a good bounty. Ideally, you should do your homework before joining any bounty but you still need some element of luck to ensure that you have not wasted your time to acquire tokens that won't be worth what you thought it would be.
Also many bounties nowadays are delaying payments for long.

every aspect will be important to analyze projects let alone amid the multitude of scam happens. The team, whitepaper, the site will be the source of the information should at least be known will find a project that is indeed appropriate and produces. Manager and even social media are always on will give you a good overview of the project they are working on.

First, I always look at the representative on the forum , and then pay attention to the site , the team and the road map.

We all want to participate in good projects to get more bonuses. Although the members of the bonus do not invest money into the project and do not buy the cards. Please study the project before joining.

I generally believe investors. Because they are way more experienced than us .  So i am looking icos and i investigating detailly their investors. For example pantera capital  zhenfund etc.
They are strong investor companies and if they invested in these icos i can believe that ico is not a scam. Yes maybe that can not be good roi in future. But at least i can understand from here about scammy issue.
Please always check that information always both side. Enter investors website and check that project from there also.