Bitcoin Forum

ah nice another cryptoindex, glenns coinmarketcap is very corrupt and i welcome all diversification away from it

i will add your index and your project to my website

https://www.cryptoproductivity.org/research

if you register my token on your index

https://www.cryptoproductivity.org/registration-data

Nice. At least another good alternative to coinmarkecap.

Just a comment though, I'm just bothered by the social media pane in the left side and advertisement on top and below. Tried it on 3 separate browsers Chrome, FF and Safari and everything looks perfect.

Excellent site. It will be necessary to look for a difference with coinmarketcap. However, I do not see an alternative to coinmarketcap. Than your site better?

there are plenty of alternatives to coinmarket cap that is known for its corruption, glenn the founder of it has received payments in the millions by corrupt icos to get themselves listed high in the ranking.

these coins are now called by the brainwashed cryptocommunity as "leading top coins" people are so damn stupid

https://www.cryptoproductivity.org/research

i would add this index to my indexation page.

regards

Excellent site, the first thing that caught my attention is the calculator above, which enables you to convert between cryptos ---> USD and others.
For the site design I am very annoyed by the ads, many of it in addition to the social media pane, try to reduce them.
People are also interested in "Price Graph" more than "Changes 1H/7D."

Try adding a table to TOP gainers/losers.

I like the fact that you also show 1 hour price changes, that's pretty handy.
Those flashing price changes are very annoying though, there should be a way to turn that off.

Also, why are some price graphs green and others red? Does that have something to do with the trend line perhaps?

Increase the font size, turn off the flashing when the price changes, don't open a new window when I click on a coin.

How is it now?

If I may add another comment, Should it be Circulating Supply and not Available Supply?

If you look at Bitcoin: Available Supply: 17.27 M BTC, which is wrong in my opinion. Available supply is less than 4 M BTC as far as I know. Can someone clarify that?

available supply and circulating supply is in theory the same, you mean a different indication like distribution index, or asset distribution asymetry factor

He's saying that for him, "Available Supply" means the amount that is remaining to be mined/created (maximum supply - actual circulating supply), while on the website, this indicates the actual circulating supply (the amount of BTC that already exists). It's just a matter of wording.

Exactly, this is how I understand "Available Supply" so for me there is a big difference. Circulating Supply is 17 M while available Supply is ~ 4 M, just saying.

if you define something called circulating supply you exclude some asset holders, like for example the institution that opperates that currency and regulates its release into the economy,

for millenia we humans have relied on such insititutions, in order to have beneficial effects of money on our society,

if an institution runs a bigg cryptocurrency bigger than others, then its not something bad, it simply opperates on a different economic scale. in different dimensions.

not every currency has to be designed to fund the construction of a hotel in a vilage in southern whatever land

regards

Have PM request for Exchange listing.

Your site is a little slow in my end.

Like the look and how it works.

ah damn neverending perfectionism

without mistakes we wont get any development at all

mistakes make things spicy, like this dragon egg out of wood, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQLaZb6zSsg&t=270s

and it is a sign that someone is doing/building something there, and that its not

standardised central bank funded highly wasteful agenda

without tolarance for inperfectionism we will get less and less decentral enterpreneurship

regards

i'm working hard on site speed. But it's too hard to solve.

You are really don't like coinmarketcap. I find him on 13th place on your list  :D :D

no i dont its not in my interest supporting it, and its corruption, this creates of course an environment that supports new cryptoindexes and hopefully they will soon disagree on indexing content with the corrupt established index mafia.

but i also consider removing it, if gliss will continue to demand a bribe for listening on CMC.

cryptoindexation and reviewal industry is highly corrupt

i heard of websites that deliberately list all coins and token as negative and bad if they didnt bribed the website owner.